<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2016.78073</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-66195</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Non-Perturbative Analysis of Various Mass Generation by Gluonic Dressing Effect with the Schwinger-Dyson Formalism in QCD
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>hotaro</surname><given-names>Imai</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hideo</surname><given-names>Suganuma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Institute for the Advancement of Higher Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>suganuma@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp(HS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>04</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>790</fpage><lpage>805</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>15</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>26</month>	<year>April</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  As a topic of “quantum color dynamics”, we study various mass generation of colored particles and gluonic dressing effect in a non-perturbative manner, using the Schwinger-Dyson (SD) formalism in (scalar) QCD. First, we review dynamical quark-mass generation in QCD in the SD approach as a typical fermion-mass generation via spontaneous chiral-symmetry breaking. Second, using the SD formalism for scalar QCD, we investigate the scalar diquark, a bound-state-like object of two quarks, and its mass generation, which is clearly non-chiral-origin. Here, the scalar diquark is treated as an extended colored scalar field, like a meson in effective hadron models, and its effective size R is introduced as a form factor. As a diagrammatical difference, the SD equation for the scalar diquark has an additional 4-point interaction term, in comparison with the single quark case. The diquark size R is taken to be smaller than a hadron, 
  R ~ 1 fm, and larger than a constituent quark, 
  R ~ 0.3 fm. We find that the compact diquark with 
  R ~ 0.3 fm has a large effective mass of about 900 MeV, and therefore such a compact diquark is not acceptable in effective models for hadrons. We also consider the artificial removal of 3- and 4-point interaction, respectively, to see the role of each term, and find that the 4-point interaction plays the dominant role of the diquark self-energy. From the above two different cases, quarks and diquarks, we guess that the mass generation of colored particles is a general result of non-perturbative gluonic dressing effect.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Dynamical Mass Generation</kwd><kwd> Diquarks</kwd><kwd> Schwinger-Dyson Formalism</kwd><kwd> QCD</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) is the fundamental gauge theory of the strong interaction, and it is a long important problem to describe hadron structure and properties based on QCD. Quarks and gluons, the basic ingredients of QCD, strongly interact with each other in an infrared region, and they are confined in hadrons. Then, due to their non-perturbative properties, it is fairly difficult to describe hadrons directly from QCD. Also, the non-perturbative dynamics in QCD directly relates to the other important physical subject of “mass generation.”</p><p>The origin of mass is one of the most fundamental issues in physics. One famous category of mass generation is the Yukawa interaction with the Higgs field. However, even besides the dark sector, the Higgs-origin mass is only about 1% of the total mass in our universe, where dominant massive particles are nuclei (u,d quarks) and electrons. Actually, the Higgs interaction only gives the electron mass (about 0.5MeV) and a small current quark mass (a few MeV) for u,d quarks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref1">1</xref>] . In contrast, about 99% of mass of matter in our universe are created by the</p><p>strong interaction, apart from the dark sector. In fact, a large constituent quark mass of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> arises from non-perturbative dynamics in QCD. Thus, QCD gives another category of mass generation.</p><p>Such a dynamical fermion-mass generation in the strong interaction was first pointed out by Y. Nambu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref2">2</xref>] in 1961 in the context of spontaneous chiral-symmetry breaking. The QCD-based quantitative analysis of dynamical fermion mass generation was performed by Higashijima and Miransky in 1980’s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref4">4</xref>] using the Schwinger-Dyson formalism. Thus, light u,d-quarks are considered to acquire a large constituent quark mass of about 300 - 400 MeV, in accordance with spontaneous chiral-symmetry breaking.</p><p>Even without chiral symmetry breaking, however, it is likely that QCD has several dynamical mass generation mechanism. For example, while the charm quark has no chiral symmetry, some difference seems to</p><p>appear between current and constituent masses for charm quarks: the current mass is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> GeV at renor- malization point <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref1">1</xref>] , and the constituent charm quark mass is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the quark model.</p><p>The gluon is more drastic case. While the gluon mass is zero in perturbation QCD, the non-perturbative effect of the self-interaction of gluons seems to generate a large effective mass of 0.6 GeV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref7">7</xref>] , and the lowest glueball mass is about 1.6GeV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref9">9</xref>] . Furthermore, the dynamical mass generation for scalar-quark have been studied in the lattice scalar-QCD calculation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref10">10</xref>] . Thus, we deduce that “quantum color dynamics” generally accompanies a large mass generation, due to the strong interaction.</p><p>Next, let us consider compositeness of hadrons in terms of quarks. As an infrared effective theory, the constituent quark model has been successful for the description of the hadron spectroscopy. The constituent</p><p>quark belongs to the fundamental representation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> color group, and many hadrons can be</p><p>classified as the color-singlet (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) bound states of some quarks and antiquarks. In this picture, ordinary mesons and baryons are identified as quark-antiquark and three-quark systems, respectively. However, besides the ordinary baryons and mesons, QCD allows the existence of other color-singlet states, such as glueballs, hybrids and multi-quark states, called exotic hadrons. Recent experiments have reported the candidates for these exotic states [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref1">1</xref>] . The heavy hadrons, which includes one or more heavy (anti)quarks, are also recent hot topics in hadron physics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref12">12</xref>] . For example, very recently, LHCb has reported the discovery of two charmed pentaquarks, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(4380) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4450), from a careful analysis of the decay product in the high-energy process, and this report seems to activate the multi-quark physics again [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>In the theoretical study of these states, the diquark picture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref15">15</xref>] has been discussed as an important effective degree of freedom. The diquark is composed of two quarks with strong correlation, where the</p><p>one-gluon-exchange interaction between two quarks is attractive in the color anti-triplet <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> channel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref17">17</xref>] , of which color is the same as an anti-quark. In <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> flavor case, the flavor-antisymmetric and spin-singlet</p><p>with even parity is the most attractive channel in diquark, which is called scalar diquark. If the diquark correlation is developed in a hadron, this scalar diquark channel would be favored. The diquark correlation in a hadron is discussed in various situations, such as tetra-quarks, heavy baryons and other exotic states [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref19">19</xref>] . The tetra-quark states as the bound state of the diquark/antidiquark is suggested in early day [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref20">20</xref>] , and X(3872) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref21">21</xref>] and X(1576) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref22">22</xref>] are considered as tetra-quark states. Light flavor mesons as tetra-quark [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref23">23</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref32">32</xref>] and mixing with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> state [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref33">33</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref35">35</xref>] are discussed. There are various studies the heavy baryons focused on diquark [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref36">36</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref40">40</xref>] , e.g., single heavy quark/light diquark (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) picture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref41">41</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref45">45</xref>] . The other exotic states including heavy quark(s) are studied [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref46">46</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref52">52</xref>] . The ordinary baryon properties focused on the diquarks have been also discussed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref53">53</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref57">57</xref>] . The diquark correlation is found in the lattice QCD simulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref58">58</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref61">61</xref>] . It is also considered that the diquark condensation is occurred in an extremely high density system, called the color superconductivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref62">62</xref>] . We note that diquark properties strongly depend on the color