<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2016.76048</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-64941</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Numerical Solution of System of Fractional Delay Differential Equations Using Polynomial Spline Functions
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ahmoud</surname><given-names>N. Sherif</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Mathematics Department, Faculty of Science and Education, Taif University, Al-Khurmah Branch, Taif, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>nouhmahmoud@yahoo.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>03</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>518</fpage><lpage>526</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>21</month>	<year>March</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The aim of this paper is to approximate the solution of system of fractional delay differential equations. Our technique relies on the use of suitable spline functions of polynomial form. We introduce the description of the proposed approximation method. The error analysis and stability of the method are theoretically investigated. Numerical example is given to illustrate the applicability, accuracy and stability of the proposed method.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Fractional Differential Equation</kwd><kwd> Spline Functions</kwd><kwd> Taylor Expansion</kwd><kwd> Stability</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Recently, the use of various types of spline function in the numerical treatment of ordinary differential equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref5">5</xref>] and delay differential equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref6">6</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref11">11</xref>] has been increasing. Many interesting applications in the area of mathematical biology, mathematical model of numerous engineering and physical phenomena have been studied [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref13">13</xref>] . The fractional differential equation of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula149"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is studied by Kia Dithelm and N. J. Ford [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref14">14</xref>] . In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref16">16</xref>] , the Adams-Bashforth-Moulton method is used to approximate solutions of the initial value problem (1). An alternative is the backward differentiation formula presented in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref17">17</xref>] where the idea of this method is based on discretizing the differential operator in the fractional differential Equation (1) by certain finite difference. Extrapolation principles in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref7">7</xref>] are applied to improve the performance of the method presented in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref17">17</xref>] . Kia Dithelm in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref18">18</xref>] studied that a fast algorithm for the numerical solution of initial value problems of the form (1) in the sense of Caputo identifies and discusses potential problems in the development of generally applicable schemes. More recently, Lagrange multiplier method and the homotopy perturbation method are used to solve numerically multi-order fractional differential equation see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref19">19</xref>] . Micul [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref20">20</xref>] considered the problem</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula150"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> They assume that the functions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfy the Lipschitz condition of the form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula151"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>An extension of the spline functions form defined in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref19">19</xref>] for approximating the solution of system of ordinary differential equations is investigated, namely, for the system (2) with unique solution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><p>considered. The spline functions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to approximate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are defined in poly-</p><p>nomial form as:</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Ramadan, M. A. obtained in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref15">15</xref>] the solution of the first order delay differential equation of the form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula152"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>using the spline function of the polynomial form which defined as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula153"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Ramadan, Z. in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref21">21</xref>] discussed the system of the initial value problem</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula154"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, his method was presented which uses polynomial spline to approximate the solutions of the system.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Description of the Proposed Spline Approximation Method</title><p>Consider the system of first order delay differential equations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula155"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The function g is called the delay function and it is assumed to be continuous on the interval <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and to satisfy the inequality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Suppose that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is continuous and satisfies Lipsechitz condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula156"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and there exists a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula157"><label>, (6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Suppose also that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is continuous and satisfies the Lipsechitz condition:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula158"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and there exists a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula159"><label>, (8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>These conditions assure the existence of unique solution y and z of system (4).</p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a uniform partition to the interval <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined by the nodes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula160"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Define the new form of system of fractional spline function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of polynomial form approximating the exact solution y and z by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula161"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula162"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula163"><label>, (11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula164"><label>, (12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> exist and are unique.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Error Estimation and Convergence Analysis</title><p>To estimate the error of the approximate solution, we write the exact solution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the following Taylor form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref11">11</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula165"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula166"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Moreover, we denote to the estimated error of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at any point <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula167"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denote to the error</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula168"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Define the modulus of continuity of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula169"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Next lemma gives an upper bound to the error.</p><p>Lemma 1</p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are defined as in (15) then there exist constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> independent of h such that the following inequality:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula170"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x73.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>holds for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof</p><p>Using the Lipschitz condition, Taylor expansion, definition of error estimation and (15) we get, by dropping<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula171"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula172"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula173"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula174"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula175"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Similarly,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula176"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the Lipsechitz constant independent of h, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the modulus of continuity of</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The inequality (16) is then reduced to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula177"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is constant independent of h.</p><p>In the same manner we can prove that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula178"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x91.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is constant independent of h.</p><p>The lemma is proved.