<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">NR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Natural Resources</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-706X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/nr.2016.74016</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">NR-65566</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Valuable Biomolecules from Nine North Atlantic Red Macroalgae: Amino Acids, Fatty Acids, Carotenoids, Minerals and Metals
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ehnaz</surname><given-names>Razi Parjikolaei</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Annette</surname><given-names>Bruhn</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Karin</surname><given-names>Loft Eybye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>Mørk Larsen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Michael</surname><given-names>Bo Rasmussen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Knud</surname><given-names>Villy Christensen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xavier</surname><given-names>C. Fretté</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Silkeborg, Denmark</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Food Technology Department, Life Science Division, Danish Technological Institute, Aarhus, Denmark</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>04</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>157</fpage><lpage>183</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>15</month>	<year>April</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In modern society, novel marine resources are scrutinized pursuing compounds of use in the medical, pharmaceutical, biotech, food or feed industry. Few of the numerous marine macroalgae are currently exploited. In this study, the contents of nutritional compounds from nine common North Atlantic red macroalgae were compared: the lipid content was low and constant among the species, whereas the fatty acid profiles indicated that these species constitute interesting sources of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). The dominating essential and non-essential amino acids were lysine and leucine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, and arginine, respectively. The amino acid score of the nine algae varied from 44% to 92%, the most commonly first limiting amino acid being histidine. Lutein, 
  <em>β</em>-carotene, and zeaxanthin were the identified carotenoids. Contents of all macro and trace minerals, with the exception of phosphorus, were higher than those described for conventional food. Low sodium/potassium ratios (0.08 - 2.54) suggested a potential for using the ash fraction for sodium salt replacement. The algae constituted rich sources of carbohydrates (40% to 71% of DM) which show their potential for a broader commercial exploitation. In some species, the concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, and lead exceeded limit values for application in food or feed. In conclusion, the nine algae represent promising potential sources of health promoting additives for human and animal diets, in whole or in a biorefinery concept.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Protein</kwd><kwd> Lipid</kwd><kwd> Carotenoids</kwd><kwd> Dry Matter</kwd><kwd> Arsenic</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In modern society attention is directed towards new and unexploited marine resources in pursuit of compounds of use in the medical, pharmaceutical, biotech, food or feed industry. Marine macroalgae contain an unknown number of bioactive compounds, of which a limited fraction has yet been discovered, investigated and characterized, and even less commercially exploited [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] . Among macroalgae, red macroalgae are the most diversified with the largest number of species, counting approximately 4000 species on a global scale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref3">3</xref>] . Red algae are sources of various known valuable biomolecules such as proteins, peptides, amino acids, pigments, antioxidants, as well as hydrocolloids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref4">4</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref7">7</xref>] . A few species of red algaeare are currently exploited in the food industry, either serving as food directly (nori and dulse) or as raw material for the production of gelling agents (phycocolloids) such as agar and carrageenan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref6">6</xref>] . With the increased global demand for proteins, as well as functional food ingredients, the interest in red algae is expected to increase. Among the macroalgae, the red algae generally hold high protein concentrations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref8">8</xref>] . For instance, the protein content of Palmaria palmata and Porphyra tenera can represent up to 35% and 44% of DM, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref9">9</xref>] . These levels are comparable to protein contents found in protein-rich legumes such as soybeans (35% of DM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref10">10</xref>] . However, not only protein quantity, but also protein quality is of importance, and the Amino Acid (AA) composition of macroalgae is attractive, also for animal feed production, since in particular the content of sulphated AAs, such as methionine, is higher in algae than in plant proteins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref11">11</xref>] . Another class of biomolecules of nutritional value from macroalgae is the essential ω3 fatty acids, which are composed of long-chain PUFAs. Presently, the most common source of long chain PUFAs for nutraceuticals and feed is fish oil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref12">12</xref>] . Viewed in the light of the rapid decrease in the world fish populations, alternative sources of ω3 fatty acids, such as marine macro- and microalgae must be exploited [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref14">14</xref>] . Recent market research estimated the global demand for ω3 ingredients to be about $1.56 billion in 2010, expected to reach $4 billion in 2018. In addition to the long chain fatty acids, macroalgae are important sources of carotenoids which are natural red, orange, and yellow pigments comprising a complex class of hydrocarbons (carotenes such as α- and β-carotene) and their oxygenated derivatives (xanthophylls, such as astaxanthin, fucoxanthin, lutein and zeaxanthin) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] . Carotenoids are known for their anti-cancer, antioxidant properties and activity against obesity which makes them an attractive class of high-value compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref15">15</xref>] . Industrially, carotenoids are used in pharmaceuticals, animal feed as well as colorants in cosmetics and foods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref16">16</xref>] . Moreover, carotenoids are utilized in aquaculture feed and are responsible for pigmentation of muscle in fish for consumption and skin color in ornamental fish [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref18">18</xref>] . The current market value of commercially used carotenoids was estimated at nearly $1.2 billion in 2010 which with an annual growth rate of 2.3% has the potential to reach $1.4 billion in 2018 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref19">19</xref>] . Macroalgae are described as valuable sources of minerals for human and animal nutrition, with higher concentrations of essential macro minerals (i.e. K, Ca, Na) and trace elements (i.e. Fe, Cu, Zn) than terrestrial plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref20">20</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>The main tissue component of macroalgae is typically carbohydrates, serving as structural components of the cell walls as well as for energy storage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref23">23</xref>] . Nutritionally, carbohydrate is the most important class of compounds for the metabolism as carbohydrates supply the majority of the energy (35% - 70%) needed for respiration and other metabolic processes in all living organism. However, red macroalgae constitute a rich source of unique polysaccharides with bioactive properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref1">1</xref>] , and already specific sulphated polysaccharides e.g. agar, carrageenan, furcellaran and floridian starch, are being commercially exploited for their gelling properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>The North Atlantic macroalgae species Chondrus crispus is traditionally applied for production of carrageenan, a highly sulfated polysaccharide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref24">24</xref>] . The cold water species contain specific types of carrageenan, that are not available from the cultivated warm water carrageenophytes, Kappaphycus alvarezii (Cottonii) and Eucheuma denticulatum (Spinosum) and thus they are of relatively high value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref6">6</xref>] . Gracilaria sp. is one of the two most important agarophytes in the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref6">6</xref>] . The global market for hydrocolloids is increasing, in particular within the food industry, and the industry calls for innovation within algae cultivation and breeding as well as a broadening of the selection of species exploited [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>The wealth of attractive biomolecules in marine macroalgae drives an increasing number of patent applications on specific uses of macroalgae in particular in the food, agri- and aquaculture, and human health industries. The increase in patent claims, as well as in seaweed production, is clearly skewed towards the Asian countries where seaweed consumption and cultivation have deeper cultural roots than in Western countries. However, western countries giving priority to biotechnology investments are also moving forward in the field of patent applications and scientific work on novel applications and cultivation of seaweed. North Atlantic waters offer a rich potential of already exploited as well as unexploited species of red macroalgae. As an example, in the Inner Danish waters, at the transition zone between the North Sea and the Baltic Sea, up to 422 species of macroalgae are described [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref25">25</xref>] .</p><p>In the present work, the objective was to map the content of nutritionally attractive biomolecules of nine common species of North Atlantic red algae species to gain extensive information about their nutritional value and evaluate their applicability in human food, as well as in animal diet. The aspects of minerals in the context of nutrition, as well as metals in the context of food safety were also discussed. The nine species reported to contain high value biomolecules were selected. Here of two known “bench mark species” Palmaria palmata (Linnaeus) Kuntze and Chondrus crispus (Stackhouse) were chosen to compare with seven relatively undescribed species, covering different phylogeny and morphology, but still fulfilling a criteria of general availability, accessibility, and robustness as seeding stock for potential future cultivation.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Algae Samples</title><p>Nine species of red macroalgae were selected: Delesseria sanguinea (Hudson) J.V. Lamouroux, Dilsea carnosa (Schmidel) Kuntze, Odonthalia dentata (Linnaeus) Lyngbye, P. palmata, Phycodrys rubens (Linnaeus) Batters, C. crispus, Furcellaria lumbricalis (Hudson) J. V. Lamouroux, Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Ohmi) Papenfuss, and Ahnfeltia plicata (Hudson) E. M. Fries (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Fresh algae were collected between the 15<sup>th</sup> and 19<sup>th</sup> of September 2011 by scuba diving at depths between 0 and 5 meters. G. vermiculophylla was collected in Horsens Fjord, Denmark (N55˚52'43, E09˚59'12), while the remaining eight species were collected at Forn&#230;s, Denmark (N56˚26'35, E09˚59'12). Species identification was based on 25 years of experience with taxonomy of Danish algae, and Rosenvinge (1909, 1918, 1931). Samples were transported to the laboratory in fresh, cool seawater.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Species, family, compounds (and bioactivities) of interest, growth rate and global distribution of the studied red algae</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Algal species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Family</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compound (bioactivity)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Growth rate1 (% d-1)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Distribution2</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ahnfeltia plicata (Ap)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ahnfeltiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agar<sup>4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA, SA, NP, SP, AO</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chondrus crispus (Cc)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gigartinaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carrageenan, β-carotene<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 - 2.6 (% week-1)<sup>11</sup>, 6<sup>12</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA, BS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Delesseria sanguinea (Ds)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Delesseriaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sulphated polysaccharide (anti-inflammatory)<sup>6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>13</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA, BS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dilsea carnosa (Dc)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dumontiaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Anti-fungal)<sup>7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA, NP, BS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Furcellaria lumbricalis (Fl)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Furcellariaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Furcellaran</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1 2.7<sup>14</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA, BS, IO</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Gv)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gracilariaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agar<sup>5</sup>, lectin, tocopherol, phycobiliproteins<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 <sup>15</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA, NP, MS, SP,</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Odonthalia dentata (Od)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rhodomelaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Anti-fungal)<sup>7</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA, AO, NP</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palmaria palmata (Pp)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palmariaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein<sup>5</sup>, xylans<sup>8</sup>, kainic acid<sup>9</sup>, β-carotene<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9<sup>16</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA, SA, NP, SP, AO, BS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phycodrys rubens (Pr)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Delesseriaceae</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sterols<sup>1</sup>, Carotenoids<sup>18</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1<sup>16</sup>, 1 - 2<sup>17</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA, NP, BS</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>Growth rate refers to cultivation in landbased or laboratory systems; <sup>2</sup>Distribution is based on Algaebase (http://www.algaebase.org). NA: North Atlantic Ocean, SA: South Atlantic Ocean, NP: North Pacific Ocean, SP: South Pacific Ocean, BS: Baltic Sea, IO: Indian Ocean, MS: Mediterranean Sea, AO: Arctic Ocean; <sup>3</sup>n.d. no data; <sup>4</sup>Mansilla et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref107">107</xref>] ; <sup>5</sup>Holdt &amp; Kraan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] ; <sup>6</sup>Gr&#252;newald et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref134">134</xref>] ; <sup>7</sup>Tariq [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref135">135</xref>] ; <sup>8</sup>Lahaye &amp; Vigouroux [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref136">136</xref>] ; <sup>9</sup>Mouritsen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref36">36</xref>] ; <sup>10</sup>Dauguet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref137">137</xref>] ; <sup>11</sup>Bidwell [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref110">110</xref>] ; <sup>12</sup>Corey et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref114">114</xref>] ; <sup>13</sup>Potin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref138">138</xref>] ; <sup>14</sup>Martin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref139">139</xref>] ; <sup>15</sup>Abreu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref118">118</xref>] ; <sup>16</sup>van de Poll [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref140">140</xref>] ; <sup>17</sup>Gordillo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref141">141</xref>] ; <sup>18</sup>Razi Parjikolaei personal communication.</p><p>In the laboratory, the samples were thoroughly rinsed in fresh water, carefully wiped dry with paper tissue and stored until analysis at −20˚C. Subsamples of all algae samples were freeze-dried (European Freeze Dry ApS, Denmark) and ground through a 1 mm sieve using a Retsch ultra centrifugal mill (Type ZM1) (SkanLab, Denmark). The powdered samples were stored at −20˚C until further analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Analytical Methods</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Dry Matter and Ash</title><p>The DM content was determined by weighing the difference in mass before and after the freeze-drying process and expressed in grams per 100 grams of fresh material. Regarding the ash analysis, a known amount of sample was weighed before and after incineration at a temperature of 525˚C for 16 hours (Nordisk Metodikkomit&#233; for Levnedsmidler (NMKL) 173:2005). The result was expressed as the percentage of ash in algae DM.