<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAppS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Applied Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3917</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojapps.2016.65029</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAppS-66583</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Predicting the Number of Beijing Science and Technology Personnel Based on GM(1,N) Model
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>iaocun</surname><given-names>Mao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhenping</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Information, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>maoxiaocun66@163.com(IM)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>05</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>299</fpage><lpage>309</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>23</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>16</month>	<year>May</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this paper, based on the Science and Technology Statistics in Beijing Statistical Yearbook, grey theory is used to study the relationship among S&amp;T (Science and Technology) activities personnel, R&amp;D (research and development) personnel FTE (Full Time Equivalent), intramural expenditure for R&amp;D and Patent Application Amount. According to the grey correlation coefficient, screening of grey GM(1,N) prediction variables, the grey prediction model is established. Meanwhile, time series model and GM(1,1) model are established for patent applications and R&amp;D personnel equivalent FTE. By comparing the simulating results with the real data, the absolute relative error of prediction models is less than 10%. The results of the prediction model are tested. In order to improve the prediction accuracy, the mean values of the predicted values of the two models are brought into the GM(1,N) model to predict the number of scientific and technical personnel in Beijing during 2015-2025. Forecast results show that the number of science and technology personnel in Beijing will grow with exponential growth trend in the next ten years, which has a certain reference value for predicting the science and technology activities and formulating the policy in Beijing.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Grey Relational Analysis</kwd><kwd> GM(1</kwd><kwd>N) Model</kwd><kwd> Time Series</kwd><kwd> Science and Technology</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The functions of Beijing in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei integrations region are the national political center and cultural center, international exchange center, science and technology innovation center. While science and technology innovation is the core of a country, a regional competitiveness, national strategy advocates strengthening science and technology innovation ability. Beijing, as the capital of China and international metropolis, its science and technology innovation plays a role of “leader”. Scientific and technological innovation capability is an important guarantee to optimize the allocation of scientific and technological resources, improve the efficiency of investment in science and technology, and promote the economic development of technology. Many scholars have made a lot of research on the impact of science and technology investment on economic output. Wei and Li (2005) using the econometric methods to study the impact of R&amp;D input intensity, scientific and technical personnel, the per capita possession of a number of factors on the export of high-tech products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66583-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Guo and Wang (2011) use science and technology statistics by SPSS statistical software to study the relationship between the number of scientific and technological activities and high-tech products exports [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66583-ref2">2</xref>] . Scientific and technical personnel is the fundamental factor to promote scientific and technological progress and technological innovation; science and technology personnel’s strength reflects the local science and technology strength and innovation ability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66583-ref3">3</xref>] . The patent application, scientific and technological activities and R&amp;D expenses and other variables are used to estimate the specific knowledge production function of Henan Province by Luo (2015) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66583-ref4">4</xref>] . Fu (2012) involved in scientific and technological activities of personnel in the comparison of the transformation of R&amp;D institutions and foreign R&amp;D institutions in Beijing, and pointed out that the study of scientific and technical personnel assessment should be strengthened [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66583-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>The number of patent application is the barometer of economic and social development. In this paper, based on the Science and Technology Statistics in Beijing Statistical Yearbook, grey theory is used to study the relationship among S&amp;T activities personnel, R&amp;D personnel FTE, intramural expenditure for R&amp;D and Patent Application Amount. And time series and GM(1,1) model are used to predict the number of patent applications and research and development (R&amp;D) staff equivalent to full-time equivalents for years of 2015-2025, and then GM(1,N) model is used to predict the number of municipal scientific and technological activities for the next decade.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Grey Correlation Analysis</title><p>Grey correlation analysis is a systematic and effective analysis method in the grey system theory. The quantitative description of the development trend of the system is based on the correlation between factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66583-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>The specific process of grey correlation analysis is:</p><p>1) Determine the analysis sequence</p><p>A reference sequence to determine the behavior characteristics of the system is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula2"><label>. (1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>A comparative sequence to influence the behavior characteristics of the system is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula3"><label>. (2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>2) Dimensionless variables</p><p>The sequence of the factors in the system of data may be due to the different dimension, not easy to be compared, or cannot get the correct conclusion, so in advanced dimensionless analysis of the grey correlation.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula4"><label>. (3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Resulting from the reference sequence of dimensionless sequence is as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula5"><label>. (4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>After the comparative sequence of dimensionless get sequence is as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula6"><label>. (5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>3) Grey correlation coefficient</p><p>Calculate grey correlation coefficient between reference sequence X<sub>0</sub> and compare sequence<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The calculation formula is as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula7"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is distinguishing coefficient, the smaller the coefficient, the greater the resolution. The general value is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>4) Gray correlation degree</p><p>The grey correlation degree between the reference sequence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the comparison sequence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is calculated. Because the reference sequence and comparative sequence in the curve of the various points of the degree of correlation is not a value, but too scattered, so calculating the average of the various points in the curve, as the correlation degree of reference sequence and compare sequence. The formula is as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula8"><label>. (7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the formula, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>represents the grey correlation degree between the reference sequence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the comparison sequence<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>5) Correlation degree ranking</p><p>When<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it means the comparison sequence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is much more similar than sequence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for reference sequence Y.</p><p>In the Beijing statistical yearbook, according to the statistical data from 1996 to 2014, the grey theory is used to make the gray correlation analysis of S&amp;T activities personnel, R&amp;D personnel FTE, intramural expenditure for R&amp;D and Patent Application Amount. Specific data are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>According to the data calculation results of 1996-2014 in Beijing, it is shown that the correlation of S&amp;T activities personnel, R&amp;D personnel FTE, intramural expenditure for R&amp;D with Patent Application Amount in the order:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.The order of correlation degree is R&amp;D personnel FTE, S&amp;T</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Statistical data of innovation and development indicators in Beijing during 1996-2014</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1996</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1997</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1998</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1999</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2000</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2001</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2002</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2003</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2004</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2005</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Patent application</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6595</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6313</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7723</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,842</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17,003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18,402</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22,572</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&amp;T activities personnel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >265,552</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >273,161</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >237,127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >229,584</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >261,113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240,609</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >257,326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270,921</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >301,202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >383,153</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intramural expenditure for R&amp;D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >418,614</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >532,257</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >861,138</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >938,437</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,557,011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,711,696</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,195,402</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,562,518</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3,169,064</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3,795,450</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R&amp;D