<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMF</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Mathematical Finance</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-2434</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmf.2016.62028</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMF-66981</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Valuation of European Call Options via the Fast Fourier Transform and the Improved Mellin Transform
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sunday</surname><given-names>Emmanuel Fadugba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chuma</surname><given-names>Raphael Nwozo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematical Sciences, Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>crnwozo@yahoo.com(CRN)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>03</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>338</fpage><lpage>359</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>28</month>	<year>May</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This paper considers the valuation of European call options via the fast Fourier transform and the improved Mellin transform. The Fourier valuation techniques and Fourier inversion methods for density calculations add a versatile tool to the set of advanced techniques for pricing and management of financial derivatives. The Fast Fourier transform is a numerical approach for pricing options which utilizes the characteristic function of the underlying instrument’s price process. The Mellin transform has the ability to reduce complicated functions by realization of its many properties. Mellin’s transformation is closely related to an extended form of other popular transforms, particularly the Laplace transform and the Fourier transform. We consider the fast Fourier transform for the valuation of European call options. We also extend a framework based on the Mellin transforms and show how to modify the method to value European call options. We obtain a new integral equation to determine the price of European call by means of the improved Mellin transform. We show that our integral equation for the price of the European call option reduces to the Black-Scholes-Merton formula. The numerical results show that the tremendous speed of the fast Fourier transform allows option prices for a huge number of strikes to be evaluated very rapidly but the damping factor or the integrability parameter must be carefully chosen since it controls the intensity of the fluctuations and the magnitude of the functional values. The improved Mellin transform is more accurate than the fast Fourier transform, converges faster to the Black- Scholes-Merton model, provides accurate comparable prices and the approach can be regarded as a good alternative to existing methods for the valuation of European call option on a dividend paying stock.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Black-Scholes Partial Differential Equation</kwd><kwd> European Call Option</kwd><kwd> Fast Fourier Transform</kwd><kwd> Improved Mellin Transform</kwd><kwd> Mellin Transform</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In the past decades, option pricing has become one of the major areas in modern financial theory and practice. Since the introduction of the celebrated Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which assumes that the underlying stock price follows a geometric Brownian motion (GBM), there is an explosive growth in trading activities on derivatives in the worldwide financial markets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref1">1</xref>] . [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref2">2</xref>] developed a fast Fourier method to compute option prices for a whole range of strikes. This method makes use of the characteristic function of the underlying asset price. The use of the fast Fourier transform method is motivated by the following reasons: the algorithm has speed advantage. This enables the Fourier transform algorithm to calculate prices accurately for a whole range of strikes. The characteristic function of the log-price is known and has a simple form for many models considered in literature while the density is often not known in the closed form. Option values can be calculated numerically by multiplying a payoff function with transition density of an underlying asset, then taking its discounted expectation with respect to an equivalent martingale measure (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref3">3</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref4">4</xref>] ). This method of martingale pricing is often computed with respect to the space of the asset, despite often posing more challenging. In 2002, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref5">5</xref>] pioneered the method of using the Mellin transform to solve the associated Black-Scholes partial differential equation for a European call option. Mellin transforms in option theory were also introduced by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref6">6</xref>] . They derived integral representations for the price of European and American basket put options using Mellin transform techniques. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref7">7</xref>] derived integral representations for the prices of European and American put options on a basket of two-dividend paying stocks using integral method based on the double Mellin transform. They showed that by the decomposition of the integral equation for the price of American basket put option, the integral equation for the price of European basket put option can be obtained directly. The Mellin transform method for the valuation of the American power put option with non-dividend and dividend yields respectively was considered by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref8">8</xref>] . They used the Mellin transform method to derive the integral representations for the price and the free boundary of the American power put option. They also extended their results to derive the free boundary and the fundamental analytic valuation formula for perpetual American power put option. For mathematical backgrounds, sporadic applications of transform methods in financial contexts see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref9">9</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref18">18</xref>] just to mention a few.</p><p>In this paper, we consider the valuation of the European call option via the fast Fourier transform and the improved Mellin transform on a dividend paying stock. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents overview of the Black-Scholes-Merton model. Section 3 considers some fundamental properties of the Fourier transform and the fast Fourier transform method for the valuation of European options. In Section 4, we present the Mellin transform, some basic properties and the application of the improved Mellin transform in the theory of European call option valuation. Section 5 presents some numerical examples and discussion of results. Section 6 concludes the paper.