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Nitrogen and Protein</title><p>The total amount of nitrogen (N) was measured according to two methods, the Kjeldahl method as well as by the Pregl-Dumas (Leco’s CNS 2000, USA) ignition in pure oxygen atmosphere, followed by chromatographic separation of carbon (C), hydrogen (H) and nitrogen (N) with detection of the individual elements by thermal conductivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref26">26</xref>] . All analyses were performed according to Danish Accreditation no. 411, with certified reference material BCR 279 for CHN analysis used for verification of analytical quality. Recently, a global conversion factor to be used for protein estimation in macroalgae has been suggested to be five [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref27">27</xref>] , however, in order to compare the crude protein content of the algae studied in the present work with values of other studies, the amount of crude protein was calculated using a conversion factor of 6.25 (NMKL 6.4, 2003 mod). The content of inorganic N was calculated by subtracting the total Kjeldahl N (TKN) from the total N (TN) value of the Dumas method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref28">28</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_3"><title>2.2.3. Amino Acids</title><p>The determination of AAs was done according to the EU 152/2009 (A) and ISO 13903:2005 methods. In brief, 200 mg of algae powder was oxidized at 0˚C with a hydrogen peroxide (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)/formic acid (VWR, Fontenay-sous-Bois, France). The oxidized sample was hydrolyzed with a mixture of 6 M hydrochloric acid (Chemsolute, Th. Geyer, Roskilde, Denmark) and 0.1% phenol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at 110˚C for 23 hours and the hydrolyzates were adjusted to pH 2.2. The AAs were separated by Biochrom 30 (Bie &amp; Berntsen A/S, Herlev, Denmark), an ion exchange chromatography system using post column derivatization with ninhydrin with a photometric detection at 570 nm (440 nm for proline).</p><p>Identification and quantification of the individual AAs was done by comparing the retention time and peak area with standards (Sigma-Aldrich, Munich, Germany) and the area of the internal standard norleucine using the Biochrom BioSys software. Cystine and cysteine were oxidized to cysteic acid and calculated as the sum of both cysteine equivalents. To compensate for loss due to hydrolyzation, the tyrosine concentration was corrected by a factor of 1.19. Tryptophan was destroyed during hydrolyzes and a specific procedure for detection of tryptophan was not applied. Amino acid content was expressed as percent of total AA. The AA results were furthermore converted to g/100g protein content calculated based on the Kjeldahl method.</p><p>Essential AAs (EAAs) were compared with AA requirement for 3 - 14 years school child/adolescent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref29">29</xref>] and calculated by the updated method of WHO/FAO/UNU as shown below:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65566-formula267"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2000590x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The essential amino acid index (EAAI) compares the protein quality and is more associated with the biological quality of a protein than the AA score. It is calculated as the geometric mean value of the ratios for EAA (Ile, Leu, Lys, Met+Cys, Phe+Tyr, Thr, Val, and His), and values above 100 are considered as 100 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref30">30</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_4"><title>2.2.4. Total Lipid</title><p>The freeze-dried samples were hydrolyzed using ethanolic 12 M hydrochloric acid (Chemsolute, Th. Geyer, Roskilde, Denmark/ethanol 96%, Kemethyl, K&#248;ge, Denmark). After drying the sample, fat was subsequently extracted with a mixture of diethyl ether (Sigma-Aldrich A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) and petroleum ether (Sigma-Aldrich A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark). The extract was concentrated and weighed according to the Schmid-Bondzynski-Ratzlaff (SBR) principle (Nordisk Metodikkomit&#233; for Levnedsmidler (NMKL) 131:1989, mod). The result was expressed as the percentage of lipids in algae DM.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_5"><title>2.2.5. Fatty Acids</title><p>The FA composition was obtained by extracting lipids from powdered samples by the Schmid-Bondzynski-Ratslaff (SBR) method (NMKL 131: 1989). The FAs were then derivatized with sodium methylate (IUPAC 2301), and the derivatized samples (fatty acid methyl esters) were analyzed using gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC-FID) (AOCS Ce 1h-05). The equipment was a GC-FID Agilent 7890A system (Glostrup , Denmark) and separation was performed on a Omegawax<sup>TM</sup> column (length 30 m, internal diameter 0.25 mm and film thickness 0.25 &#181;m) (Supelco, #24136, Sigma-Aldrich A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark). The inlet temperature was 250˚C and detector temperature 260˚C. Oven temperature was initially at 50˚C for one minute, and then ramped 20˚C min<sup>−1</sup> to 170˚C, followed by 1˚C min<sup>−1</sup> to 225˚C, and held at 225˚C for 5 minutes. Total runtime was 67 minutes. Volume injected: one μL with a split ratio of 100:1. Identification and concentration of FAs was determined by retention times and comparison of peak areas with pure standards, GLC744, GLC411 (Nu- Check Prep, Elysian, USA) and PUFA-3 (Sigma-Aldrich A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark). Fatty acid concentrations were expressed as percentage of the total area of all FA peaks (O. dentata was excluded from this analysis due to the low sample volume available).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_6"><title>2.2.6. Carbohydrate</title><p>Total carbohydrate content in percentage was estimated by subtracting the sum of lipid, protein, and ash values from 100% of DM. Contents of carbohydrate were expressed as the percentage of algae DM.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_7"><title>2.2.7. Carotenoids</title><p>Extraction and identification of the carotenoids was carried out as described by Razi Parjikolaei et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref31">31</xref>] . During high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Agilent 1200 series, Glostrup, Denmark) analysis, peak assignment was performed by comparing the retention times and line spectral properties obtained from photodiode array detection with standards of fucoxanthin (Sigma-Aldrich A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), zeaxanthin, lutein and β-carotene (Extrasynthese, Genay, France). For precise carotenoid identification, analyses of the extracts were also performed with the same column and eluting conditions with an HPLC hyphenated with a mass spectrometer (Accela LTQ ion trap XL ETD, Thermo Scientific<sup>TM</sup>, Waltham, MA, USA). The LC-MSMS method was similar to the one described by Gentili and Caretti [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref32">32</xref>] . All solvents were of HPLC grade (VWR Prolabo, Herlev, Denmark).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_8"><title>2.2.8. Elemental Analysis</title><p>A sub-sample of 0.4 g of the freeze-dried and homogenized algae was taken for microwave digestion in closed vessels by Multiwave (Anton Paar, Graz, Austria), adding 10 mL of conc. HNO<sub>3</sub>, 1 mL H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (both suprapur, Merck, Darmstadt Germany) and 10 mL of Milli-Q water (&gt;18 MOhm). After digestion, each sample was transferred into a pre-weighed polyethylene jar. Eighty mL Milli-Q water was added and the jar weighed again to calculate the dilution. Metal concentrations were quantified using an Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) 7500 cs (Agilent, USA) with a Babington nebulizer connected to a cooled spray chamber (5˚C). The mist was introduced into an argon (Ar) plasma operating at 1.500 W with 15 L Ar per minute. The plasma ionized metals were passed through an off-axis ion lens system and an Octopole Reaction Cell (ORC) in three passes with either Hydrogen, Helium or no gas to minimize interferences from multielement interferences (e.g. Ar-Cl on As), before final detection using quadropole mass spectrometer. Standard mass-overlap correction from the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) method 6020 was used to correct 75 arsenic (As) and 111 cadmium (Cd). External calibration was performed on the corrected ion counts. During the run, drift was corrected by using a pumped solution of 100 ppb rhodium (Rh) and indium (In) (both Johnson Matthey, Alfa product, MA, USA) and 500 ppb germanium (Ge) (SCP science, Quebec, Canada). The optimum combination of internal standard and ORC gas was used for all elements. For Cd and Zn, determinations were based on atomic absorption spectrometry. Zn was determined using acetylene-air flame atomic absorption and finally Cd using transversally heated graphite furnace atomic absorption both on Perkin Elmer 3300 (PerkinElmer Inc., MA, USA). All analyses were performed according to Danish Accreditation no. 411, with certified reference material IAEA 140 for ICP-MS analysis used for verification of analytical quality.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Presentation of Data and Statistical Analysis</title><p>All analyses of carotenoids, elements, and the Dumas nitrogen were carried out on triplicate biological samples and data was presented as average &#177; standard error (SE). All other analyses had to be carried out as single or double samples due to the limited amount of sample available. Relative expanded uncertainty of the applied methods for analyzing the lipid, DM, ash, protein (Kjeldahl method), as well as FA and AA reported are based on a standard uncertainty of each method multiplied by a coverage factor of 2 (k = 2), providing the 95% confidence interval. All statistical analyses were performed using linear regression analysis in JMP 10.0 (SAS Institute Inc.). The level of significance applied was 0.05, except when stated otherwise.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Basic Composition―Dry Matter, Protein, Lipid, Carbohydrate and Ash</title><p>The DM content of most of the studied fresh algae ranged from 18% to 43% of fresh weight (FW); the highest DM content was found in A. plicata while D. carnosa had the lowest DM content (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). For all algae, protein concentrations calculated based on the total N (Dumas) (14.9% - 31.1% of DM) were 8% - 34% higher than the crude protein concentrations obtained using the Kjeldahl method (12.3% - 25.6% of DM). P. rubens had the highest protein content (25.6% of DM) according to the Kjeldahl method, while A. plicata had a higher protein content (31.1% of DM) when using the Dumas method (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The discrepancy between the N concentrations obtained by the two methods ranged between 1.7% and 9.3% of DM, most likely representing intracellularly stored inorganic N (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The total lipid content of the nine studied algae varied only marginally from 1.0% to 1.3% of DM, with the highest lipid contents in G. vermiculophylla and P. rubens (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The carbohydrate content of the studied algae ranged between 40% and 71% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The highest carbohydrate content was observed in P. palmata (71% of DM) followed by G. vermiculophylla (62% of DM), while the lowest carbohydrate content was found in P. rubens (40% of DM). Ash constituted a relatively high proportion of the DM, ranging from 12% to 30% of DM (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Dry matter (% fresh weight), lipid, ash, carbohydrate, protein and total nitrogen content (% dry matter) of studied red algae</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Algal species<sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Dry matter</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Lipid<sup>5</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Ash</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Carbohydrate</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Protein<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Inorganic nitrogen</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kjeldahl method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dumas method<sup>3</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ap</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.1 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gv</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.4 &#177; 1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.9 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ds</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.4 &#177; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Od</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.<sup>4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.8 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Expanded uncertainty (%)<sup>6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>Letters designate algal species given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>; <sup>2</sup>Protein = Nitrogen*6.25; <sup>3</sup>Protein content calculated from nitrogen concentration based on the Dumas method is given as average &#177; SE, n = 3; <sup>4</sup>n.d.: not detected due to insufficient sample volume; <sup>5</sup>Lipid content and fatty acids composition of Odonthalia dentata (Od) was not detected due to insufficient sample volume; <sup>6</sup>Relative expanded uncertainty of each applied method reported based on a standard uncertainty of the method multiplied by a coverage factor of 2 (k = 2), providing the coverage probability of approximately 95%.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Amino Acid Composition and Amino Acid Scores</title><p>The total AA content of the nine red macroalgae ranged from 66% to 99% of crude protein (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The AA analyzed represented both essential and non-essential amino acids. Among the eighteen detected AAs, the macroalgae samples contained ten EAAs, namely methionine (Met), leucine (Leu), lysine (Lys), phenylalanine (Phe), tyrosine (Tyr), isoleucine (Ile), threonine (Thr), valine (Val), histidine (His), cysteine (Cys), and eight non-EAAs which were found in all analyzed species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The non-EAAs, aspartic acid (Asp), glutamic acid (Glu), and arginine (Arg), constituted a substantial fraction of the total AAs (28% - 40%) in most of the nine species, while D. sanguinea, O. dentata, and P. rubens were also found to be rich in proline (Pro) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). In contrast, ornithine (Orn) was the non-EAA with the lowest concentration with maximum amounts of 2% of total AA in A. plicata. The ratio of EAA to non-EAA of the here studied algae was 0.7, except for F. lumbricalis, D. carnosa, D. sanguinea, where the ratio was 0.6.</p><p>The AA scores of the nine selected algae along with some animal and plant meals were calculated based on the most updated WHO/FAO/UNU AA requirement reference pattern for child school/adolescent (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref34">34</xref>] . The first limiting AA of the six species of red algae was histidine (A. plicata, D. sanguinea, F. lumbricalis, G. vermiculophylla, P. rubens, O. dentata), while for three other species, P. palmata, C. crispus, and D. carnosa, leucine was the first limiting AA, despite the fact that Leu was the EAA present at the highest concentration in two of these species. The AA scores Lys-Met+Cys and Lys-Met+Cys-Trp-Thr were significantly higher in all of the investigated nine algae than in the chosen reference protein (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Fatty Acid Composition</title><p>The fatty acid (FA) profiles of eight of the nine red algae were investigated in the present study. In total, 27 FAs were detected ranging from 12 in F. lumbricalis to all of the 27 identified FAs in D. sanguinea (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). More than half of the lipid was made up of unsaturated fatty acid (USFA) with a ω6/ω3 ratio ranging between 0.1 and 3.8. The health-beneficial Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; C20:5 n3) was found in all nine macroalgae ranging between 3.2% and 41.7% of total fatty acids (TFA), in G. vermiculophylla and P. palmata, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Another physiologically important long chain PUFA, Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; C22:6 n3), was absent in four of the red algae species studied, but present in D. sanguinea, A. plicata, C. crispus and P. rubens, showing contents from 0.6% to 3.7% of TFA. The highest alpha-linoleic acid (ALA; C18:3 n3) content of 3.8% of TFA was observed in D. sanguinea which is the only species in the present study that contained the Clupanodonic</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Amino acid score (AAS) of the first limiting Amino acid (AA) of plant and animals meals (Uhe et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref33">33</xref>] ; Misciattelli et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref34">34</xref>] ) along with the studied red algae (letters in the vertical axis designate algal species given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>); The data on each column represents the AA score as well as the first limiting AA of each food resource including all the nine algae investigated; amino acid score (%): based on FAO/WHO/UNU amino acid requirement reference pattern for school child/adolescent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref29">29</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2000590x8.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Amino acid concentration [% of total amino acids], amino acid scores (%), and essential amino acid index of the studied red algae</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Amino acids (% total AA)<sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Algal species<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Expanded uncertainty (%)<sup>3</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ap</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gv</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ds</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Od</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pr</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EAA:</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cystein<sup>5</sup>+Cystine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;9.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Histidine<sup>4</sup> (His)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;13.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lysine (Lys)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;5.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Threonine (Thr)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tyrosine<sup>5</sup> (Tyr)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;10.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Valine (Val)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;6.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isoleucine (Ile)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;8.