personnel FTE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84,793</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84,913</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86,602</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85,740</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98,723</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95,255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114,919</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110,358</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152,132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177,765</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Patent application</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26,555</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31,680</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43,508</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50,236</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57,296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77,955</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92,305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123,336</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138,111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&amp;T activities personnel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >382,756</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >450,331</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >450,147</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >529,985</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >529,811</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >605,980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >651,003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >681,346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >726,792</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intramural expenditure for R&amp;D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4,329,878</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5,270,591</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6,200,983</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6,686,351</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8,218,234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9,366,440</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,633,640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11,850,469</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,687,953</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R&amp;D personnel FTE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168,875</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >204,668</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200,080</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >191,779</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >193,718</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >217,255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235,493</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242,175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >245,384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Intramural expenditure for R&amp;D, Unit: million.</p><p>activities personnel and intramural expenditure for R&amp;D.</p><p>According to the selection of affecting the main factor greater than 65% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66583-ref7">7</xref>] , then select R&amp;D personnel FTE and S&amp;T activities personnel which have close grey co-relationship with Patent Application Amount as indicators. First of all, time series method and GM(1,1) model are used to predict Patent Application Amount and R&amp;D personnel FTE for years of 2015-2025. Followed by GM(1,N) model predicts the number of National S&amp;T personnel in Beijing in 2015-2025.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. GM(1,1) Model</title><p>GM(1,1) model, which is basing on the past and now known or uncertain information to establish one order grey model of a variable from the past extended to future. The GM(1,1) model is used to determine the trend of the development and changes in the future. Grey prediction does not pursue the effect of individual factors, which trying to find the inherent law of the influence of the random factors on the processing of the original data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66583-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>Specific algorithm is:</p><p>1) In this paper, the original data sequence is assumed to be <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>The one-time accumulated generating sequence of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula9"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula10"><label>. (9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>2) The GM(1,1) parameters a, b of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, according to the following formula recognition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula11"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula12"><label>. (11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>3) GM(1,1) model:</p><p>The grey differential equation is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula13"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The whitening differential equation is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula14"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Time response of the whitening equation is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula15"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula16"><label>. (15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>4) GM(1,1) model accuracy (error) for the residual test.</p><p>Record <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as model value, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>as actual value, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>as the relative residual values, then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula17"><label>. (16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Beijing Patent Application Forecast</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Time Series Analysis</title><p>According to historical data, time series forecasting method was used, the prediction model of Beijing patent application amount is obtained:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula18"><label>. (17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>t = 1 for the year of 1997. The simulation value of patent application (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) can be calculated through equation (17).</p><p>The average absolute relative error of model is 6.20%, which is less than 10.00%. Thus the model can be used. And the number of patent application for 2015-2025 in Beijing (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) can be predicted by the model.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. GM(1,1) Prediction Model</title><p>Matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be obtained by calculating historical data of patent application in Beijing.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula19"><label>. (18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then the amount of patent application in Beijing Grey differential equation is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula20"><label>. (19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Whitening equation is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula21"><label>. (20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus model value of patent application for 2002-2008 in Beijing (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>) can be predicted.</p><p>The average absolute relative error of model is 7.18%, which is less than 10.00%. Thus the model can be used. And the number of patent application for 2015-2025 in Beijing (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>) can be predicted by the model.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. The Average of the Two Prediction Results</title><p>The results of two groups are averaged. Thus the predict value of the patent application in Beijing in 2015-2025</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of the simulation value and the actual value of the patent application in Beijing (unit: piece)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1997</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1998</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1999</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2000</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2001</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2002</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2003</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2004</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2005</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Patent applications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6313</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7723</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,842</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17,003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18,402</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22,572</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simulation value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5469.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6591.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7944.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9575.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11,540.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,909.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16,765.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20,206.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24,354.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Relative error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1337</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0428</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0287</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0743</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0520</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0049</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0981</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0789</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2014</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Patent applications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26,555</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31,680</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43,508</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50,236</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57,296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77,955</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92,305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123,336</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138,111</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simulation value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29,353.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35,378.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42,640.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51,392.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61,942.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74,656.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89,981.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108,451.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130,712.