<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2011.28098</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-6678</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Cosmological Evolution of Baryonic Matter’S Density Perturbations Under Influence of the Quintessence
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>hechin</surname><given-names>Leonid Mikhajlovich</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>chechin@aphi.kz</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>08</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>834</fpage><lpage>840</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>March</day>	<month>28,</month>	<year>2011</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>May</day>	<month>15,</month>	<year>2011</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>6,</month>	<year>2011</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  For deeper understanding the process of baryonic matter evolution in the expanding Universe it is necessary to know the physical property of concrete field that represents the background of substrate type of dark energy. Beside, it is necessary to explore in details the influence of such field on the continuous medium of baryonic matter. These statements were realized for the quintessence field that describes by two gravitating scalar fields. They give own contributions at the total pressure and at the total mass density of baryonic matter. It allowed show that evolution of baryonic matter’s density perturbations obeys the equation of forced oscillations and admits the resonance case, when amplitude of baryonic matter’s density perturbations gets the strong short-time splash. This splash interprets as a new macroscopic mechanism of the initial matter density perturbations appearance.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Baryonic Matter’S Density Perturbations</kwd><kwd> Quintessence Field</kwd><kwd> Nonstationary Equation Of State Of The Universe</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The evolution of baryonic matter from its density fluctuations appearance up to the processes of galaxies origin is one of the most important problems for modern cosmology [1,2]. This theme was considered as in Newtonian cosmology and as in the framework of relativistic cosmology from different sides (see, for example, [3,4]). Some current tendencies in this problem, in particular, are lighting in articles [5,6].</p><p>We’ll focus this paper on another aspect of this problem. Namely, in many articles the influence of different cosmological substrates on the evolution of baryonic matter’s perturbations was reduced to setting their equations of state, i.e. to setting parameter<img src="9-7500414\36d0d9a4-b463-472d-a295-e7afdfffc5f0.jpg" />. As the result it leads to setting the different expressions of Hubble constant in the “friction term” of the basic equation</p><p><img src="9-7500414\05dbe924-2122-474c-bdab-16ac8b171656.jpg" />that describes the evolution of baryonic matter’s density perturbations. However, this approach allows consider such evolution as the process that elapses on the background of nonbaryonic cosmic substrate, only (and even stay in shadow the physical properties of this substrate).</p><p>But in realty this substrate interacts with baryonic matter in definite way. That is why it is essential to consider its influence on the baryonic matter evolution in details. Lower it will be shown that chosen variant of substance (quintessence field with parameter<img src="9-7500414\13113f29-fcb5-4389-8684-fc4737f40951.jpg" />) describes as small time-increasing field <img src="9-7500414\b1d40196-cc65-40f9-b72d-d33b80c3430f.jpg" /> on the background of constant scalar field<img src="9-7500414\a613ff38-b372-47d5-95c6-dcf349fc65fb.jpg" />, while chosen variant of baryonic matter describes as small wave-type fluctuations</p><p><img src="9-7500414\d3ca3c8c-0d1f-4c36-9a3d-21ecf47ecee7.jpg" /></p><p>on the background of uniformly distributed motionless gas with nonvariable mass density<img src="9-7500414\2eb8c192-5cf3-4955-9637-f5247080d3f6.jpg" />. Thus we have the system of two small fields (<img src="9-7500414\5e5f3606-f3a4-4691-a4ca-6dc3721ead07.jpg" />and<img src="9-7500414\0a8692de-9297-4dd2-8864-8914d50f918d.jpg" />) that evolves on the stable background of <img src="9-7500414\5271fc77-0460-49ce-bcb6-a7a4770d9ebd.jpg" /> and<img src="9-7500414\a8e9da06-030a-4531-9a3a-0531303ab5e2.jpg" />.</p><p>Such problem wording, hence, is analogous to those in cosmology where the multi-fluids evolution searches [7-10] and, more generally, in hydrodynamics where the motion of poly-component media examines (see, for example, [11,12]). Beside, for the closed to our physical system (scalar field and perfect fluid) the properties of cosmological density perturbations were considered in article [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref13">13</xref>]. Mark, that opposite physical situation is permissible, also. In fact, the cosmological evolution of two coupled scalar fields in the presence of a barotropic fluid was examined in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref14">14</xref>].