number<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. If we consider the two-color QCD, the diquarks compose the color singlet (baryons). The strength of correlation between two quarks is same as quark/antiquark channel, and the (diquark-)baryons correspond to the mesons. This fact is known as the Pauli-</p><p>G&#252;rsey symmetry. The quark-hadron matter in two-color system is investigated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref63">63</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref69">69</xref>] . For the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> case, the diquarks belong to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. As an interesting fact for the case, the diquark contents must be different between baryons and tetra-quarks. In fact, the diquark <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in an <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> baryon <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> belongs to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which is self-adjoint. On the other hand, the diquark in a tetra-quark <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> belongs to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. From this viewpoint, the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> case is rather special, because the diquarks belong to the same color <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in both cases of baryon <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and tetra-quark<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The properties of diquarks such as the mass and size are not understood well, although the diquarks have been discussed as important object of hadron physics. While the diquark is made by two quarks with gluonic interaction, it still strongly interacts with gluons additionally because of its non-zero color charge. Therefore, such dressing effect of gluons for diquark should be considered in a non-perturbative way. The dynamics of diquark and gluons may affect the structure of hadrons. In the quark-hadron physics, the Schwinger-Dyson (SD) formalism is often used to evaluate the non-perturbative effect based on QCD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref70">70</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref78">78</xref>] . In this paper, we apply the SD formalism to scalar diquark to investigate the effective mass of scalar diquark, which reflects a non-perturbative dressing effect by gluons. The scalar diquark is treated as an extended field like a meson in effective hadron models, and interacts with the gluons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref42">42</xref>] .</p><p>For the argument of the scalar diquark, it would be important to consider its effective size. For, point scalar particles generally have large radiative corrections even in the perturbation theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref79">79</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref80">80</xref>] . As an example, in the framework of the grand unified theory (GUT), the Higgs scalar field suffers from a large radiative correction of the GUT energy scale, and therefore severe “fine-tuning” is inevitably required to realize the low-lying Higgs mass of about 126 GeV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref81">81</xref>] , which leads to the notorious hierarchy problem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref79">79</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref80">80</xref>] . The Higgs propagator with radiative correction has been investigated by setting the mass renormalization condition to reproduce 126 GeV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref82">82</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref84">84</xref>] . A similar large radiative correction also appears for point-like scalar-quarks, which correspond to compact scalar diquarks, in scalar lattice QCD calculations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref10">10</xref>] . In fact, the point-like scalar-quark</p><p>interacting with gluons acquires a large extra mass of about 1.5 GeV at the cutoff<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where a is the</p><p>lattice spacing. Such a large-mass acquirement would be problematic in describing hadrons with scalar diquarks. However, since it is a bound-state-like object inside a hadron, the diquark must have an effective size. This effect gives a natural UV cutoff of the theory, and reduces the large radiative correction. Then, we take account of the effective size and investigate the mass of the scalar diquark inside a hadron within the SD formalism.</p><p>This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we review the SD formalism for the light quark, as the typical fermion mass generation in QCD. In Section 3, we investigate the SD equation for the scalar diquark, where a simple form factor is introduced for the possible size of diquark. In Section 4, we present the numerical result of the diquark self-energy with the dependence of the bare mass and size of diquark, and briefly discuss the dynamical mass generation for the scalar diquark in the SD formalism. Section 5 is devoted to conclusion and discussion.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Dynamical Mass Generation of Quarks in QCD</title><p>The chiral symmetry is a fundamental symmetry in the light-quark sector of QCD, and it is an exact global symmetry in the chiral limit. In the low-energy region of QCD, spontaneous chiral-symmetry breaking takes place, which generates a large effective mass of light quarks. Actually, in the theoretical analysis with the Schwinger-Dyson (SD) formalism in QCD, a large self-energy generation of quarks is demonstrated in an infrared region, which breaks the chiral symmetry in the physically stable vacuum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref4">4</xref>] . In this section, as the standard fermionic mass generation in QCD, we briefly review the quark mass generation in the SD formalism for QCD in the Landau gauge, which is frequently used. This review part gives a important basis for the non-perturbative QCD physics, and is also useful to set up the formalism for the scalar diquark case in Section 3.</p><p>As a merit of the Lorentz-covariant gauge like the Landau gauge, the dressed quark propagator is generally described as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with the wave function renormalization <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the self-energy of quark<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The general and exact SD equation for the quark propagation is diagrammatically</p><p>expressed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. In principle, the quark propagator is exactly obtained by solving this equation, if the exact form of the gluon propagator and the quark-gluon vertex are given. Here, the kernel in the SD equation</p><p>depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> is expressed by the product of the quark-gluon vertex <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the gluon dressing function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref85">85</xref>] ,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula206"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) denotes the generator of the SU(N<sub>c</sub>) color group.</p><p>In the most SD studies for quarks, one takes the rainbow-ladder approximation with the renormalization- group improvement of the quark-gluon vertex at the one-loop level. Note that, owing to the iterative structure of the SD equation, a simplified full-order treatment on the coupling <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be achieved, even with the use of the one-loop level vertex and so on. In actual, by the diagrammatical expansion, one can easily confirm the inclusion of infinite order of the coupling<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and the non-perturbative effect of gluons is thus included in this formalism. Recall that any nontrivial vacuum cannot be expressed by the perturbation theory.</p><p>Here, we briefly mention the treatment of quark confinement in the SD approach. In most works of the SD approach, the confinement effect is ignored, which seems problematic for the study of QCD. On this point, several recent studies, both analytical works [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref86">86</xref>] and lattice QCD simulations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref87">87</xref>] , have suggested that chiral symmetry breaking and quark confinement are not directly correlated in QCD. If this is the case, even without confinement, one may be able to discuss chiral symmetry breaking in QCD, as is the SD approach.</p><p>At the one-loop level of renormalization-group improvement, the SD kernel is approximated as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula207"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the Landau-gauge gluon propagator is given as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula208"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then, by taking Dirac trace or the trace after multiplying<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the SD equation for the quark is expressed by the coupled integral equations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula209"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula210"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the bare quark mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the Casimir operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the SU(3) color case.</p><p>We use one-loop level renormalization-group-improved coupling in the case of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> The Schwinger-Dyson equation for the quark field. The shaded blob denotes the self-energy of the quark<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the black dot the bare quark-gluon vertex, the shaded triangle the dressed vertex<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the solid line the quark propagator and the curly line the gluon propagator</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x53.