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Relative error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1054</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1167</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0199</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0811</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0423</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0252</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1207</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0536</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Prediction of patent application for 2015-2025 in Beijing (unit: piece)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2015</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2016</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2017</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2018</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2019</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2020</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2021</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2022</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2023</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2024</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2025</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Predicted value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157,543</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189,881</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >228,857</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275,834</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >332,453</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400,694</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >482,943</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >582,074</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >701,554</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >845,559</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,019,124</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of the simulation value and the actual value of the patent application in Beijing (unit: piece)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2002</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2003</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2004</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2005</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2006</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2007</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2008</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Actual value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,842</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17,003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18,402</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22,572</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26,555</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31,680</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43,508</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Model value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11,534.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14,138.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17,329.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21,240.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26,035.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31,911.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39,114.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Error value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1685</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0583</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0590</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0196</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0073</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1010</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2010</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Actual value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50,236</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57,296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77,955</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92,305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123,336</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138,111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57,296</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Model value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47,942.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58,763.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72,026.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88,283.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108,210.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132,634.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58,763.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Error value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0457</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0256</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0760</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0436</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0397</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0256</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Prediction of patent application for 2015-2025 in Beijing (unit: piece)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2015</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2016</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2017</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2018</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2019</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2020</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2021</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2022</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2023</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2024</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2025</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >predicted value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162,571</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >199,265</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >244,241</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299,368</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >366,938</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >449,760</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >551,274</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >675,702</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >828,214</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,015,149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,244,277</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>(<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>) is obtained by taking average of the two prediction results.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Beijing R&amp;D Personnel FTE Forecast</title><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Time Series Analysis</title><p>According to historical data, time series forecasting method was used, the prediction model of Beijing R&amp;D personnel FTE is obtained:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula22"><label>. (21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>t = 1 for the year of 1996. The simulation value of Beijing R&amp;D personnel FTE (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>) can be calculated through Equation (21).</p><p>The average absolute relative error of model is 8.23%, which is less than 10.00%. Thus the model can be used. And the number of R&amp;D personnel FTE for 2015-2025 in Beijing (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>) can be predicted by the model.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. GM(1,1) Prediction Model</title><p>Matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be obtained by calculating historical data of R&amp;D personnel FTE in Beijing.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula23"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>thus, grey differential equation is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula24"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>whitening equation is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula25"><label>. (24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus model value of R&amp;D personnel FTE in Beijing for 1998-2014 in Beijing (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>) can be predicted.</p><p>The average absolute relative error of model is 9.68%, which is less than 10.00%. Thus the model can be used. And the number of R&amp;D personnel FTE for 2015-2025 in Beijing (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0) can be predicted by the model.</p></sec><sec id="s5_3"><title>5.3. The Average of Two Prediction Results</title><p>The results of two groups are averaged. Thus the forecast value of the R&amp;D personnel FTE in Beijing in</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Prediction of patent application for 2015-2025 in Beijing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2015</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2016</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2017</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2018</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2019</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2020</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2021</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2022</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2023</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2024</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2025</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Predicted value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160,057</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >194,573</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >236,549</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >287,601</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >349,695</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >425,226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >517,108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >628,888</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >764,884</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >930,354</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,131,700</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of the simulation value and the actual value of the R&amp;D personnel FTE in Beijing (unit: one year)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1996</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1997</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1998</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1999</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2000</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2001</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2002</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2003</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2004</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2005</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84,793</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84,913</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86,602</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85,740</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98,723</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95,255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114,919</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110,358</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152,132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177,765</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simulation