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leucine (Leu)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;7.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Methionine (Met)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;7.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phenylalanine (Phe)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tryptophan (Trp)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EAA (% total AA)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total EAA (mg/g protein)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >268.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >307.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >251.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >291.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >349.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >299.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >287.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >313.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-EAA:</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arginine (Arg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;6.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspartic acid (Asp)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;5.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glutamic acid (Glu)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;4.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serine (Ser)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;5.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glycine (Gly)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;6.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ornithine (Orn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;5.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alanine (Ala)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;5.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proline (Pro)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#177;8.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total AA (% protein)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EAA/non-EAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AA score (%)<sup>5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lys-Met+Cys</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >229</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >213</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >249</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >229</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >233</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >247</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >243</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lys-Met+Cys-Trp-Thr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >348</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >306</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >361</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >434</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >348</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >315</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >359</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EAAI<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>Letters in parentheses are abbreviation of each AA; <sup>2</sup>Letters designate algal species given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>; AA: Amino acid; <sup>3</sup>n.d. not detected; EAA: essential amino acid; <sup>4</sup>Relative expanded uncertainty of each applied method reported based on a standard uncertainty of the method multiplied by a coverage factor of 2 (k = 2), providing the coverage probability of approximately 95%; <sup>5</sup>Essential AA for children; calculated as an essential AA: Tyrosin (can derive from Phenylalanine), Cystein (can from tyrosine and methionine); <sup>6</sup>AA score (%): based on WHO/FAO//UNU amino acid requirement reference pattern for school child/adolescent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref29">29</xref>] ; <sup>7</sup>EAAI: Essential amino acid index.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Total lipid and relative weight concentration [%] of Total Fatty Acids in studied red algae</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >Amino acids (% total AA)<sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Algal species<sup>2</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ap</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gv</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ds</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pr</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total lipid<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(% of dry matter)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Fatty acids composition<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C12:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lauric acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C13:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tridecanoic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C14:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Myristic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C14:1 n5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Myristolenic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C15:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pentadecanoic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C16:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palmitic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C16:1 n7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palmitol acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C17:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Margaric acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C17:1 n7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heptadecenoic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C18:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stearic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C18:1 n9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oleic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C18:1 n7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cis-vaccen acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C18:2 n6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Linoleic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C18:3 n6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gamma-linolenic acid (GLA)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C18:3 n3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >alpha-linoleic acid (ALA)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C18:4 n3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stearidonic acid (SDA)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arachidic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20:1 n11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gadolenic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20:1 n9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eicosenoic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20:2 n6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eicosadienoic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20:3 n6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20:4 n6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arachidonic acid (AA)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C20:5 n3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C22:0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Behenic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C22:1 n9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Erucic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C22:5 n3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clupanodonic acid (DPA)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C22:6 n3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not identified fatty acids</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ω3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ω6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ω9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ω6/ω3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>Letters designate algal species given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>; <sup>2</sup>n.d. not detected; <sup>3</sup>Lipid content and fatty acids composition of Odonthalia dentata (Od) was not detected due to insufficient sample volume; Relative Expanded uncertainty of each applied method reported based on a standard uncertainty of the method multiplied by a coverage factor of 2 (k = 2), providing the coverage probability of approximately 95%; Lipid: &#177;10%, and for individual FA: &#177;10%.</p><p>acid fatty acid (DPA; 0.3% of TFA). The arachidonic acid (AA; C20:4 n6) content varied from 4.7% to 28.2% of TFA.</p><p>Most of the examined species had approximately 90% of TFA as long chain FA (C15-C22). In contrast, the content of shorter chain FAs with C12-C14 carbon were generally low and varied between 1.5% of TFA in A. plicata to 9.9% of TFA in P. palmata. The FA composition of the herein analyzed macroalgae consisted of 21.2% - 49.6% saturated fatty acids (SFA), 7.8% - 23.9% of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), and 18.8% - 48.3% of PUFA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Except for F. lumbricalis, D. sanguinea and D. carnosa, it was found that unsaturated fatty acids contributed more than half of all the identified FA.</p><p>As represented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, the proportion of n-9-FA varied between 3.6% and 19.2% of TFAs in P. palmata and A. plicata, respectively. Furthermore, the studied red algae contained small amounts of n-7 as well as n-11 FAs.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Carotenoid Composition</title><p>All species contained β-carotene while lutein was not detected in G. vermiculophylla and zeaxanthin was not detected in F. lumbricalis, P. palmata, and D. carnosa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>The highest lutein content was found in P. rubens and F. lumbricalis with amounts of 15.2 and 13.3 mg∙kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of DM, respectively, while only 1.4 mg∙kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> was present in dry matter of O. dentata. Among the studied species, G. vermiculophylla was particularly rich in zeaxanthin; the concentration of this carotenoid was 9.3 mg∙kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of DM. Although zeaxanthin has been reported to be one of the common xanthophylls in red algae, it was not identified in several of the here studied red algae (F. lumbricalis, P. palmaria, and D. carnosa), while in the other species, the concentration was low, 0.9 - 4 mg∙kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of algal DM. Regarding β-carotene, P. rubens had the highest content (15.7 mg∙kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of DM), almost 45% more than G. vermiculophylla and F. lumbricalis, whereas P. palmata had the lowest content (1.9 mg∙kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> of DM) followed by O. dentata and A. plicata (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Identified saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (% of total fatty acid) of animal fats (L&#237;sa et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref131">131</xref>] ; Landim et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref132">132</xref>] ; Dillon et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref63">63</xref>] ), vegetable oils (Hoekman et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref133">133</xref>] ) and the studied red algae (letters in the vertical axis designate algal species given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2000590x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Carotenoid concentration (mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup> of dry matter (DM)) of the studied red algae (letters in the vertical axis designate algal species given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2000590x10.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Macro minerals, Trace Elements and Toxic Metals</title><p>All nine red algae contained high concentrations of essential macro minerals and trace elements (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). P. rubens had the highest concentration of Fe, Mg, Se, manganese (Mn), chromium (Cr) and molybdenum (Mo) of the nine algae. C. crispus had the highest concentrations of Ca and P. D. carnosa had the highest concentrations of Na and Zn, whereas the highest concentrations of K and Cu, were found in G. vermiculophylla and in D. sanguinea, respectively. Regarding the macronutrients, the N concentration ranged from 2.4% of DM in P. palmata to 4.9% in A. plicata, the P contents from 0.1% of DM in F. lumbricalis to 0.3% in C. crispus, and finally K from 1.3% of DM in D. carnosa to 4.9% in G. vermiculophylla (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Thus, not one species had the highest content of all three macronutrients. Three species contained more K than N: G. vermiculophylla, P. palmata and F. lumbricalis.</p><p>The Na contents of all the here studied algae were between 12 to 125 times below the Na content in table salt, and except for in D. carnosa, the Na/K ratios were below 1.0 in all the red algae studied (0.08 - 0.94), lowest in P. palmata. Other potentially important minerals for salt replacement blends, i.e. Ca and Zn, were also present in relatively high amounts (2.7 - 54 g Ca kg DM<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> and 16 - 112 mg Zn kg DM<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, respectively) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>C. crispus contained the highest concentrations of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) followed by P. rubens, as compared to the other species here investigated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)). Regarding total As, C. crispus, D. carnosa and A. plicata contained approximately twice as high concentrations as the remaining six species (Fig- ure 4(c)). There were no significant correlations between the tissue content of lipids or N (crude protein) in the nine red algae and any of the toxic metals.</p><p>Generally, carbohydrate content was inversely correlated to the contents of crude protein and ash (P = 0.029 and 0.002, respectively), and also to the contents of Mg, Cr and Pb (P = 0.024, 0.047 and 0.032, respectively). The ash concentrations were positively correlated to the concentrations of Mg, Mo, S and Pb (P = 0.031, 0.034, 0.013 and 0.049, respectively). The concentration of K was positively correlated to the carbohydrate content (P = 0.036), and inverse correlated to the content of N (crude protein) (P = 0.002).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Protein and Amino Acids</title><p>The protein content of both of the benchmark species, P. palmata and C. crispus, were lower than described from other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref35">35</xref>] with most typical values being around 20% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref36">36</xref>] . However, the variation seems</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Content of dry matter (DM), total ash, minerals and essential trace metals for human nutrition of the studied red algae. Contents of DM are given as % of fresh weight (FW), the contents of total minerals (ash), carbon, nitrogen and sulphur are given as % of DM, remaining minerals and trace metals are given as mg 100 g DM<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> (with the exception of selenium (Se) and molybdenum (Mo) where concentrations are given as &#181;g 100 g DM<sup>−1</sup>), and finally, the Na/K ratio of dry matter of the studied red algae as well as the recommended daily intake for adults (RDI) are given in mg day<sup>−1</sup> of minerals and trace metals. The highest concentrations of any specific mineral found among the nine macroalgae are marked in bold. Values are given as average &#177; SE, n = 3. Concentrations of minerals in vegetables/fruits as well as terrestrial and aquatic animals are given as mg 100 g fresh weight<sup>−1</sup>, again with the exception of selenium (Se) and molybdenum (Mo) where concentrations are given as &#181;g 100 g fresh weight<sup>−1</sup></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >RDI<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Algal species<sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Vegetables and fruits<sup>3</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Terrestrial &amp; aquatic animals<sup>4</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ap</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gv</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ds</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Od</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pr</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry matter content (% of FW)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total mineral content (% of DM)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Macro minerals<sup>5</sup> (% of DM)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon (C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.6 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.7 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 &#177; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.5 &#177; 0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.1 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.2 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.7 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.5 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 &#177; 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrogen (N)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sulphur (S)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minerals/trace metals<sup>5</sup> (mg 100 g DM<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sodium (Na)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >613 &#177; 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1017 &#177; 67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1889 &#177; 69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3059 &#177; 263</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >319 &#177; 21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1261 &#177; 551</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3311 &#177; 291</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >824 &#177; 55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >837 &#177; 82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04 - 227</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74 - 394</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potassium (K)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2001 &#177; 163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4912 &#177; 224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3478 &#177; 243</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3256 &#177; 307</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4111 &#177; 246</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1939 &#177; 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1304 &#177; 57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2659 &#177; 114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1363 &#177; 59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 730</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219 - 368</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium (Ca)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1151 &#177; 220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >401 &#177; 106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1347 &#177; 284</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5398 &#177; 335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >933 &#177; 118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1730 &#177; 178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >267 &#177; 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1382 &#177; 278</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4573 &#177; 1025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7 - 600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 - 68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron (Fe)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.3 &#177; 8.