<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1101757</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-68527</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Varietal Characterisation and Taxonomic Evaluation of Sweet Potato (&lt;i&gt;Ipomoea batatas&lt;/i&gt;) Using Macro- and Micromorphological Evidence
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Celestine</surname><given-names>U. Aguoru</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Patience</surname><given-names>Uhia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Joseph</surname><given-names>O. Olasan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Biological Sciences, University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>celeaguoru@yahoo.com(CUA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>08</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>2</month>	<year>August</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   Taxonomic audit was carried out on three varieties of sweet potato (
   Ipomoea batata
   ) in north central part of Nigeria. Ten (10) tubers of the representative samples of three varieties of sweet potato (Purple, Yellow and White varieties) were collected from different locations within the north central part of Nigeria and planted in the research farm of the University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria. At full maturity, they were characterized using gross macro- and micromorphological features. Mean values of all quantitative parameters were computed for each variety. Qualitative and quantitative data generated were analysed by using SPSS software 20.0 version. Box plots and charts were constructed to reveal level of variations at a glance. Dendrogram was generated using furthest neighbor method to reveal the phylogenetic relationships among the varieties. Statistical test of significance was performed on major variable characters. From the results, the three varieties varied significantly in their epidermal characters such as stomatal types, stomatal indices and number of epidermal cells. Stomata types were tetracytic, anisocytic, and paracytic in all but the Purple variety had an additional stomatal type (anomocytic). Macroscopically, variation was observed with respect to some qualitative characters (leaf apices, leaf shape, leaf margins, leaf bases, leaf colour, stem colour and root colour) and quantitative characters (leaf sizes, petiole length, stem diameter, root sizes and plant height) at significant levels (p &lt; 0.05). As a result, dendrogram classified the three varieties where the yellow and purple types were widely divergent as two separate species under the Genus 
   Ipomoea
   . The white type could be seen as a variety of the yellow type based on their close relationship. The synergistic information obtained from both morphological and anatomical sources of evidence in this report has yielded a reliable result that may call for appropriate nomenclatural assignments. Hence, the authors suggest the following nomenclatures: 
   Ipomea batatas 
   var 
   makurdi
    (Yellow variety); 
   Ipomoea batatas 
   var 
   lafia 
   (White variety) and 
   Ipomoea aguoru
    (Purple variety). 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Ipomoea batata&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Varieties</kwd><kwd> Variation</kwd><kwd> Characters</kwd><kwd> Phylogeny</kwd><kwd> Nomenclature</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Sweet potato (ipomoea batatas) is a dicotyledonous plant that belongs to the family of convolvulaceae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref1">1</xref>] . It is popularly known for its starchy and edible tubers as root vegetable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref2">2</xref>] . According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref3">3</xref>] , the young leaves and shoots are sometimes eaten as greens. The plants are herbaceous perennial plants bearing alternate heart-shaped or palmately lobed leaves and medium sized sympetalous flowers with a smooth skin whose colours range among yellow, orange, red, brown, and purple. Sweet potato varieties with white or pale yellow flesh are less sweet and moist than those with red, pink orange flesh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref4">4</xref>] . Sweet potato is a stable food crop that is widely cultivated in most parts of Africa, most especially in Nigeria though it’s believed to have originated from Central America or South America. In Nigerian markets, three varieties are in popular demands: the purple, yellow and white potato. Abundant evidence shows that sweet potatoes are spread widely through the migration roots of people in the new world tropics before the discovery of America [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) is the world’s eleventh most important food crop after wheat, rice, maize, potato, barley and cassava and has different varieties within the series batatas. There are thirteen wild species related to sweet potatoes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref8">8</xref>] . It is cooked or used to make cakes, chapattis, mandazia, bread, buns and cookies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref9">9</xref>] . The young leafy shoots which are eaten as a green vegetable in some countries has high protein of about 20% dry weight and are good source of b-carotene, thyamine (Vitamin B1), riboflavin (B2), folic acid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref10">10</xref>] . The primary centre of diversity of sweet potatoes is located in North Western and South America (Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru) and parts of Central America (such as Guatemala) where a great diversity of native sweet potatoes, weeds and wild ipomoea exists. Secondary centres of sweet potato diversity outside of the Americas are in China, South East Asia, New Guinea and East Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref12">12</xref>] . Though some varieties are popularly known as the Irish potato by indicating their non nativeness, the crop is widely cultivated and has formed a staple food in all parts of Nigeria.</p><p>Within the series batatas there are 13 wild species that are considered to be related to sweet potatoes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref8">8</xref>] . According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref13">13</xref>] , there are about six thousand five hundred (6500) sweet potatoes’ varieties, including wild accessions, farmer varieties and breeding lines. The skin colours of sweet potatoes come in various shades yellow-orange skins, creamy white, tan, reddish purple and red. Ipomoea batatas is not known in the wild and plants found growing in the wild are remnants from abandoned cultivated fields or coming from sweet potato seeds, which continue growing by vegetative propagation. Several wild ipomoea species having some morphological resemblance to Ipomoea batatas have been considered as potential wild ancestors of the sweet potato [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Sweet potato has so many varieties, including wild accessions, farmers’ varieties and breeding lines. This study is to reveal the anatomical (Leaf epidermal) and morphological similarities and differences of three varieties of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). The aim is to establish the degree of relatedness or divergence among three varieties of sweet potato and establish the phylogenetic relationship that exists amongst them.