</p><p>It is also necessary to enumerate some articles where different aspects of the mutual interaction between baryonic matter and quintessence were examined. In fact, in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref15">15</xref>] was estimated the amplitude of perturbation in dark energy at different length scales for a quintessence model with an exponential potential; in [16-18] was considered the growth of perturbations in dark matter coupled with quintessence.</p><p>Some other cosmological aspects of quintessence existence were done in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p>This article organized as follows. In Section 2, we demonstrate that two scalar fields can describe the physical properties of quintessence field. (Mark that variant of the quintessence description by two scalar fields, similar to our, have been proposed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref20">20</xref>]. Two-scalar fields approach for the dark energy description was considered in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref21">21</xref>], also). Section 3 devotes to searching the evolution of scalar field <img src="9-7500414\ed0002e6-1645-4ea0-af43-d9150f8a7045.jpg" /> that represents as small standing waves on the background of basic scalar field<img src="9-7500414\a413f689-e634-4e62-a44d-c206b7644a72.jpg" />. Section 4 is devoted to exploring the influence of field <img src="9-7500414\82c0362d-51c1-4f56-a520-c30747d7114c.jpg" /> on the evolution of baryonic matter’s density perturbations. In Section 5 we examine the effect of stimulation the baryonic matter’s density perturbations growing by scalar field<img src="9-7500414\87d04680-056a-494c-8a4e-e9b501edd4a0.jpg" />. Our conclusions are presented in Section 6, finally.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Scalar Fields Representing the Quintessence Field</title><p>One of the actual problems for modern cosmology is the theoretical description of quintessence field—one type of dark energy. Its observable properties are the scale homogeneity and the absence of clustering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref22">22</xref>]. Quintessence is described by an ordinary scalar field minimally coupled to gravity, but with particular potentials that lead to late time inflation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref23">23</xref>]. The action for quintessence is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152882"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\a04ae64b-7356-4873-8712-836499c07d3f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="9-7500414\d8317aa7-a676-40da-b389-51fd1504c3a4.jpg" /> is the 3-dimensional Laplace operator,<img src="9-7500414\0cf18986-0319-4f55-8b17-f653e3c12cdd.jpg" />— potential of any scalar field.</p><p>The simplest equation of state for any type of dark energy usually chooses in the linear form<img src="9-7500414\67ca2d45-6cfc-48ea-b49d-13eb666701e5.jpg" />, where magnitude of <img src="9-7500414\279da492-8895-4ca3-849d-1be6a863e466.jpg" /> lays within the interval</p><p><img src="9-7500414\83026adb-1cb9-4b46-938f-5c6a438d9161.jpg" /></p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref24">24</xref>]. Therefore</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152883"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\9eb4bd71-f3d7-4742-92df-ef0827a9c0d6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Later on we’ll describe arbitrary quintessential field <img src="9-7500414\71978931-4c47-45a0-b55f-f668d053dfc7.jpg" /> by coupled scalar fields—ordinary <img src="9-7500414\362049b0-b59d-4345-b208-0acde6c8f2b9.jpg" /> and Higgstype<img src="9-7500414\8815e3e5-d566-4fb0-bed3-0db4d79e519c.jpg" />.</p><p>Thus consider the self-consistent problem for the mutual evolution of fields and Universe. The corresponding system of Einstein’s equations and equations of two interacting scalar fields is</p><p><img src="9-7500414\2bdc209a-3268-4114-8529-d66ae3289833.jpg" />(3)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152884"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\a4c2cf18-24cf-423e-9253-0f78162f5cd2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152885"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\6f5fa957-8abd-4b96-a710-0e5db3732293.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let masses and fields correlate each other as <img src="9-7500414\bc7cf3d7-8281-4578-8830-ad256e0a9465.jpg" /> while the self-action coefficients fulfill inequality—<img src="9-7500414\20590a13-c03a-48b8-8413-6b922fea92c8.jpg" />. Hence, the period of oscillations for field <img src="9-7500414\f2a64ca1-9855-48a4-bc22-fa52256e1d3e.jpg" /> is essentially larger than the period of oscillations for field <img src="9-7500414\24ea0004-6133-4add-8c6c-7cc30fdc969e.jpg" /> (<img src="9-7500414\15a81f81-303d-4c4b-974c-356ac1e64df9.jpg" />) and<img src="9-7500414\a451eb94-5662-4950-8557-9b5f6431eeb8.jpg" />, accordingly. In another words, in time of field <img src="9-7500414\5ceaf973-09d8-430e-a379-ab544cf93481.jpg" /> changing the basic field <img src="9-7500414\803226f4-0974-4e6c-b8f5-51e28649d50b.jpg" /> don’t change practically, i.e. we may describe it by the conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152886"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\ec3d0f9e-009a-424d-8d44-15d252c2f9ee.