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Black-Scholes-Merton-Like Valuation Formula</title><p>We consider a market where the underlying asset price <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is governed by the stochastic differential equation of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula240"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the volatility, r is the riskless interest rate, q is the dividend yield and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a one-dimensional Wiener process. Standard arbitrage arguments show that any derivative <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> written on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> must satisfy the partial differential equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>Theorem 1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref15">15</xref>] : Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denote the price of the underlying asset, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>the volatility, r the riskless interest rate, n the power of the option, q the dividend yield and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the Wiener process. If the underlying price of the asset <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> follows a random process (Geometric Wiener process) in</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula241"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then the explicit formula for the evolution of the underlying price of the asset is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula242"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof: Let</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula243"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Differentiating (4) we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula244"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Recall from Ito’s lemma and using (2) for any derivative <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula245"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (2), we can write for</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula246"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (4), (5) and (7) into (6) and rearranging the terms, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula247"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula248"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a Brownian motion with drift parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and variance parameter nσ<sup>2</sup>. To derive an explicit formula for the evolution of the stock price, we integrate (9) from 0 to T to obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula249"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula250"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (11) can also be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula251"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where Z ∼ N(0,1). Therefore the stock dynamic follows a log-normal distribution. For n = 1, (12) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula252"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (13) shows that plain vanilla option follows a log-normal distribution.</p><p>Theorem 2: Let the underlying asset price <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> follows a lognormal random walk (geometric Wiener process)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula253"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>using the Ito’s lemma, under the standard arbitrage argument the Black-Scholes partial differential equation for any derivative <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for vanilla power option which pays dividend yield is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula254"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Remark 1</p><p>1) For n = 1, (14) is known as the regular Black-Scholes-Merton partial differential equation which is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula255"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>2) If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a vanilla call option, then (15) becomes the Black-Scholes-Merton partial differential equation for a vanilla call option given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula256"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>3) The solution to (16) is obtained as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula257"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula258"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x41.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the commutative distribution function for the standard normal distribution</p>European Options<p>Definition 1</p><p>European is an option that can be exercised only at the expiry date with linear payoff. European option comes in two forms namely European call and put options.</p><p>Definition 2</p><p>A European call option is an option that can be exercised only at expiry and has a linear payoff given by the difference between underlying asset price at maturity and the exercise price.</p><p>Definition 3</p><p>A European put option is an option that can be exercised only at expiry and has a linear payoff given by the difference between the exercise price and underlying asset price at maturity.</p><p>For a European option on the underlying price of the asset <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with exercise price K and time to expiry T, we have the payoff for the European call option as</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> 18)</p><p>The payoff for the European power put option is given as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula259"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Setting <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (15), then we have the Black-Scholes-Merton partial differential equation for the price of European call option given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula260"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with boundary conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula261"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula262"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and final time condition given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula263"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x50.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Fast Fourier Transform Method for the Valuation of European Call Options</title><p>This section presents some fundamental properties of Fourier transform and the fast Fourier transform method for the valuation of European options. The fast Fourier transform was first proposed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref2">2</xref>] . It ensures that the Fourier transform of the call price exist by the inclusion of a damping factor. Moreover, Fourier inversion can be accomplished by the fast Fourier transform in this case. The tremendous speed of the fast Fourier transform allows option prices for a huge number of strikes to be evaluated very rapidly.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Fourier Transforms</title><p>Definition 4</p><p>Suppose <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is absolutely integrable in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then the Fourier transform of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula264"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The Fourier transform is a generalization of the complex Fourier series.</p><p>Definition 5</p><p>If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is square integrable, then the inverse Fourier transform of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula265"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Some Fundamental Properties of Fourier Transforms</title><p>Let the Fourier transform of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be defined as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then the following fundamental properties hold as follows:</p><p>1) Scaling Property</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula266"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>2) Shifting/Translation Property</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula267"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>3) Fourier Transform of Derivatives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula268"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This process can be iterated for the n<sup>th </sup>derivative to yield</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula269"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, a differentiation converts to multiplication in Fourier space.</p><p>4) Convolution Property</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula270"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula271"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>5) Linear Property</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula272"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. The Fast Fourier Transforms</title><p>The fast Fourier transform (FFT) is proposed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref20">20</xref>] . The fast Fourier transform is an efficient algorithm for computing the discrete Fourier transform of the form;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula273"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where N is typically a power of two. Equation (33) reduces the number of multiplications in the required N summations from an order of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to that of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, a very considerable reduction. Let p and j be written as binary numbers i.e. