<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2016.79081</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-66657</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Hermitian vs &lt;i&gt;PT&lt;/i&gt;-Symmetric Scalar Yukawa Model
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ladimir</surname><given-names>E. Rochev</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>State Research Center of the Russian Federation, “Institute for High Energy Physics” of National Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute”, Protvino, Russia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rochev@ihep.ru</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>05</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>899</fpage><lpage>907</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>20</month>	<year>May</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p><html>
 <head></head>
 
  A comparative analysis of a model of complex scalar field 
  φ and real scalar field 
  χ with interaction 
  <img src="Edit_9a7b5b29-a8df-4232-a2c5-8f4203267318.bmp" alt="" /> for the real and purely imaginary values of coupling 
  g in perturbative and non-perturbative regions is provided. In contrast to the usual Hermitian version (real 
  g), which is asymptotically free and energetically unstable, the non-Hermitian 
  PT-symmetric theory (imaginary 
  g) is energetically stable and not asymptotically free. The non-perturbative approach based on Schwinger-Dyson equations reveals new interesting feature of the non-Hermitian model. While in the Hermitian version of theory the phion propagator has the non-physical non-isolated singularity in the Euclidean region of momenta, the non-Hermitian theory substantially free of this drawback, as the singularity moves in the pseudo-Euclidean region.
 
</html></p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Scalar Field Theory</kwd><kwd> Non-Hermitian Lagrangians</kwd><kwd> Schwinger-Dyson Equations</kwd><kwd> Asymptotic Behavior</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Non-Hermitian PT-symmetric quantum models, open at the end of the last century [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref1">1</xref>] , currently have a wide use in various fields of physics (see review [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref2">2</xref>] and references therein). For a quantum field theory the introduction into circulation the non-Hermitian PT-symmetric models is interesting as an extension of a narrow class of Hermitian models with acceptable physical and mathematical properties (such as stability, unitary, and renormalisability) and opens new possibilities for describing the properties of high-energy particles.</p><p>In works of Bender et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref4">4</xref>] the PT-symmetric model of a scalar field with the interaction <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has been investigated. As has long been known (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref5">5</xref>] ), the Hermitian version of this model is asymptotically free, but the unstability of the cubic interaction leads to the fact that models of this type previously considered exclusively as a methodical examples (see, for example [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref6">6</xref>] ). For the non-Hermitian version of this model with imaginary coupling, however, the main argument of the unstability―the cubic potential is unbounded below―becomes invalid since the set of complex numbers is not an ordered set. Moreover, in work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref3">3</xref>] , the arguments are given in favor of energy stability of the non-Hermitian model with cubic interaction. The analysis of Bender et al. (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref4">4</xref>] ) indicates that the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> theory is like a <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> theory: it is energetically stable, renormalized and has the trivial-type ultraviolet behavior, i.e., compared with the conventional <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> model, the PT-symmetric <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> theory exhibits new interesting properties.</p><p>In this paper we study the scalar Yukawa model, i.e., a model of a complex scalar field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (phion) and a real field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (chion) with the interaction<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This model is used in nuclear physics as a simplified version of the Yukawa model without spin degrees of freedom, as well as an effective model of the interaction of scalar quarks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref8">8</xref>] . If the coupling constant g takes purely imaginary values and the field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a pseudoscalar, such a model is PT-symmetric. As expected, this model is a very similar to the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> theory. All arguments of Bender et al. (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref3">3</xref>] ) concerning the unstability of the Hermitian theory and stability of non-Hermitian PT-symmetric theory fully extended to the scalar Yukawa model. An additional argument is the consideration (in the spirit of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref9">9</xref>] ) a zero-dimensional version of the theory. The partition function</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1024"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in a zero-dimensional space becomes the usual improper integral</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1025"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which converges for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (non-Hermitian case) and diverges for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (Hermitian case).</p><p>In the coupling-constant perturbation theory, this model also has a very similar to the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> theory. Section 2 briefly presents the results of the coupling-constant perturbation theory and based on the perturbation theory renormalization-group analysis for this model. As well as the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> theory the Hermitian scalar Yukawa model in a six-dimensional space is asymptotically free. The non-Hermitian scalar Yukawa model in the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has, besides the Gaussian fixed point, also the non-Gaussian fixed point of Wilson-Fisher type. At <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the non-Hermitian scalar Yukawa model, as well as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> theory is ultraviolet unstable, and to describe the ultraviolet region we need to go beyond the perturbation theory.</p><p>Section 3 presents an attempt to go beyond the coupling-constant perturbation theory. The formalism of bilocal source is used to build a non-perturbative expansion of the system of the Schwinger-Dyson equations, and equation for the phion propagator in the leading approximation of this expansion is investigated. A remarkable property is established: for the Hermitian theory the phion propagator has a non-isolated singularity in the Euclidean region of momenta while for the Hermitian theory this singularity (an origin of a cut) moves in a pseudo- Euclidean region, i.e., from the point of view of the analytic properties the non-Hermitian theory is preferable.