<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JSS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Social Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5952</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jss.2016.45031</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JSS-67649</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Factors Inhabiting ICTs usage among Farmers: Comparative Analysis from Pakistan and China
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muhammad</surname><given-names>Yaseen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shiwei</surname><given-names>Xu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wen</surname><given-names>Yu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muhammad</surname><given-names>Luqman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sadia</surname><given-names>Hassan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muhammad</surname><given-names>Ameen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Agricultural Engineering, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>05</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>287</fpage><lpage>294</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>28</month>	<year>May</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   The current study aimed to provide comparative analysis between Pakistan and China regarding factors inhabiting ICTs usage by farmers. Population of this study contained two categories. Firstly, the population was comprised of PunjabprovinceofPakistanselected purposively. Secondly, population comprises ofHebeiprovinceofChinaselected purposively as the study province. For this purpose 160 respondents were selected from eight villages of Punjab province inPakistanand 122 respondents were selected from six villages ofHebeiprovince inChina. The results revealed that there is significant influence of socio-economic characteristics like age, education, and income and sources of farmers inPakistanwith compare toChina. In case of Pakistan information and communication technologies used by farming community are in the form of telephone (6.25%), mobile (100%), computer (38.12%), internet (11.88%), TV (80.63%), radio (10.63%) and newspaper (7.5%) while in case of China rural farmers are using telephone (18.03%), mobile (99.18%), computer (29.51%), internet (17.21%), TV (99.18%), radio (9.02%) and newspaper (3.28%) of farmers have no opinion. Keeping in view the results the government ofPakistanshould concentrate on efficient use of computer and internet. Similarly, government ofChinashould also concentrate on best use of computer and internet towards adoption of advanced technologies. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Comparision</kwd><kwd> Factors</kwd><kwd> China</kwd><kwd> Pakistan</kwd><kwd> ICT</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in an innovative way for development of agriculture sector which is the most vital part of economy in most of the developing countries. This sector claims to be important being ensures poverty reduction and food security and is responsible for the provision of sustainable livelihoods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref1">1</xref>]. With the advancement in communication technologies and its mechanism, extension and rural advisory services are going to be more reliant on ICTs as to be flourishing in more efficient, appropriate and innovative ways for delivery of agro-based advanced technologies to the end-users. Moreover, ICT based extension and advisory services play a vital role in provision of agricultural information and knowledge for farmers. Keeping in view the significance of ICTs in overall agricultural advancement, it is necessary to promote ICT based agricultural information dissemination to enhance agricultural productivity on one hand and also to provide sustainable agricultural information delivery mechanism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>Adopting ICTs as source of agricultural information is a very complex and critical procedure. It involves various steps and factors at farmer’s level. Out of these factors, socio-economic profile of farmers placed a prominent position as in adoption process key role is their socio-economics. Various studies have been conducted to investigate socio-economic factors influencing behavior of farming community with regard to ICT based agricultural extension services, approaches and other social activities. Diversified demographic attributes have been supposed to be manipulated by intellectual and social and economic variation associated with behavior [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref3">3</xref>]. These factors may also be proficient for different policies to promote acceptance of ICT oriented agronomic practices among farmers for support in improving farm productivity and sustainability in agriculture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref4">4</xref>]. In contrary to this, it has also been found that there is significant association between some demographics of farmers like age and education of farmers and their development or advancement in their technological information [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref5">5</xref>]. The relationship between educational profile of farmers with their advancement in ICTs adoption and usage was also presented by Atibioke et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>With similar notion Arfan, et al. (2015) reported that some demographics of farmers like education, size of farm and income demonstrates a most significant positive linkages with the enhanced knowledge level of the farming community [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref7">7</xref>]. It was also investigated that the demographic characters should be concentrated to acquire maximum productivity of resources developed for the enhancement of agricultural information and knowledge of the farming community. Likewise, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref8">8</xref>] it was also observed that majority (70.1%) of extension staff were men, having almost eleven years working experience and aged more than 40 years. Furthermore, statistical variation was found which indicates that the farmer’s age, education, experience and gender, were considerably related with the benefits perceived by farmers. Some outcomes also exposed that socio-economic factors of youth including young males and females have better information related to profits by agro-based farms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref9">9</xref>]. There is a momentous relation between gender and farming scientific implementation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref6">6</xref>].