<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Geosciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8359</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijg.2016.75059</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJG-66961</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Physico-Chemical and Petrographic Characterization of Carbonated Rocks of Mintom (South-Cameroon) and Their Potential Uses
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>o’o</surname><given-names>Zame Philémon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mpakam</surname><given-names>Hernanie Grelle</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samba</surname><given-names>Assomo Philippe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>The Higher Institute of the Sahel, University of Maroua, Maroua, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>sambafilipe@yahoo.fr(SAP)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>05</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>775</fpage><lpage>783</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>20</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>28</month>	<year>May</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The characterization of carbonated rocks of Mintom allowed identifying three features (massive limestone, banded limestone and dolomite). Samples taken in these features were subjected to the physico-chemical analyses and to the mechanical tests. The results obtained show a convergence in the mineralogical composition in particular in the calcareous features (smectite, micas and calcite); the dolomite feature being mainly constituted by dolomite associated with the smectite. The chemical composition allows finding contents raised in CaO, in all the samples. However, in the dolomite and the banded limestone, the concentrations in MgO and in SiO
  <sub>2</sub>
   
  are also important. The mechanical properties showed a good compression resistance for the massive limestone and the dolomite, the mechanical behavior of the banded limestone being low. The exploitation of these results allows recommending carbonated rocks of Mintom in the production of the clinker, agricultural amendments and in the constructions of the civil engineering.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Mintom</kwd><kwd> Carbonated Rocks</kwd><kwd> Characterization</kwd><kwd> Physico-Chemical</kwd><kwd> Petrographic</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The need for major infrastructure work in Cameroon imposes a cement addition use for various concrete formulations. This ambition faces a very low national production for this type of binder because of a limited number of cement manufactures. The characterization of carbonated rocks of Mintom appears as well as one of the avenues to explore in order to consider the production of clinker from these rocks that may serve as raw material for cement manufacture. It is also important to consider other uses for these materials. Under these conditions, a more holistic characterization appears necessary in order to optimize the exploitation of carbonated rocks of the study area. This publication has two main objectives, firstly, chemical and petrographic characterization of rocks and secondly the identification of potential uses of each material.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Presentation of the Study Area</title><p>The study area is located in the Dja and Lobo Division between the districts of Djoum and Mintom in the administrative region of South Cameroon. It is hosted in the great valley of the River Dja at 592 m altitude [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref1">1</xref>] . This area is subjected to the equatorial climate with four seasons and extends from 13˚10' - 13˚30' Long E and from 2˚44' - 2˚55' Lat N (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Previous Work on the Site</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Geology</title><p>Carbonated rocks of Mintom constitute the upper series of Dja [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref4">4</xref>] . A part from the sedimentary formations, the area reveals the presence of metamorphic rocks (gneiss, schist, mica) and plutonic rocks (gabbro, granite). Structurally, the region is crossed by numerous of tectonic structures such as faults, folds and mylonite. The work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref5">5</xref>] show that this basin is limited at North by the Pan African belt and at south by the Congo Craton (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The main geological formations (shales, dolomites and limestones) are covered with argillites and laterite. Two main soils run throughout the area including yellow lateritic soils in land and hydromorphic soils in the lowlands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref7">7</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Lithostratigraphy</title><p>The study of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref4">4</xref>] led to subdivide the upper Dja series in four lithological units from bottom to top, there are: The unity of Kol, made with diamictite on its base and pelit on the summit; Metou unit composed of massive dolomite; Mominbol&#233; unit that has an alternation of limestone and clay: it is a pelitic limestone and the Atog Adjap unit composed of clear limestone and yellowish gray band. From the photogeological analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref4">4</xref>] , it appears that, the different features which form the sedimentary basin of Mintom stick out in a powerful soil layer near the Dja River. The survey S1 of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref2">2</xref>] in BI was used to estimate the relative thickness of limestone feature (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Thus, the massive limestone has a thickness of 21 m, while the banded limestone features extends over a thickness of 24 m.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Methodology</title><p>The methodology of work is divided into two major activities including field campaigns and laboratory work.