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>After neglecting the fields’ self-actions we get the simplified system of equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152887"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\a1c08010-7f10-47fe-b433-a8890109bd16.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152888"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\aad7499d-dbc8-4d63-9a84-0bf1b7ca28d1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which will be under our analyzes. Here <img src="9-7500414\d71ae30b-c42a-41a9-9999-4f0bc5a5bf66.jpg" /> is the squared field’s <img src="9-7500414\9d90a100-45de-405d-b8bc-81fca235654e.jpg" /> effective mass that determines by field mass <img src="9-7500414\47791d48-a268-4848-a4ad-4ba9255152e7.jpg" /> and its interaction with field<img src="9-7500414\4da9bbb4-8ab0-4a9a-b095-ca27637b1c03.jpg" />.</p><p>Later on it is necessary to set masses of scalar fields and their initial amplitudes. According [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref25">25</xref>] their typical magnitudes are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152889"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\b6c07939-28e4-4626-a845-03d9e05ac833.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="9-7500414\dde8732a-ed48-428e-8c3b-7003203a2511.jpg" /> is the Planckian mass. Having in mind these constrains, consider the case when</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152890"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\74872549-c124-4934-9846-5adb88c14078.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Moreover, for our model the inequalities (15) take place if<img src="9-7500414\73213da6-466a-4374-b996-822945b17f64.jpg" />. Conditions (10) indicate that energy of basic field <img src="9-7500414\b72a854f-e1b3-4ec8-891b-746884c39324.jpg" /> is essentially larger than energy of additional field<img src="9-7500414\83968125-26c8-4ceb-8090-cf215bc99f89.jpg" />. Under this assumption the system (9)-(10) takes on more simple form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152891"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\cfbf9f4a-08d9-4ed5-a430-82f852042df8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (11) reduce to one linear differential equation of the second order <img src="9-7500414\90fe5e4e-9e5c-4619-8a85-95936e72fce7.jpg" /> with coefficients<img src="9-7500414\2d34587b-ebb8-4052-9cf6-b2610f31dc8a.jpg" />,<img src="9-7500414\fa01dc67-7cc3-424b-912e-9b7958297043.jpg" />. Its solutions we’ll look for in the standard exponential form<img src="9-7500414\2f92a2ee-f238-4ea2-b3b1-e6c59c4d4b16.jpg" />. Hence, we get the algebraic equation <img src="9-7500414\debff748-b74e-4338-ad7d-0fc6e61990be.jpg" /> that has two roots:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152892"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\e82d9f86-60a9-47aa-9e85-d8fa482c39d5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (9) and (10) it follows that<img src="9-7500414\77415eb0-aa15-4999-b6e9-0feed3400c9d.jpg" />. This condition allows to decompose the expression under root sign into the Taylor series with respect to small value<img src="9-7500414\79bf9748-28db-47ff-ba3e-af3c266ed83b.jpg" />, and to get two solutions</p><p><img src="9-7500414\827c53d9-9fde-4437-bdcb-0a1ada5aa14d.jpg" />,<img src="9-7500414\0cba719a-fd40-4f68-99a6-143253edc8b8.jpg" /> (13)</p><p>Note also, that second of them is the approximate solution of zeroth accuracy with respect to the ratio<img src="9-7500414\00079d65-1ad2-4982-a1ba-f33731426cd2.jpg" />. Thus the sought-for solutions of field <img src="9-7500414\4be0ffb4-c123-451a-82af-7cf903e1af34.jpg" /> we may take in the forms</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152893"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\36051285-e95f-47ea-92e7-dfa14304ffdc.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152894"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\338e96bf-04dc-46c3-ab55-d065bbeb213f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (9)-(11) it is unproblematic to find the additives to energy density and to pressure</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152895"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\34a375cd-f851-498d-aebe-0711a823bbcf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152896"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\5afb7259-0e1c-4748-bd11-295c35debf61.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>while the main items are</p><p><img src="9-7500414\433c52a8-2bf3-4de1-ac28-3a13a2bd4291.jpg" />,<img src="9-7500414\d5e5ffc5-926e-4f4d-995b-366e851a7553.jpg" /> (18)</p><p>From (16)-(18) it is easy to verify that these two scalar fields describe the quintessence field. In fact, from (2) we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152897"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\f54957f5-dd86-4415-a934-b48e3b9132d8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Due to condition (6) and (18) we see that ordinary scalar field <img src="9-7500414\7b348483-0d92-4454-851b-89da9c89ca0f.jpg" /> is in the vacuum state, i.e.,<img src="9-7500414\ce19998e-31b9-4433-9da3-ee6d11e76c84.jpg" />. Hence</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152898"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\1660e64f-a45c-4685-8834-fe796090068a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore two coupled scalar fields describe the quintessential state of dark energy.