<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2016.45011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-66556</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Use of GIS Based Maps for Preliminary Assessment of Subsoil of Guwahati City
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>inu</surname><given-names>Sharma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shaffi</surname><given-names>Kamal Rahman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Civil Engineering, Assam Engineering College, Guwahati, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>binusharma78@gmail.com(IS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>05</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>106</fpage><lpage>116</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>16</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>16</month>	<year>May</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Guwahati, the major city in the North Eastern region of India is growing rapidly in every aspect with major infrastructures like sports complex, educational institutions, hospitals, flyovers, multiplex halls, etc. Knowledge of the subsurface soil condition is necessary to ensure the structural safety and serviceability of the above mentioned structures before any construction. Therefore, contour maps of Standard penetration test N value, ground water table and shear wave velocity map using Geographical Information System (GIS) platform will be of great help to the foundation designers at the initial stage for site selection and preliminary foundation design under static and seismic condition. Contour maps of Standard penetration test N value at different depth and average contour map of N value of Guwahati city have been prepared. Standard penetration Test N values and depth of water table were taken from a data base of 200 boreholes up to 30 meter depth to prepare N value contour map of Guwahati city. A regression equation between shear wave velocity V
  <sub>s</sub> and Standard penetration test N value based on twenty seven previous similar correlations was also developed. This regression equation was used to determine shear wave velocity of Guwahati city. The average shear wave velocities for 30 m depth for all locations had been determined and used to generate map on (GIS) platform. Other subsurface geotechnical information of Guwahati city like soil classification and depth to water level from ground surface is also presented in the form of GIS based maps in order to form a data base.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Standard Penetration Test</kwd><kwd> Shear Wave Velocity</kwd><kwd> Contour Map</kwd><kwd> GIS Based Maps</kwd><kwd> Subsurface Investigation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Geotechnical subsurface information is a fundamental step towards the proper design, construction and performance of all types of geotechnical projects, ranging from foundation, earth dams, embankments, excavation, and seismic hazards. Therefore, geotechnical subsurface information like N value of the soil, soil classification and water table is prepared in the form of GIS based map and contour maps. Again for the analysis of geotechnical earthquake engineering problems like site specific amplification factor and ground response study, standard penetration test (SPT) N value and shear wave velocity are important input parameters. Borehole logging is generally considered the standard method for obtaining shear wave velocity (V<sub>s</sub>) data, but drilling and logging to the depths generally required for earthquake ground motion investigations is very expensive, and it is problematic in heavily built up areas. In view of this, several researchers have developed correlations between the SPT N value and shear wave velocity V<sub>s</sub>, which are useful for determining the dynamic soil properties. In this paper, a regression equation between V<sub>s</sub> and SPT N value based on previous similar correlations had been developed. This regression equation was used to determine shear wave velocity of Guwahati city. The shear wave velocities so determined were then compared with the shear wave velocities as determined according to the method suggested by Rao (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref1">1</xref>] . The average shear wave velocities for 30 m depth for all locations had been determined and used to generate map on Geographical Information System (GIS) platform. Using GIS, geospatial contour maps of shear wave velocity profile for Guwahati city, contour maps of standard penetration test N value and contour map of ground water table were also prepared in this study.</p><p>A soil database from 200 boreholes of Guwahati city was used for geotechnical subsurface investigation for this purpose. The soil database was from a project funded by the Department of Science and Technology, India for microzonation of Guwahati City.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Brief Review of Literature</title><p>Phukan et al. (2004) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref2">2</xref>] studied the Guwahati city areas for multi criteria evaluation in GIS environment for ground water resource mapping in Guwahati city areas. Matsuoka et al. (2005) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref3">3</xref>] studied the soil of Japan and prepared average shear-wave velocity mapping using Japan engineering geomorphologic classification map. Maheshwari et al. (2010) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref4">4</xref>] studied the soil of Chennai and developed an empirical correlation between shear wave velocity and standard penetration test N value for the soil of Chennai city. Ribeiro et al. (2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref5">5</xref>] studied the soil of Brazilian port site for geotechnical mapping and reports about N value contour mapping at Brazilian port. Humyra et al. (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref6">6</xref>] studied the soil of Rajshahi for the preparation of SPT N value contour map of Rajshahi city area. In the study they used 21 soil reports of Rajshahi city prepared by civil engineering department of Rajshahi University of engineering and Technology. Ayothiraman et al. (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref7">7</xref>] also developed average N value (15m) contour map of Guwahati city. Rao (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref1">1</xref>] studied and estimated shear wave velocity from soil indices. In the study, in situ V<sub>s</sub> measured by cross-hole technique at six sites have been compared with those evaluated using an existing empirical relation between N value, soil indices and shear wave velocities. A new, modified empirical relation for predicting V<sub>s</sub> from N values and other soil indices has been proposed. Other research workers in this direction are Imai and Yoshimura (1970) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref8">8</xref>] , Sykora and Stokoe (1983) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref9">9</xref>] , Jafari et al. (2002) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref10">10</xref>] and Ismet, K. A. et al. (2006) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Study Area</title><p>The Guwahati city area lying between latitude 26.1833˚N and longitude 91.733˚E measures about 229.94 sq. km, encompassing southern part of Kamrup (Urban) district of Assam. The mighty river Brahmaputra flows to the north of Guwahati city, the south and the eastern sides are surrounded by two rows of semi-circular hillocks. The city is extended more in an E-W trend occupying the position between the Brahmaputra River towards north and Precambrian hills of Shillong Plateau towards south.</p>Geomorphologic and Geologic Setting<p>It has a population of over 814,575 (Census 2001) occupying mostly the narrow tracts of alluvium and sediment filled low lands interspersed with Precambrian residual hills. Intensified anthropogenic activities particularly in and around the hills has led to high rate of aggradations in the low lying areas clogging the city drainage system. Alluvial soil is found in the valleys and low lying areas of the city. They are typically brown and grey coloured silty clays or clayey silts. At present most of the ancient alluvial soils are overlain by artificially transported soil and overburden material brought about by anthropogenic activities. They are visible only in excavations and borings. The hills surrounding Guwahati city are primarily composed of Porphyritic Granites and Quartzo Feldspathic Gneiss which are cross-cut by amphibolite intrusives and quartz veins. Sandy soils which are produced by weathering of porphyritic granites are found in many areas of the city. The sandy soils are rich in unsorted coarse fragments of quartz together with associated clay and minor amounts of mica flakes. These soils are pale brown in colour and have a low degree of cohesion. Localities underlain by Quartzo-feldspathic Gneisses are covered by red coloured soils rich in clay minerals.</p><p>In order to study the engineering soil properties of Guwahati City soil, bore holes of 30m depth were made in 200 locations covering an area of 262 sqkm. The bore hole location map along with the river Brahmaputra in Guwahati city is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>From the bore holes it is seen soils in Guwahati city mostly consists of alternating layers of both fined grained and coarse grained soils. There is a great deal of variation in the thickness of these layers. The fine grained fraction mostly consists of soils of classification CL, CI and CH according to the Indian standard soil classification. In a few locations inorganic silt of classification ML and CL-ML and non plastic inorganic silts were also encountered. The coarse grained fraction is mostly of classification SP, SW, SC, SM, SP-SC. Gravel deposits were also encountered in certain bore holes. The soil classification map at a depth of 6m is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. The soil classification map can be used for seismic site effect evaluation.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. N-Value Contour Maps</title><p>Standard penetration test was done at every 1.5 m interval up to 30 m depth to determine the N value of the soil in the 200 bore holes. At some locations, SPT has been done to depths less than 30 m due to refusal been encountered. Uncorrected N value of the soils varied from 4 to &gt; 50 (refusal). The data available from SPT were corrected for overburden pressure and dilatancy for the development of SPT N value contour maps. The N value contour maps for 3 m, 6 m and 10.5 m from the ground surface are shown in Figures 3-5 respectively.</p><p>The average standard penetration resistance at all the bore holes can be computed by the following expression as suggested by International Building Code [IBC, 2003] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Locations of bore holes in Guwahati city</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-2170180x6.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Soil classification map at a depth of 6m in Guwahati city</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-2170180x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Contour map of corrected N value at 3 m depth</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-2170180x8.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Contour map of corrected N value at 6 m depth</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-2170180x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Contour map of corrected N-value at 10.5 m depth</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-2170180x10.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.66556-formula55"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-2170180x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where d<sub>i</sub> = thickness of each layer.</p><p>N<sub>i</sub> = SPT N value at i<sup>th</sup> layer.</p><p>n = total no layers.</p><p>The spatial distribution of average N value up to 30 m depth is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</p><p>Many building codes use N<sub>ave</sub> for classifying a site for purposes of incorporating local site conditions in estimation of design ground motion. In IBC (2000) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref13">13</xref>] the site classification based on average N value is given and is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. As per IBC (2000), E-type sites with low N<sub>ave</sub> are susceptible to liquefaction.</p><p>According to the above classification out of 200 bore holes of Guwahati city 89 boreholes are classified as E type and rest of 111 boreholes belong to class D.