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Perturbation Theory and Renormalization Group</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Perturbation Theory</title><p>We consider the model of interaction of a complex scalar field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (phion) and a real scalar field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (chion) with the Lagrangian</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1026"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in a d-dimensional Euclidean space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> near<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. At <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the coupling g is dimensionless, and the theory contains ultraviolet divergences which can be eliminated with a standard recipe by the renormalization of fields and vacuum expectations (Green functions).</p><p>The perturbation theory on the renormalized coupling constant g gives us the following expressions for the renormalized 1PI functions:</p><p>Propagators of the phion</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1027"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and of the chion</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1028"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>A vertex:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1029"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the renormalized masses of the phion and the chion. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are counter-terms of the renormalization of the masses and fields of the phion and the chion correspondingly, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a counter-term of the renormalizarion of coupling, and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1030"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x38.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1031"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the dimensional regularization (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1032"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x41.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1033"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a ’t Hooft scale. We define the dimensionless coupling as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1034"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and by adopting the MS scheme [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref6">6</xref>] , we get the counter-terms:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1035"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Renormalization Group. Hermitian Theory</title><p>The independence of initial (bare) quantities and unrenormalized Green functions from the ’t Hooft scale <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> leads to the renormalization group equation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1036"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the one-particle-irreducible function with n phion and l chion tails.</p><p>Counter-terms (5) allow us to calculate renormalization-group coefficients<sup>1</sup></p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1037"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1038"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1039"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x53.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1040"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>These renormalization-group coefficients quite similar to corresponding coefficients of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-theory (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref6">6</xref>] ). As for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-theory the scalar Yukawa model near <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> possesses only a Gaussian fixed point<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and near this point the couplings scale according their scaling dimension.</p><p>At <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the scalar Yukawa model is asymptotically free as the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-theory. The running coupling (invariant charge) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a solution of equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1041"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the boundary condition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Here<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>For <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-function (7) the solution of this equation at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1042"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>i.e. the model possesses the typical asymptotically-free behavior at high momenta with all consequences.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Renormalization Group. Non-Hermitian Theory</title><p>For the non-hermirian PT-symmetric theory one should make the substitution</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1043"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in formulae of above Subsections. Thus, the expression for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-function takes the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1044"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>etc.</p><p>The situation in this case is also similar to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-theory (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref3">3</xref>] ). <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-function vanishes, except of the Gaussian point<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, at the fixed point of Wilson-Fisher type:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1045"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x74.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Near the Gaussian point couplings are still defined by their canonical dimensions. Near the non-Gaussian fixed point (14) the scale behavior is modified in accordance with the linearized renormalization group equations. At <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> fixed points merge into one Gauss point.</p><p>The running coupling in this case is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1046"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x76.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>i.e., the theory at large momenta has the trivial-type behavior, and the perturbation theory in this asymptotic region cannot be applicable.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Beyond the Perturbation Theory</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Shcwinger-Dyson Equations</title><p>To construct the non-perturbative approximation we will use the formalism of Schwinger-Dyson equations (SDE).</p><p>The generating functional of Green functions (vacuum averages) of the model with Lagrangian (1) is the functional integral</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1047"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the bilocal source of phions<sup>2</sup>, j is the single source of chions.</p><p>The translational invariance of the functional integration measure leads to relations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1048"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1049"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which can be rewritten as the functional-differential SDE for generating functional G:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1050"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1051"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are bare phion and chion masses. Equation (18) allows us to express all Green functions with chion legs in terms of functions that contain phions only. For logarithm <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> this equation has the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1052"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x87.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1053"><label>(Here)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The differentiation of (19) over <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> gives us the three-point chion-phion function</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1054"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x90.