<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1101247</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-68000</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Employing 532 nm Wavelength in a Laser Ultrasound Interferometer Based on Photorefractive Polymer Composites
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Saeid</surname><given-names>Zamiri</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bernhard</surname><given-names>Reitinger</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mario-Alejandro</surname><given-names>Rodríguez-Rivera</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gabriel</surname><given-names>Ramos-Ortíz</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Peter</surname><given-names>Burgholzer</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Siegfried</surname><given-names>Bauer</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>José-Luis</surname><given-names>Maldonado</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Centro de Investigaciones en óptica A.C., León, México</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Christian Doppler Laboratory for Photo Acoustic Imaging and Laser Ultrasonics, Linz, Austria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Research Center for Non Destructive Testing GmbH (RECENDT), Linz, Austria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Soft Matter Physics, Johannes Kepler Universit&amp;amp;#228;t, Linz, Austria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>saeid.zamiri@recendt.at(SZ)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>01</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>8</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>19</month>	<year>January</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Laser ultrasonic (LUS) receivers based on photorefractive (PR) materials are contactless and adaptive interferometers, which are used widely for materials characterization. Here, we present a simple LUS interferometer at 532 nm operating wavelength based on organic PR polymer composites (PVK/ECZ/C<sub>60</sub>) doped with the nonlinear chromophore 4-[4-(diethylamino)-2-hydroxyben-zylideneamino] benzonitrile (Dc). A picoseconds laser at 1064 nm wavelength is used to generate ultrasound pulses in aluminum plates and by using this LUS polymer interferometer, detection of these ultrasound waves is remotely performed at the surface of the specimens. The LUS sensor is used to determine the thickness of aluminum plates about 0.25 mm, 3 mm and 10 mm. We also show the potential of this polymer receiver for detection of an artificial defect in a metal sample. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Laser Ultrasonic</kwd><kwd> Photorefractive (PR) Materials</kwd><kwd> Polymer Composites</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Laser ultrasound (LUS) is a remote and contactless measurement technique for materials inspection and characterization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref3">3</xref>] . In LUS method, a short pulse laser beam is focused on the sample surface to generate ultrasonic waves in all directions on the surface and inside the sample, which can be remotely detected either at the front or opposite surface of the specimen by means of LUS interferometers. This method has many advantages over conventional techniques based on contact and noncontact piezoelectrics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref1">1</xref>] . For laser based detection of ultrasonic waves, several different interferometers such as confocal Fabry-Perot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref1">1</xref>] , Michelson [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref1">1</xref>] , long path difference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref1">1</xref>] and photorefractive (PR) interferometers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref4">4</xref>] , with different frequency responses and sensitivities are used but most of them are applicable just for samples with high reflective surfaces [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref4">4</xref>] . For samples with rough surfaces, LUS receivers based on two-wave mixing (TWM) in an adaptive PR material exhibit high sensitivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>For a decade, many photorefractive materials have been used as beam combiners in PR interferometers, however, with different sensitivities, coupling gains and response times [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref6">6</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref11">11</xref>] . Among them, PR polymer composites are very promising because of their low-cost, easy preparation and, further, they can be employed for a wide range of wavelengths [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref12">12</xref>] . The essential diversity between PR crystals and polymers comes from the dielectric constant, which is lower in polymers than in PR crystals and thus, electrical charge generation, transportation and trapping is highly field dependent in most of PR organic polymers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref11">11</xref>] . The main advantage of these organic composites is their higher PR coupling gain (~10 - 400 cm<sup>−1</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref11">11</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref14">14</xref>] in comparison to that of the PR crystals (&lt;40 cm<sup>−1</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref6">6</xref>] , which is an important parameter to be used in LUS interferometers.