<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJNST</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-6795</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wjnst.2016.63014</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJNST-68111</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Modeling Operational Parameters for Uranium Dioxide Production Reactor through Uranium Trioxide Reaction Using Hydrogen
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pedro</surname><given-names>Orrego</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>José</surname><given-names>Hernández</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jorge</surname><given-names>Manríquez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Ingeniería Civil Metalurgia, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Sección de Geología y Minería, Departamento de Materiales Nucleares, Comisión Chilena de Energía Nuclear, Santiago, Chile</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>07</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>131</fpage><lpage>139</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>6</month>	<year>July</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This article shows the modeling of a uranium dioxide production reactor using COMSOL Multiphysics software program in its 4.3b version. The model was made using 3 kinds of studies: momentum, heat and mass transport, in order to determine the influence of the most important op
  erational parameters: UO<sub>3</sub> reaction rate, composition and flow of the reduction gas, the initial temperature reactor and the reducing gas. The operational parameters evaluated were the followings: constant gas flow of2.5 L/min, initial hydrogen concentration of 0.25, 0.50 and0.75 M, and initial temperature of 400
  &#176;C. The obtained results allow to conclude that under these working conditions, uranium dioxide is obtained virtually instantaneous and, with concentrations close to 0.5 M H
  <sub>2</sub> in the reducing gas, the process can operate continuously and autogenously, without applying additional energy and temperatures around 600
  &#176;C.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Uranium Trioxide</kwd><kwd> Uranium Dioxide</kwd><kwd> Conversion</kwd><kwd> Modeling</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Nuclear energy is a source of major electricity production, due to the high-energy capacity of the uranium fuel element during nuclear fission. Uranium is used mainly in the form of UO<sub>2</sub> type compounds. For this purpose, it must be enriched in its U<sup>235</sup> isotope to fulfill this purpose. The needed enrichment level will depend on the type of reactor used, and there are 2 types: Light Water Reactors (LWR), which require an enrichment of U<sup>235</sup> minimum between 3 and 5% to operate, and Pressurized Heavy Water Reactor (PHWR), which uses natural uranium as fuel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the uranium conversion for the production of UF<sub>6</sub>, raw material for the enrichment process.</p><p>This process reduces the uranium compound, either from UO<sub>3</sub> or from U<sub>3</sub>O<sub>8</sub>, and obtains UO<sub>2</sub> powders, according to the overall reaction:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula1"><label>. (1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Subsequently, UO<sub>2</sub> powder should be treated by hydrofluorination to obtain UF<sub>4</sub> powders:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula2"><label>. (2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Finally, the UF<sub>4</sub> compound is taken to the fluorination process to obtain UF<sub>6</sub>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula3"><label>. (3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The UF<sub>6</sub> compound, gaseous at 56˚C and atmospheric pressure, is carried to the enrichment process, in order to obtain a concentrated and a diluted fraction in U<sup>235</sup> through centrifugal force reactors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref3">3</xref>] , using the different weights of this and the U<sup>238</sup> isotope. This process is shown schematically in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>The gaseous compound UF<sub>6</sub>, once enriched, must return to its UO<sub>2</sub> form. To do this, there are 3 methods to carry out this task [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>H<sub>2</sub> reduction: The UF<sub>6(g)</sub> compound is reduced using hydrogen according to the reactions:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula4"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula5"><label>. (5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hydrolyzing: The UF<sub>6(g)</sub> compound is hydrolyzed using water:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula6"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula7"><label>. (7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Subsequently, the ammonium diuranate is reduced using H<sub>2</sub> at temperatures of 600˚C - 800˚C:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula8"><label>. (8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Finally, the third method for enriched UO<sub>2</sub> production is through precipitation of ammonium uranyl carbonate instead of ammonium diuranate, according to reaction (10):</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Uranium conversion process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref3">3</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x14.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The process leading to obtain UO<sub>2</sub> fuel elements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref6">6</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x15.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula9"><label>. (10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>All these processes require the use of a fluidized bed reactor for producing UO<sub>2</sub> for both UF<sub>6</sub> production, intended for further uranium enrichment, as for reproduction as UO<sub>2</sub> fuel pellets for nuclear power reactors.</p><p>It is for these reasons that this work will evaluate the main operating parameters of a fluidized bed reactor for UO<sub>2</sub> production from UO<sub>3</sub> concentrates using mathematical modeling techniques and the COMSOL Multiphysics software, in its 4.3b version. These parameters are the followings: feed flow, hydrogen concentration and initial temperature.</p><p>Conventional UO<sub>3</sub> to UO<sub>2</sub> reduction reactor is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>UO<sub>2</sub> production is conventionally performed in a reduction reactor as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. Here, uranium trioxide and hydrogen are continuously fed, H<sub>2</sub> is normally diluted in an inert gas such as argon or nitrogen. It is also common to use ammonia, which is cracked [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref11">11</xref>] to obtain a nitrogen and hydrogen gas mixture. This UO<sub>2</sub> production reactor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref13">13</xref>] is controlled by the following operational parameters: composition and flow of the reducing gas, UO<sub>3</sub> feed and internal reactor temperature.