<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Earthquake Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2169-9623</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojer.2016.52008</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJER-66690</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Measuring Crustal Lg-Waves Attenuation in the Northern Part of Africa
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>doum</surname><given-names>Issak</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christian</surname><given-names>Camerlynck</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 6, Paris, France</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculté des Sciences Exactes et Appliquées, N’Djamena, Tchad</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>isacusfr@yahoo.fr(DI)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>05</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>105</fpage><lpage>113</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>7</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>21</month>	<year>May</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Lg-waves propagate over long distances in the northern part of Africa and are recorded on the seismic station located close to Abeche (Chad). We have applied the well-known coda analysis method developed by Aki and Chouet [1] to study the Lg-wave anelastic attenuation in this area. We found a frequency dependence: Q( f ) = (650
  &#177;34) f 
  <sup>(0.77&#177;0.2)</sup>. This result shows an average value of Q0 (Q0 ≈ 650) for earthquakes occurred in tectonic areas as the East African Rift system, Turkey, Greece and Red Sea. The higher value of Q0 (Q0 ≈ 800) is obtained for the event occurred in the middle of the stable plate close to the Tamanrasset (TAM) station in Algeria.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Lg-Wave Attenuation</kwd><kwd> Coda</kwd><kwd> Q Factor</kwd><kwd> North Africa</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction-Objectives</title><p>Attenuation of regional seismic waves has been studied for years from various points of view including theoretical researches and numerous applied researches in various geophysical environments. Among these studies, Lg-waves have often been studied in order to characterize continental crust, because these wavetrains are often those which carry the most part of the seismic energy. Resulting from both theoretical and observational studies, it is now widely recognized that attenuation of Lg-waves can be represented by two terms:</p><p>・ The first one only represents the conservation of energy as a function of distance from the source. Thereby, this geometrical attenuation is simply represented by a decaying function of distance: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>characterized by a unique value<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>・ The second one represents all the effects of inelastic attenuation, such as energy loss or energy redistribution such as scattering. This term is represented by a function of distance and frequency, controlled a quality factor Q, which appears to also depend on frequency: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Aki (1969) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref4">4</xref>] was the first researcher who observed that the seismic Lg-coda could be fruitful to study this quality factor, even by the use of a unique station. From this key study, numerous theoretical studies have been conducted, in particular to try to separate the two origins of inelastic attenuation. This is still a difficult problem, because the theoretical models are very similar. Nevertheless, some authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref7">7</xref>] have shown using simulation that the early part of the coda is mainly controlled by scattering attenuation, and the late coda is controlled by intrinsic attenuation. Also, observations of Lg-codas have been used to measure the Lg Q-factor in various crustal structures. As a general rule, in tectonic areas, Q<sub>0</sub> can be less than 100, and strongly depends on frequency with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> close to 1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref8">8</xref>] but in the opposite, in stable areas such as cratons, Q<sub>0</sub> can be as high as one or 2000 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref3">3</xref>] and slightly depends on frequency with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> nearly equal to 0.1. Due to an evident lack of seismicity, and consequently often a lack of stations, in theses stable areas, the Q factor is not documented as well as in tectonic areas. In particular, in North Africa, most of the studies are carried out on the borders of the continent:</p><p>・ Using seismic networks in Spain and Morocco, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref9">9</xref>] had established a map of the propagation efficiency of Lg and Sn waves between the north of Africa and the south of Europe;</p><p>・ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref8">8</xref>] proposed a tomography of Lg wave attenuation from Turkey to Arabia, leading to strong variations of the quality factor, less than 100 in the western and eastern parts of Turkey, and between 600 and 800 in the Arabian plate;</p><p>・ The East African Plateau had been studied by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref10">10</xref>] who had tried to separate intrinsic and scattering Q, leading to Q<sub>I</sub> between 300 and 600, and Q<sub>S</sub> between 1000 and 2000;</p><p>・ Finally, in the south-west, in the area of Mount Cameroon, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref11">11</xref>] used a local network and the local seismicity which is detected to study attenuation close to the volcano: they found a very low attenuation:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>From 2007, a broadband seismic station has been installed in Chad close to the city of Abeche in the eastern part of the country, and is operated by the University of N’Djamena. Recording well developed Lg-wavetrains generated by earthquakes located in the tectonic areas surrounding the north of Africa, this station can be efficiently used to study the Lg Q-factor in this wide stable area. In the following, we successively present the used dataset, the processing method and finally discuss the results.