<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JASMI</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Analytical Sciences, Methods and Instrumentation</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-2745</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jasmi.2016.62005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JASMI-67634</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Potentiometric Evaluation of Stability Constants of Two-Step Overlapping Equilibria via a Bilogarithmic Hyperbolic Cosine Method
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samuel</surname><given-names>Beaumont</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Julia</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Agustin</surname><given-names>G. Asuero</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>asuero@us.es(AGA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>06</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>43</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>7</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>20</month>	<year>June</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A bilogarithmic hyperbolic cosine method for the evaluation of overlapping formation constants at varying (or fixed) ionic strength is devised in this paper and applied to data reported in the analytical literature, i.e. succinic acid system, Cu(II)-glycine system and Ag(I)-aminobutan-1-ol system. The method is based on the linearization of the formation function ? = f(pH) or ? = f(pL) data. A theoretical slope of unity should be obtained thus proving the correctness of the assumed equilibria. An additional advantage of the bilogarithmic method proposed is that it provides a closed scale representation of Y and X unlike other plots. This paper forms part of an investigation into the uses of bilogarithmic methods and hyperbolic functions in parameter estimation. Methods based on the application of spectrophotometric measurements have been the subject of recent studies.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Formation Acidity Constants</kwd><kwd> Overlapping Equilibria</kwd><kwd> Potentiometric Measurements</kwd><kwd> Bilogarithmic Hyperbolic Cosine Method</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The exact determination of the thermodynamic formation constants of many dibasic acids is complicated by the overlapping [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref4">4</xref>] of the successive ionization steps. A great many methods have been derived [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref7">7</xref>] for the potentiometric evaluation of formation constants of two-step simultaneous equilibria. Of them, methods based on the formation function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref8">8</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref12">12</xref>] , &#241; = f(pH), have been, undoubtedly, the most widely applied. The present paper describes a procedure for the study of stepwise equilibria in potentiometric titration, which is also based on Bjerrum’s function. Data (&#241;, pH) are linearized according to a bilogarithmic mathematical model via a hyperbolic cosine method relationship. The treatment of the (&#241;, pH) data by the procedure derived in this paper does not require that the ionic strength is maintained constant by addition of inert salt. This paper forms part of an investigation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref13">13</xref>] into the uses of bilogarithmic methods and hyperbolic functions in parameter estimation. Methods based on the application of spectrophotometric measurements have been the subject [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref14">14</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref16">16</xref>] of recent studies.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Theory</title><p>For a diprotic acid H<sub>2</sub>R, the average proton number [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref18">18</xref>] (the average number of proton bound per R) is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula1"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where charges have been omitted for convenience. The stepwise thermodynamic formation constants of the acid is defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula2"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula3"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where parenthesis indicate activities and braces concentrations; f<sub>2</sub>, f<sub>1</sub> and f<sub>0</sub> being the activity coefficients of the species H<sub>2</sub>R, HR and R, respectively.</p><p>By combining Equations ((1)-(3)) we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula4"><label>. (4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>On rearrangement Equation (4), we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula5"><label>. (5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Two different situations will be considered in that follows depending whether the proton number values were lower or higher than the unity.