Waste stream characteristics must be understood to tackle waste management problem in Tripoli city, Libya. It is recognized that information on both quantity and composition of generation waste is important for the effective planning of household waste handling infrastructure. So, this study is aimed to evaluating the generation, composition and density of household solid waste in Tripoli city, Libya. The study is carried out according to the Annex 2.1 of: WHO 1996. It was conducted during one week in summer, autumn and winter 2011/2012. The daily household solid waste generation assessment has been carried out for 150 Libyan families where 947 people in three main parts of Tripoli city have been chosen randomly. A questionnaire was prepared according to Buenrostro
et al. 2001 and Raje
et al. 2001 using door-to-door surveying. The result showed that the average of total generation quantity, daily generation rate, total volume and density were 1415 kg, 0.64 kg/person/day, 19.3 m
3 and 74.4 kg/m
3 respectively in Tripoli city. Household solid waste contains 36.3% organic matter and 32.5% recyclable materials (glass, paper, plastic, metals). The total generation quantity, daily generation rate, total volume and density were in Tripoli city agreed with those for African and Arabic countries. But the problem is that Tripoli suffers from insufficient municipal solid waste management and lack of sanitary landfills.
Solid waste has been produced since the beginning of civilization. During the earliest periods, solid wastes were conveniently and unobtrusively disposed of in large open land spaces, as the density of the population was low. As a result of rapid urbanization and changes in consumption of many cities in developing countries, waste generation has increased. However, the waste generated is, in most cases, not properly managed. Hence, this has huge consequences in terms of collection, disposal and the elimination of waste [1] [2] . However, today, one of the consequences of global urbanization is an increased amount of solid waste. About 1.3 × 109 t of municipal solid waste (MSW) was generated globally in 1990 [3] , and, at present, the annual generation is approximately 1.6 × 109 t. The urban population in Asia generates around 760 × 103 t of MSW per day, and this is expected to increase to 1.8 × 106 t by 2025 [4] [5] . In almost all developing countries, city solid waste constitutes a hazard, be it from the ecological point of view or the public health point of view. Almost everywhere, there is a distinct lack of policy on efficient waste collection and a total absence of its treatment [2] . Many experts from various cities in developing countries have expressed serious concerns about improper waste treatment and disposal in these countries [4] [6] - [9] . In most developing countries, solid waste management is undertaken by the local authorities. These services include waste collection (either from households or district collection points) to final disposal. However, the low financial base and human resource capacity of these local authorities means that in most cases they are only able to provide a limited service [7] . Inadequate management of solid waste in most cities of developing countries leads to problems that impair human and animal health and ultimately result in economic, environmental and biological losses [9] - [11] . The quantity of municipal solid waste generated depends on a number of factors such as food habits, standard of living, with increasing urbanization and changing life styles, degree of commercial activities and seasons. A number of socioeconomic variables may affect the quantity of solid waste generated each day by a household. These include religion, family size, family employment, age, education; land status and duration of stay [9] [12] [13] . Data on quantity variation and generation are useful in planning for collection and disposal systems [9] . Today waste is also produced as a result of society’s attempt to solve other environmental problems such as water and air pollution. Some of these increasing amounts of waste give rise to new problems, such as sewage sludge and residues from cleaning of flue gases [14] . Solid waste management has several functional elements, including waste generation, waste handling and separation, storage and processing, collection, transfer and transport, and final disposal [1] . Solid waste management refers to all activities pertaining to the control, collection, transportation, processing and disposal of waste in accordance with the best principles of public health, economics, engineering, conservation, aesthetics and other environmental considerations. Its scope includes all attendant administrative, financial, legal, planning and engineering functions. To achieve the objectives of solid waste management and to overcome its problems, [12] proper management (storage, collection, and disposal) of solid waste requires accurate information regarding waste-generation rates, and quantities, composition, sources, and locations of waste. This type of information was not available for the cities in Libya. No studies were conducted on solid waste management in the past. There are no records indicating the amount of various types of waste collected and the volumes of waste generated per capita. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the household solid waste generation, composition and density in Tripoli city in Libya as first step should lead to a better understanding of the solid waste management problems in Libya and estimate the effects of some socioeconomic factors on solid waste generation.