</p><p>So in the light of above situation the present study was designed to investigate different factors like age, education, size of land holding, family size, professions or occupations etc. which have influence on farmers’ behavior to adopt information commutation technologies in agriculture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref10">10</xref>]. The present study is comparative analysis of developing country like Pakistan with most emerging economies the People Republic of China . This study provides guidelines for other developing countries including Pakistan to initiate strategies and policies for ICT oriented agricultural information packages for farming community to equip them with latest agricultural knowledge to apply at their farms for sustainable agriculture and rural development.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Data and Methodology</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Description of Data</title><p>The results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> revealed that 55% of farmers from Pakistan have age more than 50 years while 45% have age equal or less than 50 years while in case of China 32.79% of farmers have more than 50 years age</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Demographic attribute of farmers in Pakistan and China</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Attributes</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Pakistan</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >China</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Percentage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age in years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >45%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.21%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >55%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.79%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Education (schooling years)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09.84%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.8%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.16%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Family size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.2%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.9%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.8%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Land holding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.18%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Farming</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.25%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Business</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Govt. job</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01.64%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Off-farm job</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.11%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>and majority (67.21%) of farmers have age equal or less than 50 years. Education level of farmers in Pakistan is 56.3% and 43.8% for 10 or less schooling years and above 10 years of schooling respectively. In China 9.84% and 90.16% farmers have less or 10 and above 10 schooling years of education. Majority of farmers’ (83.1%) have family size of 5 or less number of persons and some (16.9%) of farmers’ have family size above 5 number of individuals. While in China only 26.2% of farmers’ have family members of 5 or less while, 73.8% of farmers have family size of more than 5 individuals.</p><p>Similarly, land holding size for farmers in Pakistan is equal or less than 12 acres for 41% farmers and more than 12 acres for 59% farmers, in China more than 99% farmers have above 12 acres land size and only less than 1% have equal or less than 12 acres land size. As for as occupation or profession of farming community is concerned in case of Pakistan overwhelming majority (90%) of farmers have farming occupation while business, government job and off-farm job are occupation of 0.6%, 7.5% and 1.9% of farmers respectively. While in case of China majority (85.25%) of farmers has farming occupation, 1.64% and 13.11% farmers have government job and off-farm jobs respectively although no one has business as occupation in China .</p><p>According to results indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, in Pakistan only 6.25% of farmers are utilizing landline telephone while all of the respondents are using mobile phone for the sake of agricultural information, similarly computer, internet, TV, radio and newspaper is used by 38.12%, 11.88%, 80.63%, 10.63% and 7.50% respectively for the propose to get agricultural information. While in China , landline telephone is used by 18.03% of farmers and 99.18% of farmers use mobile phone to get latest information related to agriculture. Computer, internet, TV, Radio and Newspapers are used by 17.21%, 99.18%, 9.02% and 3.28% respectively by the farmers with regard to obtain latest technology information related to agriculture.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Population of Study</title><p>As the present research was conducted in two countries i.e. Pakistan and China , therefore population of this</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Information &amp; communication technologies application in Pakistan and China</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Attributes</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Pakistan</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >China</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Freq.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Freq.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Freq.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Freq.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Telephone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mobile</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Computer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Internet</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Radio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Newspaper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.72</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>study was consisted of two categories. The first category of the population was comprises of Punjab province of Pakistan which is the largest on the basis of population with a share of 54% of country’s total population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref11">11</xref>]. The selection of the Punjab province was based on purposive method. The province is also most industrialized province of Pakistan , containing manufacturing industries like textiles, electronic equipments, surgical appliances, metal, processed foods etc. It has arable land as greatest natural resource with 35.2% agricultural land [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref12">12</xref>]. Punjab has 36 districts and major crops of province includes wheat and cotton are major crops of the province other crops include; rice, sugarcane, maize, millet, pulses, oilseeds, vegetables and fruits. Agriculture is core of Punjab ’s economy, as it supplies nearly 68% in national grain produce annually. Cultivated land area of province is 51 million acres and above 9 million acres are in the cultivable waste form in various regions of province [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>The 2<sup>nd</sup> category of population comprises of Hebei province of China selected purposively