<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1102269</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-69000</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Optimization of Macrobending Loss in Small and Large Mode Area Photonic Crystal Fibers
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Faramarz</surname><given-names>E. Seraji</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samira</surname><given-names>Kasiri</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Computer and Electrical Eng. Dept., Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Optical Communication Group, Iran Telecom Research Center, Tehran, Iran</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>feseraji@gmail.com(FES)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>12</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>6</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>13</month>	<year>December</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   Use of low bend loss optical fibers in fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) networks becomes unavoidable to improve the optical networks performance. One of the candidates is photonic crystal fibers (PCFs) for their low bend loss properties. This paper presents procedures for optimization of the bend loss of PCFs with small and large mode areas by using solvers Softwares Rsoft and Optifiber. The optimizations are performed with respect to bend radius, core radius, photonic crystal pitch and the ratio of air-filling factor. The lowest bend loss of 1 dB/cm was obtained at bend radius of 56 mm and core diameter of 22 micrometer. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Optimization</kwd><kwd> Macrobending Loss</kwd><kwd> Photonic Crystal Fibers</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In the past decade, fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) has attracted attention of researchers for its applications in optical networks to meet the ever-increasing demands to improve the networks performance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69000-ref1">1</xref>] . To implement the FTTH technology, bend insensitive single-mode fibers have become popular for their small bend radii of 5 mm with low bend losses. For a high performance network, the bend loss of less than 0.1 dB/m is required [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69000-ref2">2</xref>] . A good number of methods are suggested to reduce the bending losses of single-mode fibers, which include uses of depressed cladding [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69000-ref3">3</xref>] , low index trench [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69000-ref4">4</xref>] , reduced mode field diameter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69000-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Photonic crystal fibers (PCFs) with their peculiar properties and structures have been the subject of considerable researches for various applications in optical system, specifically in FTTH [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69000-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69000-ref7">7</xref>] . The structures of PCFs are more flexible compared to the conventional single-mode fibers when designing for low bend losses fibers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69000-ref8">8</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69000-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>In this paper, for determination of PCF cladding index, solver softwares Optifiber and Rsoft are employed. In every step of simulations, by varying the diameter and pitch of the air-holes, the effective index of PCF cladding is calculated at wavelength 1550 nm. In each stage of our calculation, the effective refractive index of the cladding of PCFs is approximated with a step-index single-mode fiber. The macrobending losses of each modeled PCF for different bend radii and core diameters are determined at wavelength 1550 nm. However, while considering different core diameters, the attention was focused on single-mode operation of the modeled PCFs. The optimization of macrobending losses of PCFs was performed for core diameter, bend radius, and air filling factor. It was observed that by increasing air-hole diameter d or increasing the pitch <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the PCFs with constant ratio of air filling factor<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the effective index of the PCFs would accordingly increase. In addition, when the value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> increases, the effective index of cladding will reduce.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Large Mode Area PCF</title><p>A large mode area (LMA) PCF with hexagonal cross-section of six rings of air-holes with triangular lattice in the cladding is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denotes the spacing between the air-holes, d represents air- hole diameter, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denotes the air filling factor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69000-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.69000-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>The variation of macrobending loss of the PCF for different core diameters in terms of the bend radius is plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. We note that the highest core diameter of the LMA-PCF to support single-mode operation is found to be 13 mm. The value of effective cladding index is found to be 1.4473.</p><p>By considering two cases of choosing values for the air-hole diameter d and the pitch<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the air-filling factor ratio <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> varies, and accordingly for each case of varying d (or<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) whilst keeping the other constant, the effective index of the cladding is determined for equivalent model of step-index SMF for LMA-PCF. The results of the calculations are tabulated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>For different bend radius and air-hole diameters, the macrobending losses are calculated and the corresponding results are illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b) for the core radius <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, respectively, at wavelength 1550 nm.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> PCF with hexagonal cross-section of six rings of air-holes with triangular arrangement</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x16.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The calculated effective index of cladding for different and constant values of d and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Case 1: d is constant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4473</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4485</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4453</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4437</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Case 2: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is constant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4477</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4468</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4465</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.77</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The variation of macrobending loss of the LMA-PCF as a function of the bend radius for different core diameters at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x23.png"/></fig><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of macrobending losses as a function of bend radius for different values of air-hole diameter at (a) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and (b) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>at wavelength 1550 nm.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x26.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>We note that for a specified macrobending loss at a given air-hole diameter, when core radius increases, the required bend radius would decrease. In addition, at specified core radius of the PCF, when air-hole diameter increases, the bend radius will decrease. In General, for higher values of the core diameter, almost the same macrobending losses are obtained at lower bending radii.</p><p>The investigation on effect of variations of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on macrobending losses is plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> for the core radius of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at a constant air-hole diameter of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and wavelength of 1550 nm.</p><p>The results in this case indicate that with a constant value of d, when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> increases, the macrobending loss would also increase. On the comparison with the results in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, under similar condition, the level of macrobending losses has considerably reduced.