</p><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Location of the study area.</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x6.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x7.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Geology of the area</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x8.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Field Campaigns</title><p>They took place in four stages. The first phase consisted of an exploration of the study area in order to locate outcrops; the second was used to determine the sampling points and the two last stages were devoted to sample in previously defined sampling points. The samples were collected by geological hammer at three points defined on various features. Then, they were packed in sampling plastic bags. Field campaigns have also helped to give the description of the different features encountered.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Laboratory Work</title><p>Laboratory work concern the analysis of different samples collected in the field. These analyzes were performed in different laboratories. The <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> gives the synthesis of laboratory analysis.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Presentation of the Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Outcrops and Geological Structures</title><p>Several geological structures and outcrops were encountered (block, slab, escarpment, cleavage, bend, fault) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Features</title><p>Three major features have been described from outcrops and geological structures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). They are:</p><p>・ Massive limestone feature</p><p>It is observed mainly in Atog-Adjap where it is very extensive. It is a hard gray rock and very effervescent in HCL. Its structure shows alternating benches separated by thin layer of dark argillite. In optical microscope, the rock is homogeneous and composed with very small crystals (&lt;20 microns).</p><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Stratigraphic log of survey S1.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x9.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x10.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>・ Banded limestone feature</p><p>It is a dark gray rock characterized by alternating light and dark bands. The thickness of a band varies between 10 - 15 cm. In thin blade, the texture is cryptogranular with small calcite crystals (0.03 mm). We also note the presence of veins (e = 60 microns) filled with black politic material.</p><p>・ Dolomite feature</p><p>It is a massive ocher rock, very resistant to hammer and very low effervescence in HCl. In microscope, the bottom is dolomicritic with many microcracks showing dolomite and quartz recrystallization. It is noted the</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of laboratory works</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Works and analysis performed</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Laboratories involved</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cutting rocks, obtaining powders and preparation of thin sections</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minerals Processing Laboratory (MTL) of the Institute of Geological and Mining Research (IRGM) in Cameroon</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DRX whole rock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mission of Promotion of Local Materials (MIPROMALO), Cameroon</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Preparation of thin sections Optical microscopy, major element (geochemistry)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mineral Sciences Laboratory at the National Office of Geological Research, Algeria Office of Geological and Mining Research (BRGM), France</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Physico-mechanical analyzes and mechanical tests</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >National Laboratory of Civil Engineering, Cameroon</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gravimetry, geochemistry of major elements</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Laboratory of Chemical Analyzes, Figuil, Cameroon</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Outcrops and structures of the study area.</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x13.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x12.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x11.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_4"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x16.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_5"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x15.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_6"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x14.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_7"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x19.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_8"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x18.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_9"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x17.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_10"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x20.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig5"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Features encountered. (1) Massive limestone feature; (2) Banded limestone feature; (3) Dolomite feature.</title></caption><fig id ="fig5_1"><label> (2)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x23.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_2"><label> (3)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x22.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x21.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>presence of micro-cracks and wall rock piles in pyrite grains.