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Ten (10) tubers of the representative samples of three varieties of sweet potato (Purple, Yellow and White varieties) were collected from different locations (Mararaba, Masaka, Keffi, Lafia, Makurdi, Gboko, Jos and Suleja) within the north central part of Nigeria and planted in the research farm of the University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria. At full maturity, they were characterized using macroscopic and microscopic taxonomic sources of evidence.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Microanatomical Evidence</title><p>Epidermal peels of the leaves were prepared for microscopic studies following standard protocols [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref15">15</xref>] . 20 slides consisting of 10 abaxial and 10 adaxial surfaces were prepared from the leaf of each variety. The slides were appropriately labelled and examined under low and high power objective lenses. Ten (10) fields view were observed per slide. All epidermal structures were comparatively studied and photomicrographs of the anatomical features were taken using installed digital camera. The stomata index was calculated based on the formula derived by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref16">16</xref>] . The mean was derived by adding up the total number of stomata index and dividing it by 10.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68527-formula361"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68527x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>SI = Stomata index;</p><p>S = Number of stomata per unit area;</p><p>E = Number of epidermal cells in the same unit area.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Macromorphological Evidence</title><p>The macromorphological characters which include leaf length, leaf breath, petiole length, plant height, root length and stem diameter were assessed using a meter rule while the leaf weight was assessed by using a digital weighing machine with tarring function. The leaf type, leaf shape, leaf apex, leaf margin, leaf venation, leaf arrangement, leaf base, leaf colour, stem colour and root colour (storage and fibrous roots) were physically examined.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Operations</title><p>Mean values of all quantitative parameters were computed for each variety. Qualitative and quantitative data generated were analysed using SPSS software 20.0 version. Box plots and charts were constructed to reveal level of variations at a glance. Dendrogram was generated using complete linkage and furthest neighbor methods to reveal the phylogenetic relationships among the varieties. Statistical test of significance was performed on the two sources of taxonomic evidence used.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>The mean values of stomata, epidermal cells and stomata indices of each variety (abaxial and adaxial surfaces combined) are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The lowest number of stomata was recorded in the Purple variety (21.25) but possessed the highest number of epidermal cells (54.4). Consequently, the Purple variety had the lowest stomatal index (28.09%) which varied widely from the indices obtained in the Yellow and White varieties (40.06% and 41.5%) as revealed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Therefore, the purple type differed from others in terms of stomatal indices and number of epidermal cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). It is also worth noting to discover that only the Purple variety has hexagonal shaped epidermal cells apart from the polygonal and irregular shapes common to all the varieties. Stomata types were tetracytic, anisocytic, and paracytic in the three varieties but the Purple Variety had an additional stomatal type (anomocytic).</p><p>Macroscopically, wide variation was observed with respect to some qualitative characters (leaf apices, leaf shape, leaf margins, leaf bases, leaf colour, stem colour, root colour) and quantitative characters (leaf sizes, petiole length, stem diameter, root sizes and plant height) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Statistical significant differences were recorded in the two sources of taxonomic evidence used in this study (p &lt; 0.05) as given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. As a result, dendrogram has clearly classified the three varieties (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Therefore, the Purple (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)) and</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Micromorphological characterization of the three varieties of Ipomoea batatas</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean number of stomata</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean epidermal cells</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Epidermal cells shape</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stomata type(s)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stomata indices (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Purple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >54.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Irregular Polygonal Hexagonal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anomocytic Tetracytic Anisocytic Paracytic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >34.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Irregular Polygonal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tetracytic Anisocytic Paracytic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >44.