<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2016.75039</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-66053</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Role of Biodiversity in Food Security and Nutrition: A Potato Cultivar Case Study
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>armen</surname><given-names>van Niekerk</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hettie</surname><given-names>Schönfeldt</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nicolette</surname><given-names>Hall</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Beulah</surname><given-names>Pretorius</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department Animal and Wildlife Science, Faculty Natural and Agricultural Science, University of Pretoria,
Pretoria, South Africa</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>04</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>371</fpage><lpage>382</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>22</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>25</month>	<year>April</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Biodiversity is considered a critical measure of the agricultural health of the world. Not only does increased biodiversity contribute to nutrient production and consumption, but it acts as a safeguard against food shortages due to pests and diseases by spreading the risk. Biodiversity can improve dietary diversity in such a way to ultimately contribute to improved food and nutrition security. As a result biodiversity is often highlighted in global discussions related to food and nutrition security. Potatoes (
  Solanum tuberosum L.) are highly biodiverse food crops, with more than 4000 different cultivars grown globally. The crop is sometimes considered as part of the vegetable component of food baskets, but it is mainly added to meals as a starch because potatoes have a high starch content and are thus high in energy. However, significant differences in the nutritional content (including micronutrient composition) of different potato cultivars have been reported in many countries. It is therefore proposed that specific cultivars could potentially contribute more to critical nutrients required in the diet of countries at risk of malnutrition. The nutritional profile (macronutrients and minerals) of 11 potato cultivars cultivated in sub-Saharan Africa was determined and the contribution which these different potatoes could make to the diet, and consequently to food and nutrition security, is discussed. The results showed that significant differences are found in the nutritional content between the different cultivars. Significant differences (p &lt; 0.001) were found in macronutrients such as protein and fat as well as micronutrients such as copper, phosphorus and potassium. These results indicate the potentially beneficial role which a biodiverse range of crops such as potatoes, could play in the food and nutrition security of developing countries.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Potatoes</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Solanum tuberosum&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Nutrient Content</kwd><kwd> Biodiversity</kwd><kwd> Sub-Saharan</kwd><kwd> Food and Nutrition Security</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Food, as well as the lack thereof, has a significant impact on human health, therefore food and nutrition security, dietary adequacy and biodiversity are currently amongst the most vigorously discussed global topics in the field of nutrition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref2">2</xref>] . Even though these topics have been main focus areas in the field of nutrition for many years, resulting in slow to moderate changes in the nutrition status of populations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref3">3</xref>] , little progress is observed in sub-Saharan countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref4">4</xref>] . The Millennium Development Goal, 1C related to halving under nutrition in developing countries was not reached in 2015, particularly not so in sub-Saharan Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref6">6</xref>] . This slow progress is often blamed on population growth, poor agricultural conditions and environmental changes, etc., which place strain on food production and food security [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Individuals who are food secure and have the ability to acquire adequate food for a healthy and active life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref7">7</xref>] , are more likely to be able to contribute significantly to the economy than their undernourished counterparts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref8">8</xref>] . Globally food programmes are being implemented to fight food and nutrition insecurity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref9">9</xref>] . Even though these programmes lead to a decrease in food insecurity, very little change is observed in nutrition security, while a drastic increase in obesity rates tends to occur [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref11">11</xref>] . These programmes are mainly focused on supplying food insecure individuals with energy dense food to combat food insecurity rather than nutrient dense foods to achieve both food and nutrition security [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref12">12</xref>] . Staple foods in Third World Countries include fortified bread and maize products that do not supply individuals with all the nutrients necessary for good health. Furthermore these diets are supplemented by increased consumption of high fat foods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref13">13</xref>] . This monotonous consumption of staple foods and fat is leading to stunting in young children and under nutrition (lack of certain essential nutrients) in adults [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>The main cause of stunting is under nutrition, which (despite various interventions) is increasing in sub- Saharan Africa. In the age group 0 - 3 years 26.9% of boys and 25.9% of girls were stunted in 2012 as opposed to 19% of boys and 16% of girls in 2008 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref11">11</xref>] . Sub-Saharan countries are faced with hidden hunger (micronutrient deficiency), which is seen in children and adults. These individuals suffer from micronutrient deficiencies most commonly due to a lack of fruit and vegetables in their diets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref16">16</xref>] . Eighteen out of 20 top countries that suffer from hidden hunger, are in sub-Saharan Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>These countries are also faced with the growing occurrence of overweight and obesity. According to the South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (SANHANES) 24.8% of females are overweight and 39.2% are obese. It was reported that 20.2% of males and 68.2% of females were at risk of metabolic complications due to their weight [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref18">18</xref>] . These figures are high when compared to other developing countries. Brazil has lower obesity rates, only 12.5% of males and 16.9% of females are obese [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>Promoting agricultural diversity can lead to dietary diversity through increased consumption of different cultivars of fruits and vegetables [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref20">20</xref>] . The United Nations (UN) together with the International Institute for Sustainable Development listed biodiversity as one of the most important aspects of food and nutrition security because it has the potential to decrease the occurrence of micronutrient deficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref25">25</xref>] .</p><sec id="s1_1"><title>1.1. Potatoes in South Africa</title><p>South Africa is classified as a country with high biodiversity levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref21">21</xref>] . Potatoes are one of the crops that contribute to this high biodiversity score with more than 80 registered cultivars. These tubers are grown in 16 production regions in the country [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref22">22</xref>] . Due to the biodiversity of these tubers, they can be grown in a variety of agronomical conditions by commercial and subsistence farmers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref23">23</xref>] . Because these tubers are nutrient dense carbohydrate, they can form part of an affordable balanced diet along with other starches such as bread and maize meal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref24">24</xref>] . The tubers are cheaper than cereals and provide more nutrients per monetary unit than any other carbohydrate crop, thus making them a noteworthy contributor to food and nutrition security [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref26">26</xref>] . Furthermore they fit into the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) goals of promoting crops that are locally available and that are adapted to cultivation practices of the countries in question [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref25">25</xref>] .</p><p>Even though there are so many cultivars available, the nutritional value of only one cultivar is recorded in the South African Food Composition Tables. In 2000, a South African cultivated cultivar, known as BP1, was the market leader with a 43% market share. Although not recorded, it is generally accepted that it was this cultivar that was analysed for nutrient content in 1999 and included in the national food composition database. At that time the Department of Health commissioned analyses of fruit and vegetables and all samples were purchased from the fresh fruit and vegetable market in Johannesburg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref27">27</xref>] . It is therefore probable that BP1 values were used in the South Africa Food Composition Tables.