<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1945-3094</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2016.87059</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP-67491</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Reciprocal Analysis of Sensible and Latent Heat Fluxes in a Forest Region Using Single Height Temperature and Humidity Based on the Bowen Ratio Concept
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Toshisuke</surname><given-names>Maruyama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Manabu</surname><given-names>Segawa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculity of Environmental Science, Ishikawa Prefectural University, Ishikawa, Japan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>maruyama@ishikawa-pu.ac.jp(TM)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>06</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>724</fpage><lpage>742</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>26</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>17</month>	<year>June</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Evapotranspiration in forests has been researched for a long time because it serves an important role in water resource issues and biomass production. By applying the reciprocal analysis based on the Bowen ratio concept to the canopy surface, the sum result of sensible and latent heat fluxes, 
  i.e., actual evapotranspiration (
  ET), is estimated from engineering aspect using the net radiation (
  Rn) and heat flux into the ground (
  G). The new method uses air temperature and humidity at a single height by determining the relative humidity (
  rehs) using the canopy temperature (
  Ts). The validity of the method is confirmed by the latent heat flux (
  lE) and sensible heat flux (
  H) observed by mean of eddy covariance method. The heat imbalance is corrected by multiple regression analysis. The temporal change of 
  lE and
   H at the canopy surface is clarified using hourly and yearly data. Furthermore, the observed and estimated monthly evapotranspiration of the sites are compared. The research is conducted using hourly data and the validation of the method is conducted using observed covariance at five sites in the world using FLUXNET.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Bowen Ratio</kwd><kwd> Eddy Covariance</kwd><kwd> Reciprocal Determination</kwd><kwd> Estimation of Evapotranspiration</kwd><kwd> Canopy Surface Temperature and Humidity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Reasonable water resource planning requires estimation of actual evapotranspiration. Many relevant research projects have provided useful results; however, the research is still incomplete. Existing research uses theoretical, observational (eddy covariance and Bowen ratio methods), and experimental approaches (the complementary relationship method). All of the above approaches are based on aerodynamic theory, including the heat balance approach, but excluding the complementary relationship.</p><p>The eddy covariance method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67491-ref1">1</xref>] is very useful for estimating evapotranspiration. Latent heat flux (lE) has been observed directly by the eddy covariance method, but the heat balance relationship sometimes is not guaranteed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67491-ref2">2</xref>] . On the other hand, the value of eddy covariance represents only the sensible heat flux (H); therefore, the latent heat flux (lE) must be estimated to determine by the heat imbalance. Unfortunately, the observation sites of eddy covariance are rarely included in common climate observations although evapotranspiration remarkably affected by regional ecosystem and local climate elements.</p><p>In contrast, the Bowen ratio method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67491-ref3">3</xref>] is commonly used, but its evaluation requires the air temperature and humidity at least two heights. Unfortunately, two heights are rarely included in common climate observations despite their usefulness.</p><p>The complementary relationship method is based on the hypothesis that the actual plus potential evapotranspiration is twice the equilibrium evaporation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67491-ref4">4</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67491-ref6">6</xref>] . However, the method has a limited ability to evaluate the equilibrium evaporation state. The method sometimes uses an empirical coefficient [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67491-ref7">7</xref>] , but this constant is still unclear because it varies by location.</p><p>In the natural world, the air temperature and humidity is determined by H and lE from the net radiation (Rn) and heat flux into the ground (G). Thus, our research attempts the reciprocal estimation of H and lE from the not observed humidity (rehs) while satisfying the heat balance relationship using the canopy surface temperature (Ts). The concept is different from that of the other relevant methods, and it only requires Rn, G and common climate measurements, including the air temperature and humidity at a single height.</p><p>In the proposed method, the unknown variables, relative humidity at the canopy surface (rehs) were determined reciprocally with keeping heat balance relationship by the non-linear optimization technique known as the general reduced gradient (GRG) attached in the Excel Solver (Appendix 1).</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Theoretical Background</title><sec id="s2_1_1"><title>2.1.1. Fundamental Concept of the Model</title><p>The proposed model considers the above of near-canopy as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Net radiation moves from the air to the canopy and soil surface, and it is portioned into sensible, latent and underground fluxes. Ts is the canopy surface temperature including plant zone, Tz is the air temperature above the canopy at height z, q (Tz) is the specific moisture at height z, rehz is the relative humidity in air at height z, q (Ts) is the unsaturated specific moisture on the canopy surface including plant zone, and q<sub>sat</sub> (Ts) is the saturated specific moisture at the same height of q (Ts). In addition, the meaning of observed Tz and rehz in the method describe in discussion section.</p><p>The fundamental formulae of the model satisfy the following well known heat balance relationship [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67491-ref3">3</xref>] . The relationship, i.e., energy conservation theorem, is a fundamental concept in the natural world that must be guaranteed at anywhere and anytime.</p><p>Heat balance relationship:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67491-formula728"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402876x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here, Rn is the net radiation flux (W∙m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>), G is the heat flux into the canopy and ground (W∙m<sup>−2</sup>), H is the sensible heat flux (W∙m<sup>−2</sup>), and lE is the latent heat flux (W∙m<sup>−2</sup>). In addition, although there is heat flux stored in the canopy and plant zone, the effect of stored heat flux appeared on G, Ts and rehs.