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Irregular</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tetracytic Anisocytic Paracytic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Stomatal indices of the three varieties (p = 0.014)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68527x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Epidermal partitioning of the three varieties of Ipomoea batatas</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68527x8.png"/></fig><p>Yellow (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)) varieties could be described as two separate species under the Genus Ipomoea while the White type (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)) could be seen as a variety of the Yellow type based on their close relationship. This is substantiated in their root colour differences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)). Similar approach of classification was successfully adopted by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref17">17</xref>] in the determination of phylogenetic relationship in eggplant molecular studies in north central Nigeria. The present study generally agrees with the views of most plant taxonomists that microanatomical features in plants are of huge taxonomic values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref18">18</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>Accoding to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref11">11</xref>] , a common feature of Ipomoea batatas is the formation of complexes through infraspecific</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Macromorphological characterization of the three varieties of Ipomoea batatas</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Purple variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >White variety</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simple</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf shape</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cordate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Deltoid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cordate</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf apex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acuminate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cuspidate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acute</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf margin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Repand/serrate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sinuate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Entire</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf venation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palmately netted</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palmately netted</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palmately netted</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf arrangement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alternate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alternate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alternate</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf base</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cordate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hastate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cordate</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Purple/green</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Green</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Green</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stem colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Purple/red</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Green</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Green</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Root colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Purple/green</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow/green</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >White/green</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf length (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf breadth (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaf weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Petiole length (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plant height (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stem diameter (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Root length (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Test of Significance of demarcating characters</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >t</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sig. (2-tailed)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean difference</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >95% Confidence interval of the difference (Lower)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >95% Confidence interval of the difference (Upper)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stomatal indices</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.487</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.73000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.1090</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.3510</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epidermal cells</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.746</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.50000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.7819</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.2181</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Petiole sizes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.082</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.055</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.56667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.6242</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.7575</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Root sizes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.411</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.90000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7666</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0334</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>hybridization. Hence, polyploidy as a combination of new chromosome may lead to sympatric speciation where new species of distinct character may likely evolve. The same type of hybrid complexes was reported in eggplant (Solanaceae) which continuously gives rise to new species because of their interfertile nature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref17">17</xref>] . Mechanism of unreduced pollen formation was proposed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref21">21</xref>] as responsible for the polyploidization of sweetpotato. Sweet potato, as a genetically diverse economic crop, offers huge genetic resources that should be explored, maintained, utilized and conserved [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref13">13</xref>] . In the view of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68527-ref3">3</xref>] , the crop could be described as an untapped food resource. Therefore as new species emerge, a continuous taxonomic review is pertinent to ensure accurately named germplasm for efficient communication in all aspects of the biology of the crop.