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula211"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with an infrared regularization of a simple cut at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which leads to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and the QCD scale parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref73">73</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref77">77</xref>] . The subscript E, such as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, denotes the value in Euclidean space. The infrared regularization has been introduced to avoid the divergent pole at<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The behavior of the coupling is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> in the Euclidean space. All the figures for the numerical results will be in the Euclidean space.</p><p>The Higashijima-Miransky approximation is to take the larger value of the argument (Euclidean momenta) in the coupling as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and this approximation is also frequently used in the SD approach for quarks, because <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is analytically obtained in the Landau gauge and the computation becomes quite simplified for the quark self-energy<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula212"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the Wick rotation has been taken. (For the detail, see, e.g., Appendix in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref73">73</xref>] .) The result of the SD equation is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> in the chiral limit<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. There is a small cusp structure at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> due to the coupling behavior Equation (6). The ultraviolet cutoff <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is taken as 5 GeV. The self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The behavior of the running coupling of our model <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as a function of the momentum p in the Euclidean space. The thin line is the one-loop renormalization group improved running coupling. We introduce a simple cut at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as an infrared regularization</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x70.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> The quark self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as a function of the momentum p in the chiral limit. The self-energy is large in the low momentum region and goes to zero monotonously with the momentum</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x73.png"/></fig><p>unchanged even the cutoff is taken 10 GeV. The quark mass is large at the infrared region and monotonously goes to zero with the momentum, which reflects spontaneous chiral-symmetry breaking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref88">88</xref>] .</p><p>The scale parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is chosen to reproduce chiral properties for quarks in the SD formalism with the Higashijima-Miransky approximation in the Landau gauge, while the ordinary QCD scale parameter is around<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The self-energy leads to the pion decay constant with the Pagels-Stokar approximation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref89">89</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula213"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the (unrenormalized) chiral condensate:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula214"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since the pion decay constant is a physical value, its renormalization is not required and it does not depend on the ultraviolet cutoff<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Hence, the upper limit of the integration has been taken as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. On the other hand, the chiral condensate depends on the renormalization point. We adopt a standard renormalization point</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref1">1</xref>] , and consider the chiral condensate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> according to the renormalization-group formula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref73">73</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref74">74</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref77">77</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula215"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> corresponding to the lowest coefficient of the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> function of the renormalization group. Taking the scale parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as 500 MeV and the ultraviolet cutoff <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as 5 GeV, the pion decay constant and the chiral condensate are fixed as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>respectively. We have numerically checked that they are stable against the variation of the ultraviolet cutoff<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The SD formalism with the approximations in the Landau gauge reproduces these chiral properties well.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Schwinger-Dyson Equation for the Scalar Diquark</title><p>In this section, we investigate the scalar diquark, i.e., an extended colored scalar object, and its mass generation, using the Schwinger-Dyson (SD) formalism.</p><p>Diquark is a bound-state-like object of two quarks and decomposed into color anti-triplet <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and sextet <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and flavor anti-triplet <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and sextet <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in SU(3) flavor case. The most attractive channel for diquark is the color and flavor anti-triplet <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and spin singlet with even parity <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by one gluon exchange [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref17">17</xref>] and by instanton interactions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref90">90</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref91">91</xref>] , which is called scalar diquark. If the diquark correlation is developed in a hadron such as a heavy baryon (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>), this scalar diquark channel would be favored. We consider the scalar</p><p>diquark as an effective degree of freedom with a peculiar size, assuming it to be an extended scalar field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref42">42</xref>] like a meson in the effective hadron models. The scalar diquark is composed of two quarks with the gluonic interaction, and still affected by non-perturbative gluonic effects since it has non-zero color charge as shown <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. The dynamics of the scalar diquark field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is expected to be described by the gauge-invariant scalar-QCD-type Lagrangian:</p><p><img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x102.png" /><img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x101.png" /> (11)</p><p>where the bare diquark mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the gauge field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (gluon) with the generator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> have been introduc-</p><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> The two types of gluonic interaction for a diquark: (a) inter-two-quarks gluonic interaction to form a diquark and (b) gluonic dressing for the diquark due to its non-zero color charge. The single line denotes a quark, the double line a diquark and the curly line a gluon.</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x106.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>ed. We note that the scalar diquark has the 4-point interaction term of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> type, which is different from the quark. In general, such gauged scalar fields accompany the 4-point interaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref79">79</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref82">82</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref84">84</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref92">92</xref>] .</p><p>Since the diquark is a bound-state-like object confined in a hadron, it must have an effective size and its size should be smaller than the hadron. In order to include the size effect of diquark, we introduce a simple “form factor” in the four-dimensional Euclidean space as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula216"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x108.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the momentum cutoff <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> corresponds to the inverse of the diquark size R. In this paper, we set<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Since the radiative correction for the scalar particle is generally large, this form factor has also a role of the convergence factor. As for the form factor<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it has the roles of introducing an effective size and convergence of the SD equation, so one can use arbitrary function such as the step function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the exponential function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and so on. In this study, we take Equation (12) with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to simple analysis and the convergence of the SD equation. The size effect of the diquark can be included in the vertex as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>While the scalar QCD Lagrangian (11) is renormalizable, this theory is an effective cutoff theory with an UV cutoff parameter<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which corresponds to the inverse size of the scalar diquark. Here, the scalar diquark cannot be observed as an isolated object, and has no characteristic symmetry, such as the chiral symmetry, so that it is difficult to set the renormalization condition. Instead, we introduce an effective size <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the diquark, which leads to a natural UV cutoff in the theory. As we will see later, the effective size of diquark will play an important role for the convergent of loop integrations, and therefore we will not take the limit of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>). In fact, the extended diquark is treated as the effective degrees of freedom appearing in the QCD system of quarks and gluons, and hence, also for the scalar diquark, we basically use the same framework as the</p><p>single quark case, presented in the previous section. For instance, we will use the same running coupling <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in Equation (6) for the argument of diquarks.