<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JSS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Social Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5952</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jss.2016.43034</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JSS-65153</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Analysis of Dividend Policy Influence Factors of China’s Listed Banks
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>anqiong</surname><given-names>Zhong</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>School of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>zhongyanqiong528@163.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>03</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>272</fpage><lpage>278</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>27</month>	<year>March</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This article analyzes the present situation of dividend distribution of listed banks in China based on the 2010-2013 panel data, the results show that some of the listed banks do not pay dividend, but the proportion is small, the dividend payment rate is generally low but the state-controlled banks often have a higher rate. Then the article analyzes the factors affecting dividend policy of listed banks by using empirical method, and finds that profitability and liquidity of assets have a positive effect on the dividend payment rate, debt levels have a negative effect on the dividend payment rate, and the growth ability and operation ability have no significant effect on the rate of dividend payment.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Listed Banks</kwd><kwd> Dividend Policy</kwd><kwd> Influence Factor</kwd><kwd> Dividend Payment Rate</kwd><kwd> Profitability</kwd><kwd> Growth Ability</kwd><kwd> Operation Capacity</kwd><kwd> Debt Levels</kwd><kwd> Liquidity of Assets</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Dividend is the distribution of earnings shareholders gain from the company. The dividend policy of a company depends on its development plan and the shareholders’ trade-off analysis between the immediate interests and the future development of the company. Dividend policy is a very important decision of listed companies because it plays a vital role in the operation and development of the company. Reasonable dividend policy can set up a good image for the company, attract more investors, and provide financial support for the development of the company. Therefore, when making the dividend policy, the listed companies usually have a comprehensive consideration, so as to choose an appropriate dividend policy for the development of the company.</p><p>Banking is the lifeblood of survival and development for other industries, its development plays an important role in the country’s economic health. In recent years, the banking industry is getting more and more attention, its dividend policy is getting extra attention because of its high profits. The dividend policy influence factors of banking industry are different from other industries because of the essential difference between the banking industry and other industries, the banking industry’s main object of management is monetary assets, and its main business has the characteristics of high risk, high liability and the creation of credit. Scholars both in China and abroad have made a study of the dividend policy influence factors of listed Banks.</p><p>The main study of dividend policy influence factors of banking industry by foreign scholars are as follows: Dickens, Casey and Newman [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65153-ref1">1</xref>] studied the bank dividend policy influence factors by empirical method, and the results showed that the investment opportunities, scale of assets, the problem of agency, former dividend policy and risk of company have influence on dividend policy. John The is and Amitabh S. Dutta [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65153-ref2">2</xref>] selected 99 companies as samples to make a study based on Dickens’ model, and found the nonlinear relationship between the internal shareholding level and the dividend payment rate of bank holding company.</p><p>The main study of listed banks dividend policy influence factors by Chinese scholars are as follows: Wang Manshu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65153-ref3">3</xref>] made a descriptive analysis of cash dividend distribution situation of 14 China’s listed banks, and drew the conclusion that China’s listed banks are more likely to pay cash dividends compared with non-financial listed companies, but their cash dividend payment rate is often lower than non-financial listed companies. Besides, size, profitability and security have positive influence on cash dividend payment rate of China’s listed Bank. GuoYangyang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65153-ref4">4</xref>] analyzed the characteristics of cash dividend policy of listed Banks in China and put forward suggestions for improvement of cash dividend policy. Liu Zhiwei, Zhao Yongqin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65153-ref5">5</xref>] selected the data from 2008 to 2010 to analyze the dividend policy of 14 listed banks in China, they also made empirical analysis using the regression analysis model, and found that earnings per share is a main factor of cash dividend policy, debt asset ratio is negatively related to the dividend payment rate but the relationship was not significant, total assets and capital adequacy ratio is also negatively related to the dividend payment rate. Chen Yue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.65153-ref6">6</xref>] made empirical analysis for 14 listed Banks in China using the data from 2006 to 2010, and the result showed that the return on equity is negatively related to the cash dividend payment rate, most listed banks in China have high profit but low dividend payment rate, they pay much attention to financing but ignore to pay back for shareholders.</p><p>In April 1991, as the first listed bank in China, Ping An Bank Co., Ltd. listed on the Shenzhen stock exchange, after that, some commercial banks are listed on the stock exchange with the deepening of financial reform in China. At present, there are 16 listed banks in China which are listed on the Shanghai stock exchange or Shenzhen stock exchange, they promote the development of China’s financial, also inject new vitality for China’s stock market. This article will analyze the current situation of dividend policy of China’s listed banks, and then make an empirical analysis using the data from 2010 to 2013, and finally draw some conclusions according to the empirical analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Present Situation of the Dividend Policy of China’s Listed Banks</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. The Present Situation of China’s Listed Banks</title><p>At present, there are 16 listed banks in China including which listed on Shenzhen stock exchange and Shanghai stock exchange. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the basic information of the 16 listed banks.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> show that most of the headquarters of China’s listed banks are located in the economically developed provinces and regions, 94% are concentrated in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong, Jiangsu and Zhejiang area, what is more, there are 56% located in Beijing. Besides, there are only 16 listed banks in Shenzhen stock exchange and Shanghai stock exchange, it is quite a small number compared to the thousands of listed companies in China.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. The Present Situation of Dividend Policy of China’s Listed Banks</title><p>1) A small proportion of listed banks do not pay dividends</p><p>According to the dividend payment rate data of China’s listed banks from RESSET database, we can calculate the proportion of listed banks which do not pay dividend to shareholders from 2010 to 2013, and the results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> as follows:</p><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, we can learn that the quantity and proportion of listed banks which do not pay dividend is quite small from 2010 to 2013, most of the listed banks would pay dividend to shareholders, the proportion of listed banks which pay dividend even reached to 100% in 2012 and 2013.