<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Health</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Health</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1949-4998</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/health.2016.89093</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">Health-67690</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  On Human Autonomic Nervous Activity Related to Weather Conditions Based on Big Data Measurement via Smartphone
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Makoto</surname><given-names>Komazawa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kenichi</surname><given-names>Itao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hiroyuki</surname><given-names>Kobayashi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhiwei</surname><given-names>Luo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Organization of Advanced Science and Technology Kobe University, Kobe, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>JUNTENDO University, Tokyo, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Graduate School of System Informatics, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>WINFrontier Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>makoto.komazawa@winfrontier.com(MK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>06</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>894</fpage><lpage>904</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>21</month>	<year>June</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This research uses our previously-developed smartphone camera-based heart rate change analysis system to survey the correlation between weather patterns and the autonomic nervous activity across a big data set of approximately 200,000 entries. The results showed a trend in which a significant decrease was seen in sympathetic nervous activity in both males and females—the higher the temperature. In addition, a significant increase was seen in the sympathetic nervous system in both males and females—the higher the atmospheric pressure. Lastly, a significant decrease was seen in the sympathetic nervous system in both males and females—the more precipitation there was. These results accord with prior research and with human biological phenomena, and we were able to use a data set of approximately 200,000 entries to statistically demonstrate our hypothesis. We believe this represents a valuable set of reference data for use in the health care.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Heart Rate Variability</kwd><kwd> Autonomic Nervous System</kwd><kwd> Large Amount of Measurement Data</kwd><kwd> Weather</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>It has long been recognized that modern society is stressful. If human beings are subjected to stress for a long period, the functions of autonomic nervous system and the endocrine system, which control the adrenocortical hormone, will be seriously influenced [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref1">1</xref>] . The autonomic nervous system controls the balance between the sympathetic nerve activity, which responses for maintaining the tension and excitement, and the parasympathetic nerve activity, which responses for maintaining relaxation. Therefore, it is very important for self-manage- ment to routinely recognize the state of our autonomic nervous system during everyday life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>The typical non-invasive technique for measuring autonomic nervous system uses a small, specialized heart rate sensor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref3">3</xref>] , or a fingertip pulse wave sensor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref4">4</xref>] . These devices are used to measure RR interval (heartbeat interval) and peak interval (a value corresponding to the RR interval that is detected from the pulse waveform) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref5">5</xref>] , whereupon heart rate variability analysis is performed to calculate sympathetic nervous and parasympathetic nervous activity indicators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref6">6</xref>] . These systems use Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref7">7</xref>] to calculate the autonomic nervous activity from RR interval data in one to five minutes.</p><p>However, all these products use extremely expensive, specialized sensors and systems to measure RR intervals and pulse wave peak intervals. Thus, the hurdles to their use by the general public are high. Because of this, measurement of autonomic nervous system conditions has been limited to specialized facilities such as hospitals.</p><p>During previous research, authors developed a simple and precise measurement system that does not rely on specialized devices, but utilizes the camera of smartphones sold on the general market [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref8">8</xref>] . In this system, the device camera is placed on the tip of the finger for a short amount of time (just over 30 seconds), where it detects the pulse waveform peak interval from luminance changes in blood flow. Then, heart rate variability analysis is performed to measure the detailed conditions of the autonomic nervous system, namely, its balance and amount of activity (total power).</p><p>This system is currently being put to use by approximately 1,000,000 users (as of March 2016) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref9">9</xref>] as an App for their iPhone (Apple Inc.) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref10">10</xref>] or Android device (Google Inc.) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Up to this point, autonomic nervous system measurements have been mainly conducted at hospitals, laboratories, and other facilities, using specialized sensors and equipment. Thus, the number of possible measurement subjects was limited to few hundred people at most. And as measurements were conducted under a particular set of circumstances, they cannot be considered an accurate representation of autonomic nervous system in daily life.</p><p>The system utilized in this study, however, is able to easily measure a large amount of data at any time, any location, and after any activity, giving researchers an understanding of autonomic nervous system conditions under everyday circumstances.</p><p>The authors used this system in previous research to investigate the relationship between autonomic nervous system and age and BMI, based on approximately 100,000 entries of autonomic nervous system data. This study found that the autonomic nervous activity decreases significantly as age and BMI increase [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref12">12</xref>] . The authors also published a study on the diurnal variation of autonomic nervous system, based on approximately 100,000 entries of autonomic nervous system data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref13">13</xref>] . The results of these studies are consistent with results obtained using specialized sensors and measurement equipment.</p><p>While there is a comparatively high volume of research [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref15">15</xref>] on the correlation between atmospheric temperature (one aspect of weather) and changes in the human body, there remains little research into other factors like atmospheric pressure and precipitation.</p><p>Studies on all of these factors have involved small samples sizes, so there was as yet no research that utilized a big data set of several hundreds of thousands of entries to analyze the relationship of weather to the autonomic nervous system.</p><p>This research uses an unprecedented set of approximately 200,000 entries of data on the autonomic nervous system and analyzes it according to the three parameters below.</p><p>・ The relationship between autonomic nervous system and atmospheric temperature</p><p>・ The relationship between autonomic nervous system and atmospheric pressure</p><p>・ The relationship between autonomic nervous system and precipitation</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>This study employed a heart rate variability analysis system utilizing the camera of smartphones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref8">8</xref>] . In this system, the smartphone camera is placed against the tip of the finger, where it continuously acquires data on the luminance of the skin. If the finger is lifted from the camera, the system displays a warning message. A pulse wave is derived from the changes in luminance, and the peak interval (corresponds to the RR interval) is detected from that pulse waveform. Then, frequency analysis is performed on peak interval fluctuations to calculate the autonomic nervous system indicator. This system is outlined in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>The frequency analysis conformed to the procedure described in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref6">6</xref>] , with the low frequency component (LF) calculated as 0.04 Hz - 0.15 Hz, and the high frequency component (HF) calculated as 0.15 Hz - 0.4 Hz.