</p><p>We now describe the SD equation for the scalar diquark, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. For the self-energy diagram, we include the first order of the coupling <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at the one-loop level, like the improved ladder QCD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref73">73</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref74">74</xref>] . Note however that, due to the iterative calculation, this formalism includes infinite order of the coupling <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and describes non-perturbative effects. It is also notable that the same form of the running coupling for the quark/gluon coupling can be used even for the scalar diquark/gluon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref93">93</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref94">94</xref>] . (In particular, in the heavy mass limit of colored particles, the QCD interaction depends only on their color.) Since the scalar diquark corresponds to an antiquark in terms of the color representation, we may use the same form of the running coupling even for the scalar diquark case. Then, the SD equation for the scalar diquark is diagrammatically expressed as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> and is written by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula217"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x123.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> The Schwinger-Dyson equation for the scalar diquark. The shaded blob is the self-energy<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the dashed line denotes the scalar diquark propagator and the curly line the gluon propagator. The last term arisig from 4-point interaction is the peculiar term in gauged scalar theories, and it does not appear in the single quark case in QCD</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x124.png"/></fig><p>In the right-hand side of Equation (13), the second term arises from the 4-point vertex and the third term is lead from the 3-point vertex, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. Here, we do not consider the wave functional renor- malization, as is often assumed for the quark field in the Landau gauge. Similarly in the single quark case, we adopt the Higashijima-Miransky approximation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for the 3-point vertex, and finally obtain the SD equation for the self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the scalar diquark:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula218"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x128.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Numerical Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. The Parameter Setting</title><p>The bare mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and cutoff <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (inverse of the size R) are free parameters of the diquark theory. In this subsection, we consider the possible range of these parameters from the physical viewpoint.</p><p>The diquark is originally made of two consistent quarks, and the color-Coulomb interaction is one of the main attractive forces. We here estimate the color-Coulomb interaction between the two massive quarks from the</p><p>three-quark (3Q) potential [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref99">99</xref>] , or generally from the mult-quark potential such as 4Q(<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and 5Q(<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) potentials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref100">100</xref>] . In SU(3) lattice QCD, the 3Q potential among the three quarks located at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is well reproduced by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66195-formula219"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x134.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the color-Coulomb coefficient<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the string tension <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the minimal flux-tube length <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref99">99</xref>] . Since the color-Coulomb potential energy between two quarks is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for the inter-quark distance R, the potential energy is estimated as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for the typical range of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and its value is not so large in comparison with the two-quark mass of about 600 MeV. [Note also that similar estimation also leads to a small value of the diquark-diquark interaction, which gives a reason of the absence of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the diquark Lagrangian (11).] The same result can be obtained from the multi-quark potential [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref100">100</xref>] , because the color-Coulomb coefficient is the same for two quarks in the diquark, i.e., <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>for n = 3, 4, 5. Therefore, the bare mass of diquark is expected to be simply considered as the twice of the quark mass.</p><p>In this paper, we consider two cases of the bare diquark mass. One is twice of constituent quark mass, i.e.,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The other is twice of the running quark self-energy, i.e., <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>is determined by the SD equation for single quark Equation (7). This means that the diquark is constructed by the two dressing quarks. The constant bare mass case is based on the constituent quark model like picture and the running bare mass case is the SD formalism with omitting the effect of the gluonic attraction force between two quarks. The diquark should be dressed by gluon furthermore because of its non-zero color charge.</p><p>The cutoff <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> corresponds to the diquark size in a hadron, R, i.e., <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, so the diquark should be smaller than the hadron. We also consider two cases of the size. One is the typical size of a baryon, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e., <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x149.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which gives the upper limit of the size (the lower limit of the cutoff). The diquark covers the baryon in this case. The second is the typical size of a constituent quark, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x149.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e., <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x149.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which gives the lower limit of the size (the upper limit of the cutoff).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. The Constant Bare Mass Case</title><p>We first show in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> the case of the constant bare mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with dependence on the cutoff<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The diquark self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is always larger than the bare mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and almost constant except for a small bump structure in an infrared region. The value of the self-energy is strongly depends on the cutoff<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, e.g., the “compact diquark” with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x157.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has a large mass.</p><p>The scalar QCD includes both 3-point and 4-point interactions, and the existence of 4-point interaction is diagrammatically different from the ordinary QCD. To see the role of each interaction, we consider the calculation of the artificial removal of 3-point interaction and 4-point interaction, respectively. In fact, we investigate the two cases: (a) removal of 4-point interaction and (b) removal of 3-point interaction. The result is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> in the case of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x158.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The bump structure appears in the case without the 4-point interaction term as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a). Although the diagrammatic expression of the SD equation for the scalar</p><fig-group id="fig6"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> The scalar diquark self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as a function of the momentum p in the constant bare mass case of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x161.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with (a)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x161.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x162.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e., <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x161.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x162.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x163.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and (b)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x161.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x162.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x163.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e.,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x161.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x162.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x163.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In both cases, there appears a small bump structure, which is displayed in the small window. In the left figure, the original bare mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x161.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x162.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x163.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is plotted for comparison.</title></caption><fig id ="fig6_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x159.