</p><p>2) The dividend payment rate of listed banks is low</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The basic information of China’s listed banks</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stock code</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Name of bank</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Listed stock exchange</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Listed time</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Headquarters</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >000001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PingAn Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shenzhen stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >April 1991</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Guangdong</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >600000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai Pudong Development Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >November 1999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >600016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >China Minsheng Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >December 2000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beijing</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >600036</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >China Merchants Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >April 2002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Guangdong</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >600015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Huaxia Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >September 2003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beijing</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >601988</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bank of China</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >June 2006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beijing</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >601398</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Industrial and Commercial Bank of China</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >October 2006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beijing</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >601166</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Industrial Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >February2007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fujian</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >601998</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >China Citic Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >April 2007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beijing</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >601328</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bank of Communications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >May 2007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >601009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bank of Nanjing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >July 2007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jiangsu</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >002142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bank of Ningbo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shenzhen stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >July 2007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zhejiang</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >601169</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bank of Beijing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >September 2007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beijing</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >601939</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >China Construction Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >September 2007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beijing</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >601288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agricultural Bank of China</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >July 2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beijing</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >601818</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >China Everbright Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai stock exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >August 2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beijing</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The proportion of listed banks which do not pay dividend</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Listed banks which do not pay dividend</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proportion</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.50%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Dividend payment rate is different from different countries and different industries, in China, the listed company’s average dividend payment rate is about 30%, and in foreign countries, the average dividend payment rate is around 40%. We calculated the average dividend payment rate of China’s listed banks from 2010 to 2013 based on the dividend payment rate data from RESSET database, and the results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, we can see that the average dividend payment rate of China’s listed Banks have a slowly rising trend year by year from 2010 to 2013, but overall the dividend payment rate is low, maintain at the levels of 23% to 27%, lower than the average dividend payment rate of listed companies in China and the average dividend payment rate in foreign countries.</p><p>3) State-controlled banks generally have a higher dividend payment rate</p><p>Among 16 listed banks in China, there are five state-controlled banks, including Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of China, China Construction Bank and Bank of Communications. We can calculate the average dividend payment rate between 2010 and 2013 for each bank, and the results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> as follows.</p><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, we can see that the top four of average dividend payment rate are all state-controlled banks, their dividend payment rate are all higher than 30%, at a high level of dividend payment rate, while the other listed banks have a relatively low dividend payment rate, Bank of Beijing, Industrial Bank and PingAn Bank are all less than 20%, especially the PingAn Bank, its average dividend payment rate is only 5.08%.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The average dividend payment rate of listed banks</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2010</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2011</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2012</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2013</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average dividend payment rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.13%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.96%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.24%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.90%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> The average dividend payment rate of listed banks between 2010 and 2013</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Name of bank</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average dividend payment rate (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ranking</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agricultural Bank of China</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >China Construction Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bank of China</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Industrial and Commercial Bank of China</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bank of Nanjing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >China Merchants Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >China Everbright Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shanghai Pudong Development Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bank of Communications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >China Minsheng Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Huaxia Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bank of Ningbo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >China Citic Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bank of Beijing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Industrial Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PingAn Bank</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Empirical Analysis of Dividend Policy Influence Factors of China’s Listed Banks</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Sample Selection and Data Sources</title><p>Because the Agricultural Bank of China and the China Everbright Bank was listed in 2010, in order to ensure the integrity of the data, this article selects the data from 2010 to 2013 as samples. The relevant data are gained from the RESSET database data and the annual report of listed banks, and the tool using for data processing and empirical analysis is Eviews 6.0.