<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Computational Chemistry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2332-5968</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/cc.2016.42005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">CC-66081</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Oxidation and Complexation-Based Spectrophotometric Methods for Sensitive Determination of Tartrazine E102 in Some Commercial Food Samples
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>agda</surname><given-names>M. S. Saleh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elham</surname><given-names>Y. Hashem</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Najat</surname><given-names>O. A. Al- Salahi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>magdamssaleh@yahoo.com(AMSS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>04</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>64</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>25</month>	<year>April</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Two new sensitive spectrophotometric methods are reported for determination of tartrazine (Tz) (E102) in some commercial food samples. The first method involves two coupled reactions, the reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) by the analyte in acetate buffer medium (pH = 5.9) at 30&#176;C and the complexation reaction between Cu(I) and Tz oxidized form to yield Cu-Tz complex (method I). The other method is based on oxidation of Tz by alkaline KMnO4. These reactions are monitored spectrophotometrically at maximum absorbances 332 and 610 nm for methods (I and II) respectively. Variables affecting these reactions are carefully studied and the conditions are optimized. The stability constants are calculated at 293, 303, 313 and 323 K. The thermodynamic parameters, Gibb’s free energy change (ΔG), entropy change (ΔS), and enthalpy change (ΔH) associated with the complexation reaction are calculated and discussed. Under optimized conditions the proposed methods (I, II) obey Beer’s law 10.69 - 85.50, 5.34 - 34.12 μg&#183;ml
  <sup>-1</sup> of Tz respectively. The molar absorptivity, sandel sensitivity, detection and quantification limits are calculated. Matrix effects are also investigated. The methods are successfully applied to the quantification of Tz in different commercially food samples. The results obtained are in good agreement with those obtained by the reported methods at the 95% confidence level.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Tartrazine E102</kwd><kwd> Food Colorants</kwd><kwd> Complexation</kwd><kwd> KMnO4</kwd><kwd> Spectrophotometric Analysis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Food dyes are often added to foodstuffs and drinks in order to supply, intensify or restore their colour to create the desired coloured appearance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref1">1</xref>] . Synthetic dyes are widely used as they show several advantages compared with natural dyes such as high stability to light, oxygen and pH, colour uniformity, low microbiological contamination and relatively lower production costs. Tartrazine is a synthetic organic food dye that can be found in common food products such as bakery products, dairy products, candies, and beverages. According to the limitations of European Union [EU] and Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref2">2</xref>] , the presence and content of Tz dye must be controlled in food products due to their potential harmfulness to human beings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref3">3</xref>] . Also it appears to cause the most allergic and intolerance reaction of all the azo dyes, particularly among asthmatics and those with an aspirin intolerance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref5">5</xref>] . Therefore the determination of tartrazine in commercial food products is very important. Until now, different methods such as chromatography [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref6">6</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref12">12</xref>] , electroanalytical methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref13">13</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref15">15</xref>] and spectrophotometry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref16">16</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref24">24</xref>] , have been reported for the determination of tartrazine. However, some of these methods are not suitable for routine monitoring as they are time consuming, complicated and have poor sensitivity and selectivity. To the best of our knowledge, no spectrophotometer methods based on complexation with copper have been reported for the quantification of Tz. This paper describes the development of a simple, and rapid two spectrophotometric methods for the assay of Tz in food samples. The first method is based on oxidation of tartrazine by Cu(II) in acetate-acetic acid medium (pH = 5.9) at 30˚C followed by complex formation. The other method is based on oxidation of Tz with alkaline KMnO<sub>4</sub> under optimum conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Apparatus</title><p>An evolution 300 UV-Vis spectrophotometer with 1.0 cm matched cells fitted with vision pro software of Thermo Electronic Corporation (Cambridge, U.K.) was used for electronic spectral measurements. pH measurements were made with Jenway 3040 ion analyzer-pH meter, equipped with Jenway 924,005 combined glass electrode.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Chemicals</title><p>All chemicals were of analytical reagent grade. Deionized water was used to prepare all solutions. The tartrazine dye (E102) was supplied from Alfa Aesar (Germany). Stock standard solution containing 2.672 g・L<sup>−1</sup> of the dye was prepared in deionized water. The working solutions were prepared daily by appropriate dilution. A 5 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> mol・L<sup>−1</sup> of copper nitrate was prepared by dissolving the required amount in deionized water and standardized complexmetrically with EDTA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref25">25</xref>] . The ionic strength of the solutions was maintained at a constant value of I = 0.1 mol・L<sup>−1</sup> (NaClO<sub>4</sub>). Acetic acid (0.2 mol・L<sup>−1</sup>) sodium acetate (0.2 mol・L<sup>−1</sup>) buffer (pH = 5.9) was prepared in 100 ml volumetric flask. Potassium permanganate (Merck, Germany) 1 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup> mol・L<sup>−1</sup> was prepared in deionized water.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Preparation of Real Samples</title><p>Powdered gelatin samples (Lemon, pineapple, green apple, apricot, banana and peach) and powdered drinks (apple, orange and tamarind) were bought from local supermarket in Assiut city (Egypt). These samples contained sugars, fumaric and citric acids, beef gelatin, artificial flavour, colour (E102), tricalcium phosphate and aspartame. Each gelatin or drink samples were weighed exactly (about 1 g) and dissolved in 50 ml of deionized water. Then each solution was centrifuged (10 min, 3500 rpm) to remove the insoluble particles. The filtrate was collected in 100 ml volumetric flask and diluted to the mark with deionized water. For determination of Tz in the above real samples, 0.2 ml of sample solution was used and analyzed according to method I. Finally, the Tz content in food samples were determined using the calibration equation and standard addition calibration curves procedure.