value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68,572</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77,632</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86,836</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96,181</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105,670</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115,302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125,077</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134,994</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145,055</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155,258</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Relative error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1913</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0857</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1218</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0704</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0884</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2232</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0465</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1266</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168,875</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >204,668</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200,080</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >191,779</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >193,718</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >217,255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235,493</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242,175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >245,384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simulation value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165,604</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176,094</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186,726</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >197,501</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208,419</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219,479</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230,683</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242,030</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >253,519</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Relative error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0194</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1396</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0298</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0759</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0204</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0332</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>FTE: full-time equivalent.</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Prediction of R&amp;D personnel FTE for 2015-2025 in Beijing city (unit: one year)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2015</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2016</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2017</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2018</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2019</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2020</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2021</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2022</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2023</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2024</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2025</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Predicted value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >265,151</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >276,927</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288,845</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300,906</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >313,110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325,457</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >337,947</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350,580</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >363,355</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >376,273</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >389,335</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of the simulation value and the actual value of the R&amp;D personnel FTE in Beijing (unit: one year)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1998</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1999</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2000</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2001</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2002</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2003</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2004</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2005</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2006</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Actual value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86,602</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85,740</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98,723</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95,255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114,919</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110,358</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152,132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177,765</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168,875</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Model value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95,941</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102,247</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108,967</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116,129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123,762</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131,896</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140,566</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149,804</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159,651</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Error value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1078</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1925</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1038</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0769</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1952</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0760</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1573</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0546</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Actual value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >204,668</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200,080</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >191,779</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >193,718</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >217,255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235,493</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242,175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >245,384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Model value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170,144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >181,327</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >193,245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >205,946</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219,482</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >233,908</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >249,282</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >265,667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Error value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1687</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0937</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0076</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0631</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0067</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0293</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0827</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Prediction of R&amp;D personnel FTE for 2015-2025 in Beijing (unit: one year)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2015</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2016</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2017</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2018</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2019</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2020</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2021</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2022</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2023</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2024</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2025</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Predicted value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283,128</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >301,737</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >321,569</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342,705</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >365,230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >389,235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >414,818</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >442,083</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >471,140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >502,106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >535,108</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>2015-2025 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1) is obtained by taking average of the two prediction results.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. GM(1,N) Model</title><p>GM(1,N) model, which is based on past and present known or uncertain information to establish a one order N variables from the past to the future, to determine the development trend of the system in the future [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66583-ref9">9</xref>] . This model is based on the assumption that there is a causal relationship between the amount of patent application and the amount of scientific and technical personnel, R&amp;D personnel FTE. According to the prediction results of the patent application and R&amp;D personnel FTE, the number of scientific and technical personnel in the future can be predicted by <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2.</p><p>1) GM(1,N) modeling, we first need to pre-test with a cover formula, which uses step ratio <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of modeling sequence and the size of subordinate interval to determine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66583-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>First, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is defined as Equation (25)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula26"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the Covering formula is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula27"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x53.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then, the selected sequence can be modeled.</p><p>2) For <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> according to Equation (27) to generate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, that can be seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>3.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula28"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula29"><label>. (28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>a) For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,according to Equation (29) for the mean of processing as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula30"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x60.