</p><p>Over the last decade the market share held by different cultivars has changed drastically as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. New cultivars that are higher yielding, disease resistant and suited for specific agronomical conditions are constantly being developed. When farmers start using these new cultivars, changes in production patterns occur [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref28">28</xref>] which lead to changes in consumption. By 2012, BP1 only comprised 1% of the market, while Mondial was the market leader with a market share of 63% compared to 2000 when it only had an 8% market share [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref29">29</xref>] . These changes seen in consumption of different cultivars motivate the need for the nutritional analysis of different cultivars.</p></sec><sec id="s1_2"><title>1.2. Objective</title><p>The objective of this case study was to explore the reported differences between the nutrient values of different potato cultivars to determine the contribution which these different cultivars could make to food and nutrition security.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sampling and Sample Preparation</title><p>The cultivars with the largest market share, as well as those with the greatest potential for growth, as identified by Potatoes South Africa, were chosen for the study. The cultivars included Mondial, Fabula, Buffelspoort (BP13), BP1, Van der Plank, Fianna, Valor, Sifra, Up-To-Date, Darius, Avalanche. See <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> for a description of the eleven cultivars included in the study.</p><p>Seed potatoes of each cultivar included in the study were provided by Potatoes South Africa. The potatoes were planted on a commercial potato farm in Reitz situated in the Eastern Free State Province, the largest potato production area in South Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref22">22</xref>] . These tubers were grown under controlled dry land conditions during the summer of 2012/2013 according to normal commercial potato agronomy practices. All the tubers were planted on the same plot of land with the same watering, sunshine, fertilizer and treatment applications. The potatoes were harvested on the 11<sup>th</sup> of April 2013. After the harvest, the tubers of each cultivar were randomly selected and packed into two brown 10kg bags and transported on the following day to the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) at Irene, Pretoria. The potatoes were kept in a cool dark room at 20˚C for 7 days to mimic market conditions. After storage, five average sized tubers from each cultivar were randomly selected. These tubers were thoroughly washed with distilled water to remove excess dirt and dried on absorbent paper at room temperature. The tubers were sliced in half perpendicular to the core as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. One half was peeled and the skin on the other half was not removed, this was done separately. Samples were individually grated, sealed in ziplock plastic-bags and sent to the laboratory for freeze-drying. Freeze-dried samples were stored at 20˚C. Freeze- drying the grated tubers ensured that the dried product retained its nutritional value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref31">31</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Change in market share of potato cultivars from 2000 to 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref29">29</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cultivar</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2000</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2009</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2012</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BP1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Up-to-date</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Buffelspoort</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mondial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Van der Plank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sifra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Other includes all other cultivars cultivated in South Africa.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Description of the eleven potato cultivars identified for sampling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref30">30</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cultivar</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shape</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Colour of the skin and flesh</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Classification system</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cooking characteristics</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mondial</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oval</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >White</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waxy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >An ideal boiling potato as it does not slough.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fabula</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oval</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Light yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waxy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Suited for boiling and baking.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Buffelspoort</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Round-Oval</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >White</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waxy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ideal for boiling as it retains its shape.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BP1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flat Oval</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >White</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waxy/Floury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Combination potatoes lend themselves to a variety of cooking techniques, especially boiling and roasting.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Van der Plank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oval-Pear</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >White</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waxy/Floury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Can be prepared using a variety of cooking techniques. Best suited for boiling and frying.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fianna</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oval</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Light yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waxy/Floury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Can be used in the processing industry as it is firm with a fluffy mouthfeel.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Valor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oval</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cream white</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waxy/Floury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ideal roasting potatoes as they keep their form and have a fluffy mouthfeel.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sifra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Round</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >White</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waxy/Floury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >An all-round potato that is ideally suited for most cooking techniques.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Up-To-Date (UTD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flat Oval</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cream white</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Floury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Floury texture, makes this potato ideal for mash.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Darius</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oval</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >White</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Floury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Floury texture but keeps its shape when cooked.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Avalanche</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oval</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >White</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Floury</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good for roasting, frying and mash with a fluffy texture.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Potato tuber sliced perpendicular to the core (FAO, 1998)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2701745x6.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Analysis</title><p>The nutritional analyses were performed on a double-blind basis at NutriLab, University of Pretoria, South Africa. A composite sample consisting of 5 randomly selected raw tubers was used for evaluation with and without skin. Samples were analysed in duplicate according to the methods summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. To ensure accuracy of the assays, standard reference samples were included in all batches of samples analysed. The laboratory is certified by the Agri-Laboratory Association of Southern Africa (AgriLASA) as a laboratory participating in their quality control programmes.