</p><p>On the other hand, the Bowen ratio (H∙lE<sup>−1</sup>) is defined as follows with assuming continuity relationship of the H and lE between two heights [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67491-ref3">3</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67491-formula729"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402876x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We apply the relationship on the canopy zone (including plant zone) as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, i.e., the Bowen ratio con- cept is applied to the layer between the canopy zone and the observation height of the air temperature and humidity by assuming Ts and q (Ts). The reason is as follows: The Ts and q (Ts) in the canopy zone are usually</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Component of the model and the relevant symbols</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402876x9.png"/></fig><p>unknown and difficult to observe. If we try to observe, the observation position usually can’t be specify. This application results in the following:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67491-formula730"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402876x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The specific moisture on the canopy zone is expressed as follows as a function of Ts:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67491-formula731"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402876x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here, l is the latent heat flux of evaporation (kJ∙kg<sup>−1</sup>), Cp is the specific heat of the air at a constant pressure (1.004 kJ∙kg<sup>−1</sup>∙K<sup>−1</sup>).</p><p>According to the above definition of Ts and rehs, the two items are somewhat symbolic and comprehensive concept that did not specify the position. The other variables in Equation (3) and Equation (4) can be expressed by the following well-known equations:</p><p>Saturated specific moisture:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67491-formula732"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402876x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Saturated vapor pressure:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67491-formula733"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402876x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Latent heat flux of evaporation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67491-formula734"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402876x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where P is the atmospheric pressure (hPa).</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_2"><title>2.1.2. Governing Equation for Determining the Unknown Variables by the Proposed Method</title><p>The purpose of the optimization is to determine the unknown variables Ts and q (Ts) in Equation (3) without measurements, but with Ts sometimes observed. The governing equation to be solved is obtained by inserting Equation (3) into Equation (1). Initially, if Ts was observed, rehs is only assumed because</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402876x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Equation (1) is not as closed as Equation (8) because of the assumptions for rehs. The equation is expressed as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67491-formula735"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402876x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The objective function is ε<sub>i</sub> that goes to a minimum by repeating calculation using Equation (8) and Equation (3) in the optimization process.</p><p>The rehs can be unified mathematically because a governing Equation (8) determined a variable rehs.</p><p>After optimization completed, i.e., B<sub>est</sub> in Equation (3) goes to B<sub>0</sub>, lE and H can be obtained as follows.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.67491-formula736"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402876x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The equation is nonlinear for Ts and q (Ts). Thus, an analytical solution is not available. Therefore, a numerical method was applied. Note that the other factors were obtained from observations or calculated independently using the aforementioned relationships. In addition, the analysis was conducted essentially using hourly data and summarized daily because the climate element change remarkably throughout a day.</p><p>The rehs in Equation (4) for estimating q (Ts) was assumed initially to be rehz because the humidity on the canopy has not remarkably different. The rehs was automatically modified.</p><p>The calculation follows a non-linear optimization procedure that employs a General reduced Gradient (GRG) algorithm, which can be applied with the Excel Solver on a personal computer (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Investigation Site and Equipment</title><p>To examine the validity of proposed method, five sites were chosen throughout the world as identified in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>: one site in Japan, China and Europe and two sites in the USA. The data of all sites were prepared by FLUXNET [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67491-ref8">8</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67491-ref12">12</xref>] . <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the name of the sites, country, state/province, location, elevation, vegetation, tower height, canopy height and year of data examination. The examined year was chosen to minimize the data gaps.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> describes the type of applied instruments with the variables of the heat balance components, unit and description of those measurements, including soil temperature (To) measurement depth Tx. The temperature Ts is obtained by calculation from observed RglOut by radiometer that is setting at higher position than the canopy height. Therefore, the Ts represent the temperature not only canopy surface but also inside of canopy including ground surface.</p></sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>2.3. Heat Balance Relationship at the Observed Sites</title>
<p>To investigate the accuracy of observed data, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> describes the heat balance relationship of observations at the tested sites expressed in heat flux. The imbalance was estimated by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402876x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> using yearly data and an imbalance ratio defined as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402876x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The Ra<sub>imb</sub> ranged from −0.05 (US-Slt) to 0.37 (CN-Cha) with an average of 0.16 (the upper low of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> in each of the sites). Especially, although the coefficient for H at CN-Cha show remarkably different of the other sites. The results are almost the same as those of Wilson’s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67491-ref13">13</xref>] . The annual precipitation of the examined year is also shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Features of the tested sites</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sitename/FLUXNET ID:</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FR-Pue</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >JP-Tom</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CN-Cha</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >US-Slt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >US-WCr</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Country:</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >France</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Japan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >China</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >USA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >USA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >State/Province:</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Herault</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hokkaido</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antu