</p><p>LF/HF values are used as indicators of sympathetic nervous activity, as well as indicators of tension, stimulation, and stress [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>This paper analyzes the autonomic nervous system data of 53,800 subjects (17,474 males and 36,326 females). Measurement data was used with the consent of the subjects, in accordance with the ethics regulations of WIN Frontier Co., Ltd.</p><p>Subject age (in tens of years) and sex are displayed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. IBM SPSS Statics Version 22 was used for this study’s statistical processing. The significance level was set to 5%.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Relation between Autonomic Nervous System and Atmospheric Temperature</title><p>This research surveys the relationship of atmospheric pressure to autonomic nervous system. Data on atmospheric temperature averages was downloaded from the Japan Meteorological Agency’s website [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref16">16</xref>] and the date of measurements and data from each prefecture tied to measured values by city as grouped by ordinance-desig- nated city. The temperature intervals were grouped around days measuring 25 degrees Celsius, or what is called a “summer’s day” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref17">17</xref>] , with categories for days below 25 degrees and above 25 degrees, respectively. Data by</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> System outline</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-8203708x6.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Subject age (in tens of years) and sex</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Man</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Female</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10’s</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1890</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8223</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20’s</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2530</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8746</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11,276</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30<sup>’</sup>s</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4862</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7188</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40’s</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4584</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8723</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,307</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50’s</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4633</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6524</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11,157</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 60’s</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1511</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1138</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2649</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17,474</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36,326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53,800</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>temperature category is seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>It has been reported that treating LF/HF, an index of sympathetic nervous activity, as a logarithm normalizes data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref18">18</xref>] , so LF/HF for each data entry was converted to the LnLF/HF logarithm, and the difference in population mean between each was analyzed. Results for males are seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, and those for females in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>The results show a trend in which there is a significant drop in sympathetic nervous activity in both males and females the higher the temperature is (P value:</p><p>In general, it is understood that in cold weather, the effects of the sympathetic nervous system constrict the blood vessels and prevent the body from dispersing heat; in warm weather, the parasympathetic nervous system expands the blood vessels and causes the body to perspire, thereby decreasing body temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref19">19</xref>] . This research hypothesized that a similar biological phenomenon would be present in the autonomic nervous system and manifest similar heat- and cold-prevention mechanisms. We were able to utilize a large set of 200,000 entries of data to statistically demonstrate this.</p><p>We believe this represents an extremely useful set of reference data that can be used for adjusting day-to-day lifestyles to account for temperature increases, to control health, et cetera.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. The Relation between Autonomic Nervous System and Atmospheric Pressure</title><p>In this section, we examine the relationship between atmospheric pressure and the autonomic nervous system. Data on atmospheric pressure averages was downloaded from the Japan Meteorological Agency’s website [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref16">16</xref>] and the date of measurements and data from each prefecture tied to measured values by city as grouped by ordinance-designated city. The pressure intervals were grouped around readings of 1013 hPa for one unit of pressure,</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Data by temperature category</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Man</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Female</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Under 25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74,100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150,767</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224,867</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3818</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16,318</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77,918</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163,267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241,185</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="3"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> T-test results: atmospheric temperature and LnLF/HF (male)</title></caption><table-wrap id="3_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Group Statistics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature_flag</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Std Deviation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sid Error Mean</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >LnLF/HF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Under 25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74,100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5041853460</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9161316994</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003365494</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3818</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4466678728</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8858146424</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0143358977</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="3_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >LnLF/HF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equal variances assumed</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >7.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.006</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equal variances not assumed</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="3_3"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >t-test for Equality of Means</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >St &lt; J. Error</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >95% Confidence Interval of the Difference</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >t</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >df</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3lg. (2-talled)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Difference</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Difference</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.789</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77,916</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0575174732</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0151794567</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0277658320</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0872691143</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.906</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4248.655</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0575174732</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0147256413</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0286475221</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0863874242</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><table-wrap-group