<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CSTA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Crystal Structure Theory and Applications</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2169-2491</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/csta.2016.52002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">CSTA-66239</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Estimation of Nucleation Thermodynamical Parameters of La&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;Sr&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;xCuO&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; (LSCO) and YBa&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;Cu&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;7–&amp;delta;&lt;/sub&gt; (YBCO) Crystallizing from High Temperature Solution
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>hahida</surname><given-names>Akhter</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Deba</surname><given-names>Prasad Paul</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Physics, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>05</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>23</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>2</month>	<year>May</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The growth kinetics of LSCO and YBCO single crystals from high temperature solution of LSCO-CuO solute-solvent and YBCO-CuO solute-solvent systems has been investigated. Based on regular solution model and classical nucleation theory, the thermodynamical data investigated for the systems are used to determine the nucleation parameters: interfacial free energy, metastable zone-width, volume free energy, critical energy barrier for nucleation and radius of critical nucleus for LSCO and YBCO which leads to the understanding of the nucleation phenomena of LSCO and YBCO.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>LSCO</kwd><kwd> YBCO</kwd><kwd> Interfacial Energy</kwd><kwd> Metastable Zone-Width</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The important renewable method of growing single crystals of La<sub>2</sub>Sr<sub>2</sub>CuO<sub>4</sub> (LSCO) and YBa<sub>2</sub>Cu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7−δ</sub> (YBCO) is the high temperature solution using LSCO-CuO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref3">3</xref>] and BaO-CuO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref4">4</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref6">6</xref>] as flux respectively. A satisfactory flux should have high solubility for the solvent and an appreciable change of solubility with temperature. The widely used flux is the LSCO-CuO mixed in the ratio 0.23:0.77 for LSCO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref7">7</xref>] and BaO-CuO mixed in the ratio 0.28:0.72 for YBCO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref8">8</xref>] . The binary phase diagram of the solute-solvent system is very essential to grow LSCO and YBCO crystals from flux technique. The high temperature solution growth techniques require the knowledge of the essential nucleation thermodynamical parameters like interfacial energy, metastable zone- width, volume free energy, critical energy barrier for nucleation and radius of crystal nucleus for the growth of good quality bulk single crystals. Up to now, there have been no reports in the literature regarding these key parameters. Here an attempt has been made to estimate these parameters theoretically to understand the role of these nucleation parameters for the crystallization of LSCO from LSCO-CuO flux and YBCO from BaO-CuO flux. According to the assumption of regular solution model, the nucleation process is considered to be homogeneous in nature and in the nucleation process solid and liquid phases coexist together. In this paper the regular solution model has been adopted to calculate the nucleation parameters of LSCO and YBCO for the first time.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Nucleation Thermodynamical Parameters</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Interfacial Energy</title><p>The interfacial energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the interface between the growing crystal and the surrounding mother phase in important role in the nucleation of crystals. It is well known that for all crystal-solution interfaces, it is difficult to predict theoretically the interfacial energy with sufficient accuracy. Also, it is more difficult to determine <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by direct unambiguous experiments from high temperature solution growth. Nielson and Sohnel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref9">9</xref>] reported the relationship between interfacial energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and solubility for the nucleation of electrolyte crystals in aqueous solution. Later, nucleation experiments have been employed to determine <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> from supersaturated solutions and the relationship between interfacial energy and solubility have been given for low temperature solution growth system by many researchers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref12">12</xref>] . Quit recently, many workers have reported theoretical derivations of more refined expressions for the linear dependence between interfacial energy and solubility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref13">13</xref>] . The interfacial energy can be determined experimentally from data on nucleation and growth kinetics, and from contact angle measurements. Consequently, estimation of interfacial energy from physico-chemical data has drawn considerable attention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref14">14</xref>] . Bennema and Sohnel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref15">15</xref>] based on the regular solution theory have derived an expression for the relationship between the interfacial energy and solubility as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66239-formula37"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the mole function of solute; T is the temperature in Kelvin; d is the inter ionic distance or ionic diameter and k is a Boltzmann constant. In the present work this expression is used to calculate the interfacial energy of LSCO crystal from the solubility data of the LSCO-CuO binary phase diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) and of YBCO crystal of BaO-CuO quasi-binary phase diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Metastable Zone-Width</title><p>Crystallization involves two distinct steps: nucleation, which is the birth of a nucleus and crystal growth which</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Binary phase diagram of LSCO-CuO</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x13.