<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1102334</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-68245</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Some Studies on the Lorentz Theory of Radiation Reaction in Relation to a Charged Particle Acted on by a Constant Force in a Finite Time Interval
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rajat</surname><given-names>Roy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rajatroy@ece.iitkgp.ernet.in</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>02</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>4</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>1</month>	<year>February</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   An attempt to predict some experimental verification of the Lorentz theory of radiation reaction using theoretical methods is being made. The dynamics of charged particles using the equations of motion of this theory is compared to that of uncharged particles. Some verifiable consequence of preacceleration is also worked out. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Lorentz Theory of Radiation Reaction</kwd><kwd> Experimental Verification</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>It is well known fact that the theory of radiation reaction in electrodynamics as worked out by Lorentz [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68245-ref1">1</xref>] (actually by Lorentz, Abraham and Dirac) has solutions, which exhibits a runaway nature and/or non-causal pre- acceleration. In fact the non-causal pre-acceleration without runaway makes more sense and in this paper we will only be concerned with this solution of the equation of motion. It is generally believed that the non-causal pre-acceleration exists for a short duration (typically <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> seconds for the electron) when it becomes comparable in magnitude to that of the actual acceleration and hence can never be detected in an experiment. Below we study the case of a charged particle when it is moving under the influence of a constant force preferably of a non-electromagnetic origin for a finite time duration and compare it with the dynamics of an uncharged particle of equal mass under the action of the same force. The second particle of course does not experience radiation reaction. Also we put a different initial condition and try to find out if there is some measurable parameter which detects pre-acceleration in an experiment. In the last section we discuss some difficulties with the attempts to eliminate pre-acceleration theoretically as they exist in literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68245-ref2">2</xref>] . Only non-relativistic dynamical equations have been used for the present and that too for one dimensional motion.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Dynamical Equation of the Charged Particle with Some Initial Condition and Acted on by a Constant Force f<sub>ext</sub> from 0 to t Seconds</title><p>From Equation (1.1) of ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68245-ref1">1</xref>] we can write the equation of motion in one dimension as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68245-formula314"><label>, (1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is about <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> sec. for the electron and m is its mass. From Equations (1.2) and (1.3) of the same reference we can write the pre accelerated solution without runaway as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68245-formula315"><label>. (2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For the special case of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to be a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> between <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we can represent it mathematically in terms of the unit step function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68245-formula316"><label>, (3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We also prefer <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to be of non electromagnetic origin so that it can act equally well on charged and uncharged particles alike. This restriction can be relaxed when uncharged particles are not under consideration as we see in Section 3. Thus for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the type described by Equation (3) the acceleration <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> from Equation (2) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68245-formula317"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The time derivative of acceleration and the velocity respectively are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68245-formula318"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68245-formula319"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The constant K will be zero if<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For the case of the uncharged particle of the same mass which we have already assumed to be accelerated by the same force <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in accordance with Newton’s laws the velocity is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68245-formula320"><label>(constant), (7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the subscript un of v denotes that it is the velocity of the uncharged particle. For <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we again get the constant<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. With this set of initial conditions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> it is easy to show that the final velocity attained at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is given identically for the two particles to be</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68245-formula321"><label>. (8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus in the Lorentz theory of radiation reaction the change in kinetic energy of a radiating charged particle is equal to that of a non radiating uncharged particle when acted on by equal external forces in equal intervals of time. This fact can be determined in an experiment. The energy radiated out by the charged particle is given by the Larmor’s formula</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68245-formula322"><label>. (9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>One can easily show that this comes from the extra work done by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> when it is applied on the charged particle as compared to when it is applied on the uncharged one in the time interval 0 to t.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Possible Means to Experimentally Detect Pre-Acceleration</title><p>In this section we study only the dynamics of charged particles so the restriction on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to be of non electromagnetic origin may be relaxed. The initial condition is changed from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to some finite velocity. Let us for example take the initial velocity to be the same as that of the final velocity attained by the particle in the last section that is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This becomes the new value of the constant K in Equation (6). Now we use the energy conservation equation given by Gron (see Equation (2.1) of ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68245-ref1">1</xref>] ) in the non relativistic limit</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68245-formula323"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the non relativistic limit <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the Schott force and for the one dimensional problem of Section 2 and the initial condition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for the time <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68245-formula324"><label>. (11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From these and using the values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and v from Equations (5) and (6) we get the value of the change in</p><p>kinetic energy from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to zero to be</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68245-formula325"><label>. (12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since this change in kinetic energy of the particle beam before <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is almost equal to the magnitude of the radiated energy in the interval <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> that is during the interval when a constant force is applied (compare Equations (9) and (12)), it must be experimentally detectable. This can be done by spectral methods to detect the shift in kinetic energy of the electrons (particles) in the beam when measured at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as compared to the value much before this time. In fact it will confirm or disprove the Lorentz, Abraham and Dirac theory of radiation reaction and the pre acceleration associated with it.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Theoretical Attempts to Cancel Pre-Acceleration in the Lorentz Theory of Radiation Reaction</title><p>Yaghjian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68245-ref2">2</xref>] had tried to modify the existing equation of motion of the Lorentz theory of radiation reaction in a way such that pre-acceleration is excluded. He writes (see Equation (8.34) of Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68245-ref2">2</xref>] ) in place of Equation (1) of the present paper the following equation of motion expressed as per the notations used in this paper</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68245-formula326"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This will first of all violate energy conservation as expressed by Equation (10) and there is no simple way to get around this difficulty if other aspects of Lorentz theory are to be kept intact after<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Also the solution given for this equation of motion which is stated as</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>has some features which makes it behave differently from the expression for acceleration as given by Equation (2) near<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This is because the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the expression above rapidly falls towards zero as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68245x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> causing some sort of “overshoot” if the force is of the form given by Equation (3) and may have some experimentally observed consequences especially when t (please refer to the previous sections) is small.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Rajat Roy, (2016) Some Studies on the Lorentz Theory of Radiation Reaction in Relation to a Charged Particle Acted on by a Constant Force in a Finite Time Interval. Open Access Library Journal,03,1-4. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1102334</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68245-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gron, O. (2012) Electrodynamics of Radiating Charges. Advances in Mathematical Physics, 2012, Article ID: 528631.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/528631</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68245-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yaghjian, A.D. (1992) Relativistic Dynamics of a Charged Sphere. Springer-Verlag, New York.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>