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig7"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> The self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the case of (a) without 4-point interaction and (b) without 3-point interaction as the function of the momentum p. Here, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is taken. In the right figure, the original bare mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is plotted for comparison.</title></caption><fig id ="fig7_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x167.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>diquark without 4-point interaction term is analogous to the quark SD equation, the behavior is completely</p><p>different from the quark case. The diquark self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> starts from the bare mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at zero momentum, then decreases at low momentum and rises up to the original value 600 MeV. On the other hand, the quark self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x173.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> starts from a large value and goes to zero monotonously with the momentum. The</p><p>SD equation without 3-point interaction just rises the self-energy and keeps constant. The strong dependence of the cutoff <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x174.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (or the size R) mainly comes from the 4-point interaction term.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. The Running Bare Mass Case</title><p>We show in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> the case of the running bare mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with dependence on the cutoff<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The diquark self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> also strongly depends on the cutoff<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x178.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In the low-momentum region, the behavior of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x178.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x179.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> reflects the running property of the bare mass, especially in the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x178.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x179.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x180.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> case, the gluonic effect seems to be small, because of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x178.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x179.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x180.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x181.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In the high-momentum region, the diquark self-energy keeps a large value, while the bare mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x178.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x179.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x180.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x181.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x182.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> goes to zero. This suggests the mass generation of the scalar diquark by gluonic radiative correction.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Discussion on the Scalar Diquark Property</title><p>In this subsection, we discuss the mass and the size of the scalar diquark, with comparing to the chiral quark. One of the most important properties of single quark SD equation (7) is the existence of the trivial solution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the chiral limit<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In fact, the quark mass remains to be zero due to the chiral symmetry in the perturbative treatment, and the quark mass generation, i.e., chiral symmetry breaking, is realized by the non-perturbative gluonic interaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref4">4</xref>] . Such arguments can be done even in the limit of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x185.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which is consistent with the point quark as an elementary particle.</p><p>On the other hand, the SD equation (13) for scalar diquark has no trivial solution and is a highly non-linear equation, even in the zero bare mass limit<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x186.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For example, the 4-point interaction term gives a strong dependence of the UV cutoff<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x186.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x187.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This is similar to the framework of GUT, where the Higgs scalar field suffers from a large radiative correction of the GUT energy scale.</p><p>Actually, the scalar diquark self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> strongly depends on the diquark size <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x189.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in both cases of the bare mass. In an extreme case of the point-like limit<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x189.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x190.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e., <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x189.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x190.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x191.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the diquark effective mass diverges. This suggests that the simple treatment of point-like diquarks is somehow dangerous in hadron models and the diquark must have an effective size.</p><p>As a quantitative argument, our calculations show that the “compact diquark” with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has a large effective mass in both cases, and does not seem to be acceptable in effective models for hadrons. In fact, the appropriate diquark is not so compact as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x193.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> but is fairly extended as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x193.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x194.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><fig-group id="fig8"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> The scalar diquark self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as a function of the momentum p in the running bare mass case with (a) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x197.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x197.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x198.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and (b) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x197.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x198.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x199.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x197.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x198.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x199.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x200.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>). The bare mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x197.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x198.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x199.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x200.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x201.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is also plotted with the dotted line for comparison.</title></caption><fig id ="fig8_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x195.png"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Mass Generation for Colored Scalar Particle</title><p>Finally, we consider the zero bare-mass case of diquark,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x202.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Even for a finite mass of quark, the bare mass of diquark can be zero, if the attraction between two quarks extremely strong. The result is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> for the two cases: (a) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x202.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x203.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and (b) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x202.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x203.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x204.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>on the cutoff. The self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x202.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x203.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x204.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x205.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is always</p><p>finite and takes a large value even for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x206.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The mass generation mechanism in QCD is usually considered in the context of spontaneous chiral-symmetry breaking. On the other hand, our scalar diquark theory is composed</p><p>of an effective scalar diquark field <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x207.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and does not have the chiral symmetry explicitly, although the</p><p>original diquark is constructed by two chiral quarks. Nevertheless, the effective mass of diquark emerges by the non-perturbative gluonic effect. In fact, the mechanism of dynamical mass generation seems to work in the</p><p>scalar diquark theory, even without chiral symmetry breaking. If we take<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x208.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the diquark self-energy is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x208.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x209.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This result seems to be consistent with the lattice QCD result on the colored scalar particle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref10">10</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion and Discussion</title><p>We have studied various mass generation of colored particles and gluonic dressing effect in a non-perturbative manner, using the Schwinger-Dyson (SD) formalism in QCD. First, we have briefly reviewed dynamical quark-mass generation in QCD in the SD approach as a typical fermion-mass generation via spontaneous chiral-symmetry breaking. Second, using the SD formalism for scalar QCD, we have investigated the scalar diquark, a bound-state-like object of two quarks, and its mass generation, which is clearly non-chiral-origin. Considering the possible size of the diquark inside a hadron, the effect of diquark size R is introduced as a cutoff</p><p>parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x210.