<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1101401</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-68341</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Optimization of Force and Power Imposed on Continuous Tandem Cold Rolling Rollers Using a Multiple-Function Genetic Algorithm
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mehdi</surname><given-names>Safari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammadreza</surname><given-names>Moghoomi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mechanical Engineering, Arak University of Technology, Arak, Iran</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mechanical Engineering, Daneshpajoohan Higher Education Institute, Isfahan, Iran</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>m.safari@arakut.ac.ir(MS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>04</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>5</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>23</month>	<year>April</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   The amount of energy consumed in the production lines such as cold rolled process is one of the fundamental problems in the energy infrastructure of manufacturing sectors. Accordingly, much attention should be directed towards optimizing the power consumption of production lines using reasonable methods. Furthermore, the powers exerted on such equipment must be modified to find an optimized energy consumption level. This study tries to examine the optimization of forces and powers imposed on the continuous tandem cold rolling rollers of metal sheets using MATLAB and genetic algorithm. Firstly, some relationships and calculations of rolled metal sheets are analyzed. Then parameters, such as percentage of thickness reduction, mean pressure, yield stress, power of rollers and exerted torque, are calculated. All the governing relationships are programmed using MATLAB software. Having compared the mentioned two methods, genetic algorithm is used to determine the optimal required power. The results show that the optimized powers generated by genetic algorithm method are in good agreement with experimental observations. Also, the powers of rolling rollers and standard deviations of powers are calculated and, then, the two functions are compared and the optimum point between them is optimized. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Tandem Cold Rolling</kwd><kwd> Power of Roller</kwd><kwd> Genetic Algorithm</kwd><kwd> Optimization of Force</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The main purpose of the cold rolling process, in addition to obtaining good mechanical properties, is to achieve precision and very low thicknesses, the subject which is not possible in the hot rolling process. Nowadays, most cold rolling lines are designed continuously that are made up usually from 4 to 6 rolling shelves with four-roller. Surface of obtained cold-rolled sheets is harder and more smoothly than obtained hot-rolled sheets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref1">1</xref>] . Sheets and belts obtained from cold rolling are manufactured in various thickness of less than 0.1 mm to 6 mm as coils or sheets, by mutual rolled or consecutive shelves. Also, in the cold rolling process, 25% to 90% reduction in thickness can be achievable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref2">2</xref>] . In the cold rolling process, the main parameters such as thickness reduction at each stage of rolling, the size of the total reduction in thickness, width and thickness of the current sheet, constant thickness across the sheet, straightness of sheet surface, lubricate operations, tensile stresses of behind and front of the sheet, torque and each shelf rollers force, speed and coordination between the shelves should be carefully controlled in order to achieve a high quality sheet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref3">3</xref>] . So far, many efforts have been made for metal forming, especially for cold-rolled steel sheets. In 2001, Venkada et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref4">4</xref>] calculated the power consumption of rollers in the cold rolled process. Their results showed that the calculated reduction percentage in thickness of the sheet with 6 shelves roller, was in good agreement with report of Roberts. In 2000, Venga et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref5">5</xref>] tried to achieve optimal planning design for continuous cold rolling process. They designed an algorithm based on the genetic optimization with the aim of optimizing the stress and speed. The results of distribution of power, stress and sheet flatness showed that optimized results were in good agreement with experimental observations. In 2008, Yang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref6">6</xref>] showed that the results of optimization algorithms were satisfied and good in comparison with other programs. In 2009, Vining et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref7">7</xref>] considered the amount of carbon and carbide and reduction in the amount of rolling work as inputs of calculations to design a model that was able to predict at the same time and faster in an engineering environment. The output obtained from their studies suggested a set of parameters that were in a good agreement with experimental results. In 2004, Nivowski et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref8">8</xref>] suggested an approximate analytical solution by introducing a nonlinear mathematical model for oscillation system of continuous rolling racks. Their study showed that the results of proposed analytical solution were comparable with rolling experimental parameters. In 2005, Weng et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref9">9</xref>] by introducing an intelligent search mechanism for optimizing the planning with the assessment limitation of roll and the combination function of stress and distribution of power, achieved the maximum amount of rolling-work sheet safety. The model presented in this study, was able to solve multi-objective problems. In 2008, Pitner et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref10">10</xref>] proposed a new method that used the Rikaty equation to control rolling process. In 2008, Dean et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref11">11</xref>] used point-to-point, linear, quadratic method for optimal control of continuous cold rolling. To control the rollers, they used a new strategy to overcome the existing limitations, by designing multi-input and multi-output functions. Their results showed that the thickness of the output rolled sheet was between 0.5 onto 0.8 percent less than other studies, and caused stability of the rolling process. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, schematic of the cold rolling process is shown.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Schematics of the cold rolling process</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x6.png"/></fig><p>The amount of energy consumed in the production lines such as cold rolled process is one of the fundamental problems in the energy infrastructure of manufacturing sectors. Accordingly, much attention should be directed towards optimizing the power consumption of production lines using reasonable methods. Furthermore, the powers exerted on such equipment must be modified to find an optimized energy consumption level. This study tries to examine the optimization of forces and powers imposed on the continuous tandem cold rolling rollers of metal sheets using MATLAB and genetic algorithm. Firstly, some relationships and calculations of rolled metal sheets are analyzed. Then parameters, such as percentage of thickness reduction, mean pressure, yield stress, power of rollers and exerted torque, are calculated. All the governing relationships are programmed using MATLAB software. Having compared the mentioned two methods, genetic algorithm is used to determine the optimal required power. The results show that the optimized powers generated by genetic algorithm method are in good agreement with experimental observations. Also, the powers of rolling rollers and standard deviations of powers are calculated and, then, the two functions are compared and the optimum point between them is optimized.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Genetic Algorithm</title><p>Genetic algorithm is a learning approach based on biological evolution which is taken from Darwinian Theory of evolution in 1859. In 1970, the main idea of this method is introduced by Heland, Deyjon and Gowgeldberg. These methods are also called with the name of the evaluation algorithm too.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Characteristics of Genetic Algorithm</title><p>In genetic algorithms, populations of points are searched in parallel (instead of a point). Also probability transition rules are used (instead of deterministic transition rules). In the genetic algorithm, it does not require to information about the differentiable of the objective function (that is enough for the problem to define a fitness function). In addition, the genetic algorithm is useful for noisy environments and can be easily applied to multi- objective problems. This algorithm is located on the class of random optimization algorithms. It is especially used for complex optimization problems with an unknown search space. In general, we can say that the genetic algorithm has the following characteristics:</p><p>1) Instead of encoding parameters, encoding set of them.</p><p>2) Instead of searching for a spot, looking for population of points.</p><p>3) Instead of using derivations or other auxiliary information, directly using information available on existing results.</p><p>4) In this type of algorithms, instead of absolute rules, using the probability rules to change.</p><p>5) In the genetic algorithm, instead of searching particular hypothesis or simple and complete ones, makes the new hypothesis by changing and combining sequential components, into the best possible hypothesis.</p><p>6) At each step, a set of assumptions that are called population, are derived by replacing part of the current population with the children who have acquired the best available hypothesis.</p><p>7) In properties of a new generation, except in exceptional circumstances where mutations may occur, usually the new generations are more compatible with nature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref12">12</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Optimizing Method by Genetic Algorithms</title><p>Genetic algorithms approach to optimize problems through a processs similar to natural selection methods and natural genetic in the biological sciences. These algorithms are widely used in the past decade as search and optimization tools in various fields such as business, science and engineering. Flowchart of genetic algorithm to optimize is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>In the genetic algorithm that is used in this research, three key issues can be optimized including power consumption, standard deviation of power and optimization of these two functions together. Finally, the variables of the problem are the thicknesses of the entrance and existence of the five shelves continuous cold rolling and tensile forces between shelves. In genetic algorithms, it is necessary for optimizing that started a set of solutions (chromosomes) with initial value and investigated the problem again, and then by using a fitness function, evaluated the existing problem. Accordingly the best chromosomes are selected in the mating pool and treated on there with a mutation occurs, and then a series of solutions are presented. In this paper, for calculation of cold</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Flowchart of genetic algorithm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref13">13</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x7.png"/></fig><p>rolling, initially the system inputs are defined as follows: Input thickness of sheet, output thickness of sheet, friction coefficient of rollers, radius of rollers, width of the sheet and tensile force between roller and shelf. Then all the parameters listed above have been considered the coming three basic purposes:</p><p>1) Optimizing rolling power of shelves.