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.2 &#177; 1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.9 &#177; 2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.8 &#177; 15.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.7 &#177; 2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.3 &#177; 9.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.6 &#177; 3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.1 &#177; 12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13 - 3.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 - 3.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorus (P)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >700</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >246 &#177; 13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109 &#177; 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84 &#177; 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >289 &#177; 26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >272 &#177; 18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >204 &#177; 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2 - 437</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176 - 231</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium (Mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >346 &#177; 18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >314 &#177; 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >663 &#177; 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >930 &#177; 81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160 &#177; 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >370 &#177; 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >424 &#177; 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342 &#177; 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1265 &#177; 51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5 - 191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zink (Zn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 - 11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61 - 11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Selenium (Se)<sup>6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 &#177; 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61 &#177; 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 &#177; 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.d.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 - 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 - 43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper (Cu)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51 &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49 &#177; 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81 &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93 &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.004 - 0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06 - 0.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Manganese (Mn)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.7 &#177; 2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.2 &#177; 1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.4 &#177; 16.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.3 &#177; 12.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.8 &#177; 4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.2 &#177; 150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.9 &#177; 4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139.2 &#177; 18.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 - 0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 - 0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chrome (Cr)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11 &#177; 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12 &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20 &#177; 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Molybdenum (Mo)<sup>6</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 &#177; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 &#177; 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 &#177; 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66 &#177; 16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 &#177; 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 &#177; 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 &#177; 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79 &#177; 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102 &#177; 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001 - 150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na/K ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>Letters designate algal species given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>; <sup>2</sup>Sundhedsministeriet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref97">97</xref>] ; <sup>3</sup>Mart&#237;nez-Ballesta [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref92">92</xref>] ; <sup>4</sup>Tacon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref14">14</xref>] ; <sup>5</sup>Letters in parentheses are the elemental symbols of each mineral; <sup>6</sup>Concentrations of selenium and molybdenum are given in &#181;g 100 g DM<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> for the algae and &#181;g 100 g for fruits/vegetables and animals; n.d. not detected.</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Concentrations of critical heavy metals in the dry tissue of the nine red algae, in relation to relevant limit values for use in food, feed and soil improvement (&#181;g g DM<sup>−1</sup> (ppm)). (a) Total arsenic; (b) Cadmium; (c) Lead. Values represent average &#177; SE (n = 3). Solid horizontal lines indicate limit values of the three metals in food, feed and sludge for soil improvement as given by legal authorities in Spain, France, EU, USA, Denmark and Australia/New Zealand. Lines marked with * refer to limit values for inorganic arsenic. The values derive from Almela et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref101">101</xref>] : Spain (food), USA (food, inorganic As), France (food), Australia/New Zealand (food). EU [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref100">100</xref>] : EU (feed). Holdt and Kraan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] : EU (food), USA (food, Pb)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2000590x11.png"/></fig><p>well within the range to be expected based on geographical and seasonal differences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref38">38</xref>] . For instance, investigation on seasonal variation of protein content from P. palmata revealed the highest content during the winter-spring period (22% of DM), while it turned out to be nearly half of this during the summer-autumn period (12% of DM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref7">7</xref>] . The relatively low content of protein in the algae as compared to other studies can be explained by the same reasons as those causing the high content of carbohydrates: the low availability of nutrients and high insolation in summer in Danish inner waters.</p><p>Generally, the total AA content of each macroalgae was lower than its crude protein content (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). In this study, the total AA concentration ranged from 66% to 99% of crude protein which implied low amounts of the organic non-protein nitrogenous materials, such as free amino acids and chlorophylls, in these algae. A. plicata, P. palmata, and O. dentata stand out as having a high amount of Lys which is comparable with the Lys content in soya and egg (6.1% and 7% TAA, respectively) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref7">7</xref>] . Because of the nutritional value of Lys, this AA has received much attention as the most likely limiting AA in cereal proteins. Lys is increasingly used as an AA additive in animal feed particularly for poultry and pigs, to obtain a well-balanced protein feed with minimal surplus of nitrogen. Leu was the major component of EAAs in the remaining six species investigated in the present study.</p><p>Evidence about human and animal diet shows that stimulation of muscle protein synthesis would be optimized with sufficiently high dosage of Leu (2.5 g at each of three meals day<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) in the presence of adequate dietary energy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref39">39</xref>] . The AA of most of the species were on the other hand characterized as being deficient in His followed by Tyr and Met (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), which is in accordance with data reported by Galland-Irmouli et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref7">7</xref>] and Mouritsen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref36">36</xref>] for P. palmata. It is noteworthy that although the Met content of the nine selected algae was among the three EAAs of the lowest concentrations, the Met content of the red algae proteins is still comparable with the Met content of plant-derived proteins, especially those derived from legumes or nuts, which range from 0.85% to 2.3% of the protein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref40">40</xref>] .</p><p>The large content of non-EAA, in particular Glu and Asp, potentially provide the macroalgae with a strong umami flavor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref41">41</xref>] , making them attractive components for flavoring food as well as components with a number of possible effects in relation to nutrition and health e.g. appetite stimulation in elderly individuals or other dietetic purposes. In addition, as listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, the nine red macroalgae also contain the sweet flavor proline (Pro), serine (Ser), and alanine (Ala) as well as bitter AA, such as Ile and Val, which enrich the algae species with a complex taste [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref42">42</xref>] .</p><p>In this study, the AA scores of the red algae were relatively high and ranged from 44% to 92%. Although A. plicata contained the highest protein content after P. rubens (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), it demonstrated the lowest AA score. Moreover, some of the studied algal species such as P. rubens, P. palmata, and O. dentata obtained a considerably higher AA score than is typically found in vegetable and/or animal meals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref44">44</xref>] ; this suggests that these marine photosynthetic organisms can be a valuable source of AA. On the other hand, the algal AA scores did not exceed the scores of high quality protein sources such as milk, soya, and fish meal. The AA scores Lys-Met+Cys and Lys-Met+Cys-Trp-Thr are high in all the investigated algae (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Since the first limiting AA for adults in nearly all foods (e.g. legumes) is generally Met+Cys, and in cereal grains Lys (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), the AA contents of the given algae could be considered complementary to these plant proteins, calling attention to the potentials of mixed proteins. Apart from Lys and Met+Cys, two sulphur containing AA, Trp and Thr, have generally been reported to be present at a low level in the protein consumed in a typical human diet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref45">45</xref>] . Therefore, despite that Trp was not analyzed in the nine red algae, the high content of the Lys-Met+Cys-Trp-Thr score indicated a well-balanced protein quality. Moreover, all the red algae studied had high amount of EAAI (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). All algae showed the maximum score of 100, with the exception of A. plicata, F. lumbricalis, and D. carnosa, which showed EAAI scores between 85 and 91.</p><p>In the light of the decline in the world fish population as well as the drawbacks associated with plant-derived proteins, the use of selected algae analyzed in this work in the development of nutritive supplementary diet for human and animal feed may be applicable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref46">46</xref>] .</p><p>Different methods have been discussed to estimate the average protein requirement for the human body [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref47">47</xref>] . Based on the analysis of available nitrogen balance studies, the average daily intake of protein to meet the body need is approximately 0.8 g of good quality protein kg<sup>−1</sup> body weight of men and women. Regarding livestock animals such as pigs, turkeys, and broilers approximately 165, 260, and 210 g of crude protein per kg of dry feed is required in their growing life stage, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref48">48</xref>] . Moreover, fish diets typically contain between 20% and 55% crude protein depending on the fish species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref49">49</xref>] . Sources of plant and/or animal-derived proteins for humans and animals (e.g. as functional food and fish feed) are various: corn (9.4 g/100g of DM), wheat (10.7 g/100g of DM), peas (2.8 g/100g of DM), almond (21.15 g/100g of DM), soybean (36.4 g/100g of DM), salmon (22.6 g/100g of DM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref50">50</xref>] . Fishmeal usually contains 65% of crude protein, but the protein content can vary from 57% to 77%, depending on the species of fish processed into fishmeal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref51">51</xref>] . However, recent decline in availability of commercial aquaculture feed as well as difficulties in plant cultivation limited some applications in the food and feed trade. On the other hand, significant increases in global demand for livestock products will require increasing amounts of feed protein supplies and alternatives sources will need to be continually reviewed. With respect to the relatively low crude protein content of the studied macroalgae, they seem more potent as alternative plant protein supplement sources for humans and animals than as a stable food source such as chicken or peas. As a mixed protein source they can also improve the nutritional quality.</p><p>With respect to the human diet, the recent AA requirement pattern [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref29">29</xref>] reported the total EAA content for schoolchild/adolescent of 291 mg∙g<sup>−1</sup> protein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref52">52</xref>] . As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, total EAA content varied from 251 to nearly 409 mg∙g<sup>−1</sup> protein. Consequently with respect to the reference pattern, all the algae studied seemed to be able to contribute adequate levels of total EAA either individually or mixed in an appropriate portion with each other (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). However, the nutritional values of macroalgae obtained here are based on chemical analysis only. Hence, biological evaluation using human and animal diet studies would be required to establish the actual nutritional value of these macroalgae.</p><p>In general, marine macroalgae could be a potential source for human and particularly animal nutrition such as pig, chicken, oyster, salmon or trout, all of great commercial interest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref49">49</xref>] . AAs are by far the largest feed additive group and their market segment is expected to reach $18.8 billion by 2017, up from $9.6 billion in 2010 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref53">53</xref>] .</p><p>For promoting growth and health of fish, the content of EAA is one of the principal factors in dietary nutrition and the proportion of each EAA in formulated feed can change based on different factors such as species variety [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref55">55</xref>] . Hence, the presented nine red algae species could be useful in developing nutrient-balanced, cost-effective research diets, and practical feeds for different cultivated fish.</p><p>Results like those obtained from this study, are needed in order to determine how to blend different algae species in various proportions to achieve the required level of AA in the formulated diet for specific human age groups and/or the candidate species proposed to be cultivated. However, although the use of the studied algal proteins in animal and human diets seems to be a promising way for utilizing these under-exploited marine resources, the digestibility of algal protein should be investigated in the future. Few investigated the in vivo digestibility of macroalgae proteins and available studies about their assimilation by human have not provided conclusive results. The protein digestibility seems to be limited by the algal non-protein fraction (i.e. phenolic compounds and polysaccharides) and high rate of red macroalgae protein degradation in vitro have been reported when using digestive proteolytic enzymes (i.e. pepsin, pancreatin, and pronase) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref11">11</xref>] . As the red algae generally possess low levels of phenols and high protein content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref56">56</xref>] , the probability of high digestibility in the studied red algae could though be expected.