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1055"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x91.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is the two-particle phion function. The differentiation of (19) over j with taking into account Equation (20) gives us the chion propagator:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1056"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>etc. Thus, for a complete description of the model we need to know phion Green function only.</p><p>Excluding with the help of the SDE (18) a differentiation over j in SDE (17), we obtain at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1057"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which only contains the derivatives over the bilocal source<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then Bose-symmetry entails the relation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1058"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>reflecting crossing symmetry of the two-particle function, and, accordingly, the Equation (23) can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1059"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x98.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Both equations give the same coupling-constant perturbation series, and are completely equivalent from the point of view of some visionary exact solutions of Schwinger-Dyson equations. However, these equations give different non-perturbative expansion. This is due to the incomplete structure of the leading-order multi-particle functions of such expansions in terms of crossing symmetry. It is a peculiar feature of some non-perturbative approximations. In order to restore crossing symmetry lost in the leading-order approximation, it is necessary to consider the next-to-leading-order approximation. (A more detailed discussion of this issue see in the papers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref12">12</xref>] and references therein).</p><p>Equation (23) can be used for the construction of the mean-field expansion (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref11">11</xref>] ). In the language of Feynman diagrams the leading order of this expansion corresponds to the summation of the chains and its structure actually reproduce the renormalization-group summation of the previous section.</p><p>In this paper we consider the expansion, based on the Equation (24) (see also [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref12">12</xref>] ). In the language of Feynman diagrams the leading order of this expansion corresponds to the summation of ladder graphs, so we'll call it the ladder expansion.</p><p>For logarithm <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> this equation has the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1060"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Legendre Transform</title><p>Equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1061"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which determines the phion propagator can be regarded as an equation that determines implicitly <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as a functional of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1062"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Assuming the unique solvability of the Equation (26), we can move to a new function variable <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and define the generating functional of Legendre transform</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1063"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x106.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From definitions (26) and (27) it follows that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1064"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and SDE (25) takes the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1065"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x108.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In this equation, it is assumed that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a functional of new functional variable<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, what can be done, using the condition of connection</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1066"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x111.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which follows from the relation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1067"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x112.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Ladder Expansion</title><p>SDE (29) tells us a non-perturbative expansion of the generating functional<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which based on the following leading approximation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1068"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x114.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Next-to-the-leading-order equation is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1069"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x115.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a functional of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, defined by condition of connection (30).</p><p>At the source being switched off, Equation (31) is the equation for the leading-order phion propagator:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1070"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>A differentiation of equation (31) on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and taking into account connection condition (30) together with equation (20) gives us the equation for the three-point function:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1071"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x120.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Phion Propagator</title><p>Lets go to the Equation (33) for the phion propagator. To eliminate ultraviolet divergences in Equation (33) is sufficient to introduce counter-terms of phion-field renormalization <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and mass<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The normalization of the renormalized propagator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at zero momentum</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1072"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x124.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>leads to the renormalized equation in momentum space</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1073"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x125.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the renormalized mass operator, and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1074"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x127.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Below we consider the case of massless chion:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In this case nonlinear integral Equation (35) can be reduced to an integral Volterra-type equation, which, in turn, is reduced to a differential equation. Using the formula of massless integration in six-dimensional space</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1075"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x129.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1076"><label>(37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x130.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Introducing dimension-less function</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1077"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x131.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we obtain the integral equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1078"><label>(38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x133.