</p><p>2) Optimizing the standard deviation of the power consumption of rollers.</p><p>3) Finding optimum points between the above two functions.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Analytical Relations of the Cold Rolling Process</title><p>Analytical calculations in this paper are based on the Ston, Parkinz and Okeland theories, and considered process is 5-shelfrolling. Using the relations, the value of power, torque and eventually power of rolling is calculated. The percent of reduction in sheet thickness in each shelf is calculated with Equation (1). Also, the average value of tensile yield stress comes out from Equations of (2) and (3).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula762"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula763"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In Equation (1), r is assumed reduction percent in the thickness of sheet in each shelf. h<sub>in</sub> and h<sub>1</sub> are the input and output thickness of sheet on the shelves respectively. Also, in Equation (2) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the average value of tensile yield stress. It should be noted that in the rolling and other metal forming processes, for calculation of force and energy of deformation variable yield stress of the plate can be replaced with average yield stress. In the Equation (2), K and n are the coefficients of the resistance and work hardening of steel respectively that can be obtained from Ludovic equation which are available from charts of the stress-strain behavior of steels. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is primary strain and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is plane strain.</p><p>Equation (3) is used to calculate the average yield stress. In this equation, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the average yield stress, which in the plane strain conditions and its relationship to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula764"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (4) is used to calculate the mean pressure Pm of rollers. In this relation hm is the average value of the input thickness and output thickness of each shelf and μ is the friction coefficient of process and also Ld is the length of plastic region, and σm is the average stress.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula765"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Ludovic equation is presented in Equation (5). In this equation, ε is the plane strain and the coefficients of K and n, are extracted from the stress-strain curve [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula766"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As the rolling process that is investigated in this paper has pre-tensile and post-tensile stresses, then average stress is calculated from Equation (6). In this equation, σ<sub>ft</sub> is the pre-tensile stress and σ<sub>bt</sub> is the post-tensile stress.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula767"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The roller force can be calculated from Equation (7).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula768"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the Equation (7) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the roller radius after deformation, Δh is difference between the entry and exit thickness of rolled sheet, W is plate width and Pm are the average pressure. According to Equation (8) power calculation is presented in terms of the width of sheet as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula769"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the Equation (8) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the radius of the roller after depreciation and Δh is difference between the input and output thicknesses of the sheet among the rollers. Equation (9) can be used to calculating the radius of roller after depreciation (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula770"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Due to the presence of two rollers on each shelf (rolling stage), the torque created around the center of each rollers will be calculated as Equation (10).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula771"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In Equations (9) and (10), F is the force of Roller, W is the width of sheet, M is the torque and C is a constant that is considered to be 0.4 for cold rolling process.</p><p>Finally, in Equation (11) the power of rolling can be calculated. In this equation P is the Roller power, M is the torque and ω is the angular velocity.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula772"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> schematic of a continuous cold rolling process is shown.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Optimization Procedure</title><p>Main goal of this article is using a genetic algorithm to optimize the rolling process in 5-shelf cold rolling. In this study, the output thickness of each shelf and tensile forces between the shelves are assumed as variable parameters that should be optimized. In the optimization procedure, Equations of (12) and (13) are used as objec-</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Schematic of a continuous cold rolling process</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x27.png"/></fig><p>tive functions and using genetic algorithm toolbox of Matlab software variable parameters are optimized. In the optimization investigations, the population and number of generations should be defined. In this paper combined population of 30 people and a maximum of 100 generations are assumed. Therefore, two objective functions are as follow:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula773"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula774"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In Equations (12) and (13) the power values and standard deviations of powers are considered to be optimized. In Equation (13), Pd is the roller power (KW) and the standard deviation is used to optimize it. The values of variable parameters of the cold rolling process are obtained from experimental tests. Therefore, the