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Scalar Field <img src="9-7500414\2ff994cc-1187-48a1-88b6-9a3abfabc7c7.jpg" /> Evolution</title><p>Let the fields <img src="9-7500414\5b36b37e-f1da-4390-b10e-5ae43fa44033.jpg" /> and <img src="9-7500414\950e4ca0-e9b9-4fff-9fbe-31ffd794b607.jpg" /> possess any space inhomogeneity. (Another type of the inhomogeneous quintessence model has been proposed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref26">26</xref>].) Under the conditions<img src="9-7500414\eb40cd5e-9c23-45cc-9e33-924c7a3768d2.jpg" />, <img src="9-7500414\3cf030cc-e630-4a29-b55c-6659d3def7c5.jpg" />this leads to the system</p><p><img src="9-7500414\00e71c8d-0215-4f31-bd7b-630b1187169a.jpg" />(21)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152899"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\ad461c9a-ea8b-4f91-ad2c-bc7df6b6d515.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152900"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\6a76763e-eb19-4a1d-a6fd-d3423c1e77c9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here we take into account that<img src="9-7500414\fc19452f-507d-484d-8c15-c85a1b9cb2a1.jpg" />, also.</p><p>For solving this system put<img src="9-7500414\222bad6a-357d-4df6-b907-7d207c2cafdd.jpg" />, where<img src="9-7500414\0d1d02bd-3362-4839-8895-ade5d19c1554.jpg" />. Last expression indicates that perturbed potential is the plane wave with the timevariable amplitude, <img src="9-7500414\c76f7221-44d9-417d-bfe7-a24530f5549d.jpg" />its wave vector. Such choice is analogous to Jeans’ presentation of the perturbations in baryonic substrate.</p><p>Substitution all of them into Equation (23) will arrive it to the following one</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152901"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\13530c9a-7fdc-407b-9aa3-9c47c232cc72.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the nonzero right part. It is easy to see that</p><p><img src="9-7500414\caaa8462-fc4b-4b8d-a0b3-84d0eb8876fd.jpg" />. Hence the following equation leads from (24) one</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152902"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\6a7c8f51-9d13-4eee-b21e-db75e1db92c4.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>With the needed accuracy (<img src="9-7500414\06479a5e-0c9d-4655-bb77-ce644d82d572.jpg" />) we have</p><p><img src="9-7500414\c2ea8531-43f3-4309-a37e-21870eee936c.jpg" /></p><p>and <img src="9-7500414\514b289e-d294-43c0-a118-481ca039acd2.jpg" /> with arbitrary amplitude<img src="9-7500414\472a7de5-b123-4c44-8f4d-929984f1df5e.jpg" />. After neglecting the field self-interaction we get equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152903"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\c5768f75-409a-48bb-bf87-34b542c1cc1d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>whose exact partial solution, in accordance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref27">27</xref>], expresses as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152904"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\e318e4aa-b5ae-4e7e-be37-ebd6ece2fcac.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="9-7500414\1f6d857e-a33d-4ba7-b738-2c30c3c6d6d9.jpg" /></p><p>is the index of Bessel function, <img src="9-7500414\c0af13c4-da74-4a4d-9764-d8bbe2386684.jpg" />is an arbitrary constant.</p><p>Let <img src="9-7500414\590ddc4f-7e8f-4a53-95ec-4676a23e0df1.jpg" /></p><p>for simplicity, then <img src="9-7500414\8db88f2d-9536-4224-b71e-c3f5272449f7.jpg" /> and</p><p><img src="9-7500414\7d42d55a-0e14-4cdd-9ba8-881c7d3ee3f7.jpg" />. Furthermoreassuming that<img src="9-7500414\d1e51f92-c820-4658-9aad-7c0f9564e49a.jpg" />, the field potential takes on the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152905"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\dd347944-f33f-455b-932c-a42894f1915d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now examine the behavior of this function in time. Let <img src="9-7500414\6853a747-ee22-4e08-9270-416c2116f6e0.jpg" /> is the dimensionless time. Using the numerical and the graphical representations of Bessel functions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref28">28</xref>] we see that at large argument (<img src="9-7500414\587dbee7-2938-406a-a750-31d891bb07b4.jpg" />) function<img src="9-7500414\7a304c23-5c21-4344-a8b0-7478b906b8ad.jpg" />. However, for our purpose we must consider the opposite situation when<img src="9-7500414\6fbb47d8-6fbd-4a05-be0d-74cc577e4234.jpg" />.</p><p>For doing this consider the series representation of Bessel function of zeroth order</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152906"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\93e89820-c923-4afb-a7b6-dad47fdca5ff.