</p><p>In this work, we report on a new LUS homodyne receiver [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref11">11</xref>] , at 532 nm operating wavelength using organic PR composites (To the best of our knowledge, this is for the first time), based on the nonlinear chromophore 4-[4-(diethylamino)-2-hydroxybenzylideneamino] benzonitrile (Dc), fullerene C<sub>60</sub> as sensitizer, poly (N- vinylcarbazole) (PVK) as hole transporting polymer, and ECZ as plasticizer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref15">15</xref>] . We show that this polymer based LUS interferometer is highly suitable for the remote measurement of the thickness of metal sheets and detection of a subsurface defect position. From these points of view, new operating wavelength at 532 nm for a new PR polymer composite and remotely detection of ultrasonic waves by using this LUS polymer are new techniques in this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. LUS Experimental Setup</title><p>The organic PR polymer samples, Dc:PVK:ECZ:C<sub>60</sub> (25:49:25:1 wt%) were synthesized and tested, according to the reported procedure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref15">15</xref>] . Thickness of the PR samples was about 110 mm. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the absorption spectrum of these PR compounds. As it can be seen, the absorption maximum is at the wavelength of 406 nm and in the range of 500 nm to 800 nm these polymers exhibit relatively low absorption. The absorption coefficient of PR polymer sample at the operation wavelength of 532 nm was measured 22 cm<sup>−1</sup>. A photograph of the respective PR polymer is shown as the inset photo.</p><p>The experimental setup of the LUS receiver is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. A cw Nd:YAG Klastech laser with a power of 300 mW and 532 nm wavelength was used for detection of the generated ultrasonic pulses on the test samples surface. An optical density filter was used to attenuate the out power of this detection laser to 20 mW.</p><p>The p_polarized reference beam (RB) with 10 mW power and spot size of 1 mm by means of mirrors and a lens is directed to the polymer sample. The circular polarized signal beam (SB) is reflected from the rough surface of the samples and collected by lenses. After second passing through QWP by means of the lenses, the polarization gets linear. Finally, the phase modulated signal beam (due to generated ultrasonic vibrations) is focused with power of about 1 mW and a spot size of 1 mm to the PR polymer sample and interfere with the reference beam with an angle of 30˚ between them, the tilted angle of the sample with respect to the normal vector was about 60˚ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref16">16</xref>] . The half wave plate and polarizing beam splitter was used to adjust the intensity ratio between reference and signal beam. An external high voltage up to 5 kV was applied to the PR sample, corresponding to an applied field of 45 V/&#181;m. Due to the modulated refractive index, a grating is created in the PR sample, and the two beams couple and diffract in the direction of the other beam.</p><p>For detection of the interference between the reference and signal beam, the diffracted beam was focused on a fast and broadband Si-photo detector (New Port 1801-FS). An infrared filter was used to attenuate the effect of picoseconds laser light on the photo-detector. For generation of ultrasonic pulses in the metallic samples (can be applicable for nonmetallic samples), a Q-switch Nd:YAG laser (Ekslpa, 1064 nm wavelength) and pulse width of 20 picoseconds at 10 Hz repetition rate and with tunable energy from 1 to 80 mJ was used. The generated pulses were focused on the plate’s backside in a spot size of about 0.2 mm by using a lens and the detection of ultrasonic pulses was performed on the samples front side.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Absorption coefficient of Dc:PVK: ECZ:C<sub>60</sub> PR film at 25:49:25:1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref15">15</xref>] , photograph of the respective PR polymer composites sample</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68000x5.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Schematic diagram of the experimental laser ultra- sonic receiver based on the PR polymer. HWP: half wave plate for 532 nm; QWP: quarter wave plate; PBS: polarizer beam split- ter; M: mirror; L: lens; SB and RB: signal and reference beam; HV: high voltage power supply; F: filter</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68000x6.png"/></fig><p>For detection of the interference between the reference and signal beam, the diffracted beam was focused on a fast and broadband Si-photo detector (New Port 1801-FS). An Infrared filter was used to attenuate the effect of picoseconds laser light on the photo-detector. For generation of ultrasonic pulses in the metal samples, a Q- switch Nd:YAG laser (Ekslpa, 1064 nm wavelength) and pulse width of 20 picoseconds at 10 Hz repetition rate and with tunable energy from 1 to 80 mJ was used. The generation pulses were focused on the plate’s backside in a spot size of about 0.2 mm by using a lens and the detection of ultrasonic pulses was performed on the samples front side.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and discussion</title><p>As a first application of our LUS receiver for the remote thickness measurement of metal sheets, the LUS measurements were carried out on aluminum plates with different thicknesses of 0.25 mm, 3 mm and 10 mm. Ps pulses from the generation laser with energy of 1 mJ to 20 mJ (depending on the sample thickness) were focused on the plates and the generated longitudinal waves were detected.