actual final amount of entry and exit thicknesses of the sheet, and the coefficients K and n are calculated as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula775"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the actual radius of the rollers and in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, the coefficients of friction in the rollers of each shelf are presented. In the continuous cold rolling process, the experimental Range of some basic parameters is as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68341-ref16">16</xref>] . Since the variables of the problem are the characteristics such as input and output thicknesses in each shelf and tensile forces between shelves, therefore the percentage of reduction in sheet thickness at each cold rolled shelf is accessible through standard tables. In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, reduction of sheet thickness in each shelf is presented. Upper limit is the maximum allowable reduction in thickness and lower limit indicates the minimum allowable thickness of shelves.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, the tensile forces of the shelves that are taken from the standard are shown. Also, in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, the maximum power consumption of each shelf is presented. After programming in MATLAB software, the results of average yield stress of the plate, sheet thickness, average distribution of tensile stress in each shelf, average thickness of the output and input sheets, distribution of tensile force between the shelves, the torques in rolling stages, average pressure of shelves, tensile force distribution between the shelves according to the Stone’s theory, actual (real) consumption power of each cold rolling shelf, average optimized power and a comparison between powers in both actual and optimized modes are presented in Figures 4-13. In these figures, the horizontal axis represents the five shelves of cold rolling process. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, the distribution of the average yield stress can be seen in each shelf. The maximum stress is occurred in the last stage of rolling (the fifth shelf) and its value is 700 MPa. It should be mentioned that the average yield stress of sheet increases due to work hardening.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, the value of sheet thickness in each shelf is shown. As it is seen maximum value of thickness is in the first shelf and the minimum value of thickness is in the fifth shelf. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>, the average distribution of tensile stress in each shelf is presented. As it is seen maximum value of tensile stresses is occurred in the fifth shelf rollers with the value of 606 MPa.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> represents the average thickness of the output and input sheets which the highest average thickness is seen in the first shelf (2.16 mm). In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>, the distributions of tensile force between the shelves and the torques in rolling stages are shown respectively. As can be seen, the maximum tensile force occurs in shelves 2 (6851.3 tones) and 3 (6771.9 tones). As the largest percentage of decrease in the thickness of the roller shelves is occurred in the first shelves then the torque created in the first shelf has the maximum value in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0, the average pressure of shelves is shown. As can be seen, the minimum value is in the first shelf</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Actual radius of the rollers (mm)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>5</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>4</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>1</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >281</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >284</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >261</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Coefficients of friction in the rollers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >5μ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4μ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3μ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2μ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1μ</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The reduction of sheet thickness in each shelf (%)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tandem</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Reduction of sheet thickness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Tensile forces of the shelves</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tandem</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The tensile forces of the shelves (Ton)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Maximum power consumption of each shelf</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shelf</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum power (KW)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3900</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5850</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> The distribution of the average yield stress in each shelf</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x31.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> The value of sheet thickness in each shelf</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x32.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> The average distribution of the tensile stress</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x33.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> The average thickness</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x34.