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Data</title><p>The seismic station is ideally situated in the middle of the Nubian plate, which is mainly composed of different cratons and various old geological features, their story beginning during the proterozoic era. The oldest Archean cratons in Africa (West Africa, Congo and Kalahari) are separated by more weak grounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref12">12</xref>] which exhibit a little seismicity, such as the Sirt basin, the North of Egypt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref13">13</xref>] and the volcanic line of mount Cameroon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref14">14</xref>] . A little seismic activity is also found along the coast line and along the passive Atlantic margin. Not yet fully understood, this seismicity cannot be explained by the velocity inside the Nubian plate (less than 0.6 mm/year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref15">15</xref>] : much lower than the velocities which can be observed on the edges of the Nubian plate: the convergence velocity between Nubia and Eurasia is close to 5 mm/year, and can reach up to 25 mm/year at the south of the Hellenic arc). To the east, Nubia is going away of Arabia at roughly 20 mm/year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref16">16</xref>] and the divergence velocity through the East African Rift ranges from 6 to 3 mm/year from North to South [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>This situation explains that the events recorded by the ABC (Abeche) seismic station are mainly located far from the station, more precisely at distances greater than 1700 km (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Nevertheless, due to a very low seismic noise, as shown by <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, most of them have developed a well-defined Lg wave train followed by a long duration coda, as shown by the top part of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. From all these events, we have selected those for which an Lg-wavetrain can be clearly identified. These events are shown by colored dots on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, color representing magnitude. Then, it appears that some seismic areas cannot be investigated, due to the lack of Lg waves such as the events located south of Italy for which the path travels through the oceanic crust lying between Italy and Africa, which extends also a bit between Greece and Africa. Finally, some events occurred off the western coast of Africa near Morocco; these are low magnitude events, very far from our station, which does not record any available coda.</p><p>Furthermore, the special case of the event located in south Algeria, close to the city of Tamanrasset, is of major interest. This mb 4.2 event clearly occurs in a very stable area; it is well recorded in the ABC station as shown by <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. Fortunately, a seismic station, operated by the GeoScope French institute, is located close to the city. The recorded data show a very nice record of this event, as shown by the bottom part of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. This record</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Geographical distribution of the studied events (circles) and Chad station ABC (diamond) displayed on a map of Africa; black little crosses indicate the natural seismicity (magnitude greater than 4) during the studied timeframe</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x13.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Averaged (median) background seismic noise for ABC station (black line), compared with the Peterson’s noise model (NLNM, 1993) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref18">18</xref>] (dotted line)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x14.png"/></fig><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Records and time-frequency distribution of energy for the Tamanrasset event; top: Chad station (ABC), bottom: Tamanrasset station (TAM).</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x15.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x16.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>exhibits a well developed coda ranging at least 600 s, very fruitful for coda-Q measurement.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Processing</title><p>As described in the introduction, we have used the original model of coda decay, proposed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66690-ref4">4</xref>] in which the amplitude is represented by a function of frequency and time as follows:</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In this equation, C(f) is the source term, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the geometrical attenuation and Q<sub>c</sub> characterises the effects of inelasticity. For each frequency band centered around frequency f, the logarithm of the envelope of the filtered coda, computed by a smoothed Hilbert transform, is fitted by a straight line, the slope of which representing the Q<sub>c</sub> factor for frequency f (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>The frequency bands are organised by a logarithmic scale, covering the range [0.1; 5] Hz. However, depending on the events, the available frequency bands are limited for most of them to the [0.5; 2] Hz band.</p><p>Finally, for each event we compute the frequency dependency of Q<sub>c</sub> (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>), as shown by <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, in which the retained values of Q are chosen manually before computing the linear regression.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Estimating the Stability of the Results</title><p>In order to evaluate the stability of the processing, we have selected 6 events which occurred in the same area (south of Kenya) at a distance of roughly 3000 km from the station. These events occurred the same day (i.e. December 6, 2009), and their magnitudes range from 4.5 to 5.0. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> gives the results in terms of Q<sub>0</sub> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> coefficients. It shows that the Q<sub>0</sub> factor is more stable (i.e. 718 &#177; 7) than (i.e. 0.6 &#177; 0.1), which can be explained by the low range of available frequencies.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Global and Regional Results</title><p>The results for the global dataset (namely 70 events) are presented on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> by a color scale. In order to</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> For each frequency band, centered on the f<sub>0</sub> frequency displayed at the top of each plot, the logarithm of the coda envelope is represented by a color curve and the smoothed coda by a black curve; the white line, delimited by the vertical dashed lines, is the portion of coda which is used for computing the Q value</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x21.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Final estimation of Q<sub>c</sub> factor: the red circles are the Q<sub>c</sub> estimated by the fit of the linear part of the coda; the black line is the best linear fit of the selected values delimited by the two vertical dashed lines. The blue dots are the Q<sub>c</sub> values which are not selected</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x22.