<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1101466</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-68304</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Alternative Approach for the Solution of the Black-Scholes Partial Differential Equation for European Call Option
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sunday</surname><given-names>Emmanuel Fadugba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Adedoyin</surname><given-names>Olayinka Ajayi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematical Sciences, Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>emmasfad2006@yahoo.com(SEF)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>04</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>13</month>	<year>April</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   In this paper we present an alternative approach for the solution of the Black-Scholes partial differential equation for European call option which pays dividend yield using the modified Mellin transform method. The approach used in this paper does not require variables transformation. We also extend the modified Mellin transform method for the valuation of European call option which pays dividend yield. The numerical results show that the modified Mellin transform is accurate, mutually consistent and agrees with the values of the Black-Scholes model. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Black-Scholes Partial Differential Equation</kwd><kwd> Dividend Yield</kwd><kwd> European Call Option</kwd><kwd> Modified Mellin Transform Method</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Option valuation has been studied extensively in the last three decades. An option on an underlying asset is defined as an asymmetric contract that entitles the holder to buy or sell the underlying asset at a specified price on or before a certain date. The underlying asset includes stocks, foreign currencies, and stock indices, just to mention a few.</p><p>European options give the holder the right to trade the underlying asset in the future at a previously agreed price. European options can be exercised only on the expiry date. American options give the holder more rights than their European equivalent and can therefore be more valuable, and they can never be less valuable. The main point of interest with American-style options is deciding when to exercise. Most of options traded on exchange are of American type and therefore the valuation problem for American options has received a lot of attention.</p><p>Until 1973, the valuation of an option was done by little more than guesswork. Black and Scholes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68304-ref1">1</xref>] published their seminar work on options valuation, in which they described a mathematical frame work for finding the fair price of a European option by means of a non-arbitrage argument to describe a second order partial differential equation which governs the evolution of the option price with respect to the time to expiry and the price of the underlying asset. Since then, there has been an explosive growth, both in the trading and the study of options of various kinds. Despite the success of the Black-Scholes model on hedging and pricing contingent claims, Merton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68304-ref2">2</xref>] noted early that options quoted on the markets differ systematically from their predicted values, which led up to questioning the distributional assumptions based on geometric wiener process.</p><p>The Mellin transform in the theory of option pricing was introduced by Panini and Srivastav [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68304-ref3">3</xref>] . They derived the expression for the free boundary and price of an American perpetual put as the limit of finite lived options. Nwozo and Fadugba [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68304-ref4">4</xref>] considered the Mellin transform method for the valuation of some vanilla power options with non-dividend yield. They extended the Mellin transform method to derive the price of European and Ame- rican power put options with non-dividend yield. They also derived the fundamental valuation formula known as the Black-Scholes model using the convolution property of the Mellin transform method. J&#243;dar et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68304-ref5">5</xref>] considered a new direct method for solving the Black-Scholes equation using the Mellin transforms. F. Al Azemi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68304-ref6">6</xref>] obtained an analytical solution of the Black-Scholes equation for the European and the American put options. For mathematical backgrounds, transform methods in the theory of options valuation and some numerical methods for options valuation see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68304-ref7">7</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68304-ref12">12</xref>] just to mention a few.</p><p>In this paper, we shall consider a new approach which does not require variables transformation for the solution of homogeneous Black-Scholes partial differential equation for European call option with dividend yield using the modified Mellin transform proposed by Frontczak and Sch&#246;bel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68304-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>The structure of the paper is organized as follows. In the next section, we give an overview of the most fundamental ideas and mathematical tools needed for the Mellin transforms. We also present the most relevant properties of the Mellin transforms. Section 3 presents a new approach for the solution of the homogeneous Black- Scholes partial differential equation for European call option which pays dividend yield. Section 4 presents the numerical experiments and discussion of results. Section 5 concludes the paper.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Mellin Transform and Its Fundamental Properties in the Theory of Option Valuation</title><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a function defined on the positive real axis<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The Mellin transformation denoted by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the operation mapping the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> into the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined on the complex plane by the relation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula655"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is called the Mellin transform of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In general, the integral does exist only for complex values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> depend on the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to transform. This introduces what is called the strip of definition of the Mellin transform that will be denoted by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In some cases, this strip may extend to half-plane <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or to the complex v-plane <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Conversely, the inversion formula of (1) is defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula656"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the integration is along a vertical line through<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Some of the basic fundamental properties of the Mellin transforms are detailed below.</p><p>If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined on the positive real axis<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then the following properties hold.