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Theoretical Basis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref14">14</xref>]</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Momentum Transport</title><p>Momentum transport is given by the Navier-Stokes equation, for compressible fluids:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula10"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula11"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where: ρ: density, u: H<sub>2</sub> flow velocity, I: identity matrix, F: External forces.</p><p>Momentum transport will determine the gas behavior inside the reduction reactor, for laminar regime.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Heat Transport</title><p>Heat transport is determined by the following equations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula12"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Conventional UO<sub>2</sub> production reactor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref10">10</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x20.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula13"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where ρ: reduction gas density, C<sub>p</sub>: specific heat, u: H<sub>2</sub> flow velocity, T: temperature, k: conduction coefficient, Q: source term, t: time, v: volume.</p><p>Solving this equation in the model will determine the temperature inside the UO<sub>3</sub> reduction reactor and the generated heat by the exothermic reaction between the UO<sub>3</sub> concentrate and the H<sub>2</sub> reducing gas.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Transport of Diluted Species</title><p>Mass transport for dilute species is determined by the equation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula14"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where D: Hydrogen diffusion coefficient, C: Hydrogen concentration in the reduction gas, u: Gas velocity flow, R: Hydrogen consumption rate in the reaction zone.</p><p>This equation will determine the concentration profile of hydrogen and/or water displayed by the system in continuous operation type.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Reactor Modeling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref15">15</xref>]</title><p>The reactor used in the development of experiences is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>This reactor is a tubular type, with input and output in conical shape. Its length is 1.66 m . and it has an internal diameter of 4.5 cm . The development of the experiences was performed by setting as parameters the initial temperature of both the gas and the reactor, which was between 400˚C - 500˚C and initial hydrogen concentrations in the reducing gas: 0.25, 0.5 and 0.75 M . The flow feeding the reduction reactor was kept constant at 2.5 L/min. The input speed of this flow was 0.1 m /s, and the cross section of 1.5 cm, so the feed flow regime was laminar.</p><p>To develop this model, the 3 transport phenomena mentioned before were occupied: momentum, heat and mass for dilute species. Working conditions are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>:</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows the considered parameters for the modeling: In the case of momentum transport, the reducing gas has inlet and outlet inside the reactor, and there is no slip flow on the walls. For heat transport, it is considered that the initial temperature for uranium conversion processes is 700 K. The walls symbolize heat losses by natural convection, where this system was covered by a thermal jacket at 450 K. The remaining heat will be generated by the exothermic reaction inside the vessel between UO<sub>3</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>. Finally, for the transport of diluted species, reducing gas flow has the aforementioned initial hydrogen concentrations. A fraction of this gas is consumed by the UO<sub>3</sub> vessel. The remaining hydrogen at the reactor outlet was burned to prevent gas leakage. In</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> UO<sub>2</sub> conversion reactor</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x23.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Working conditions for UO<sub>2</sub> production</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x24.png"/></fig><p>order to simplify the development of the calculations, the model was proposed using as axial symmetry, in the bottom of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p><p>The equations used to the model development were obtained from previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref15">15</xref>] . In this work, the reduction kinetics of uranium trioxide was developed based on the formation of an intermediate compound, U<sub>3</sub>O<sub>8</sub>, according to the following reactions:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula15"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula16"><label>. (17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The reduction rates for both equations were determined by using Arrhenius’s Law, according to Equation (18):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula17"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>: UO<sub>3</sub> reaction rate, cH<sub>2</sub>: hydrogen concentration in the reducing gas, n: reaction order for hydrogen concentration, R: universal gas constant, T: absolute temperature, E<sub>a</sub>: activation energy.</p><p>The corresponding reaction rates for Equations (17) and (18) are, respectively:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula18"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68111-formula19"><label>. (20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to other authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref16">16</xref>] , the conversion process is usually made from U<sub>3</sub>O<sub>8</sub> compounds, as the uranium oxide with greater chemical stability. This implies that reaction (19) occurs uneventfully. Moreover, reaction rate (20) involves the formation of other intermediate oxides of uranium, such as U<sub>3</sub>O<sub>7</sub> or U<sub>4</sub>O<sub>9</sub>, which, as already discussed in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref16">16</xref>] , decrease the overall speed of the process at temperatures above 700˚C. For this reason, reaction kinetics (21), which is the controlling step, will be used for modeling the reduction reactor.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><p>The obtained results were as follows:</p><p>According to Equations (12) and (13), it can be said that the progress of these reactions is quantified through water production. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows the UO<sub>3</sub> reduction kinetics is so fast at these temperatures, almost no hydrogen exists in the vicinity of the vessel, where the reaction occurs. The following figure shows the linear profiles generating water into the reactor, along the axial symmetry.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> shows that, for all hydrogen concentrations in the reducing gas, they are consumed almost entirely in the UO<sub>3</sub> vessel.</p><p>However, the most important parameter for the development of experiences is the temperature profile along the reactor, and the exothermic peak reached by the system due to the release of reaction heat, as this defines the capacity of the system to work autonomously, without the need of additional energy. This profile is determined by the release of energy from the exothermic reaction between uranium oxides and hydrogen. The profiles obtained for the hydrogen concentrations in the reducing gas, are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>.