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. General Procedures</title><sec id="s2_4_1"><title>2.4.1. Method I (Complexation Reaction)</title><p>Into a 10 ml volumetric flasks, transfer a suitable aliquot of standard solution in deionized water containing up to 181.6 &#181;g of tartrazine and 4 ml of 2 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> mol・L<sup>−1</sup> of Cu(II) solution. After mixing, the mixture was buffered to pH 5.9 with acetic acid-acetate buffer. Dilute the resulting solution to volume with deionized water and measure the absorbance at 332 nm, 303 K by using 1.0 cm quartz cell against a similarly prepared blank of the same pH. The calibration graph was constructed by plotting absorbance vs. Tz concentration.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_2"><title>2.4.2. Method II (Oxidation with KMnO<sub>4</sub>)</title><p>Standard solutions in deionized water containing 16.031 - 187.03 &#181;g・ml<sup>−1</sup> Tz were transferred into individual 10 ml calibrated flasks, 4.0 ml of 1.0 mol・L<sup>−1</sup> sodium hydroxide solution was added followed by 2.0 ml of 1 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup> mol・L<sup>−1</sup> KMnO<sub>4</sub> solution and it was diluted to the final volume with deionized water. After 60 min, the absorbance was measured at 610 nm against reagent blank treated similarly.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Interference from Matrix</title><p>Samples were prepared by mixing 0.5344 mg of Tz (method I) or 0.267 mg (in case of method II) with various amounts of common matrix cations, anions, sugar, gelatin, aspartame and dyes such as sunset yellow, and allura red. The procedure was continued as described under general procedures.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Determination of the Thermodynamic Parameters</title><p>The decomposition of stability constant into its enthalpy change (DH), Gibbs free energy change (DG) and entropic (DS) contributions is of fundamental importance to understand the various factors that may influence coordination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref27">27</xref>] . Enthalpy changes due to coordination reactions can always be obtained from the determination of stability constants at different temperatures according to the Van’t Hoff [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref28">28</xref>] relationship (1, 2):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66081-formula1652"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66081-formula1653"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where R is ideal gas constant (8.314 JK<sup>−1</sup>・mol<sup>−1</sup>), K<sub>i</sub> is the stability constant of the complex and T is the absolute temperature in Kelvin (K).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Acid-Base Equilibria of Tartrazine</title><p>The absorption spectra of tartrazine salt (HL<sup>3−</sup>) solution (5 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup> mo・L<sup>−1</sup>) in aqueous medium at I = 0.1 mol・L<sup>−1</sup> (NaClO<sub>4</sub>), 25˚C were recorded at various pH values (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The food additive tartrazine salt (HL<sup>3−</sup>) yields four acid―base forms in solution of pH 0.86 - 12.4, H<sub>5</sub>L<sup>+</sup>, H<sub>2</sub>L<sup>2−</sup>, HL<sup>3−</sup> and L<sup>4−</sup> exhibiting the absorption maxima at 440, 430, 420 and 400 nm. The protonated acid form H<sub>5</sub>L<sup>+</sup> at azo-nitrogen (l<sub>max</sub> = 440 nm) predominates in strongly acidic medium (pH &lt; 3). The solution spectra of food colorant display a symmetrical and highly intense band (l<sub>max</sub> = 430 nm) at pH 3.2 - 4.3 corresponding to the protonated form of the dye salt (H<sub>2</sub>L<sup>2−</sup>). On decreasing, the acidity of the medium (4.2 - 6.5), a blue shift of the latter band at 420 nm is obtained resulting from dissociation of protonated nitrogen azo group (HL<sup>3−</sup>). The electronic spectra of Tz in aqueous medium within pH 7.2 - 10.4 exhibit a broad band at 400 nm with a shoulder at 425 nm corresponding to tautomeric equilibria of monoanionic form of tartrazine salt (L<sup>4−</sup>), Scheme 1. The absorbance versus pH graph were interpreted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref29">29</xref>] assuming that a particular equilibrium established under selected conditions. Under our experimental condition pKa<sub>1</sub> [H<sub>2</sub>L<sup>−2</sup>/HL<sup>−3</sup> (-HN=N-)] = 5.15 &#177; 0.10, pKa<sub>2</sub> [HL<sup>−3</sup>/L<sup>−4</sup> (OH)] = 9.25 &#177; 0.16.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Absorption Spectra of Tartrazine Reaction Products</title><p>Tartrazine likes Sudan dyes possess two reducible groups, a nitrogen-nitrogen double bond and a phenol group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref30">30</xref>] . A reduction process, which corresponds to a spontaneous auto-reduction of the Cu<sup>2+</sup> into Cu<sup>+</sup>, was observed in cases of complexation of Cu<sup>2+</sup> ions with sudan(I) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref31">31</xref>] and sudan(II) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref32">32</xref>] . Because of these features of sudan dyes, tartrazine is considered as chromogenic chelating and redox sensitive agent reacting with copper(II) to form Cu<sup>+</sup>-Tz complex under optimum conditions. On the basis of redox sensitivity in the Cu(II)-tartrazine</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Absorption spectra of 5 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup> mol・L<sup>−1</sup> tartrazine in aqueous medium, I = 0.1 mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup> (NaClO<sub>4</sub>), 25˚C at different pH values; 1, pH = 0.86; 2, pH = 0.9; 3, pH = 1.0; 4, pH 1.17; 5, pH = 1.6; 6, pH = 2.26; 7, pH = 2.73; 8, pH = 3.29; 9, pH = 3.73; 10, pH = 4.21; 11, pH = 5.7; 12, pH = 6.48; 13, pH = 7.19; 14, pH = 8.7; 15, pH = 9.2; 16, pH = 9.97; 17, pH = 10.58; 18, pH = 11.12; 19, pH = 12.83</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x9.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.66081-formula1654"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Scheme 1. Protonation process of tartrazine.</p><p>interaction in aqueous medium at I = 0.1 mol・L<sup>−1</sup> (NaClO<sub>4</sub>), pH = 5.9, 30˚C, solution spectrum shows an absorption band with a maximum at 332 nm corresponding to Cu(I)-Tz complex (MLCT) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b) shows the absorption spectrum obtained for alkaline KMnO<sub>4</sub> solution (l<sub>max</sub> = 530 nm). With addition of tartrazine solution, an absorption spectrum with two absorption bands at 390, 410 (double headed) and 610 nm was obtained. The latter band is attributed to the formation of manganate ion as a result of the oxidation of tartrazine with KMnO<sub>4</sub> in alkaline medium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref34">34</xref>] and the highly intense double headed band is related to Tz oxidized form.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Complexation Equilibria of Cu(II) with Tartrazine at Different Temperatures</title><p>The complexation equilibria of Cu<sup>2+</sup> with Tz were investigated at I = 0.1 mol・L<sup>−1</sup> (NaClO<sub>4</sub>) in aqueous medium over the pH range 3.5 - 10 at 293, 303, 313 and 323 K. The solution spectra were recorded in presence of an excess of the metal ion and in equimolar solutions. The absorption spectra for both metal/Tz ratios at various pH are analogous at the same temperature and exhibit an absorption band at 332 nm.