<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2016.712114</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-68983</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Effect of Variations in Ionic Conductance Values on the Dynamics of a Mathematical Model of Non-Spiking A-Type Horizontal Cells in the Rabbit Retina
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Takaaki</surname><given-names>Shirahata</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Institute of Neuroscience and Kagawa School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokushima Bunri University, 
Sanuki, Japan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>07</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1297</fpage><lpage>1302</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>22</month>	<year>July</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A previous study proposed a mathematical model of A-type horizontal cells in the rabbit retina. This model, which was constructed based on the Hodgkin-Huxley model, was described by a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations. The model contained five types of voltage-dependent ionic conductances: sodium, calcium, delayed rectifier potassium, transient outward potassium, and anomalous rectifier potassium conductances. The previous study indicated that when the delayed rectifier potassium conductance had a small value, depolarizing stimulation could change the dynamic state of the model from a hyperpolarized steady state to a depolarized steady state. However, how this change was affected by variations in the ionic conductance values was not clarified in detail in the previous study. To clarify this issue, in the present study, we performed numerical simulation analysis of the model and revealed the differences among the five types of ionic conductances.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Mathematical Model</kwd><kwd> Numerical Simulation</kwd><kwd> A-Type Horizontal Cell</kwd><kwd> Ionic Conductance</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>A-type horizontal cells in the rabbit retina are classified into two types: one type can generate repetitive spiking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref1">1</xref>] , and the other cannot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref2">2</xref>] . Mathematical modeling studies of these cells based on the Hodgkin-Huxley model have been reported (e.g., simulations of the spiking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref3">3</xref>] and nonspiking cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref2">2</xref>] ). Each of the mathematical models of the spiking and non-spiking cells is described by a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs), and contains five types of voltage-dependent ionic conductances: sodium, calcium, delayed rectifier potassium, transient outward potassium, and anomalous rectifier potassium conductances. However, the only difference between the mathematical models of the spiking and non-spiking cells is that the former takes a larger value of the delayed rectifier potassium conductance than the latter. In particular, a study by Aoyama et al. focused on the relationship between the dynamics of the non-spiking cell model and ionic conductances [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref2">2</xref>] . Although this study investigated the effect of a decrease in the sodium, calcium, and transient outward potassium conductances on the dynamics of the non-spiking cell model, it did not examine the effect of a decrease in other ionic conductances such as the anomalous rectifier potassium conductance. It also did not investigate the effect of an increase in the five types of ionic conductances. Detailed analysis of membrane conductance is very important [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref4">4</xref>] , and so it is necessary to systematically investigate the effect of not only a decrease but also an increase in the five types of ionic conductances on the dynamics of the non-spiking cell model. This systematic investigation will contribute to a detailed understanding of the characteristics of the ionic conductances of this model. Therefore, the present study performed numerical simulation to evaluate the effect of variations in the five types of ionic conductances on the dynamics of the non-spiking cell model.