2. Place of Study
Tripoli is the capital city and the largest city of Libya. As of 2011, the Tripoli metropolitan area (district area) had a population of 2.2 million people. The city is located in the northwestern part of Libya on the edge of the desert, on a point of rocky land projecting into the Mediterranean and forming a bay. This study was conducted in three main parts of Tripoli city which have been chosen randomly.
3. Preparations
The areas of study (area1, area 2 and area 3) have chosen according to the type of houses (old fashion houses, flats and modern houses) to be representing the low income, middle income and high income levels respectively. Equipment and collection route have been determined. Box volume has been measured and the workers instructed as to how should carry out their work. The plastic bags distributed in study areas.
4. Procedure of Study
The first phase of study carried out according to the Annex 2.1of: WHO (1996) [14] . Therefore, the plastic bags from houses collected according to the pre-specified collection route from (area1, area 2 and area 3) to the dump site where all measurements have been conducted. Each plastic bag weighed and recorded the weight in the data sheet according to the numbers assigned to households. 10 - 15 plastic bags chosen randomly of each sample area then opened and emptied in the boxes of volume unit it became full and then emptied, spread on the plastic sheet. Wastes separated into different types, weighted and recorded to be a composition of household wastes by weight. The volume of generated household solid waste measured by empting all plastic bags in the boxes and counting the number of boxes to be the total volume. This procedure repeated every day /week in summer, autumn and winter 2011/2012.
In the second phase of the study, a questionnaire survey was carried out on 150 randomly selected houses in various areas in the city. A questionnaire was prepared according to Raje et al. 2001 [15] and Buenrostro et al. 2001 [16] using door-to-door surveying in order to obtain data about household solid waste quantity, daily disposal, availability of containers, collection frequency and satisfaction level, etc. The data collected from the survey was analyzed using Microsoft Excel for calculating simple statistics.
5. Results and Discussion
From the data of collecting questionnaire, the responsive percentage to the study was 100% whereas 150 questionnaires have been distributed and collected in study places and the number of people was 947. Table 1 explains the concluding data. On the other side, the information about household solid waste services refers to, all chosen families in area 1 pay about 15 - 20 ?month for private companies for solid waste services twice a week and they are almost satisfy, and they prefer local services but there is no government company serving in this side of Tripoli. 50% of families produce 7 - 10 garbage bag per week, 30% producing 4 - 6 bags per week and 20% producing 0 - 3 bags. All chosen families in area 2 didn’t pay for private companies of solid waste services. 43% of families produce 7 - 10 garbage bag per week, 36% producing 4 - 6 bags per week and 21% producing 0 - 3 bags. 40% of chosen families in area 3 didn’t pay for private companies of solid waste services and 60% are paying. 60% of families produce 7 - 10 garbage bag per week, 30% producing 4 - 6 bags per week and 10% producing 0 - 3 bags.
6. Household Solid Waste Generation, Volume and Density in Places of Study
In order to determine generation, volume and density in places of study approximately 4650 kg household solid waste were collected from 150 Libyan families representing some 947 persons in (area1, area 2 and area 3) at Tripoli city during one week in summer, autumn and winter 2011/2012. From Table 2, the results shown that the total generation quantity, daily generation rate, total volume and density were 1464.5 kg, 0.66 kg/person/day, 19.73 m3 and 74.7 kg/m3 respectively in Tripoli city.
Comparisons between the Tripoli city results and those for African and Arabic countries, the generation rate agreed with All Arabic countries [17] , and Cameroon, Burkina Faso, Guinea, Namibia, Senegal and Zimbabwe [18] but it is higher than 0.39 reported in Allahabad, India [19] , 0.23 kg in Beijing [20] , 0.55 kg in Abuja [21] , 0.59 kg in Mexican city [22] , and the 0.4 kg in Dares Salaam [23] , but it is less than the 1.1 kg reported in Lagos [24] and 0.84 in Lahore city, Pakistan [25] .