</p><p>The absorbance versus pH graphs for the above solutions at different temperatures show the range of complex</p><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Absorption spectra of Tz-Cu(II) (pH = 5.9), I = 0.1 mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup> (1) Tz 2 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>5</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>; (2) Cu(II) 2 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>; (3) 1:1 Tz-Cu(II); [Cu<sup>2+</sup>] = [Tz] = 2 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>. (b) Absorption spectra of Tz-KMnO<sub>4</sub> reaction (in alkaline medium), (1) Tz 5 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>5</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>; (2) alkaline KMnO<sub>4</sub> (5 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>); (3) Tz-KMnO<sub>4</sub> reaction product [Tz] = 7 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>5</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>, [KMnO<sub>4</sub>] = 2 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>3</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>, [NaOH] = 0.4 mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x11.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x12.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>formation (3.0 - 6.5) and existence of one complex equilibria within the pH range studied (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a)). All graphs exhibit a similar descending branch above pH 6.5 which is due to the hydrolysis of the complexed Tz. The absorbance versus pH graphs for copper-Tz system at different temperatures were interpreted using relations derived earlier by Sommer et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref35">35</xref>] , Idriss et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref37">37</xref>] and Saleh et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref34">34</xref>] . The following Equations (3, 4) were valid for equimolar and solutions with an excess of metal ion respectively:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66081-formula1655"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.66081-formula1656"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>All symbols have their usual meanings. The logarithmic transformation are linear with a slope of q = 2, indicating the release of two protons during complexation and an intercept including K<sup>*</sup>. By considering the values of the dissociation constants of Tz under our experimental conditions, one can assume the following complexation equilibria with Cu(II) in the pH range 3.0 - 6.5.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66081-formula1657"><label>(A)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The mean equilibrium constant K<sup>*</sup> was determined at different temperatures by considering equilibrium A. the stability constant of Cu(I) complex is related to the equilibrium constant K<sup>*</sup> by the expression<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The calculated values of log K<sub>1</sub> for the complex at 293, 303, 313 and 323 K are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The proposed binding model of Tz-copper complex is shown below.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.66081-formula1658"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The proposed binding model of Tz with copper(I).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Thermodynamic Functions of Tartrazine-Copper(II) Reaction</title><p>According to Van’t Hoff equation the values of overall thermodynamic parameters DG, DH and DS accompanying complex formation have been determined (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)). The DH and DS values can then be considered as a sum of three contributions, Cu(II)-Tz redox reaction, release of H<sub>2</sub>O molecules from octahedral copper(II) ions and metal-ligand bond formation. From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the -ve value of DG for the complexation process Cu(I)-Tz suggests a spontaneous nature of such process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref38">38</xref>] . The +ve value of DH means that this reaction is endothermic favourable at high temperature. The +ve value of DS for the complexation process confirm that the Cu(I)-Tz complex formation is entropically favourable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref39">39</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Stability constants at different temperatures and thermodynamic parameters DG, DH and DS of copper(I)-Tz complex</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Complex species</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Log K<sub>1</sub> at temperature, K</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >-DG Kj・mol<sup>-</sup><sup>1 </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >DH Kj・mol<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >DS J・mol<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>・K<sup>-</sup><sup>1 </sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >293</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >303</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >313</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >323</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[Cu<sup>+</sup>L<sup>3</sup><sup>-</sup>]<sup>2</sup><sup>-</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.922</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.172</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.322</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.319</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.354</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.65</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Absorbance vs pH graph for Tz-Cu(I) complex in aqueous medium, I = 0.1 mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup> (NaClO<sub>4</sub>), l<sub>max</sub> = 332 nm at various temperature, (1 - 4) [Tz] = 2 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>, [Cu<sup>2+</sup>] = 6 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup> at 293, 303, 313, and 323 K respectively; (5) [Tz] = [Cu<sup>2+</sup>] = 2 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup> at 313 K. (b) Van’t Hoff plot of log K<sub>1</sub> of Tz-Cu(I) complex against 1/T.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label>(b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x18.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x19.png"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Optimization of Variables</title><sec id="s3_5_1"><title>3.5.1. Complexation Method</title><p>In order to optimize the condition we have investigated a number of parameters such as pH, reagent concentration, the temperature and time.</p><p>Effect of pH</p><p>With other conditions fixed the effect of pH on absorbance of Cu(I)-Tz complex at l<sub>max</sub> = 332 nm was investigated from pH 3.5 - 10.0. From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a), the quantitative determination of Tz was achieved at pH = 5.9.