id="4"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> T-test results: atmospheric temperature and LnLF/HF (female)</title></caption><table-wrap id="4_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature_flag</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Error Mean</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LnLF/HF Under 25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150,767</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3745794716</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9287018287</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0023917906</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3520963961</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8932121169</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0079891320</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >LnLF/HF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equal variances assumed</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >25.065</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equal variances not assumed</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_3"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Test for Equality of Means</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >t</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >df</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean Difference</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Std. Error Difference</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >95% Confidence Interval of the Difference</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.608</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163,265</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0224830755</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0086192105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0055896134</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0393765376</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.696</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14,830.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0224830755</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0083394780</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0061366649</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0388294861</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Relation between atmospheric temperature and LnLF/HF (male)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-8203708x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Relation between atmospheric temperature and LnLF/HF (female)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-8203708x8.png"/></fig><p>with categories for days below 1013 Hpa and above 1013 Hpa, respectively. Data by pressure category is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p><p>LF/HF for each entry was converted to the LnLF/HF logarithm, and the difference in population mean between each was analyzed. Results for males are seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, and those for females in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p><p>The results show a trend in which there is a significant increase in sympathetic nervous activity in both males and females the higher the pressure is (P value &lt; statistical significance 0.0.5)</p><p>According to prior research, low pressure systems associated with weather irregularity increase parasympathetic nervous activity, such as in bradycardia, decreased granulocytes, increased lymphocytes, decreased urinary adrenaline, et cetera. The body becomes sluggish and one feels depressed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref21">21</xref>] in high pressure systems associated with fair weather, there is increased sympathetic nervous activity, with exacerbated release of dopamine in the corpus striatum, exacerbated release of peripheral catecholamine, et cetera, causing one to feel comfortable and at ease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref22">22</xref>] . In this way, this research shows similar trends to those found in prior research, and we were able to successfully use the data set of approximately 200,000 entries to statistically demonstrate this autonomic nervous system function. We believe this represents an extremely useful set of reference data that can be used for adjusting day-to-day lifestyles to account for atmospheric pressure changes, to control health, et cetera.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. The Relation between Autonomic Nervous System and Precipitation</title><p>In this section, we examine the relationship between precipitation and the autonomic nervous system. Data on atmospheric pressure averages was downloaded from the Japan Meteorological Agency’s website [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref16">16</xref>] and the</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Data by atmospheric pressure category</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pressure</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Man</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Female</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Under 1013 Hpa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40,984</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87,558</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128,542</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 1013 Mpa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36,934</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75,709</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112,643</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77,918</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163,267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241,185</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="6"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> T-test data: atmospheric pressure and LnLF/HF (male)</title></caption><table-wrap id="6_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >HPAJag</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Error Mean</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >LnLF/HF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Under 1013 Hpa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40,964</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4836457632</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9072410738</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0044814188</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 1013 Hpa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36,934</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5210314105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9226212556</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0048007632</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="6_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slg.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >LnLF/HF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equal variances assumed</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >8.402</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.004</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equal variances not assumed</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="6_3"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Test for Equality of Means</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >t</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >df</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean Difference</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Std. Error Difference</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >95% Confidence Interval of the Difference</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.698</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77,916</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.037385647</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0065616416</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.050246424</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.024524870</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.693</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76,794.088</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.037385647</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0065673771</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.050257669</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.024513626</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><table-wrap-group id="7"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> T-test data: atmospheric pressure and LnLF/HF (female)</title></caption><table-wrap id="7_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >HPA_flag</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Error