<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ABCR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Breast Cancer Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2168-1589</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/abcr.2016.53011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ABCR-67542</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy after Conservative Breast Surgery in Early Breast Cancer
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hend</surname><given-names>Ahmed El-Hadaad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hanan</surname><given-names>Ahmed Wahba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Waleed</surname><given-names>Elnahas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sameh</surname><given-names>Roshdy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Clinical Oncology &amp;amp; Nuclear Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Surgical Oncology Unite, Mansoura Oncology Center, Mansoura, Egypt</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>hend_am@mans.edu.eg(HAE)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>21</day><month>06</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>97</fpage><lpage>102</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>15</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>18</month>	<year>June</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Radiation therapy after breast conserving surgery is a standard part of treatment for invasive breast cancer. Based on radiobiological models, it was found that shorter radiation schedules offered the promise of equivalent local control to standard radiation therapy by giving larger doses per fraction in shorter period of time. Methods: This study included 36 female patients with operable invasive stage I-II breast cancer. These patients underwent microscopic wide local excision of the primary tumor and lymph node dissection. They received adjuvant radiotherapy. The radiation dose was 40 Gy total dose in 15 fractions for whole breast and additional dose of 9 Gy in three consecutive fractions was delivered to tumour cavity simultaneously. Results: Mean age was 52 years (range: 30 - 67); most patients were of stage II disease and Grade II was the most common one. Invasive ductal carcinoma was reported in 94.4% and 72.2% of patients were hormone receptor positive. After median follow-up of 52 months, all patients were alive and ipsilateral local recurrence was reported in 1 case only. Grade IV radiation toxicity was not observed; moist desquamation was the most common acute reaction (61%) with grade III in 5.5% followed by dry desquamation in 55.6% of grade I only. Grade I erythema was recorded in 41.7% and grade II in 11%. Fibrosis was the most frequent late reaction (44.3%) with grade II in 11% followed by telengectesia then pigmentation (41.7%, 33.3% respectively). Conclusion: The regimen used in this study appears promising with acceptable acute toxicities and convenient for our patients and has the advantage of economic use of radiation facilities. However, larger number of patients and longer period of follow-up are needed for further evaluation.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Conservative Breast Surgery</kwd><kwd> Radiotherapy</kwd><kwd> Concomitant Boost</kwd><kwd> Breast Cancer</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is often preferred by patients as it provides improved cosmosis and decreased psychological trauma. BCS is considered as the standard of care for patients with stage I-II disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref1">1</xref>] . The addition of whole-breast irradiation (WBI) to BCS results in a significant reduction in the risk of death due to breast cancer and local recurrence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>BCS consisted of resection of the primary breast tumor (lumpectomy, segmental mastectomy or wide local excision) followed by WBI with total radiation dose of 45 - 50 Gy to the entire breast over 5 - 6 weeks (1.8 - 2 Gy per fraction). In most patients, 10 - 16 Gy boost to the tumor bed is added [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>However, 30% of patients who undergo BCS do not receive adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref5">5</xref>] . These may be contributed to many issues: as long time (7 - 8 weeks) of RT, lack of transportation, poor ambulatory status of the patients, significant shortage of radiation therapy equipment and busy radiation centers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref7">7</xref>] . So the possibility of delivering adjuvant RT in a shorter period of time could help in solving this problem.</p><p>Randomized trials have proved that hypofractionated WBI is equivalent to more conventional WBI with respect to local recurrence and cosmotic outcome [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref8">8</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Simultaneous boost dose, concomitant or integrated, has been started in clinics by using 3-D conformal RT or intensity-modulated RT in order to intensify treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate toxicity (acute and late) and local disease-free survival (DFS) of a hypofractionated three weeks WBI schedule with the addition of a concomitant boost dose delivered to tumor bed once a week in patients with early breast cancer undergoes BCS and sentinel node dissection.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><p>This study included 36 female patients with operable invasive stage I-II breast cancer (as defined by AJCC 2002) referred to Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine department, Mansoura University Hospital in the period between January 2010 to June 2014.</p><p>Other eligibility criteria included: Female patients &gt;18 years; underwent microscopic wide local excision of the primary tumor and lymph node dissection, no previous RT or chemotherapy and normal hematological, liver and kidney function.</p><p>18 patients underwent inferior pedicle therapeutic mammoplasty, 7 patients round block technique was done and in these all 25 patients the tumour bed was marked by clips, 8 patients lateral mammoplasty was performed and the other 3 patients just wide local excision without any plastic procedures. In these 11 patients no clips markings as the tumour bed was under the scare. Level 1 and 2 axillary dissection was done for all patients.</p><p>Exclusion criteria were: evidence of distant metastasis, presence of serious co-morbidities that could preclude RT as cardiovascular or psychiatric diseases, positive margin, and presence of active connective tissue disease. All patients had provided written informed consent before assigned to treatment, and according to the St. Gallen Consensus Conference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref13">13</xref>] low risk patients was started RT immediately after BCS while in high risk patients; RT was started sequentially after chemotherapy.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Systemic Therapy</title><p>Patients with tumor size &gt;1 cm or with lymph node involvement received chemotherapy. Patients with positive estrogen or progesterone receptors received hormonal therapy after end of RT and/or chemotherapy while those with HER-2 positive received trastuzumab.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Radiotherapy</title><p>The patients were planned with CT scan and CT cuts were performed in the supine position, using breast board, transferred to planning system (Precise Plan), 3D breast planning was done with two tangential fields using of 6 MV photon. CTV include whole breast tissue, CTV boost includes the tumour bed with clips inside or the area of seroma if clips not present with 5 mm margin to create PTV. Irradiation to supraclavicular L.N was done when indicated. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The radiation dose is 40 Gy total dose in 15 fractions for whole breast and additional dose of 9 Gy in three consecutive fractions was delivered tumour cavity simultaneously.</p><p>Follow-up of the patients was carried out weekly during RT and monthly after that till 3 months after RT to</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> CTV &amp; PTV of the breast and tumor bed with clips in the tumor bed</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2470124x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Two tangential fields arrangement for PTV</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2470124x8.png"/></fig><p>evaluate acute toxicity. Then every 3 months to evaluate late toxicity or local recurrence for first year then every 6 months for 2 years then yearly. The RTOG/EORTG scoring system for radiation reactions were used to score radiation toxicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref14">14</xref>] . Local DFS was calculated from date of diagnosis of ipsilateral tumor recurrence either invasive or insitu carcinoma in the operated breast or overlying skin.</p><p>The primary end points were acute and late radiation reactions while the secondary end-point was ipsilateral tumor recurrence.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Patients, tumor and treatment characteristics are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Mean age was 52 years (range; 30 - 67), most patients were of stage II disease. Grade II was the most common. Invasive ductal carcinoma was reported in 94.4% and 72.2% of patients were hormone receptor positive.</p><p>After median follow-up of 52 months; all patients were alive and ipsilateral local recurrence was reported in 1 case only.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Patients characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Character</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean (range)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 (30 - 67) years</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >II</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grading</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >II</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >III</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Histology</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Invasive ductal</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Invasive lobular</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medullary</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hormonal status</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ER and/or PR positive</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ER and/or PR negative</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chemotherapy</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HER-2 receptor</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Negative</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>Acute Radiation Reactions<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>; no grade IV acute radiation toxicity was observed. Moist desquamation was the most common one (61%) with grade III in 5.5% followed by dry desquamation in 55.6% of grade I only. Grade I erythema was recorded in 41.7% and grade II in 11%.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> showed the incidence of late radiation reactions. No grade IV toxicity and grade III telengectesia occurred in 3 patients (8.3%) only. Fibrosis was the most frequent one (44.3%) with grade II in 11% followed by telengectesia then pigmentation (41.7%, 33.3% respectively).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Based on radiobiological models, it was found that shorter radiation schedules offer the promise of equivalent local control to standard radiation therapy by giving larger doses per fraction in shorter period of time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref15">15</xref>] . Our study demonstrated local recurrence in 1 case only but it is very early to make conclusion about this parameter at this time as longer follow-up period and larger number of patients are needed.</p><p>Our study revealed reasonably good feasibility in terms of acute toxicity as no grade IV reaction was found and grade III was reported in 3.3% only which is comparable to other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref16">16</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>Results of retrospective studies of hypofractionated RT in early breast cancer suggest satisfactory outcomes as regard tumor control and late adverse events [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>The initial our results of late effects appears promising as no grade IV toxicity and grade III telengectesia in 8.3% and higher percentage of reactions was of grade I. Fibrosis was the most frequent occurred late event, this</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Acute radiation toxicity</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Grade</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Toxicity</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >IV</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >III</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >II</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >I</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Radiation pneumonitis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Erythema</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry desquamation</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moist desquamation</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Late radiation toxicity</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Grade</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Toxicity</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >IV</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >III</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >II</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >I</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Radiation pneumonitis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fibrosis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pigmentation</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Telengectasia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pain</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>is similar to that reported by Guenzi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref21">21</xref>] . Ciammella et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref22">22</xref>] and Scorsetti et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67542-ref23">23</xref>] also concluded that 3-week hypofractionated postoperative radiotherapy with boost is safe and acute toxicity is acceptable.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The regimen used in this study appears promising with acceptable acute toxicities and convenient for our patients and has the advantage of economic use of radiation facilities as well as saving time in our busy radiotherapy units. However, larger number of patients and longer period of follow-up are needed for further evaluation.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Hend Ahmed El-Hadaad,Hanan Ahmed Wahba,Waleed Elnahas,Sameh Roshdy, (2016) Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy after Conservative Breast Surgery in Early Breast Cancer. Advances in Breast Cancer Research,05,97-102. doi: 10.4236/abcr.2016.53011</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.67542-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(2010) Landlijke werkgroep behandeling van het mammacarcinoom. Accessed 4 September.  
