<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1102679</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-69557</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Speciation of Trace Metals Pb, Zn, Cu and Cd in Surficial Sediment from Makupa Creek Mombasa, Coastal Kenya
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Philip</surname><given-names>K. Maritim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>N. Gachanja</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>T.</surname><given-names>M. Munyao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Chemistry, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Environmental Earth Sciences, School of Environmental Studies, Univerisity of Eldoret, Eldoret, Kenya</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>pkmaritim@yahoo.com(PKM)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>07</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>10</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>25</month>	<year>July</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Trace metals (Zn, Pb, Cu, Cd) speciation of surface sediments from Makupa creek, coastal Kenya were determined by sequential extraction procedure. The procedure was used to extract the trace metals in sediments geochemical phases (exchangeable, carbonates, Fe-Mn oxides, organic matter/sulphide, and residual). Trace metals analysis was done using ICP/MS. The trace metal speciation results indicated that Pb, Zn, and Cd were mainly associated with the exchangeable, carbonates and Fe-Mn oxides in most of the sampling sites. The highest concentration of the trace metals were associated with Fe-Mn oxides with Zn concentration at 362.5 μg/g, Pb, 31.5 μg/g. Copper was mostly associated with the organic matter/sulphide and carbonate at concentration of 117.5 μg/g and 69.9 μg/g respectively. Generally, trace metals in sediment from Makupa creek were mainly associated with the bioavailable fractions (BAF) and their ranges were: Pb (60%-98%), Zn (90%-99%), Cu (70%-91%). It was found therefore, that there was trace metals enrichment in sediments from Makupa from anthropogenic sources and bioavailable to biota. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Speciation</kwd><kwd> Sequence Extraction Procedure</kwd><kwd> Bioavailability</kwd><kwd> Trace Metals</kwd><kwd> Sediment</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Trace metals are of concerns as contaminants of water bodies because of their persistence and high toxicity to many aquatic organisms. Trace metals occurrence in most rivers binds to suspended solid and a small fraction is in the soluble form. These suspended solids sink and settle as sediments. Nature sediments are complex mixtures of various phases such as residues of weathering and erosion such as clays and other alumosilicates and iron and aluminum oxyhydroxides and sulphides, substances produced by biological activities, both organic (microorganisms, humic substances, biological detritus) and inorganic (carbonates, phosphates, silica) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref1">1</xref>] . Trace metals in sediments associate with specific phases of natural sediments by way of sorption. Therefore sediments are solids phases in aquatic environment that controls dissolved level of metals by mechanism of sorption-desorption. Surface sediments are “natural sponge” that absorb all kinds of pollutants from water and accumulate all sorts of harmful substances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref3">3</xref>] . Therefore sediments act as sink and sources of trace metals to overlying water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Monitoring of sediments contaminant is critical to tract regional trends, understand potential toxic impacts to marine resources and make management decisions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref5">5</xref>] . The sediments provide both short and long term memory of contaminant loading to the marine environment. Sediments not only provide an indication of the current quality of coastal waters but also provide important information on the transportation and fate of pollutants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref6">6</xref>] . The source of trace metals into marine environment includes river discharge, agricultural activities, urban runoff, industrial and domestic sewerage and oil spills and natural sources such as rock weathering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Trace metals can be highly toxic to various living organism while others are essential but can be toxic at high doses. Most of their toxicity depends on their particular form in which the trace metal is present in the system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref8">8</xref>] . The different forms of particular trace metals or compounds are referred to as “species”. Speciation of trace metals is defined as distribution of trace metals among defined chemical species in a system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref9">9</xref>] . It is the available forms (species) of trace metals in aquatic systems which is causing toxicity in organisms not the total concentration in the matrices. The distribution of trace metals in the sediment Phases is a better way in understanding of the metal available to biota.</p><p>The speciation of dissolved metals is relatively well understood. But there is a considerable uncertainty about the nature of the bioavailable forms of trace metals in sediments. Determination of specific chemical species in sediments is difficult and sometimes impossible [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref10">10</xref>] . The composition of sediments is very complex and variable and it’s extremely difficult to determine the bioavailability of sediment bound metals. Geochemical methods for determining the concentrations of metal binding on to sediments components and assessing the potential bioavailability of metals in the field as a consequence are based mainly on empirical and chemical extraction technique [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>This technique was first developed by Tessier in 1979 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref14">14</xref>] . It is based on the fact that trace metals in sediments are present in a wide variety of physico-chemical form or (species). The speciation of metals has a profound influence on its transport, fate and effects in the aquatic environment. The extraction procedures or fractionation of metals according to sediments phases, such as exchangeable, Bounds to carbonates, Bound to iron and magnesium oxides, Bond to organic matter and residual can be done by method of Sequential Extraction.