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Results obtained for 6 events located close to one another showing the dispersion of the results</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Date</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Origin time</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Magnitude (mb)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Q<sub>0</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >06/12/2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17:36:35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >722</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >06/12/2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18:29:14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >730</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >06/12/2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17:40:12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >717</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >06/12/2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18:00:00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >711</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >06/12/2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17:58:14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >715</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >06/12/2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19:36:40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >718</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>estimate some regional effects, we have grouped the events by region and computed average values of Q<sub>0</sub> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> presents these values.</p><p>Although the values are not very different from one region to others, we can see that the lowest values are obtained for events in Turkey, according to a propagation partly in the oceanic crust in the central Mediterranean Sea, and the highest ones are obtained for the events in the East African Rift, in the considerable exception of the event located close to Tamanrasset in South Algeria, discussed in the following section.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Special Case of Tamanrasset Event</title><p>As discussed earlier, this event is very particular because it occurred in the middle of the stable plate, providing a path fully included into the continental plate. Fortunately, the GeoScope French global network operates a station close to Tamanrasset, which has recorded this event. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows time-frequency plots of the records at both stations; they show a well-developed coda ranging to at least 400 s after the Lg arrival-time for the Chad station, and more than 500 s for the Tamanrasset station. Finally, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> gives the parameters resulting from the processing. Despite the very different distances of propagation, these results show very similar values for both Q<sub>0</sub> and a. This is a strong indication that our measures of Q<sub>0</sub> correspond to an averaged value available for</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Geographical representation of the Q<sub>0</sub> factor obtained for each event (color scale)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x24.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Averaged results for the main regions of interest and for the global dataset</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Region</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >#Events</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Averaged Q<sub>0</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Averaged a</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Greece and Turkey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >617 &#177; 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72 &#177; 0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >East African Rifts</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >690&#177; 42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70 &#177; 0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red Sea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >645 &#177; 18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70 &#177; 0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >North Africa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >650 &#177; 18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92 &#177; 0.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Full dataset</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >650 &#177; 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77 &#177; 0.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Q<sub>0</sub> and a parameters obtained for the Tamanrasset earthquake at Chad (ABC) and Tamanrasset (TAM) stations</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Station</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Q<sub>0</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Epicentral distance (Dkm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TAM (Z component)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >798.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TAM (North component)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >797.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TAM (East component)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >798.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ABC (Z component)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >794.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1822</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>the whole stable crust of the northern part of Africa.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. 3-Component Results</title><p>The Chad station in Ab&#233;ch&#233; is equipped with a 3-component seismometer. In this section, we compare results obtained by the coda processing on each component.</p><p>Unfortunately, background seismic noise is often higher on horizontal components than on the vertical one.</p><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between Q<sub>c</sub> computed on the vertical and east components. The black line is the best linear fit assuming crossing 0</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x25.png"/></fig><p>This leads to a less important dataset; more precisely, only 30 of the original 70 events can be used to compute the horizontal Q<sub>c</sub> factor. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> is a plot of the resulting Q<sub>0</sub> for these events; the black line is the best linear fit assuming crossing 0; it leads to an averaged ratio very close to 1, suggesting that there is no evidence of any difference between vertical and horizontal coda generations.