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Procedure for Average Number Values Lower Than the Unity</title><p>By dividing Equation (5) by (H)<sup>3/2</sup>, a further rearrangement leads to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula6"><label>. (6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By multiplying and dividing the right hand of Equation (6) by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula7"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula8"><label>. (8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Making</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula9"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and taking into account that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula10"><label>. (10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (8) may be converted into</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula11"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where pH = −log(H). By taking logarithmic on both sides of Equation (11), on rearranging we finally get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula12"><label>. (12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, a representation of the left term of Equation (12) against the term into brackets of the right hand should give a straight line (Y = a<sub>0</sub> + a<sub>1</sub>X), obtained by linear regression [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref19">19</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref22">22</xref>] , whose slope is the unity and the intercept with the X-axis is equal to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, from which the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> may be estimated as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula13"><label>. (13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The application of Equations ((12) and (13)) requires, however, the previous knowledge of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Different values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> may be assumed and the entire procedure then applied. The best value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> may be taken as that satisfies an optimization criterion, e.g. that minimizes the mean quadratic error (MQE) in &#241; measurements</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula14"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where N is the number of data pairs, and &#241; is calculated from Equation (4) once both logK values are known, This task is easily carried out with the aid of an Excel spreadsheet.</p><p>In those cases in which the ionic strength is held constant by addition of an inert salt, e.g. potassium chloride or potassium nitrate 0.1 M, Equation (12) is converted into</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula15"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are mixed or Bronsted constants, whose dependence on ionic strength can be expressed by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula16"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula17"><label>, (17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the stoicheiometric constants and f<sub>H</sub> the activity factor of hydrogen ion. Note that the &#241; values when ionic strength is held constant are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula18"><label>. (18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Procedure for Average Number Values Greater Than Unity</title><p>In these situations, by dividing Equation (5) by (H)<sup>1/2</sup>, on rearrangement we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula19"><label>. (19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By multiplying through</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula20"><label>. (20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (19) is converted into</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula21"><label>. (21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking into account the definition of hyperbolic cosine first and taking decadic logarithms on both sides of the resulting equation then, a posterior rearrangement leads to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula22"><label>. (22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When the left term of Equation (22) is plotted against the term into brackets of the right hand, a straight line (Y = a<sub>0</sub> + a<sub>1</sub>X) of unity slope should be obtained, from which the value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> may be estimated as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula23"><label>. (23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Nevertheless, before Equation (22) can be applied, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>must be known. A procedure analogous to that suggested in the previous section may be followed in order to circumvent this difficulty.</p><p>If the ionic strength is maintained constant during the titration then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula24"><label>. (24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x41.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The basis of this discussion has been protonation reactions, but the same principles apply for metal complexation reactions M + L = ML and ML + L = ML<sub>2</sub></p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula25"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula26"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>being the formation function or Bjerrum index in this case</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula27"><label>. (27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Ionic Strength Expression</title><p>Taking into account that V<sub>0</sub> millilitres of the diprotic acid H<sub>2</sub>R at a concentration C<sub>A</sub> moles/liter, haven been titrated with a volume V of titrant, e.g. a strong monoacid base BOH, of concentration C<sub>B</sub> moles/liter, the computation of ionic strength may be made assuming the Speakman [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref23">23</xref>] expression corrected by the volume, as a first approximation. Then, if C<sub>B</sub>V &lt; C<sub>A</sub>V<sub>0</sub></p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula28"><label>. (28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In those cases in which C<sub>B</sub>V &gt; C<sub>A</sub>V<sub>0 </sub>we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula29"><label>. (29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The Debye-H&#252;ckel equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref24">24</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref26">26</xref>] (or other more sophisticated one) may be employed for the ionic activity coefficients and unity assumed for the activity of