</p><p>The Sequence extraction procedures method has been widely accepted and has been used in determining metal speciation in solid matrix [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref13">13</xref>] . It has been established from the procedures that pretreatment of samples affects metal speciation. Therefore samples should be analyzed fresh within 24 hours in order to minimize effects of samples pretreatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Makupa creek is generally shallow and is sheltered from high tidal currents. The creek has been used as a domestic and industrial dumping site for the last forty years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref15">15</xref>] . The wastes from harbor activities at Fort Reitz creek which includes waste from petroleum and other pollutants mainly end up at Makupa creek which acts as their sink because of its enclosed nature and low flushing rate of its waters during tidal cycles.</p><p>Trace metals studies on surface sediments from the creek shows a significant increase of total trace metals concentration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref17">17</xref>] . But these studies on trace metals at Makupa creek are only limited to total metal concentrations in sediments. Total trace metal content in sediments provide a simple means of expressing a measure of pollution, it has been pointed out by numerous report that this measures are deficient in predicting the toxicity of these pollutants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref6">6</xref>] . Therefore the aim of this study is to determine the concentrations of trace metals (Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd) in Makupa creek sediments phases. It is hypothesize that trace metals in Makupa creek sediments are not available to biota.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The study area is located within Mombasa county in Kenya and its specific location is defined by latitude 39˚38'E, and longitude 4˚02'S (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The area has a tropical climate with two seasons, dry in January/Feb- ruary and wet in April/May. The total annual precipitations is 1072.7 mm. The yearly average temperature is 26.30˚C. To the north of the creek is Makupa causeway which occurs between it and Tudor Creek blocking their waters from mixing. To the south of the study area is Port Reizt where Kilindini harbor is situated and is separated by Kipevu Bridge channel. At high tide water from Port Reitz flows over to Makupa Creek and at low tide the water flows back to the sea. To the western side of the creek its borders Kiparani Dump site. Because of its enclose nature of the creek there is less flushing water by sea waves. Therefore the creek act as a sink of pollutants from the town rain water runoff, shipping activities at Kilindini harbor at port Reitz creek as well leachate and discharge from the Kibarani dumping site.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sampling</title><p>Surface sediment samples were collected in duplicate using 32 mm diameter corer. Two samples were collected from each of the seven identified sample sites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) between April and Oct 2013. Sampling was done dur- ing low tides in order to access the sediment easily. At each of the sampling sites the top 1 - 5 cm sediment were extruded using corer piston on to a polyethylene sheet. Using plastic spoon, large stones and debris were re-</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Makupa creek sampling sites (1-7)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69557x6.png"/></fig><p>moved and the samples wet sieved through &lt;63 &#181;m polyethylene sieves to obtained homogeneous sample. After sieving the samples were transferred into a labeled plastic bag and place in an ice box at 4˚C for transporting them the laboratory. At the laboratory the sample were divided into three sub samples. The subsamples were used for determination of moisture content, total metal extraction by acid digestion, and sequential extraction procedures. The samples for sequential extraction procedures were done on wet sediments immediately on arriving at the laboratory. Samples for total metal concentration were air dried and digested with aqua regia acid.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Moisture Content Determination</title><p>The moisture contents of the samples were determined by weighing aproximately1g of the samples and placing them in an oven at 100˚C over nite. This was used to calculate the equivalent dry weight of each samples.</p><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Total Metals Extraction Procedures</title><p>All reagent used for extraction and analysis were analytical grade.</p><p>For total metal extraction, air dried 1 g aliquots were weighed into Teflon beakers to which 6ml of nitric was added and shaken gently for 2 minute and finally 3 ml of hydrochloric acid were added. The beakers were transferred on to a hot plate at 86˚C and heated for 3 hours until no brown fumes evolved and occasionally adding drop of nitric acids in order not to allow the beakers to dry. On cooling the solution were filtered with Whiteman 45 um filter paper and made to 20 ml in a volumetric flask. The samples were kept cool at 4˚C until analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Sequential Extraction Procedure</title><p>An equivalent of 1g dry weigth of sediment were weighed into plastic centrifuge tubes for the extraction. The Sequential extraction procedure is summarised in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Sample Analysis</title><p>Trace metal analysis was done using an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP/MS) model ELAN 900 Perkin Elmer, equipped with Perkin Elmer AS91 auto sampler. ICP/MS analysis was done using external calibration. The calibration standard solution was prepared from 1000 