</p><p>In order to determine the best buffer solution at pH = 5.9, several buffer systems at isomolar concentration of 0.2 mol・L<sup>−1</sup> were studied. The best analytical sensitivity was obtained in presence of acetate-acetic acid buffer. Next, the effect of buffer volume on analytical sensitivity was also studied in the range of 0.2 - 2.5 ml, and the maximum absorbance was obtained at a buffer volume of 0.5 ml. the results are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a).</p><p>Effect of Copper Concentration</p><p>The effect of copper(II) concentration on the absorbance of the complex was investigated by varying the reagent concentration under the optimum conditions ([Tz] = 2 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> mol・L<sup>−1</sup>), pH = 5.9, T = 293 K. It is clear from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a) that the maximum absorbance was attained with 3.0 ml; above this volume, the absorbance remained unchanged. To ensure the complete complexation for determination of tartrazine, 4.0 ml Cu(II) was used.</p><p>Effect of Temperature and Time</p><p>The effect of temperature on the absorbance of the formed complex was studied in aqueous medium at pH = 5.9 in the range 393 - 323 K, keeping constant concentration of Tz (2.0 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> mol・L<sup>−1</sup>) and copper (8.0 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> mol・L<sup>−1</sup>). The maximum absorbance was obtained at 303 K (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)). Under optimum conditions, the reaction time was determined by following the absorbance of the complex at different time intervals. Complete complex formation was attained after 5 min. at 303 K.</p><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Reaction conditions for complexation reaction at 293 K, [Tz] = 2 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>, l<sub>max</sub> = 332 nm, pH = 5.9. (1) Effect of different volumes of 2 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>3</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup> Cu<sup>2+</sup> on absorbance of Cu<sup>+</sup>-Tz<sup>3</sup><sup>-</sup> complex, acetate buffer volume = 1 ml. (2) Effect of different acetate buffer volume on absorbance of Cu-Tz complex, [Cu<sup>2+</sup>] = 8 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>. (b) Effect of absolute temperature on absorbance of Tz complex, [Tz] = 2 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>, [Cu<sup>2+</sup>] = 8 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>; buffer volume = 0.5 ml. (c) Reaction conditions for oxidation reaction of Tz with alkaline KMnO<sub>4</sub> at 293 K, [Tz = 1 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>]. 1) Effect of KMnO<sub>4</sub> (1 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>2</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>) (by volume), [NaOH] = 0.4 mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>, t = 60 min. 2) Effect of NaOH (1.0 mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>) (by volume), [KMnO<sub>4</sub>] = 2 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>3</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>, t = 60 min.</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x21.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x20.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x22.png"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s3_5_2"><title>3.5.2. KMnO<sub>4</sub> Oxidation Method</title><p>Redox reactions have been used as the basis for the development of simple and sensitive spectrophotometric methods for the determination of many compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref40">40</xref>] . Tartrazine reacts with KMnO<sub>4</sub> in strongly alkaline medium producing green manganate (l<sub>max</sub> = 610 nm) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)). During the current study the produced colour intensity increased gradually with time to reach maximum after 60 min and was stable for at least 24 h. The factors affecting the formation of manganate ions were further studied and optimized.</p><p>Effect of NaOH and KMnO<sub>4</sub></p><p>The dependence of redox reaction on the volume of NaOH (1.0 mol・L<sup>−1</sup>) was investigated in the range 1.0 - 5.0 ml. The results show that maximum absorbance was obtained using 4.0 ml of 1.0 mol・L<sup>−1</sup> NaOH with no significant changes indicated as the volume was increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)). Under optimum conditions, the dependence of redox reaction on the volume of KMnO<sub>4</sub> was investigated over the range from 0.5 - 3.0 ml (1 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup> mol・L<sup>−1</sup>). The results show that the maximum absorbance was obtained using 2.0 ml of 1 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup> mol・L<sup>−1</sup> KMnO<sub>4</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5_3"><title>3.5.3. Stoichiometry of Tartrazine Reactions</title><p>The stoichiometryt of tartrazine reaction with Cu(II) or KMnO<sub>4</sub> was established by the continuous variation method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref41">41</xref>] . The solutions having C<sub>o</sub> = C<sub>R</sub> + C<sub>Tz</sub> = 6.0 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> mol・L<sup>−1</sup> at pH 5.9 or &gt; 11.0. The plot of absorbance versus mole fraction of reagent at l<sub>max</sub> 332 or 610 nm, reveals the formation of 1:1 (Tz:copper) complex and 1:2 (Tz:KMnO<sub>4</sub>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Quantification</title><sec id="s3_6_1"><title>3.6.1. Validation of the Proposed Methods</title><p>For our two methods (I, II) the ranges of linearity of absorbance as a function of food additive Tz concentration provide a satisfactory measure of the sensitivity of the method. Under the optimum conditions the absorbance of the complex (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) or manganate obeys Beer’s law in Tz concentration range of 10.69 - 85.50 or 5.34 - 34.12 &#181;g・ml<sup>−1</sup> respectively. For the two proposed methods (I, II), the molar absorptivity and Sandell sensitivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref42">42</xref>] values are 0.361 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>, 0.80 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> L・mol<sup>−1</sup>・cm<sup>−1</sup> and 0.1480, 0.0668 &#181;g・cm<sup>−2</sup> respectively. The regression equations, correlation coefficient, limit of detection, and limit of quantification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref43">43</xref>] were also calculated and summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6_2"><title>3.6.2. Accuracy and Precision</title><p>The accuracy and precision of the proposed spectrophotometric methods were determined at three different concentration levels of additive food colour-Tz by analyzing five replicate samples of each concentration. The relative standard deviation (R.S.D%) obtained for the analytical results did not exceed 2% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) which proved a high reproducibility of the results and precision of the methods.</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Absorption spectra of tartrazine-copper complex, pH = 5.9 (acetate buffer), tartrazine concentration range 2 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>5</sup> (1) to 2.0 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup> (9) with regular successive additions in presence of 8.0 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4</sup> mol・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>Cu(II) at 303 K</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x23.