The F.A conforming [6] , used in the study was the portion of the ash collected through electrostatics precipitators of Harduaganj Thermal Power Station Aligarh (U.P) India. The ordinary Portland cement of 43 Grade [7] was being used. The different types of waste polythene bags fibre were used in the experiment to carry daily usable items from general stores and shopping malls. The physical properties of different materials used in the study are given in Table 1. The finely ground calcium hydroxide (laboratory regent) was being used to augment

the cementitious properties of the F.A. Its optimum amount with respect to optimum moisture contents (OMC) and maximum dry density (MDD) was determined through Standard Proctor’s Test [8] . Several tests were carried out in order to evaluate the strength of treated fly ash based roof tiles.

A scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDS) techniques are being used in the chemical analysis of T.F.A and R.S.D. In the construction industry, the combination of SEM and EDS are being used particularly for quality control and verification of material composition. The VEGA3 SEM, which is fully compatible with any EDS system, is a powerful tool for quality control and development in the construction industry. Locally available T.F.A and R.S.D samples were examined in the present study. After examination of the samples it has been found that both samples were non-hazardous in nature and vigorously used as an additional construction materials. EDS analysis was performed using Bruker’s Quantax system to determine the chemical composition of the T.F.A and R.S.D particles. The chemical composition of T.F.A and R.S.D particles and the element distribution over the sample surface was determined by EDS. Exact chemical composition is then summarized in Table 2 and Table 3.

Apart from oxygen, silicon and aluminum, from which the fly ash is usually composed; many other elements were found as well. In R.S.D sample iron and many other elements also found with the combination of oxygen, silicon and aluminum. The presence of diverse elements in fly ash particles might be attributed to the kind of coal being burned. The Quantitative results from point analysis of T.F.A and R.S.D are being used in the study are also shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2.

The fly ash consists of fine powdery particles that are predominantly spherical in shape, either solid or hollow and mostly glassy in nature. The particles size distribution of most bituminous coal fly ashes is generally similar to that of silt (<0.075 mm). Although, Sub-bituminous coal fly ashes or class C fly ash is generally slightly coarser than bituminous coal ranges between 0.002 mm - 0.1 mm. As can be seen in Figure 3, the variation of particles in Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM): T.F.A at 3000x Magnification and Figure 4 shows SE image of T.F.A at 6000x Magnification were collected from Harduaganj Thermal Power Station U.P (India).

Construction material such as Radish Stone Dust (R.S.D) admixtures are mixed with cement particles and improved the particle packing of cement paste, thus reducing permeability (k). Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM): R.S.D particles at 3000x magnification and SE image of R.S.D at 6000× magnification was collected locally used in the present study.

Cement is a binding material, which is widely used in the construction industry. It is made from limestone, clay and various additives, such as powered gypsum and fly ash. Gypsum (CaSO₄∙2H₂O) is a common and soft mineral. It is used as a set retarder in the early stage of hydration. It keeps the mortar of the concrete in a plastic stage for longer time and therefore it prolongs concrete workability. The combination of T.F.A and R.S.D with cement discloses the various important benefits of the composite material. The replacement of cement by fly ash reduces the water demand and the decreased water demand has a little or no effect on drying shrinkage/cracking. So, the reduction in free lime and the resulting increase in cementitious compounds combined with the reduction in permeability and enhance the mortar durability. The additional binder produced by the fly ash reaction with available lime allows fly ash based composite material to continue to gain strength over time.

In order to evaluate the strength of clay based tiles available in the market several tests were carried out. Local brick tiles from four different manufacturers (designated as M, B, S and O) were used having approximate length as 230, 110 and 38 mm respectively. The summaries of test results are shown in Table 4. An average compressive strength for all the clay brick tiles used in the study is shown in the Figure 7(a). The water absorption capacity of the tile material is given by the WA test. The absorption of moisture by capillary action in the tiles produces a suction effect that draws water from mortar and this characteristic is defined by IRA. The rate of absorption can have an important effect on the interaction between freshly laid mortar and the brick and tile units. IRA was measured in order to assist in mortar selection and material handling in the construction process. It was measured in terms of mass of water absorbed per minute by the brick material per unit area of brick immersed in about 3 mm deep water, which was kept constant by adding water during the test, as per [9] [10] , was used to perform a WA test whose provisions are similar to those given in [9] .