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The present study performed numerical simulations of a mathematical model of a rabbit A-type retinal horizontal cell that does not generate repetitive spiking (the non-spiking cell model), which was developed previously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref2">2</xref>] . The model is described by a system of nonlinear ODEs, which consist of eight state variables: the membrane potential of the horizontal cell [V (mV)] and seven gating variables of ionic currents (m<sub>Na</sub>, h<sub>Na</sub>, m<sub>Ca</sub>, m<sub>Kv</sub>, h<sub>Kv</sub>, m<sub>A</sub>, and h<sub>A</sub>). The time evolution of these state variables is described as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula616"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula617"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula618"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula619"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula620"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula621"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula622"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula623"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula624"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where C<sub>m</sub> (=0.106 nF) is the membrane capacitance, I<sub>app</sub> is the externally injected current of constant amplitude, I<sub>Na</sub> (V, m<sub>Na</sub>, h<sub>Na</sub>), I<sub>Ca</sub> (V, m<sub>Ca</sub>), I<sub>Kv</sub> (V, m<sub>Kv</sub>, h<sub>Kv</sub>), I<sub>A</sub> (V, m<sub>A</sub>, h<sub>A</sub>), I<sub>Ka</sub> (V), and I<sub>L</sub> (V) are the sodium, calcium, delayed rectifier potassium, transient outward potassium, anomalous rectifier potassium, and leakage currents, respectively, which are defined in the Equations (9)-(14) below.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula625"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula626"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula627"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula628"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula629"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68983-formula630"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where g<sub>Na</sub>, g<sub>Ca</sub>, g<sub>Kv</sub>, g<sub>A</sub>, g<sub>Ka</sub>, and g<sub>L</sub> (=0.5 nS) are the maximal conductances of I<sub>Na</sub> (V, m<sub>Na</sub>, h<sub>Na</sub>), I<sub>Ca</sub> (V, m<sub>Ca</sub>), I<sub>Kv</sub> (V, m<sub>Kv</sub>, h<sub>Kv</sub>), I<sub>A</sub> (V, m<sub>A</sub>, h<sub>A</sub>), I<sub>Ka</sub> (V), and I<sub>L</sub> (V), respectively, E<sub>Na</sub> (=55 mV), E<sub>Ca</sub> (=12.9log[2000/30] mV), E<sub>K</sub> (=−80 mV), and E<sub>L</sub> (=−80 mV) are the reversal potentials of I<sub>Na</sub> (V, m<sub>Na</sub>, h<sub>Na</sub>), I<sub>Ca</sub> (V, m<sub>Ca</sub>), three types of potassium currents [i.e., I<sub>Kv</sub> (V, m<sub>Kv</sub>, h<sub>Kv</sub>), I<sub>A</sub> (V, m<sub>A</sub>, h<sub>A</sub>), and I<sub>Ka</sub>(V)], and I<sub>L</sub> (V), respectively. Refer to reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref2">2</xref>] for detailed explanations of the equations.</p><p>The free and open-source software Scilab (http://www.scilab.org/) was used to numerically solve the above ODEs (initial conditions: V = −80 mV, m<sub>Na</sub> = 0.026, h<sub>Na</sub> = 0.922, m<sub>Ca</sub> = 0.059, m<sub>Kv</sub> = 0.139, h<sub>Kv</sub> = 0.932, m<sub>A</sub> = 0.030, and h<sub>A</sub> = 0.998). The total simulation time was 10 s in all the simulations. The values of the following system parameters were varied: I<sub>app</sub>, g<sub>Na</sub>, g<sub>Ca</sub>, g<sub>Kv</sub>, g<sub>A</sub>, and g<sub>Ka</sub>. I<sub>app</sub> between 0.5 and 10 s was varied from 13 to 19 pA at an interval of 1 pA, while I<sub>app</sub> between 0.0 and 0.5 s was fixed to be zero. Default values of g<sub>Na</sub>, g<sub>Ca</sub>, g<sub>Kv</sub>, g<sub>A</sub>, and g<sub>Ka</sub> were 2.4, 9.0, 4.5, 15.0, and 4.5 nS, respectively. Each ofg<sub>Na</sub>, g<sub>Ca</sub>, g<sub>Kv</sub>, g<sub>A</sub>, and g<sub>Ka</sub> was varied to 50 or 150% of each default value.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The previous study investigated the responses of the non-spiking cell model to depolarizing stimulations of different conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref2">2</xref>] . In particular, the model does not show a positive potential in response to a stimulation of 10 pA, but does show one in response to a stimulation of 25 pA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref2">2</xref>] . Based on these results, the present study first investigated in detail the responses of the model to depolarizing stimulations with amplitudes between these two values. In particular, the present study focused on the responses to stimulations between 13 and 19 pA under conditions in which all the ionic conductances were set to be default values. When the amplitudes were 13 and 14 pA, the model slightly depolarized, but it maintained a hyperpolarized steady state (i.e., it did not reach a positive potential) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). In contrast, when the amplitudes were 15 pA or more, the model depolarized and finally reached a depolarized steady state (i.e., it did reach a positive potential) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). In addition, the larger the amplitude, the faster the membrane potential reached a positive potential. Based on these results, the present study defined that the stimulation threshold for the induction of a positive potential was 15 pA.</p><p>The present study next investigated how variations in each ionic conductance value changed the stimulation threshold in order to reveal the relationship between the ionic conductances and the dynamics of the model. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the influence of variations in the ionic conductance values on the dynamics of the model. Under conditions in which g<sub>Na</sub> was 50% of the default value with the other conductance values being default values, the model showed a hyperpolarized steady state in response to stimulations from 13 to 15 pA, but showed a depolarized steady state in response to stimulations from 16 to 19 pA. Therefore, the stimulation threshold for the induction of the positive potential was 16 Pa at 50% g<sub>Na</sub>. Similarly, the thresholds under different g<sub>Na</sub> conditions were calculated: the threshold at 100% g<sub>Na</sub> and 150% g<sub>Na</sub> was 15 pA. The thresholds under conditions in which the other ionic conductance values were varied were also calculated in a similar manner. The threshold was 19 pA at 50% g<sub>Ca</sub>, 15 pA at 100% g<sub>Ca</sub>, and 14 pA at 150% g<sub>Ca</sub>. The threshold was 15 pA at 50% g<sub>Kv</sub>, 15 pA at 100% g<sub>Kv</sub>, and 16 pA at 150% g<sub>Kv</sub>. The threshold was 15 pA at 50% g<sub>A</sub>, 15 pA at 100% g<sub>A</sub>, and 16 pA at 150% g<sub>A</sub>. The threshold was 15 pA at 50% g<sub>Ka</sub>, 15 pA at 100% g<sub>Ka</sub>, and 17 pA at 150% g<sub>Ka</sub>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The present study performed numerical simulation of a mathematical model of a non-spiking A-type horizontal</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Time courses of the membrane potential of the model. The responses of the model to the stimulation of various amplitudes (from 13 to 19 pA) are superimposed. The stimulation was applied between 0.5 and 10 s, but not between 0 and 0.5 s</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x21.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The dependence of the dynamical states of the model on I<sub>app</sub> and g<sub>x</sub> (x = Na, Ca, Kv, A, and Ka). ○ indicates a hyperpolarized steady state, whereas ● indicates a depolarized steady state</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-7403250x22.png"/></fig><p>cell in the rabbit retina, and revealed the sensitivity of the stimulation threshold for the transition from a hyperpolarized steady state to a depolarized steady state to variations in ionic conductance values. A previous study investigated the effect of variations in ionic conductance values on the dynamics of the model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref2">2</xref>] . However, this study was limited to the analyses of the effect of the elimination of the sodium and calcium conductances and the effect of a decrease in the transient outward potassium conductance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref2">2</xref>] . Therefore, the study did not reveal the effect of variations in other ionic conductances such as the anomalous rectifier potassium conductance. Moreover, the previous study did not reveal the effect of an increase in the ionic conductances. To overcome these limitations, the present study not only decreased but also increased all the voltage-dependent ionic conductances, and revealed these effects on the model. Increases in g<sub>Na</sub> and g<sub>Ca</sub> induced a decrease in the stimulation threshold, whereas increases in g<sub>Kv</sub>, g<sub>A</sub>, and g<sub>Ka</sub> induced an increase in the stimulation threshold (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). In addition, the sensitivity of the stimulation threshold to variations in the ionic conductance values was in the order of g<sub>Ca</sub> &gt; g<sub>Ka</sub> &gt; g<sub>Na</sub> = g<sub>Kv</sub> = g<sub>A</sub>. In particular, the present study revealed that the influence of g<sub>Ka</sub> on the stimulation threshold was the largest among the three types of potassium conductances (i.e., g<sub>Kv</sub>, g<sub>A</sub>, and g<sub>Ka</sub>). This is an important finding, which has not been reported previously.</p><p>Analyses of mathematical models of other retinal cells based on the Hodgkin-Huxley model have been performed previously (e.g., in a retinal ganglion cell model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref5">5</xref>] and a retinal amacrine cell model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref6">6</xref>] ). However, in contrast to the nonspiking cell model of the present study, these studies focused on a repetitive spiking behavior observed in ganglion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref5">5</xref>] and amacrine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref6">6</xref>] cells.