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the form factor, as is used in effective theories.</p><p>The basic technology of scalar SD formalism is imported from the single quark case, such as the running coupling, the approximations and so on. Since the diquark is located in and construct of a hadron, the size should be smaller than the hadron (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x211.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and larger than the constituent quark (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x211.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x212.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>). The size (cutoff) dependence of self-energy have been investigated. We have considered the two cases of the constant</p><p>bare mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x213.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the running bare mass<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x213.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x214.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The diquark self-energy strongly depends on the size <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x213.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x214.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x215.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in both cases, especially the small diquark (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x213.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x214.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x215.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x216.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) has a large effective mass by the gluonic dressing effect.</p><p>We find that the effective diquark mass is finite and large even for the zero bare-mass case, and the value strongly depends on the size R, which is an example of dynamical mass generation by the gluonic effect, without chiral symmetry breaking. The mass difference between current and constituent charm quark mass and the large glueball mass are also examples of this type of mass generation. In this sense, spontaneous chiral-symmetry breaking may be a special case of massless (or small mass) fermion. As was conjectured in Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref10">10</xref>] , it would be a general property of strong interacting theory that all colored particles acquire a large effective mass by the dressing effect, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0.</p><fig-group id="fig9"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> The scalar diquark self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x218.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as a function of the momentum p in the massless case of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x218.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x219.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>: (a) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x218.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x219.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x220.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x218.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x219.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x220.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x221.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and (b) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x218.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x219.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x220.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x221.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x222.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x218.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x219.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x220.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x221.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x222.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x223.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>). The self-energy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x218.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x219.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x220.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x221.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x222.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x223.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x224.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is finite in both cases.</title></caption><fig id ="fig9_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x217.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> The schematic picture for dynamical mass generation of the colored particle. The colored particle (solid line) interacting with the gluons (curly line). The effective mass emerges by the non-perturbative interaction even without the chiral symmetry</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x225.png"/></fig><p>In this study, we have mainly investigated the diquark properties, and have not calculated physical quantities. It is however desired to describe the color-singlet states such as heavy baryon <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x226.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> based on the scalar theory. One of description of diquark based on QCD is the Bethe-Salpeter (BS) formalism for two quarks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref95">95</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref98">98</xref>] . However, the treatment of the scalar diquark as an explicit degree of freedom <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x226.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x227.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a good approximation for the structure of the heavy baryons. The constituent scalar-quark(diquark)/quark picture in the scalar lattice QCD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref10">10</xref>] and the structure of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x226.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x227.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x228.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x226.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x227.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x228.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x229.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>quarks) with explicit diquark degree of freedom using QCD sum rule [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref42">42</xref>] have been discussed. The description of the heavy baryon as heavy quark/diquark (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x226.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x227.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x228.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x229.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x230.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) using the BS equation will be investigated as our future work.</p><p>The tetra-quark states <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502648x231.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> may include diquark/antidiquark components. Although the two mesons molecular states may dominate in the tetra-quark due to the strong correlation between quark and antiquark, the diquark/antidiquark would be also important components [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref21">21</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref25">25</xref>] . The tetra-quark states would be described as the linear combination of two mesons and diquark/antidiquark states based on the BS formalism. The structure of sigma meson (light scalar mesons) is also applicable subject. The sigma meson is considered as a chiral partner of the pion in the context of the chiral symmetry, which structure is quark/antiquark bound state. The possibility of the light scalar mesons as four-quark states have been discussed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref23">23</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66195-ref35">35</xref>] . The structure of the sigma meson (light scalar mesons) can be described as the linear combination of quark/antiquark, diquark/antidiquark and two mesons in the context of the BS formalism.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>S.I. thanks T.M. Doi, H. Iida and N. Yamanaka for useful discussion and comments. This work is in part sup- ported by the Grant for Scientific Research [Priority Areas “New Hadrons” (E01:21105006), (C) No.23540306, No.15K05076] from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Science and Technology of Japan.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Shotaro Imai,Hideo Suganum, (2016) Non-Perturbative Analysis of Various Mass Generation by Gluonic Dressing Effect with the Schwinger-Dyson Formalism in QCD. Journal of Modern Physics,07,790-805. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2016.78073</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.66195-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olive, K.A., et al., Particle Data Group (2014) Chinese Physics, C38, Article ID: 090001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nambu, Y. and Jona-Lasinio, G. (1961) Physical Review, 122, 345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.122.345 
Nambu, Y. and Jona-Lasinio, G. (1961) Physical Review, 124, 246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.124.246</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miransky, V.A. (1983) Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, 38, 280.Miransky, V.A. (1994) Dynamical Symmetry Breaking in Quantum Field Theories. World Sicentific, Singapore.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Higashijima, K. (1984) Physical Review, D29, 1228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.29.1228 
