<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1101904</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-68637</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Planting Time Effects of Top-Shoot Cutting on Yield and Grade for Rapid Seed Potato Multiplication
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Md.</surname><given-names>Abdullah Al Mamun</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdullah-Al</surname><given-names>Mahmud</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Md.</surname><given-names>Shawquat Ali Khan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Md.</surname><given-names>Altaf Hossain</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammad</surname><given-names>Zakaria</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Salna, Gazipur, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Agriculture Extension, Rangpur, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>mahmud.tcrc@gmail.com(AM)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>14</month>	<year>September</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   Top-shoot cuttings were evaluated as planting material with different planting time for rapid multiplication of potato. Plants produced from top-shoot cuttings planted on 25
   <sup style="line-height:1.5;">th</sup>
    November (T
   <sub style="line-height:1.5;">3</sub>
   ) produced higher mean tuber yield (32.95 tha
   <sup style="line-height:1.5;">﹣1</sup>
   ) than December planting. Total yield of potato increased 122.8% from early one source crop plants due to taking two times cutting and it was 89.7 % from late one source crop plants. Seed tuber yield increased 167.89% and 95.33% in early and late one source crop plants, respectively. The highest gross net return of Tk. 984,440 was found from whole tuber planted on 10
   <sup style="line-height:1.5;">th</sup>
    November with benefit cost ratio of 3.42. From top shoot cuttings, the highest net return of Tk. 739,600 was found in T
   <sub style="line-height:1.5;">3</sub>
    (25
   <sup style="line-height:1.5;">th</sup>
    November planting) with benefit cost ratio of 6.20. The crop grown from early planted top-shoot cuttings also produced higher percentage of A and B grade seed tubers than late planting. The results revealed that top shoot cuttings would be used in potato production for getting maximum economic return. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Top Shoot Cutting</kwd><kwd> Planting Date</kwd><kwd> Seed Potato Multiplication</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Potato is the important food crops in the world and it stands 3<sup>rd</sup> among the major food crops in Bangladesh. In spite of its starchy tubers, potato is usually utilized as vegetables in Bangladesh. In terms of area and production, potato ranks first among the vegetables in Bangladesh and the production is about 8.95 million tons from 0.462 million hectares [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref1">1</xref>] . Presently, the total seed potato requirement of the country is about 0.60 million tons to cover 0.46 million hectares of land [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref2">2</xref>] . Out of the total requirement, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation (BADC) supplied only about 27,000 m. tons (4.11%) in 2014-2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref2">2</xref>] that was used by the farmers as the replacement stock. So, there is a vast demand of quality seed tuber as planting material in the country [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref3">3</xref>] . The area and production of potatoes are increasing day by day due to its higher demand and profitability. Moreover, the yield of potato in Bangladesh is 19.37 tons per hectare, which is very low compared to other potato growing countries in the world. Several types of propagating materials like sprout cutting, top shoot cutting or stem parts with at least one bud, true potato seed, whole tuber and cut tuber are used for growing potatoes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref4">4</xref>] . The length of growing period of potato is relatively short (around 90 days) during winter (Mid-November to mid-February) in all over Bangladesh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref5">5</xref>] . Rashid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref6">6</xref>] reported that 25% to 50% of the total cost was involved in seed potato tuber purchase due to high price during sowing time. To minimize the seed cost, farmers of many potato growing areas are using cut tubers with closer spacing for commercial potato production. But seed cost remains more or less same since the farmers use closer spacing for cut tubers instead of using whole tuber at wider spacing. According to Hossain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref7">7</xref>] , top-shoot cuttings are routinely used in seed potato production for breeder seed multiplication. By using top-shoot cuttings farmers can reduce their production cost. There is a scope to use top-shoot cuttings from the plants grown early in medium to high land for cultivating potato in low land by reducing seed cost.</p><p>Appropriate and proper time of sowing is one of the basic requirements for obtaining maximum yield and high profit returns of potato [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref8">8</xref>] . Many experiments regarding sowing and transplanting time are being conducted in different parts of the world which revealed that the total yield of the crop is markedly influenced by different sowing and transplanting times [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref9">9</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref11">11</xref>] . Early planted top-shoot cuttings produced more tubers per plant with a greater mean tuber weight than from the late planting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref12">12</xref>] . But top-shoot cuttings are not being used by the farmers for potato production. It can be extended among the farmers providing them with appropriate production technology. Therefore the present study has been undertaken with the following objectives: 1) to assess the yield performance, seed grades, yield potential of top-shoot cuttings; and 2) to determine the economics of potato tuber production by using of top-shoot cuttings.