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Mineralogy</title><p>The X-ray diffraction analysis sample’s powders obtained from different features gave the results that are illustrated by corresponding diffractograms. From these results (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>), it appears that calcite, mica and smectite constitute the major elements of massive limestone. The banded limestone is composed of calcite; mica and smectite while the mineralogical composition of dolomite is made only by dolomite and smectite.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Geochemistry</title><p>Chemical analyzes of samples have identified the different chemical compositions of the different features expressed as percentages of oxides. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> presents the summary of the results. The analysis of these results shows that the massive limestone is rich in CaO and SiO<sub>2</sub>, the massive limestone in CaO. For dolomite, the most important elements are the CaO and MgO. These contents can be the basis for various industrial uses.</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Mechanical Properties</title><p>The exploitation of mechanical results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) shows that the massive limestone rock is a low-wear, resistant to both, fragmentation, and compression and relatively dense. The banded limestone meanwhile is a rock with high wear, weakly resistant to both fragmentation, and compressive strength and low density. Concerning dolomite, it is a rock with very low wear, very resistant to both, fragmentation and compression and relatively dense.</p></sec><sec id="s4_6"><title>4.6. Areas of Use of Rocks</title><p>The main uses recognized for carbonated material and the main uses of specifications are presented below:</p><p>For massive limestone</p><p>It can serve as raw material for the production of clinker (CaO ˃ 42% MgO &lt; 2% Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ˃ 1% Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> ˃ 2% SiO<sub>2</sub> ˃ 6%); Agriculture’s amendments and production of quicklime. Mechanically, its low wear (MDE = 17%), high resistance to fragmentation (LA = 20%), its high compressive strength (MPa = 107) and its high density, predispose it in civil engineering work.</p><p>For banded limestone</p><p>Their high wear MDE = 48%), low resistance to fragmentation (LA = 27.5%), their low density and compressive strength MPa = 49) showed that the main uses of this material are recruited in the areas of ornamental stones.</p><p>For dolomite</p><p>Geochemical properties of dolomite show that it can be used in the steel industry or agriculture as amendments. Its mechanical properties notably its low wear (MDE = 11%) its high resistance to fragmentation (LA = 19%), its high compressive strength (MPa = 118) and high density, describe it as good material in civil engineering.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion of Results</title><p>The Mintom carbonate rocks were already the subject of previous work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref8">8</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref9">9</xref>] . The [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref2">2</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref3">3</xref>] have focused on the establishment of a cement factory in Mintom and the determination of its location. The study of the</p><fig-group id="fig6"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Mineralogy of features. (a) Massive limestone; (b) Banded limestone; (c) Dolomite.</title></caption><fig id ="fig6_1"><label>(b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x24.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig6_2"><label>(c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x25.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig6_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2801245x26.png"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of the results of chemical analysis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample/Feature</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SO<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PF</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Massive limestone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Banded limestone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂Ld</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dolomite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L.d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Mechanical properties of the samples collected in different features</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nbreof test</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MDE in % (wear)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LA in % (fragmentation)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compressive strength (MPa)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Volumetric weight in (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Massive limestone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Banded limestone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Dolomite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.30</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>environment deposits of carbonate rocks and their implications on the theory of the earth Snowball in Neprozoic is tackled by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref4">4</xref>] . All these studies agree on the fact that the carbonate rocks of Mintom fall into several features organized in different lithostatic units. However, on contrary, the work of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref4">4</xref>] , which identify three different features in the basin notably massive limestone, banded limestone and dolomite, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref2">2</xref>] had reported only made of limestone feature. Also, there is a clear difference between the origins of the samples analyzed; the samples analyzed in this study were collected in the feature of rock outcrops while other authors have analyzed samples with a drill core S1. The comparison results show that the samples of the core, especially the upper part with a depth of between 7 m and 28 m