Higashijima, K. (1991) Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 104, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.104.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iritani, T., Suganuma, H. and Iida, H. (2009) Physical Re-view, D80, Article ID: 114505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.114505</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mandula, J. and Ogilvie, M. (1987) Physics Letters, B185, 127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91541-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amemiya, K. and Suganuma, H. (1999) Physical Review, D60, Article ID: 114509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.114509 
Gongyo, S. and Suganuma, H. (2013) Physical Review, D87, Article ID: 074506.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.074506 
Gongyo, S., Iritani, T. and Suganuma, H. (2012) Physical Review, D86, Article ID: 094018.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.094018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morningstar, C.J. and Peardon, M.J. (1999) Physical Review, D60, Article ID: 034509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.034509</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ishii, N., Suganuma, H. and Matsufuru, H. (2002) Physical Review, D66, Article ID: 094506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.66.094506</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iida, H., Suganuma, H. and Takahashi, T.T. (2007) Physical Review, D75, Article ID: 114503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.114503 
Iida, H., Suganuma, H. and Takahashi, T.T. (2007) Modern Physics Letters, A23, 2344 
Iida, H., Suganuma, H. and Takahashi, T.T. (2008) AIP Conference Proceedings, 915, 256. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2750775</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brambilla, N., et al. (2011) The European Physical Journal C, 71, 1534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1534-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cho, S., et al., ExHIC Collaboration (2011) Physical Review Letters, 106, Article ID: 212001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.212001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aaij, R., et al., LHCb Collaboration (2015) Physical Review Letters, 115, Article ID: 072001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.072001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lichtenberg, D. and Tassie, L. (1967) Physical Review, 155, 1601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.155.1601</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ida, M. and Kobayashi, R. (1966) Progress of Theoretical Physics, 36, 846-847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.36.846</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Rujula, A., Georgi, H. and Glashow, S. (1975) Physical Review D, 12, 147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.12.147</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DeGrand, T.A., Jaffe, R., Johnson, K. and Kiskis, J. (1975) Physical Review D, 12, 2060. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.12.2060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaffe, R. (2005) Physics Reports, 409, 1-45, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2004.11.005 
Jaffe, R. (2005) Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements 142, 343-355. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2005.01.058</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Close, F. (2005) International Journal of Modern Physics A, 20, 5156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X05028661</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaffe, R.L. (1977) Physical Review D, 15, 267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.15.267</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maiani, L., Piccinini, F., Polosa, A. and Riquer, V. (2005) Physical Review D, 71, Article ID: 014028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.014028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ding, G.-J. and Yan, M.-L. (2006) Physics Letters B, 643, 33-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2006.10.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, A., Huang, T. and Steele, T. (2007) Physical Review D, 76, Article ID: 036004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.036004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, H.-J. (2006) The European Physical Journal A, 30, 423-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2006-10104-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heupel, W., Eichmann, G. and Fischer, C.S. (2012) Physics Letters B, 718, 545-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alford, M.G. and Jaffe, R. (2000) Nuclear Physics B, 578, 367-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00155-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suganuma, H., Tsumura, K., Ishii, N. and Okiharu, F. (2007) Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 168, 168- 172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.168.168</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prelovsek, S., Draper, T., Lang, C.B., Limmer, M., Liu, K.-F., Mathur, N. and Mohler, D. (2010) Physical Review D, 82, Article ID: 094507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.094507</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wakayama, M., et al., SCALAR Collaboration (2015) Physical Review D, 91, Article ID: 094508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.094508</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alexandrou, C., Daldrop, J.O., Brida, M.D., Gravina, M., Scorzato, L., Urbach, C. and Wagner, M. (2013) Journal of High Energy Physics, 1304, 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2013)137</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, H.-X., Hosaka, A. and Zhu, S.-L. (2007) Physical Review D, 76, Article ID: 094025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.094025 
Chen, H.-X., Hosaka, A. and Zhu, S.-L. (2007) Physics Letters B, 650, 369-372. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.05.031 
Chen, H.-X., Hosaka, A. and Zhu, S.-L. (2006) Physical Review D, 74, Article ID: 054001. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.054001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, H.-X., Hosaka, A., Toki, H. and Zhu, S.-L. (2010) Physical Review D, 81, Article ID: 114034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.114034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sugiyama, J., Nakamura, T., Ishii, N., Nishikawa, T. and Oka, M. (2007) Physical Review D, 76, Article ID: 114010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.114010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fariborz, A.H., Jora, R. and Schechter, J. (2008) Physical Review D, 77, Article ID: 094004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.094004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">'t Hooft, G., Isidori, G., Maiani, L., Polosa, A. and Riquer, V. (2008) Physics Letters B, 662, 424-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2008.03.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rosner, J.L. (2007) Physical Review D, 75, Article ID: 013009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.75.013009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, X.-H., Thomas, A.W. and Williams, A.G. (1999) Physical Review D, 59, Article ID: 116007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.116007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weng, M.-H., Guo, X.-H. and Thomas, A. (2011) Physical Review D, 83, Article ID: 056006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.056006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mehen, T. and Tiburzi, B.C. (2006) Physical Review D, 74, Article ID: 054505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.054505</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Selem, A. and Wilczek, F. (2005) Ha-dron Systematics and Emergent Diquarks. Proceedings of Ringberg Workshop on New Trends in HERA Physics, Ringberg Castle, Tegernsee, Germany, 2-7 Oct 2005. arXiv:hep-ph/0602128 http://inspirehep.net/record/710535</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hernandez, E., Nieves, J. and Verde-Velasco, J. (2008) Physics Letters B, 666, 150-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, K., Jido, D. and Lee, S.H. (2011) Physical Review C, 84, Article ID: 025204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.025204 
Kim, K., Jido, D. and Lee, S.H. (2013) Few-Body Systems, 54, 271-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00601-012-0343-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martynenko, A. and Saleev, V. (1996) Physics Letters B, 385, 297-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(96)00848-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gomshi Nobary, M. and Sepahvand, R. (2007) Physical Review D, 76, Article ID: 114006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.114006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ebert, D., Feldmann, T., Kettner, C. and Reinhardt, H. (1998) International Journal of Modern Physics A, 13, 1091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X98000482 
Ebert, D., Faustov, R. and Galkin, V. (2011) Physical Review D, 84, Article ID: 014025. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.014025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaffe, R.L. and Wilczek, F. (2003) Physical Review Letters, 91, Article ID: 232003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.232003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, S.H. and Yasui, S. (2009) The European Physical Journal C, 64, 283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1140-x 