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Map of Water Table</title><p>The contour map of depth to ground water level in Guwahati city is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>. The map in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> in-</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Spatial distribution of average N value up to 30 m</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-2170180x12.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Soil site classification based on N<sub>avg</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Range of N<sub>avg</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Site class</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N<sub>avg</sub> &lt; 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 &lt; N<sub>avg</sub> &lt; 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >D</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N<sub>avg</sub> &gt; 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Contour map of depth to ground water table in Guwahati city</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-2170180x13.png"/></fig><p>dicates that in most of the locations in Guwahati city the water table is at a shallow depth. Depth to the water table in the 200 bore logs was found to be within 0m to 6m meter of the ground surface.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Shear Wave Velocity Based on N Value</title><p>Shear wave velocity can be measured either by invasive or non-invasive methods. Invasive methods mainly include down hole, up hole and cross hole method. Non-invasive method includes seismic refraction, Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) and Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW). However, both these methods are very expensive and require expert supervision. Many empirical relations now exists connecting V<sub>s</sub> and soil indices. Most of these equations are based on the relation between V<sub>s</sub> and N value. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows 27 such empirical correlations as reported in Marto, A. et al. (2013) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref14">14</xref>] . These empirical relations are used mainly for convenience, efficiency and cost saving.</p><p>By using the above 26 correlations, simple linear power regression analysis was done by averaging shear wave velocities at different N values. The resulting equation from above analysis is given as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66556-formula56"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-2170180x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for which R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9996</p><p>Rao (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref1">1</xref>] has given a relation between shear wave velocity and N value in the form.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66556-formula57"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-2170180x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, H = thickness of soil strata.</p><p>The coefficient for soil type according to Rao is given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Correlations of SPT N-value and shear wave velocity</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Researcher</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kanai (1966)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 19N<sup>0.6</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ohba and Toriumi (1970)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 84N<sup>0.31</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Imai and Yahimura (1970)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 76N<sup>0.33</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fujimara (1972)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 92.1N<sup>0.337</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ohsaki and Iwasaki (1973)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 81.4N<sup>0.39</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Imai and Yoshimura (1975)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 92N<sup>0.329</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Imai et al. (1975)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 89.9N<sup>0.341</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Imai (1977)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 91N<sup>0.337</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ohta and Goto (1978)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 85.35N<sup>0.348</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seed and Idriss (1981)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 61.4N<sup>0.5</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Imai and Tonouchi (1982)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 97N<sup>0.314</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Imai and Yoshimura (1990)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 76N<sup>0.33</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yokota et al. (1991)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 121N<sup>0.27</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kalteziotis et al. (1992)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 76.2N<sup>0.24</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Athanasopoulos (1995)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 107.6N<sup>0.36</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sisman (1995)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 32.8N<sup>0.51</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iyisan (1996)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 51.5N<sup>0.516</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jafari et al. (1997)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 22N<sup>0.85</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kiku et al. (2001)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 68.3N<sup>0.292</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hasancebi and Ulusay (2007)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 90N<sup>0.309</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hanumantharao and Ramana (2008)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 82.6N<sup>0.43</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lee