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Location, Test Crop and Agro-Climatic Condition</title><p>Top-shoot cuttings were evaluated as planting material with different planting time for rapid multiplication of potato at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU) during winter, 2011-2012. The location is situated at about 24˚23' north latitude, 90˚08' east longitude and an altitude of 8.4 m above sea level and adjacent to capital Dhaka city. Potato variety Diamant (BARI Potato-7) was used as test crop. During the growing period maximum and minimum air temperature, relative humidity (%), precipitation and evaporation data were recorded throughout the crop period (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The air temperature was decreasing in trend from November to January and thereafter increased.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Agro-climatic data in average of the month during the growing period, 2011-2012</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Month</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Air temperature (˚C)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Humidity (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Rainfall (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Evaporation (mm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ave.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >November</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >December</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >January</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >February</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >March</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Design and Treatment</title><p>The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The treatments were: T<sub>1</sub> = Whole tuber planting at 1<sup>st</sup> November (1<sup>st</sup> Control), T<sub>2</sub> = Whole tuber planting at 1<sup>st</sup> November for cutting; T<sub>3</sub> = 1<sup>st</sup> cutting from T<sub>2</sub> planted on 25<sup>th</sup> November; T<sub>4</sub> = 2<sup>nd</sup> cutting from T<sub>2</sub> on 5<sup>th</sup> December; T<sub>5</sub> = Whole tuber planting on 10<sup>th</sup> November (2<sup>nd</sup> control); T<sub>6</sub> = Whole tuber planting on 10<sup>th</sup> November for cutting; T<sub>7</sub> = 1<sup>st</sup> cutting from T<sub>6</sub> on 5<sup>th</sup> December and T<sub>8</sub> = 2<sup>nd</sup> cutting from T<sub>6</sub> on 15<sup>th</sup> December.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Seed Preparation, Planting of Tubers and Stem Cutting</title><p>The seed tubers were kept in a well-ventilated room and allowed to sprouting under light at night for obtaining healthy green sprouts prior to planting. In this process, 8 - 10 days were elapsed for sprouting. The sprouted tubers were planted at 1<sup>st</sup> November (T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>2</sub>) and 10<sup>th</sup> November (T<sub>5</sub> and T<sub>6</sub>). T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>5</sub> were treated as control for producing normal crop. Treatments T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> were used as source of top shoot cuttings. First top-shoot cuttings with at least two nodes were taken from T<sub>2</sub> at 25 days after planting (DAP) which were used as planting material for T<sub>3</sub>. Second cuttings were taken from (T<sub>2</sub>) at 10 days after first cutting which were used as planting material for T<sub>4</sub>. Cuttings were taken by slant cut with a sharp blade and the cut end immerged into water immediately. Then the shoot cuttings were planted in the main plot after treating them with rooting hormone (Napthalene Acetic Acid-16 ppm). Before planting the shoot cuttings in the experimental plots, the plots were irrigated properly so that the cut portion came to the soil and moisture contact. Similarly the top-shoot cuttings were taken from T<sub>6</sub> which were used as planting materials for T<sub>7</sub> and T<sub>8</sub> at 5<sup>th</sup> December and 15<sup>th</sup> December, respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Fertilizer Application</title><p>Full doses of cow dung (10 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>), triple super phosphate (220 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>), muriate of potatsh (270 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>), gypsum (120 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>), boric acid (6 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) and half dose of urea (175 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) were applied at final land preparation. The rest half of urea (175 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) was top dressed at 30 DAP followed by earthing up and light irrigation. Ridge method was used for whole tuber planting (T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>2</sub>, T<sub>5</sub> and T<sub>6</sub>) treatments.