Research in plant molecular biology starts with nucleic acid isolation and purification followed by amplification [1] . Nucleic acids commonly extracted in routine molecular work are: bacteria plasmid DNA, chloroplast DNA, mitochondrial DNA, mRNA extractions and total genomic DNA extractions [1] . According to [2] , the principles of DNA isolation are the same. They all involve tissue pulverization and digestion of other components except DNA followed by purification. Total genomic DNA extraction is very common in molecular research. Different methods of plant DNA extraction exist each with its unique protocol [2] . The cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method and DNA extraction kits are often reported in literatures [3] - [5] . QIAquick purification kit and other DNA extraction kits are also widely available [6] . In most cases, authors do not disclose the extraction methods used in literature most especially when generalized procedures previously used by others are reported. Though there are many methods of DNA extraction available on the internet, they are often not available in literatures. According to [1] , the factors that influence the choice of extraction method are: quality of extraction, cost of reagent, familiarity of procedures and simplicity of protocol. Many protocols on DNA extraction and purification are rather complicated to use. The simple and timely procedures of extracting DNA cannot be over emphasized in molecular research. The aim of this piece was to present the efficacy of FTA PlantSaver card and DNAzol method of plant DNA extraction using optimized simple protocols to be recommended in the molecular research on eggplant.

Research activities were carried out in the Molecular Biology Laboratory of the University of Agriculture, Makurdi Nigeria. Eggplant seeds of nine accessions were planted in small transparent containers labeled D1-D9 respectively. DNA was extracted from fresh and healthy leaf samples (18-day-old) using FTA PlantSaver card and DNAzol methods. Complex protocols were continuously subjected to modification until optimized and simpler procedures were achieved in extracting sufficient quantity of DNA. Quality of genomic DNA extracts was verified on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Images were captured on the UV-transilluminator. Other extractions were immediately followed by PCR amplification of nine DNAs labeled D1-D9 using nine (9) RAPD primers: OPP-11, OPV-04, OPQ-07, OPU-19, OPQ-03, V-19, B-18, OPU-13 and OPU-15 respectively. Amplification was achieved on a thermal cycler (Applied Biosystem version) where 1 µl of DNA extracted from DNAzol or 1 purified FTA disc served as the DNA template in the reactions. Amplified products were resolved on 3% agarose gel electrophoresis and viewed on the UV-transilluminator. All results were compared accordingly.

DNA extraction is the first step in the study of plant DNA as it precedes all other molecular activities [7] [8] . The two methods compared in this report extracted sufficient quantity of DNA from leaf samples. Based on this outcome, the recommended optimized protocols are given in Table 1.

Analysis of the DNAzol method shows that more leaf samples are needed to achieve 1 g pulverized leaf tissue required. This suggests that more viable seeds should be planted (Figure 1). This becomes a major challenge as it cannot be employed in a situation where few seeds are viable. The use of mortar in pulverizing leaf tissue consumes much space in the laboratory most especially when extracting DNA from many plant sources. Furthermore, there should be a balance between the pulverized tissue and DNAzol reagent in relation to the chloroform in the tube. Adequate knowledge of the use of centrifuge machine is also required for this method. Despite the above challenges, the DNAzol method is a potent means of extracting quality genomic DNA which can be verified instantly on the gel as shown in Figure 2. Moreover, the extracted DNA properly stored can be PCR amplified many times when needed [7] .

The use of FTA card method, on the other hand, is recommended when at least one leaf sample is required. It is often employed in a situation of low seed viability. At least, one seedling is sufficient enough for DNA extraction. It is a simpler method than DNAzol but requires repeated DNA washing. It does not consume space as one card can be used for a maximum of eight accessions when the squares are properly demarcated [7] - [9] . It is the preferred method when extracting DNA from many accessions (Figures 3(a)-(b)). The use of hazardous chloroform is avoided and no centrifugation is required [10] . However, the separation of DNA from the disc to be verified directly on the gel becomes a major challenge. Instead, the DNA in the disc is PCR amplified directly to avert the rigor of DNA separation. This means that the quality of the DNA extracted is often not checked because of this challenge, but sufficient quantity of DNA in the disc can be amplified to achieve good band profile (Figure 4). Based on the comparative analysis of the two methods, the FTA card method is therefore

strongly recommended for timely and quality DNA extraction and amplification from a large number of samples. Generally, the two optimized protocols are efficient in DNA extraction which may replace the use of complicated protocols. This would help researchers in achieving quality DNA extraction and also help save resources, energy and time. The protocols presented in this report may therefore be used in extracting DNA from other crops.

Celestine Uzoma Aguoru,Lucky O. Omoigui,Joseph Olalekan Olasan, (2015) Comparative Optimized Protocols of DNA Extraction and Purification Using FTA PlantSaver Card and DNAzol Methods for Eggplant (Solanum Species) Studies in North Central Nigeria. Open Access Library Journal,02,1-5. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1101406