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of optical and regression characteristic of the proposed methods for determination of tartrazine</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Method/reagent Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Copper(II)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >KMnO<sub>4</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colourless</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Green</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >l<sub>max</sub> (nm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >332</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >610</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beer’s law limits (&#181;g・ml<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.69 - 85.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.34 - 34.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ringborn limts (&#181;g・ml<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.59 - 81.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.08 - 31.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Molar absorptivity (L・mol<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>・cm<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.361 &#215; 10<sup>4 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80 &#215; 10<sup>4 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sandel’s sensitivity (&#181;g・cm<sup>-</sup><sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1480</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0668</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Regression equation A = a + bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A = 6.55 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>3</sup>C − 8.62 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A = 0.0147C + 6.79 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>3 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slope (b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.55 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>3 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0147<sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intercept (a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.62 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>4 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.79 &#215; 10<sup>-</sup><sup>3 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation coefficient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9969</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limit of detection (LOD) (&#181;g・ml<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.355</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limit of quantification (LOQ) (&#181;g・ml<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.075</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of accuracy and precision of the proposed methods for determination of tartrazine in pure form</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Method/Reagent</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Amount &#181;g・ml<sup>-</sup><sup>1 </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >RSD %</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Recovery %</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >C.L<sup>b</sup><sup> </sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Taken</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Found &#177; SD<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(II) Intraday assay</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.062 53.437 64.124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.929 &#177; 0.11 51.777 &#177; 0.13 63.532 &#177; 0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34 0.25 0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.585 96.894 99.076</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.137 &#177;0.162 &#177;0.249</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intreday assay</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.062 53.437 64.124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.166 &#177; 0.12 52.54 &#177; 0.15 63.838 &#177; 0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39 0.29 0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.205 98.321 99.554</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.149 &#177;0.186 &#177;0.236</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KMnO<sub>4</sub> Intraday</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.031 26.719 32.062</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.001 &#177; 0.05 26.205 &#177; 0.07 32.395 &#177; 0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31 0.27 0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.813 98.076 101.039</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;0.062 &#177;0.087 &#177;0.137</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>a) Mean for 5 independed analysis. b) C.L., confidence limit at 95% confidence level at 4 degree of freedom (t = 2.776).</p></sec><sec id="s3_6_3"><title>3.6.3. Intraday and Interday Precision and Accuracy</title><p>Under optimum conditions the intraday precision was carried out for our procedures through replicate analysis (n = 5) for Tz corresponding to 32.062, 53.437, 64.124 &#181;g・ml<sup>−1</sup> (method I) and 16.031, 26.719, 32.062 &#181;g・ml<sup>−1</sup> (method II). The interday precision was also evaluated through replicate analysis of the standard Tz for three consecutive days at the same concentration levels as in within day precision. The results of these assays are reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. For intraday and interday precision, the recovery and RSD values were in the range of 96.89% - 101.04% and 0.25% to 0.39% respectively. The green manganate ions produced from Tz-KMnO<sub>4</sub> reaction in alkaline medium was stable only for 24 hours.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6_4"><title>3.6.4. Analytical Recovery and Matrix Effects</title><p>To investigate the selectivity of the proposed methods, the effect of various substances on the determination of Tz (53.437 and 26.719 mg・L<sup>−1</sup>) for method I and II respectively was tested under optimum conditions. Several representative potential interferences such as inorganic cations, anions, molecular species and dyes were investigated individually for their effect on Tz recovery. Tolerance limits were defined by the concentration of interferents which caused on &lt;5% error in the determination of Tz. The obtained mean recoveries and standard deviation ranged between 99.0% - 96.0% and &#177; 1.0 - 2.0 respectively are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. These results proved the accuracy of the proposed methods and absence of interference from common matrix. The accuracy of our method was also checked by studying the influence of various dyes on the recovery of Tz. Tartrazine determination</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Matrix effects on the recovery of tartrazine (E = 102)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Matrix components</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Complexation method</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Oxidation method</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Concentration mg・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recovery %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Concentration mg・L<sup>-</sup><sup>1 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recovery %</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1) Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Cl<sup>-</sup>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1710045x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.0 &#177; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.0 &#177; 1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2) Citrate, stearat, fumarate, aspartame, gelatin, sugar, L-ascopric acid.