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Intercultural Operation</title><p>Healthy top shoot cuttings were planted in well watered flat bed. After establishment of the shoot cuttings, ridge was made by earthing up of sides. Intercultural operations such as weeding and earthing up were done manually. Earthing up was done two times, first earthing up was done at 30 DAP when the plant attained a height of about 15 - 20 cm from the base, second time was done at 20 days after the first earthing up. Before the first earthing up, urea was applied. Irrigation was applied five times. The first one was applied at two weeks after planting, the second one was just after earthing up (30 DAP), the third one was at 45 DAP, the 4<sup>th</sup> one on 60 DAP, and the last one was at 75 DAP. During land preparation, Furadan 5G was applied 10 kg/ha as basal to control soil borne insects and Malathion (0.2%) sprayed in two installments at 45 and 60 DAP control foliar insects. Dithane-M 45 (0.2%) and Secure (0.1%) sprayed alternately five times at 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 DAP to prevent the late blight disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref13">13</xref>] . Haulm pulling was done at 80 DAP in all treatments. Hardening and setting up of skins of tubers were allowed for 10 days under the soil and there after the crop was harvested at 90 DAP.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Data Collection</title><sec id="s2_6_1"><title>2.6.1. Yield of Tubers</title><p>The gross yield of tubers per plot was recorded by taking weight of the harvested tubers from all plants of a unit plot and was converted into yield in tons per hectare by using following formula:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68637-formula707"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68637x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_6_2"><title>2.6.2. Tuber Grade by Number (%)</title><p>All the tubers from the randomly selected five plants were graded into four groups by number (under size ≤ 28 mm, Grade A = 28 - 40 mm, Grade B = 41 - 55 mm and Over size ≥ 55 mm) and expressed in percentage. By using the following formula percentage of each grade was calculated.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68637-formula708"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68637x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_6_3"><title>2.6.3. Tuber Grade by Weight (%)</title><p>All the tubers from the randomly selected five plants were graded into four groups by weight (under size ≤ 28 mm, Grade-A = 28 - 40 mm, Grade-B = 41 - 55 mm and over size ≥ 55 mm) and expressed in percentage. By using the following formula percentage of each grade was calculated.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68637-formula709"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68637x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Data Analysis</title><p>Recorded data on tuber yield, grades of tuber by weight and by number were analyzed statistically using the software MSTATC (Developed by the Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA). Significance between treatments were tested by using Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at p &lt; 0.05 level. Benefit cost ratio (BCR) was calculated according to Khan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref14">14</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Yield</title><p>Tuber yield per hectare significantly influenced by planting time (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) and ranged from 18.89 to 42.56 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>. Yield decreased in stem cuttings with delayed planting. The highest tuber yield (42.56 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) was obtained from whole tuber planted at 10<sup>th</sup> November (T<sub>5</sub>) which was statistically similar with planted at 1<sup>st</sup> November (T<sub>1</sub>) yielded 41.84 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>. In case of top-shoot cutting, early planted cuttings (25th November) produced maximum tuber yield of 32.95 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> followed by 5th December planting (25.65 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>). The lowest yield (18.89 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) was found in late planted (15th December) cuttings. Tuber yield of potato increased 122.8% (41.84 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> to 93.23 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) from early one source crop due to taking two times cuttings, while it was 89.7% (from 42.56 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> to 80.75 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) from late one source crop. Tuber yield reduced in the treatments T<sub>4</sub>, T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> compared to its corresponding control (T<sub>1</sub>).</p><p>The plants used for cuttings produced from whole tuber planted at 1st November (T<sub>2</sub>) showed 17.2 % of yield reduction compared to control (T<sub>1</sub>) might be due to two times top shoot cuttings that reduced photosynthetic area and resulted in lower yield. Photosynthesis is positively related with the leaf area and foliage coverage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref15">15</xref>] . Many authors previously reported similar results on seed tuber multiplication through top shoot cuttings ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref17">17</xref>] ).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effects of planting time on tuber yield and yield increase or decrease as compare to respective control</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yield (t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cumulative yield (t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yield increase (%) with destructive haulm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yield decrease as compare to respective control (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yield decrease (−)/increase (+) in 2nd planting as compare to 1st planting (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.84 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.63 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.95 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.65 e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.56 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>6</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.52 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.34 e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−26.