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula31"><label>. (30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>b) Based on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has GM(1,N) data matrix B and data vector y<sub>N</sub>,</p><table-wrap id="table11" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Prediction of R&amp;D personnel FTE for 2015-2025 in Beijing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2015</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2016</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2017</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2018</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2019</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2020</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2021</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2022</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2023</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2024</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2025</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >274,140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >289,333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305,207</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >321,806</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >339,170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >357,346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >376,383</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >396,331</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >417,247</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >439,190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >462,221</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table12" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Historical data of innovation evaluation in Beijing (Patent Application Amount, S&amp;T activities personnel, R&amp;D personnel FTE)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1996</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1997</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1998</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1999</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2000</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2001</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2002</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2003</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2004</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2005</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Patent application (x1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6595</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6313</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7723</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,842</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17,003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18,402</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22,572</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTE (x2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84,793</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84,913</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86,602</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85,740</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98,723</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95,255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114,919</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110,358</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152,132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177,765</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&amp;T personnel (x3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >265,552</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >273,161</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >237,127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >229,584</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >261,113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240,609</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >257,326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270,921</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >301,202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >383,153</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Patent application (x1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26,555</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31,680</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43,508</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50,236</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57,296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77,955</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92,305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123,336</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138,111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FTE (x2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168,875</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >204,668</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200,080</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >191,779</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >193,718</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >217,255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235,493</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242,175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >245,384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S&amp;T personnel (x3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >382,756</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >450,331</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >450,147</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >529,985</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >529,811</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >605,980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >651,003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >681,346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >726,792</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula32"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula33"><label>. (32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>c) According to the method of least squares identification algorithm</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula34"><label>. (33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula35"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then the model is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66583-formula36"><label>. (35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Comparing the actual value with the model value, fitted values and errors of the GM(1,n) prediction model (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>4) can be obtained.</p><p>The average absolute relative error of model is 2.03%, which is less than 10.00%. Based on the forecast value of the amount of patent application and R&amp;D personnel full time equivalent, the model is used to predict the number of scientific and technological personnel in Beijing (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>5).</p><table-wrap id="table13" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>3</label><caption><title> The results of AGO for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >k</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >7</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >8</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >9</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >10</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6595</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,908</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19,229</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26,952</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37,296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49,470</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63,312</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80,315</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98,717</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121,289</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84,793</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169,706</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >256,308</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342,048</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >440,771</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >536,026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >650,945</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >761,303</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >913,435</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,091,200</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >265,552</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >538,713</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >775,840</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,005,424</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,266,537</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,507,146</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,764,472</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,035,393</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,336,595</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,719,748</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >k</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147,844</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179,524</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >223,032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >273,268</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330,564</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408,519</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500,824</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >624,160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >762,271</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,260,075</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,464,743</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,664,823</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,856,602</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,050,320</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,267,575</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,503,068</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,745,243</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,990,627</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3102,504</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3,552,835</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4,002,982</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4,532,967</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5,062,778</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5,668,758</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6,319,761</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7,001,107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7,727,899</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table14" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>4</label><caption><title> Fitted values and errors of the GM(1,n) prediction model</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1997</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1998</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1999</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2000</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2001</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2002</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2003</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2004</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2005</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Actual