Mean</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >LnLF/HF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Under 1013 Hpa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87,558</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.362064544</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.917884073</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003101987</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 1013 Hpa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75,709</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.385340987</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.935254525</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003399038</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >LnLF/HF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equal variances assumed</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >22.594</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equal variances not assumed</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_3"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >t-test for Equality of Means</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >t</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >df</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sig (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean Difference</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Std. Error Difference</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >95% Confidence Interval of the Difference</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.065</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163,265</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.023276443</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0045954590</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.032283441</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.014269445</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.058</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158,978.471</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.023276443</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0046017152</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.032295705</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.014257181</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Relation between atmospheric pressure and LnLF/HF (male)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-8203708x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Relation between atmospheric pressure and LnLF/HF (female)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-8203708x10.png"/></fig><p>date of measurements and data from each prefecture tied to measured values by city as grouped by ordinance- designated city.</p><p>The precipitation intervals were grouped around 10 mm of precipitation in a 24-hour period, with categories for days below 10 mm and above 10 mm, respectively. Data by precipitation is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>.</p><p>LF/HF for each entry was converted to the LnLF/HF algorithm, and the difference in population mean between each was analyzed. Results for males are seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>, and those for females in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0 and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>.</p><p>The results show a trend in which there is a significant increase in sympathetic nervous activity in both males and females the more rain there is (P value &lt; statistical significance 0.05).</p><p>In general, it is understood that on days with fair weather, there is more oxygen in the atmosphere, and this increases oxygen pressure in the bloodstream, causing the body to prioritize sympathetic nervous activity; by contrast, on cloudy days with poor weather, there is less oxygen, and this decreases oxygen pressure in the bloodstream, causing the body to prioritize parasympathetic nervous activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref20">20</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref22">22</xref>] . This research hypothesized that a similar biological phenomenon would be present in the autonomic nervous system. We believe this represents an extremely useful set of reference data that can be used for adjusting day-to-day lifestyles to account for precipitation changes, to control health, et cetera.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>In this research, we used our previously-developed smartphone camera-based heart rate change analysis system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref8">8</xref>] to survey the correlation between weather patterns and the autonomic nervous system across a big data set of approximately 200,000 entries.</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Data by precipitation volume</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Precipitation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Man</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Female</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Under 10 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74,536</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153,634</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >228,170</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 10 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3382</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9633</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,015</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77,918</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163,267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241,185</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="9"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> T-test data: precipitation and LnLF/HF (male)</title></caption><table-wrap id="9_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Precipitation_Flag</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sid. Error Mean</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >LnLF/HF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Under 10 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74,536</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.503473688</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9158507122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0033546070</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 10 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3382</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4549370943</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8889709991</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0152862441</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="9_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >LnLF/HF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equal variances assumed</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >2.923</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.087</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equal variances not assumed</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="9_3"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >t-test for Equality of Means</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >t</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >df</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean Difference</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Std. Error Difference</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >95% Confidence Interval of the Difference</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77,916</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0485365939</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0160815563</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0170168431</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0800563447</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3714.105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0485365939</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0156500047</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0178531491</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0792200387</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><table-wrap-group id="10"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> T-test data: precipitation and LnLF/HF (female)</title></caption><table-wrap id="10_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Precipitation_Flag</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Error Mean</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >LnLF/HF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Under 10 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153,634</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3762990589</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9268479336</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0023646388</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over 10 