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then (33) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula274"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x74.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The fast Fourier transform can be described by the following three steps as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula275"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x75.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Remark 2</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref20">20</xref>] showed that it was in fact possible to have the discrete Fourier transform evaluated with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> arithmetic operations. This <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> algorithm is called the fast Fourier transform. As a matter of fact, ef-</p><p>ficient methods for evaluating the discrete Fourier transform have already been devised as long ago as in 1805 by Gauss. However, the world was dormant until 1965. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> illustrates the huge differences between</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The basic idea of the fast Fourier transform is to develop an analytic expression for the Fourier transform of the option price and to get the price by means of Fourier inversion.</p><p>By means of a change of variables<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it is observed that the Fourier transform bears a striking resemblance to the Laplace and the Mellin transforms. In particular, if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denote the two-sided Laplace and Mellin transforms respectively, then we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula276"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. The Characteristic Function in the Domain of the Black-Scholes Model</title><p>The dynamics of the stock price <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in a risk-neutral Black-Scholes world follows geometric Brownian motion with a non-dividend yield is of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula277"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Utilizing the Ito’s formula we can explicitly solve for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula278"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x86.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>from which we can see that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is lognormally distributed. Hence for the characteristic function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula279"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x90.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Huge differences between <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x91.png"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Application of the Fast Fourier Transform for the Valuation of European Call Options</title><p>The Fourier pricing techniques and Fourier inversion methods for density calculations add a versatile tool to the set of advanced techniques for pricing and management of financial derivatives. The Fast Fourier transform method is a numerical approach for pricing options which utilizes the characteristic function of the underlying instrument’s price process. This approach was introduced by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref2">2</xref>] . The Fast Fourier transform method assumes that the characteristic function of the log-price is given analytically.</p><p>Consider the valuation of European call option. Let the risk neutral density of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The characteristic function of the density is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula280"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x96.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The price of a European call option under the risk-neutral valuation with maturity T and exercise price K denoted by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula281"><label>(37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x98.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where p is the log of the strike price K i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula282"><label>(38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (38) into (37) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula283"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in which the expectation is taken with respect to some risk-neutral measure. Since</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula284"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The integral representation given by (39) is not square integrable, i.e. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> does not tend to zero for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We consider a modified version of the call price in (39) given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula285"><label>(40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x105.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (40) is square integrable in p over the entire real line. Using (24) and (25), we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula286"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x106.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula287"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (40) into (41) we obtain a new call value in the Fourier transform domain as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula288"><label>(43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x108.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (43) into (39) we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula289"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x109.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula290"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x110.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Therefore we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula291"><label>(44)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x113.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the characteristic function of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> given by (36).</p><p>Remark 3</p><p>A sufficient condition for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to be square-integrable is given by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> being finite. This is equivalent to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref2">2</xref>] established that if the integrability parameter<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the denominator of (44) vanishes when<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, inducing a singularity in the integrand. Since the fast Fourier transform evaluates the integrand at<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the use of the factor <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is required.</p><p>Now, we obtain the desired option price in terms of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> using Fourier inversion of the form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula292"><label>(45)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x124.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (44) into (45) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula293"><label>(46)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x125.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By recognizing that the call price is real (even in real part, odd in imaginary). Due to the condition a, (46) is well defined. After discretizing and using Simpson’s <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> rule, (46) can be computed numerically by means of the fast Fourier transform as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula294"><label>(47)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x127.