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Hypothesis</title><p>There are many factors that can influence a listed bank’s dividend policy, and this article tries to find out the effect of the profitability, the growth ability, the operation capacity, the debt levels and the liquidity of assets by using empirical method. First of all, we need to put forward the following hypothesis:</p><p>Hypothesis 1: The stronger the profitability, the higher the dividend payment rate.</p><p>Dividend is a way for a company to distribute its surplus, to pay back for its shareholders. Therefore, the profitability of a company is one of the important factors affecting its dividend policy. In general, a company has strong profitability can obtain long-term stability of surplus, and is more likely to have a higher dividend payment rate. On the other hand, a company has weak or unstable profitability is more likely to have a lower dividend payment rate. The indicators reflecting a company’s profitability including return on total assets, return on net assets and earnings per share etc. This article selects earnings per share as an indicator for the profitability of listed banks in China.</p><p>Hypothesis 2: The stronger the growth ability, the lower the dividend payment rate.</p><p>A company has strong growth ability often need more money for its development, so it tends to remain its surplus within the company instead of distributing to shareholders. Therefore, a company has strong growth ability is more likely to have a lower dividend payment rate. This article selects earnings per share growth rate to represent the growth ability of listed banks.</p><p>Hypothesis 3: The stronger the operation capacity, the higher the dividend payment rate.</p><p>Operation capacity represents a company’s ability to use money, represents the turnover efficiency of company funds. A company has strong operation capacity can use less money to meet its funding need, therefore it can distribute more surplus to shareholders, that is to say, it often has a higher dividend payment rate. This article selects the total assets turnover ratio as the indicator for listed bank’s operation capacity.</p><p>Hypothesis 4: The higher the debt levels, the lower the dividend payment rate.</p><p>When a company has high debt levels, it often chooses not to pay dividends or pay fewer dividends, because most of its surplus will be used to make a repayment to creditors. So, the higher debt level a company is, the smaller the probability it will pay dividend to shareholders. This article selects the asset-liability ratio as the indicator for listed bank’s debt levels.</p><p>Hypothesis 5: The stronger the liquidity of assets, the higher the dividend payment rate.</p><p>There is a positive correlation between a company’s profitability and liquidity of assets, a company has strong liquidity of assets tends to bring high profit, thus the ability to pay dividends is guaranteed, the dividend payment rate is higher. This article selects operating activities cash flow per share as the indicator for listed bank’s liquidity of assets.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Building and Testing for the Empirical Model</title><p>Based on the above hypothesis and theoretical analysis, this article will analyze the factors affecting the dividend policy of listed banks in China by using multivariate linear regression model. In this model, the explained variable is dividend payment rate, and the explanatory variables are earnings per share, earnings per share growth rate, total assets turnover ratio, asset-liability ratio and operating activities cash flow per share. The specific information of these variables is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> as follows:</p><p>Based on the above definition of variables, we can build the multivariate linear regression model as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.65153-formula853"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/22-1760830x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In this model, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/22-1760830x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is constant term, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/22-1760830x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is regression coefficients of five Explanatory variables, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/22-1760830x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is random error.</p><p>After building the model, we should test the model. Because the panel data used in this article is “wide and short” type, there is no need to carry out the unit root test, but we still need to carry out the F test to find out whether we should use a mixed effect model or a fixed effect model, the F test results by using Eviews 6.0 are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> as follows:</p><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>, we know that the P value of F test is less than 0.05, based on the principle of F test, if the P value is less than 0.05, the fixed effect model is appropriate, so the multivariate linear regression model should</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> The specific information of variables</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Influence factors</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Indicators</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable’s name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Expected symbol<sup>1</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Explanatory variables</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Profitability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Earnings per share</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Growth ability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Earnings per share growth rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Operation capacity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total assets turnover ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Debt levels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asset-liability ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liquidity of assets</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Operating activities cash flow per share</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Explained variable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dividend payment levels</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dividend payment rate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>“+” represents a positive relationship between the variable and the dividend payment rate, and “−”represents a negative relationship between the variable and the dividend payment rate.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Results of F test</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Test cross-section fixed effects</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Effects Test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Statistic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >d.f.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prob.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-section F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.648987</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(15, 43)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0004</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-section Chi-square</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.547689</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>be a fixed effect model.</p><p>Next we carry out the Hausman test to find out whether we should use a fixed effects model or a random effects model, the Hausman test results by using Eviews 6.0 are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> as follows:</p><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>, we know that the P value of Hausman test is less than 0.05, based on the principle of Hausman test, if the P value is less than 0.05, the fixed effect model is appropriate, so the multivariate linear regression model should be a fixed effect model.</p><p>According to the results of F test and Hausman test above, this article will choose a fixed effects model.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Multiple Linear Regression Analysis</title><p>Based on the above model and the test results, we can carry out the multiple linear regression analysis with panel data of 16 listed banks from 2010 to 2013 by using Eviews 6.0, and the results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref> as follows.</p><p>As it is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>, the R2 of the regression analysis is 0.871056, and the adjusted R2 is 0.811082, so the goodness-of-fit of this model can basically accords with the requirement. Besides, the DW value is 2.226460, which is close to 2, so there is no autocorrelation. In addition according to the P values of coefficients, we know that the coefficient of X2 and X3 is not significant, and they are symbolic contrary to expectations, the another three coefficients of variables are significant under the confidence level of 95% and their symbol are the same as expected.