<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2016.77056</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-65822</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Compact Finite Difference Schemes for Solving the Coupled Nonlinear Schrodinger-Boussinesq Equations
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>.</surname><given-names>S. Ismail</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>H.</surname><given-names>A. Ashi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Math, College of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>04</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>605</fpage><lpage>615</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>22</month>	<year>April</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this paper we are going to derive two numerical methods for solving the coupled nonlinear Schrodinger-Boussinesq equation. The first method is a nonlinear implicit scheme of second order accuracy in both directions time and space; the scheme is unconditionally stable. The second scheme is a nonlinear implicit scheme of second order accuracy in time and fourth order accuracy in space direction. A generalized method is also derived where the previous schemes can be obtained by some special values of 
  l
  . The proposed methods will produced a coupled nonlinear tridiagonal system which can be solved by fixed point method. The exact solutions and the conserved quantities for two different tests are used to display the robustness of the proposed schemes.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Coupled Nonlinear Schrodinger-Boussinesq Equation</kwd><kwd> Conserved Quantities</kwd><kwd> Soliton</kwd><kwd> Plane Wave Solution</kwd><kwd> Fixed Point Method</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In this work we are going to derive a highly a accurate schemes for the coupled nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger- Boussinesq equations (CSBE)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2354"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2355"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>represents the complex short wave amplitude, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>represents the long wave amplitude, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are real parameters. Equations (1) and (2) were considered as a model of the inter- actions between short and intermediate long waves, and were originated in describing the dynamics of Langmuir soliton formation, the interaction in plasma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref4">4</xref>] . Numerical solution of coupled nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger equation using different methods can be found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref8">8</xref>] . Few numerical methods exist in literature for solving the CSBE. Zhang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref9">9</xref>] derived a conservative difference scheme to solve the CSBE. Bai et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref2">2</xref>] proposed the time splitting Fourier spectral method and the quadratic B-spline finite element method for solving the CSBE. Recently, a multi-symplectic scheme for solving the CSBE is developed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref10">10</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Exact Solution</title><p>To derive the exact solution of the given system (1)-(2), we assume the solution of the CSBE of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2356"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2357"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2358"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By substituting (3) and (4) into (1) and (2), and after lengthy calculations, we found that the solution exists if we have the following relations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2359"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and c are arbitrary constant.</p><p>The system (1)-(2) also has a plane wave solution</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2360"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where A, k, and d are constants.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Properties of the CSBE</title><p>In order to study the properties of the coupled nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger-Boussinesq equation, we consider the initial boundary value problem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref10">10</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2361"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2362"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the initial conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2363"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and boundary conditions of the forms</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2364"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are given smooth functions and these functions can be extracted from the exact solution, and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2365"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By introducing the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2366"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the boundary conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2367"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the CSBE coupled system can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2368"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2369"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2370"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For the initial-boundary value problem (13)-(14), there are at least three conservation laws [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>1) The Langmuir Plasmon number</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2371"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>2) The total perturbed number density</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2372"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>3) The total energy</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2373"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Physically, these conserved laws play major roles in all physical theories, and can be useful tools for qualitative analysis. Trapezoidal rule and the numerical solution are used to calculate the conserved quantities. The conservation of the conserved quantities for the proposed system using the numerical methods presented in this work is a good indication for the efficiency and robustness these methods.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Numerical Methods</title><p>In order to avoid the complex computation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref7">7</xref>] we assume</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2374"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>so, the CSBE can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2375"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2376"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2377"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x38.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2378"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2379"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We will consider the numerical solution of the nonlinear system (20)-(23) in a finite interval <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> We assume <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and h is the space grid step size, also we assume <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where k is the time grid step size, we assume <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> We denote the exact and numerical solutions at the grid point <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, respectively.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Second Order Scheme</title><p>The Crank Nicolson like scheme for the system (20)-(23) can be displayed as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2380"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2381"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x50.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2382"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2383"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2384"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x53.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The scheme in (25)-(28) is a nonlinear implicit scheme with block nonlinear tridiagonal structure. The fixed point method is used to solve this system. The scheme is of second order accuracy in both direction space and time. The scheme is unconditionally stable using the von Neumann stability analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Fourth Order Scheme</title><p>In order to improve the accuracy in space direction, we approximate the second space derivative using the compact approximation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2385"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>by using this , we will can derive the highly accurate compact finite difference scheme</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2386"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2387"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2388"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2389"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The scheme in (29)-(32) is a nonlinear implicit scheme of fourth order accuracy in space and second order in time. To obtain the numerical solution, we need to solve a block nonlinear tridiagonal system at each time step. We have done this by using fixed point method. Using von Neumann stability analysis the scheme is also unconditionally stable.