</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Discussion-Conclusion</title><p>We have taken advantage of the ideal situation of the seismic station ABC (Abeche, Tchad) in the center of the northern part of Africa, which is a quiet seismic area and a very stable tectonic plate. Seismicity is located in the outskirts of the plate, at distances often greater than 1500 km , mainly in the north and east directions. Due to this stability, Lg-waves can propagate in the crust over long distances and are then recorded on the ABC station. Lg-codas are then used to study attenuation of Lg-waves in the crust according to Aki’s formulation. For the whole area, we have found a frequency dependence described by the following formula: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2740107x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>similar values are obtained for the attenuation measured on horizontal components. However, some events lead to lower values indicating higher attenuation; they are located close to South Turkey, which is consistent with the fact that no Lg-waves are recorded at ABC for events located in this area. Finally, the largest value is obtained for an event located in the middle of the place close to the city of Tamanrasset. Using records of the station TAM located close to the event, we obtained a very similar value for the attenuation; this strongly validates that the obtained values represent the attenuation at the global scale.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Adoum Issak,Christian Camerlynck, (2016) Measuring Crustal Lg-Waves Attenuation in the Northern Part of Africa. Open Journal of Earthquake Research,05,105-113. doi: 10.4236/ojer.2016.52008</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.66690-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aki, K. and Chouet, B. (1975) Origin of Coda Waves: Source, Attenuation, and Scattering Effects. Journal of Geophysical Research, 80, 3322-3342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JB080i023p03322</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Woodgold</surname><given-names> C.R.D. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1990</year>)<article-title>Estimation of Q in Eastern Canada Using Coda Waves</article-title><source> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America April</source><volume> 80</volume>,<fpage> 411</fpage>-<lpage>429</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names> X.-Y. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2014</year>)<article-title>An Inversion of Lg-Wave Attenuation and Site Response from Seismic Spectral Ratios in the Eastern China Region</article-title><source> Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America</source><volume> 27</volume>,<fpage> 1389</fpage>-<lpage>1399</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aki, K. (1969) Analysis of the Seismic Coda of Local Earthquakes as Scattered Waves. Journal of Geophysical Research, 74, 615-631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JB074i002p00615</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abubakirov, I.R. and Gusev, A.A. (1990) Estimation of Scattering Properties of Lithosphere of Kamchatka Based on Monte Carlo Simulation of Record Envelope of a Near Earthquake. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 64, 52-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(90)90005-I</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoshiba, M. (1994) Simulation of Coda Wave Envelope in Depth Dependent Scattering and Absorption Structure. Geophysical Research Letters, 21, 2853-2856. &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94GL02718</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lacombe, C., Campillo, M., Paul, A. and Margerin, L. (2003) Separation of Intrinsic Absorption and Scattering Attenuation from Lg Coda Decay in Central France Using Acoustic Radiative Transfer Theory. Geophysical Journal International, 154, 417-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2003.01976.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ekmer, Z., Sandvol, E., Xie, J., Turkeli, N., Mitchell, B., Gasanov, A.H. and Yetirmishli, G. (2007) Crustal Attenuation within Turkish Plateau and Surrounding Regions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 97, 151-161.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/0120050227</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calvert, A., Sandvol, E., Seber, D. and Barazangi, D. (2000) Propagation of Regional Seismic Phases (Lg and Sn) and Pn Velocity Structure along the Africa-Iberia Plate Boundary Zone: Tectonic Implications. Geophysical Journal International, 142, 384-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00160.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jemberie, A.L. and Nyblade, A.A. (2009) Intrinsic and Scattering Q near 1 Hz across the East African Plateau. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 99, 3516-3524. &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/0120090062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ambeh, W.B., Fairhead, J.D. and Francis, D.J. (1989) Coda Q Estimates in the Mount Cameroun Region, West Africa. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 9, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(89)90002-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Begg, G.C., Griffin, W.L., Natapov, L.M., O’Reilly, S.Y., Grand, S.P., O’Neill, C.J., Hronsky, J.M.A., Poudjom Djomani, Y., Swain, C.J., Deen, T. and Bowden, P. (2009) The Lithospheric Architecture of Africa: Seismic Tomography, Mantle Petrology, and Tectonic Evolution. Geosphere, 5, 23-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/GES00179.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guiraud, R., Bosworth, W., Thierry, J. and Delplanque, A. (2005) Phanerozoic Geological Evolution of Northern and Central Africa: An Overview. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 43, 83-143.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.07.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tabod, C.T., Fairhead, J.D., Stuart, G.W., Ateba, B. and Ntepe, N. (1992) Seismicity of the Cameroon Volcanic Line, 1982-1990. Tectonophysics, 212, 303-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(92)90297-J</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saria, E., Calais, E., Altamimi, Z., Willis, P. and Farah, H. (2013) A New Velocity Field for Africa from Combined GPS and DORIS Space Geodetic Solutions: Contribution to the Definition of the African Reference Frame (AFREF). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118, 1677-1697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50137</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McClusky, S., Reilinger, R., Ogubazghi, G., Amleson, A., Healeb, B., Vernant, P., Sholan, J., Fisseha, S., Asfaw, L., Bendick, R. and Kogan, L. (2010) Kinematics of the Southern Red Sea-Afar Triple Junction and Implications for Plate Dynamics. Geophysical Research Letters, 37, Article ID: L05301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stamps, D.S., Calais, E., Saria, E., Hartnady, C., Nocquet, J.-M., Ebinger, C.J. and Fernandes, R.M. (2008) A Kinematic Model for the East African Rift. Geophysical Research Letters, 35, Article ID: L05304.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032781</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66690-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peterson, J. (1993) Observations and Modeling of Seismic Background Noise. U.S.G.S, Open File Report, 93-322, 95 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>