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> The distribution of tensile force between the shelves</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x35.png"/></fig><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> The torque created in rolling</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x36.png"/></fig><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> The average pressure of shelves</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x37.png"/></fig><fig id="fig11"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> The tensile force distribution between the shelves according to the Stone’s theory</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x38.png"/></fig><fig id="fig12"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> The actual (real) consumption power of each cold rolling shelf (KW)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x39.png"/></fig><fig id="fig13"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3</label><caption><title> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="SCIRP_68341.files/image001.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Optimized consumption power and standard deviation</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x40.png"/></fig><fig id="fig14"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4</label><caption><title> A comparison graph of powers in both actual and optimized</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x41.png"/></fig><p>(551 Mpa) and the maximum value is in the fifth shelf (1003 MPa). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1 shows the tensile force distribution between the shelves according to the Stone’s theory. As can be seen in this figure, the maximum rotational torque is occurred in the first shelf and minimum rotational torque is occurred in the fifth shelf. Also <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2 shows the actual (real) consumption power of each cold rolling shelf. It can be seen in this figure that the maximum power is related to third shelf with a value of 3005 kW. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2 and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>, are shown the actual and optimized consumption power in the continuous cold rolling factory.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3 optimized consumption power and standard deviation is presented. As it is seen the average optimized power is 911 kW, and variance amount of optimized consumption power is 1660 kW, and accordingly, the results obtained of the genetic algorithm represents that standard deviation of power is 402 kW. The results show that by optimizing the consumption power, power of production line will be reduced by 48% and this result is in good agreement with experimental observations. Obviously, the average value of consumption power is reduced with the same value after optimization. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4, a comparison between actual and optimized powers is shown. As it is seen, in the shelves of 2, 3 and 4 which have the highest power for reducing the thickness of sheet under rolling process, the actual consumption powers are 2445, 2960 and 2047 kW respectively, while after optimization these values have been reduced to 1189, 1449 and 935 kW respectively.</p><p>To optimize consumption power and standard deviation of power, two functions are defined as bellow:</p><p>Minimum of power: Object 1.</p><p>Standard deviation of power: Object 2.</p><p>The relationship between these two functions is presented in Equation (14).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68341-formula776"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For using Equation (14) weighted coefficient of each function must be defined in the computing of Genetic Algorithm. In the Genetic Algorithm according to the importance of both functions (power and standard deviation), the weighted coefficient of 0.5 is selected for them. It should be noted that according to Equation (14), not only the power and standard deviation of power are optimized separately but also the two functions have been optimized comparatively. One of the important parameters that should be checked in the cold rolling process is the percentage of thickness reduction of output sheet from each shelf. In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> the optimized thicknesses for each shelf that is extracted from the Genetic Algorithm are presented.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5, a comparison of thickness of the sheet after rolling in each shelf between actual and optimized states is shown. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6, percentage of thickness reduction on each shelf before and after optimizing process is shown.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> The values of actual and optimized powers in the cold rolling process</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Criteria</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Actual</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Optimization</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Power (KW)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8807.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4585</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average power (KW)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1761.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >908.1264</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard deviation power</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >360.7850</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> The optimized thicknesses extracted from the Genetic Algorithm (in mm) are as following</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >h<sub>5</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >h<sub>4</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >h<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >h<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >h<sub>1</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6487</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6961</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8864</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9283</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig15"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5</label><caption><title> The comparison between the thicknesses of the sheets after rolling on each shelf in two actual and optimized modes</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x43.png"/></fig><fig id="fig16"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6</label><caption><title> The percentage of thickness reduction on each shelf, before optimizing (real)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x44.