the uncharged molecule H<sub>2</sub>R</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula30"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where A and B are constants of the Debye-H&#252;ckel theory, and &#228; is the so-called ion-size parameter, or some extended form of the empirical Debye-H&#252;ckel equation as the Davies equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref27">27</xref>] . The activity coefficient may be evaluated if required by standard iteration to constant f<sub>i</sub>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Error Analysis</title><p>In those cases in which &#241; &lt; 1, the straight line intersect the X-axis at the point</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula31"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>from which we may evaluate the value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> once the value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is known.</p><p>By applying the law of random error propagation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref28">28</xref>] we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula32"><label>. (32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking into account [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref19">19</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref28">28</xref>] the expressions for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula33"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula34"><label>. (34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>An estimate of the uncertainty of these calculations is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula35"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In those cases in which &#241; &gt; 1 then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula36"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the application of the random error propagation law gives in this case</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula37"><label>. (37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Choice of Starting Values</title><p>Two principal difficulties should be self-evident. Primarily the present analysis requires a prior estimate of the individual stability constants. On this respect, preliminary values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> may be evaluated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref29">29</xref>] from Equations ((35) and (36)) by considering three well defined points on the titration curve at &#241; = 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula38"><label>(38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula39"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67634-formula40"><label>. (40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Expressions (35) and (36) are only approximate because of the influence of varying ionic strength. In addition, it is always disadvantageous to calculate stability constant from a minimum amount of experimental data. As a matter of fact, however, even the pH values of &#241; = 0.5 and &#241; = 1.5 may be taken as starting point for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> values, respectively.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Applications</title><p>In order to check the usefulness of the method it has been applied to a variety of systems previously described in the literature. Systems chosen for study were representative of the most difficult experimental situation encountered in practice. All have log K values similar in magnitude thus being very suitable for the purpose of this work. Experimental details and [pH,V] and [pL,&#241;] data employed are given in that follows:</p><p>I. Succinic acid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref24">24</xref>] : C<sub>R</sub> = 0.005 M; V<sub>0</sub> = 100 mL, C<sub>B</sub> = 0.1 M (KOH); T = 25˚. Data [V, pH]: [1.00, 3.677; 1.25, 3.767; 1.50, 3.853; 1.75, 3932; 2.00, 4.009; 2.25, 4.081; 2.50, 4.153; 2.75, 4.223; 3.00, 4.291; 3.25, 4.361; 3.75, 4.498, 4.00, 4.569; 6.00, 5.135; 6.25, 5.204; 6.50, 5.273; 6.75, 5.342; 7.00, 5.412; 7.25, 5.480; 7.50, 5.554; 7.75, 5.629; 8.00, 5.208; 8.25, 5.789; 8.50; 5.881; 8.75, 5.981; 9.00, 6.099].</p><p>II. Cu(II)-Glicine system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref18">18</xref>] at T = 25˚C. Data [pL, &#241;]: [8.667, 0.250; 8.607, 0.270; 8.549, 0.296; 8.492, 0.326; 8.423, 0.351; 8.358, 0.385; 8.294, 0.426; 8.221, 0.463; 8.150, 0.511; 8.076, 0.564; 7.993, 0.620; 7.902, 0.681; 7.803, 0.749; 7.715, 0.807; 7.630, 0.872; 7.215, 1.169; 7.084, 1.251; 6.975, 1.139; 6.838, 1.425; 6.708, 1.515; 6.565, 1.606; 6.380, 1.697; 6.192, 1.788; 5.886, 1.880].</p><p>III. Silver(I)-4-aminobutan-1-ol [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref31">31</xref>] at T = 20˚C and I = 0.5. Data [pL, &#241;]: [4.198, 0.261; 4.121, 0.327; 4.058, 0.392; 4.000, 0.458; 3.950, 0.523; 3.906, 0.589; 3.861, 0.654; 3.818, 0.719; 3.780, 0.785; 3.740, 0.850; 3.700, 0.915; 3.59, 1.110; 3.549, 1.110; 3.516, 1.238; 3.477, 1.303; 3.389, 1.429; 3.292, 1.553; 3.173, 1.671; 3.023, 1.779; 2.824, 1.862].</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the application of the bilogarithmic hyperbolic cosine method (BHCM) to the succinic acid system. The residuals obtained were [− + + + − + − − − + − + +] and [+ + − + − − − + − + + + −] for &#241; &lt; 1 and &#241; &gt; 1, respectively, then show no special pattern. A well defined unity slope, 1.0009 &#177; 0.0043 and 0.9985 &#177; 0.0024, respectively, was obtained in both cases. The results obtained by means of the BHMC method are in good agreement with the values obtained by Albert and Serjeant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref25">25</xref>] by applying a computerized FORTRAN method.</p><p>The ideal methodology devised for H<sub>2</sub>R/HR/R systems may be applied to simultaneous complex systems ML<sub>2</sub>/ML/M. In this case the data available are (pL, &#241;). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> show the application of the BHMC method to the Cu(II)-glycine and Ag(I)-4-aminobutan-1-ol systems, respectively. Irving and Rossotti (18) obtained for the Cu(II)-glycine system (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) values of log K<sub>1</sub> of 8.12 to 8.16 and log K<sub>2</sub> of 6.73 to 6.78. The results obtained in this paper are [8.177 - 8.143] for log K<sub>1</sub>, and [6.772 to 6.645] for log K<sub>2</sub>. The values obtained for &#241; &lt; 1 and &#241; &gt; 1 differ in 0.034 and 0.127 log units, for log K<sub>1</sub> and log K<sub>2</sub>, respectively. The slopes of our method in both cases are close to 1 (0.9787 &#177; 0.0271 for &#241; &lt; 1 and 0.9878 &#177; 0.0134 for &#241; &gt; 1).</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Top left: Mean quadratic error (MQE) as a function of log K<sub>2</sub> assumed (&#241; &lt; 1). Top right: Bilogarithmic plot (&#241; &lt; 1) for the succinic acid system. Bottom left: Mean quadratic error (MQE) as a function of log K<sub>1</sub> assumed (&#241; &gt; 1). Bottom right: Bilogarithmic plot (&#241; &gt; 1) for the succinic acid system</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x67.png"/></fig><p>A well defined slope (1.0073 &#177; 0.0136) was obtained for the system Ag(I)-4-aminobutan-1-ol (&#241; &gt; 1) and values of log K<sub>1</sub> and log K<sub>2</sub> of 3.416 &#177; 0.002 and 3.896 (assumed), respectively. Lansbury et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref30">30</xref>] and Unwin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref31">31</xref>] obtained values of 3.41 and 3.89, respectively, using computerized methods based on the use of weighted least squares, and response surfaces, respectively. The results obtained by applying the BHMC method proposed in this paper coincide with those provided by these authors. The Ag(I)-4-aminobutan-ol system, however, departs from a behaviour model at &#241; &gt; 1 values.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>A major goal of scientific experimentation is the discovery of relationships [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref32">32</xref>] among variables. The evaluation of stability constant by linearized plots on this respect seems to be more prevalent, probably owing to the transparency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref33">33</xref>] of the methods used. Note that non-linear least squares are not always problem-free. Occasionally, problems arise [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref34">34</xref>] because of the choice of the data, initial estimates, convergence or multiple local minima, and all-typical of non-linear regression. A main advantage of the bilogarithmic method devised in this paper is that a theoretical slope of unity should be obtained this proving directly the correctness of the assumed equilibria. Significant deviation from this behaviour is indicative of more complicated phenomena. It is interesting to note</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Top: Graphical representation for the &#241; versus pL data. The curve in the figure is calculated with logK<sub>1</sub> and logK<sub>2</sub> given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> (bilogarithmic method). Bottom left and right: logarithmic plots</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x68.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Top: Graphical representation for the &#241; versus pL data. Bottom left and right: Bilogarithmic plots</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1000196x69.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of results obtained by different methods in the evaluation of formation constants</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >System</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Method</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >log K<sub>1</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >log K<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ref.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Succinic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Computer FORTRAN method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.634</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref24">24</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BHCM (&#241; &lt; 1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.643 &#177; 0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.183</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This paper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BHCM (&#241; &gt; 1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.634</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.199 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This paper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Cu(II)-Glycine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Successive approximation method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref18">18</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Correction term method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref18">18</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Least squares treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8,12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref18">18</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BHCM (&#241; &lt; 1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.143 &#177; 0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.772</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This paper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BCHM (&#241; &gt; 1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.672 &#177; 0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This paper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Ag(I)-4-aminobutan-1-ol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weighted least squares