ug/g stock solution. The results for the calibration are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Five fractions Sequence extraction procedure</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fraction</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Geochemical phases</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Extraction Reagent/Condition</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exchangeable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 ml, IM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, adjust pH with Acetic acid to pH 7, shake for 1 hr, room temp. (Mechanical shaker Julabo sw-20c was used)<sup>*</sup> (see note)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bound to carbonate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 ml, 1 M sodium acetate, added drops of Acetic acid for PH adjustment to PH 5, shaken for 5 hrs at room temp (Mechanical shaker Julabo sw-20c was used)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bound to iron and manganese oxide</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 ml, 1 M Hydroxylamine hydrochloride + 25% V/V acetic acid, PH2, 96˚C, Shaken for 3hrs (Mechanical shaker Julabo sw-20c was used)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bound to organic matter and sulphides</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 ml, 30% hydrogen peroxide Add added drop wise allowing initial reaction to subsidies then add 3 ml, 0.02M nitric acid, pH 2, heat for 5 hrs at 80˚C, occasionally shaking</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residual</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Digested with 20 ml 1:3 HCL acid:Nitric acid (aqua regia) for 3hrs in Teflon beakers</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Note: For every fraction extracted the extracts were centrifuge at 3000 rpm for 20 min and the supernatants decanted into a 20 ml volumetric flask and made to the mark with extraction reagent. The residue water rinsed with 8 ml of deionized water and the decanted before adding the extraction reagent of the next step. The 20 ml extract was kept at 4˚C until analysis.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Standard Calibration results (ng/ml)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Calibration standard (ng/ml)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >10</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >50</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >100</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >200</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >500</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metal</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.914</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >202.038</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >498.658</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.914</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.605</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >196.051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >498.790</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.893</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.404</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >203.210</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >499.146</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >201.541</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >499.515</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>Quality Control Analysis<p>For all the sampling sites, the total metals concentration of each metal obtained by acid digestion is compared with total metal obtained by sequence extraction procedures in order to evaluate the accuracy of the methodology. The results of the sum of concentration of each metal in sediment phases (fraction) in sequential extraction agreed to within with &#177;20% the independently determined total metal concentrations by acid digestion, supporting the overall accuracy of extraction procedure (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>The geochemical phases/fraction are Exchangeable (F1), Carbonates (F2), Fe-Mn oxides (F3), organic matter/sulphide (F4), residual (F5). Figures 2-5 shows graphs of distribution of the trace metals among the geochemical phases by each site. The percentage of the Bioavalable fraction (BAF) and Non Bioavialale fraction (NBAF) of the trace metals Pb, Zn, Cu, and Cd, by site are presented in Figures 6-9. The BAF the sum of Exchangeable, Carbonates, Reducible (Fe-Mn oxides ) and NBAF sum of organic matter/sulphide and residual was determine by method by Young [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Lead Pb</title><p>The results for lead distribution in the geochemical phases per site is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. Lead appears to be well</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage distribution of Pb in each geochemical fraction by site</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69557x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage distribution of Zn in each geochemical fraction by site</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69557x8.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage distribution of Cu in each geochemical fraction by site</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69557x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage distribution of Cd in geochemical fractionsby site</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69557x10.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of Pb in BAF and NBAF by site</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69557x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage distribution of Zn in BAF and NBAF by site</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69557x12.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage distribution of Pb in BAF and NBAF by site</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69557x13.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage recoveries of acid digestion and Sequential extraction methods by site</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sites</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Pb</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Zn</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Cu</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Cd</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acid dig. ng/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sequent Extr. ng/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Reco.