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>8</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.89 f</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−26.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Level of significance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>** </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means bearing same letter in a column do not differ significantly at 1% level of probability.</p><p>Again, 21.2% and 38.7% yield reduction was observed in top shoot cuttings treatments T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>4</sub>, respectively. Top-shoot cutting plants needed more time for its establishment and plants got less time to tuber initiation and development resulting lower yield. Similar trend was observed in the treatments T<sub>5</sub>, T<sub>6</sub>, T<sub>7</sub> and T<sub>8</sub>. The yield reduction was higher in the treatments T<sub>7</sub> and T<sub>8</sub> (42.4% and 55.6% respectively) due to late planting of top- shoot cuttings which took more time to establish and simultaneously faced higher temperature which was not suitable for tuber initiation and development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref18">18</xref>] . But increased yield was found in T<sub>5</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> (1.7% and 8.3%, respectively) compared to respective T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>2</sub>. It might be due to getting more favorable environment as a result of proper time planting in Bangladesh situation. The crop produced from top-shoot cuttings planted at 5th and 15th December (T<sub>7</sub> and T<sub>8</sub> respectively) showed more yield reduction (26.1% and 26.4% respectively) compared to the cuttings planted on 25th November (T<sub>3</sub>) and 5th December (T<sub>4</sub>) due to prevailing higher temperature. Early planted tubers favors the better vegetative growth of plants than late planted tubers which ultimately favors the healthier production of top shoots and resulted better establishment of the cuttings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref17">17</xref>] . This practice caused production of vigorous plants with better plant height having more number of leaves which ultimately favors in more photosynthesis; a necessary component for obtaining higher yield [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref19">19</xref>] . Previous studies reported that the yield decreases with delayed planting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref9">9</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref11">11</xref>] . Yield reductions in delayed planting regardless of the precocity and the type of planting materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref20">20</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref22">22</xref>] . These results are in conformity with the findings of Akhter et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>Seed tuber yield increased 167.89% (30.96 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> to 82.94 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>) from early one source crop due to taking two times cuttings, while it was 95.33% (from 37.88 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> to73.99 t∙ha<sup>−1</sup> cumulative yield) from late one source crop (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Number of cumulative seed tuber increased from 918519 to 1560741with 69.91% increased from early one source crop due to taking two times cutting, while it was 63.19% (from 923,704 to 1,507,408) from late one source crop.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Tuber Grade (% by Number and by Weight)</title><p>Planting time of top shoot cutting of potato had significant effects on tuber grade by number (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Maximum percentage (53.3%) of A grade (28 - 40 mm) seed by number was recorded from T<sub>4</sub> followed by T<sub>7</sub> (53.10%) and T<sub>2</sub> (52.80%) which were statistically similar. The lowest percentage (45.6%) of A-grade seed was recorded from T<sub>3</sub>. Highest percentage (36.50%) of B-grade (41 - 55 mm) seed was obtained from T<sub>6</sub> followed by T<sub>5</sub> (33.60%) and T<sub>7</sub> (33.30%). The lowest percentage (24.0) of B-grade seed was recorded in T<sub>2</sub>.</p><p>Planting time of top shoot cuttings of potato on tuber grade by weight was significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Maximum percentage (70.20%) of A-grade seed (28 - 40 mm) was found in T<sub>8</sub> and minimum percentage (25.50%) of A-grade seed was found in T<sub>3</sub>. The highest percentage (65.90%) of B-grade seed (41-55mm) was found in T<sub>6</sub> which was followed by T<sub>4</sub> (63.70), T<sub>7</sub> (61.0%) and T<sub>3</sub> (60.30%). The lowest percentage (21.6) of B-grade seed was found in T<sub>8</sub>. The highest percentage (14.20%) of non-seed tuber (&lt;28 mm and &gt;55 mm) was found in T<sub>3</sub> followed by T<sub>5</sub> (11.00%) and the lowest percentage (7.10%) fromT<sub>2</sub>.The highest percentage (26.00%) of non-seed (&lt;28 mm + &gt;55 mm) was found from T<sub>1</sub> followed by T<sub>2</sub> (23.20%) and T<sub>3</sub> (22.00%) which were statis-</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Seed yield potential of potato with non-destructive haulm due to cuttings at different time</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Planting time</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Seed yield (t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cumulative seed yield (t∙ha<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Seed yield increase (%) with destructive haulm</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Seed tuber (no/ha)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Number increase (%) with destructive haulm</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Actual tuber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cumulative tuber</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >918,519</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >918,519</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >167.