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and limit ourselves by first two terms only, because it rapidly (~<img src="9-7500414\e83f00e0-85e8-4485-9418-e4cf6a43dd49.jpg" />) decreases with <img src="9-7500414\147b8e4f-54e6-41a1-b80a-125cc5dff648.jpg" /> growing. Hence,</p><p><img src="9-7500414\ca54ffd3-fa1f-4f93-a8fa-ac61d31d181d.jpg" /></p><p>and function (28) reduces to the next one</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152907"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\3b5a0413-8546-4714-b8e4-18a7db753573.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>if<img src="9-7500414\129f380a-5b4b-4ac8-b07c-9cd1e662fdc7.jpg" />. This important result—time-increasing amplitude—allows lighting the process of baryonic matter’s macroscopic perturbations growth from new side.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Influence of Field <img src="9-7500414\a391b41e-a4c4-4600-b4ea-45aab5afc5a2.jpg" /> on the Baryonic Matter’s Density Perturbations Growing</title><p>Our next step is searching the influence of field <img src="9-7500414\2fa7412e-1120-4ad2-8cae-05d5de183296.jpg" /> on the baryonic matter’s density perturbations growing. Later on we’ll base on the Jeans equations for adiabatic case.</p><p>In the usual designations (together with the equation of state for baryonic matter<img src="9-7500414\8b81c060-d88f-48ed-91b4-d5abfdc29b4a.jpg" />) they are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152908"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\674bd3f7-b750-4c44-99bc-f78494b0b886.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152909"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\66aca5b0-914b-44b0-a188-58964c9aa030.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152910"><label>. (33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\0c84bdd9-1d83-4f49-b9bf-3b1681c64367.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For enriching our goal it is necessary to use the wellknown method of description the poly-components fluid dynamics. Namely, for searching the microscopic perturbations of baryonic matter specify them in the standard manner [29,30]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152911"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\7ec1706f-901d-4923-b748-fded110f0b0c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152912"><label>, (35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\b2e590d1-7aa2-466a-909e-2f7b92ddc7d9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152913"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\7b53d910-9ded-4e0f-8ffa-708990833587.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="9-7500414\ec2d7574-2881-4001-857a-b2d650c3f877.jpg" />(37)</p><p>Beside, as we consider the influence of baryonic matter on the background of phantom field, it is needed to take into account that last will contribute its additions at the pressure <img src="9-7500414\94e20393-fadd-48ac-8800-040e9804b053.jpg" /> and at the mass density<img src="9-7500414\9526a889-f346-481e-ac5b-713ce41335f5.jpg" />. Hence, <img src="9-7500414\70970f02-d8bd-49ad-9ba1-4b7e97470de9.jpg" />, and<img src="9-7500414\8cce6901-3f8d-4a72-89cd-c018ab7a244c.jpg" />. Moreover, according our assumption we have</p><p><img src="9-7500414\98fbafa4-e725-40db-9525-aab713575eab.jpg" />,<img src="9-7500414\d24fb2b2-23cf-4767-b825-4ab71650e0b2.jpg" /> (38)</p><p><img src="9-7500414\d9aa64ed-8644-431e-bb9d-d4d6064f532a.jpg" />,<img src="9-7500414\f89b782c-8f54-4eef-b748-52b10066d00d.jpg" /> (39)</p><p>where<img src="9-7500414\4b7d760a-1ee5-41d2-85eb-8dde2a7ba219.jpg" />, <img src="9-7500414\ca179d79-928a-44fe-ad4a-0ef417c02246.jpg" />, <img src="9-7500414\41d95a1c-5ad8-412b-a53b-f1f2b5b14cdb.jpg" />and <img src="9-7500414\c6ce4d07-3381-4d48-93dd-154484584f55.jpg" /> are the small perturbed additions to initials mass densities<img src="9-7500414\3cd681e4-cc35-488d-bd23-b9cb872c86e5.jpg" />, <img src="9-7500414\da7bc465-18e0-4a16-917f-cdb6ca567734.jpg" />and to initial pressures<img src="9-7500414\5f08d484-16b0-48d8-81b6-2fa6da8e7377.jpg" />,<img src="9-7500414\8f5a6289-b674-4a34-9a3a-f58dcb6b72cc.jpg" />. In our case, the main terms for mass density and for pressure, that associated with vacuum and determined by the field<img src="9-7500414\311c3ce0-3ecd-4158-9a38-783abb5b185e.jpg" />, are</p><p><img src="9-7500414\5979f813-75f6-4e37-874d-239149f1cf1e.jpg" />, <img src="9-7500414\a2325fa5-6360-4471-8052-6e499160d117.jpg" />(40)</p><p>while the corresponding additions have the forms (we neglect the fields interaction, for simplicity)</p><p><img src="9-7500414\4602920f-3403-41f5-9f08-e52bd80d1100.jpg" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152914"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\c10c86d5-c5dc-420b-89c1-b48ece18dd65.