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acid Diges. ng/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seque. Extr. ng/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Recoveries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acid Diges. ng/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seque. Extraction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Recoveries</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acid Diges ng/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seque Extracting/ml</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% Recoveries</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 MS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1621.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1580.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4284.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4422.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1612.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1469.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 ms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >769.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >816.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2910.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2435.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >631.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >857.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 ms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1219.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1048.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6917.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6096.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1175.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1044.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 ms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2441.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2567.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10244.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3741.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16240.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1586</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.562</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 ms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1233.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1685.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4997.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5297</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1171.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1288.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 ms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >953.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >941.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9690</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7699.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8775</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6829</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 ms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >341.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >364.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1631</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >487.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >521.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage distribution of PB in BAF and NBAF by site</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69557x14.png"/></fig><p>distributed among the seven sites. The concentrations of lead in high in exchangeable and reducible fractions among the sites with the residual being the lowest. The highest concentration of Pb was at site 1 in Fe-Mn oxides phase (31.5 &#181;g/g). This is consistence with the results obtained by other authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref19">19</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref21">21</xref>] . This could be due to formation of stable complexes with Fe and Mn oxides. The metal in this fraction may be release into the reducable phase if the sediment is subjected to more reducing conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref23">23</xref>] . A major source of lead input into the creek at the sites 1 could be deposition of waste from Mombasa harbor and traffic crossing Kibevu bridge. At site where there are death mangroves is the Kibarani damp sites which discharges leachate into the creek at site 4 hence increase lead concentrations. The percentage of the bioavailable Fraction (BAF) and Non bioavailable fraction (NBAF) of lead in sediment at each site is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. At site1, 2, 6 and 7 the bioavailable and non bioavailable fractions of lead were over 90% respectively. The high percentage of Pb lead in the bioavalable fraction means that the sources of lead in Makupa creek sediments is from anthropogenic sources.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Zinc Zn</title><p>The distribution of Zn in geochemical phase by site is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. Zinc appears is well distributed in Makupa creek. It is mainly associated with Fe-Mn oxides, exchangeable, and carbonates fractions in most of the sites. The highest concentration of Zn was in site 7 bounded on Fe-Mn oxides fraction (F3) 362.5 &#181;g/g followed by site 5 and 4, with 288.2 &#181;g/g (F1) and 234.6 &#181;g/g (F3) respectively. The high concentration of Zn was found to associate with Fe-Mn-oxides fraction in the Makupa creek. This is not unusually because Zn adsorbed on these oxides has high stability constants than carbonate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref18">18</xref>] . High percentage of Zn has been found to associate with Fe-Mn oxides in other studies of polluted sediments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>The presence high concentration of Zn in the first four fractions (F1, F2, F3) at site 4 and 5 could be due to leaching from Kibarani Dumpsite situated at the shore of the creek. At the dumpsite, sewage and solid waste are deposed and during raining seasons, runoff and leachate from it enters Makupa creek at the two sites. At site 7 the concentration of Zn is high in F3 this could be attributed to iurban effluent discharge observed at the site from areas around Maritini urban. The percentage distribution of Zn among the geochemical phases at each site is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>. The chemical partitioning of Zn is mainly hosted by the BAF in most of the sites except in site 5 which indicate high percentage of Zn in the NBAF. Therefore the high percentage of Zn in BAF could be due to anthropogenic sources into the creek.