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >834,815</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,560,741</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >355,556</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >370,370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >923,704</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >923,704</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>6</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >852,593</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,507,408</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >337,778</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>8</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >317,037</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>tically similar and the lowest percentage (13.60%) of non-seed was found in T<sub>7</sub> followed by T<sub>4</sub> (14.7%) and T<sub>6</sub> (16.8%). Potato produced from stem cutting revealed that delayed planting reduced total tuber number and potato grade. These results are in conformity with the findings of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref25">25</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Economic Analysis</title><p>Variations in benefit cost ratio (BCR) were observed among the treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). In case of top shoot cuttings, high labor involvement required compared to whole tuber planting. In seed production of potato from whole tuber planting, total cost was the highest (Tk. 288,000) in treatments T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>2</sub>, T<sub>5</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> and was the lowest (Tk. 119,367) in treatments T<sub>3</sub>, T<sub>4</sub>, T<sub>7</sub> and T<sub>8</sub>. The highest gross return of Tk. 984,440 was found in T<sub>5</sub> and the lowest from T<sub>8</sub> (TK. 443,190).</p><p>Considering seed production from top shoot cuttings, total cost was the minimum in the treatments T<sub>3,</sub> T<sub>4</sub>, T<sub>7</sub> and T<sub>8</sub> and it was Tk. 119,367. The highest gross return of Tk. 739,600 was found in T<sub>3</sub> followed by T<sub>4</sub> (Tk. 597,560). The lowest net return of Tk. 443,190 was found in T<sub>8</sub>. The maximum benefit cost ratio (BCR) of 6.20 also recorded from T<sub>3</sub> followed by T<sub>4</sub>. The overall BCR was obtained higher in top shoot cuttings than whole</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Effects of planting time on tuber grade by number and weight</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >% Grade by number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >% Grade by weight</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade A (28 - 40 mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade B (41 - 55 mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%Non-seed (&lt;28 mm + &gt;55 mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade A (28 - 40 mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grade B (41 - 55 mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%Non-seed (&lt;28mm + &gt;55mm)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>6</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>8</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Level of significance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>**</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>**</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>**</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>**</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>**</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>**</sup><sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.36</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Partial budget analysis of potato for different treatment combinations of top shoot cutting and control</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total material cost (Tk.)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total non-material cost (Tk.)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total variable cost (Tk.)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Gross return (Tk./ha)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total gross return (Tk./ha)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Net return (Tk.)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >BCR</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-seed</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >218,600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69,400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >774,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84,160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >858,160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >570,159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >218,600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69,400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >796,500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22,160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >818,660</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >530,659</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45,034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74,333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