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Generalized Finite Difference Scheme</title><p>In this subsection we present the generalized finite difference scheme of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2390"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2391"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x60.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2392"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2393"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an arbitrary constant. The scheme (33)-(36) is of second order accuracy in time and space for all</p><p>values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> The scheme is unconditionally stable. It is very easy to see that for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we will get the second order method (25)-(28), while <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> produced the fourth order method (29)-(32). In the next</p><p>subsection we present a fixed point iterative scheme to solve the nonlinear system obtained.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Fixed Point Method</title><p>In order to get the numerical solution for the nonlinear system (33)-(36), we propose the following fixed point iterative scheme of the following form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2394"><label>(37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2395"><label>(38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2396"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x69.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2397"><label>(40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2398"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2399"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x73.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We apply the iterative scheme (37)-(40) until the following condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2400"><label>(43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x74.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is satisfied. Tol is a very small prescribed value.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Accuracy of the Generalized Scheme</title><p>To study the accuracy of the proposed scheme, we will consider only Equation (33), the other equations can be analyzed in the similar fashion. By replacing the numerical solution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by the exact solution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2401"><label>(44)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By using Taylor’s series expansions of all terms in Equation (44), we will end with the local truncation error (LTE)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2402"><label>(45)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and this indicates that, the scheme is of second order accuracy in space and time directions for arbitrary</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>It is very interesting to notice that for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the local truncation will be reduced to the fourth order</p><p>accuracy in space and second order accuracy in time.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conserved Quantities</title><p>To prove that the decomposed system</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2403"><label>(46)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2404"><label>(47)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2405"><label>(48)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>satisfies the conserved quantities</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2406"><label>(49)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2407"><label>(50)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we multiply Equation (46) and Equation (47) by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively to get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2408"><label>(51)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2409"><label>(52)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>by adding (51) and (52), this will lead us after some manipulation to the following equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2410"><label>(53)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x90.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By integrating (53) with respect to x, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2411"><label>(54)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x91.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By imposing the vanishing boundary conditions, Equation (54) will be reduced to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2412"><label>(55)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is Equation (49).</p><p>To prove the second conserved quantity , by integrating Equation (48) with respect to x and this will lead us to the following</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2413"><label>(56)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x93.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and by imposing the vanishing boundary conditions, this will lead us to the second conserved quantity (50).</p><p>To prove that the proposed schemes preserve the discrete analog of the invariant (49) and (50), we borrow the following lemma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65822-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Lemma 1 For any two discrete functions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>there is the identity</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2414"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x96.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2415"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2416"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x98.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We will only prove the Crank Nicolson (25)-(28).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2417"><label>(57)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2418"><label>(58)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we multiply (57) by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and (58) by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and then by adding the resulting equations to obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2419"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x103.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>or</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2420"><label>(59)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is the discrete analog of the conserved quantity (49), this indicates that no blow up in the numerical solution, and it it is a good indication the scheme is unconditionally stable. The second discrete conserved quantity can be easily obtained.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Numerical Results</title><p>In this section , we will test the proposed schemes for two different problems. The infinity error norm is used to calculate the error, and this can be defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2421"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x105.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2422"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x106.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2423"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Trapezoidal rule is used to approximate the conserved quantities. We will present some numerical results for the solitary wave solutions and the plane wave solutions for the coupled Schrodinger-Boussinesq equations.</p><sec id="s8_1"><title>8.1. Solitary Wave Solution</title><p>In this test, we choose the initial conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2424"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x108.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2425"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x109.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> We choose the set of parameters</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2426"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x111.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, we present the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> error norms and the conserved quantities for second and fourth order schemes respectively. Both methods preserve the conserved quantities almost exactly. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> display the numerical solution of the proposed system for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Results in both tables show the superior performance of both schemes in solving numerically the CSBEs equation, though the fourth order outperform the second order method as it produces the most accurate solution.