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the Kronecker delta function defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula295"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x130.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hence, the integration (46) is an application of the summation (33).</p><p>We formalized remark 3 in the following result below.</p><p>Theorem 3</p><p>Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The Fourier transform of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> exists if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof: We note that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> since</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula296"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x135.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula297"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x136.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (42), we write that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula298"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x137.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Combining this with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> completes the proof.</p><p>Remark 4</p><p>For the Black-Scholes model the integrand in (46) reduces to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula299"><label>(48a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x139.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula300"><label>(48b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x140.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (48b), we can get more fluctuating integrand by increasing any of the parameters<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The magnitudes of these fluctuations get larger which can be seen from the exponential term in (48a).</p><p>Remark 5</p><p>At this point it is unavoidable to comment on the choice of the integrability parameter a. A small value of a is favourable since this reduces both the oscillations and the magnitudes hereof. However choosing a too small can turn the integrand into a sort of impulse function, which is not tractable at all from a numerical integration point of view. This follows from the fact that in the origin<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the Black-Scholes integrand in (48a) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula301"><label>(48c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x143.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking the limit of (48c) as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula302"><label>(48d)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x145.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly (48c) tends to infinity as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula303"><label>(48e)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x147.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>On the other hand, for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and by letting<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x149.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the integrand (48a) becomes:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula304"><label>(48f)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x150.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Equation (48f) decreases very fast as a function of v because of the exponential term.</p><p>The following result shows how the Black-Scholes integrand attains its maximum at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Theorem 4</p><p>Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The Black-Scholes integrand</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula305"><label>(48g)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x154.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>attains its maximum at<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof: From (48c) we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula306"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x157.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We see that (48c) is equivalent to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula307"><label>(48h)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x158.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This follows since</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula308"><label>(48i)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x159.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula309"><label>(48j)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x160.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Moreover,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula310"><label>(48k)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x161.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using (48j) and (48k), we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula311"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x162.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This completes the proof.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Mellin Transform Method for the Valuation of European Call Options</title><p>In this section, we present the Mellin transform, some basic properties and the application of the improved Mellin transform in the theory of option pricing.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Mellin Transforms</title><p>Definition 6</p><p>The Mellin transform is a complex valued function defined on a vertical strip in the ω-plane whose boundaries are determined by the asymptotic behaviour of f(x) as x → 0<sup>+ </sup>and x → ∞. The Mellin transform of the function f(x) is defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula312"><label>(49)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x163.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is called the Mellin transform of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In general, the integral does exist only for complex values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x167.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where u and v depend on the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x167.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to transform. This introduces what is called the strip of definition of the Mellin transform that will be denoted by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x167.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In some cases, this strip may be extended to half-plane <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x167.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x167.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Definition 7</p><p>If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an integrable function with fundamental strip<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x173.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then if c such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x173.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x174.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x173.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x174.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is integrable, the equality</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula313"><label>(50)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x176.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>holds almost everywhere. Moreover, if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is continuous, then the equality holds everywhere on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x178.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x179.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined on the positive real axis <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x179.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x180.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x179.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x180.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x181.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then the following properties of the Mellin transform hold.