Lee, S.H., Yasui, S., Liu, W. and Ko, C.M. (2008) The European Physical Journal C, 54, 259-265. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0516-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shuryak, E. and Zahed, I. (2004) Physics Letters B, 589, 21-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.03.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hong, D.K., Sohn, Y.J. and Zahed, I. (2004) Physics Letters B, 596, 191-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.06.073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karliner, M. and Lipkin, H.J. (2003) Physics Letters B, 575, 249-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.09.062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hyodo, T., Liu, Y.-R., Oka, M., Sudoh, K. and Yasui, S. (2013) Physics Letters B, 721, 56-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.02.045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yasui, S. and Oka, M. (2007) Physical Review D, 76, Article ID: 034009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.034009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bacchetta, A., Conti, F. and Radici, M. (2008) Physical Review D, 78, Article ID: 074010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.074010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lichtenberg, D., Namgung, W., Predazzi, E. and Wills, J. (1982) Physical Review Letters, 48, 1653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1653</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferretti, J., Vassallo, A. and Santopinto, E. (2011) Physical Review C, 83, Article ID: 065204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.065204</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nagata, K. and Hosaka, A. (2004) Progress of Theoretical Physics, 111, 857-870. http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.111.857</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fredriksson, S., Jandel, M. and Larsson, T. (1982) Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 14, 35-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01547961</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alexandrou, C., de Forcrand, P. and Lucini, B. (2006) Physical Re-view Letters, 97, Article ID: 222002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.222002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Babich, R., Garron, N., Hoelbling, C., Howard, J., Lellouch, L. and Rebbi, C. (2007) Physical Review D, 76, Article ID: 074021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.074021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DeGrand, T., Liu, Z. and Schaefer, S. (2008) Physical Review D, 77, Article ID: 034505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.034505</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hess, M., Karsch, F., Laermann, E. and Wetzorke, I. (1998) Physical Review D, 58, Article ID: 111502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.58.111502</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alford, M.G., Schmitt, A., Rajagopal, K. and Sch?fer, T. (2008) Reviews of Modern Physics, 80, 1455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1455 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Imai, S., Toki, H. and Weise, W. (2013) Nuclear Physics A, 913, 71-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ratti, C. and Weise, W. (2004) Physical Review D, 70, Article ID: 054013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.054013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harada, M., Nonaka, C. and Yamaoka, T. (2010) Physical Review D, 81, Article ID: 096003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.096003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Splittorff, K., Toublan, D. and Verbaarschot, J. (2002) Nuclear Physics B, 620, 290-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00536-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hands, S., Kim, S. and Skullerud, J.-I. (2007) The European Physical Journal A, 31, 787-789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2006-10173-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kogut, J.B., Toublan, D. and Sinclair, D.K. (2001) Physics Letters B, 514, 77-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00586-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strodthoff. N., Schaefer. B.-J. and von Smekal, L. (2012) Physical Review D, 85, Article ID: 074007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.074007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alkofer, R. and von Smekal, L. (2001) Physics Reports, 353, 281-465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00010-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maris, P. and Roberts, C.D. (2003) International Journal of Modern Physics E, 12, 297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218301303001326</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roberts, C.D. and Williams, A.G. (1994) Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 33, 477-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0146-6410(94)90049-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aoki, K.-I., Bando, M., Kugo, T., Mitchard, M.G. and Nakatani, H. (1990) Progress of Theoretical Physics, 84, 683- 701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/ptp/84.4.683</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kugo, T. and Mitchard, M.G. (1992) Physics Letters B, 286, 355-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(92)91787-A</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fischer, C.S. (2006) Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, 32, R253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/32/8/R02</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Munczek, H. (1995) Physical Review D, 52, 4736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.52.4736</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamanaka, N., Doi, T.M., Imai, S. and Suganuma, H. (2013), Physical Review D, 88, Article ID: 074036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.074036 
Yamanaka, N., Imai, S., Doi, T.M. and Suganuma, H. (2014) Physical Review, D, 89, Article ID: 074017. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.074017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Imai, S. and Suganuma, H. (2013) A Non-Perturbative Effect of Gluons for Scalar Diquark in the Schwinger-Dyson Formalism. Proceedings of XV International Conference on Hadron Spectroscopy. arXiv:1401.3099 [hep-ph] http://inspirehep.net/record/1277087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheng, T.-P. and Li, L.-F. (1988) Gauge Theory of Elementary Particle Physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peskin, M.E. and Schroeder, D.V. (1995) An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Frontiers in Physics). Westview Press, Boulder.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aad, G. et al., ATLAS Collaboration (2012) Physics Letters B, 716, 1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maas, A. (2011) The European Physical Journal C, 71, 1548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1548-yMaas, A. and Mufti, T. (2014) Journal of High Energy Physics, 1404, 006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Macher, V., Maas, A. and Alkofer, R. (2012) Inter-national Journal of Modern Physics A, 27, Article ID: 1250098. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X12500984</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hopfer, M. and Alkofer, R. (2013) Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement, 6, 929.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iida, H., Oka, M. and Suganuma, H. (2005) The European Physical Journal A, 23, 305-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2004-10082-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doi, T.M., Suganuma, H. and Iritani, T. (2014) Physical Review D, 90, Article ID: 094505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.094505 
Doi, T.M., Redlich, K., Sasaki, C. and Suganuma, H. (2015) Physical Review D, 92, Article ID: 094004.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.094004 
Suganuma, H., Doi, T.M. and Iritani, T. (2016) Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2016, Article ID: 013B06. http://ptep.oxfordjournals.org/content/2016/1/013B06</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iritani, T. and Suganuma, H. (2014) Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2014, Article ID: 033B03.Gongyo, S., Iritani, T. and Suganuma, H. (2012) Physical Review D, 86, Article ID: 034510.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.034510</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hatsuda, T. and Kunihiro, T. (1994) Physics Reports, 247, 221-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(94)90022-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pagel, H. and Stokar, S. (1979) Physical Review D, 20, 2947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.20.2947</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">'t Hooft, G. (1976) Physical Review D, 14, 3432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3432</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sch?fer, T. and Shuryak, E.V. (1998) Reviews of Modern Physics, 70, 323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.323 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Itzykson, C. and Zuber, J.-B. (2006) Quantum Field Theory. Dover Publications, Mineola.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marinho, J., Gambin, E. and Frederico, T. (2007) AIP Conference Proceedings, 884, 378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2710608</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salam, A. and Strathdee, J. (1978) Physical Review D, 18, 4713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.18.4713</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bender, A., Roberts, C.D. and Von Smekal, L. (1996) Physics Letters B, 380, 7-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(96)00372-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cahill, R., Roberts, C.D. and Praschifka, J. (1987) Physical Review D, 36, 2804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.36.2804</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Z., Wan, S. and Yang, W. (2007) Communications in Theoretical Physics, 47, 287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/47/2/020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bloch, J.C., Roberts, C.D., Schmidt, S., Bender, A. and Frank, M. (1999) Physical Review C, 60, Article ID: 062201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.60.062201 
Bloch, J.C., Roberts, C.D. and Schmidt, S. (1999) Physical Review C, 60, Article ID: 065208.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.60.065208</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takahashi, T.T., Matsufuru, H., Nemoto, Y. and Suganuma, H. (2001) Physical Review Letters, 86, 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.18 
Takahashi, T.T., Suganuma, H., Nemoto, Y. and Matsufuru, H. (2002) Physical Review D, 65, Article ID: 114509.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.114509 
Sakumichi, N. and Suganuma, H. (2015) Physical Review D, 92, Article ID: 034511.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.034511</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66195-ref100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okiharu, F., Suganuma, H. and Takahashi, T.T. (2005) Physical Review Letters, 94, Article ID: 192001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.192001 Okiharu, F., Suganuma, H. and Takahashi, T.T. (2005) Physical Review D, 72, Article ID: 014505.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.72.014505</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>