and Tsai (2008)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 137.153N<sup>0.229</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dikmen (2009)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 58N<sup>0.39</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uma Maheswari et al. (2010)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 95.64N<sup>0.301</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tsiambaos and Sabatakakis (2011)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 105.7N<sup>0.327</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anbazhagan et al. (2012)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> = 68.96N<sup>0.51</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Coefficient of soil type</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type of soil</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Coefficient for soil type</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clay</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fine sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.086</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medium sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.066</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coarse sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.135</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sand and gravel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.153</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gravel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.448</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In this study, shear wave velocity is determined from Equation (2) and Equation (3) from the uncorrected N values obtained from the 200 bore holes. Shear wave velocity is also computed from the uncorrected N values using Equation (3) because this equation incorporates thickness of the soil strata and also type of soil. Most of the researchers utilized uncorrected SPT N value in establishing relationship with shear wave velocity values. Maheswari et al. (2010) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref4">4</xref>] reported that the corrected and uncorrected N values predicted V<sub>s</sub> with equal accuracy. Mhaske and Choudhury (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref15">15</xref>] also concluded that correlation of uncorrected SPT N value and shear wave velocity V<sub>s</sub> can give reasonably good estimate of value of shear wave velocity for typical soil of Mumbai city. In view of this, shear wave velocity is determined from the uncorrected N values.</p><p>The shear wave velocity averaged over the top 30 m of soil is referred to as V<sub>S30</sub> and is computed by dividing 30 m with the shear wave velocity from the surface to 30 m as given in following equation.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66556-formula58"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-2170180x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where ∑d<sub>i</sub> = cumulative depth in m.</p><p>V<sub>i</sub> = Shear wave velocity at i<sup>th</sup> layer.</p><p>Modern seismic codes like NEHRP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref16">16</xref>] , IBC2000 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref13">13</xref>] and Eurocode 8 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref17">17</xref>] use V<sub>S30</sub> for doing the site characterization. GIS based map of V<sub>S30</sub> by Equation (2) is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> and map by Equation (3) of Rao (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref1">1</xref>] is shown <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>.</p><p>According to NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Programme) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref16">16</xref>] site classes of soil profile based on V<sub>S30</sub> are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Mapping of average shear wave velocity (V<sub>S30</sub>) of Guwahati city (map developed by Equation (2))</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-2170180x17.png"/></fig><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Mapping of average shear wave velocity (V<sub>S30</sub>) for Guwahati city (map developed by Equation (3))</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-2170180x18.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Site classification of soil based on V<sub>S30</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Site class</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>S</sub><sub>30</sub> (m/s) range</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Soil profile name</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;1500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hard rock</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >760 - 1500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rock</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >360 - 760</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very dense soil &amp; soft rock</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180 - 360</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stiff soil</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;180.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soft soil</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>It is seen that the Shear wave velocities according to Rao (2012 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref1">1</xref>] is found to be higher than that obtained by Equation (2) with the percentage variation between the two methods varying from 38% to 61%. This high percentage variation is because Equation (2) is a correlation between V<sub>s</sub> and N value obtained from various correlations throughout the world which are site specific whereas Equation (3) incorporates the thickness of the soil strata and soil indices which are not incorporated in Equation (2).