<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Environmental Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-2197</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2016.79106</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEP-69831</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Elevated CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Effects on Lichen Frequencies and Diversity Distributions in Free-Air CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Enrichment (FACE) Station
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Abas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M.</surname><given-names>S. Nizam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>W. Aqif</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Environmental &amp;amp; Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Science &amp;amp; Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Malaysia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Institute of Climate Change, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Malaysia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>azlanabas@ukm.edu.my(AA)</email>;<email>azlanabas@ukm.edu.my(MSN)</email>;<email>azlanabas@ukm.edu.my(AWA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>08</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1192</fpage><lpage>1197</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>13</month>	<year>August</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Carbon dioxides (CO
  <sub>2</sub>) concentration has become much higher every year and this has already become the global issue. Lichen is a symbiotic organism that is best known as the air pollution indicator. Based on its frequency and diversity distribution, the level of pollution that has been made can be determined. This re-search was conducted in UKM Fernarium Free Air Carbon Dioxides Enrichment Station (FACE Station) with lichen frequencies and diversities observed and analyzed statistically and graphically. Seven species of li-chens were found at the sampling locations. Findings showed that there was significant relationship in lichen frequency and diversity distribution under elevated CO
  <sub>2</sub> inside FACE Station with its surrounding. 
   
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Carbon Dioxides</kwd><kwd> Lichens</kwd><kwd> Air Pollution</kwd><kwd> FACE Station</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Lichens, the product of a symbiotic relationship between a fungus (mycobiont) and at least one photosynthetic algae or cyanobacterium (photobiont), are widely used as bio-indicators of air pollution and environmental change, both at cellular and the population or community level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69831-ref1">1</xref>] . Due to the unique biology and their sensitivity to pollutants, lichens respond to variations in atmospheric composition and may be a useful measure for monitoring environmental quality. Lichens are responding to global warming and some long-term monitoring programmes have proved their sensitivity, mainly through a community approach, while only few studies investigated ecophysiological responses to climatic change [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69831-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>In Malaysia, a limited number of studies have used lichens as indicators of air pollution, especially to evaluate lichens response on elevation of CO<sub>2</sub> levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69831-ref3">3</xref>] . The negative effects of warming on the carbon balance of lichens may be at least partly counteracted by increases in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> levels. In lichens, the inability to regulate water loss limits the possible responses to CO<sub>2</sub> as compared to those of vascular plants, although the trade-offs related to, for instance, nitrogen allocation occur here just as much. This could also be the case for those epiphytes that grow closely attached to canopy soil or directly on living branches. For such species, increased respiration of the substrate due to higher temperatures may provide more extra CO<sub>2</sub> than the increased atmospheric levels. The objectives of this research were to compare the lichen diversity inside and outside Free-Air CO<sub>2</sub> Enrichments Station (FACE) and to analyze the distribution of identified lichen species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69831-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69831-ref5">5</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Design</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>Research was conducted in the FACE Station located in UKM Fernarium, The National University of Malaysia (02˚55'20.3&quot;N 101˚46'59.4&quot;E). FACE Station in UKM Fernarium was programmed automatically to release CO<sub>2</sub> into the surroundings at fluctuated concentration. A computer-control system uses the wind speed and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration information to adjust the CO<sub>2</sub> flow rates to maintain the desired CO<sub>2</sub> concentration at the centre of the FACE ring. The system uses the wind direction information to turn on only those pipes upwind of the plots, so that CO<sub>2</sub>-enriched air flows across the plots, no matter which way the wind blows. When wind speeds are low (&lt;0.4 m/s) and direction is difficult to detect, the CO<sub>2</sub>-enriched air is released from every other vertical pipe around the ring. The CO<sub>2</sub> flow rate is updated every second, and the choice of which vertical pipes to release from is updated every 4 seconds. Three different distances (20 m, 50 m and 80 m approximately) were selected to depict the effects of CO<sub>2</sub> on lichen distribution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> FACE Station location (02˚55'20.3&quot;N 101˚46'59.4&quot;E) with three different boundaries for collecting lichen samples</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-6703034x7.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Lichen Identification</title><p>Lichen samples were collected in FACE Station and from its 80 m perimeters. All epiphytic lichen specimens were identified using a stereomicroscope and chemical spot tests, a UV lamp, and TLC following the standard checklists of Sipman in Singapore [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69831-ref6">6</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Lichen Diversity Distribution</title><p>Lichen diversity frequencies were determined using quadrate (20 cm &#215; 50 cm). For each sampling points, 20 trees were selected randomly to evaluate lichen species distribution frequency. Lichen was sampled by each wind directions at approximately 3 meters height. Only trees with circumference around 60 - 120 cm selected to conduct the sampling. Sampling was conducted in three different distances (20 m, 50 m &amp; 80 m) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69831-ref7">7</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Analysis</title><p>Every data recorded was analyzed using statistical analysis Shannon’s Diversity Index and Evenness to understand the diversity’s rate of lichen species at FACE Station and its surrounding. Lichen species frequency density also analyzed using graphical analysis ArcGIS 10.3 to evaluate the distribution of lichen species based on its frequency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69831-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69831-ref8">8</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Lichen Species in FACE Station</title><p>Seven species of lichen were identified and divided into three genera. All of them belong to crustose groups: Cryptothecia striata, Cryptothecia scripta, Cryptothecia granularis Cryptothecia subtecta, Porina tetracea, Myriotrema minutum and one unknown species labelled as crustose 1. All lichen been found were identified and matched with Sipman (2009) publication from Singapore. All lichen’s picture that has been found in FACE station were shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Lichen Frequency Distribution</title><p>From 20 trees from each sampling locations, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the lichen species been found, the frequencies for each species from each location, the species diversity index (H) and the evenness value (E). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the frequencies distribution for each of lichen species for all sampling locations graphically.</p><p>Based on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, the highest frequencies for all species is Cryptothecia striata with 35% at FACE Station, 21% at 50 m from FACE Station and 80 m from FACE Station. Followed by Cryptothecia granularis, Cryptothecia scripta, Porina tetracea, Myriotrema minutum, Cryptothecia subtecta and the lowest is Crustose 1 with 6.5% frequency and only can be found at 80 m from FACE Station. It shows that there are significant differences in the frequencies of lichen species in term of CO<sub>2</sub> effects. Increase in CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (inside FACE Station) unequivocally also increase the rate of photosynthesis occurred inside lichen’s photobiont. In general, photosynthesis process needs CO<sub>2</sub> and water in order for the process run in optimal condition. That’s the reason why frequencies of lichen species that exist inside FACE Station were much higher compare to 50 m from FACE Station and 80 m from FACE Station.</p><p>In term of diversity, different CO<sub>2</sub> concentration affected lichen diversity substantially. Lichen diversity increased gradually when receding the FACE Station. According to species diversity index (H) in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the value of the index increased from FACE Station is 1.35, 50 m from FACE Station 1.53 and 80 m from FACE Station is 1.89. Increase in CO<sub>2</sub> concentration affected several of lichen’s growth such as Cryptothecia scripta, Cryptothecia subtecta and Crustose 1. These three species only existed outside the FACE Station. The difference in lichens distribution shows that lichens get affected with the elevation of CO<sub>2</sub>. The elevation of CO<sub>2</sub> concentration acidified the bark of tree which is important for epiphytic lichen attachment. The rhizine of lichen only recognize particular pH of substrate. Changes in pH bring no growth for that particular of lichens.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion and Recommendation</title><p>CO<sub>2</sub> concentration has various effects on lichen distribution in terms of frequency and diversity. Lichen frequencies</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Lichens from FACE station, 20 m and 50 m</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-6703034x8.png"/></fig><p>are proportional with CO<sub>2</sub> concentration and lichen diversity is inversely proportional with CO<sub>2</sub> concentration as showed in this research. For further research, we should look up into lichen physiology, for example, chlorophyll a and b which are important in photosynthesis. This may give a brand new perspective and precise observation into how elevation of CO<sub>2</sub> affects on lichen physiologically.</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Frequencies distributions for each lichen species</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-6703034x9.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Lichen frequency distribution in FACE Station</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sampling Location</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >List of Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species Diversity Index (H)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Evenness (E)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >FACE Station (20 m radius)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cryptothecia striata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cryptothecia granularis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Porina tetracea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Myriotrema minutum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >50 m from FACE Station</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cryptothecia striata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >0.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cryptothecia scripta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cryptothecia granularis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Porina tetracea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Myriotrema minutum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >80 m from FACE Station</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cryptothecia striata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >1.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >0.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cryptothecia scripta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cryptothecia granularis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cryptothecia subtecta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Porina tetracea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Myriotrema minutum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crustose 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was supported by Arus Perdana Grant of AP-2013-003 and Research Development Grant of DPP- 2015-100. We would like to thank the Institute of Climate Change, UKM and Faculty of Science and Technology, UKM for providing us the accommodations and facilities throughout the study.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>A. Abas,M. S. Nizam,A. W. Aqif, (2016) Elevated CO<sub>2</sub> Effects on Lichen Frequencies and Diversity Distributions in Free-Air CO<sub>2</sub> Enrichment (FACE) Station. Journal of Environmental Protection,07,1192-1197. doi: 10.4236/jep.2016.79106</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.69831-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nimis, P.L., Scheidegger, C. and Wolseley, P.A. (2002) Monitoring with Lichens. Springer, Armsterdam.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0423-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69831-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aptroot, A. (2012) A New Folicolous Fellhaneropsis (Pilocarpaceae) from the Netherlands. The Lichenologist, 44, 441-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0024282912000011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69831-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Watson, C. (2010) Trend in World Urbanisation. Prosiding: First International Conference of Urban Pests. Springer UK, Birmingham.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69831-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khairil, M., Wan Juliana, W.A. and Nizam, M.S. (2014) Edaphic Influences on Tree Species Composition and Community Structure in a Tropical Watershed Forest in Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 26, 284-291.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69831-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nizam, M.S., Jeffri, A.R. and Latiff, A. (2013) Structure of Tree Communities and Their Association with Soil Properties in Two Fan-Palm Dominated Forests of East Coast Peninsular Malaysia. Tropical Ecology, 54, 213-226.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69831-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sipman, H. (2009) Tropical Urban Lichens: Observations from Singapore. Blumea—Biodiversity, Evolution and Biogeography of Plants, 54, 297-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/000651909X476328</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69831-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abas, A. and Awang, A. (2015) Penentuan tahap pencemaran udara di Malaysia menggunakan pendekatan penunjuk bio (Liken): Kajian kes Bandar Baru Bangi. Geografia: Malaysia Journal of Society and Space, 11, 67-74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69831-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Din, L.B., Zakaria, Z., Samsudin, M.W. and Elix, J.A. (2010) Chemical Profile of Compounds from Lichens of Bukit Larut, Peninsular Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana, 39, 901-908.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>