method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref30">30</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Computer FORTRAN technique</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BCHM (&#241; &lt; 1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.416 &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.896</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This paper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BCHM (&#241; &gt; 1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.495</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.818 &#177; 0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This paper</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>that by applying other least-squares procedures, it is not possible to determine whether a given pH against fraction titrated curve is characterized only by the assumed reactions. In this respect, when the independent and dependent variables are varied over a number of orders of magnitudes, the points tend usually [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67634-ref17">17</xref>] to be bunched together. However, an additional advantage of the bilogarithmic method reported here provides a closed scale representation of y and x, unlike other plots. The bilogarithmic hyperbolic tool devised here, for all reasons indicated above, constitutes an appropriate and useful mathematical model for the potentiometric study of simultaneous equilibria.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Samuel Beaumont,Julia Martin,Agustin G. Asuero, (2016) A Potentiometric Evaluation of Stability Constants of Two-Step Overlapping Equilibria via a Bilogarithmic Hyperbolic Cosine Method. Journal of Analytical Sciences, Methods and Instrumentation,06,33-43. doi: 10.4236/jasmi.2016.62005</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.67634-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asuero, A.G. and Michalowski, T. (2011) Comprehensive Formulation of Titration Curves Referred to Complex Acid-Base Systems and Its Analytical Implications. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 41, 151-187.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2011.559440</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Avdeef, A. (2012) pKa Determination. In: Absorption and Drug Development: Solubility, Permeability and Charge State, Chap. 3, 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York, Hoboken, NJ, 31-173.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asuero, A.G., Jimenez, J.L. and Navas, M.J. (1986) Mathematical Treatment of Absorbance versus pH Graphs of Polybasic Acids. Talanta, 33, 929-934. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-9140(86)80228-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asuero, A.G., Jimenez, J.L. and Navas, M.J. (1986) Spectrophotometric Methods for the Evaluation of Acidity Constants: Numerical Methods for Two Step Overlapping Equilibria. Talanta, 33, 531-535.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-9140(86)80265-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goncalves, E.M. and Conceicao, A.C.L. (2011) Constantes de acidez de ácidos dipróticos a partir de titulacoes potentiométricas: ilustracao dos princípios do cálculo através da construcao de um algoritmo muito simples. Quimica Nova, 34, 1074-1078. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422011000600027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jano, I., Hardcastle, J., Jano, L., Bates, K.R. and McCreary, H.E. (2001) General Equation for Determining the Dissociation Constants of Polyprotic Acids and Bases from Additive Property. Part IV. Application to Potentiometric Data. Analytica Chimica Acta, 428, 309-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)01242-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramos, G.R. and Alvarez-Coque, M.C. (1989) Examination of the Least Squares Method Applied to the Evaluation of Physicochemical Parameters with Linearized Equations. Analytica Chimica Acta, 220, 145-153.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)80258-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hurek, J. and Nackiewicz, J. (2013) A Simple Method for the Consecutive Determination of Protonation Constants through Evaluation of Formation Curves. Journal of Chemical Education, 90, 604-608.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed300172a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asuero, A.G. (2007) Buffer Capacity of a Polyprotic Acid: First Derivative of the Buffer Capacity and pKa Values of Simple and Overlapping Equilibria. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 37, 269-301.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408340701266238</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dimitrov, S.S. and Kamenski, D.I. (1997) Overall Stability Constants: Estimation by Non-Linear Least Squares Methods. Computers in Chemistry, 21, 167-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8485(96)00025-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kraft, A. (2003) The Determination of the pKa of Multiprotic Weak Acids by Analyzing Potentiometric Acid-Base Titration Data with Difference Plots. Journal of Chemical Education, 80, 554-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed080p554</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moya-Hernandez, R., Rueda-Jackson, J.C., Ramirez, M.T., Vazquez, G.A., Havel, J. and Rojas-Hernández, A. (2002) Statistical Study of Distribution Diagrams for Two-Component Systems: Relationships of Means and Variances of the Discrete Variable Distributions with Average Ligand Number and Intrinsic Buffer Capacity. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 389-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed079p389</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asuero, A.G. (1989) A Bilogarithmic Method for the Evaluation of Acidity Constants of Amphoteric Substances from Solubility Measurements. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 52, 129-137.