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Analyses</title><p>Data received from the laboratory was arranged in tabular format and statistically analysed using the GenStat for Windows (2008) statistical computer programme [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref35">35</xref>] . A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was applied with Fisher’s protected t-test least significant difference at the 5% level of significance among cultivar means. The mean nutritional values of the “flesh only potatoes” was statistically compared to the nutritional value of the “flesh and skin potatoes” at a 1% level of significance.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Analytical methods used for nutrient analysis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Analysis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Method</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture (water)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AOAC, 2000. Official method of analysis 934.01<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AOAC, 2000. Official method of analysis 942.05<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein (N)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AOAC, 2000. Official method of analysis 968.06<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AOAC, 2000. Official method of analysis 920.39<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy (calculated)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Greenfield, H. and Southgate, D.A.T., 2003<sup>#</sup><sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbohydrates (calculated)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Greenfield, H. and Southgate, D.A.T., 2003<sup>#</sup><sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Available carbohydrates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Available carbohydrates = Dry Matter ? Protein ? Fat ? Ash ? NDF (neutral detergent fibre) (Ferreira, 2014)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Starch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Enzymatic spectrophotometer (In-house method)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minerals</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AOAC, 2000. Official method of analysis 935.13<sup>*</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref32">32</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref33">33</xref>] ; <sup>#</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref34">34</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Contribution to Nutrient Reference Values Made by Potatoes</title><p>In sub-Saharan countries maize and wheat are common staple crops, but they need further processing to produce staple foods (maize meal porridge and brown bread) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref36">36</xref>] . Both of these products are fortified. Contrary to this, potatoes are a crop that grow easily. It can be grown by subsistence farmers and requires very little to no further processing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref37">37</xref>] . Potatoes can be classified as a nutrient dense carbohydrate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref38">38</xref>] , which together with other staples can improve dietary diversity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref39">39</xref>] .</p><p>It has been proposed that potatoes are most commonly consumed without the skin. Therefore it was necessary to identify whether there is a significant difference in the nutritional values of tubers with or without skin.</p><p>Potatoes contain a variety of minerals that are required in the human diet. Tubers contain large amounts of carbohydrate, they do not contribute significantly to protein intake and are naturally low in fat. Very few significant differences in the nutritional value of the tubers with and without the skin were observed. Significant differences were observed in the minerals; calcium (p = 0.009), iron (p ≤ 0.001) and manganese (p ≤ 0.001). Higher levels of calcium and iron were found in potato samples consisting of flesh and skin, while manganese values were higher in tubers without the skin, indicating that manganese storage occurs in the flesh (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Values for phosphorus, magnesium, copper, zinc, potassium and sodium did not differ significantly between tubers with and without the skin. Even though there are only a few minerals that differ significantly in mineral concentration of tubers with and without the skin, the skin plays a cardinal role in preventing nutrients from being leached out during the cooking process.</p><p>In the rest of this paper only the nutritional values of tubers without the skin (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>), will be presented. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> is also included to illustrate the nutritional values of tubers with the skin however only calcium, iron and manganese differed significantly from the nutritional value of tubers without the skin.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Nutritional Analysis of Potato Tubers (Flesh Only) from Eleven Cultivars</title><p>The energy content of potatoes is almost entirely derived from the carbohydrate content as 95% of total energy typically comes from the carbohydrates present within the tuber. This makes potatoes a nutrient dense source of energy that contains easily digestible carbohydrates which is essential for human existence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref41">41</xref>] . As expected these carbohydrates are almost entirely made up of starch. The average carbohydrate content of the cultivars included in the study was 16.8 g/100g with an average starch content of 15.2 g/100g (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). A similar study conducted in Latvia found the average starch content of local Latvian potatoes to be 18.72 g/100g [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref42">42</xref>] . Energy and carbohydrate values had a high correlation (r = 0.9938). In the current study, the Darius cultivar had the highest energy (380 kJ/100g) and the highest carbohydrate contents (18.6 g/100g) and Van der Plank the lowest energy (240 kJ/100g) and second lowest carbohydrate content (13.7 g/100g) after Fianna (21.8 g/100g). Energy</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> The average nutrient content of eleven different potato cultivars, per 100 g raw potato (flesh and skin) and skin only</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nutrient</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p ? value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Flesh only</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% of NRV<sup>*</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Flesh and skin</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% of NRV<sup>*</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy (calculated)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.513</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >282<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >290<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.673</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.425</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0177<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0239<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.145</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Available carbohydrates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.472</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.2<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.82<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.371</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.857</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.3<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.8<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.968</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.9<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.089</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.107<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0945<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.742<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Manganese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zinc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.653</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.371<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.362<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potassium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.515</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >439<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >453<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sodium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.693</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.01<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.16<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.408</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>NRV for individuals 4 years and older [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref40">40</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Nutrient content per 100 g of raw potato, flesh only</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nutrient (flesh only)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Units</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >VDP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >UTD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sifra</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Valor</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BP1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mondial</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Avalanche</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Buffelspoort (BP13)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Darius</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fabula</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fianna</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy (calculated)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >kJ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >253<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >256<sup>abc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >251<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >251<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >276<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >269<sup>bcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >287<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >380<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >349<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Starch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.9<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9<sup>abc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0<sup>abcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7<sup>cde</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.4<sup>bcde</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.2<sup>de</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.1<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.8<sup>f</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbohydrates (calculated)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.7<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6<sup>fe</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.0<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.5<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.3<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3<sup>i</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9<sup>h</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.8j</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Available carbohydrates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.4<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2<sup>fe</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.2<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.7<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6<sup>fe</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.8<sup>h</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.6<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3<sup>i</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.883<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.39<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.69<sup>h</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75<sup>i</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00929<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0322<sup>h </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0211<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0313<sup>g </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0209<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0228<sup>f </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0205<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0353<sup>i </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.09<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.76<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.88<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.32<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.69<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.43<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.25<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.77<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.57<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.5<sup>fg</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.1<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.2<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.7<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.9<sup>efg</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.5<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.7<sup>ef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.3<sup>i</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.6<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.6<sup>h</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Manganese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.70<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.0<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.8<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.2<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.9<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.1<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.7<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.8<sup>de</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.8<sup>f</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.618<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.624<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.736<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.685<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.787<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.728<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.619<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.797<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.942<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.756<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.869<sup>de</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zinc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.317<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.322<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.254<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.376<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.377<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.343<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.473<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.437<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.344<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.377<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.465<sup>f</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0882<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0879<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.075<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.094<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.144<sup>h</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.119<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.102<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.139<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0894<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.105<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.128<sup>f</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potassium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >420<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >401<sup>abc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >416<sup>bcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >440<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >475<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >427<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >434<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >383<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >537<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >370<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >527<sup>f</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sodium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.39<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.59<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.45<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.73<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.38<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.77<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.65<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.45<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.69<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.35<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.69<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>(Note: Means with different superscripts in a row differ significantly).</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Nutrient content per 100 g of raw potato, flesh and skin</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nutrient flesh and skin</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Units</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >VDP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >UTD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sifra</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Valor</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BP1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mondial</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Avalanche</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Buffelspoort (BP13)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Darius</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fabula</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fianna</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy (calculated)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >kJ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >277<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >309<sup>de </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >271<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >257<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >349<sup>f </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >274<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >306<sup>de </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >319<sup>e </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >298<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >305<sup>de </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Starch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.8<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.0<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.6<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.1<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.2<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.9<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7<sup>f</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbohydrates (calculated)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.1<sup>h</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.6<sup>i</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.6<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.4<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.7<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.0<sup>j</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.5<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.4<sup>g</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Available carbohydrates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.1<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.8<sup>de</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.8<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.8<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.5<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.6<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.1<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.9<sup>de</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35<sup>e </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96<sup>h </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45<sup>f </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.65<sup>g </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47<sup>f </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05<sup>b </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10<sup>f </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.059<sup>e </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.030<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.050<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001<sup>a </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.48<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.49<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.35<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.77<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.51<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.86<sup>i</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.57<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.91<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.84<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.01<sup>h</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.23<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.2<sup>ef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.3<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.7<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.4<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.9<sup>h</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.8<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.9<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.3<sup>ef</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.9<sup>i</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.3<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.7<sup>f</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Manganese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.976<sup>cd </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29<sup>f </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.756<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.976<sup>cd </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.48<sup>g </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31<sup>f </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.866<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25<sup>f </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03<sup>de </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08<sup>e </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.917<sup>bc </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.7<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.4<sup>bc </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.1<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.8<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.5<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.5<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7<sup>ab </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.2<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.5<sup>e </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.2<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.4<sup>bc </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.865<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35<sup>e </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44<sup>f </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.788<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.885<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38<sup>ef </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41<sup>ef </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10<sup>c </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zinc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.282<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.419<sup>g </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.249<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.344<sup>cd </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.491<sup>h </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.327<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.370<sup>de </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.415<sup>fg </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.367<sup>de </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.389<sup>ef </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.331<sup>c </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0795<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0999<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0697<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0765<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.147<sup>f </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.102<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0689<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.127<sup>e </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0899<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0986<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0796<sup>b </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potassium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >406<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >545<sup>f </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >349<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >366<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >497<sup>e </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >410<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >412<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >433<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >618<sup>g </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >462<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >477<sup>d </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sodium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.77<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.79<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.04<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.77<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.85<sup>c </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.11<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.81<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.22<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9<sup>d </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.30<sup>b </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.08<sup>a </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.4<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.4<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.3<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.4<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.9<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.2<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.9<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3<sup> </sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>(Note: Means with different superscripts in a row differ significantly).</p><p>was calculated using the Atwater conversion factor for protein, carbohydrates and fat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref34">34</xref>] . Carbohydrate content is higher in the skin which leads to a higher energy value of tubers with the skin as seen between cultivars in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>.</p><p>Starch content did not differ significantly between Van der Plank, UTD, Sifra, Valor and BP1. Darius had the highest starch content of 21.1 g/100g. Starch is linked to cooking and processing qualities in the chipping industry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref43">43</xref>] .</p><p>Although the protein content is low in potatoes it occurs in a highly bioavailable form. A study conducted in Germany in 1997 and Pakistan in 2011 found a significant difference in the protein content of different cultivars [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref45">45</xref>] . In a study conducted in Jordan, in which the Mondial cultivar was also included, it was observed to have the lowest protein content of all the cultivars in that trial. In the current study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>), Mondial had an average protein content of 1.49 g/100g when compared to the other cultivars included in the study. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) food database reports protein values of white potato tubers to be between 1.00 - 1.97 g/100g. The New Zealand and Australian food database reports protein levels of 2.3 g/100g. These levels are slightly higher than the levels found in the current study. Protein content differs significantly between cultivars (0.883 - 1.75 g/100g) with Buffelspoort and Fianna containing almost double the protein found in UTD. Potatoes are one of the best plant sources of the amino acid lysine (although not determined in this study) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref41">41</xref>] . Lysine is one of the amino acids that is a necessary component of complete proteins. Protein-energy malnutrition is a regular occurrence in sub-Saharan Africa. The consumption of animal and plant based foods can increase the consumption of complete proteins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref46">46</xref>] .</p><p>Potatoes are naturally very low in fat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref47">47</xref>] with an average fat content of 0.0176 mg/100g as seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. Three of the cultivars contained no detectable fat. The United States Potato Board states that potatoes are naturally fat free, contain no saturated fat and no cholesterol (United States Potato Board, 2013; McGregor, 2011). Potatoes can therefore be promoted as a fat free food in a country with high rates of obesity such as South Africa where 39.2% of women and 20.2% of men are classified as being either overweight or obese [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref48">48</xref>] . Although fat content in all cultivars was very low, statistically significant differences were observed between most cultivars (p &lt; 0.001). At such a low level these differences make little difference to the human diet.</p><p>A review of American grown potatoes showed an average zinc content of 0.35 mg/100g which decreased to 0.30 mg/100g when the potatoes were boiled with its skin. The zinc content can decrease by up to 50% when boiled without the skin. The value for zinc is similar to the values found in the current study. Avalanche had the highest zinc content, 0.473 mg/100g and Sifra the lowest, 0.254 mg/100g. Zinc and iron deficiencies are among the main causes of child morbidity in African countries as a deficiency of these minerals can lead to increase infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref49">49</xref>] . Potatoes generally have a low phytate content which results in a lower inhibitory effect on minerals such as iron and zinc and lead to better absorption of these minerals.</p><p>Compared to other vegetables, the potato is one of the best sources of dietary potassium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref50">50</xref>] . Apart from nitrogen, potassium is the most essential mineral for plant formation and growth. Correct potassium levels improve crop yield, tuber quality, decrease bruising and decrease sugar levels which in turn increase storability. This ensures that tubers can be stored for a longer period of time after harvesting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref51">51</xref>] . Potatoes can be a notable sources of potassium in the human diet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref52">52</xref>] with a 100 g tuber contributing up to 15% of daily nutrient reference values for potassium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref40">40</xref>] . Boiling a potato without the skin can reduce its potassium content by up to 50% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref26">26</xref>] . The tubers in this study had an average potassium content of 439 mg/100g. Darius (537 mg/100g) and Fianna (527 mg/100g) contained the highest amounts potassium and Fabula (370 mg/100g), UTD (401 mg/100g) and Buffeslpoort (383 mg/100g) the lowest. These levels are consistent with those reported in New Zealand and Australia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref53">53</xref>] .</p><p>Together with high levels of potassium, potatoes are naturally low in sodium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref54">54</xref>] . High sodium consumption is seen all over the world as the ingestion of processed foods increases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref55">55</xref>] . Fruit and vegetables in their natural form are low in sodium and a heart healthy option that can decrease the likelihood of hypertension and heart disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref56">56</xref>] . The sodium content of the potatoes in this study varied between 7.38 mg/100g and 9.69 mg/100g with BP1 having the lowest, and Avalanche and Fianna the highest values. In many countries potassium consumption is decreasing due to a decreased consumption of fruits and vegetables and sodium intake is increasing due to over-consumption of processed food [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref57">57</xref>] . Potatoes consumed in their fresh form can be part of the solution to overturn this trend.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Nutrient Contribution to Culinary Application</title><p>The phosphorus content of potatoes has been shown to be directly influenced by the phosphorus concentration in the fertilizer used during production. Correct phosphorus fertilisation of plants increases the yield, but can have a negative effect on the availability of other micronutrients in the soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref58">58</xref>] . Phosphorus levels differed significantly between cultivars with a wide range and an average of 50.3 mg/100g, a lowest value of 35.6 mg/100g found in Mondial and a highest value of 70.3 mg/100g in Darius (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>According to the literature, dry matter values of potatoes most commonly range between 16.5% - 24% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref59">59</xref>] . There is a significant difference in the distribution of dry matter throughout the flesh and skin of the tuber. Peeling, slicing and handling can have an effect on the dry matter content of a tuber. With this all taken into account, dry matter is still the best way to evaluate the total quantity of solids in a tuber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref60">60</xref>] . In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> dry matter values range between 19.3 mg/100g for Van der Plank and 27.3 mg/100g for Fianna. The higher the dry matter content, the lower the water content, which will mean that such a potato has a higher specific gravity. Potatoes with a higher dry matter and low moisture content are mealy, ideal for baking, and potatoes with low dry matter and high moisture content are waxy and ideal for boiling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref61">61</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Nutrient Contribution to Plant Growth</title><p>Certain minerals found in in tubers, be it in trace or significant amounts, contribute to the plants growth and formation.</p><p>Calcium differed significantly between the cultivars, p &lt; 0.001. Calcium levels were found between 3.09 mg/100g in Van der Plank and 5.56 mg/100g in Fabula. The calcium content of potatoes is low and does not contribute meaningfully to the human diet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref62">62</xref>] . The calcium content of tubers does however, play an important role in cell wall structure, which in turn play an important role in texture and eating quality. It increases cell wall stability because it strengthens the links between cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref63">63</xref>] . Fruit and vegetable firmness is essentially determined by the strength of the cell walls. Stronger cell structures also decrease the chance that a potato will form brown or bruised spots [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref51">51</xref>] . This is of significance in relation to machine harvested tubers that are exposed to rough handling. Higher cell wall stability can also increase the storage life of the product [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref64">64</xref>] .</p><p>Like phosphorus, manganese contributes to the total yield of the potato crop resulting in a larger overall crop yield which can contribute to food security (Scott, 2010). Manganese values ranged between 1.19 mg/100g for Fabula and 1.68 mg/100g for Darius and 1.70 mg/100g for Fianna. Manganese is one of the minerals that decreases significantly when a potato is boiled without the peel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref65">65</xref>] . In this study a strong correlation was seen between manganese and protein values (r = 0.7209).</p><p>The main uptake of magnesium by tubers occurs during the tuber initiation phase which is at 31 - 40 days [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref66">66</xref>] . A 290 g serving of cooked potato can provide up to 24% of the required daily allowance of magnesium. The South African values for magnesium in potatoes are higher than those seen in New Zealand and Australia where potatoes have an average of 20 mg/100g [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref53">53</xref>] . Fianna had the highest magnesium content of 32.8 mg/100g and Sifra the lowest, at 20.3 mg/100g. In this study iron values were at a low of 0.618 mg/100g in Van der Plank and a high of 0.942 mg/100g in Darius, which according to the USDA is correlated with colour differences between cultivars [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref67">67</xref>] .