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.0 &#177; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.5 &#177; 1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3) Sunset yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.5 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.0 &#177; 1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4) Tropaeolin ooo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.5 &#177; 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.0 &#177; 2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5) Allura red Ac</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.0 &#177; 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.8 &#177; 1.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Statistical analysis of results obtained by the complexation method for tartrazine in powdered drink samples</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Drink<sup>a</sup> sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Present &#181;g・ml<sup>-</sup><sup>1 </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Added &#181;g・ml<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Found &#181;g・ml<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >&#177;RSD %</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Recovery %</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >t-value<sup>b</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >F-value<sup>b</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Reported method<sup>(41)</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recovery %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;RSD %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recovery %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;RSD %</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.741</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.690 21.375 32.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.893 24.578 35.800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68 0.69 0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.48 97.86 100.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.603</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.690 21.375 32.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.756 23.510 33.130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55 0.62 0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.632 102.320 98.390</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tamarind</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.690 21.375 42.760</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.825 22.440 34.199</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60 0.63 0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.97 95.44 99.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>a) From local markets of Assiut city, Egypt. b) Theoretical t-value (u = 4) and F-value (u = 4.4) at 95% confidence level are 2.78 and 6.39.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Statistical analysis of results obtained by the complexation method for tartrazine in powdered gelatin</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Gelatin<sup>a</sup> sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Present &#181;g・ml<sup>-</sup><sup>1 </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Added &#181;g・ml<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Found &#181;g・ml<sup>-</sup><sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >&#177;RSD %</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Recovery %</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >t-value<sup>b</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >F-value<sup>b</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Reported method<sup>(21)</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recovery %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;RSD %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recovery %</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;RSD %</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lemon</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.690 21.375 32.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.82 22.44 33.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54 0.62 0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.92 95.44 96.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apricot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.690 21.375 32.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.820 23.512 35.270</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66 0.72 0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.25 95.57 99.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Banana</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.690 21.375 32.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.820 22.440 34.199</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59 0.70 0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.94 95.45 99.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pineapple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.690 21.375 32.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.894 23.512 34.199</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66 0.69 0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.95 95.66 96.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Green apple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.068</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.690 21.375 32.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.75 21.37 32.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67 0.69 0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.93 95.23 96.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peach</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.068</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.690 21.375 32.070</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.687 22.440 33.130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66 0.69 0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.89 99.98 99.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>a) From local markets of Assiut city, Egypt. b) Theoretical t-value (u = 4) and F-value (u = 4.4) at 95% confidence level are 2.78 and 6.39.</p><p>was possible in presence of 0.045 mg/10 ml sunset yellow (0.035 mg in case of method II), 0.05 mg Allura red (0.04 mg in case of method II) and 0.061 mg Tropaeolin 000 (0.045 mg in case of method II). This was attributed to the great sensitivity of the methods that necessitated dilution for the food sample and consequently the matrix beyond their interference capability.