as the study province, because of its locality extremely to north of Yellow River, is situated in north China and its climate is monsoon influenced with cold and dry winter, hot and humid summer. In 2014, GDP of Hebei was 2.942 trillion RMB, and ranked at 6th in the country. Nearly 40% of labor force of province is directly involved in agricultural farming, forestry and livestock production. Major crops are wheat, maize, sorghum, millet, cotton, peanut, soybeans, sesame and fruits especially grapes. Total cultivated area of province is about 6.7 million hectares, producing 25 million tons farm produce annually. Hebei is famous for being major cotton producing province and given rise to a large-scale textile industry. Other industries including modern logistics, information technology, medicine, steel, petrochemical, office machinery and clothing industries are playing important role in development of provincial economy as well as boost up for country’s economy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67649-ref14">14</xref>]. All the farmers residing in Punjab province of Pakistan and Hebei Province of China are were considered as population of this study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Samples and Procedures for Sampling</title><p>Multistage sampling design was adopted in this study. Out of the 36 districts of the Punjab four districts D. G. Khan, Faisalabad , Muzafargarh and Sargodha , from Punjab province were randomly selected and then from each district one tehsil were selected; two villages were selected from each tehsil based on simple random sampling technique. From each village 20 household farmers were selected again by using simple random sampling. Total samples of 160 household farmers were selected on random basis. Similarly, Hebei province was randomly selected from China after that Huailai County was selected randomly and then six villages were selected from Huailai County by using simple random techniques. Total sample of 122 household farmers were selected from 6 villages including; Dongshuiquan, Shimenwan, Anyingpu, Paoercun, Yanjiafang, and Zhanjiaying.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Collection and Tool</title><p>Household farmers are key stakeholder with regard to agricultural development; therefore, face-to-face interviews method was used with the help of validated and expert reviewed questionnaire. In order to get direct opinion and response of household farmers regarding different parameters included in present study. Questionnaire comprised of different sections like; demographic characteristics of household farmers, agricultural extension teaching methodologies, information &amp; communication technologies etc. Different experts related to agricultural extension, rural development, agricultural economics etc. from Pakistan and China reviewed the questionnaire to maintain validity of research instrument used. Questionnaire was translated into Chinese language to collect data from China ; a team comprising professors and students of Agricultural Information Institute (AII) of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) Beijing China has accomplished this task.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Model Selection and Analysis</title><p>Data analysis was carried out by using STATA software and applying logistic regression model for this study. Application of ICTs among farmers was measured as dichotomous, using value 1 for application of ICTs among farmer and 0 otherwise. Model specification for calculation is given below:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67649-formula117"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/67649x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/67649x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is probability of application of computer as ICTs in agriculture by farmers in Pakistan.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67649-formula118"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/67649x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/67649x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is probability of application of computer as ICTs in agriculture by farmers in China.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67649-formula119"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/67649x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/67649x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is probability of application of internet as ICTs in agriculture by farmers in Pakistan.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67649-formula120"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/67649x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/67649x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is probability of application of internet as ICTs in agriculture by farmers in China.</p><p>Listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> are variables and their explanation which were used in the study.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>The results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> indicate that in Pakistan education of household head is most significant with regard to adoption of computer as ICTs in agriculture because one unit increase in education level of household head will increase the odds of computer application by factor of 2.55. Similarly income and land area of household farmers has significant influence on computer application as ICTs, as one unit increase in income and land area of household will increase odds of computer application by factor of 0.999 and 1.096 respectively. While in case of China income and education of household head has most significant effect on computer application as ICTs tool as data shows that one unit increase in income and education of household head will increase odds of computer application by factor of 1.00 and 1.302 respectively.</p><p>The results shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> indicate that in Pakistan farming occupation of household head has influence in</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> variables used and their explanation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Explanation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >if_com</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Application of computer as ICT in agriculture by household head</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >if_int</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Application of internet as ICT in agriculture by household head</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household head’s (farmer) age</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >edu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household head’s (farmer) education</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >f_size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household head’s (farmer) family size</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >if_farm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dummy variable; 1 = farming as source of income, 