Families characteristic
Gender
Male
Female
417
530
Age (year)
Under 6 (yr)
15 - 20
21 - 25
26 - 35
36 - 55
>55
133
216
130
111
300
57
Education
High school
Diploma
College
Postgraduate
Students
Non
94
163
213
25
429
23
Income (LYD)
≤300
301 - 500
501 - 1000
1000 - 2000
>2000
33
326
127
28
14
Occupation
Housewife
Student
Teachers
Self employed
Employee
Retired
98
429
128
77
200
15
7. Household Solid Waste Generation According to the Family Size
The analysis of the 150 sample observations in the study areas indicates that an average household in the Tripoli Area generated 0.7 kg of wastes per day. It also reveals that the rate of waste generation varies in the different places studied, as shown in Tables 2-5, the waste generation rate was found to be 0.59 and 0.74 kg/capita/day in
Average values of Tripoli city
Value
Summer
Autumn
Winter
Average
Total
Quantity
1563.7
1318.2
1511.7
1464.5
(kg)
Generation rate
0.7
0.59
0.69
0.66
(kg/person/day)
Volume (m3)
20.7
18
20.48
19.73
Density (kg/m3)
75
74.7
74
74.7
Average values of Tripoli household solid waste during summer
Value
Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Average
Total quantity (kg)
1572.1
1460.4
1760.5
1563.7
Generation rate (kg/person/day)
0.59
0.74
0.78
0.7
Volume (m3)
19.2
18.9
24
20.7
Density (kg/m3)
74.3
77.4
73.3
75
Average values of Tripoli household solid waste during autumn
Value
Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Average
Total quantity (kg)
1280
1062.7
1611.8
1318.2
Generation rate (kg/person/day)
0.53
0.54
0.71
0.59
Volume (m3)
17.8
14.4
21.6
18
Density (kg/m3)
71.8
73.8
74.6
74.7
Average values of Tripoli household solid waste during winter
Value
Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Average
Total quantity (kg)
1378
1444.9
1712.1
1511.7
Generation rate (kg/person/day)
0.57
0.74
0.76
0.69
Volume (m3)
18.2
20.2
23
20.5
Density (kg/m3)
75.8
71.7
74.5
74
Solid waste generation according to the income level
Income value
Number of persons
Days
Total
Generation rate
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
≤300
60
4.9
4.19
4.73
4.3
4.83
4.89
4.92
34
0.56
301 - 500
45
1.83
2.61
3.83
4.34
5.04
5.42
5.8
28.87
0.64
501 - 1000
37
1.91
2.77
3.92
4.41
5.17
5.67
5.92
29.77
0.8
1000 - 2000
35
1.99
2.87
3.93
4.6
5.37
5.85
6.15
30.76
0.88
>2000
30
2.01
2.94
4.11
4.94
5.64
6.03
6.87
32.54
1.08
207
155.94
0.75
Solid waste generation according to the family size
Family size
Number of persons
Days
total
Generation rate
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
≤3
19
1.83
1.99
2
2.01
1.91
1.91
1.99
13.64
0.72
4
28
2.87
2.87
2.9
2.75
2.91
2.90
2.61
19.9
0.70
5
50
4.98
4.11
4.93
4.1
4.83
4.89
4.92
34
0.68
6
42
3.34
4.6
4.5
4.94
4.89
4.51
4.41
32.2
0.67
7
56
5.42
5.44
5.64
5.37
5.17
5.04
5.17
37.3
0.66
8
64
6.03
5.67
5.85
5.88
5.92
5.42
5.75
40.52
0.63
>8
67
6.87
6.53
6.17
5.88
5.92
6.15
6.25
40.77
0.61
326
31.34
31.21
31.99
30.93
31.55
30.82
31.1
218.3
0.67
Household solid waste composition in Tripoli city in summer
Category