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, the detected longitudinal echoes for two samples (10 mm and 3 mm thick) are shown. As it can</p><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Detected longitudinal echoes using LUS detector based on PR polymers for (a) 10 mm, (b) 3 mm and (c) a typical LUS measurement for one point on 10 mm thick sample.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68000x7.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label>(c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68000x8.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>be seen, the time of flight of the echoes is periodic, thus by knowing the ultrasound velocity in aluminum (6400 m/s) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref1">1</xref>] one can calculate the sample thickness. The real and estimated thicknesses are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, which are in good agreement.</p><p>To the best of our knowledge, this is for the first time that the wavelength of 532 nm is employed in a LUS PR polymer for detection ultrasonic waves. M. Klein and coworkers also showed a polymer ultrasonic detector but at 676 nm wavelength [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref11">11</xref>] . They generated the ultrasonic pulses by using a 5 MHz contact piezoelectric transducer bonded to a quartz mirror as a sample and used their LUS polymer composite setup for detection. In our previous work, we used a He-Ne laser of 632 nm wavelength in a LUS polymer setup for detection of laser generated ultrasonic pulses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>From these points of view, new operating wavelength at 532 nm for a new PR polymer composite and remotely generation and detection of ultrasonic pulses both by lasers are new methods in the present work.</p><p>Additionally, to further demonstrate the capability of our LUS receiver, detection of the position of a subsurface defect was also investigated. An artificial hole of 1 mm diameter and depth of about 2 mm as subsurface flaw on a 3 mm thick aluminum plate was created. By focusing the pulsed laser (1064 nm) with energy of 10 mJ and spot size 0.2 mm on the opposite side of the plate and scanning 5 mm length of the sample using a programmable stage, the reflected longitudinal echoes from the forward side and thus, the artificial defect were detected. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a), a simple scheme of linear surface scanning of the sample for defect detection by generation of ultrasound pulses is displayed. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b), the defect profile and its position are shown. By using the time of flight of the echoes from the imperfection shape (~275 ns to 300 ns), a defect depth from the forwards surface of 1.76 mm to 1.9 mm was determined.</p><p>X. Wang and coworkers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref17">17</xref>] used a complicated setup to generate and detect the ultrasound pulses in an aluminum plate with a mirror like surface and their application to sense an artificial defect in the sample. They used a mask to shaped the beam profile of a Q-switched Ti:Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> laser with 800 nm wavelength and 50 ns pulse width and, the generated bulk ultrasound waves were detected by placing a piezoelectric transducer on the sample</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Real thickness and LUS estimated value of the aluminum sheets</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Real Thickness (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >10</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LUS Estimation (mm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Simple scheme of generation and detection of ultrasonic pulses in a 3 mm thick aluminum sheet for subsurface defect detection; (b) detected longitudinal echoes from an artificial defect on the 3 mm thick aluminum plate.</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68000x10.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68000x9.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>backside. They changed the laser output profile to a ring shape for focusing and amplifying the ultrasound wave in the sample to detect the flaw in the thermo-elastic regime.</p><p>In a previous work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68000-ref18">18</xref>] , we reported on a fully contactless method to focus laser generated bulk and surface ultrasound waves in the thermo-elastic coupling mode by annular shaped illumination. We used a spatial light modulator (SLM) and changed the beam profile of a pulsed picoseconds laser to ring forms and then they were used to focus acoustic waves toward the center in an aluminum sheet. For detection, a fast BSO crystal was used in a two-wave mixing LUS setup and the application of this technique in subsurface defects detection as well as sample thickness measurement were investigated, however, this method was complicated and difficult to use in industrial applications.</p><p>From this point of view, the present LUS polymer set up in this paper has some advantages; it is easy to fabricate, cheap and contactless LUS setup, by which we were able to detect the subsurface defect for a sample with a high rough surface.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>We presented a simple LUS receiver based on Dc:PVK:ECZ:C<sub>60</sub> PR polymer composites and employing 532 nm detection wavelength. This receiver was utilized successfully to detect ultrasonic displacements on aluminum plates with thicknesses of 10 mm, 3 mm and 0.25 mm. By measuring the time of flight of the detected longitudinal waves in the samples, thicknesses were estimated. The LUS polymer detector was applied to detect a hole as a subsurface defect. By scanning the sample surface, the defect position and its profile were measured. In this work, the LUS measurements showed the large potential of organic PR polymer based ultrasonic receivers for non-contact and nondestructive testing investigations on materials.