</p><p>a) Shifting Property</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula314"><label>(51)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x182.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>b) Scaling Property</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula315"><label>(52)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x183.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>c) The Mellin Transform of Derivatives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula316"><label>(53)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x184.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the symbol <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x185.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined for k integer by;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula317"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x186.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equations (51) and (53) can be used in various ways to find the effect of linear combination of differential operator such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x187.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> integers. The most remarkable results are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula318"><label>(54)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x188.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where j is a positive integer and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x189.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>d) Convolution Property</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula319"><label>(55)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x190.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Integral Representation for the Price of European Call Options via the Mellin Transform</title><p>We observe that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula320"><label>(56)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x191.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the Mellin transform for the call option does not exist and the integral fails to converge. In this paper we use the improved version of the Mellin transform for the valuation of the European call option with the variable change</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula321"><label>(57)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x192.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>With this change the usual notation for the transform is preserved. This is to ensure the Mellin transform of the European call payoff function exists for some fundamental strip. The improved Mellin transform for the price of the European call option is defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula322"><label>(58)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x193.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Conversely the inversion formula for (58) is given by</p><p><img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x195.png" /><img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x194.png" /> (59)</p><p>Taking the improved Mellin transform of (20) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula323"><label>(60)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x196.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (60) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula324"><label>(61)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x197.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula325"><label>(62)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x198.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (62) is the general solution of (61), with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x199.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x199.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x200.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a constant that depends on the final time condition/ terminal condition which is of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula326"><label>(63)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x201.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula327"><label>(64)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x202.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (64) is the improved Mellin transform of the final time condition.</p><p>Substituting (64) into (63) we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula328"><label>(65)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x203.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using (62) and (65), we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula329"><label>(66)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x204.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking the inverse improved Mellin transform of (66), the integral representation for the price of European call option is obtained as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula330"><label>(67)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x205.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x206.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x206.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x207.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a constant and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x206.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x207.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x208.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Theorem 5: The boundary value problem for the Black-Scholes-Merton Equation (20) for the price of the European call option with exercise price K, subject to the boundary condition (23) has a unique solution of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula331"><label>(68)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x209.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof: The differential equation given by (61) of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula332"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x210.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula333"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x211.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>can also be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula334"><label>(69)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x212.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the final time condition given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula335"><label>(70)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x213.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The solution to (69) is obtained as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula336"><label>(71)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x214.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Simplifying (71) further, yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula337"><label>(72)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x215.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula338"><label>(73)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x216.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking the inverse improved Mellin transform of (72), we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula339"><label>(74)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x217.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Setting</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula340"><label>(75)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x218.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (74) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula341"><label>(76)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x219.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula342"><label>(77)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x220.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the scaling property (52) and the convolution property (55), we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula343"><label>(78)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x221.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If we impose the final time condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula344"><label>(79)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x222.