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>That is why the variables in (34)-(37) may be represent as</p><p><img src="9-7500414\f601d7ad-10a4-432e-b165-6834e565a2d0.jpg" />(43)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152915"><label>(44)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\8d089630-0212-420c-898d-78eff329be5a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152916"><label>(45)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\4af7df64-09d4-43f3-bb2c-2cd2e40d468d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="9-7500414\9872b214-3af3-47c3-a46b-712d574724f3.jpg" /></p><p><img src="9-7500414\6e753c69-3aeb-454b-9ea9-850471cf1598.jpg" />(46)</p><p>where we assume that speeds of sound in a baryonic matter and in the quintessence field are equal each other, i.e.,<img src="9-7500414\e3f49782-d841-4c85-8224-db6ac2d8863c.jpg" />. Beside, for next simplification let <img src="9-7500414\2f42105e-7ac2-4ef2-9316-c440c7bd2f8d.jpg" /> (in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref31">31</xref>] it was considered the bi-velocities type of fluid with special nonzero components) and for the case of dust-like baryonic substance imply that<img src="9-7500414\2929ff3d-a023-4e34-adba-2330b372d5b9.jpg" />. Whence it results<img src="9-7500414\5de575d9-13e0-47a7-bab8-dded6562c5ec.jpg" />,<img src="9-7500414\be2a2b8d-f6da-4641-b044-805499fdad6f.jpg" />.</p><p>Substituting (43)-(45) into (31)-(33) and making required transformations, we get the dynamical equation of two-component media.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152917"><label>(47)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\9ea3cb91-408b-4839-8455-2f368fc6eea6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="9-7500414\44f88d59-463f-440c-84d9-0d2702d97d62.jpg" /></p><p>Later on, assuming that <img src="9-7500414\36f6a28d-fda9-412d-8426-edf38adfc963.jpg" /> and accounting (46) the previous equation goes into</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152918"><label>(48)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\9096bb26-1412-4d6c-9bb8-64a1adb1eb15.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The most attractive consequence of this equation, that has the evolutionary nature, we get after the omitting constant values in third term and replacing</p><p><img src="9-7500414\55f40853-2859-4b28-b96c-4da4d2e76022.jpg" />by <img src="9-7500414\11b8dc72-2956-4c67-8dda-6eb2e414244b.jpg" /></p><p>(due to minuteness <img src="9-7500414\3a63e10b-44f4-49c4-8379-e32506fd0d5b.jpg" /> here and after). Thus the standard equation of forced oscillations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152919"><label>(49)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\f63f214a-f2c0-4548-9024-431ffae40df9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>takes place, where</p><p><img src="9-7500414\0f95d1cd-b540-4f21-b38d-82658c5fdf14.jpg" /></p><p>is the basic internal frequency,</p><p><img src="9-7500414\4f3a023d-73b6-4864-a259-71dc9f65d80f.jpg" />and <img src="9-7500414\7fca47d4-90e0-4811-ab39-0a6af65f9d59.jpg" /> are the externals frequency and amplitude, accordingly.</p><p>Now it should be pointed out that condition</p><p><img src="9-7500414\f9a18874-d6f1-4157-ac20-ab16cc5e2829.jpg" /></p><p>relates to the resonance case. Hence, the amplitude of baryonic matter’s density perturbations gets the strong short-time splash. This result is very significant, because the splash may be real macroscopic mechanism of an initial matter density perturbations appearance. Moreover, the above mention condition determines the resonancecase wave vector</p><p><img src="9-7500414\4b0a0585-6cdf-4c20-bd85-027439e231ee.jpg" />.</p><p>In other—nonresonance—cases (<img src="9-7500414\5a4a5b38-c806-4ff2-af87-e9399bdfcee4.jpg" />) the amplitude of oscillations, according standard theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref32">32</xref>], at times <img src="9-7500414\01d01ed0-7a94-4789-9590-81f2263ab870.jpg" /> (see Section 3) becomes growth linearly, i.e.<img src="9-7500414\dbb34bbc-2725-44c6-93e7-a45657e957d2.jpg" />. So, it stimulates the process of matter’s density perturbations increasing (see next Section 5).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Effect of Stimulation the Baryonic Matter Density Perturbations Growing</title><p>Point out that according to above considered behavior of field <img src="9-7500414\9c554043-b853-4a0b-8ae0-d7bd755463eb.jpg" /> (Equations (13) or (39)) it is necessary to generalize Equation (47) in the similar manner. The result is obvious</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152920"><label>(50)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\c99156b4-1b43-4e77-b8a1-a6344151109a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the Hubble constant is</p><p><img src="9-7500414\0700c832-0830-4502-bfef-d3391186d8a9.jpg" />.</p><p>The “friction term” in right side of (50) will alter the amplitude and frequency of forced oscillations in (49) owing to previous results, but don’t change the key conclusion of Section 4—the linear time-growing of baryonic matter’s perturbations. As for the “friction term” in left side of (50) it is necessary to say follow.