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions and Analysis</title><p>According to the results of the above empirical analysis, the hypothesis 1, hypothesis 4 and hypothesis 5 can be accepted, that is to say, the dividend payment rate is positively related to the profitability and the liquidity of assets, and is negatively related to the debt levels. The correlation coefficient between the earnings per share and the dividend payment rate is 0.045395, the correlation coefficient between asset-liability ratio and the dividend payment rate is −3.301119, and the correlation coefficient between the operating activities cash flow per share and the dividend payment rate is 0.003375, so it is clear that asset-liability ratio has greatest influence on dividend payment rate, next is the earnings per share, and the influence of the operating activities cash flow per share is quite small.</p><p>On the other hand, although the correlation coefficient of earnings per share growth rate and total assets turnover ratio didn’t pass the significance test, we can’t simply draw the conclusion that these two factors have no influence on the dividend payment rate, one of the reasons to explain the result is the small quantity of data, of course there are also other reasons.</p><p>The regulators in China are very concerned about the implementation of the dividend policy of listed company, and they have introduced some relevant laws and regulations to guide the listed companies to make the dividend policy in recent years. However, while these laws and regulations are making the dividend policy standard, they are also limiting the free development of the listed companies. According to “the measures for the administration of the issuance of new shares of listed company”, if a listed company haven’t distributed dividends to shareholders for three years and the board can’t offer a reasonable explanation, the security company acting as lead underwriter must pay more attention to it and offer a detailed explanation in the due diligence report while the listed company applying for refinancing. In 2004, a regulation was introduced to forbid the public issuance of stock of listed company which is profitable but hasn’t paid dividend for three years. In 2008, the securities regulatory commission raised a requirement that total cash dividends shall not be less than 30% of the average annual distributable profits in last three years. The growing listed banks may need a lot of money for development, but they can’t choose the most appropriate dividend policy because of the laws and regulations, they have</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Results of Hausman test</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Test cross-section random effects</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Test Summary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chi-Sq. Statistic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chi-Sq. d.f.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prob.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-section random</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.625350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0272</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Results of multiple linear regression analysis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Coefficient</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std. Error</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >t-Statistic</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Prob.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.436610</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.403810</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.448059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0185</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.045395</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.061577</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0453</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.050739</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.043071</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.178044</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2453</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.233077</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.099135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.276630</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2086</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.301119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.442593</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−2.288323</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0271</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001087</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.105224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0034</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R-squared</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.871056</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Mean dependent var</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.390915</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adjusted R-squared</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.811082</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >S.D. dependent var</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.280089</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S.E. of regression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.063243</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sum squared resid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.171989</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F-statistic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.52393</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Durbin-Watson stat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.226460</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prob (F-statistic)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>to find other ways for financing instead of using surplus. This can explain why the growth ability of a company has nothing to do with the dividend policy, because dividend policy is the requirements of laws and regulations, rather than the choice of the listed company.</p><p>The total assets turnover ratio in the financial industry has a certain relationship with the main business types of financial institutions. Compared to the listed securities and insurance companies, the total assets turnover ratio of the listed banks is generally lower, this is its industry characteristics, it has nothing to do with the earnings, so its influence on the dividend policy is also not significant.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Yanqiong Zhong, (2016) Analysis of Dividend Policy Influence Factors of China’s Listed Banks. Open Journal of Social Sciences,04,272-278. doi: 10.4236/jss.2016.43034</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.65153-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dickens, R.N., Casey, K.M. and Newman, J.A. (2002) Bank Dividend Policy: Explanatory Factors. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 41, 3-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65153-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Theis, J. and Dutta, A.S. (2009) Explanatory Factors of Bank Dividend Policy: Revisited. Managerial Finance, 6, 501-508.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65153-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, M.S. (2005) Study of Cash Dividend Distribution of Banking Industry Listed Company. The Second International Symposium on Enterprise Investment and Financing Operation and Management of China, Nankai University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65153-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guo</surname><given-names> Y.Y. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Analysis of the Banking Industry Listed Company’s Cash Dividend Policy</article-title><source> Market Economy and the Price</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 42</fpage>-<lpage>45</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65153-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, Z.W. and Zhao, Y.Q. (2011) Study of Dividend Policy of Listed Banks in China. China Securities and Futures, 5, 18-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.65153-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names> Y. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>Empirical Study of Listed Banks Cash Dividend</article-title><source> Value Engineering</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 147</fpage>-<lpage>148</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>