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Quasi-binary phase diagram of YBCO-BaO/CuO</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x14.png"/></fig><p>involves the growth of the existing nucleus. In order to thermodynamically in a non-equilibrium state and is known as metastable state. This state comes to a thermodynamically stable state with small perturbation, which causes the formation of nuclei of a new phase. The formation of such nuclei is limited due to energy barrier are greater than or equal to a critical size. Initial stage of crystallization in supersaturated solution is the formation of nuclei of crystalline phase. Classical homogeneous theories were developed by high and Pound [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref16">16</xref>] , Nielson [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref17">17</xref>] and Zettlemoyer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref18">18</xref>] describing nucleation as a relaxation process from a metastable state. The relative super saturation S of a solution at a temperature T is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66239-formula38"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the heat of solution; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the super cooling and R is the gas constant.</p><p>The relation between the solubility and the enthalpy of a real solution is given as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66239-formula39"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the excess entropy of mixing.</p><p>From the above equation it is apparent that a plot of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> versus 1/T gives a straight line, the slope of which equal to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is calculated from the data of LSCO solute in LSCO-CuO solvent solubility curve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) and YBCO solute in BaO-CuO (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Volume Free Energy</title><p>Fluctuations within the supersaturated solution cause the formation of small clusters of molecules, known as embryos. The driving force for the nucleation from the supersaturated solution is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66239-formula40"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the volume free energy change per unit volume; v is the specific volume of the solute molecule and k is the Boltzmann constant.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Critical Energy Barrier</title><p>The radius of critical nucleus, and critical energy barrier associated with the critical nucleation for spherical nucleus are related as</p><p><img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x25.png" />,<img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x26.png" /> (5)</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>The interfacial energy, metastable zone-width (supercooling temperature), volume free-energy, critical energy barrier and radius of critical nucleus of LSCO and YBCO has been calculated using the different formalism as discussed above and presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>The variation of interfacial energy with temperature is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> for LSCO. From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, it can be observed that the interfacial energy increases, with the decrease of temperature of the solution and the trend exhibited with the experimental observation of high temperature solution growth of KTP crystals crystallizing from K<sub>6</sub>P<sub>4</sub>O<sub>13</sub> flux [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref19">19</xref>] and in the NdBa<sub>2</sub>Cu<sub>3</sub>O<sub>7−</sub><sub>d</sub> (Nd123) system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref20">20</xref>] , the strong anistropy in the interfacial energy may be due to the inherent property of LSCO in LSCO-CuO solute- solvent system. The variation of interfacial energy with temperature exhibits similar trend in case of YBCO in BaO-CuO solute-solvent system as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> which is also similar the experimental observation of high temperature solution growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>The calculated value of metastable zone-width for LSCO at different temperatures is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and for YBCO at different temperature is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> for LSCO and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> for YBCO, it can be concluded that the metastable zone-width is narrow at higher temperature and wide at lower temperature of the solute in the solution. This is very much conformable with the expected prediction. The degree of probability of nucleation depends on the intermolecular distances of the solute particles in the solution and therefore on its concentration. In the literature there is no specific value of metastable zone-width and crystallization tem-</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Nucleation Thermodynamical parameters of LSCO</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Temp. T (K)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mole-fraction (x<sub>m</sub>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Interfacial energy s (mJ/m<sup>2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Metastable zone-width DT<sub>C</sub> (K)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Volume free-energy DG<sub>v</sub> &#180; 10<sup>6</sup> (J/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Critical energy DG<sup>*</sup> &#180; 10<sup>−16</sup> (mJ/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Radius of critical nucleus r<sup>*</sup> (nm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1530</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.395</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1510</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.383</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1490</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.368</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1470</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.349</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1450</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.327</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1430</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1410</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.276</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−9.