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Small Mode Area PCF</title><p>With a similar structure, as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, a PCF with a small mode area (SMA) is considered in the first case with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and varying<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and in second case with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and varying d. By modal analysis of SMA-PCF, the highest core diameter to guarantee single-mode operation is found to be 4.2 mm. With variations of core radius and for a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the macrobending losses are calculated and drawn as a function of bend radius, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> The effect of variations of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on macrobending losses for the core radius of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at a constant air-hole diameter of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and wavelength of 1550 nm.</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x39.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> The variation of macrobending loss in terms of bend radius for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x44.png"/></fig><p>We note that the macrobending loss in SMA-PCF is much less than that of the fiber LMA-PCF. By considering a constant range of macrobending loss, the variation range of the LMA-PCF is about 30 times higher than the SMA-PCF. The calculated effective index for different d and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> values are tabulated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>For SMA-PCFs, the variations of macrobending losses in terms of bend radius for different values of d are plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. For each case, the value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is kept constant at 2.1 mm, while the air-hole radius was varied from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. By increasing air-hole diameter up to 1.17 mm, macrobending losses, with respect to bend radius, would reduce, but by further increase of d has opposite effect, such that from<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the level of macrobending loss would increase, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. Further, when the core radius increases, the macrobending loss will decrease.</p><p>In addition, the effects of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the macrobending loss is investigated and the results are plotted against bend radius for constant<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It worth to note that in this case when the pitch <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> goes to higher levels, the macrobending loss would also increase, simultaneously, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>This paper presents simulation of two proposed photonic crystal fibers to optimize the macrobending losses at different parametric conditions by using solvers softwares Rsoft and Optifiber. The smallest bend radius for</p><fig-group id="fig6"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> The variations of macrobending losses of SMA-PCFs in terms of bend radius for different values of d (a) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and (b) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>at wavelength 1550 nm.</title></caption><fig id ="fig6_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x56.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig7"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> The effects of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the macrobending loss against bend radius for constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at (a) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</title></caption><fig id ="fig7_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x59.png"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The calculated effective index of SMA-PCF for different values of d and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Case 1: d is constant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4229</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.945</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.945</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.945</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3872</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.945</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Case 2: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is constant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4279</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.765</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4270</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.170</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4189</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.300</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SMA-PCF with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and core radius of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> were obtained at bending radius of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/69000x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> At this bend radius, the macrobending loss was less than 1 dB/m. In case of LMA-PCF, for 1 dB/m macrobending loss, the bend radius is 56 mm and the core diameter is found to be 22 mm.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Faramarz E. Seraji,Samira Kasiri, (2015) Optimization of Macrobending Loss in Small and Large Mode Area Photonic Crystal Fibers. Open Access Library Journal,02,1-6. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1102269</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.69000-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wagner, R.E., Igel, J.R., Whitman, R., Vaughn, M.D., Ruffin, A.B. and Bickham, S. (2006) Fiber-Based Broadband-Access Deployment in the United States. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 24, 4526-4540.http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2006.886067</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69000-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, D.Z., Belben, W.R., Gallup, J.B., Mazzali, C., Dainese, P. and Rhyne, T. (2008) Requirements for Bend Insensitive Fibers for Verizon’s FiOS and FTTH Applications. OFCNFOEC2008, San Diego, 24-28 February 2008, 1-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69000-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, F., et al. (2006) A New G.652D, Zero Water Peak Fiber Optimized for Low Bend Sensitivity in Access Networks. Proceedings of 55th IWCS-2006, International Wire and Cable Symposium, Providence, 12-15 November 2006, 348-356.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69000-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matsuo, M.I. and Himeno, K. (2004) Bend-Insensitive and Low-Splice Loss Optical Fiber for Indoor Wiring in FTTH. Proceedings of Optical Communication Conference, Los Angeles, 22 February 2004, Paper ThI3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69000-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ITU-T Recommendation G.652.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69000-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakajima, K., Hogari, K., Zhou, J., Tajima, K. and Sankawa, I. (2003) Hole Assisted Fiber Design for Small Bending and Splice Losses. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 15, 1737-1739.http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2003.819723</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69000-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bing, Y., Ohsono, K., Kurosawa, Y., Kumagai, T. and Tachikura, M. (2005) Low-Loss Holey Fiber. Hitachi Cable Review, No. 24, 1-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69000-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luo, W.Y., Li, S.Y., Chen, W., Wang, D.X. and Mo, Q. (2012) Low-Loss Bending-Insensitive Micro-Structured Optical Fiber for FTTH. Proceedings of 61st IWCS Conference, International Wire &amp; Cable Symposium, Rhode Island Convention Center, Providence, 11-14 November 2012, 454-457.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69000-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guan, N., Izoe, K., Takenaga, K., Suzuki, R., Aikawa, K. and Himeno, K. (2006) Holey Fibers for Low Bending Loss. IEICE Transactions on Electronics, E89-C, 191-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ietele/e89-c.2.191</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69000-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nielsen, M.D., Mortensen, N.A., Albertsen, M., Folkenberg, J.R., Bjarklev, A. and Bonacinni, D. (2004) Predicting Macrobending Loss for Large-Mode Area Photonic Crystal Fibers. Optics Express, 12, 1775-1779.http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.12.001775</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69000-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ademgil, H. and Haxha, S. (2011) Bending Insensitive Large Mode Area Photonic Crystal Fiber. Optik, 122, 1950-1956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2010.09.048</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.69000-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, X., Lou, S.Q. and Lu, W.L. (2013) Bending Orientation Insensitive Large Mode Area Photonic Crystal Fiber with Triangular Core. IEEE Photonics Journal, 5, Article ID: 7100408.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>