</p><p>When average shear wave velocities of Guwahati city are calculated by Equation (2), then out of 200 boreholes in Guwahati city 6 sites belongs to class E and 194 borehole sites comes under class D. According to Rao (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref1">1</xref>] , out of 200 boreholes 11 site belongs to class D, 183 sites belongs to class C and 6 site comes under class B. On going through the bore logs of the 200 bore holes it is seen that Guwahati soil consists of alternating layers of both fined grained and coarsed grained soils with N-value ranging from 4 to &gt;50 (refusal). Ninety seven number of bore holes showed existence of very dense sand strata from depth ranging from 12 m to 22.5 m up to 30 m showing N-value as refusal. Again seven number of bore holes have gravel deposits from depth ranging from 17 m to 22 m up to 30 m. Bed rock was not encountered in any of the 200 borings in Guwahati city. This gives the impression that Equation (3) according to Rao (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref1">1</xref>] is overestimating the shear wave velocity and Equation (2) is underestimating the shear wave velocity of Guwahati city.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusion</title><p>This paper presents subsurface geotechnical information of Guwahati city in the form of GIS based maps and contour maps in order to provide the database for preliminary assessment of subsoil of Guwahati city. For this purpose, GIS based map of average shear wave velocity V<sub>S30</sub> and contour maps of N- value, average N-value, depths to ground water table were generated to characterize subsurface conditions in Guwahati city. Though these, GIS based maps have many inherent shortcomings yet these maps will be of use to the foundation designers at the initial stage for site selection and preliminary foundation design under static and seismic condition. Further, it can be used for low cost housing construction where generally subsurface investigations are not done. Shear wave velocities determined according to Rao (2012) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66556-ref1">1</xref>] are found to be higher than that obtained by using the regression equation developed in this paper with the percentage variation between the two methods varying from 38% to 61%. This indicates that further study is needed in this direction.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Binu Sharma,Shaffi Kamal Rahman, (2016) Use of GIS Based Maps for Preliminary Assessment of Subsoil of Guwahati City. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection,04,106-116. doi: 10.4236/gep.2016.45011</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.66556-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rao</surname><given-names> S.Ch. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>Estimation of Shear Wave Velocity from Soil Indices</article-title><source> Indian Geotechnical Journal</source><volume> 42</volume>,<fpage> 267</fpage>-<lpage>273</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Phukon, P., Phukan, S., Das, P. and Sarma, B. (2004) Multicriteria Evaluation in GIS Environment for Groundwater Resource Mapping in Guwahati City Areas, Assam. Map India Conference, Delhi, 28-30 January 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matsuoka, M., Wakamatsu, K., Fujimoto, K. and Midorikawa, S. (2005) Average Shear-Wave Velocity Mapping Using Japan Engineering Geomorphologic Classification Map. Structural Engineering/Earthquake Engineering, JSCE, 23, 57s-68s.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maheswari, U.R., Boominathan, A. and Dodagoudar, G.R. (2010) Use of Surface Waves in Statistical Correlations of Shear Wave Velocity and Penetration Resistance of Chennai Soils. Geotechnical and Geology Engineering, 28, 119-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9285-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riberio, E.P., Dyminski, A.S. and Kormann, M. (2007) Evaluation of Local and Global Interpolation Using Neural Networks for Geotechnical Mapping of Brazilian Port Site. CMNE/CILAMCE 2007, Porto, 13-15 Junho 2007, 1-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Humyra, T., Awall, Md.R., Mofiz, S.A. and Sobhan, Md.A. (2012) Preparation of SPT Contour Map of Rajshahi City Area and Its Application to Foundation Design. International Journal of Civil &amp; Environmental Engineering, 12, 11-17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayothiraman, R., Raghukanth, S.T.G. and Sreelatha, S. (2012) Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential of Guwahati: Gateway City to Northeastern India. Natural Hazards, 63, 449-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0158-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Imai, T. and Yoshimura, Y. (1970) Elastic Wave Velocity and Soil Properties in Soft Soil (in Japanese). Tsuchi-ToKiso, 18, 17-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sykora, D.E. and Stokoe, K.H. (1983) Correlations of In-Situ Measurements in Sands of Shear Wave Velocity. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 20, 125-136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jafari, M.K., Shafiee, A. and Razmkhah, A. (2002) Dynamic Properties of Fine Grained Soils in South of Tehran. Journal of Seismological Earthquake Engineering, 4, 25-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ismet, K.A., Tildy, P., Pronay, Z., Pinar, A. and Hermann, L. (2006) VS30 Mapping and Soil Classification for Seismic Site Effect Evaluation in Dinar Region, SW Turkey. Geophysical Journal International, 165, 223-235.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IBC (2003) The International Building Code. International Code Council, Inc., USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IBC (2000) The International Building Code. International Code Council, Inc., USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marto, A., Soon, T.C. and Kasim, F. (2013) A Correlation of Shear Wave Velocity and Standard Penetration Resistance. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 18, 463-471.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mahaske, S.Y. and Choudhury, D. (2011) Geospatial Contour Mapping of Shear Wave Velocity for Mumbai City. Natural Hazards, 59, 317-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9758-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) (2009) Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures. FEMA P-750, Building Seismic Safety Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66556-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eurocode 8 (1998) Geotechnical Design. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports, European Commission, Ispra.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>