value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6313</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7723</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10,344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13,842</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17,003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18,402</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22,572</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fitted values</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3957</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5673</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7440</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9609</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120,185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14,326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17,454</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20,017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23,437</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residual error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3731</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0366</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0711</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0265</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0878</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0383</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2014</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Actual value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26,555</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31,680</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43,508</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50,236</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57,296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77,955</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92,305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123,336</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138,111</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fitted values</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27,935</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33,062</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39,961</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50,098</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61,478</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75,812</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93,517</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115,763</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142,936</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Residual error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0520</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0436</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0815</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0730</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0275</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0614</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0349</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>According to the time sequence and GM(1,1) prediction model, taking average value of each results of patent applications and R&amp;D personnel FTE are took into GM(1,n) model to predict Beijing 2015-2025 S&amp;T activities personnel (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>5). The prediction results were analyzed, the number of Beijing Science and technology activities is exponential growth trends such as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The results of a number of scientific and technological activities for the next ten years of Beijing prediction has certain reference value, also for the national science and technology talent investment policies provide certain basis.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusions</title><p>The prediction of the S&amp;T activities personnel is an important issue for controlling and monitoring education reforming. The training of scientific and technical personnel is a basic project of “the strategy of developing the country through science and education”, “the strategy of talent powerful nation” and “national innovation system construction”. The study on this issue is meaningful and valuable for controlling, monitoring and improving National Science and technology innovation ability. This paper aims to use prey theory to predict the condition of S&amp;T activities personnel, R&amp;D personnel FTE, intramural expenditure for R&amp;D and Patent Application Amount in recently for the last ten years.</p><p>・ GM(1,1) and GM(1,N) are introduced in this paper. In comparison, the GM(1,N) model has better predictability under the condition of scanty data than GM(1,1) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66583-ref11">11</xref>] . We need to collect relevant data of variables that involved, then according to the GM(1,N) model to predict the target variables [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66583-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>・ Data analysis showed that the number of science and technology activities in Beijing showed an exponential growth trend. According to the characteristics of the index function, the total number of people engaged in</p><table-wrap id="table15" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>5</label><caption><title> Prediction of S&amp;T activities personnel for 2015-2025 in Beijing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2015</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2016</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2017</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2018</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2019</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2020</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Predicted value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >680,208</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >725,040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >773,663</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >826,683</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >884,834</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >949,005</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Predicted value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,020,271</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,099,941</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,189,606</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,291,208</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,407,114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Prediction of S&amp;T activities personnel for 2015-2025 in Beijing</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2310577x76.png"/></fig><p>scientific research in China is growing at a faster pace. The number of scientific and technical personnel directly represents the status of scientific research in a country. Higher education is the main bearer of innovation oriented national talent cultivation and scientific research. The number and quality of scientific and technical personnel as the main body of scientific and technological innovation are the focus of all the countries in the world. Therefore, the national policy should ensure that the number of scientific and technical personnel. At the same time, China should strengthen the evaluation of the quality of scientific and technical personnel, improve the scientific and technological personnel of scientific research products, and thus enhance the country’s ability to innovate.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71540028, F012408), and Major Research Project of Beijing Wuzi University. Funding Project for Technology Key Project of Municipal Education Commission of Beijing (ID: TSJHG201310037036); Funding Project for Beijing key laboratory of intelligent logistics system (No: BZ0211); Funding Project of Construction of Innovative Teams and Teacher Career Development for Universities and Colleges Under Beijing Municipality (ID: IDHT20130517); Funding Project for Beijing philosophy and social science research base specially commissioned project planning (ID: 13JDJGD013) ; Beijing Intelligent Logistics System Collaborative Innovation Center.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Xiaocun Mao,Zhenping Li, (2016) Predicting the Number of Beijing Science and Technology Personnel Based on GM(1,N) Model. Open Journal of Applied Sciences,06,299-309. doi: 10.4236/ojapps.2016.65029</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.66583-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wei, L. and Li, L. (2005) Empirical Research on the Effect of Technological Innovation on the Exportation of High-tech Products Made in China. Journal of International Trade, 12, 32-34, 40. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66583-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, R. and Guo, Y. (2011) Empirical Study of Number of S &amp;T Activist on High-Tech Product Exports. Science &amp; Technology and Industry, No. 4, 79-82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66583-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fu, Y. (2009) Continuous Improvement of Incentive Mechanism Competitive Ability Significantly Enhanced—Analysis of the Status Quo of Science and Technology Personnel in Hangzhou City in 2008. China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House, Hangzhou. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66583-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luo, T. (2015) Bayesian Estimation of Knowledge Production Function: A Case Study of Henan. Modern Economic Information, No. 7. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66583-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fu, Z., Zhang, Y. and Li, Z. (2012) Comparison between System-transformed R&amp;D Institutions and Foreign R&amp;D Institutions in Beijing. Forum on Science and Technology in China, No. 2. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66583-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deng, J. (1985) Grey System Social Economy. National Defence Industry Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)  
http://book.kongfz.com/4953/90839244/?ref=bq</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66583-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, L. and Liu, J. (2015) Forecast of Logistics Freight Volume in Hebei Province Based on Grey GM (1,n) Model. Journal of Shijiazhuang Railway University (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION), 9, No. 2. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66583-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wei, G., Du, H. and Qi, Y. (2010) Enterprise Management Theory and Application of Innovative Research. China Supplies Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66583-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deng, J. (2002) Grey Prediction and Grey Decision-Making (Revised Edition). Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, Wuhan. (In Chinese) http://www.shangxueba.com/book/32313.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66583-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tang, J., Liao, P., Tian, B., Tang, G. and Wang, Q. (2014) Application of the Grey GM (1,n) Model to Porosity Prediction: Taking Chang 8 Reservoir in Jiyuan Area of Ordos Basin as an Example. Journal of Lanzhou University (NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION), No. 1, 39-45. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66583-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cao, K. and Xu, C. (2007) Application of GM (1, 1) and GM (1,N) Unite Model in Building Subsidence Forecast. Water Sciences and Engineering Technology, No. 6, 54-57. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66583-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dai, H. (2011) Application of GM (1,1) and GM (1,N) United Modeling Forecasting of Automatic Coagulation Dosing System of Water Works. Journal of Hubei Institute for Nationalities (NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION), No. 2, 152- 156. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>