<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1101314</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-68049</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Relation between the Pressure Gradient of General Relativity and Its Newtonian Counterpart with Respect to Certain Stellar Models
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rajat</surname><given-names>Roy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, 
Kharagpur, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rajatroy@ece.iitkgp.ernet.in</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>02</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>3</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>1</month>	<year>February</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   
   The non-uniqueness of the relation between the pressure gradients of general relativity and its Newtonian counterpart is demonstrated. This may lead to a non-unique relation between the two force laws. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pressure Gradient</kwd><kwd> General Relativity</kwd><kwd> Newtonian Gravity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>It is a well-known fact in Newtonian gravitation that the gravitational force and pressure gradient are proportional to each other in a fluid. In general relativity, on the other hand, the concept of “gravitational force” has to be properly defined before we can relate it with the general relativistic pressure gradient. In the present study, we bypass this tricky question of “general relativistic gravitational force” and try to relate the pressure gradient of Newtonian gravity with that of general relativity for different stellar models. To our surprise, we find that the relation between the general relativistic pressure gradient and its Newtonian counterpart is not unique and is very much model dependent. One of the consequences of this is that it can lead to a non-unique relation between the Newtonian force law and its general relativistic counterpart. The units used are those in which the constant of gravitation G = 1 and the speed of light c = 1.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Expressions for the Pressure Gradients in General Relativity and in Newtonian Gravity for a Class of Stellar Models</title><p>Here we restrict ourselves to a narrow class of stellar models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68049-ref1">1</xref>] for which the density <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (a function of r the radial coordinate) is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68049-formula121"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The number n determines the density of the stellar material for a specified radius r = a of the star. The mass of the star m is related to these two quantities n and a by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68049-formula122"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The pressure <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68049-formula123"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>from which after differentiation with respect to r we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68049-formula124"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This is the general relativistic expression for pressure gradient. The Newtonian pressure gradient is obtained by invoking the concept of equilibrium (hydrostatic) in Newtonian physics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68049-ref2">2</xref>] (see equation numbers (1) and (4)</p><p>of chapter 3 of this reference) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> from which we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68049-formula125"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Calculation of the Pressure Gradients for Models Having Different n but with the Almost Same Value of Mass m</title><p>The radius a of the stellar model is given by Equation (2) for the chosen values of m and n. We take for the first case <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> km which roughly corresponds to m of the Sun. We keep the Newto-</p><p>nian value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> same for all cases and the values of r corresponding to the different n values are shown in column 3 of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The general relativistic values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are shown in the last column of this table.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The general relativistic pressure gradients for the same value of its Newtonian counterpart</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a (km)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >r (km)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(Newtonian)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68049x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(GR)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.122 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >696 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.692144 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>28</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.692161 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>28</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.244 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >348 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7461361 &#215; 10<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-do-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.692176 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>28</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.061 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1392 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.929578 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-do-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.692152 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>28</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Thus without a rigorous proof, one can make an important conjecture: The deviation of force law in general relativity from its Newtonian counterpart is dependent not only on the strength of the force but also on other parameters which may be dependent on or independent of it but strictly dependent on the model. This in our opinion will cause serious difficulties in defining the Newtonian limit of general relativity.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Referencess</title><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68049-ref1">1</xref>] Durgapal, M.C. and Gehlot, G.L. (1968) Exact Internal Solutions for Dense Massive Stars. Physical Review, 172, 1308-1309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.172.1308</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68049-ref2">2</xref>] Chandrasekhar, S. (1958) An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structure. Dover Publications Inc., Mineola.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68049-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Durgapal, M.C. and Gehlot, G.L. (1968) Exact Internal Solutions for Dense Massive Stars. Physical Review, 172, 1308-1309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.172.1308</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68049-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chandrasekhar, S. (1958) An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structure. Dover Publications Inc., Mineola.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>