The mixing procedure for the mortars consists of homogeneous materials with measured quantity of water mixing, and then introducing the cementitious materials gradually over 30 seconds. After a break period of 30 seconds, the composite material was remixed for another 2 min. As summarized in Table 5, six composite series were made with the variation of C, T.F.A C.S and S.D. Three moulds of each combination were prepared for strength determination of roof tiles. The weighted material was placed on a level platform, W.P.F sprinkled gently on it and was mixed using mixer. Care was taken to prevent agglomeration of fibres and to ensure their uniform distribution as far as possible. The fresh mortar was poured into three equal layers in the mould also properly placed and compact. In each series, different combinations of, C, T.F.A, C.S and S.D were tested at the same combination of W.P.F. Testing and sampling of all composite mixtures was made at room temperature (25˚C ± 2˚C).

To avoid entrapment of air, the tested material was well compacted using a tamping device in three layers of approximate similar heights, several tests were carried out in order to evaluate the compressive strength and stress-strain characteristics of fly ash based roof tiles. The six different combination of TFASDRT were tested as summarized in Table 5, having approximate length, width and height as 230, 110, and 38 mm, respectively. The tests were performed in accordance with [10] .

Phase 1: validity of compressive behavior of fly ash tiles

The perusal of three combinations in phase 1 at 70%, 60% and 50% of fly ash gives the maximum value at 50% fly ash combination. Using this approach to set the maximum percentage of T.F.A was 50 % for phase 2 obser-

vation. The control point of this phase is that, there is no variation in cement and stone dust combination. On the other hand the significant changes were found in the strength with the variation of fly ash and coarse sand. The Figure 7(b) shows the variation in compressive strength for phase 1 observation.

Phase 2: validity of compressive behavior of fly ash tiles

The perusal of three combinations in phase 2 at 10%, 15% and 20% of cement with 50% fly ash combination fixed in phase 1 gives the maximum value at 20% cement combination. The control point of this phase is that, there is no variation in treated fly ash and stone dust combination. On the hand, the rapid increase in the compressive strength has been seen with the variation of cement percentage. Increase the strength continues in phase 2 with the variation of cement along with coarse sand. At 20% cement combination gives the maximum strength at (20 TFASDRT) were found (9.01 MPa). Figure 7(c) shows the variation in compressive strength for phase 2 observation.

It had already been observed, how the soil type can make such differences to the value of permeability. e.g., clean gravel has a k value greater than 10˚ cm/s, sand between 10˚ and 10⁻³ cm/s, silt between 10⁻³ and 10⁻⁶ cm/s and clay has k values smaller than 10⁻⁶ cm/s. The variation in the value of permeability is very large that we are interested mostly in determining the power to which 10 must be raised while expressing the permeability value [11] . Using experimental data [12] as summarized in Table 5 were determined the permeability of composite material on the same ratios using in the present study in which F.A as a main constituent and other materials are subsidiary. As it can be seen in Figure 7(d) and Figure 7(e) the permeability (k) decreases from 4.603 × 10⁻⁷ to 0.874 × 10⁻⁷ m/s. The experimental study reveals that the lower permeability values were obtained when increasing the percentage of C at fixed percentage of T.F.A and R.S.D. whereby k dropped sharply with variation of C.S with C. The permeability (k) falling in the range of 10⁻⁷ which is much closer to the value of clay which is available in the market for making bricks and roof tiles.

Only few studies have been conducted on fly ash based bricks and tiles. Since fly ash based bricks and tiles is an assemblage of fly ash and other materials. It is generally believed that the strength and durability of fly ash based bricks and tiles would lie somewhere between that of bond of fly ash and other mixed materials. It may be true in cases when one combination of mould, i.e., cement, fly ash, sand and stone dust, etc is substantially weaker and softer than other, for example variation of these materials play a significant role to change their strength as reported by [13] , conducted series of tests on different combination with partial replacement of clay for making fly ash bricks. It was observed that the combination of materials play a significant role to change the compressive strength. The combination of fibre reinforced fly ash lime stone dust brick (10FRFALSDB3') was found to have highest compressive strength (9.155 MPa) with 10% stone dust and sand combination at 10% cement. It was found that when the amount of treated fly ash changes with respect to the stone dust and sand replacement, the compressive strength increased and was found to be maximum 25% stone dust-sand combination