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work has been supported by the Christian Doppler Research Association, the K-Project for Non-Destruc- tive Testing and Tomography supported by the COMET-Program of the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG), Grant No. 820492, the European Regional Development Fund (EFRE) in the framework of the EU-pro- gram Regio 13, and by CONACyT projects in Mexico.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Saeid Zamiri,Bernhard Reitinger,Mario-Alejandro Rodr&#237;guez-Rivera,Gabriel Ramos-Ort&#237;z,Peter Burgholzer,Siegfried Bauer,Jos&#233;-Luis Maldonado, (2015) Employing 532 nm Wavelength in a Laser Ultrasound Interferometer Based on Photorefractive Polymer Composites. Open Access Library Journal,02,1-8. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1101247</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68000-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zamiri, S., et al. (2014) Converging Laser Generated Ultrasonic Waves Using Annular Patterns Irradiation. IOP Journal, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 520, Article ID: 012001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, X., et al. (1996) Focused Bulk Ultrasonic Waves Generated by Ring-Shaped Laser Illumination and Application to Flaw Detection. Journal of Applied Physics, 80, 4274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.363387</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zamiri, S., et al. (2014) Laser Ultrasonic Receivers Based on Organic Photorefractive Polymer Composites. Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics, 114, 509-515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00340-013-5554-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Herrera-Ambriz, V., et al. (2011) Highly Efficient Photorefractive Organic Polymers Based on Benzonitrile Shiff Bases Nonlinear Chromophores. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 115, 23955-23963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp206204p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maldonado, J.L., et al. (2009) High Diffraction Efficiency at Low Electric Field in Photorefractive Polymers Doped with Arylimine Chromophores. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 42, Article ID: 075102.http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/7/075102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ostroverkhova, O., et al. (2004) Organic Photorefractive: Mechanisms, Materials, and Applications. Chemical Reviews, 104, 3267-3314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr960055c</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K&amp;#246;ber, S., et al. (2011) Organic Photorefractive Materials and Applications. Advanced Materials, 23, 4725-4763.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adma.201100436</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Klein, M.B., et al. (1999) Homodyne Detection of Ultrasonic Surface Displacements Using Two-Wave Mixing in Photorefractive Polymers. Optics Communications, 162, 79-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4018(99)00023-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blouin, A., et al. (1994) Detection of Ultrasonic Motion of a Scattering Surface by Two-Wave Mixing in a Photorefractive GaAs Crystal. Applied Physics Letters, 65, 932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.112153</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garcia, P.M., et al. (1995) Self-Stabilized Holographic Recording in LiNbOs:Fe Crystals. Optics Communications, 117, 235-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(95)00157-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pouet, B.F., et al. (1996) Heterodyne Interferometer with Two-Wave Mixing in Photorefractive Crystals for Ultrasound Detection on Rough Surfaces. Applied Physics Letters, 69, 3782.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ivleva, L.I., et al. (2003) Two- and Four-Wave Mixing in SBN:Ni Crystals. Laser Physics, 13, 251.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Günter, P. and Huignard, J.P. (2007) Photorefractive Material and Their Applications. Springer Series in Optical Sciences, 115, 5-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tuovinen, H., et al. (1998) Directionally Sensitive Photorefractive Interferometric Line Receiver for Ultrasound Detection on Rough Surfaces. Applied Physics Letters, 73, 2236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.121687</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Honda, T., et al. (1995) Optical Measurement of Ultrasonic Nanometer Motion of Rough Surface by Two Wave Mixing in Bi12SiO20. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 34, 3737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.34.3737</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davies, S.J., et al. (1993) Laser-Generated Ultrasound: Its Properties, Mechanisms, and Multifarious Applications. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 26, 329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/26/3/001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Banet, M.J., et al. (1998) High Precision Film Thickness Determination Using a Laser-Based Ultrasonic Technique. Applied Physics Letters, 73, 169-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.121780</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68000-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scruby, C.B. and Drain, L.E. (1990) Laser Ultrasonics: Techniques and Applications. Adam Hilger, Bristol.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>