County, Jilin Province</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >New Jersey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wisconsin</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Latitude (+N/−S):</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.7414</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.737</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.4025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.9137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.806</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Longitude (+E/−W):</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5958</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.5186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128.0958</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−74.5960</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−90.0798</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Elevation:</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >211 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >736 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >515 m</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vegetation (IGBP):</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Evergreen Broadleaf Forests</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Japanese larch forest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pinus-koraiensis-dominanted Pinus koraiensis broad-leafed mixed forest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Deciduous broadleaf forest</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Deciduous broadleaf forest</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tower height:</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >about 42 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >about 40 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 m</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Canopy height:</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.52 &#177; 2.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Data available</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2008 1/1-12/31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2003 1/1-12/31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2005 1/1-12/31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2012 1/1-12/31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2005 1/1-12/31</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec></body>
<back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.67491-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kondo, J. (1996) Meteorology on Water Environment, 5. Wind and Its Turbulence near Soil Surface. Asakura Publishing Ltd., Tokyo, 99-127.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Allen, R. (2008) Quality Assessment of Weather Data and Micrometeorological Flux Impact on Evapotranspiration Calculation. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology, 64, 191-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.2480/agrmet.64.4.5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kondo, J. (1996) Meteorology on Water Environment, 6. Water and Heat Balance on Soil Surface. Asakura Publishing Ltd., Tokyo, 128-159.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Morton</surname><given-names> F.I. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1978</year>)<article-title>Estimating Evapotranspiration from Potential Evaporation</article-title><source> Journal of Hydrology</source><volume> 38</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>32</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brutsaert, W. and Striker, H. (1979) An Advection Aridity Approach to Estimate Actual Regional Evapotranspiration, Water Resources Reseach, 15, 443-450.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otsuki, K., Mitsuno, T. and Maruyama, T. (1984) Comparison between Water Budget and Complementary Relationship Estimates of Catchment Evapotranspiration Studies on the Estimation of actual Evapotranspiration (II). Transactions of The Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Reclamation Engineering, 112, 17-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Preistley, C.H.B. and Taylor, R.J. (1972) On the Assessment oh Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters. Monthly Weather Review, 100, 81-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100&lt;0081:OTAOSH&gt;2.3.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rambal, S. and Ourcival, J.-M. (2008) Puechabon (FR-Pue) European Fluxes Database Cluster L2 Data. http://gaia.agraria.unitus.it/home/data/request-data</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saigusa, N., Hirata, R. and Hirano, T. (2002) Tomakomai Flux Research Site (TMK), AsiaFlux Data. https://db.cger.nies.go.jp/asiafluxdb/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guan, D.X., Zhang, J.H. and Wu, J.B. (2005) Changbaishan Site (CBS) AsiaFlux Data. https://db.cger.nies.go.jp/asiafluxdb/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clark, K.L. (2012) Silas Little Experimental Forest (US-Slt) AmeriFlux L2 Data.http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/programs/ameriflux/data_system/aaSilas_Little_Experimental_Forest_pf.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bolstad, Paul, Desai, Ankur (2005) Willow Creek (US-WCr) AmeriFlux L2 Data.http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/programs/ameriflux/data_system/aaWillow_Creek_pf.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wilson, K., Goldstein, A., Falge, E., Abbinet, M., Baldocchi, D., Berbingier, C., Ceulemans, R., Dolman, H., Field, C., Grelle, A., Ibrom, A., Law, B., Kowalski, A., Meyers, T., Moncrieff, J., Monson, R., Oechel, W., Tenhunen, J., Valentini, R. and Verma, S. (2002) Energy Balance Closure at FLUXNET Sites. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 113, 223-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00109-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Twine, T.E., Kustas, W.P., Norman, J.M., Cook, D.R., Houser, P.R., Meyers, T.P., Prueger, J.H., Staks, P.J. and Wesely, M.L. (2000) Correcting Eddy-Covariance Flux under Estimates over a Grassland. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 103, 279-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(00)00123-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kondo, J. (2015) Heat Balance and Climate on Soil Surface. http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~rk7j-kndu/kenkyu/ke03.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Urano S.-I. (2012) Study on Bowen Ratios in the Penman and Priestly&amp;#183Taylor Equations. Geophysical Bulletin of Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 15, 91-107.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67491-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frank, J.M., William, J.M, Edoward, S., Herb, A.Z. and Brent, E.E. (2016) All Sonic Anemometers Need to Correct for Transducer and Structural Shadowing in Their Velocity Measurement. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 33, 149-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0171.1</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>