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9633</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3179797096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9115128369</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0092871404</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="10_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Levene’s Test for Equality of Variances</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >LnLF/HF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equal variances assumed</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >3.302</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.069</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equal variances not assumed</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="10_3"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >t-test for Equality of Means</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >t</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >(Jf)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sig (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean Difference</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Std. Error Difference</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >95% Confidence Interval of the Difference</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Upper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.997</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163,265</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0583193492</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0097255108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0392575630</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0773811354</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.085</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,918.459</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0583193492</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0095834489</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0395340521</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0771046464</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Relation between precipitation and LnLF/HF (male)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-8203708x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Relation between precipitation and LnLF/HF (female)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-8203708x12.png"/></fig><p>The results showed a trend in which a significant decrease was seen in sympathetic nervous activity in both males and females―the higher the temperature. In addition, a significant increase was seen in the sympathetic nervous system in both males and females―the higher the atmospheric pressure. Lastly, a significant decrease was seen in the sympathetic nervous system in both males and females―the more precipitation there was. These results accord with prior research and with human biological phenomena, and we were able to use a data set of approximately 200,000 entries to statistically demonstrate our hypothesis. We believe this represents a valuable set of reference data for use in the health care.</p><p>Our smartphone camera-based heart rate change analysis system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67690-ref8">8</xref>] is accreting several tens of thousands of new data points on the autonomic nervous system daily. Once the data exceeds one million entries, we believe we will be in a position to conduct a more fine-grained analysis of the impact of autonomic nervous system function in daily life.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Makoto Komazawa,Kenichi Itao,Hiroyuki Kobayashi,Zhiwei Luo, (2016) On Human Autonomic Nervous Activity Related to Weather Conditions Based on Big Data Measurement via Smartphone. Health,08,894-904. doi: 10.4236/health.2016.89093</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.67690-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fechtali, T, Abraini, J.H., Kriem, B. and Rostain, J.C. (1994) Pressure Increases de Novo Synthesized Striatal Dopamine Release in Free-Moving Rats. Neuroreport, 5, 725-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199402000-00017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yukiokaetc</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Effect of Changes of Atmospheric Pressure on the Autonomic Nervous of Rheumatoid Arthritis</article-title><source> Clinical Rheumatology</source><volume> 22</volume>,<fpage> 32</fpage>-<lpage>36</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fukuda, M., Moroda, T., Toyabe, S., Iiai, T., Kawachi, Y., Takahashi, H., Iwanaga, T., Okada, M. and Abo, T. (1996) Granulocytosis Induced by Increasing Sympathetic Nerve Activity Contributes to the Incidence of Acute Appendicitis. Biomedical Research, 17, 171-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.2220/biomedres.17.171</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kobayashi, H. (2011) Why “This” Is of Good Health? Sunmark Publishing Inc.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yukishita, T., Lee, K., Kim, S., Yumoto, Y., Kobayashi, A., Shirasawa, T. and Kobayashi, H. (2010) Age and Sex-Dependent Alterations in Heart Rate Variability: Profiling the Characteristics of Men and Women in Their 30s. Anti-Aging Medicine, 7, 94-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.3793/jaam.7.94</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Japan Meteorological Agency. http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/kishou/know/yougo_hp/kion.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Japan Meteorological Agency. http://www.data.jma.go.jp/gmd/risk/obsdl/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ren, C., O’Neill, M.S., Park, S.K., Sparrow, D., Vokonas, P. and Schwartz, J. (2011) Ambient Temperature, Air Pollution, and Heart Rate Variability in an Aging Population. American Journal of Epidemiology, 173, 1013-1021.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okada, M. and Kakehashi, M. (2014) Effects of Outdoor Temperature on Changes in Physiological Variables before and after Lunch in Healthy Women. International Journal of Biometeorology, 58, 1973-1981.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Komazawa, M., Itao, K. and Luo, Z. (2015) The Relationship between Autonomic Nervous System and Circadian rhythm Based on about 100,000 of Measurement Data. 22nd Poster Presentation Collection of the Academy of Human Informatics, 14-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Komazawa, M., Itao, K. and Luo, Z. (2015) The Relationship between Autonomic Nervous System and Age, BMI Based on about 100,000 of Measurement Data. 21st Poster Presentation Collection of the Academy of Human Informatics, 24-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WIN Frontier Co., Ltd. (2015) COCOLOLO Heart Furnace-Stress Check Using the Fluctuation of Heart Rate. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.winfrontier.COCOLOLO&amp;hl=ja</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WIN Frontier Co., Ltd. (2015r) COCOLOLO—Check 8 Types of Feelings with the Fluctuation of the Heart Rate. https://itunes.apple.com/jp/app/cocololo-cafe-kimochishea/id973325431?mt=8&amp;ignmpt=uo%3D4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kobayashi, H. (2016) COCOLOLO: Autonomic Nervous System Are Complete by the Stress Check of the Heart in 30 Seconds. GOMA BOOK Co., Ltd. http://www.goma-books.com/archives/36436</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Komazawa, M., Itao, K. and Luo, Z. (2015) Development of Heart Rate Variability Analysis System Using a Smart-Phone Camera. 20th Poster Presentation Collection of the Academy of Human Informatics, 19-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mikio, H. (2010) Spectral Analysis. AsakuraPub, Tokyo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. (1996) Heart Rate Variability: Standards of Measurement, Physiological Interpretation, and Clinical Use. Circulation, 93, 1043-1065. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.1043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fumio, M., et al. (2001) Basic Research to Estimate Athlete’s Psychological Stress Responses by Digital Plethysmography. Research Bulletin, 29, 87/102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WIN Frontier Co. Ltd. (2013) Lifescore Quick. http://www.winfrontier.com/lifescorequick.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Union Tool Co. (2013) Wearable Heart Rate Sensor WHS-1. http://uniontool.co.jp/product/sensor/index_02.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Itao, K. and Komazawa, M. (2015) Wearable Device Applications and Technology Tends. Japan Institute of Electronics Packaging, Special Issue, 18, 384-389.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67690-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Onaka</surname><given-names> T. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>Stress and Its Neural Mechanisms</article-title><source> Journal of Pharmacological Sciences</source><volume> 126</volume>,<fpage> 170</fpage>-<lpage>173</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>