</p><p>Zinc together with copper is essential during the plant formation stage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref68">68</xref>] . Copper levels were found to be between 0.0751 mg/100g of Sifra and 0.144 mg/100g of BP1. These are higher concentrations than those found in potatoes from Australia and New Zealand. In their combined food database they reported that potatoes contain 0.038 mg/100g copper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref53">53</xref>] . The results of the present study is also higher than levels reported in Korean potatoes which had an average copper content of 0.067 mg/100g [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref69">69</xref>] . These variations could be due to the effect of irrigation water, as well as postharvest activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.66053-ref70">70</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion and Recommendations</title><p>Potatoes contain significant amounts of potassium and are naturally low in sodium. A medium size potato (100 g) contributes up to 60% of the daily nutrient reference value for manganese. On average tubers contain 0.0177 g/100g making them a naturally low fat product.</p><p>Sub-Saharan Africa is struggling to overcome food insecurity and the micronutrient deficiency epidemic. This can be blamed on the lack of dietary diversity and the consumption of energy dense and nutrient poor foods. Therefore an easy-to-grow nutrient dense carbohydrate crop can be promoted to overcome the problem of a monotonous nutrient poor diet. Potatoes can be promoted as a nutrient dense crop for subsistence farmers to increase dietary diversity for rural households.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The author would like to acknowledgement the support of the University of Pretoria Institutional Research Theme on Food, Nutrition and Well-being, as well as the Agricultural Research Council, Irene, Potatoes South Africa, Coenrad Fick for planting the tubers used in the study and Marie Smith for statistical analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Carmen van Niekerk,1 1,Hettie Sch&#246;nfeldt,1 1,Nicolette Hall,1 1,Beulah Pretorius,1 1, (2016) The Role of Biodiversity in Food Security and Nutrition: A Potato Cultivar Case Study. Food and Nutrition Sciences,07,371-382. doi: 10.4236/fns.2016.75039</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.66053-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO. FAO—Special Event: Food Security and Genetic Diversity. http://www.fao.org/webcast/home/en/item/3153/icode/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, A.D., et al. (2013) What Are We Assessing When We Measure Food Security? A Compendium and Review of Current Metrics. Advances in Nutrition, 4, 481-505.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Food and Agricultural Organisation. FAO Stats. http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sch&amp;ouml;nfeldt, H.C., Kirsten, J.F. and McClachlan, M. (2014) Country Policy Analysis: Nutrition Impact of Agriculture and Food Systems South Africa. United Nations, Pretoria.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO, IFAD and WFP (2014) The State of Food Security in the World. FAO, Rome.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">United Nations (2015) United Nations—Millennium Development Goals and Beyond.  http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/poverty.shtml</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meade, B. and Rosen, S. (2013) International Food Security Assessment, 2013-2023, GFA-24. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, US.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bommarco, R., Kleijn, D. and Potts, S.G. (2013) Ecological Intensification: Harnessing Ecosystem Services for Food Security. Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution, 28, 230-238.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tanuminhardjo, S.A., et al. (2007) Poverty, Obesity, and Malnutrition: An International Perspective Recognizing the Paradox. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 107, 1966-1972.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lear, S.A., et al. (2014) The Association between Ownership of Common Household Devices and Obesity and Diabetes in High, Middle and Low Income Countries. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 186, 258-266.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shisana, O., et al. (2014) The South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey SANHANES-1. HSRC Press, Cape Town.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khoury, C.K., et al. (2014) Increasing Homogeneity in Global Food Supplies and the Implications for Food Security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 4001-4006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Popkin, B.M., Adair, L.S. and Ng, S.W. (2012) Global Nutrition Transition and the Pandemic of Obesity in Developing Countries. Nutrition Reviews, 70, 3-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, L.C. and Haddad, L. (2015) Reducing Child Undernutrition: Past Drivers and Priorities for the Post-MDG Era. World Development, 68, 180-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Papathakis, P.C. and Pearson, K.E. (2012) Food Fortification Improves the Intake of All Fortified Nutrients, But Fails to Meet the Estimated Dietary Requirements for Vitamins A and B6, Riboflavin and Zinc, in Lactating South African Women. Public Health Nutrition, 15, 1810-1817.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grubben, G., et al. (2014) Vegetables to Combat the Hidden Hunger in Africa. Chronica Horticulturae, 54, 24-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muthayya, S., et al. (2013) The Global Hidden Hunger Indices and Maps: An Advocacy Tool for Action. PloS One, 8, 67860.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McCormick, C.L., et al. (2014) Increasing Obesity in Treated Female HIV Patients from Sub-Saharan Africa: Potential Causes and Possible Targets for Intervention. Frontiers in Immunology, 5, 5-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaime, P.C., et al. (2013) Brazilian Obesity Prevention and Control Initiatives. Obesity Reviews, 14, 88-95.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toledo, A. and Burlingame, B. (2006) Biodiversity and Nutrition: A Common Path toward Global Food Security and Sustainable Development. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 19, 477-483.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SANBI. 2015. [Online] http://www.sanbi.org/information</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Potatoes South Africa. 2015. [Online] http://www.potatoes.co.za/SiteResources/documents/Potato%20production%20in%2016%20regions.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Potato Center (2014) Research—Potato Highlands. [Online] http://cipotato.org/potato/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Drewnowski, A. and Specter, S.E. (2004) Poverty and Obesity: The Role of Energy Density and Energy Costs. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 79, 6-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Drewnowski, A. and Rehm, C.D. (2013) Vegetable Cost Metrics Show That Potatoes and Beans Provide Most Nutrients per Penny. PLoS ONE, 8, e63277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063277</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Potatoes South Africa (2014) Industry Report. [Online] http://www.potatoes.co.za/industry-information.aspx</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Food Composition Database (1999) South African Food Data System. [Online] http://safoods.mrc.ac.za/foodcomp.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Denner, F. and Venter, S. (2011) Handleiding vir aartappelproduksie in Suid-Afrika. 2nd Edition, Potateos South Africa, Pretoria.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nortje, P., Kleingeld, C. and Visser, A. (2000) Potato Breeding, Evaluation and Commercialisation in South Africa and Opportunities for Australia. Australian Potato Research, Adelaide.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Potatoes South Africa (2013) Industry Report. [Online] http://www.potatoes.co.za/industry-information.aspx</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, T.M., Durance, T. and Scaman, C.H. (1998) Characterization of Vacuum Microwave, Air and Freeze Dried Carrot Slices. Food Research International, 31, 111-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(98)00070-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giron, H.C. (1973) Perkin Elmer Atomic Spectrophotometer. Atomic Absorption Newsletter, 12, 28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gilani, G.S. and Nasim, A. (2007) Impact of Foods Nutritionally Enhanced through Biotechnology in Alleviating Malnutrition in Developing Countries. Journal of AOAC International, 90, 1440-1444.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Greenfield, H. and Southgate, D.A. (2003) Food Composition Data. FAO Publishing Management Service, Rome.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Payne, R.W., Murray, D.A., Harding, S.A., Baird, D.B. and Soutar, D.M. (2012) GenStat&amp;reg; for Windows TM Introduction. 15th Edition, VSN International, Hemel Hempstead.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steyn, N., Nel, J. and Labadarios, D. (2009) Will Fortification of Staple Foods Make a Difference to the Dietary Intake of South African Children? South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 21, 22-26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parsa, S., Ccanto, R. and Rosenheim, J. (2011) Resource Concentration Dilutes a Key Pest in Indigenous Potato Agriculture. Ecological Applications, 21, 539-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/10-0393.