119,367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >700,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39,600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >739,600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >620,233</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45,034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74,333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119,367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >577,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20,560</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >597,560</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >478,193</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >218,600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69,400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >947,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37,440</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >984,440</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >696,439</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>6</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >218,600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69,400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >872,250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21,040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >893,290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >605,289</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>7</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45,034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74,333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119,367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >547,750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19,440</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >567,190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >447,823</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>8</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45,034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74,333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119,367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429,750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,440</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >443,190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >323,823</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>1 USD = 78.30 Tk.</p><p>tubers being no required seed cost. Our study revealed that the BCR for whole tuber planting was the highest at mid-November planting and for the top shoots cutting; BCR was highest at early planting of top shoot cutting. Many authors previously reported similar results on seed tuber multiplication [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref26">26</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68637-ref28">28</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Early planted top shoot cutting (25th November planting) yielded maximum than late planting (December). The crop grown from early planted top-shoot cuttings produced higher percentage of A- (28 - 40 mm) and B-grade (41 - 55 mm) seed tubers than late planting. For getting maximum benefit top shoot cuttings would be used in potato production rather than the plants produced from whole tubers.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Appreciation is extended to Director General of Department of Agriculture Extension, Khamarbari, Dhaka for granting fellowship and to the Department of Horticulture of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University for providing facilities of this study.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Md. Abdullah Al Mamun,Abdullah-Al Mahmud,Md. Shawquat Ali Khan,Md. Altaf Hossain,Mohammad Zakaria, (2015) Planting Time Effects of Top-Shoot Cutting on Yield and Grade for Rapid Seed Potato Multiplication. Open Access Library Journal,02,1-8. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1101904</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68637-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Horetex Newsletter (2011) The Horticulture Export Development Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Volume 11, Number 3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Annual Report (2015) Annual Report 2014-15. Monitoring Division, Bangladesh Agriculture Development Corporation (BADC), Krishi Bhaban, 49-51, Dilkhusha C/A, Dhaka.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sarath, G.I., Kadian, M.S., Hossain, M., Hossain, A.E., Jayasinghe, U. and Mahmud, A.A. (2001) Toward Alleviating Poverty of Rural Potato Farmers by Strengthening the Potato Seed System in Bangladesh: A Rapid Rural Appraisal. Scientist and Farmer. Partners in Research for the 21st Century. Program Report 1999-2000, 259-264.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hossain, M.J., Nahar, M.S. and Ahmed, A.S.U. (1999) Sprout and Top Shoot Cutting for Rapid Multiplication of Potato in Bangladesh. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 132, 437-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859699006565</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rashid, M.M., Khan, A.L. and Ali, M.S. (1986) Seed Potato Production. 1st Edition, Potato Research Centre. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rashid, M.M. (1999) Vegetable Science [in Bengali: Sobji Bigyan]. 2nd Edition, Rashid Publishing House, Dhaka, 138-139.