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Applications</title><p>The complexation method was successfully applied to the determination of Tz in two different commercial food products (powered drink and powdered gelatin samples). To investigate the applicability of the proposed method, recovery experiments were performed using multiple points standard addition method. For this purpose, a known amount of Tz was spiked to the formulated preparations and the total amount of the dye was estimated. The results are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>. The t- and F-tests indicated no significant differences between the calculated and theoretical values of both the proposed and the reported methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66081-ref44">44</xref>] at 95% confidence level, which indicate good precision and accuracy in the analysis of investigated Tz in commercial food products.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In this paper, two spectrophotometric methods for the determination of Tz with Cu(II) and KMnO<sub>4</sub> were proposed and successfully validated. The methods were based on the redox reaction with Cu(II) followed by complex formation and oxidation with strongly alkaline KMnO<sub>4</sub>. The positive value of change in enthalpy (DH) for complexation reaction suggested that the reaction was endothermic favourable at high temperature. The negative value of free energy change indicated that copper-Tz redox reaction, dissociation of the ligand and complexation process were spontaneous. It was found that the complexation method was selective and sensitive enough to enable the determination of lower amounts of Tz and could be applied to the food quality control.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Magda M. S. Saleh,Elham Y. Hashem,Najat O. A. Al- Salahi, (2016) Oxidation and Complexation-Based Spectrophotometric Methods for Sensitive Determination of Tartrazine E102 in Some Commercial Food Samples. Computational Chemistry,04,51-64. doi: 10.4236/cc.2016.42005</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.66081-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Argetino, C.A. (2010) Chapter XII. http://www.anmat.gov.ar/alimentos/codigea/CAPITULO_II.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FDA (2007) Summary of Color Additives for Use in United States in Foods, Drugs, Cosmetics and Medical Devices. FDA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tanaka, T. (2006) Reproductive and Neurobehavioural Toxicity Study of Tartrazine Administered to Mice in the Diet. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 44, 179-187.? &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2005.06.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Michel, O., Naeije, N., Bracamonte, M., Duchateau, J. and Sergysels, R. (1984) Decreased Sensitivity to Tartrazine after Aspirin Desensitization in an Asthmatic Patient Intolerant to Both Aspirin and Tartrazine. Annals of Allergy, 52, 368-370.? </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moutinho, I.L.D., Bertges, L.C. and Assis, R.V.C. (2007) Prolonged Use of the Food Dye Tartrazine (FD&amp;C Yellow n? 5) and Its Effects on the Gastric Mucosa of Wistar Rats. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 67, 141-145.?  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842007000100019 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Degs, Y.S. (2009) Determination of Three Dyes in Commercial Soft Drinks Using HLA/GO and Liquid Chromatography. Food Chemistry, 117, 485-490.? &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.097</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alves, S.P., Brum, D.M., de Andrade, é.C.B. and Netto, A.D.P. (2008) Determination of Synthetic Dyes in Selected Foodstuffs by High Performance Liquid Chromatography with UV-DAD Detection. Food Chemistry, 107, 489-496.?  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.07.054 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garc?a-Falcón, M.S. and Simal-Gandara, J. (2005) Determination of Food Dyes in Soft Drinks Containing Natural Pigments by Liquid Chromatography with Minimal Clean-Up. Food Control, 16, 293-297.?  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.03.009 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Husain, A., Sawaya, W., Al-Omair, A., Al-Zenki, S., Al-Amiri, H., Ahmed, N. and Al-Sinan, M. (2006) Estimates of Dietary Exposure of Children to Artificial Food Colours in Kuwait. Food Additives and Contaminants, 23, 245-251.?  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02652030500429125 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, M., Luo, X., Chen, B., Su, S. and Yao, S. (2006) Simultaneous Determination of Water-Soluble and Fat-Soluble Synthetic Colorants in Foodstuff by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Diode Array Detection-Electrospray Mass Spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 1103, 170-176.? http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2005.11.061 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Minioti, K.S., Sakellariou, C.F. and Thomaidis, N.S. (2007) Determination of 13 Synthetic Food Colorants in Water- Soluble Foods by Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Diode-Array Detector. Analytica Chimica Acta, 583, 103-110. &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2006.10.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poul, M., Jarry, G., Elhkim, M.O. and Poul, J.M. (2009) Lack of Genotoxic Effect of Food Dyes Amaranth, Sunset Yellow and Tartrazine and Their Metabolites in the Gut Micronucleus Assay in Mice. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 47, 443-448.? http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.11.034 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghoreishi, S.M., Behpour, M. and Golestaneh, M. (2012) Simultaneous Determination of Sunset Yellow and Tartrazine in Soft Drinks Using Gold Nanoparticles Carbon Paste Electrode. Food Chemistry, 132, 637-641.?  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.103 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">KAPOR, M.A., Yamanaka, H., Carneiro, P.A. and Zanoni, M.V.B. (2001) Electroanalysis of Food Dyes: Determination of Indigo-Carmine and Tartrazine. Eclética Química, 26, 53-68.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, M.L.S., Garcia, M.B.Q., Lima, J.L. and Barrado, E. (2007) Voltammetric Determination of Food Colorants Using a Polyallylamine Modified Tubular Electrode in a Multicommutated Flow System. Talanta, 72, 282-288.?  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2006.10.032 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">López-de-Alba, P.L., Michelini-Rodriguez, L.I., Wróbel, K. and Amador-Hernández, J. (1997) Extraction of Sunset Yellow and Tartrazine by Ion-Pair Formation with Adogen-464 and Their Simultaneous Determination by Bivariate Calibration and Derivative Spectrophotometry. Analyst, 122, 1575-1579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/a702268i.? </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nevado, J.B., Flores, J.R., Cabanillas, C.G., Llerena, M.V. and Salcedo, A.C. (1998) Resolution of Ternary Mixtures of Tartrazine, Sunset Yellow and Ponceau 4R by Derivative Spectrophotometric Ratio Spectrum-Zero Crossing Method in Commercial Foods. Talanta, 46, 933-942.? &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(97)00348-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berzas, J.J., Flores, J.R., Llerena, M.V. and Farinas, N.R. (1999) Spectrophotometric Resolution of Ternary Mixtures of Tartrazine, Patent Blue V and Indigo Carmine in Commercial Products. Analytica Chimica Acta, 391, 353-364.?  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00215-9 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vidotti, E.C., Cancino, J.C., Oliveira, C.C. and Rollemberg, M.D.C.E. (2005) Simultaneous Determination of Food Dyes by First Derivative Spectrophotometry with Sorption onto Polyurethane Foam. Analytical Sciences, 21, 149-153.?  