</p><p>The problem of baryonic matter perturbations growing in the dust-like Universe with nonvariable Hubble constant was considered in number of recent articles (see, for example [33-38]). But their common result adequate to those in [29,30]—the amplitude of perturbations increases as different powers of time, i.e., <img src="9-7500414\8ca009f1-3392-4d91-bd2c-98280f92d070.jpg" />, where, in particular,</p><p><img src="9-7500414\b947acc2-4fb0-4f42-9dac-478325beb285.jpg" />etc. More complicate results take place when Hubble constant is the time-varying value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref39">39</xref>]. For instance, in article [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.6678-ref40">40</xref>] it was shown that then</p><p><img src="9-7500414\48308e6f-1af6-441d-a415-650687cf5486.jpg" />.</p><p>Summarize, in all of these cases the “friction term”</p><p><img src="9-7500414\39ff2d61-83a7-4805-834f-300fc79425e3.jpg" /></p><p>at Jeans-like equation leads to main consequence—the growing of baryonic matter perturbations in the expanding Universe.</p><p>Hence, for baryonic Universe the matter density perturbation will develop in time more rapidly, namely as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.6678-formula152921"><label>(51)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="9-7500414\850e49b6-9ee5-4770-94eb-809a429b129d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="9-7500414\a88daa62-1e6b-4b20-b716-d36056b68e37.jpg" />and <img src="9-7500414\a48d0810-293f-40b7-a932-902a617ed5a2.jpg" /> are any suitable constants.</p><p>That is why our result describes the effect of stimulation the baryonic matter’s density perturbations growing by quintessence field.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>Here it was shown that for deeper searching the process of baryonic matter evolution in the expanding Universe it is necessary to:</p><p>1) know the physical property of concrete field (or fields) that represents the background of nonbaryonic substrate type of dark energy, and 2) take into account the influence of such field on the continuous medium of baryonic matter.</p><p>In our article these statements were realized for the quintessential field. As the result we describe quintessence by two gravitating scalar fields. First of them is the invariable field<img src="9-7500414\f7b1f7be-6a9f-4626-a3b7-3b0a5199f136.jpg" />, while the second evolves as the space-wave with linearly growing amplitude (30). These fields give their contributions at the total pressure <img src="9-7500414\5d21d051-2fe3-48b6-b745-8ad3fec3dd56.jpg" /> and at the total mass density <img src="9-7500414\9f98f0a9-f4ca-4117-aea4-ae03e7cd4c3b.jpg" /> of baryonic matter. As a consequence the evolution of baryonic matter density perturbations obeys the standard equation of forced oscillations (49) and admits the resonance case, when amplitude of baryonic matter density perturbations gets the strong short-time splash. This splash was interpreted as the macroscopic mechanism of initial matter’s density perturbations appearance.</p><p>In other—nonresonance—cases the amplitude of oscillations becomes growth linearly in time. That is why it also may stimulate the process of matter density perturbations increasing accord the expression (51).</p><p>As a result it is possible to say that quintessence field highly actively affects on the baryonic matter’s density perturbation growing in the Universe.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.6678-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. L. Ginzburg, “On Some Advances in Physics and Astron-omy over the Past Three Years,” Physics–Uspekhi (Advances in Physics Sciences), Vol. 45, No. 2, 2002, pp. 205-211. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Sandage, “The Universe at Large,” In: G. Munch, A. Mampaso and F. Sanchez, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ya. B. Zel’dovich and I. D. Novikov, “Relativistic Astrophysics,” Vol. 2, Chicago Press, Chicago, 1983. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Padmanabhan, “Structure Formation in the Universe,” Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Dvali, A. Gruzinov and M. Zaldarriaga, “Cosmological Perturbations from Reheating, Freezeout, and Mass Domination,” Physical Review D, Vol. 69, 2003, 023505, [arXiv:astro-ph/00306052]. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Polarsky and R. Gannouji, “On the Growth of Linear Perturbations,” Physics Letters, Vol. B660, 2008, p. 439; arXiv: 0710.1510v2 [astro-ph] 11 October 2007, pp. 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Verheest, P. K. Shukla, G. Jacobs and V. V. Yaroshenko, “Jeans Instability in Partially Ionized Self- Gravitating Dusty Plasmas”, Physical Review E, Vol. 68, 2003, pp. 1-4. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. C. Johnson and M. Kamionkowski, “Dynamical and Gravita-tional Instability of Oscillating-Field Dark Energy and Dark Matter,” Physical Review D, Vol. 78, 2008, pp. 1-9. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. A. Thompson, “Gravitational Instability in Radiation Pres-sure-Dominated Backgrounds,” Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 684, No. 1, 2008, pp. 212- 225. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. K. S. Dunsby, “Gauge-Invariant Perturbations in Multi-Component Fluid Cosmologies,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, Vol. 8, 1991, pp. 1785-1806. 