0=otherwise</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >land_area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household head’s total land holding</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >income</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Annual income of household head</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >_cons</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >constant</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Factors effecting computer application by farmers in Pakistan &amp; China</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Country</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >if_com</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Odds Ratio</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Z</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P &gt; |Z|</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Pakistan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.828</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Number of obs = 47 LR chi<sup>2</sup> = 28.84 Prob &gt; chi<sup>2</sup> = 0.0001 Log likelihood = −17.634 Pseudo R<sup>2</sup> = 0.449</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >edu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.552</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.005</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >f_size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.842</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.575</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >if_farm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.513</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >land_area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.077</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >income</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >_cons</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.154</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >China</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.957</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.201</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Number of obs = 122 LR chi2 = 41.81 Prob &gt; chi2 = 0.000 Log likelihood = −53.107 Pseudo R2 = 0.282</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >edu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >f_size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.217</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >if_farm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.353</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >land_area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0193</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.354</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >income</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.005</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >_cons</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.120</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Factors effecting internet application by farmers in Pakistan and China</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Country</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >if_int</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Odds Ratio</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Z</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P &gt; |Z|</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Pakistan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.055</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.380</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Number of obs = 47 LR chi<sup>2</sup> = 17.68 Prob &gt; chi<sup>2</sup> = 0.007 Log likelihood = −10.940 Pseudo R<sup>2</sup> = 0.447</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >edu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.788</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.172</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >f_size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.199</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.688</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >if_farm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.060</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >land_area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.996</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >income</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.290</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >_cons</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.264</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >China</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.935</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.066</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Number of obs = 122 LR chi<sup>2</sup> = 37.45 Prob &gt; chi<sup>2</sup> = 0.000 Log likelihood = −48.180 Pseudo R<sup>2</sup> = 0.280</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >edu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.383</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >f_size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.253</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.030</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >if_farm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.225</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.788</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >land_area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.220</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >income</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.095</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >_cons</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.085</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.247</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>internet application by farming community as results present that one unit increase in farming occupation will increase odds of internet application by household head by factor of 0.023. While this situation is quite different in China, as education of household head has most significant effect on internet application as ICTs tool that indicates one unit increase in education of household head will increase odds of internet application by factor of 1.383. similarly, family size, age and income has also influence on internet application by household head, as results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> depicts that one unit increase in family size, age and income of household head it will increase odds of internet application as ICTs by factor of 1.253, 0.935 and 1.00 respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion &amp; Recommendations</title><p>Education of household head has significant influence in adoption of computer as ICT tool application in agriculture in Pakistan and in China . Household head’s income also manipulates computer application by household farmers in Pakistan as well as in China , with addition to influence of land area occupancy by household farmers in Pakistan . Likewise, usage of internet as ICT tool by household farmers in Pakistan is influenced by farming as occupation of household head. While in China household head’s education has significant influence on internet usage. Similarly, family size, age and income of household head also influence internet application in agriculture.