</p><p>The synergistic information obtained from both morphological and anatomical sources of evidence in this report has yielded reliable results that may call for appropriate nomenclatural assignments. Hence, the authors suggest the following nomenclatures: Ipomea batatas var makurdi (Yellow variety); Ipomoea batatas var lafia (White variety) and Ipomoea aguoru (Purple variety). The first two are named based on location of collection while the third is named based on the author’s name. In conclusion, it can be inferred that macro- and morphological and microanatomical features are relevant taxonomic tools in separating sweet potato varieties.</p><p>Dendrogram using Complee Linkage</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Dendrogram of the three varieties</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68527x9.png"/></fig><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Purple variety; (b) Yellow variety; (c) White variety; (d) (L-R) root of white, purple and yellow varieties.</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68527x11.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_2"><label>(c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68527x10.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_3"><label> (d)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68527x13.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_4"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68527x12.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>Therefore, variability in sweet potato may be explored by plant breeders for crop improvement. This outcome thus calls for more taxonomic audit of the Ipomoea batatas complexes through cytogenetic and molecular systematic studies.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Celestine U. Aguoru,Patience Uhia,Joseph O. Olasan, (2015) Varietal Characterisation and Taxonomic Evaluation of Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas) Using Macro- and Micromorphological Evidence. Open Access Library Journal,02,1-7. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1101757</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68527-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dutta, A.C. (2007) Botany for Degree Students. Revised 6th Edition, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 570 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Purseglove, J.W. (1968) Tropical Crops: Dicotyledons, Longman Scientific and Technical. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Woolfe, J.A. (1992) Sweet Potato: And Untapped Food Resource. Cambridge University Press and the International Potato Center (CIP), Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gad, L. and George, T. (2009) The Sweet Potato. 391-425.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nishiyama</surname><given-names> I. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1971</year>)<article-title>Evolution and Domestication of the Sweet Potato</article-title><source> The Botanical Magazine (Tokyo)</source><volume> 84</volume>,<fpage> 377</fpage>-<lpage>387</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O’Brien, P.J. (1972) The Sweet Potato: Its Origin and Dispersal. American Anthropologist, 74, 343-365.http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.1972.74.3.02a00070</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Austin, D.F. (1979) An Infrageneric Classification for Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae). Taxon, 28, 359-361.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1219747</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Austin, D.F. and Huáman, Z. (1996) A Synopsis of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) in the Americas. Taxon, 45, 3-38.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1222581</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rhoda, A.N. (1994) Nutrition Kenyan Sweet Potato Recipes. Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, 1-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Villareal, D., Apavian, C., Kushner, R. and Klein, S. (2005) Obesity in Older Adults: Technical Review and Position Statement of the American Society for Nutrition and NAASO. The Obesity Society. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 82, 923-934.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Austin, D.F. (1988) The Taxonomy, Evolution and Genetic Diversity of Sweet Potatoes and Related Wild Species. In: Gregory, P., Ed., Exploration, Maintenance and Utilization of Sweet Potato Genetic Resources, Report of the 1st Sweet Potato Planning Conference 1987, International Potato Center, Lima, 27-59.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CIP (International Potato Centre) (1987) Exploration Maintenance and Utilization of Sweet Potato Genetic Resources. Report of the 1st Sweet Potato Planning Conference, Lima, 369.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CIP (1996) Sweet Potato Facts. International Potato Center, Lima.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, D.P., Ghislain, M., Huaman, Z. and Golmirzaie, A. (1996) RAPD Analyses of Genetic Diversity in Sweet Potato Cultivars from South America and Papua New Guinea. International Plant Genome Conference, San Diego, 14-18 January 1996, 93-103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdulraham, A.A and Oladele, F.A. (2003) Stomata Complex Types, Size, Density, in Some Vegetable Species in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Botany, 16, 144-150.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Metcalfe, C.R. and Chalk, L. (1979) Anatomy of Dicotyledonous. 2nd Edition, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 456-473.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aguoru, C.U., Omoigui, L.O. and Olasan, J.O. (2015) Molecular Characterization of SolanumSpecies (Solanum aethiopicum Complex; Solanum macrocarpon and Solanum anguivi) Using Multiplex RAPD Primers. Journal of Plant Studies, 4, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jps.v4n1p27</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mbagwu, F.N and Nwachukwu, C.U. (2008) Comparative Leaf Epidermal Studies on S. macrocarpon and S. nigrum. Research Journal of Botany, 3, 45-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aguoru, C.U. and Okoli, B.E. (2008) Seed Coat Anatomy of Momordica (Cucurbitaceae) in Parts of Tropical Western Africa. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture and Food Systems, 2, 29-33</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aguoru, C.U. and Okoli, B.E. (2012) Comparative Stem and Petiole Anatomy of West African Species of Momordica L (Cucurbitaceae). African Journal of Plant Science, 16, 403-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJPS11.309</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68527-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bohac, J.R., Jones, A. and Austin, D.F. (1992) Unreduced Pollen: Proposed Mechanism of Polyploidization of Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas). HortScience, 27, 611.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>