with 50% treated fly ash. The variation of strength is shown in Figure 7(f). Based on experimental data [14] conducted a series of tests on fly ash based brick tiles. It was observed that the compressive strength of these tiles increases with increase in bond strength of the composite material along with other factors. It has been also observed that the permeability reached at lower value at the same whereas compressive strength was reached at maximum. After experimental investigation it has been carried out that the tiles were failed on lower compressive strength as compare to the conventional clay brick tiles. The highest compressive strength reached (6.896 MPa) for the combination of 15TFASDBT. The detailed experimental data of the past investigations are given in Table 6. Figure 7(g) and Figure 7(h) shows the seepage and compressive strength behavior of the study.

Six different combination grades of moulds (C: T.F.A: C.S: S.D) by volume were used in the study, viz., 1:7:1:1, 00TFASDRT (70% TFA), 1:6:2:1 10TFASDRT, (60% TFA) and 1:5:3:1, 10TFASDRT (50% TFA) observed at highest compressive strength for the first phase of the observation. For phase second 1:5:2:2 20TFASDRT (10% C), 1:3.33:1:1.33 20TFASDRT (15% C), and 1:2.5:0.5:1 20TFASDRT (20% C) achieved highest value of compressive strength. The compressive strength was obtained by averaging the data from three observations of each grade.

The failure modes of tested samples are shown in Figure 8. Weak mortar was found to be very weak and soft as compared to other three i.e., intermediate, strong and very strong. Intermediate mortar perform stable as compared to weak and strength increased about (29.41%), then Strong mortar performed well in terms of strength and ductility as compared to other two, strong mortars was found (51.40%), higher than intermediate mortar, in comparison of strong mortar very strong mortar was reached the highest strength about (29.08%) more than the strong.

Several tests were carried out in order to evaluate the uniaxial compressive stress-strain curves of fly ash and clay based tiles. The fly ash based tiles were constructed with different combination moulds. Local clay tiles from four different manufacturers (designated as M, B, S, and O) were used, having approximate length, width, and height as 230, 110, and 38 mm respectively. Clay and fly ash tiles were subjected to monotonically increasing displacement loading (strain controlled) at their top which was applied vertically by a 250 kN load and ±125 mm displacement capacity MTS servo-hydraulic actuator. However, tiles units were tested in a 2000 kN universal testing machine under stress-controlled loading. In the case of clay and fly ash tiles, the displacements were recorded on their faces as shown in Figure 8.

The tests were performed in accordance with [9] , and [10] . The stress-strain curves for the four types of clay tiles obtained by averaging the stress strain data from ten samples of each type of clay tiles. The tiles were found to be behaving linearly up to about one-third of the ultimate failure load after that the behavior became highly nonlinear. An average stress-strain curve for all the tiles types used in the study is also shown in Figure 9. The summary of results including water absorption is given in Table 4. For different tiles used in the study, mean compressive strength were found (9.2 MPa).

The stress-strain curves for six grades of mould obtained by averaging the data from ten specimens of each grade. Initial straight portion of the stress-strain curve (up to about one-third of mould strength) is followed by a nonlinear curve almost same as stress-strain curves for standard clay brick tiles discussed above which extends well beyond the strain limits corresponding to the tiles samples. Strain readings on the falling branch of the stress-strain curve could not be recorded for the very weak moulds because of its brittle and explosive crushing failure after reaching the ultimate strength. The crushing failure of other grade specimens was more ductile and nonexplosive. The summary of test results of six grades for Phase 1 and phase 2 are given in Table 5. The majority of tiles used in the phase 2 observation were stronger and stiffer than phase 1. Figure 10(a) shows that the

stress-strain curve comparison for six different combination grades of moulds TFASDRT. Data points represent experimental results and solid lines represent corresponding trend lines. A comparison of stress-stain curves generated by the TFASDRT and SCBT obtained in the present experimental study is shown in Figure 10(b), which show a very close match between the TFASDRT and SCBT curves.