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Slavin, J.L. (2013) Carbohydrates, Dietary Fiber, and Resistant Starch in White Vegetables: Links to Health Outcomes. Advances in Nutrition, 4, 351-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/an.112.003491</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">King, J.C. and Slavin, J.L. (2013) White Potatoes, Human Health, and Dietary Guidance. Advances in Nutrition, 4, 393-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/an.112.003525</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Department of Health (2014) Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfectant Act, 1972 (ACT No.54 of 1972) Regulations Relating to the Labelling and Advertising of Foods: Amendment (R429 of May 2014). Government Gazette, Pretoria.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peksa, A., Kita, A., Kulakowska, K., Aniolowska, M., Hamouz, K. and Nems, A. (2013) The Quality of Protein of Coloured Fleshed Potatoes. Food Chemistry, 141, 2960-2966. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.125</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murniece, I., Karklina, D., Galoburda, R., Santare, D., Skrabule, I. and Costa, H.S. (2011) Nutritional Composition of Freshly Harvested and Stored Latvian Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Varieties Depending on Traditional Cooking Methods. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 24, 699-710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2010.09.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jansky, S.H. and Fajardo, D.A. (2014) Tuber Starch Amylose Content Is Associated with Cold-Induced Sweetening in Potato. Food Science &amp; Nutrition, 2, 628-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.137</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abbas, G., Frooq, K., Hafiz, I.A., Hussain, A., Abbasi, N.A. and Shabbir, G. (2011) Assessment of Processing and Nutritional Quality of Potato Genotypes in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science, 48, 169-175.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jansen, G., Flamme, W., Schüler, K. and Vandrey, M. (2001) Tuber and Starch Quality of Wild and Cultivated Potato Species and Cultivars. Potato Research, 44, 137-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02410100</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sch&amp;ouml;nfeldt, H.C. and Gibson Hall, N. (2012) Dietary Protein Quality and Malnutrition in Africa. British Journal of Nutrition, 108, 69-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512002553</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luis, G., Rubio, C., González-Weller, D., Gutiérrez, A.J., Revert, C. and Hardisson, A. (2011) Comparative Study of the Mineral Composition of Several Varieties of Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) from Different Countries Cultivated in Canary Islands (Spain). International Journal of Food Science &amp; Technology, 46, 774-780. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02556.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steyn, N.P., Labadarios, D. and Nel, J.H. (2011) Factors Which Influence the Consumption of Street Foods and Fast Foods in South Africa—A National Survey. Nutrition Journal, 10, 104-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-10-104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sazawal, S., Dhingra, P., Dhingra, U., Gupta, S., Iyengar, V., Menon, V.P., Sarkar, A. and Black, R.E. (2014) Compliance with Home-Based Fortification Strategies for Delivery of Iron and Zinc: Its Effect on Haematological and Growth Markers among 6-24 Months Old Children in North India. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 32, 217-226.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weichselbaum, E. (2010) REVIEW: An Overview of the Role of Potatoes in the UK Diet. Nutrition Bulletin, 35, 195-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-3010.2010.01845.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, C.R., Haynes, K.G., Moore, M., Pavek, M.J., Hane, D.C., Love, S.L. and Novy, R.G. (2013) Stability and Broad-Sense Heritability of Mineral Content in Potato: Potassium and Phosphorus. American Journal of Potato Research, 90, 516-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12230-013-9323-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Storey, M.L. and Anderson, P. (2013) White Potato Consumption Is Positively Associated with Potassium Intake. The FASEB Journal, 27, 1062-1100.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Food Standards Australia New Zealand (2014) NUTTAB. [Online] http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/science/monitoringnutrients/nutrientables/nuttab/Pages/default.aspx</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McGill, C.R., Kurilich, A.C. and Davingnon, J. (2013) The Role of Potatoes and Potato Components in Cardiometabolic Health: A Review. Annals of Medicine, 45, 467-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2013.813633</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garcia-Garcia, E. and Totosaus, A. (2008) Low-Fat Sodium-Reduced Sausages: Effect of the Interaction between Locust Bean Gum, Potato Starch and κ-Carrageenan by a Mixture Design Approach. Meat Science, 78, 406-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Flock, M.R. and Kris-Etherton, P.M. (2011) Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2010: Implications for Cardiovascular Disease. Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 13, 499-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11883-011-0205-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steffen, L.M. (2014) Lower Levels of Sodium Intake and Reduced Cardiovascular Risk The Challenge to Achieve Lower Sodium Recommendations. Circulation, 129, 956-957. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.007964</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Monteiro, A., Henriques, I. and Moreira, I. (2011) Critical Period for Weed Control in Potatoes in the Huambo Province (Angola). Planta Daninha, 29, 351-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582011000200013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernando, N. and Slater, T. (2010) State Government Victoria, Department of Environment and Primary Industry. [Online] http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/agriculture/horticulture/vegetables/potatoes/potatoes-factors-affecting-dry-matter</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thybo, A.K., Molgaard, J.P. and Kidmose, U. (2002) Effect of Different Organic Growing Conditions on Quality of Cooked Potatoes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 82, 12-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">South African Department of Environment and Primary Industries (2000) Agriculture—Potatoes. [Online] http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/agriculture/horticulture/vegetables/potatoes/potatoes-measurement-specific-gravity</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Camire, M.E., Kubow, S. and Donnelly, D.J. (2009) Potatoes and Human Health. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 49, 823-840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408390903041996</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Palta</surname><given-names> J.P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1996</year>)<article-title>Role of Calcium in Plant Responses to Stresses: Linking Basic Research to the Solution of Practical Problems</article-title><source> HortScience</source><volume> 31</volume>,<fpage> 51</fpage>-<lpage>57</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van der Waals, J.E., Korsten, L. and Slippers, B. (2004) Genetic Diversity among Alternaria solani Isolates from Potatoes in South Africa. Plant Disease, 88, 959-964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.9.959</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dugo, G., La Pera, L., Lo Turcoa, V., Palmieri, R.M. and Saitta, M. (2005) Effect of Boiling and Peeling on Manganese Content of Some Vegetables Determined by Derivative Anodic Stripping Chronopotentiometry (DASCP). Food Chemistry, 93, 703-711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.12.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, Y.-X., Meng, M.-L., Hao, W.-S. and Sun, S.-Y. (2010) A Study on the Magnesium Absorption of Potatoes. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 25, 190-193.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">United States Department of Agriculture. 2012. [Online] http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/vegetables-pulses/potatoes.aspx#.U5GQgyh7yao</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dugo, G., La Pera, L., Lo Turcoa, V., Giuffrida, D. and Restuccia, S. (2004) Determination of Copper, Zinc, Selenium, Lead and Cadmium in Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) Using Potentiometric Stripping Methods. Food Additives and Contaminants, 21, 649-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02652030410001698698</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Choi, M.K., Kang, M.H. and Kim, M.H. (2009) The Analysis of Copper, Selenium, and Molybdenum Contents in Frequently Consumed Foods and an Estimation of Their Daily Intake in Korean Adults. Biological Trace Element Research, 128, 104-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12011-008-8260-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.66053-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moretti, C.L., Mattos, L.M., Calbo, A.G. and Sargent, S.A. (2010) Climate Changes and Potential Impacts on Postharvest Quality of Fruit and Vegetable Crops: A Review. Food Research International, 43, 1824-1832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.10.013</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>