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Lipids and Fatty Acids</title><p>The total lipid content of the present macroalgae was low (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). These results are lower than lipid contents reported for both of the “bench mark species” in the literature: P. palmata 3.8% of DM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref9">9</xref>] and C. crispus 3% of DM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref57">57</xref>] , but similar to those determined by Kumari et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref58">58</xref>] for A. plicata (1.4% of DM). The variations in lipid content in different macroalgae were attributed either to the species, seasonal variation or environmental factors or a combination. Generally, the lipid content of seaweeds is low, less than 5% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] . The ACA content of A. plicata in the present study (28.2% TFA) was lower than that reported by Kumari et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref58">58</xref>] for the same species from Kotuda, Japan (34.1% of TFA), while the herein reported content of 15.5% in C. crispus is in agreement with values reported by Fleurence et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref59">59</xref>] and van Ginneken et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref60">60</xref>] .</p><p>In general, it should be mentioned that the FA composition of the examined algae demonstrated the pattern distinct for the red algae with relatively higher levels of palmitic acid (C16:0), oleic acid (C18:1 n9), ACA and EPA. These fatty acids together accounted for 44.5% - 79.6% of TFA, whereas C18 PUFAs were present as minor components only, with ranges between 1.3% of TFA in F. lumbricalis to 12.5% of TFA in G. vermiculophylla. The present findings are therefore in accordance with data reported by Kumari et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref58">58</xref>] , in which among 13 red algae, 12 of them had a low content of C18 PUFA. Comparison of the SFA and USFA contents of A. plicata, C. crispus and P. palmata determined in the present study were relatively similar to those reported in the literature for the same species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref61">61</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref62">62</xref>] . Among the unsaturated fatty acids, the content of MUFAs in almost all of the species was lower than the content of PUFAs. However, palmitoleic acid (C16:1 n7) and oleic acid were the predominant MUFAs and varied between 3.6% of TFA in P. palmata to 20.6% of TFA in A. plicata.</p><p>Most of the here studied red algae species such as A. plicata, P. palmata, G. vermiculophylla, and C. crispus contain approximately the same level of PUFAs as is seen in fish oil and considerably higher level of PUFAs than is typically found in vegetable oils and animal fats. The ω6/ω3 ratios were ranging between 0.1 and 3.8 which is also comparable with ω6/ω3 of fish oil (approximately 0.2) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref63">63</xref>] . P. palmata had the lowest ω6/ω3 ratio due to its high content of EPA. This suggests that these marine photosynthetic organisms can be a source of dietary PUFAs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), thus making use of these seaweeds for consumption or as a functional food or feed ingredient may contribute significantly and be an improvement of the dietary supply of the same quality as fish oil.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Carbohydrate</title><p>The P. palmata carbohydrate content (71% of DM) found in this study is in the high end of the range reported for this species in other studies (38% - 74% of DM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref64">64</xref>] . The carbohydrates of Palmariales are described as water soluble xylans, most likely storage compounds, but with a potential role in structural components [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref23">23</xref>] , and there is no present commercial exploitation of carbohydrates from Palmariales. The carbohydrate concentration of C. crispus (53.3% of DM) most likely reflects a high content of carrageenan, as C. crispus cultivated or harvested from Denmark has been found to have a high content (up to 47% of DM) as well as a high quality of carrageenan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref65">65</xref>] . In G. vermiculophylla the 61.9% carbohydrate of DM indicates a high content of agar. G. vermiculophylla is an invasive species in Europe, where it successfully spreads in shallow estuaries.</p><p>Carbohydrate content varies depending on the nutritional status of the algal cell, seasonal and geographical variations, light in particular, generally with accumulation of carbohydrates under high light conditions, and an inverse correlation between N availability and carbohydrate content exists [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref65">65</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref69">69</xref>] . The algae in this study were all harvested in the Danish summer period with maximal light as well as potential nutrient limitation in the inner Danish waters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref70">70</xref>] . Thus the high carbohydrate contents, between 50% and 75% of the DM, in all studied species except for P. rubens (40.2% of DM), appear to reflect the environmental conditions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The relatively low content of carbohydrate in P. rubens also as compared to D. sanguinea, a species belonging to the same genera and sharing the same habitat was counterbalanced by a relatively high protein content.</p><p>The carbohydrate content of the algae species analyzed in this study supports the expectations of high content of hydrocolloids in the already exploited red algae species and point to a potential for a broader commercial exploitation of these species in the North Atlantic region.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Carotenoid Composition</title><p>In this study, the concentration of lutein was significantly lower than previously described for in P. palmata (240 mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup> of DM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref71">71</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref74">74</xref>] and F. lumbricalis (32.8 mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup> of DM). β-carotene is also previously reported in P. rubens, D. sanguinea, and C. crispus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref75">75</xref>] . As a consequence of the protective function of carotenoids in red algae, accumulation of carotenoids is favored by light, potentially explaining the high β-carotene content in P. palmata (420 mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup> of DM) in summer as compared to winter(37 mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup> of DM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] . β-carotene has an estimated market value of around $250 million in 2007 and $261 million in 2010 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref76">76</xref>] . Natural β-carotene consists of an attractive mixture of trans and cis isomers, which can be difficult to obtain by chemical synthesis.</p><p>Zeaxanthin and lutein are interesting carotenoids with regard to human and animal diet. These compounds are also used in the cosmetic industry as well as in the feed industry for poultry, pigs, and fish [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref77">77</xref>] . Moreover, recent studies have shown that a diet rich in these two carotenoids diminished the risk of ophthalmological diseases in human [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref76">76</xref>] .</p><p>Common dietary source of carotenoids are colored fruits and vegetables; e.g. spinach is a source of lutein and β-carotene (62.6 and 44.9 mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup> FW, respectively) while carrot and mango have high content of β-carotene (79.7 and 31 mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup> FW, respectively) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref78">78</xref>] . Although fruits and vegetables represent the main part of human carotenoid intake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref18">18</xref>] , considering the total identified carotenoids in this study, P. rubens contained the highest content of carotenoids of nearly 186.1 mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup> of DM followed by C. crispus and G. vermiculophylla while P. palmata and A. plicata reached the two lowest levels among the other red macroalgae.</p><p>Regarding the animal diet, the required amount of carotenoids can be related to various factors (e.g. species cultivars, diet ingredients, gender, water quality, and seasonal variation). For instance, according to Torrissen and Christiansen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref79">79</xref>] , carotenoids (canthaxanthin and/or astaxanthin) should be added at a level above 10 mg/kg of dried fish feed to ensure the well-being of the animal. Regarding the poultry feed, the maximum carotenoids concentration should be set to about 80 mg/kg of feed for all xanthophylls except canthaxanthin, for which a maximum amount of only 8 mg/kg is allowed for laying hens and 25 mg/kg for other poultry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref80">80</xref>] .</p><p>Therefore, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, these studied algae represent a relatively high potential to be considered as a direct or as supplementary carotenoid source in human or animal diets in particular in regions where suitable vegetable production or consumption is low. Further cultivation under controlled environmental conditions will have the potential to increase and optimize the content of carotenoids in red algae.</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Dry Matter, Minerals and Metals</title><p>The red algae investigated had a relatively high DM content. The DM content of P. palmate and C. crispus (29 and 24% of FW) has been reported by other authors to be in the same range [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref81">81</xref>] .</p><p>The ash contents of the nine algae were within the range of ash contents reported from non-coralline red algae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref82">82</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref84">84</xref>] . The ash concentration found in P. palmata was in the lower end of reported values for this species: from 12% of DM to 37% of DM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref9">9</xref>] , having in this respect the largest similarity with material harvested in July from the Irish Sea (11.7% of DM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref9">9</xref>] . Comparing the here reported ash contents to the ash contents of the same species harvested on Iceland, also in the summer, some species have slightly lower ash contents: A. plicata (13% versus 30% - 39%), D. sanguinea (22.5% versus 26.2%), D. carnosa (22.6% versus 36%) while other are higher: P. rubens (29.1% versus 28.2%), O. dentata (30.3% versus 21.0%) and some are in the same range: C. crispus (25.1% versus 23% - 35%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref82">82</xref>] . Ruperez [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref21">21</xref>] , Ruperez and Toledano [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref83">83</xref>] and Pereira and van de Velde [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref85">85</xref>] reported an ash content of 21% of DM for C. crispus which is slightly lower than found here in this species (25% of DM). The ash content depends on the algae species and morphology, but also there is a considerable within-species variation in ash content relating to temporal and spatial factors: The temporal variation reflects responses in growth strategy to availability of light and nutrients, i.e. ash content is inversely correlated to irradiance, but directly correlated to N availability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref86">86</xref>] . Thus, the ash contents of the here analyzed red algae were expected to be low, since they were sampled in late summer with relatively high insolation and low nutrient availability in inner Danish waters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref87">87</xref>] .</p><p>The ash content is inversely correlated to the calorific value of the algae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref88">88</xref>] . Thus, the high ash content will act disqualifying in any application of the seaweed biomass with sheer focus on energy, both viewed in a metabolic as well as in a biofuel perspective [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref69">69</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref89">89</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref90">90</xref>] . However, ash is the mineral residue of organic matter, and minerals are essential for any production of new biomass from agricultural crops to human and livestock animals. Further, the ash from marine seaweeds contain higher amounts of both macro minerals (i.e. Mg, Na, K, Ca) and trace metals (i.e. Fe, Cu, Zn) than those reported for edible land plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref91">91</xref>] . In this respect, the value of the mineral fraction will have to be evaluated against the requirements of each specific target organism.</p><p>The nine red algae had high concentrations of essential macro minerals and trace elements. Overall, between 1 and 89 g of dry algae would support the recommended daily mineral intake of human adults if choosing the algae with the highest content of the specific mineral. The only exception is P, where meeting the full daily requirements would require 249 g of C. crispus. Compared to the mineral contents of the conventional human food sources: vegetables, fruits and meat from aquatic or terrestrial animals (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>), it is important to keep in mind, that where the values for the conventional food sources are given per 100 g of FW, the values of the algae are given per 100 g of DM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref92">92</xref>] . The DM content of the algae varied between 18% and 43% of FW (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Accordingly, the mineral concentrations of the fresh algae would be between 2.5 and 5 fold lower than for the dry algae. Taking this into consideration, the mineral contents of the nine red algae are still higher than or as high as the mineral content of the conventional food sources having the highest content of any specific mineral, P being an exception. In particular, the contents of Ca, Fe, Mn and Cr, are higher in the algae as compared to fruits, vegetables and meats.</p><p>Minerals are as essential as to animals as they are to humans and adequate mineral supplement to livestock animals is crucial, in order to have a profitable and efficient farm operation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref93">93</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref94">94</xref>] . The nine red algae, in particular P. rubens, represent rich sources of essential macro minerals and trace elements. The whole algae, or minerals recovered from process streams in simple or complex biorefineries, could constitute mineral supplements, alone or in mixtures, for human food as well as for animal feed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref95">95</xref>] . However, for food and feed safety, attention must also be directed to the potentially harmful metals. This will be discussed in Section 4.3.</p><p>Macroalgae are found to increase saltiness, umami and enhance flavor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref41">41</xref>] . Macroalgae represent a rich source of natural macro minerals and flavor components with a potential for use in sodium replacement strategies. The recommended Na allowances for adults are around 1000 - 1300 mg day<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref96">96</xref>] while the daily recommended adult intake is 800 mg day<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref96">96</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref97">97</xref>] . The average daily sodium intake however, exceeds the recommended level by 2 - 6 times particularly in USA, Canada and Europe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref98">98</xref>] . Because the sodium intake and the Na/K ratio of diets are causally related to hypertension, an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease, there is serious attention towards reducing intake of sodium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref99">99</xref>] . Na is the main component of salt and estimated seventy-five percent of Na intake is derived from processed food. The Na contents of all the here studied algae were 10 to 100 fold lower than the Na content in table salt and, except for D. carnosa, the Na/K ratios were below 1.0 in all the red algae studied, in some species down to 0.08. For comparison, the Na/K ratios in olives and sausages are 43.63 and 4.89, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref99">99</xref>] .</p><p>Salt in food not only provide the salty taste, it is also added for functionality, preservative and as processing aid. Sodium can be replaced with K and blends of other mineral salts like Mn, Ca, and Zn, however, all have less salty taste than Na and have bitter notes. Other potentially important minerals for salt replacement blends, like Ca and Zn, were also present in the investigated red algae in relatively high amounts (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>), thus further improving the potential of using algae minerals for salt replacements.</p><p>Today several seaweed species are included in commercial Na salt reducing blends i.e. two brown macroalgae of the order Laminariales and the red macroalgae P. palmata, which also in this study had the lowest Na/K ratio. G. vermiculophylla, A. plicata and O. dentata and all have Na/K ratios below 0.5, and as A. plicata as well as Gracilaria species already are commercially processed for production of hydrocollois (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), these results points to the potential of refining an additional value product from the residues of the processed biomass of these species.</p><p>Arsenic, Cd and Pb are elements with strict regulations in legislation regarding food and feed. However, the legislations of different countries are not consistent regarding limit values of heavy metals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref100">100</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref102">102</xref>] . The concentrations of Cd and Pb in C. crispus and P. rubens were above limit values for use in food according to legislation in France and Australia/New Zealand (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)). According to French legislation on Cd concentration, all other species would be allowed for food, whereas in Australia/New Zealand the Cd concentrations of D. sanguinea and D. carnosa would exclude also these two species from use in food. Where Spanish food legislation with a limit value of 5 ppm of Pb would allow use of all species in food with the exception of C. crispus and P. rubens, only G. vermiculophylla would be allowed for food in France, where Pb limit value is 1 ppm.