http://www.oncoline.nl/index.php?pagina=/richtlijn/item/pagina.php&amp;id=27539&amp;richtlijn_id=593</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clarke, M., Collins, R., Darby, S., et al. (2005) Effects of Radiotherapy and of Differences in the Extent of Surgery for Early Breast Cancer on Local Recurrence and 15-Year Survival: An Overview of the Randomized Trials. The Lancet, 366, 2087-2106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scorsetti, M., Alongi, F., Fogliata, A., et al. (2012) Phase I-II Study of Hypofractionated Simultaneous Integrated Boost Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients: A Report of Feasibility and Early Toxicity Results in the First 50 Treatments. Radiotherapy &amp; Oncology, 28, 145.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ciammella, P., Podgornii, A., Galeandro, M., et al. (2014) Toxicity and Cosmetic Outcome of Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Radiotherapy: Predictive Clinical and Dosimetric Factors. Radiotherapy &amp; Oncology, 9, 97.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-97</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guenzi, M., Vagge, S., Azinwi, N.C., et al. (2010) A Biologically Competitive 21 Days Hypofractionation Scheme with Weekly Concomitant Boost in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Feasibility Acute Sub-Acute and Short Term Late Effects. Radiotherapy &amp; Oncology, 5, 111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-5-111</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shelly, W., Brundage, M., Hayter, C., et al. (2000) A Shorter Fractionation Schedule for Post Lumpectomy Breast Cancer Patients. International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics, 47, 1219-1228.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00567-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olivotto, I.A., Weir, L.M., Kim-Sing, C., et al. (1996) Late Cosmetic Results of Short Fractionation for Breast Conservation. Radiotherapy &amp; Oncology, 41, 7-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(96)91824-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fujii, O., Hiratsuka, J., Nagase, N., et al. (2008) Whole Breast Radiotherapy with Shorter Fractionation Schedules Following Breast-Conserving Surgery: Short-Term Morbidity and Preliminary Outcomes. Breast Cancer, 15, 86-92. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12282-007-0010-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Corvo, R., Giudici, S., Maggio, F., et al. (2008) Weekly Concomitant Boost in Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results on Feasibility. Tumori, 94, 706-711.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jalali, R., Malde, R., Bhutani, R., et al. (2008) Prospective Evaluation of Concomitant Tumor Bed Boost with Whole Breast Irradiation in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Therapy. Breast, 17, 64-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fowler, J.F. (1989) The Linear-Quadratic Formula and Progress in Fractionated Radiotherapy. The British Journal of Radiology, 62, 679-694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-62-740-679</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cox, J.D., Stetz, J. and Pajak, T.F. (1995) Toxicity Criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics, 31, 1041-1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(2005) Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer. 9th International Conference on Breast, Volume 14, St Gallen, Switzerland, 26-29 January 2005, S1-S56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15776545</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van der Laan, H.P., Dolsma, W.V., Maduro, J.H., et al. (2007) Three-Dimensional Conformal Simultaneously Integrated Boost Technique for Breast-Conserving Radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics, 68, 1018-1023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guerrero, M., Li, X.A., Earl, M.A., et al. (2004) Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Breast Cancer Using IMRT: A Radiobiological and Treatment Planning Study. International Journal of Radiation Oncology * Biology * Physics, 59, 1513-1522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Whelan, T., Pigno, J., Levine, M., et al. (2010) Long-Term Results of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine, 362, 513-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0906260</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bentzen, S.M., Agrawal, R.K., Aird, E.G., et al., START Trialists Group (2008) The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial B of Radiotherapy Hypofractionation for Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: A Randomized trial. The Lancet Oncology, 371, 1098-1107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60348-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bentzen, S.M., Agrawal, R.K., Aird, E.G., et al., START Trialists Group (2008) The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of Radiotherapy Hypofractionation for Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: A Randomized trial. The Lancet Oncology, 9, 331-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70077-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barton, M.B., Frommer, M. and Shafiq, J. (2006) Role of Radiotherapy in Cancer Control in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries. The Lancet Oncology, 7, 584-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70759-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zubizarreta, E.H., Poitevin, A. and Levin, C.V. (2004) Overview of Radiotherapy Resourses in Latin America: A Survey by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiotherapy &amp; Oncology, 73, 97-100.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2004.07.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ballard-Barbash, R., Potosky, A.L., Harlan, L.C., et al. (1996) Factors Associated with Surgical and Radiation Therapy for Early Breast Cancer in Older Women. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 88, 716-726.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/88.11.716</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">van der Laan, H.P., Hurkmans, C.W., Kuten, A., et al. (2010) Current Technological Clinical Practice in Breast Radiotherapy; Results of a Survey in EORTC-Radiation Oncology Group Affiliated Institutions. Radiotherapy &amp; Oncology, 94, 280-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2009.12.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67542-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fisher, B., Anderson, S., Bryant, J., et al. (2002) Twenty-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy and Lumpectomy Plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine, 347, 1233-1241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022152</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>