</p><p>a) Shifting property</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula657"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>b) Scaling property</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula658"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>c) The Mellin transform of derivatives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula659"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the symbol <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined for k integer by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula660"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equations (3) and (6) can be used in various ways to find the effect of linear combination of differential operator such that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, k, m integers. The most remarkable results are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula661"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, k a positive integer and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Homogeneous Black-Scholes Partial Differential Equation for European Call Option with Dividend Paying Stock in the Domain of the Modified Mellin Transform Method</title><p>Let us consider the homogeneous Black-Scholes partial differential equation for European call option <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which pays dividend yield with the initial and boundary conditions given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula662"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the volatility, r is a risk-free interest rate, K is called the strike price, and T is the maturity date. It is a known fact that the partial differential equation in (7) has a closed form solution obtained after several change of variables and solving certain related diffusion equations. This procedure is not applicable in the vector framework where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a vector and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, r are matrices.</p><p>Now, observe that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula663"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x41.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is called fundamental strip, the Mellin transform for European call option does not exist since the integral does not converge. Here we shall make use of the modified Mellin transform.</p><p>The modified Mellin transform for the price of European call option is defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula664"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the inversion formula for the modified Mellin transform is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula665"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking the modified Mellin transform of the Black-Scholes partial differential equation for European call option in (7), we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula666"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the properties of the Mellin transforms, we have the following modified Mellin transforms</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula667"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (12) into (11) and simplifying further yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula668"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Integrating (13) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula669"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x50.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Setting<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then (14) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula670"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a constant of integration to be determined and it is defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula671"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>can be obtained by taking the modified Mellin transform of the initial condition of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula672"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula673"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equations (15), (16) and (18), we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula674"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The modified Mellin inversion of (19) is obtained as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula675"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula>A New Direct Approach for the Solution of the Black-Scholes Partial Differential Equation for European Call Option with Dividend Paying Stock<p>An alternative approach for the solution of the homogeneous Black-Scholes partial differential equation for the European call option with dividend paying stock is summarized in the theorem below:</p><p>Theorem 3.1.</p><p>Let the price of a European call option denoted by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be Mellin transformable and continuous, then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula676"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a solution of the homogeneous Black-Scholes partial differential equation for the European call option with dividend yield given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula677"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof: We want to prove that the expression (20) is a solution of the Black-Scholes partial differential equation for European call option given by (7). Let us assume that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula678"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (21) into (20) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula679"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> into<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula680"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is Mellin transformable and continuous, setting <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then (22) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula681"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (22) is well defined and satisfies (24).</p><p>Using the definition of the modified Mellin transform, then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula682"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula683"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x74.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the differentiation theorem of parameter integrals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68304-ref14">14</xref>] and the fact that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula684"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x75.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then it follows that upon differentiation of (22), we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula685"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x76.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (22) and (28) into the Black-Scholes partial differential equation for European call option given by (7), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula686"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hence the price of the European call option denoted by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and given by (20) is a solution of (7) and the result is established.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Numerical Experiment</title><p>Experiment 1</p><p>We consider the valuation of European call option with nine months to expiration via the modified Mellin transform method. The stock index is 95, the exercise price is 90, the risk-neutral interest rate is 0.2 per year, the dividend yield is 0.06 per year and the volatility is 0.3 per year.</p><p>The parameters are:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula687"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The results obtained are displayed below.</p><p>The value of the analytic pricing formula is 16.943.</p><p>The modified Mellin transform put price is obtained as 16.943.</p><p>Experiment 2</p><p>We consider the performance of the modified Mellin transform method against the “true” Black-Scholes model and binomial model for the valuation of European calloption which pays dividend yield q with the following parameters.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68304-formula688"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68304x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The results obtained are shown in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> below.