</p><p>On the basis of results following recommended are drawn for government of Pakistan and China:</p><p>1) Education is an import indicator for development, education level of farmer in Pakistan is not satisfactory, while this situation is encouraging in China but government should also increase educational level among farming community.</p><p>2) ICTs should be utilized in more innovative way, because farmers of both country (Pakistan &amp; China) are utilizing mobile phone almost 100%, but there is need to maximize innovativeness in the use of ICTs so that farming community ensure food security, sustainable agriculture and livelihood.</p><p>3) Government of Pakistan should introduce some policies to boost up household income, land reform policies, and increasing involvement of youth in agriculture activities to ensure application of computer and internet in agriculture with goal to enhance agriculture productivity.</p><p>4) Similarly government of China should also ensure involvement of maximum family member in agricultural activities, encouraging youth as well as old aged in agriculture, and by increasing household income to improve application of computer and internet in agriculture to maximize crop productivity.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was supported by the program CAAS-ASTIP-2016-AII. The authors thanks for support from innovation fund founded by the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences .</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Muhammad Yaseen,Shiwei Xu,Wen Yu,Muhammad Luqman,Sadia Hassan,Muhammad Ameen, (2016) Factors Inhabiting ICTs usage among Farmers: Comparative Analysis from Pakistan and China. Open Journal of Social Sciences,04,287-294. doi: 10.4236/jss.2016.45031</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.67649-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arfan, M., Ali S., Safdar, U. and Khan M.A.J. (2015) Study of Association between Demographic Characteristics and Increase in Knowledge of Farmers through Punjab Agricultural Helpline. Journal of Agricultural Research, 53, 287-294.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67649-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Atibioke</surname><given-names> O.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Ogunlade</surname><given-names> I.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Abiodun</surname><given-names> A.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Ogundele</surname><given-names> B.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Omodara</surname><given-names> M.A. and Ade A.R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>Effects of farmers’ Demographic Factors on the Adoption of Grain Storage Technologies Developed by Nigerian Stored Products Research Institute (NSPRI): A Case Study of Selected villages in Ilorin West LGA of Kwara State</article-title><source> Research on Humanities and Social Sciences</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 56</fpage>-<lpage>63</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67649-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azilah, M.A., Foziah, J. and Ho, C.S. (2015) The Effects of Socio-Economic Influences on Households Recycling Behaviour in Iskandar Malaysia. ASEAN-Turkey ASLI (Annual Serial Landmark International) Conference on Quality of Life 2014, ABRA International Conference on Quality of Life, AQoL2014, 26-28 December 2014, Istanbul, Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 202, 124-134.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67649-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burton, R.J.F. (2014) The Influence of Farmer Demographic Characteristics on Environmental Behavior: A Review. Journal of Environmental Management, 135, 19-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67649-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CIA-Central Intelligence Agency (2016) the World Fact Book: South Asia, Pakistan.  
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pk.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67649-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, J., Barbieri, C. and Valdivia, C. (2014) a Socio-Demographic Examination of the Perceived Benefits of Agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems, 88, 301-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9683-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67649-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Government of the Pakistan (2015) Economics Survey 2014-15, Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad Pakistan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67649-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Government of the Punjab (2016) Budget: Agriculture Department Government of the Punjab, Pakistan.  
http://www.agripunjab.gov.pk/budget</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67649-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Govt. of the Hebei (2015) The People’s Government of Hebei Province.   
http://www.hebei.gov.cn/english/10718809/10719846/10721308/index.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67649-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Landini, F. and Bianqui, V. (2014) Socio-Demographic Profile of Different Samples of Latin American Rural Extensionists. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, 44, 575-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782014000300030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67649-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Philip, T.K. and Isaac, N.I. (2012) Demographic Characteristics, Agricultural and Technological Profile of Acha Farmers in Nigeria. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 14, 89-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67649-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rochecouste, Jean-F., Dargusch, P., Cameron, D. and Smith, C. (2015) An Analysis of the Socio-Economic Factors Influencing the Adoption of Conservation Agriculture as a Climate Change Mitigation Activity in Australian Dry-Land Grain Production. Agricultural Systems, 135, 20-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.12.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67649-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yonazi, E., Kelly, T., Halewood, N. and Blackman, C. (2012) eTransform Africa: The Transformational use of ICTs in Africa.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67649-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Y., Wang, L. and Duan, Y. (2016) Agri-cultural Information Dissemination Using ICTs: A Review and Analysis of Information Dissemination Models in China. Information Processing in Agriculture, 3, 17-29.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2015.11.002</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>