</p><p>Previous studies of other neuron models have reported the relationship between the stimulation threshold and ionic conductances (e.g., a vibrissa motoneuron model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref7">7</xref>] , an electrosensory neuron model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref8">8</xref>] , and a medial vestibular nucleus neuron (mVNn) model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref9">9</xref>] ). In particular, although the vibrissa motoneuron and electrosensory neuron models do not include calcium conductance, the mVNn model does. A previous study of the mVNn model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68983-ref9">9</xref>] illustrated that (1) calcium conductance influences the dynamical states of the mVNn model linearly, and (2) an increase in calcium conductance increases the stimulation threshold for the transition to a more excitable state (i.e., the transition from a hyperpolarized steady state to a repetitive spiking state). In contrast, the present study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) showed that (1) calcium conductance influenced the dynamical states of the nonspiking horizontal cell model nonlinearly, and (2) an increase in calcium conductance decreased the stimulation threshold for the transition to a more excitable state (i.e., the transition from a hyperpolarized steady state to a depolarized steady state).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The present study performed numerical simulation of a model of a nonspiking A-type horizontal cell in the rabbit retina to reveal the effect of variations in ionic conductances on the dynamics of the model. In particular, the present study revealed that (1) the calcium conductance affected the dynamical states of the model highly nonlinearly, and (2) the anomalous rectifier potassium conductance had the largest influence on the changes in the stimulation threshold among the three types of potassium conductances. Neither of these details has been reported previously. The present study contributes to a more detailed understanding of the characteristics of the ionic conductances of the model.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The author would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for their review of the English language.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Takaaki Shirahata, (2016) The Effect of Variations in Ionic Conductance Values on the Dynamics of a Mathematical Model of Non-Spiking A-Type Horizontal Cells in the Rabbit Retina. Applied Mathematics,07,1297-1302. doi: 10.4236/am.2016.712114</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68983-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blanco, R., Vaquero, C.F. and de la Villa, P. (1996) Action Potentials in Axonless Horizontal Cells Isolated from the Rabbit Retina. Neuroscience Letters, 203, 57-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(95)12263-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68983-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aoyama, T., Kamiyama, Y., Usui, S., Blanco, R., Vaquero, C.F. and de la Villa, P. (2000) Ionic Current Model of Rabbit Retinal Horizontal Cell. Neuroscience Research, 37, 141-151.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-0102(00)00111-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68983-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shirahata, T. (2008) Simulation of Rabbit A-Type Retinal Horizontal Cell That Generates Repetitive Action Potentials. Neuroscience Letters, 439, 116-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.04.087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68983-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ashrafuzzaman, M. and Tuszynski, J. (2012) Membrane Biophysics. Springer, Heidelberg, 26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68983-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fohlmeister, J.F., Cohen, E.D. and Newman, E.A. (2010) Mechanisms and Distribution of Ion Channels in Retinal Ganglion Cells: Using Temperature as an Independent Variable. Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 1357-1374.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00123.2009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68983-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cembrowski, M.S., Logan, S.M., Tian, M., Jia, L., Li, W., Kath, W.L., Riecke, H. and Singer, J.H. (2012) The Mechanisms of Repetitive Spike Generation in an Axonless Retinal Interneuron. Cell Reports, 1, 155-166.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2011.12.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68983-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Golomb, D. (2014) Mechanism and Function of Mixed-Mode Oscillations in Vibrissa Motoneurons. PLoS ONE, 9, e109205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109205</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68983-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shirahata, T. (2016) The Relationship of Sodium and Potassium Conductances with Dynamic States of a Mathematical Model of Electrosensory Pyramidal Neurons. Applied Mathematics, 7, 819-823.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/am.2016.79072</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68983-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shirahata, T. (2016) The Effect of Variations in Ionic Conductance Values on the Suppression of Repetitive Spiking in a Mathematical Model of Type-A Medial Vestibular Nucleus Neurons. Applied Mathematics, 7, 1134-1139.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/am.2016.710101</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>