</p><p>All of the nine algae could be applied for production of animal feed according to EU directions. In the EU food regulative, no limit values are set for total As concentrations, but only for the concentration of inorganic As compounds in the algae, which are known to be harmful to humans and other animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref101">101</xref>] . This is also the case for the food legislation in USA, France and Australia/New Zealand, whereas no limit values are set for neither total nor inorganic As in the EU food regulations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Depending on processing and national legislation, the content of specific toxic metals, As, Pb and Cd may become problematic in food and feed applications. However in a biorefinery, each process streams need to be analyzed separately to keep track of metals.</p><p>Although temporal and spatial differences have influence on the concentrations of metals in macroalgae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref90">90</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref103">103</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref104">104</xref>] , the differences in heavy metal concentration of the nine Danish red algae investigated here could not be caused by temporal or spatial variation, since all algae specimens are collected at the same time, and, apart from the G. vermiculophylla, also from the same marine area.</p><p>Generally, red algae are considered to contain more As than green algae, but not as much as most brown algae, of which some, e.g. the Hizikia sp., contain very high concentrations of As (up to 141 ppm) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] . Red algae have been shown to contain higher proportion of water soluble inorganic As, as compared to green and brown algae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref105">105</xref>] . The As values of C. crispus reported here are slightly higher than reported from Spain (12.7 and 16.1 ppm) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref101">101</xref>] . On the contrary, the concentrations of total As in the Danish P. palmata was lower (4.7 ppm) as compared to the 7.6 and 12.8 ppm reported in the review by Holdt and Kraan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] , or 12.6 and 13.0 ppm as reported by Almela et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref101">101</xref>] .</p><p>Regarding lead (Pb), the value measured for the here studied P. palmata (1.1 ppm) was lower than or equal to values from Japan as reported by Holdt and Kraan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] (1.1 ppm) and Almela et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref101">101</xref>] (1.52 ppm), while for C. crispus, the Pb content measured in this study was approximately a factor of 10 higher (6.4 ppm) than for the same species from Spain (0.4 and 0.7 ppm). On the other hand, a Pb concentration in the same range as what was measured in this study was reported for C. crispus from an unpolluted site in Canada (4.6 ppm), whereas at a polluted site in Canada, the Pb concentration in C. crispus was as high as 33.1 ppm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref103">103</xref>] . When it comes to Cd, the concentrations measured in the Danish C. crispus and P. palmata were in range with what is reported in the literature: the Danish C. crispus contained 0.5 ppm of Cd as compared to 0.4 and 0.7 ppm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref101">101</xref>] , and 0.5 to 2.4 ppm in Chondrus from Canada, depending on the degree of pollution (Sharp et al., 1988). The Danish P. palmata contained 0.14 ppm of Cd which is relatively low compared to values reported: 0.70 ppm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref2">2</xref>] , 0.15 ppm (Japan) and 0.88 ppm (Spain) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref101">101</xref>] and 1.49 ppm (Canada) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref103">103</xref>] .</p><p>Regarding other heavy metals, chromium (Cr), Cu and Zn, it is noteworthy that none of these concentrations were above limit values of any regulations. The values measured in Danish C. crispus were in range with values reported from Canadian Chondrus, whereas the value for Nickel (Ni) was approximately twice as high in the Danish Chondrus as compared to the Canadian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref103">103</xref>] . The concentrations of Cu and Zn were lower in the Danish Palmaria, than in Palmaria reported from Canada: Cu 3.3 ppm and Zn 81.5 ppm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref103">103</xref>] . Regarding the other species analyzed, the contents of heavy metal were in the same range as described for P. palmata and C. crispus, apart from a higher content of Cu in D. sanguinea, the highest contents of Zn in D. carnosa and the highest content of Cr in P. rubens.</p></sec><sec id="s4_6"><title>4.6. Commercial Perspectives</title><p>The nine North Atlantic red algae described in this study are potential future sources of carotenoids, lipids with a low ω6:ω3 ratio, essential amino acids and different carbohydrates, some with interesting technical and/or bioactive properties. However, there are a number of barriers to overcome in order to commercially exploit macroalgae species, such as these nine species: 1) Stabile and adequate biomass supply, 2) Construction of optimal biorefinery processes and 3) Legislation on novel foods.</p><p>Biomass supply: The open sea production of macroalgae is expanding, in particular regarding the large brown algae, the Laminariales [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref106">106</xref>] . The nine red algae here are all relatively small and slow growing macroalgae (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), and this may become problematic in supplying biomass in volumes required for industrial exploitation. Some of the species occupying the tidal zone and the shallow waters are already being cultivated (Gracilaria sp.) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref16">16</xref>] or harvested from natural resources for hydrocolloid production, i.e. A. plicata in Russia and Chile [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref107">107</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref108">108</xref>] , F. lumbricalis in Estonia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref109">109</xref>] and beach cast Chondrus in Nova Scotia and Spain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref110">110</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref111">111</xref>] . P. palmata (dulse) is harvested for food purposes, and cultivation attempts are also emerging in land based tanks as well as in open sea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref86">86</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref112">112</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref114">114</xref>] . However, the species preferring the deeper waters such as P. rubens, D. sanguinea, D. carnosa and O. dentata would be more difficult to access for harvest, but could candidate for tank cultivation. Tank cultivation is more resource demanding, but implies control of environmental parameters, controlling growth. This opens for the potential of optimizing the tissue content of specific compounds of interest through control of environmental conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref115">115</xref>] . Algae cultivated in tanks may well receive their nutrients from bioremediation of nutrient rich waste streams from land-based aquaculture, agriculture or energy production, improving sustainability as well as economy of the concept, without compromising food or feed safety [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref116">116</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref120">120</xref>] . The question of producing sufficient biomass at the right price is always a question of demand and market prices. The annual production of 60.000 dry tons of nori at a value of US$ 1.5 billion alone in Japan (1994/1995) based on open sea cultivation of a relatively small red algae with a highly complex lifecycle (Porphyra sp.) is an encouraging example of a high demand making a complex production feasible [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref106">106</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref121">121</xref>] .</p><p>Biorefinery processes: The construction of biorefinery processes for optimal biomass utilization, maximal sustainability and economic yield is in focus regarding all types of biomass, including macroalgae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref122">122</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref124">124</xref>] . Macroalgae are described as an untapped resource for production of fuels, chemicals, and novel potential high value compounds and processes for their exploitation are emerging [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref125">125</xref>] , e.g. specific enzymes with the capability to function at high salinity are developed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref126">126</xref>] . In macroalgae, such as these nine North Atlantic red algae, compounds of interest may be selectively extracted from the biomass, or they may be left in a residual biomass after extraction of other high or low value compounds, i.e. a concentrated protein and mineral residue will be left after removal of carbohydrates by hydrolysis and fermentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref124">124</xref>] . The necessity of separating biomass components calls for developments in process technology in order to selectively extract attractive components alone, in sequence or together, as well as to avoid unwanted components such as toxic metals in specific process streams. No significant correlations between the lipid content and the concentrations of toxic metals known to accumulate in fat (Pb and Cd) was found in the here investigated algae. We also found no significant positive correlations between toxic metals and content of carbohydrate, despite that the sulphate, hydroxyl and carboxyl groups of the algae polysaccharides are strong ion-exchangers, and thus important complexation sites for metal cations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref127">127</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref128">128</xref>] . The content of Pb, and other metals, Mg and Cr, was negatively correlated to the content of carbohydrate, potentially as a consequence of the negative correlation between carbohydrate concentrations and ash content (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Contents of ash and protein are negatively correlated to carbohydrate content, due to the seasonally fluctuating nature of the carbohydrate pool with light [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref66">66</xref>] .</p><p>The correlations described between major biomass components; proteins, ash and carbohydrate, and specific minerals may not necessarily be predictive for what minerals will follow what components in a biorefinery process. The bindings between minerals and protein/carbohydrates in algae are of various nature, and although they may not be uncoupled in mechanic pretreatments, such as milling and air classification as is used for separating starch and protein in legumes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref129">129</xref>] , they may be cleaved by hydrolysis in thermal, pH or enzymatic pre-treatments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref127">127</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref128">128</xref>] . From this it follows, as an example, that depending on the processes, and sequences of processes applied in a biorefinery, a content of toxic metals above limit values in the initial biomass would not pose a problem for food or feed application of the protein fraction, if the toxic metals could be separated from the high value or protein fraction in one of the early processes. The knowledge of the correlations and the properties of bindings between minerals and biomass components is important in construction of a biorefinery, and also in seeking to increase or decrease the content of specific minerals in the initial biomass in developing cultivation and harvest strategies for specific algae species in tanks on land or in open water scenarios.</p><p>Legislation on novel foods: At present however, commercial use of unrefined seaweed products for food are restricted by regulatory terms. Generally, novel foods and food ingredients consisting of isolates from either microorganisms and fungi or algae are under the so-called novel food regulation. The 1997 regulation (EC) No 258/97 stipulates that new foods that have not been marketed in the EU before May 1997 must be pre-approved. Food or ingredients are considered new (and therefore as novel food) if they have not been used for human consumption to a significant degree in the EU before May 1997. Today twenty species of edible seaweeds are recognized by Europe as being safe for human consumption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref130">130</xref>] . P. palmata was used only in food supplements before 15 May 1997 and therefore any other food use of this seaweed has to be authorized pursuant according to the EU Novel Food regulation. Furthermore, all other red seaweeds in this study are considered as Novel Food in the EU and require authorization for use in food applications.</p><p>The success of feasible exploitation of small and relatively slow growing macroalgae, as these nine species, depends on how barriers such as biomass production, biorefinery construction and legislation are addressed and overcome. Tank cultivation could be a way of optimizing growth rates and biomass composition.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The species investigated constitute a potential source of health promoting additives for human and animal diets and may be attractive for the food industry as a source of ingredients with high nutritional value. They can provide a dietary alternative to common fruits and vegetables due to their nutritional value. In contrast to the few commercially exploited warm water species of red algae, many red algae are small and relatively slow growing. However, making use of controlled land-based cultivation environments, offers the potential for manipulating cultivation conditions to optimize the yield of biomass or of the specific compounds of interest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref115">115</xref>] . In addition, the commercial value of the seaweed species can be enhanced by improving the quality and quantity of the desired compounds through cultivation techniques [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65566-ref115">115</xref>] , ecotype selection and through construction of biorefineries making commercial use of more than one seaweed-based product from the biomass produced.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This paper is a part of the research within the Innovation Consortium Natural Ingredients and Green Energy―with sustainable purification technologies (NIGE) financially supported by Danish Agency for Science Technology and Innovation as well as the project Macrofuels, funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 654010) to whom the authors are indebted. The authors further thank Theoharis Ouzounis and Tinna Christensen for graphic support, and Peter M. Kofoed, Gitte Jacobsen and Anna Marie Plejdrup, Aarhus University, for valuable assistance in the lab.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Behnaz Razi Parjikolaei,Annette Bruhn,Karin Loft Eybye,Martin M&#248;rk Larsen,Michael Bo Rasmussen,Knud Villy Christensen,Xavier C. Frett&#233;, (2016) Valuable Biomolecules from Nine North Atlantic Red Macroalgae: Amino Acids, Fatty Acids, Carotenoids, Minerals and Metals. Natural Resources,07,157-183. doi: 10.4236/nr.2016.74016</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.65566-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamed, I., Ozogul, F., Ozogul, Y. and Regenstein, J.M. (2015) Marine Bioactive Compounds and Their Health Benefits: A Review. Comprehensive Review in Food Science and Food Safety, 14, 446-465.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12136</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Holdt, S.L. and Kraan, S. (2011) Bioactive Compounds in Seaweed: Functional Food Applications and Legislation. Journal of Applied Phycology, 23, 543-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9632-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, R. (2008) Phycology. 4th Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812897</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">MacArtain, P., Gill, C.I.R., Brooks, M., Campbell, R. and Rowland, I.R. (2007) Nutritional Value of Edible Seaweeds. Nutrition Reviews, 65, 535-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.tb00278.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soler-Vila, A., Coughlan, S., Guiry, M.D. and Kraan, S. (2009) The Red Alga Porphyra dioica as a Fish-feed Ingredient for Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Effects on Growth, Feed Efficiency, and Carcass Composition. Journal of Applied Phycology, 21, 617-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-009-9423-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bixler, H. and Porse, H. (2011) A Decade of Change in the Seaweed Hydrocolloids Industry. Journal of Applied Phycology, 23, 321-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9529-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Galland-Irmouli, A.-V., Fleurence, J., Lamghari, R., Lu&amp;eacute;on, M., Rouxel, C., Barbaroux, O., Bronowicki, J.-P., Villaume, C. and Guéant, J.-L. (1999) Nutritional Value of Proteins from Edible Seaweed Palmaria palmata (Dulse). The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 10, 353-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2863(99)00014-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marsham, S., Scott, G.W. and Tobin, M.L. (2007) Comparison of Nutritive Chemistry of a Range of Temperate Seaweeds. Food Chemistry, 100, 1331-1336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.11.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morgan, K., Wright, J.C. and Simpson, F.J. (1980) Review of Chemical Constituents of the Red Alga Palmaria palmata (Dulse). Economic Botany, 34, 27-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02859553</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murata, M. and Nakazoe, J. (2001) Production and Use of Marine Algae in Japan. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 35, 281-290.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marrion, O., Fleurence. J., Schwertz, A., Guéant, J.-L., Mamelouk, L., Ksouri, J. and Villaume, C. (2005) Evaluation of Protein in Vitro Digestibility of Palmaria palmata and Gracilaria verrucosa. Journal of Applied Phycology, 17, 99-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-005-5154-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nordy, A. and Dyerberg, J. (1988) Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Health and Disease. Journal of Internal Medicine, 225, 81-83.