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Energy optimization in continuous cold rolling process is depending on factors such as optimization, the tensile force among shelves, consumption power, and percentage of thickness reduction in sheet. For this purpose in this paper, using cold-rolling production line variables of the integrated steel production of Mobarakeh Company (Isfahan, Iran), with rolling engineering relations and programming in MATLAB software, power consumption was calculated and then standard deviation of power was optimized. The result indicated that with optimizing the con- sumption power, the power was reduced as 48.24% in continuous cold-rolling (Tandem) production line of sheet.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mehdi Safari,Mohammadreza Moghoomi, (2015) Optimization of Force and Power Imposed on Continuous Tandem Cold Rolling Rollers Using a Multiple-Function Genetic Algorithm. Open Access Library Journal,02,1-13. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1101401</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>List of Symbols</title><p>F: Tensile force between the shelves (N)</p><p>h<sub>in</sub>: Input thickness of sheet on the shelves (mm)</p><p>K: Extracted from the graph of (Mpa) stress-real strain of stress experiment</p><p>M: The torque created in rolling N∙m</p><p>Pm: The average pressure of shelves (Mpa)</p><p>R: Radius of the roller (mm)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>: Radius of the roller after (mm) depreciation</p><p>r: Percent reduction in the thickness</p><p>W: Plate width (mm)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>: Average tensile yield stress (Mpa)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>: Primary strain</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>: Friction coefficient of rolled</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>: Post-tensioning stress (Mpa)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>: Pre-tensioning (Mpa)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68341x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>: Average stress (Mpa)</p><p>ω: Angular velocity (Rad/s)</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68341-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moshksar, M. (2013) Rolling Engineering Principles. 3rd Edition, Shiraz University Press, Shiraz, 9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moshksar, M. (2013) Rolling Engineering Principles. 3rd Edition, Shiraz University Press, Shiraz, 335.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aghadavoodi, F., Golestanian, H. and Negahbani, N. (2011) Optimization of Reduction Setting and Inter-Stand Tensions for Tandem Cold Mills Using Genetic Algorithm. Journal of Solid Mechanics in Engineering, 3, 55-67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Safari, H. and Masuodi, A. (2012) Optimization of Plat-Fin Heat Exchanger with Genetic Algorithm. Journal of Aerospace Mechanics, 8, 55-68.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zandieh, M. (2013) Genetic Algorithm. Version PDF, 31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pittner, J. and Simaan, M.A. (2008) Optimal Control of Tandem Cold Rolling Using a Pointwise Linear Quadratic Technique with Trims. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 130, 11 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pittner, J. and Simaan, M.A. (2008) Control of a Continuous Tandem Cold Metal Rolling Process. Control Engineering Practice, 16, 1379-1390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.03.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, D.D. and Tieu, A.K. (2005) Computational Intelligence-Based Process Optimization for Tandem Cold Rollin. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 3, 479-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/AMP-200053535</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">&amp;#346;wi&amp;#261;toniowskib, A. and Bara, A. (2004) Interdependence between the Rolling Speed and Non-Linear Vibrations of the Mill System. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 155-156, 2116-2212.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Winninga, M. and Brahmeb, A. (2009) Prediction of Cold Rolling Texture of Steels Using an Artificial Neural Network. Computational Materials Science, 46, 800-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.04.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, J. and Che, H. (2008) Algorithm-Based Optimization Used in Rolling Schedule. International Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 15, 18-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(08)60024-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wanga, D.D. and Yuen, W.Y.D. (2000) Toward a Heuristic Optimum Design of Rolling Schedules for Tandem Cold Rolling Mills. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 13, 397-406.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0952-1976(00)00016-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Venkata Reddya, N. and Suryanarayanaa, G. (2001) A Set-Up Model for Tandem Cold Rolling Mills. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 116, 269-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01007-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yuen, W.Y., et al. (1985) Thermal Effects in Cold Rolling. Proceedings of the International Conference Organized by the Institute of Metal, Advances in Cold Rolling Technology, 57.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miyake, H., et al. (1985) Advanced Fully Continuos Tandem Cold Rolling Mill for Thin Gauge Steel Strip. Proceedings of the International Conference Organized by the Institute of Metal, Advances in Cold Rolling Technology, 38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68341-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moshksar, M. (2013) Rolling Engineering Principles. 3rd Edition, Shiraz University Press, Shiraz, 20.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>