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (79) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula345"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x223.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula346"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x224.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula347"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x225.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hence, (68) is established.</p><p>Theorem 6: The boundary value problem for the Black-Scholes-Merton equation for the price of the European put option with exercise price K given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula348"><label>(80)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x226.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>subject to the boundary condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula349"><label>(81)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x227.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula350"><label>(82)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x228.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and final time condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula351"><label>(83)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x229.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>has a unique solution of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula352"><label>(84)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x230.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula353"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x231.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof: Using scaling property (52), convolution property (55), the final time condition (83) and the put-call parity. Equation (84) follows from theorem 5.</p><p>Theorem 7: The expressions (67), (68) and Black-Scholes-Merton model</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula354"><label>(85)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x232.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula355"><label>(86)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x233.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for the European call option are analytically equivalent.</p><p>Proof: From (67) we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula356"><label>(87)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x234.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula357"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x235.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Simplifying (87) further yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula358"><label>(88)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x236.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x237.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Now, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x238.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the Mellin transform of</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula359"><label>(89)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x239.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using equation (7.2.1) in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref21">21</xref>] which is of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula360"><label>(90)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x240.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula361"><label>(91)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x241.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By means of convolution property of the Mellin transforms (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66981-ref22">22</xref>] ). The price of the European call option becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula362"><label>(92)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x242.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (81) we write that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula363"><label>(93)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x243.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Combining (79), (92) and (93) we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula364"><label>(94)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x244.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula365"><label>(95)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x245.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula366"><label>(96)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x246.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula367"><label>(97)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x247.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula368"><label>(98)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x248.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>To evaluate the first and second integrals in (97) and (98), we use the transformations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula369"><label>(99)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x249.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula370"><label>(100)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x250.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>respectively.</p><p>Finally, we obtain the first and second parts of (94) as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula371"><label>(101)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x251.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula372"><label>(102)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x252.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x253.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are given by (86).</p><p>Substituting (101) and (102) into (94) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66981-formula373"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x254.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This completes the proof.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Numerical Examples and Discussion of Results</title><p>In this section, we present some examples to compare the results obtained by the fast Fourier transform and the improved Mellin transform with the values of the Black-Scholes-Merton model.</p><p>Example 1</p><p>We consider the pricing of the European call option on a dividend-paying stock via fast Fourier transform and the Mellin transform with the following parameters</p><p>in the context of the Black-Scholes-Merton model. The option values, P, absolute error and log absolute error for the two transforms against the values of the Black-Scholes-Merton model are shown in Figures 2-4.</p><p>Example 2</p><p>We consider the valuation of European call option with Forty-Eight months to go until expiration on the “Standard and Poor’s 500” index (S &amp; P 500), with a current price of $110, a strike price of $100, a continuously compounded interest rate of 5%, a volatility of 35% and varying a constant annual index dividend estimated</p><p>at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x258.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>using fast Fourier transform, improved Mellin transform, Monte Carlo method</p><p>in the context of the Black-Scholes-Merton model. The influence of dividend yield on the results generated is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p>Discussion of Results<p>Figures 2-4 show that the fast Fourier transform and the improved Mellin transform perform better and agree with the values of the Black-Scholes-Merton model. We can also see that the improved Mellin transform provides a close approximation to the Black-Scholes-Merton formula. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows that the values of the improved Mellin transform, Monte Carlo method and the Black-Scholes-Merton model coincide. Also the higher</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The comparative result analyses of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) and the Black-Scholes-Merton model (BSM)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x259.