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is reduced to the non-linear fourth-order differential equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1079"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x134.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This differential equation enables us to calculate the asymptotics of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for large t:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1080"><label>(40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x136.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1081"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x137.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>i.e., for Hermitian theory with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the asymptotic behavior becomes purely imaginary. In order to understand what is happening with the propagator in Euclidean region, consider a simplified model with the same UV behavior. This model is based on the following approximation of mass operator (37) in a high-momentum region:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1082"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x139.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The equation for the inverse propagator u takes the form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1083"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x140.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The cutoff at the lower limit of integration is introduced in order to avoid mass singularities (in the case insignificant).</p><p>The exact solution of Equation (42) is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66657-formula1084"><label>(43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x141.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>i.e., an asymptotic behavior at large momentum given by the same formula (40).</p><p>Thus, we can conclude that for the usual Hermitian theory with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the propagator in the ladder approximation has the non-physical non-isolated singularity in the Euclidean region, while for the non-Hermitian theory with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, this singularity moves in a pseudo-Euclidean region, i.e., the non-Hermitian theory is more preferable from the standpoint of the analytical properties of the propagator.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>Our results demonstrate that the non-Hermitian PT-symmetric scalar Yukawa model has interesting properties</p><p>both perturbative and non-perturbative. In the perturbation region of small momenta, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>theory similar in their properties to Hermitian <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> theory, i.e., energetically stable, has, in addition to the Gaussian</p><p>fixed point, a non-trivial fixed point of Wilson-Fisher type. As expected, the properties of the scalar Yukawa model in the perturbative region completely analogous to the corresponding properties of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7502721x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> theory (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66657-ref3">3</xref>] ). The non-perturbative ladder expansion of Section 3 reveals new interesting feature of the non-Hermitian model. While in the Hermitian version of theory the phion propagator has the non-physical non-isolated singularity in the Euclidean region of momenta, the non-Hermitian theory substantially free of this drawback, as the singulatity moves to the pseudo-Euclidean region.</p><p>For a complete description of the leading-order ladder expansion, including its renormalization group analysis, it is necessary to solve Equation (34) for the three-point function. This is a very difficult task, since this equation contains a nontrivial phion propagator, described by Equation (33). Perhaps for the renormalization-group analysis, clarifying the nature of the behavior of couplings in the asymptotic region is sufficient to solve a more limited problem, namely the calculation of the vertex function at zero momentum (which is, however, also very difficult). We can assume that in the Hermitian case the theory retains the property of asymptotic freedom, and everything will return to own. For the non-Hermitian PT-symmetric theory a prediction of the answer is harder. In any case, the results indicate that the non-Hermitian scalar Yukawa model has, compared with the Hermitian version, a number of attractive features, which make it a very interesting object of study.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Author is grateful to the participants of IHEP Theory Division Seminar for useful discussion.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Vladimir E. Rochev, (2016) Hermitian vs PT-Symmetric Scalar Yukawa Model. Journal of Modern Physics,07,899-907. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2016.79081</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.66657-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bender, C.M. and Boettcher, S. (1998) Physical Review Letters, 80, 5243-5246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5243</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66657-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bender, C.M. (2015) Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 631, Article ID: 012002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/631/1/012002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66657-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bender, C.M., et al. (2012) Physical Review D, 85, Article ID: 085001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.085001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66657-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bender, C.M., et al. (2013) Physical Review D, 87, Article ID: 085029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.085029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66657-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Macfarlane, A.J. and Woo, G. (1974) Nuclear Physics B, 77, 91-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(74)90306-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66657-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Collins, J.C. (1984) Renormalization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511622656</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66657-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guasch, J., et al. (2009) Effective Description of Squark Interactions. JHEP, 0904, 016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66657-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abreu, L.M., et al. (2014) Nuclear Physics B, 881, 327-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.02.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66657-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cornwall, J.M. and Morris, D.A. (1995) Physical Review D, 52, 6074-6086. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.52.6074</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66657-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dahmen, H.D. and Jona-Lasinio, G. (1967) Il Nuovo Cimento A, 52, 807-836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02738845</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66657-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rochev, V.E. (2013) Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 46, Article ID: 185401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/46/18/185401</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66657-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rochev, V.E. (2015) Elementary Particles and Fields Theory, 78, 443-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1063778815020258</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>