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hossain, M.J. (1993) Tuber from Leaf-Bud and Apical-Bud Cutting: Methods for Rapid Clonal Propagation of Potato in Bangladesh. Field Crops Research, 35, 147-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90147-f</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kar</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2003</year>)<article-title>Tuber Yield of Potato as Influenced by Planting Dates and Mulches</article-title><source> Journal of Agrometeorology</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 60</fpage>-<lpage>67</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Braun, E.E. (1997) Planting Dates and Crop of Potatoes in the Northern and Western Kazakhstan, West Kazakhstan. CSTI, Uralsk, 39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, A.A., Jilani, M.S., Khan, M.Q. and Zubair, M. (2011) Effect of Seasonal Variation on Tuber Bulking Rate of Potato. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 21, 31-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dehdar, B., Asadi, A., Jahani, Y. and Ghasemi, K. (2012) The Effect of Planting and Harvesting Dates on Yield and Vegetative Growth of Two Potato Cultivars in Ardabil Region. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 3, 675-678.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hossain</surname><given-names> M.J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1997</year>)<article-title>Enhanced Seed Multiplication in Potato through Cut Seed and Stem Cutting</article-title><source> Journal of Indian Potato Association</source><volume> 24</volume>,<fpage> 101</fpage>-<lpage>103</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dey, T.K., Prodhan, Z.H. and Hossain, M.S. (2007) Potato Late Blight and Its Integrated Management (Booklet in Bengali). Breeders Seed Production Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Debiganj, Panchagarh.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, M.S.A., Hossain, M.A., Mahmud, A.A., Howlader, M.I.A. and Rahman, M.A. (2008) Integrated Weed Management in Potato at Munshigonj. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 33, 647-654.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mahmud, A.A. (2012) Improvement of Drought Tolerant Potato Variety. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Horticulture, Banngabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hossain, M.J. (1993) Tuber from Leaf-Bud and Apical Bud Cutting: Methods for Rapid Clonal Propagation of Potato in Bangladesh. Field Crops Research, 35, 147-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90147-F</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yasmin, M.F. (2008) Effect of Planting Time and Plant Density of Top Shoot Cuttings in Potato Production. Master’s Thesis, Department of Horticulture, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Salna.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Burton, W.G. (1996) Yield and Content Dry Matter: 1—The Underlying Physiological Processes. In: Burton, W.G., Ed., The Potato, Longman Scientific &amp; Technical, Essex, 84-155.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Farooque, K. (2005) Use of True Potato Seed for Better Yields. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Agronomy, University of Arid Agriculture, Rawalpindi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassanpanah, D., Hosienzadeh, A.A. and Allahyari, N. (2009) Evaluation of Planting Date Effects on Yield and Yield Components of Savalan and Agria Cultivars in Ardabil Region. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 7, 525-528.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taheri, S. and Shamabadi, Z.A. (2013) Effect of Planting Date and Plant Density on Potato Yield, Approach Energy Efficiency. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 5, 747-754.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kawakami, J., Iwama, K. and Jitsuyama, Y. (2005) Effects of Planting Date on the Growth and Yield of Two Potato Cultivars Grown from Microtubers and Conventional Seed Tubers. Plant Production Science, 8, 74-78.http://dx.doi.org/10.1626/pps.8.74</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akhter, S., Islam, M.M., Azad, M.A.K., Hakim, M.A., Alam, M.S. and Rahman, M.W. (2013) Effects of Planting Time and Variety on the Yield and Processing Quality of Potato. Food, Agriculture and Environment, 11, 461-465.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Basappa, S., Krishnappa, K.S., Reddy, N.S. and Gowda, M.C. (2000) Effects of Planting Dates and Genotypes on Growth and Yield of Potato Raised from TPS Transplants. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 34, 55-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">RahmanJamro, M.M., Tunio, S.D. and Chachar, Q.D. (2015) Effect of Planting Dates on Growth and Yield of True Potato Seed (TPS) in Nursery Raising Approach. Journal of Basic &amp; Applied Sciences, 11, 318-322.http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1927-5129.2015.11.47</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haque, M.E., Hossain, M.S., Islam, M.K., Waliullah, M.H. and Dey, T.K. (2013) Effect of Planting Time and Fungicidal Spray in Controlling Late Blight of Potato Variety Raja. Journal of Agroforestry and Environment, 7, 123-126.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haque, M.A., MonayemMiah, M.A., Hossain, S. and Rahman, M.M. (2012) Profitability of BARI Released Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Varieties in Some Selected Locations of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 37, 149-158.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68637-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moniruzzaman</surname><given-names> Hoq</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> M.S.</surname><given-names> Islam</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> M.K.</surname><given-names> Jasmin</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> J. and Khanam</surname><given-names> M.M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>Agro-Economic Performance of Seed Potato Production under Contract Farming in Bangladesh</article-title><source> Eco-Friendly Agriculture Journal</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 30</fpage>-<lpage>36</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>