<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2016.714127</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-69816</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Existence of Positive Solutions to Semipositone Fractional Differential Equations
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xinsheng</surname><given-names>Du</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>School of Mathematics Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>08</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>14</issue><fpage>1484</fpage><lpage>1489</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>14</month>	<year>August</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this paper, by means of constructing a special cone, we obtain a sufficient condition for the existence of positive solution to semipositone fractional differential equation.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Fractional Differential Equations</kwd><kwd> Boundary Value Problems</kwd><kwd> Positive Solution</kwd><kwd> Semipositone</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The aim of this paper is to investigate the existence of positive solutions to the semipositone fractional differential equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula260"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the standard Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of order <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which is defined as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula261"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denotes the Euler gamma function and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denotes the integer part of number<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, provided that the right side is pointwise defined on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69816-ref1">1</xref>] . Here, by a positive solution to the problem (1), we mean a function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which is positive in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and satisfies (1).</p><p>Fractional differential equations have gained much importance and attention due to the fact that they have been proved to be valuable tools in the modelling of many phenomena in engineering and sciences such as physics, mechanics, economics and biology. In recent years, there exist a great deal of researches on the existence and/or uniqueness of solutions (or positive solutions) to boundary value problems for fractional-order differential equations. Sun [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69816-ref2">2</xref>] studied the existence of positive solutions for the following boundary value pro- blems:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula262"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is continuous and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. But paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69816-ref2">2</xref>] did not give the results of the existence of positive solution when the nonlinearity can take negative value, i.e. semipositone problems.</p><p>The purpose of the present paper is to apply the method of varying translation together with the fixed point theorems in cone to discuss (1) without nonnegativity imposed on the nonlinearity. Meanwhile, we also allow the nonlinearity to have many finite singularities on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Preliminaries and Lemmas</title><p>In this section, we present several lemmas that are useful to the proof of our main results. For the forthcoming analysis, we need the following assumptions:</p><p>(H<sub>1</sub>) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is continuous. For any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, there exist constants <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>(H<sub>2</sub>) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>will be defined in the following text.</p><p>In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69816-ref3">3</xref>] , the authors obtained the Green function associated with the problem (1). More precisely, the authors proved the following lemma.</p><p>Lemma 2.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69816-ref3">3</xref>] . For any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the unique solution of the boundary value problem</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula263"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula264"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula265"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 2.2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69816-ref4">4</xref>] . The Green function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined by (4) satisfies the inequality</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula266"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>here</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula267"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Remark 2.1. A simple computation shows that there exists a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula268"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Remark 2.2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69816-ref5">5</xref>] . If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies (H<sub>1</sub>), then for any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is increasing on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>and for any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Lemma 2.3 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69816-ref6">6</xref>] . Let X be a real Banach space, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>be a bounded open subset of X with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a completely continuous operator, where P is a cone in X.</p><p>(i) Suppose that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>(ii) Suppose that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Consider the Banach space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with the usual supremum norm <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and define the</p><p>cone<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the unique solution</p><p>to (2) for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Now we first consider the singular nonlinear boundary value problem</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula269"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> We have the following Lemma.</p><p>Lemma 2.4. If the singular nonlinear boundary value problem (2) has a positive solution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then boundary value problem (1) has a positive solution<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. In fact, if u is a positive solution to (6) such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the unique solution to (2) for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we</p><p>have<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which implies that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. So</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Consequently <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is positive solution to (1). This complete the proof of Lemma 2.4.</p><p>For any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, define an operator</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula270"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since for any fixed<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we can choose <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Note that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>so by (H<sub>1</sub>), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula271"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Consequently, for any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula272"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x87.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, the operator T is well defined and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Lemma 2.5. Assume that (H<sub>1</sub>), (H<sub>2</sub>) hold. Then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a completely continuous operator.</p><p>Proof. For any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, in view of (2) we conclude that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula273"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x91.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Whence, it follows from (8) that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which implies <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Next we show that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is continuous. Suppose<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Then, there exists a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Since for any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, by Remark 2.2, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula274"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula275"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x102.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It follows from the Lebesgue control convergence theorem that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula276"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which implies <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is continuous.</p><p>In what follows, we need to prove that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is relatively compact.</p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be any bounded set. Then there exists a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Similarly as (9), for any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula277"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x112.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Consequently</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula278"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x113.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is uniformly bounded.</p><p>Now we show that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is equicontinuous on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, by (9), (11) and the Lebesgue control convergence theorem, and noticing the continuity of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula279"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x119.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is equicontinuous on [0,1]. The Arezl&#224;-Ascoli Theorem guarantees that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is relatively compact set. Therefore <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is completely continuous operator.</p><p>Lemma 2.6. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. Assume that there exists <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Thus we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula280"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x129.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This contradiction shows that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Lemma 2.7. There exists a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. Choose constants <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and N such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula281"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x135.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From Remark (2.2), there exists<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula282"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x137.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Obviously, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Now we show that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> In</p><p>fact, otherwise, there exists <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> By (2), for any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula283"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x144.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula284"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x145.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Consequently, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>That is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> This</p><p>contradiction shows that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Main Results</title><p>Theorem 3.1. Suppose that (H<sub>1</sub>), (H<sub>2</sub>) hold. Then, the boundary value problems (1) has at least one positive solution<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x149.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and exists a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x149.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x149.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof of Theorem 3.1. Applying Lemma 2.6 and Lemma 2.7 and the definition of the fixed point index, we have <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Thus T has a fixed point <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.69816-formula285"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x157.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x158.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> It follows from Lemma (2.4) that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x158.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x159.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a positive solution to boundary value problem (1), and there exists a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x158.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x159.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x158.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x159.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-7403249x161.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank the Editor and the referee for their comments. This research was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11471187, 11571197), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China (ZR2014AL004) and the Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program (J14LI08), the Project of Scientific and Technological of Qufu Normal University (XKJ201303).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Xinsheng Du, (2016) Existence of Positive Solutions to Semipositone Fractional Differential Equations. Applied Mathematics,07,1484-1489. doi: 10.4236/am.2016.714127</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.69816-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Podlubny, I. (1999) Fractinonal Differential Equations. In: Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Vol. 198, Academic Press, San Diego.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69816-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, Y.P. and Zhao, M. (2014) Positive Solutions for a Class of Fractional Differential Equations with Integral Boundary Conditions. Applied Mathematics Letters, 34, 17-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2014.03.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69816-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, X., Chai, C. and Ge, W. (2013) Existence and Nonexistence Results for a Class of Fractional Boundary Value Problems. J. Appl. Math. Comput, 41, 17-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12190-012-0590-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69816-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yuan, C. (2010) Multiple Positive Solutions for (n-1,1)-Type Semipositione Conjugate Boundary Value Problems of Nonlinear Fractional Differential Equations. Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations, 36, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.14232/ejqtde.2010.1.36</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69816-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, X.G. and Liu, L.S. (2006) Positive Solutions of Superlinear Semipositone Singular Boundary Value Problems. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 316, 525-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.04.081</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69816-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, D.J. and Lakshmikantham, V. (1988) Nonlinear Problems in Abstract Cones. Academic Press, Boston.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>