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1390</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.249</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−9.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.221</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.193</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.76</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Nucleation Thermodynamical parameters of YBCO</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Temp. T (K)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mole-fraction (x<sub>m</sub>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Interfacial energy s (mJ/m<sup>2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Metastable zone-width DT<sub>C</sub> (K)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Volume free-energy DG<sub>v</sub> &#180; 10<sup>6</sup> (J/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Critical energy DG<sup>*</sup> &#180; 10<sup>−16 </sup> (mJ/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Radius of critical nucleus r<sup>*</sup> (nm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1254.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19737</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−21.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1241.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15368</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−24.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1223.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11579</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−28.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1198.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08158</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−33.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1173.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04737</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−41.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1123.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01579</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−57.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.07</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of interfacial energy of LSCO with temperature</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x27.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of metastable zone-width of YBCO with temperature</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x28.png"/></fig><p>perature. Different laboratories reported different values of metastable zone-width and crystallizing temperature ranging from 1550 - 1350 K [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref23">23</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref25">25</xref>] which is comparable to theoretically calculated values.</p><p>The calculated value of metastable zone-width for LSCO at different mole-fraction is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, it is concluded that metastable zone-width is wide at low concentrations i.e. at low temperature, and narrow at high concentration i.e. at higher temperature of the solute in the solution. The variation of interfacial energy with mole fraction is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> for LSCO and YBCO. It is observed that the interfacial energy increases with the decrease of mole fraction of the solution, which may be due to the inherent property of the flux and trend exhibited in the graph is similar to the experimental observation of high temperature solution growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66239-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>The change in free energy on the formation of a single YBCO molecule at equilibrium has been calculated using the available thermodynamical data. Using the regular solution model the thermodynamical potential of the components associated with the reaction has been calculated. The critical energy, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>has been evaluated by calculating the excess free energy. The critical energy of YBCO with temperature is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and for LSCO in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. It is noticed that critical energy decrease with increasing temperature which associated with the interface in terms of the energy of interactions between the molecules.</p><p>For the better understanding of the growth kinetics of LSCO and YBCO crystals, the other nucleation thermodynamical parameters of LSCO and YBCO such as volume free-energy, critical energy, radius of critical energy, energy of formation in the nucleus are calculated for various values of interfacial tension is given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The present work provides a comprehensive picture of LSCO crystal from crystallizing LSCO-CuO flux and YBCO crystal from crystallizing BaO-CuO flux. The uncertainty in determining the above nucleation parameters of LSCO and YBCO crystals from high temperature solution growth by experimental method creates interest in determining the above parameters.</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of metastable zone-width of LSCO mole fraction (x<sub>m</sub>)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x30.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of critical energy of YBCO with with temperature</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2540088x31.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The nucleation parameters of LSCO crystal growth from the LSCO-CuO flux and YBCO from BaO-CuO flux at different crystallization temperatures have been calculated. As there are no reports in the literature for the nucleation thermodynamical perameters of LSCO and YBCO crystals, the present theoretically estimated values will be useful for the growth of large size good quality single crystals of LSCO and YBCO.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Shahida Akhter,Deba Prasad Paul, (2016) Estimation of Nucleation Thermodynamical Parameters of La<sub>2</sub>Sr<sub>2</sub>xCuO<sub>4</sub> (LSCO) and YBa<sub>2</sub>Cu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7–&amp;delta;</sub> (YBCO) Crystallizing from High Temperature Solution. Crystal Structure Theory and Applications,05,17-23. doi: 10.4236/csta.2016.52002</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.66239-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Inoue, T., Hayashi, S., Komatsu, H. and Shimuzu, M. (1987) Growth of (La1–xSrx)2CuO4–δ Crystals from High Temperature Solution. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 26, L732. http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.26.L732</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hidaka, Y., Enomoto, Y., Suzuki, M., Oda, M. and Murakaru, T. (1987) Anisotropie Properties of Superconducting Single-Crystal (La1–xSrx)2CuO4. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 26, L377.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.26.L377</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, C., Watts, B.E., Wanklyn, B.M. and Thomas, P. (1988) The Flux Growth of Crystals of (La,Sr)2CuO4 and (La,Sr)CuO3. Solid State Communications, 66, 611-612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(88)90218-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hidaka, Y., Enomoto, Y., Suzuki, M., Oda, M. and Murakaru, T. (1987) Single Crystal Growth of Lanthanum Alkaline Earth Copper Oxide ((La1–xAx)2CuO4 (A = Barium or Strontium)) and Barium Yttrium Copper Oxide (Ba2YCu3O7–y). Journal of Crystal Growth, 85, 581-584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(87)90025-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hayashi, S., Ohno, T., Inoue, T. and Komatsu, H. (1988) Growth of ErBa2Cu3O7–δ Single Crystals from High Temperature Solution. Journal of Crystal Growth, 91, 331-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(88)90246-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Assmus, W. and Schmidbauer, W. (1993) Crystal Growth of HTSC Materials. Superconductor Science and Technology, 6, 555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/6/8/001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, C. (1992) Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization. Vol. 24, 244.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dembinski, K., Gervais, M., Odier, P. and Coutures, J.P. (1990) A Non-Polluting Single Crystal Growth Process for YBaCuO and Phase Diagram Studies. Less-Common Metals, 164-165, 177-186.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-5088(90)90212-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nielson, A.E. and Sohnel, O. (1971) Interfacial Tensions Electrolyte Crystal-Aqueous Solution from Nucleation Data. Journal of Crystal Growth, 11, 233-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(71)90090-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bennema, P. and Gilmer, G.H. (1993) An Introduction in Crystal Growth. Hartman, P. Ed. (North Holland, Amsterdam, p. 263.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sangwal, K. (1989) On the Estimation of Surface Entropy Factor, Interfacial Tension, Dissolution Enthalpy and Metastable Zone-Width for Substances Crystallizing from Solution. Journal of Crystal Growth, 97, 393-405. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(89)90221-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sohnel, O. (1982) Electrolyte Crystal-Aqueous Solution Interfacial Tensions from Crystallization Data. Journal of Crystal Growth, 57, 101-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(82)90254-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mernsmann, A. (1990) Calculation of Interfacial Tensions. Journal of Crystal Growth, 102, 841-847. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(90)90850-K</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bennema, P. and Vander Erden, J.P. (1987) Morphology of Crystals. Chap. I, In: Sanagawa, I., Ed., Tokyo, 1-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bennema, P. and Sohnel, O. (1990) Interfacial Surface Tension for Crystallization and Precipitation from Aqueous Solutions. Journal of Crystal Growth, 102, 547-556. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(90)90412-E</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirth, J.P. and Pound, G.M. (1963) Condensation and Evaporation, Nucleation and Growth Kinetics. Pergamon Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nielson, A.E. (1964) Kinetics and Precipitation. Pergamon Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zettlemoyer, A.C. (1969) Nucleation. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaweit, M. (1961) über die Kinetik der Phasenbildung in kondensierten Systemen. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, 28, 245-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/zpch.1961.28.3_4.245</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paul, D.P., Jayavel, R. and Subramanian, C. (1999) Investigations on Nucleation Thermodynamical Parameters of NdBa2Cu3O7–δ (Nd123) Crystallizing from High Temperature Solution. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 59, 175-178. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(99)00040-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joseph Kumur, F., Ganesa Moorthy, S., Jayaraman, D. and Subramanian, C.J. (1996) Estimation of Metastable Zone Width, Interfacial Energy and Growth Rates of KTiOPO4 Crystallizing from K6P4O13 Flux by Hot Stage Microscopy. Journal of Crystal Growth, 160, 129-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(95)00443-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shahida, A. and Deba, P.P. (2004) Estimation of Nucleation Thermodynamical Parameters of La2Sr2CuO4 (LSCO) Crystallizing from High Temperature Solution. Journal of Materials Chemistry and Physics, 88, 41-45. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.05.047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oka, K., Saito, M., Ito, M., Nakane, K., Murata, K., Nshihara, Y. and Unoki, H. (1989) Phase Diagram and Crystal Growth of NdBa2Cu3O7–y. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 28, L219-L221. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.28.L219</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, J., Thirumavalavan, M., Ramasamy, P., Gnanam, F.D. and Ramasamy, P. (1986) Thermodynamics and Nucleation Behaviour in the System Y2O3-Al2O3-Y3Al5O12. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 19, 1223-1232. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/19/7/012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66239-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O’Bryan, H.M. and Connor Jr., P.B. (1996) Growth of Rare-Earth Aluminum Garnets by Floating Zone Technique. American Ceramic Society Bulletin, 45, 578-581.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>