http://dx.doi.org/10.2116/analsci.21.149 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vidotti, E.C. and Rollemberg, M.D.C.E. (2006) Derivative Spectrophotometry: A Simple Strategy for Simultaneous Determination of Food Dyes. Química Nova, 29, 230-233.? &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422006000200010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Llamas, N.E., Garrido, M., Di Nezio, M.S. and Band, B.S.F. (2009) Second Order Advantage in the Determination of Amaranth, Sunset Yellow FCF and Tartrazine by UV-Vis and Multivariate Curve Resolution-Alternating Least Squares. Analytica Chimica Acta, 655, 38-42.? &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ni, Y., Wang, Y. and Kokot, S. (2009) Simultaneous Kinetic Spectrophotometric Analysis of Five Synthetic Food Colorants with the Aid of Chemometrics. Talanta, 78, 432-441.? &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2008.11.035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schenone, A.V., Culzoni, M.J., Marsili, N.R. and Goicoechea, H.C. (2013) Determination of Tartrazine in Beverage Samples by Stopped-Flow Analysis and Three-Way Multivariate Calibration of Non-Linear Kinetic-Spectrophotome- tric Data. Food chemistry, 138, 1928-1935.? &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.126</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahraei, R., Farmany, A. and Mortazavi, S.S. (2013) A Nanosilver-Based Spectrophotometry Method for Sensitive Determination of Tartrazine in Food Samples. Food chemistry, 138, 1239-1242.?  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.029 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vogel, A.I. (1973) A Text Book of Quantitative Inorganic Analysis. 3rd Edition, Longman, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nair, V.S.K. and Parthasarathy, S. (1971) Studies on Metal Complexes in Aqueous Solution—VII: 4-Nitro and 4-Methyl Phthalates of Some Transition Metals. Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry, 33, 3019-3024.?  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(71)80067-2 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dickerson, R.E., Geis, I. and Benjamin, I.W.A. (1976) Chemistry, Matter and the Universe. California, USA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ives, D.J.G. (1972) Chemical Thermodynamics, University Chemistry, Macdonald Technical and Scientific.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kuban, V. and Havel, J. (1973) Some 2-(2-Thiazolylazo)-4-Methoxyphenol (TAMP) Complex Equilibria, Acid-Base Properties of TAMP in Water and in Various Mixed Solvents. Acta Chemica Scandinavica, 27, 528-540.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.3891/acta.chem.scand.27-0528</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, L.P., Li, Y.F., Huang, C.Z. and Zhang, Q. (2006) Visual Detection of Sudan Dyes Based on the Plasmon Resonance Light Scattering Signals of Silver Nanoparticles. Analytical Chemistry, 7, 5570-5577.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac0603577</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huo, J., Guo, Y., Meng, S., Wang, M. and Wang, Y. (2010) Complex Formation of Sudan I with Cu (II) and Its Identification from Chilli Species. 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (iCBBE), Chengdu, 18-20 June 2010, 1-4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gürkan, R. and Altunay, N. (2013) A Reliable Method of Quantification of Trace Copper in Beverages with and without Alcohol by Spectrophotometry after Cloud Point Extraction. Química Nova, 36, 1146-1154.??  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422013000800012 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassan, E.M. and Belal, F. (2002) Kinetic Spectrophotometric Determination of Nizatidine and Ranitidine in Pharmaceutical Preparations. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 27, 31-38.?  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7085(01)00473-3 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saleh, M.M., Hashem, E.Y., Youssef, A.K. and Abdel-Kader, D.A. (2015) UV-Visible Spectrophotometric Methods for Direct Determination of Sulfasalazine Antibiotic Drug in Its Pharmaceutical Formulations. World Journal of Phar- macy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4, 205-226.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Voznica, P., Havel, J. and Sommer, L. (1980) The Reactions of Gallium, Indium and Thallium with 2-(2-Pyridylazo)- 1-Naphthol-4-Sulphonic Acid and Their Spectrophotometric Determination. Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications, 45, 54-79.? http://dx.doi.org/10.1135/cccc19800054 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Idriss, K.A., Seleim, M.M., Saleh, M.S., Abu-Bakr, M.S. and Sedaira, H. (1988) Spectrophotometric Study of the Complexation Equilibria of Zirconium (IV) with 1-Amino-4-Hydroxyanthraquinone and the Determination of Zirconium. Analyst, 113, 1643-1647.? http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/an9881301643 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Idriss, K.A. and Saleh, M.M. (1993) Acid-Base Characteristics of Naphthazarin and Solution Equilibria of Yttrium (III) Chelates. Analyst, 118, 223-227.? http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/AN9931800223 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, K.K., Kaur, T. and Dadhich, E. (2013) Polarographic Study of Mixed Ligand Complexes of Pb(II) and Tl(I) with Thio Disuccinic Acid and Some Amino Acids in Aqueous Medium. Journal of Ultra Chemistry, 9, 249-256.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Sarawy, A.A., El-Bindary, A.A., El-Sonbati, A.Z. and Mokpel, M.M. (2006) Potentiometric and Thermodynamic Studies of Azosulfonamide Drugs. Polish Journal of Chemistry, 80, 289-295.? </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahman, N., Khan, N.A. and Azmi, S.N.H. (2004) Extractive Spectrophotometric Methods for the Determination of Nifedipine in Pharmaceutical Formulations Using Bromocresol Green, Bromophenol Blue, Bromothymol Blue and Eriochrome Black T. Il Farmaco, 59, 47-54.? &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.farmac.2003.10.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Job</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1928</year>)<article-title>Formation and Stability of Inorganic Complexes in Solution</article-title><source> Annali di Chimica</source><volume> 9</volume>,<fpage> 113</fpage>-<lpage>203</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sandell, E.B. (1959) Colorimetric Determination of Traces of Metals.? 3rd Edition, Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Narade, S., Patil, S., Surve, S., Shete, D. and Pore, Y. (2010) Simultaneous UV Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of Diacerein and Aceclofenac in Tablets. Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Research, 2, 137-142.? </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66081-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, R., Jiang, Z.T. and Liu, Y.H. (2008) Direct Solid-Phase Spectrophotometric Determination of Tartrazine in Soft Drinks Using β-Cyclodextrin Polymer as Support. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 16, 91-96.? </mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>