doi:10.1088/0264-9381/8/10/006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. T. Chyornyj, “The Relativistic Models of Continuous Media,” Nauka, Moscow, 1983, (in Russian);</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> S. A. Serov and S. S. Serova, “Multi-Component Gas-Dynamics and Turbulence,” 2005, E-print, arXiv: physics/0503215.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Bartolo, P.-S. Corasaniti, A. Liddle and M. Malquarti, “Perturbations in Cosmologies with a Scalar Field and a Perfect Fluid,” Physical Review D, Vol. 70, 2004, 043532, arXiv: astro-ph/0311503v3, 22 April, 2004, pp. 1-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. De la Macorra, “Interacting Dark Energy: Generic Cosmological Evolution for Two Scalar Fields,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 1, 2008, p. 30. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/01/030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Unnikrishnan, H. K. Jassal and T. R. Seshadri, “Scalar Field Dark Energy Perturbations and Their Scale Dependence,” Vol. 78, No. 12, 2008, pp. 1-12. 
arXiv: astro-ph 0801.2017v3, </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. Koivisto, “Growth of Perturbations in Dark Matter Coupled with Quintessence,” 2005, pp. 1-14, arXiv: astro-ph/0504571v2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Sahni and W. Limin, “A New Cos- mological Model of Quintessence and Dark Matter,” Physical Review, Vol. D62, 1999, pp. 1-4, arXiv:astro-ph/9910097v3. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. J. E. Peebles and A. Vilenkin, “Noninteracting Dark Matter,” 1998, pp. 1-9. arXiv:astro-ph/981059v1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. S. Alcaniz and J. A. S. Lima, “Dark Energy and the Epoch of Galaxy Formation,” The As-trophysical Journal, Vol. 550, No. 1, 2001, pp. L133-L136. 
doi:10.1086/319642</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. C. Bento, O. Bertolami and N. C. Santos, “A Two- Field Quintessence Model,” Physical Review D, Vol. 65, No. 6, 2002, pp. 1-4. arXiv:astro-ph/0106405v2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">X.-F. Zhang, H. Li, Y.-S. Piao and X. M. Zhang, “Two- Field Models of Dark Energy with Equation of State Across-1,” Modern Physics Letters A, Vol. 21, 2005, pp. 1-5. arXiv:astro-ph/050152v1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. I. Po-dol’sky, “On the Equation of State for the Λ Field,” Astronomy Letters, Vol. 28, No. 7, 2002, pp. 434- 437. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. J. Cope-land, M. Sami and Sh. Tsujikawa, “Dynamics of Dark Energy,” International Journal of Modern Physics D, Vol. 15, No. 11, pp. 1-94. 
arXiv: hep-th/0603057v3 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. D. Chernin, “Cosmic Vac-uum,” Physics-Uspekhi, (Ad- vances in Physical Sciences), Vol. 44, No. 11, 2001, pp. 1099-1118.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. D. Linde, “Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology,” Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. J. Nunes and D. F. Mota, “Structure Formation in In- homogeneous Dark Energy Mod-els,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 368, 2006, pp. 751- 758. arXiv:astro-ph/0409481v2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Kamke, “Differentialgleichungen: L?sungsmethoden und L?sungen,” Leipzig, 1959.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. A. Watson, “Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions,” 2nd Edition, CUP, 1944.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. J. E. Peebles, “Physical Cosmology,” Princeton University, Princeton, 1971. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Weinberg, “Gravitation and Cos-mology,” John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., New York, London, Syd-ney and Toronto, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Brenner, “A Critical Test of Bivelocity Hydrodynamics for Mixtures,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 133, No. 15, 2010, pp. 154102-154102-8. 
doi:10.1063/1.3494028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, “Mechanics,” Nauka, Moscow, 1958, (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. D. Chernin, D. I. Nagirner and S. V. Starikova, “Growth Rate of Cosmological Perturbations in Standard Model: Explicit Ana-lytical Solution,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 399, No. 1, 2003, pp. 19-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. Munshi, C. Porciani and Yun Wang, “Galaxy Clustering and Dark Energy,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 349, No. 1, 2004, pp. 281-290. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. Linder and A. Jenkins, “The Cosmological Simulation Code GADGET-2,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 346, No. 2, 2003, pp. 573-583.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> W. J. Persival, “Cosmological Structure Forma-tion in a Homogeneous Dark Energy Background,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 443, No. 3, 2005, pp. 819-830.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple"> L. Wang and P. Steinhardt, “Cluster Abundance Constraints on Quintessence Models,” Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 508, 1998, pp. 483-490. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. J. Nunes, A. S. da Silva and N. Aghanim, “Number Counts in Homogeneous and Inhomogeneous Dark Energy Models,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 450, No. 3, 2006, pp. 899-907. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053706</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Basilakos, “Cosmological Implications and Structure Forma-tion from a Time Varying Vacuum,” Vol. 395, 2009, pp. 1-10. arXiv:0903.0452v1 [astro-ph. CO] </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.6678-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. M. Chechin, “An-tigravitational Instability of Cosmic Substrate in Newtonian Cosmology,” Chinese Physics Letters, Vol. 23, No. 8, 2006, pp. 2344-2347. 
doi:10.1088/0256-307X/23/8/104</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>