have great interest in the production of clinker thank to their very high content CaO. This result is in agreement with the work of the Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation, which situates the limestone under a layer of laterite and conglomerate at the same depth. All authors also agree on the various highlighted carbonated rocks for direct use in the context of civil engineering constructions or indirect use when chemical composition is favorable to the production of clinker [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref8">8</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref11">11</xref>] . However, several security arrangements must be made to face several diseases in the locality of the clinker’s manufactory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref12">12</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66961-ref15">15</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>This work, done in the Mintom sedimentary basin in equatorial South East Cameroon, was to examine all uses of an industrial nature of carbonate rocks of the basin. To do this, petrographic, mineralogical and geochemical characterization prior, associated with physical-mechanical testing was necessary. The main results show that the studied basin contains three features including the massive limestone, banded limestone and dolomite. The massive limestone is hard rock, light gray, to micritic texture composed of calcite, combined with small amounts of mica and smectite. The chemical composition is dominated by the CaO while banded limestone is a dark gray rock with cryptogranular texture composed of calcite and mica. The dolomite is a massive ocher rock with dolomicritic texture and composed essentially of dolomite. Its chemical composition is dominated by CaO and MgO. In mechanical terms, the massive limestone and dolomite rocks are dense, which exhibit good resistance to wear, fragmentation and compression. Conversely, banded limestone is softer and more fragile. The petrological, physical and mechanical properties of materials studied show that they can serve as raw material suitable for the production of clinker, lime and agricultural amendments and civil engineering’s work.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Zo’o Zame Phil&#233;mon,Mpakam Hernanie Grelle,Samba Assomo Philippe, (2016) Physico-Chemical and Petrographic Characterization of Carbonated Rocks of Mintom (South-Cameroon) and Their Potential Uses. International Journal of Geosciences,07,775-783. doi: 10.4236/ijg.2016.75059</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.66961-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bitom, D. (1998) Organization and Evolution of Ferralitic Coverage in the Humid Tropics (Cameroon). Genesis and set Transformation Ferruginous Deep Indurated. Thesis, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, 164 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vanhoutte, M. and Salley, P. (1986) Recognition of Limestone Mintom: Mining Project South Cameroon. United Nations Program Report 104691-59.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IRGM (2008) Geological Studies, Geophysical, Hydrological and Hydrogeological Limestone of Mintom. IRGM, 162 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Caron, V., Ekomane, E., Malieux, G., Moussango, P. and Ndjeng, E. (2010) Mintom Formation (New): Sedimentory and Geochemestry of Neoproterozoic, Paralic Succession in South East Cameroon. Journal of African Earth Science, 57, 367-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2009.11.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feumoe, S., Ndougsa-Mbarga, T., Dicom-Manguelle, E. and Derek, J. (2012) Delineation of Tectonic Lineaments Using Aeromagnetic Data for the Area South-East Cameroon. Geofizika, 29, 175-192.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nyeck, B. (2005) Organization of Ferralitic Coverage Nsimi-Zoetele Watershed Forest in Southern Cameroon Plateau Central Africa: The Role of the Pore Space and Water Dynamics in Its Transformation. Doctor Thesis, University of Yaoundé I, Yaounde, 434 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bekoa, E. (1994) Petrological and Geochemical Study of a Soil Cover on Gneiss in Forest Areas of South Cameroon: Relationship with the Dynamics of the Iron. Doctor Thesis, University of Yaoundé I, Yaounde, 187 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IRGM (2012) Geological Studies, Geophysical, Hydrological and Hydrogeological Limestone of Mintom. Phases 2, 102 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ekomane, E., Bissé, S., Ngueuthcthoua, G. and Ngos, S. (2014) Contribution of Staff, Track and Rare Earth Elements in the Determination of Sandstone and Pelite Source Rocks in Banga (Cameroon). CAM Review, 2, 5-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ekodeck, G. (1984) Weathering of Metamorphic Rocks in Southern Cameroon and Their Geotechnical Aspects. Th. Doct. Univ. Scientif. And Medic, Grenoble I, 368 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Onana, V. (2010) Weathering of Chlorite Series Mbalmayo-Bengbis (Southern Cameroon) and It Geotechnical Implications. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Sciences, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, 242 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zo’oZame, P. (2012) Petrographic Characterization of Carbonated Rocks of Mintom for a Local Industrial Use. Th. Doct. PhD Thesis, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, 135 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Galdibé, G. (2008) Petrographic and Structural Study of the Bergui-Career Bidzar. Mem Bachelor Univ Ngaoundéré, 42 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">GENIVAR (2012) Arnaud Mine Project. Summary of the Environmental Impact Study. GENIVAR, 107 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66961-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toumba, O. and Wakponou, A. (2014) Mining in the District of Figuil (Cameroon): Public Health and Environmental Effects. BELGEO, 4, 14 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>