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ransom, A.M. and Boris, W. (2003) Rapid Worldwide Depletion of Predatory Fish Communities. Nature, 423, 280-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01610</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tacon, A.G.J. and Metian, M. (2008) Global Overview on the Use of Fish Meal and Fish Oil in Industrially Compounded Aquafeeds: Trends and Future Prospects. Aquaculture, 285, 146-158.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gammone, M.A. and D’Orazio, N. (2015) Anti-Obesity Activity of the Marine Carotenoid Fucoxanthin. Marine Drugs, 13, 2196-2214. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md13042196</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zemke-White, W. and Ohno, M. (1999) World Seaweed Utilisation: An End-of-Century Summary. Journal of Applied Phycology, 11, 369-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008197610793</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takaichi, S. (2011) Carotenoids in Algae: Distributions, Biosyntheses and Functions. Marine Drugs, 9, 1101-1118.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md9061101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaswir, I., Noviendri, D., Hasrini, R.F. and Octavianti, F. (2011) Carotenoids: Sources, Medicinals Properties and Their Application in Food and Nutraceutical Industry. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 5, 7119-7131.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M&amp;auml;rz, U. (2008) The Global Market for Carotenoids. BCC Research Report FOD025C.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mageswaran, R. and Sivasubramanian, S. (1984) Mineral and Protein Content of Some Marine Algae from Costal Areas of Northern Sri Lanka. Journal of the National Science Foundation, 12, 179-189</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ruperez, P. (2002) Mineral Content of Edible Marine Seaweeds. Food Chemistry, 79, 23-26.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00171-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tabarsa, M., Rezaei, M., Ramezanpour, Z. and Waaland, J.R. (2012) Chemical Compositions of the Marine Algae Gracilaria salicornia (Rhodophyta) and Ulva lactuca (Chlorophyta) as a Potential Food Source. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture, 92, 2500-2506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5659</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Percival, E. (1979) Polysaccharides of Green, Red and Brown Seaweeds: Their Basic Structure, Biosynthesis and Function. British Phycological Journal, 14, 103-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071617900650121</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Necas, J. and Bartosikova, L. (2013) Carrageenan: A Review. Veterinarni Medicina, 58, 187-205.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Middelboe, A.L., Sand-Jensen, K. and Brodersen, K. (1997) Patterns of Macroalgal Distribution in the Kattegat-Baltic Region. Phycologia, 36, 208-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-36-3-208.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Culmo, R.F. (2010) Methods of Organic Nitrogen Analysis: Kjeldahl and the EA2410 N Analyzer (Dumas Method) PerkinElmer Publication EAN-8, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Angell, A.R., Mata, L., de Nys, R. and Paul, N.A. (2016) The Protein Content of Seaweeds: A Universal Nitrogen-to-Protein Conversion Factor of Five. Journal of Applied Phycology, 28, 511-524.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0650-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jung, S., Rickert, D.A., Deak, N.A., Aldin, E.D., Recknor, J., Johnson, L.A. and Murphy, P.A. (2003) Comparison of Kjeldahl and Dumas Methods for Determining Protein Contents of Soybean Products. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 80, 1169-1173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11746-003-0837-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization/Food and Agriculture Organization/United Nations University (2007) Protein and Amino Acid Requirement in Human Nutrition Report of a Joint WHO/FAO/UNU Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series No. 935, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dawczynski, C., Schubert, R. and Jahreis, G. (2007) Amino Acids, Fatty Acids, and Dietary Fibre in Edible Seaweed Products. Food Chemistry, 103, 891-899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Razi Parjikolaei, B., Kloster, L.A.B., Rasmussen, M.B., Fretté, X.C. and Christensen, K.V. (2013) Effect of Light Quality and Nitrogen Availability on the Biomass Production and Pigment Content of Palmaria palmata (Rhodophyta). Chemical Engineering Transactions, 32, 967-972.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gentili, A. and Caretti, F. (2011) Evaluation of a Method Based on Liquid Chromatography-Diode Array Detector-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for a Rapid and Comprehensive Characterization of the Fat-Soluble Vitamin and Carotenoid Profile of Selected Plant Foods. Journal of Chromatography, 1218, 684-697.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Uhe, A.M., Collier, G.R. and O’Dea, K. (1992) A Comparison of the Effects of Beef, Chicken and Fish Protein on Satiety and Amino Acid Profiles in Lean Male Subjects.Journal of Nutrition, 122, 467-472</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Misciattelli, L., Hvelplund, T., Weisbjerg, M.R., Madsen, J., M&amp;oslash;ller, J., Th&amp;oslash;gersen, R. and Kjeldsen, A.M. (2002) Fodermidlernes Indhold af Aminosyrer og Aminosyrernes Andel af AAT. Rapport nr. 98. Landbrugets R&amp;aring;dgivningscenter, Denmark.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mishra, V.K., Temelli, F., Ooraikul, B., Shacklock, P.F. and Craigie, J.S. (1993) Lipids of the Red Alga, Palmaria palmata. Botanica Marina, 36, 169-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/botm.1993.36.2.169</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mouritsen, O.G., Dawczynski, C., Duelund, L., Jahreis, G., Vetter, W. and Schr&amp;ouml;der, M. (2013) On the Human Consumption of the Red Seaweed Dulse (Palmaria palmata (L.) Weber &amp; Mohr). Journal of Applied Phycology, 25, 1777-1791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-013-0014-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fleurence, J. (1999) Seaweed Proteins: Biochemical, Nutritional Aspects and Potential Uses. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 10, 25-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00015-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marinho, G.S., Holdt, S.L. and Angelidaki, I. (2015) Seasonal Variations in the Amino Acid Profile and Protein Nutritional Value of Saccharina latissima Cultivated in a Commercial IMTA System. Journal of Applied Phycology, 25, 1991-2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0546-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Layman, D.K. (2004) Protein Quantity and Quality at Levels above the RDA Improves Adult Weight Loss. The Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 23, 631S-636S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2004.10719435</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McCarty, M.F., Barroso-Aranda, J. and Contreras, F. (2009) The Low-Methionine Content of Vegan Diets May Make Methionine Restriction Feasible as a Life Extension Strategy. Medical Hypotheses, 72, 125-128.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2008.07.044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mouritsen, O.G. (2012) Umami Flavour as a Means of Regulating Food Intake and Improving Nutrition and Health. The Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging, 21, 56-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0260106012445537</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yaich, H., Garna, H., Besbes, S., Paquot, M., Blecker, C. and Attia, H. (2011) Chemical Composition and Functional Properties of Ulva lactuca Seaweed Collected in Tunisia. Food Chemistry, 128, 895-901.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.03.114</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brody, T. (1998) Nutritional Biochemistry. University of California, Berkeley.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matanjun, P., Mohamed, S., Mustapha, N.M. and Muhammad, K. (2008) Nutrient Content of Tropical Edible Seaweeds, Eucheuma cottonii, Caulerpa lentillifera and Sargassum polycystum. Journal of Applied Phycology, 21, 75-80.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-008-9326-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kolb, N., Vallorani, L., Milanovi, N. and Stocchi, V. (2004) Evaluation of Marine Algae Wakama (Undaria pinnatifida) and Kombu (Laminaria digitata japonica) as Food Supplements. Food Technology and Biotechnology Journal, 42, 57-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fleurence, J., Moranais, M., Dumay, J., Decottignies, P., Turpin, V., Munier, M., Garcia-Bueno, N. and Jaouen, P. (2012) What Are the Prospects for Using Seaweed in Human Nutrition and for Marine Animals Raised through Aquaculture? Trends in Food Science and Technology, 27, 57-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2012.03.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Research Council (2005) Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (Macronutrients). The National Academies Press, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO Statistical Yearbook (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2004) Animal Production and Health Proceedings. FAO, Rome.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ayadi, F.Y., Rosentrater, K.A. and Muthukumarappan, K. (2012) Alternative Protein Sources for Aquaculture Feeds. Journal of Aquaculture Feed Science and Nutrition, 4, 1-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/joafsnu.2012.1.26</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">USDA (2013) Agricultural Research Service. National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 26, Beltsville.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miles, R.D. and Jacob, J.P. (2011) Fishmeal: Understanding Why This Feed Ingredient Is So Valuable in Poultry Diets (PS30). Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Millwar, D.J. (2012) Amino Acid Scoring Patterns for Protein Quality Assessment. British Journal of Nutrition, 108, S31-S43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512002462</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wegner, C.-E., Richter-Heitmann, T., Klindworth, A., Klockow, C., Richter, M., Achstetter, T., Gloeckner, F.O. and Harder, J. (2013) Expression of Sulfatases in Rhodopirellula baltica and the Diversity of Sulfatases in the Genus Rhodopirellula. Marine Genomics, 9, 51-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.margen.2012.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wison, R.P. and Halver, J.E. (1986) Protein and Amino acid Requirement of Fishes. Annual Review of Nutrition, 6, 225-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nu.06.070186.001301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vinoj Kumar, V. and Kaladharan, P. (2007) Amino Acids in the Seaweeds as an Alternate Source of Protein for Animal Feed. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, 49, 35-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mabeau, S. and Fleurence, J. (1993) Seaweed in Food Products: Biochemical and Nutritional Aspects. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 4, 103-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0924-2244(93)90091-N</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morrissey, J., Kraan, S. and Guiry, M.D. (2001) A Guide to Commercially Important Seaweeds on the Irish Coast. Bord Iascaigh Mhara/Irish Sea Fisheris Board, Dublin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumari, P., Kumar, M., Gupta, V., Reddy, C.R.K. and Jha, B. (2010) Tropical Marine Macroalgae as Potential Sources of Nutritionally Important PUFAs. Food Chemistry, 120, 749-757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.11.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fleurence, J., Gutbier, G., Mabeau, S. and Leray, C. (1994) Fatty Acids from 11 Marine Macroalgae of the French Brittany Coast. Journal of Applied Phycology, 6, 527-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02182406</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">van Ginneken, V.J., Helsper, J.P., de Visser, W., van Keulen, H. and Brandenburg, W.A. (2011) Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Various Macroalgal Species from North Atlantic and Tropical Seas. Lipid in Health and Disease, 10, 104.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-10-104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chuecas, L. and Riley, J.P. (1966) The Component Fatty Acids of Some Seaweed Fats. Journal of the Marine Biological Association UK, 46, 153-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400017616</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tasende, M.G. (1999) Fatty Acid and Sterol Composition of Gametophytes and Sporophytes of Chondrus crispus (Gigartinaceae, Rhodophyta). Scientia Marina, 64, 421-426</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dillon, J.T., Aponte, J.C., Tarozo, R. and Huang, Y. (2013) Purification of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids from Fish Oil Using Silver-Thiolate Chromatographic Material and High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Journal of Chromatography, 1312, 18-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2013.08.064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Pereira, L. (2011) A Review of the Nutrient Composition of Selected Edible Seaweeds. In: Pomin, V.H., Ed., Seaweed: Ecology, Nutrient Composition and Medicinal Uses, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Coimbra, 15-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bruhn, A., Rasmussen, M., Olesen, B. and Worm, T. (2008) Kommerciel Dyrkning af Carrageentang (Chondrus crispus) i danske Farvande. Aarhus University, Aarhus.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Black, W.A.P. (1950) The Seasonal Variation in Weight and Chemical Composition of the Common British Laminariaceae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association UK, 29, 45-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400056186</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gatenby, C., Orcutt, D., Kreeger, D., Parker, B., Jones, V. and Neves, R. (2003) Biochemical Composition of Three Algal Species Proposed as Food for Captive Freshwater Mussels. Journal of Applied Phycology, 15, 1-11.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022929423011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Renaud, S. and Luong-Van, J. (2007) Seasonal Variation in the Chemical Composition of Tropical Australian Marine Macroalgae. In: Anderson, R., Brodie, J., Ons&amp;oslash;yen, E. and Critchley, A., Eds., Eighteenth International Seaweed Symposium, Developments in Applied Phycology, Vol. 1, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 155-161.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5670-3_20</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bruhn, A., Dahl, J., Nielsen, H.B., Nikolaisen, L.S., Rasmussen, M.B., Markager, S., Olesen, B., Arias, C. and Jensen, P.D. (2011) Bioenergy Potential of Ulva lactuca: Growth Yield, Methane Production and Combustion.Bioresource Technology, 102, 2595-2604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lund-Hansen, L.C. (1994) Basisbog i Fysisk-biologisk Oceanografi. GAD.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sambamurty, A.V.S.S. (2005) A Textbook of Algae. I.K. International Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lobban, C.S. and Wynne, M.J. (1981) The Biology of Seaweeds. University of California Press, Oakland.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bj&amp;oslash;rnland, T. and Aguilar-Martinez, M. (1976) Carotenoids in Red Algae. Phytochemistry, 15, 291-296.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)89006-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bianchi, T.S., Kautsky, L. and Argyrou, M. (1997) Dominant Chlorophylls and Carotenoids in Macroalgae of the Baltic Sea (Baltic Proper): Their Use as Potential Biomarkers. Sarsia, 82, 55-62.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00364827.1997.10413637</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marquardt, J. and Hanelt, D. (2004) Carotenoid Composition of Delesseria lancifolia and Other Marine Red Algae from Polar and Temperate Habitats. European Journal of Phycology, 39, 285-292.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09670260410001712572</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guedes, A.C., Amaro, H.M. and Malcata, F.X. (2011) Microalgae as Sources of Carotenoids. Marine Drugs, 9, 625-644. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md9040625</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Masetto, A., Flores-Cotera, L.B., Díaz, C., Langley, E. and Sanchez, S. (2001) Application of a Complete Factorial Design for the Production of Zeaxanthin by Flavobacterium sp. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 92, 55-58.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(01)80199-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O’Neill, M.E., Carroll, Y., Corridan, B., Olmedilla, B., Granado, F., Blanco, I., Van den Berg, H., Hininger, I., Rausell, A.M., Chopra, M., Southon, S. and Thurnham, D.I. (2001) A European Carotenoid Database to Assess Carotenoid Intakes and Its Use in a Five-Country Comparative Study. British Journal of Nutrition, 85, 499-507.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/BJN2000284</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Torrissen, O.J. and Christiansen, R. (1995) Requirements for Carotenoids in Fish Diets. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 11, 225-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.1995.tb00022.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Britton, G., Liaaen-Jensen, S. and Pfander, H. (2009) Carotenoids: Natural Functions. Vol. 4, Springer, Berlin.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-7501-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Holdt, S.L. (2009) Nutrient Reduction in Aquaculture Waste by Macroalgae Production. PhD Dissertation, University of Southern Denmark, Odense.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Munda, I. (1972) Chemical Composition, Distribution and Ecology of Some Common Benthicmarine Algae from Iceland. Botanica Marina, 15, 1-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/botm.1972.15.1.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ruperez, P. and Toledano, G. (2003) Indigestible Fraction of Edible Marine Seaweeds. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture, 83, 1267-1272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1536</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kebelmann, K., Hornung, A., Karsten, U. and Griffiths, G. (2013) Thermo-Chemical Behaviour and Chemical Product Formation from Polar Seaweeds during Intermediate Pyrolysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 104, 131-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.08.