%
Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Average
Food
13.5
15.3
5
11.3
Vegetables
8.1
10
6.7
8.3
Bones
2.7
3
5
3.6
Fruits skin
7
10
8.3
8.4
Bread litter
6.2
3
5
4.7
Paper
12
14
20
15.3
Textiles
14
8.6
12
11.5
Plastic
20
18.2
17.6
18.6
Glass
4.1
3.2
3.1
3.5
Metals
8.4
4.7
7.2
6.7
others
4
10
10.1
8
total
100
100
100
100
Household solid waste composition in Tripoli city in autumn
Category
%
Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Average
Food
11.5
14.1
7.8
11.1
Vegetables
6.5
11.2
8.8
8.8
Bones
2.5
2.2
4.8
3.2
Fruits skin
3.2
4.1
6.2
4.5
Bread litter
5.4
3.4
4.7
4.5
Paper
15.6
15.6
18.2
16.5
Textiles
12.5
10
8.3
10.3
Plastic
18.7
18
19
18.6
Glass
5.3
5.1
7.2
5.8
Metals
9.8
5.1
8
7.8
others
9
11.2
7
9.1
total
100
100
100
100
Household solid waste composition in Tripoli city in winter
Category
%
Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Average
Food
10.7
13.6
10
11.4
Vegetables
7.6
9.3
9.2
8.7
Bones
3.5
5.1
6.2
5
Fruits skin
4.7
7.3
7
6.1
Bread litter
7.5
2.2
5.1
5
Paper
11.2
14.7
16.4
14.1
Textiles
15.1
11.3
12
12.8
Plastic
16.2
20.5
22
19.6
Glass
4.5
4.2
1.8
3.5
Metals
7.8
4.3
5.3
5.8
others
11.2
7.5
5
7.9
total
100
100
100
100
Household solid waste composition in Tripoli city
Category
%
Summer
Autumn
Winter
Average
Food
11.3
11.1
11.4
11.3
Vegetables
8.3
8.8
8.7
8.6
Bones
3.6
3.2
5
4
Fruits skin
8.4
4.5
6.1
6.3
Bread litter
4.7
4.5
5
4.7
Paper
15.3
16.5
14.1
15.3
Textiles
11.5
10.3
12.8
11.5
Plastic
18.6
18.6
19.6
18.9
Glass
3.5
5.8
3.5
4.3
Metals
6.7
7.8
5.8
6.8
others
8
9.1
7.9
8.3
total
100
100
100
100
Household solid waste composition in Tripoli city (%)
Category
Summer
Autumn
Winter
Average
Organic matter
37.5
41.3
30
36.3
Paper
12
14
20
15.3
Textiles
14
8.6
12
11.5
Plastic
20
18.2
17.6
18.6
Glass
4.1
3.2
3.1
3.5
Metals
8.4
4.7
7.2
6.7
Other
4
10
10.1
8
total
100
100
100
100
area 1 and area 2 respectively and 0.78 kg/capita/day in area 3. The generation of household waste was found to be positively correlated with family size Table 4, which means families with more individuals generate a larger quantity of solid waste per day, the income level of family was also found to be positively correlated and the generation of solid waste, which reveals that families earning more per month have the tendency to generate a larger quantity of solid waste each day Table 6. An inverse correlation was found between the waste generation rate and families size as apparent in Table 7.
8. Composition of Household Solid Waste
In order to estimate the composition of household solid waste in Tripoli, 178.5 kg, 180.7 kg and 176.1 kg in summer, 168.3 kg, 180.1 kg and 169.4 kg in autumn and 173.5 kg, 183.7 kg and 179.1 kg in winter of waste mixed samples from (area 1, area 2 and area 3) were separated as groups and weighted. The results of the analyses show that household solid waste contains 36.3% organic matter as shown in Tables 8-12. The percentage of recyclable materials (glass, paper, plastic, metals) was 32.5%.