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> The comparative result analyses of the improved Mellin transform (MT) and the Black-Scholes-Merton model (BSM)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x260.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> The comparative results analysis of the fast Fourier transform (FFT), the improved Mellin transforms (MT) and the Black-Scholes-Merton model (BSM)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x261.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> The influence of dividend yield on the valuation of European call option via the fast Fourier transform (FFT), the improved Mellin transform (MT), the Monte Carlo method (MC) and the Black-Scholes-Merton model (BSM)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1490421x262.png"/></fig><p>the dividend yield, the smaller the values of the methods. The numerical results show that the tremendous speed of the fast Fourier transform allows option prices for a huge number of strikes to be evaluated very rapidly but the damping factor or the integrability parameter must be carefully chosen since it controls the intensity of the fluctuations and the magnitude of the functional values. The improved Mellin transform provides accurate comparable prices and the approach can be regarded as a good alternative to existing methods.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>We have considered the fast Fourier transform and the improved Mellin transform for the valuation of the European call option which pays dividend yield. Financial modeling in the area of option pricing involves detailed knowledge about stochastic processes describing the asset payoffs. For sophisticated price dynamics, these are most conveniently characterized through functions in image space. By a mapping of the probability function from spatial domain to the unit circle in the complex plane, expected values of a future payoff are then available in the form of an integral representation. In this paper, we outlined general features of Fourier transform techniques applicable to both the modeling of density functions and European call option pricing. We also consider some properties of the Mellin transform and its applications in the theory of option valuation. To emphasis the generality of our results, we have shown the equivalence of the integral representation for the price of the European call option via the improved Mellin transform to the Black-Scholes-Merton formula. From Figures 2-5, we can see that the improved Mellin transform provides a close approximation to the Black-Scholes-Merton model, more accurate than the fast Fourier transform and it is a good alternative method for the valuation of the European call option on a dividend paying stock.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sunday Emmanuel Fadugba,Chuma Raphael Nwozo, (2016) Valuation of European Call Options via the Fast Fourier Transform and the Improved Mellin Transform. Journal of Mathematical Finance,06,338-359. doi: 10.4236/jmf.2016.62028</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.66981-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973) The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/260062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carr, P. and Madan, D. (1999) Option Valuation Using the Fast Fourier Transform. Journal of Computational Finance, 3, 463-520.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Musiela, M. and Rutkowski, M. (2006) Martingale Methods in Financial Modelling. Springer, Berlin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duffie, D. (2010) Dynamic Asset Pricing Theory. 3rd Edition, Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cruz-Baez, D.I. and Gonzalez-Rodriguez, J.M. (2002) Semigroup Theory Applied to Options. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2, 131-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1110757X02111041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Panini, R. and Srivastav, R.P. (2004) Option Pricing with Mellin Transforms. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40, 43-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2004.07.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fadugba, S.E. and Nwozo, C.R. (2015) Integral Representations for the Price of Vanilla Put Options on a Basket of Two-Dividend Paying Stocks. Applied Mathematics, 6, 783-792. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/am.2015.65074</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fadugba, S.E. and Nwozo, C.R. (2005) Mellin Transform Method for the Valuation of the American Power Put Option with Non-Dividend and Dividend Yields. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 5, 249-272. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmf.2015.53023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>McKean</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1965</year>)<article-title>Appendix: A Free Boundary Problem for the Heat Equation Arising from a Problem in Mathematical Economics</article-title><source> Industrial Management Review</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 32</fpage>-<lpage>39</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buser, S.A. (1986) LaPlace Transforms as Present Value Rules: A Note. The Journal of Finance, 41, 243-247. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04502.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jodar, L.P., Sevilla-Peris, P., Cortes, J.C. and Sala, R. (2002) A New Direct Method for Solving the Black-Scholes Equation. Applied Mathematics Letters, 18, 29-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2002.12.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bakshi, G. and Madan, D. (2000) Spanning and Derivative Security Valuation. Journal of Financial Economics, 55, 205-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00050-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frontczak, R. (2013) Simple Analytical Approximations for the Critical Stock Price of American Options. Working Pa per. http://ssrn.com//abstract=2227626 
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2227626</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AlAzemi, F., AlAzemi, A. and Boyadjiev, L. (2014) Mellin Transform Method for Solving the Black-Scholes Equations. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 97, 287-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v97i3.3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwozo, C.R. and Fadugba, S.E. (2014) Mellin Transform Method for the Valuation of Some Vanilla Power Options with Non-Dividend Yield. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 96, 79-104. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v96i1.7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwozo, C.R. and Fadugba, S.E. (2014) Performance Measure of Laplace Transforms for Pricing Path Dependent Options. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 94, 175-197.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v94i2.5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, J. (2000) Modular Pricing of Options. An Application of Fourier Analysis. Springer, Berlin. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04309-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwozo, C.R. and Fadugba, S.E. (2015) On Two Transform Methods for the Valuation of Contingent Claims. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 5, 88-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmf.2015.52009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wilmott, P., Dewynne, J. and Howison, S. (1993) Option Pricing, Mathematical Models and Computation. Oxford Financial Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cooley, J.W. and Turkey, J.W. (1965) An Algorithm for the Machine Computation of the Complex Fourier Series. Mathematics of Computation, 19, 297-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1965-0178586-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Erdelyi, A., Magnus, W., Oberhettinger, F. and Tricomi, F. (1954) Tables of Integral Transforms. Vol. 1-2, McGraw-Hill, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66981-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sneddon, I. (1972) The Use of Integral Transforms. McGraw-Hill, New York.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>