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Cupper Cu</title><p>At site 6, is an entry of urban ruoff from Maritini into the creek. These runoff migth be containing high organic content. Cupper in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> is mainly bound in organic/sulphide fraction (F3). This is due to its stable organic- copper complexes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref26">26</xref>] . Several studies have also reported high concentration of Cu bounded with organic matter in sediments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref27">27</xref>] . Copper bioavailabilty in makupa creek is less than for Pb and Zn although the percentage of copper in the bioavailable fraction BAF and those in NBAF are almost in equal ratios.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Cadmium Cd</title><p>Cadmium apeared to be below detection limit in most of the sites. This trend was also observed by Muohi, on total metal concentration studies in makupa sediments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref16">16</xref>] . The concetration of Cd in all the geochemical phases is below the detection limit as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, except in carbonate fraction F3 in site 4. The Cd at this site is bioavailable since the carbonate represent the portion of the metal that can be easily mobilized by changes in pH and salinity. At site 4 the leaching from the dumpsite is dischared to the creek. Therefore the presence of Cd at this site is possibly due to the waste depositedsed in the creek.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The trace metal speciation results showed that Pb, Zn, and Cd were mainly associated with the exchangeable, carbonates and Fe-Mn oxides in most of the sampling sites in the study area. Copper was mostly associated with the organic matter/sulphide at only site 6 but on other sites it followed the same pattern like the other metals. This feature for copper may be due to large flux of organic matter from the urban runoff. It has been found that Pb, Zn, and Cu are the major contaminant in the sediments confirming earlier report by Muohi et al. during the studies of total metal concentration in sediments from Makupa creek [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69557-ref16">16</xref>] . The presence of high concentration of metals in the Bioavailable fractions at site 4 and 5 indicate that the Kibarani dumpsite is the major contributor of pollutant to Makupa creek. Therefore, it can be concluded that metals speciation studies have identified the potential pollution sources in this creek which could have been missed in total metals studies.</p><p>The trace metals in sediment of Makupa creek were mainly associated with the bioavailable fractions BAF at ranges of Pb (60% - 98%, Zn (90% - 99%), Cu (70% - 91%). This confirms that there is high risk of metals poisoning to biota in the creek. Fishing is done by the local communities living around the creek hence exposing themselves to metal toxicity. Further studies is necessary to determine viable mitigation measures against the risks posed by high levels of trace metals in the sediment and the levels of the metals in aquatic organism living the area.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>I wish to thanks the Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institutes for allowing me to use their laboratories, Moi University research grants for funding the research and my employer University of Eldoret for facilitating my research.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Philip K. Maritim,A. N. Gachanja,T. M. Munyao, (2016) Speciation of Trace Metals Pb, Zn, Cu and Cd in Surficial Sediment from Makupa Creek Mombasa, Coastal Kenya. Open Access Library Journal,03,1-10. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1102679</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.69557-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tessier, A. and Turner, D.R. (1995) Metal Speciation and Bioavailability in Aquatic Systems, IUPAC Series on Analytical Chemistry of Environmental Systems. John Wilend and Sons.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baran, S. and Polesszcuk, A.L. (2002) Trace Metal and PAhs in Surface Sediments from River Narew Poland. Police Journal of Environmental Studies, 11, 299-305.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pueyo, M., Rauret, G., Luck, D., Yli-Hall, M., Muntau, H., Querauller, Ph. and Lopez San Chez, J.F. (2001) Exratification of the Extract Actable Contents of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn in Freshwater Sediments Following a Collaborative Tested and Optimize Tree Step Sequential Procedure. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 3, 243-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b010235k</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muohi, A.W., Onyari, J.M., Omodi, J.G. and Mavuti, K.M. (2003) Heavy Metals Distribution in Surface Sediments from Mtwapa and Shirazi Creeks, Kenya Coast. Bulletin of the Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 70, 1220-1227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-003-0112-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, X.D., Shen, N.D., Wai, W.H.O. and Li, Y.S. (2001) Chemical Forms of Pb, Zn, and Cu in Sediments Profile of the Pearl River Estuarine. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42, 215-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00145-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramirex, M., Serena, M., Frache, R. and Correa, J. (2005) Metal Speciation and Environmental Impact on Sandy Beaches Due to El Salvador Copper Mine, Chile. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50, 62-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.08.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fan, W., Wang, W.X., Chen, J., Li, X.D. and Yen, Y.-F. (2003) Cu, Ni, and Pb Speciation in Surface Sediment from a Contaminated Bay of North China. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 44, 816-832.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, K.P., Mohan, D., Singh, V.K. and Malik, A. (2005) Studies on Distribution and Fractionation of Heavy Metals in Gomi River Sediments—A Tributary of Ganges. India Journal of Hydrology, 312, 14-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.01.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yuan, C., Shi, J., He, B., Liu, J., Liang, L. and Jiang, G. (2004) Speciation of Heavy Metals in Marine Sediments from East China Sea by ICP-MS with Seguential Extraction. Environment International, 30, 749-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.01.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peng, S.H., Wang, W.X., Li, X.D. and Yen, Y.F. (2004) Metal Partitioning in River Sediments Measured by Sequentaial Extraction and Biometic Approaches. Chemosphere, 57, 839-851.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bryn, J. and Turki, A. (1997) Distribution and Speciation of Heavy Metals in Surficial Sediments from the Tees Estuarine, North-East Engiland. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 34, 768-779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(97)00047-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Turki</surname><given-names> J.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Metal Speciation (Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn) in Sediments from Al Shabab Lagoon, Jeddah, South Arabia</article-title><source> JKAU: Marine Science</source><volume> 18</volume>,<fpage> 191</fpage>-<lpage>210</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdallah</surname><given-names> M.A.M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Speciation of Trace Metals in Coastal Sediments of Ell-Mex Bay South Mediterenian Sea-West of Alexandria (Egypt)</article-title><source> Environmental Monitoring and Assessment</source><volume> 132</volume>,<fpage> 111</fpage>-<lpage>123</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamau, J.N. (2001) Heavy Metals Distribution in Sediments along the Kilindini and Makupa Greek, Kenya. Journal of Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 458.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muohi, A.W., Onyari, J.M., Omodi, J.G. and Mavuti, K.M. (2003) Heavy Metals in Sediments from Makupa and Port-Reitz Greek Systems: Kenya Coast. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 20, 113-121.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamau, J.N. (2002) Heavy Metals Distribution and Enrichment at Port-Reitz Creek, Mombasa, Western Indian Ocean. J. Mar. Sa., INQ, 65-77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tessier, P.G., Campelll, C. and Bisson, M. (1979) Sequential Extraction Procedure for the Speciation of Particulate Trace Metals. Analytical Chemistry, 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac50043a017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Savvides, C., Padupoulos, A., Halambus, K.J. and Loizdous, M. (1995) Sea Sediments Contamination with Heavy Metals, Metal Speciation and Removal. Water Science and Technology, 32, 65-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nusa, P., Milacia, R. and Marjan, V. (2001) Use of the BCR Three-Step Sequential Extraction Procedures for the Study of the Partitioning of Cd, Pb, and Zn in Various Soil Samples. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 1, 25-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, S.Z., Wang, S.X. and Shan, X.Q. (2001) Effects of Sample Pretreatment upon the Metal Speciation in Sediments by a Sequential Extraction Procedure. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability, 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3184/095422901782775435</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, B., Wang, Q.Q., Huang, B.L. and Li, S.P. (2001) Evaluation of the Results from Quasi-Tessier’s Sequential Extraction Procedure for Heavy Metals Speciation in Soils and Sediments by ICP-MS. Analytical Science, 17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IUPAC (2000) Guidelines for Terms Related to Chemical Peciation and Fractionation of Elements, Definition, Structural, Aspects and Methodoly Approach. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 72, 1453-1470.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Groot, K., Zshuppe, H. and Salomns, W. (1982) Standization of Methods of Analysis for Heavy Metal in Sediment. Hydrobiologia, 92, 689-695. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00940158</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Machiwa</surname><given-names> J.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1992</year>)<article-title>Heavy Metal Content in Coastal Sediments off da res Salaam, Tanzania</article-title><source> Environmenta International</source><volume> 18</volume>,<fpage> 409</fpage>-<lpage>415</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibhadon, A.O., Wright, P. and Daniels, R. (2004) Trace Metals Speciation and Contamination in an Intertidal Estuarine. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 6, 679-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b315954j</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kwon, Y.-T. and Lee, C.-W. (2001) Sediment Metal Speciation for the Ecology Risk Assessment. Analytical Science, 17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69557-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ekpo, B.O. and Ihok, U.J. (1998) Seasonal Variation and Partition of Trace Metals (Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Cd and Pb) in Surface Sediments’ Relationship with Physio-Chemical Variables of Water from the Calabar River South Eastern Nigeria. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 20, 113-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006528324687</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>