Cite this paper
Walid A. S. Moftah,Dragan Marković,Omar A. S. Moftah,Layth Nesseef, (2016) Characterization of Household Solid Waste and Management in Tripoli City—Libya. Open Journal of Ecology,06,435-442. doi: 10.4236/oje.2016.67041
ReferencesMoghadam, M.R.A., Mokhtarani, N. and Mokhtarani, B. (2009) Municipal Solid Waste Management in Rasht City, Iran. Waste Management, 29, 485-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.029Philippe, F. and Culot, M. (2009) Household Solid Waste Generation and Characteristics in Cape Haitian city, Republic of Haiti. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 54, 73-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.06.009Beede, D.N. and Bloom, D.E. (1995) The Economics of Municipal Solid Waste. World Bank Research Observer, 10, 113-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wbro/10.2.113Pokhrel, D. and Viraraghavan, T. (2005) Municipal Solid Waste Management in Nepal: Practices and Challenges. Waste Management, 25, 555-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.01.020Chattopadhyay, S., Dutta, A. and Ray, S. (2009) Municipal Solid Waste Management in Kolkata, India—A Review. Waste Management, 29, 1449-1458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.030Berkun, M., Aras, E. and Nemlioglu, S. (2005) Disposal of Solid Waste in Istanbul and along the Black Sea Coast of Turkey. Waste Management, 25, 847-855. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.04.004Barton, J.R., Issias, I. and Stentiford, E.I. (2008) Carbon—Making the Right Choice for Waste Management in Developing Countries. Waste Management, 28, 690-698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.033Chung, S.S. and Lo, C.W.H. (2008) Local Waste Management Constraints and Waste Administrators in China. Waste Management, 28, 272-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.11.013Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Mahmood, G. and Trivedi, R.C. (2008) Municipal Solid Waste Management in Indian Cities. Waste Management, 28, 459-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.008Wilson, D.C., Velis, C. and Cheeseman, C. (2006) Role of Informal Sector Recycling in Waste Management in Developing Countries. Habitat International, 30, 797-808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.09.005Kapepula, K.-M., Colson, G., Sabri, K. and Thonart, P. (2007) A Multiple Criteria Analysis for Household Solid Waste Management in the Urban Community of Dakar. Waste Management, 27, 1690-1705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.07.009Sujauddin, M., Huda, S.M. and RafiqulHoque, A.T.M. (2008) Household Solid Waste Characteristics and Management in Chittagong, Bangladesh. Waste Management, 28, 1688-1695.Gupta, S., Mohan, K., Parsad, R., Gupta, S. and Kansal, A. (1998) Solid Waste Management in India: Options and Opportunities. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 24, 137-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(98)00033-0Alsamawi, A.A., Zboon, A.T. and Alnakeeb, A. (2009) Estimation of Baghdad Municipal Solid Waste Generation Rate. Engineering & Technology Journal, 127, 15 p.WHO (1996) Annex 2.1: Procedure for Solid Waste Generation. Series No.6, World Health Organization, Western Pacific Region.Buenrostro, O., Bocco, G. and Vence, J. (2001) Forecasting Generation of Urban Solid Waste in Developing Countries—A Case Study in Mexico. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 51, 86-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2001.10464258Abbas, Y.F. (2006) Municipal Solid Waste Management in the Kingdom of Bahrain. 1st Conference on Municipal Action, Conference Center of Bahrain, 26-27 March 2006.Parrot, L., Sotamenou, J. and Dia, B.K. (2009) Municipal Solid Waste Management in Africa: Strategies and Livelihoods in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Waste Management, 29, 986-995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.05.005Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Mahmood, G., Vaishya, R.C. and Gupta, R. (2007) Municipal Solid Characteristics and Waste Management in Allahabad, India. Waste Management, 27, 490-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.001Qu, X.Y., Li, Z., Xie, X., Sui, Y., Yang, L. and Chan, Y. (2009) Survey of Composition and Generation Rate of Household Wastes in Beijing, China. Waste Management, 29, 2618-2624.Imam, A., Mohammed, B., Wilson, D. and Cheeseman, C. (2008) Solid Waste Management in Abuja, Nigeria. Waste Management, 28, 468-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.01.006Ojeda-Benitez, S., de Vega, C.A. and Ramirez-Barreto, M.E. (2003) Characterization and Quantification of Household Solid Wastes in a Mexican City. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 39, 211-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(03)00028-4Kassim, S.M. and Ali, M. (2005) Solid Waste Collection by the Private Sector: Households’ Perspective—Findings from a Study in Dares Salaam City, Tanzania. Habitat International, 30, 769-780. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.09.003Kofoworola O.F. ,et al. (2007)Recovery and Recycling Practices in Municipal Solid Waste Management in Lagos, Nigeria Waste Management 27, 1139-1143.Batool, S. and Nawaz, C.M. (2009) Municipal Solid Waste Management in Lahore City District, Pakstan. Waste Management, 29, 1971-1981