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The effect of dividend yield on the performance of the modified Mellin transform method against the “true” Black- Scholes model and binomial model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68304-ref15">15</xref>] for the valuation of European call option</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Black-Scholes Model</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Binomial Model with N = 1000</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Modified Mellin Transform Method</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >q= 0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.101</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.885</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.883</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.885</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.257</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.258</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.257</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.627</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.628</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.627</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.580</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.580</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.580</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >q= 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.553</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.553</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.553</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.914</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.912</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.914</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.862</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.863</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.862</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.835</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.837</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.835</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.426</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.426</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.426</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >q= 0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.502</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.052</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.007</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.541</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.542</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.541</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.126</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.125</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.356</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.355</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.356</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >q= 0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.595</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.595</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.595</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.162</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.162</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.292</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.293</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.292</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.492</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.493</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.492</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.367</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >q= 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.180</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.377</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.377</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.113</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.936</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.937</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.936</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.461</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.460</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.461</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>Discussion of Results<p>From Experiment 1, we can see that the price of European call option via the modified Mellin transform method and analytic option pricing formula are the same. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the effect of dividend yield on the performance of the modified Mellin transform method against the “true” Black-Scholes model and binomial model for the valuation of European call option. The results obtained show that the higher the dividend yield, the smaller the values of the three methods. The modified Mellin transform is more accurate than the binomial model when pricing European call option with dividend yield. Hence the modified Mellin transform is mutually consistent and agrees with the values of the Black-Scholes model.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Financial modeling in the area of option valuation involves detailed knowledge about stochastic processes describing the asset payoffs. In this paper, we developed an alternative approach for the solution of the homogeneous Black-Scholes partial differential equation for European call option with dividend yield using the modified Mellin transform method. The approach used in this paper does not require variables transformation. The modified Mellin transform method seems likely to be quick and accurate when pricing European call option with dividend yield.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sunday Emmanuel Fadugba,Adedoyin Olayinka Ajayi, (2015) Alternative Approach for the Solution of the Black-Scholes Partial Differential Equation for European Call Option. Open Access Library Journal,02,1-8. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1101466</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68304-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973) The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/260062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Merton, R. (1973) Theory of Rational Option Pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4, 141-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3003143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Panini, R. and Srivastav, R.P. (2004) Option Pricing with Mellin Transforms. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40, 43-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2004.07.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwozo, C.R. and Fadugba, S.E. (2014) On the Accuracy of Binomial Model for the Valuation of Standard Options with Dividend Yield in the Context of Black-Scholes Model. IAENG International Journal of Applied Mathematics, 44, 33-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Apostol, T.M. (1957) Mathematical Analysis. Addison Wesley, Reading.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frontczak, R. and Sch&amp;#246;bel, R. (2009) On Modified Mellin Transforms, Gauss-Laguerre Quadrature and the Valuation of American Call Options. Tübinger Diskussionsbeitrag, No. 320.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wilmott, P., Howison, S. and Dewynne, J. (1997) The Mathematics of Financial Derivatives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wilmott, P., Howison, S. and Dewynne, J. (1993) Option Pricing: Mathematical Models and Computation. Oxford Financial Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fadugba, S.E. (2014) The Mellin Transforms Method as an Alternative Analytic Solution for the Valuation of Geometric Asian Option. Applied and Computational Mathematics, Special Issue: Computational Finance, 3, 1-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwozo, C.R. and Fadugba, S.E. (2014) Performance Measure of Laplace Transforms for Pricing Path Dependent Options. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 94, 175-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v94i2.5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwozo, C.R. and Fadugba, S.E. (2015) On Stochastic Volatility in the Valuation of European Options. British Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 5, 104-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/BJMCS/2015/13176</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwozo, C.R. and Fadugba, S.E. (2015) On Two Transform Methods for the Valuation of Contingent Claims. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 5, 88-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmf.2015.52009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al Azemi, F., Al Azemi, A. and Boyadjiev, I. (2014) Mellin Transform Method for Solving the Black-Scholes Equation. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 97, 287-301.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jódar, L., Sevilla, P., Cortes, J.C. and Sala, R. (2005) A New Direct Method for Solving the Black-Scholes Equation. Applied Mathematics and Letters, 18, 29-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2002.12.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68304-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwozo, C.R. and Fadugba, S.E. (2014) Mellin Transform Method for the Valuation of Some Vanilla Power Options with Non-Dividend Yield. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 96, 79-104.http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v96i1.7</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>