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>error norms and the conserved quantities for Crank Nicolson method</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >T</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200175</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000080</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200155</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000037</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200138</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000068</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000066</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000164</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200121</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000078</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200121</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000263</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200116</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>error norms and the conserved quantities for the fourth order method</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >T</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200175</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200175</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200175</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200176</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200176</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200175</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Single soliton:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x128.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Single soliton:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x130.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s8_2"><title>8.2. Plane Wave Solution</title><p>The initial conditions in this case are chosen as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2427"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x132.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2428"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x133.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In this test we select the set of parameters</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2429"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x134.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>together with the boundary conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65822-formula2430"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x135.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The conserved quantities and the infinity error norm are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> for second and fourth order numerical schemes respectively. The results show that the two schemes solve this problem exactly and conserve the conserved quantities exactly as well. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, we display the modulus of the numerical solution of U at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p></sec></sec><sec id="s9"><title>9. Conclusion</title><p>In this work, we transform the coupled Schr&#246;dinger-Boussinesq equations into a first order differential system in time. We derived two different numerical schemes. Using these methods, a coupled nonlinear block tridiagonal system is obtained. A fixed point iterative method is used to solve this system. The numerical tests and the conserved quantities show the efficiency and robustness of the schemes. To sum up, the proposed schemes are</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Crank Nicolson λ = 0 plane wave solution</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >T</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.141593</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.283185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.571566</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.141593</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.283185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.571566</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.141592</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.283185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.571566</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.141592</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.283185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.571566</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.141592</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.283185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.571566</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.141592</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.283185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.571566</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Fourth order method with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> plane wave solution</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >T</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.141593</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.283185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.571566</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.141593</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.283185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.571566</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.141593</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.283185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.571566</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.141593</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.283185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.571567</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.141593</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.283185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.571567</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.141593</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.283185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.571567</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Plane wave solution with paraamters: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and d = 0.5</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7403089x146.png"/></fig><p>reliable and capable to solve like systems.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>M. S. Ismail,H. A. Ashi, (2016) A Compact Finite Difference Schemes for Solving the Coupled Nonlinear Schrodinger-Boussinesq Equations. Applied Mathematics,07,605-615. doi: 10.4236/am.2016.77056</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.65822-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bai, D. and Zhang, L. (2011) The Quadratic B-Spline Finite Element Method for the Coupled Schr?dinger-Boussinesq Equations. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 88, 1714-1729.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207160.2010.522234 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65822-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bai, D. and Wang, J. (2012) The Time-Splitting Fourier Spectral Method for the Coupled Schr?dinger-Boussinesq Equations. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 17, 1201-1210.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.08.012 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65822-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fan, E. (2000) Extended Tanh-Function Method and Its Applications to Nonlinear Equations. Physics Letters A, 277, 212-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00725-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65822-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fan, E. (2003) An Algebraic Method for Finding a Series of Exact Solutions to Integrable and Non-Integrable Nonlinear Evolution Equations. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 36, 7009-7026.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/36/25/308</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65822-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ismail, M.S. and Taha, T.R. (2001) Numerical Simulation of Coupled Nonlinear Schr?dinger Equation. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 56, 547-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(01)00324-X </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65822-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ismail, M.S. and Alamri, S.Z. (2004) Highly Accurate Finite Difference Method for Coupled Nonlinear Schr?dinger Equation. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 81, 333-351.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207160410001661339 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65822-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ismail, M.S. and Taha, T.R. (2007) A Linearly Implicit Conservative Scheme for the Coupled Nonlinear Schr?dinger Equation. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 74, 302-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2006.10.020 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65822-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, T., Gue, B. and Zhang, L. (2010) New Conservative Schemes for Coupled Nonlinear Schr?dinger System. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217, 1604-1619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.07.040 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65822-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, L., Bai, D. and Wang, S. (2011) Numerical Analysis for a Conservative Difference Scheme to Solve the Schr?dinger-Boussinesq Equation. JCAM, 235, 4899-4915. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65822-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, L.Y., Jiao, Y.D. and Liang, D.-M. (2013) Multi-Symplectic Scheme for the Coupled Schr?dinger Boussinesq Equations. Chinese Physics B, 22, 07020-1-07020-5. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65822-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chang, Q., Jia, E. and Sun, W. (1999) Difference Schemes for Solving the Generalized Nonlinear Schr?dinger Equation. Journal of Computational Physics, 148, 397-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1998.6120 </mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>