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pereira, L. and van de Velde, F. (2011) Portuguese Carrageenophytes: Carrageenan Composition and Geographic Distribution of Eight Species (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta). Carbohydrate Polymers, 84, 614-623.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morgan, K.C. and Simpson, F.J. (1981) The Cultivation of Palmaria palmate. Effect of Light Intensity and Nitrate Supply on Growth and Chemical Composition. Botanica Marina, 24, 273-277.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/botm.1981.24.5.273</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lund-Hansen, L.C. (2011) Subsurface Chlorophyll Maximum (SCM) Location and Extension in the Water Column as Governed by a Density Interface in the Strongly Stratified Kattegat Estuary. Hydrobiologia, 673, 105-118.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/botm.1981.24.5.273</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lamare, M.D. and Wing, S.R. (2001). Calorific Content of New Zealand Marine Macrophytes. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 35, 335-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2001.9517004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ross, A.B., Jones, J.M., Kubacki, M.L. and Bridgeman, T. (2008) Classification of Macroalgae as Fuel and Its Thermochemical Behavior. Bioresource Technology, 99, 6494-6504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adams, J.M.M., Ross, A.B., Anastasakis, K., Hodgson, E.M., Gallagher, J.A., Jone, J.M. and Donnison, I.S. (2011) Seasonal Variation in the Chemical Composition of the Bioenergy Feedstock Laminaria digitata for Thermochemical Conversion. Bioresource Technology, 102, 226-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.152</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jayasree, N.B., Aneesh, T., Prabhakar, V.A. and Anandan, R.B. (2012) GC-MS, HPLC and AAS Analysis of Fatty Acids, Amino Acids and Minerals in Red Algae Ampheroa Anceps. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4, 187-190.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinez-Ballesta, M.C., Dominguez-Perles, R., Moreno, D.A., Muries, B., Alcaraz-López, C., Bastías, E., García-Viguera, C. and Carvajal, M. (2010) Minerals in Plant Food: Effect of Agricultural Practices and Role in Human Health. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30, 295-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spears, J.W. (1996) Organic Trace Minerals in Ruminant Nutrition. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 58, 151-163.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00881-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suttle, N.F. (2010) Mineral Nutrition of Livestock. 4th Edition, CABI, London.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781845934729.0000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nisizawa, K., Noda, H., Kikuchi, R. and Watanabe, T. (1987) TheMain Seaweed Foods in Japan. Hydrobiologia, 151, 5-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00046102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO/WHO (2001) Human Vitamin and Mineral Requirements.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sundhedsministeriet (2003) Sundhedsministeriets Bekendtg&amp;oslash;relse 683 af 21.07.2003 om kosttilskud.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Henney, J.E., Taylor, C.L. and Boon, C.S. (2010) Appendix C. International Efforts to Reduce Sodium Consumption. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Strategies to Reduce Sodium Intake, The National Academies Press, Washington DC, Bookshelf ID: NBK50961.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ortega-Calvo, J.J., Mazuelos, C., Hermosin, B. and Saizjimenez, C. (1993) Chemical Composition of Spirulina and Eukaryotic Algae Food Products Marketed in Spain. Journal of Applied Phycology, 5, 425-435.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02182735</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EU (2002) EU Directive 2002/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7th May 2002 on Undesirable Substances in Animal Feed.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Almela, C., Clemente, M.J., Velez, D. and Montoro, R. (2006) Total Arsenic, Inorganic Arsenic, Lead and Cadmium Contents in Edible Seaweed Sold in Spain. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 44, 1901-1908.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2006.06.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Besada, V., Andrade, J.M., Schultze, F. and Gonzalez, J.J. (2009) Heavy Metals in Edible Seaweeds Commercialised for Human Consumption. Journal of Marine Systems, 75, 305-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.10.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharp, G.J., Samant, H.S. and Vaidya, O.C. (1988) Selected Metal Levels of Commercially Valuable Seaweeds Adjacent to and Distant from Point Sources of Contamination in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 40, 724-730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01697522</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adams, J.M.M., Toop, T.A., Donnison, I.S. and Gallagher, J.A. (2011) Seasonal Variation in Laminaria digitata and Its Impact on Biochemical Conversion Routes to Biofuels. Bioresource Technology, 102, 9976-9984.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thomson, D., Maher, W. and Foster, S. (2007) Arsenic and Selected Elements in Inter-Tidal and Estuarine Marine Algae, South-East Coast, NSW, Australia. Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 21, 396-411.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aoc.1231</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO (2012) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2012. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome, 230.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mansilla, A., ávila, M. and Yokoya, N.S. (2012) Current Knowledge on Biotechnological Interesting Seaweeds from the Magellan Region, Chile. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, 22, 760-767.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2012005000074</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maggs, C.A. and Pueschel, C.M. (1989) Morphology and Development of Ahnfeltia plicata (Rhodophyta: Proposal of Ahnfeltiales Ord.Nov.1. Journal of Phycology, 25, 333-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1989.tb00131.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref109"><label>109</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laos, K. and Ring, S. (2005) Note: Characterisation of Furcellaran Samples from Estonian Furcellaria lumbricalis (Rhodophyta). Journal of Applied Phycology, 17, 461-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-005-1635-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref110"><label>110</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bidwell, R.G.S., McLachlan, J. and Lloyd, N.D.H. (1985) Tank Cultivation of Irish Moss, Chondrus crispus Stackh. Botanica Marine, 28, 87-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-005-1635-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref111"><label>111</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Braud, J. (2006) Continuous Seaweed Tank Culture in France: From Chondrus crispus to Coculture of Macroalgae and the Diatom Odontella aurita. In: Critchley, A.T., Ohno, M. and Largo, D.B., Eds., Seaweed Resources of the World, Japan International Cooperation Agency, Yokosuka.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref112"><label>112</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinez, B., Viejo, R.M., Rico, J.M., Rodde, R.H., Faes, V.A., Oliveros, J. and Alvarez, D. (2006) Open Sea Cultivation of Palmaria palmata (Rhodophyta) on the Northern Spanish Coast. Aquaculture, 254, 376-387.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.10.025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref113"><label>113</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pang, S.J. and Lüning, K. (2006) Tank Cultivation of the Red Alga Palmaria palmata: Year-Round Induction of Tetrasporangia, Tetraspore Release in Darkness and Mass Cultivation of Vegetative Thalli. Aquaculture, 252, 20-30.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.046</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref114"><label>114</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Corey, P., Kim, J.K., Duston, J., Garbary, D.J. and Prithiviraj, B. (2013) Bioremediation Potential of Palmaria palmata and Chondrus crispus (Basin Head): Effect of Nitrate and Ammonium Ratio as Nitrogen Source on Nutrient Removal. Journal of Applied Phycology, 25, 1349-1358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-013-9977-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref115"><label>115</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hafting, J.T., Critchley, A.T., Cornish, M.L., Hubley, S.A. and Archibald, A.F. (2012) On-Land Cultivation of Functional Seaweed Products for Human Usage. Journal of Applied Phycology, 24, 385-392.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-011-9720-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref116"><label>116</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Msuya, F. and Neori, A. (2008) Effect of Water Aeration and Nutrient Load Level on Biomass Yield, N Uptake and Protein Content of the Seaweed Ulva lactuca Cultured in Seawater Tanks. Journal of Applied Phycology, 20, 1021-1031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-007-9300-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref117"><label>117</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bolton, J., Robertson-Andersson, D., Shuuluka, D. and Kandjengo, L. (2009) Growing Ulva (Chlorophyta) in Integrated Systems as a Commercial Crop for Abalone Feed in South Africa: A SWOT Analysis. Journal of Applied Phycology, 21, 575-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-008-9385-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref118"><label>118</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abreu, M.H., Pereira, R., Yarish, C., Buschmann, A.H. and Sousa-Pinto, I. (2011) IMTA with Gracilaria vermiculophylla: Productivity and Nutrient Removal Performance of the Seaweed in a Land-Based Pilot Scale System. Aquaculture, 312, 77-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.12.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref119"><label>119</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nielsen, M.M., Bruhn, A., Rasmussen, M.B., Olesen, B., Larsen, M.M. and Moller, H.B. (2012) Cultivation of Ulva lactuca with Manure for Simultaneous Bioremediation and Biomass Production. Journal of Applied Phycology, 24, 449-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-011-9767-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref120"><label>120</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sode, S., Bruhn, A., Balsby, T.S.J., Larsen, M.M., Gotfredsen, A. and Rasmussen, M.B. (2013) Bioremediation of Reject Water from Anaerobically Digested Waste Water Sludge with Macroalgae (Ulva lactuca, Chlorophyta). Bioresource Technology, 146, 426-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.06.062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref121"><label>121</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McHugh, D.J. (2003) A Guide to the Seaweed Industry. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, Rome, 1-105.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref122"><label>122</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jung, K.A., Lim, S.R., Kim, Y. and Park, J.M. (2013) Potentials of Macroalgae as Feedstocks for Biorefinery. Bioresource Technology, 135, 182-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref123"><label>123</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ruiz, H.A., Rodriguez-Jasso, R.M., Fernandes, B.D., Vicente, A.A. and Teixeira, J.A. (2013) Hydrothermal Processing, as an Alternative for Upgrading Agriculture Residues and Marine Biomass According to the Biorefinery Concept: A Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21, 35-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref124"><label>124</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wei, N., Quarterman, J. and Jin, Y.S. (2013) Marine Macroalgae: An Untapped Resource for Producing Fuels and Chemicals. Trends in Biotechnology, 31, 70-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.10.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref125"><label>125</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lorbeer, A.J., Tham, R. and Zhang, W. (2013) Potential Products from the Highly Diverse and Endemic Macroalgae of Southern Australia and Pathways for Their Sustainable Production. Journal of Applied Phycology, 25, 717-732.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-013-0003-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref126"><label>126</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kern, M., McGeehan, J.E., Streeter, S.D., et al. (2013) Structural Characterization of a Unique Marine Animal Family 7 Cellobiohydrolase Suggests a Mechanism of Cellulose Salt Tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 10189-10194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301502110</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref127"><label>127</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crist, R.H., Martin, J.R., Guptill, P.W., Eslinger, J.M. and Crist, D.R. (1990) Interaction of Metals and Protons with Algae. 2. Ion Exchange in Adsorption and Metal Displacement by Protons. Environmental Science and Technology, 24, 337-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00073a008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref128"><label>128</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vasconcelos, M.T.S.D. and Leal, M.F.C. (2001) Seasonal Variability in the Kinetics of Cu, Pb, Cd and Hg Accumulation by Macroalgae. Marine Chemistry, 74, 65-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(00)00096-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref129"><label>129</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tyler, R.T., Youngs, C.G. and Sosulski, F.W. (1981) Air Classification of Legumes. 1. Separation Efficiency, Yield, and Composition of the Starch and Protein Fractions. Cereal Chemistry, 58, 144-148.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref130"><label>130</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EU (1997) EU Novel Food Catalogue.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref131"><label>131</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lísa, M., Netusilová, K., Franěk, L., Dvoráková, H., Vrkoslav, V. and Holcapek, M. (2011) Characterization of Fatty Acid and Triacylglycerol Composition in Animal Fats Using Silver-Ion and Non-Aqueous Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry and Gas Chromatography/Flame Ionization Detection. Journal of Chromatography A, 1218, 7499-7510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.07.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref132"><label>132</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Landim, A.V., Cardoso, M.T., Castanheira, M., Fioravanti, M.C., Louvandini, H. and McManus, C. (2011) Fatty Acid Profile of Hair Lams and Their Crossbreds Slaughtered at Different Wrights. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 8, 1561-1566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9842-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref133"><label>133</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoekman, S.K., Broch, A., Robbins, C., Ceniceros, E. and Natarajan, M. (2012) Review of Biodiesel Composition, Properties, and Specifications. Renewable &amp; Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 143-169.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref134"><label>134</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grunewald, N., Groth, I. and Alban, S. (2009) Evaluation of Seasonal Variations of the Structure and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Sulfated Polysaccharides Extracted from the Red Alga Delesseria sanguinea (Hudson) Lamouroux (Ceramiales, Delesseriaceae). Biomacromolecule, 10, 1155-1162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bm8014158</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref135"><label>135</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tariq, V.N. (1991) Antifungal Activity in Crude Extracts of Marine Red Algae. Mycological Research, 95, 1433-1435.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80398-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref136"><label>136</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lahaye, M. and Vigouroux, J. (1992) Liquefaction of Dulse (Palmaria palmata (L.) Kuntze) by a Commercial Enzyme Preparation and a Purified Endo,β-1,4-D-xylanase. Journal of Applied Phycology, 4, 329-337.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02185790</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref137"><label>137</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dauguet, J.C., Bert, M., Dolley, J. and Bert, J.J. (1993) Sterols of Phycodrys rubens (Delesseriaceae, Ceramiales). Cryptogamie. Algologie, 14, 99-104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref138"><label>138</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Potin, P., Patier, P., Floch, J.Y., Yvin, J.C. and Rochas, C. (1992) Chemical Characterization of Cell-Wall Polysaccharides from Tank-Cultivated and Wild Plants of Delesseria sanguinea (Hudson) Lamouroux (Ceramiales, Delesseriaceae): Culture Patterns and Potent Anticoagulant Activity. Journal of Applied Phycology, 4, 119-128.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02442460</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref139"><label>139</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martin, G., Paalme, T. and Torn, K. (2006) Growth and Production Rates of Loose-Lying and Attached Forms of the Red Algae Furcellaria lumbricalis and Coccotylus truncatus in Kassari Bay, the West Estonian Archipelago Sea. Hydrobiologia, 554, 107-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1010-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref140"><label>140</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">van de Poll, W.H., Eggert, A., Buma, A.G.J. and Breeman, A.M. (2001) Effects of UV-Binduced DNA Damage and Photoinhibition on Growth of Temperate Marine Red Macrophytes: Habitat-Related Differences in UV-B Tolerance. Journal of Phycology, 37, 30-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-005-1010-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65566-ref141"><label>141</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gordillo, F.J.L. (2008) Ecophysiological Changes in Arctic Seaweeds Triggered by Rising Temperature and Dissolved CO2 (SEATEC). University of Malaga, Malaga.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>