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(89)90287-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asuero, A.G. (2009) A Hyperbolic Sine Procedure for the Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Acidity Constants of Two-Step Overlapping Equilibria. Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 64, 1026-1030.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1061934809100098</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sayago, A. and Asuero, A.G. (2006) Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Stability Constants of 1:1 Weak Complexes from Continuous Variation Data. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 321, 94-100.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.05.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boccio, M., Sayago, A. and Asuero, A.G. (2006) A Bilogarithmic Method for the Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Stability Constants of 1:1 Weak Complexes from Mole Ratio Data. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 318, 70-77.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.03.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rossotti, H. (1978) The Study of Ionic Equilibria, an Introduction. Longman, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Irving, H. and Rossotti, H.S. (1953) Methods for Computing Successive Stability Constants from Experimental Formation Curves. Journal of the Chemical Society, 3397-3405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/jr9530003397</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sayago, A., Boccio, M. and Asuero, A.G. (2004) Fitting Straight Lines with Replicated Observations by Linear Regression: The Least Squares Postulates. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 34, 39-50.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408340490273744</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asuero, A.G., Sayago, A. and González, A. (2006) The Correlation Coefficient: An Overview. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 36, 41-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408340500526766</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asuero, A. and Gonzalez, A.G. (1989) Some Observations on Fitting a Straight Line to Data. Microchemical Journal, 40, 216-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0026-265X(89)90073-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asuero, A.G. and Gonzalez, A.G. (2007) Fitting Straight Lines with Replicated Observations by Linear Regression. III. Weighting Data. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 37, 143-172.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408340701244615</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Speakman, J.C. (1940) The Determination of the Thermodynamic Dissociation Constants of Dibasic Acids. Journal of Chemical Society, 855-859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/jr9400000855</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Albert, A. and Serjeant, E.P. (1984) The Determination of Ionization Constants, a Laboratory Manual. 3rd Edition, Chapman &amp; Hall, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5548-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Litchinsky, D., Purdie, N., Tompson, M.B. and White, W.D. (1969) A Rigorous Solution to the Problem of Interfering Dissociation Steps in the Titration of Polybasic Acids. Analytical Chemistry, 41, 1726-1730.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac60282a007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Briggs, T.N. and Stuehr, J.E. (1975) Simultaneous Potentiometric Determination of Precise Equivalence Points and pK Values of Two- and Three-pK Systems. Analytical Chemistry, 47, 916-1920. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac60362a012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Christian, G.D., Dasgupta, P.K. and Schug, K.A. (2015) Analytical Chemistry. 7th Edition, Wiley, New York, 211- 217.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asuero, A.G., Gonzalez, G., de Pablos, F. and Ariza, J.L.G. (1988) Determination of the Optimum Working Range in Spectrophotometric Procedures. Talanta, 35, 131-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-9140(88)80127-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asuero, A.G. (1990) Observations on the Computation of Acidity Constants of Two Step Overlapping Equilibria from the Half Values of the Formation Function. Analytical Letters, 23, 747-753.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00032719008052478</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lansbury, R.C., Price, V.E. and Smetld, A.G. (1965) The Application of Weighted Least Squares Method to the Computation of Stability Constants. Journal of Chemical Society, 1896-1900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/jr9650001896</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Unwin, E.A., Beimer, R.G. and Fernando, Q. (1967) The Use of a Digital Computer for the Calculations of Successive Complex Formation. Analytica Chimica Acta, 39, 95-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0003-2670(01)80459-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Connors, K.A. (1987) Binding Constants, the Measurement of Molecular Complex Stability. Wiley, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fuchs, H. and Gessner, R. (2001) The Result of Equilibrium-Constant Calculations Strongly Depends on the Evaluation Method Used and on the Type of Experimental Errors. Biochemical Journal, 359, 411-418.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bj3590411</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67634-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nievergelt, Y. (1994) Exact Equations for the Equilibrium Constants of Single Complexes in Terms of Spectrophotometric Data. Analyst, 119, 145-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/an9941900145</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>