</p><p>According to bibliographic data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68111-ref15">15</xref>] , the ideal temperature for the development of these experiences is 500˚C - 600˚C. The objective of this result is to check whether the process can operate autonomously, keeping the temperature within this range. For this reason, the process must be performed at 0.5 M H<sub>2</sub> concentrations to ensure this stationarity condition.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Validation of Results</title><p>The results of the experiments carried out in this reactor are shown in the following figure:</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> shows that UO<sub>3</sub> reaction kinetics is virtually instantaneous in contact with the reducing H<sub>2</sub> gas, since for temperatures of 500˚C and 600˚C, the transformed fraction of UO<sub>3</sub> to UO<sub>2</sub> it is above 90%.</p><p>In the case of temperature, the experimental exothermic peaks obtained are compared with the modeling system.</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Volumetric concentration profile of water inside the reduction reactor</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x31.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Water profile concentrations inside the reduction reactor</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x32.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Temperature profile for the UO<sub>3</sub> reduction reactor</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x33.png"/></fig><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Reaction kinetics for uranium concentrates, at constant temperature</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090298x34.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between exothermic peaks</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Initial T˚ (K)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >[H<sub>2</sub>] (Mol/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Exothermal peak (K) (experimental)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Exothermal peak (K) (model)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Relative error (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >700</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >725</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >700</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >805</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >860</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >700</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >890</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows that the temperature system, operating continuously, can be predicted in an acceptable way using mathematical modeling techniques, since the data obtained for the proposed working conditions show relative errors of less than 10%.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>・ From the previous data of UO<sub>2</sub> production, it is possible to predict the reduction of UO<sub>3</sub> compounds with hydrogen using mathematical modeling techniques.</p><p>・ The fluidized bed reactors can be monitored effectively with the gaseous products, which means that it is not necessary to manipulate the UO<sub>3</sub> vessel. This fact allows the safety during the data collection.</p><p>・ For the studied kinetic parameters, the UO<sub>3</sub> reduction reactions occur almost instantly, as the results show a hydrogen conversion to water almost completely.</p><p>・ The condition that allows continuous operation for the reduction reactor is feeding with reducing gas at 0.5M H<sub>2</sub>.</p><p>・ The temperature profiles and relative errors allowed to conclude that the reduction of U<sub>3</sub>O<sub>8</sub> compounds to UO<sub>2</sub> provided the required energy to maintain the working temperature in the required ranges.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission acknowledges the assistance provided by University of Santiago, Chile, in the use and license of computer software COMSOL Multiphysics v4.3b, “CFD Module User’s Guide”, Modeling Single Phase Flow, Page 27-144. License Number: 2079130, Host ID: 5c260a04780b, 1.998-2.103.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Pedro Orrego,Jos&#233; Hern&#225;ndez,Jorge Manr&#237;quez, (2016) Modeling Operational Parameters for Uranium Dioxide Production Reactor through Uranium Trioxide Reaction Using Hydrogen. World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology,06,131-139. doi: 10.4236/wjnst.2016.63014</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68111-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/nuclear-power-reactors.aspx</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">http://www.areva.com/EN/operations-757/conversion-the-fluorination-of-uranium-in-2-stages.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(1999) Minimization of Waste from Uranium Purification, Enrichment and Fuel Fabrication. IAEA-TECDOC-1115, IAEA, Vienna.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">https://geoinfo.nmt.edu/resources/uranium/enrichment.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">http://web.ead.anl.gov/uranium/guide/depletedu/enrich/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johnson, T. (2010) Uranium Mining, Milling, Enrichment and Fuel Fabrication in the United States. Colorado State University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cardelli, F. (2000) Materials Handbook: A Concise Desktop Reference. Springer Verlag, London. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3648-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nuclear Fuel Cycle, Information System. A Directory of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities, 2009 Edition.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cameron, I. (2007) Nuclear Fission Reactors. Plenium Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">LinkenIN Slide Share (2013) Introduction to Fluidized Beds. Chemical Reaction Engineering Laboratory, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Washington University, St. Louis.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(1986) Advances in Uranium Refining and Conversion. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sidorov, E.V. and Sofronov, V.L. (2011) Investigation of the Kinetics of U3O8 Reduction by Hydrogen and Ammonia under Non-Isothermal Conditions.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harrington, Ch. and Ruehle, A. (1959) Uranium Production Technology. Mallinckrodt Chemical Works, St. Louis, Missouri.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gaskell, D. (1990) An Introduction to Transport Phenomena in Materials Engineering. 2nd Edition, Momentum Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alfaro, P.O., Torres, J.H. and Thiele, F.P. (2015) Reduction Kinetics of Uranium Trioxide to Uranium Dioxide Using Hydrogen. World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 5, 149-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/wjnst.2015.53015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68111-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Razdan, M. (2013) Electrochemical and Surface Compositional Studies on Uranium Dioxide. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation, Repository, Paper 1740.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>