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Stability Analysis of the Proposed Method</title><p>For analyzing the stability properties of the given method, we make a small change of the starting values and study the changes in the numerical solution produced by the method.</p><p>Now, we define the spline approximating function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula179"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula180"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x95.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and use the notation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula181"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x102.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula182"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x103.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 2</p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be defined as in (19) and (20), then the inequalities</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula183"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x106.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula184"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>holds where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are constants independent of h.</p><p>Proof</p><p>Using Lipsechitz condition and (9), (17), (19) and (20) we get, by dropping a:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula185"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x110.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>but</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula186"><label>. (22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x111.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Thus from (21) and (22) we obtain:</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is constant independent of h.</p><p>In the same manner we can prove that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula187"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x115.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is constant independent of h. Thus the lemma is proved.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Numerical Example</title><p>Consider the system of fractional ordinary delay differential equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula188"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.64941-formula189"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x119.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The exact solution is given by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The obtained numerical results are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> to illustrate the accuracy and the stability of the proposed spline method using spline function of polynomial form. The first column in each table, represents the different values of a, the second column represents the values of x. The third column gives the approximate solution at the corresponding points while the fourth column gives the absolute error between the exact solution and the obtained approximate numerical solution with the initial conditions<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. With small change in the initial conditions, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-7402963x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the approximate solution is computed as</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The accuracy and stability of the proposed spline method using spline function of polynomial form (using h = 0.01)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute diff. between the two Appr. solutions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Appr. solution for the perturbed problem</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute Error</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Appr. solution for the problem</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >x</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50275 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 2.33452 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 3.03307 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 3.66017 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 4.24062 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000925771 0.00286047 0.00555184 0.00890311 0.0128568</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> 4.7 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 7.3 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 1.0 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 0.000925756 y = 0.00286044 y = 0.00555181 y = 0.00890308 y = 0.0128567</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.30474 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 1.54803 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 2.09326 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 2.59856 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 3.07735 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000540099 0.00178793 0.00361276 0.0059613 0.00880111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> 1.4 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> 2.7 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 4.4 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 6.1 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 0.00054009 y = 0.00178791 y = 0.00361274 y = 0.00596128 y = 0.00880108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.71685 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 1.01865 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 1.43368 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 1.83092 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 2.21638 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000313707 0.00111263 0.00234066 0.00397413 0.0059986</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> 7.1 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> 1.4 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 2.4 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 3.5 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 0.000313701 y = 0.00111262 y = 0.00234065 y = 0.00397411 y = 0.00599858</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4872 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 6.65526 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 9.74972 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 1.28095 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 1.58509 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000181441 0.000689483 0.00151013 0.0026383 0.00407143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup> 2.9 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> 6.1 &#215; 10<sup>−4 </sup> 1.0 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 1.0 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 0.000181438 y = 0.000689476 y = 0.00151012 y = 0.00263828 y = 0.00407141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11285 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 4.31917 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 6.58633 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 8.90272 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 1.12616 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000104516 0.000425537 0.000970365 0.00174444 0.00275232</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5 &#215; 10<sup>−6</sup> 2.6 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup> 7.0 &#215; 10<sup>−5 </sup> 1.4 &#215; 10<sup>−4 </sup> 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >y = 0.000104514 y = 0.000425532 y = 0.000970359 y = 0.00174443 y = 0.00275231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The accuracy and stability of the proposed spline method using spline function of polynomial form (using h = 0.01)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute diff. between the two Appr. solutions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Appr. solution for the perturbed problem</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute Error</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Appr. Solution for the problem</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >X</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50275 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 2.33452 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 3.03307 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 3.66017 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 4.24062 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000925771 0.00286047 0.00555184 0.00890311 0.0128568</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> 4.7 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 7.3 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 1.0 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >z = 0.000925756 z = 0.00286044 z = 0.00555181 z = 0.00890308 z = 0.0128567</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.30474 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 1.54803 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 2.09326 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 2.59856 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 3.07735 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000540099 0.00178793 0.00361276 0.0059613 0.00880111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> 1.4 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> 2.7 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 4.4 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 6.1 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >z = 0.00054009 z = 0.00178791 z = 0.00361274 z = 0.00596128 z = 0.00880108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.71685 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 1.01865 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 1.43368 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 1.83092 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 2.21638 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000313707 0.00111263 0.00234066 0.00397413 0.0059986</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> 7.1 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> 1.4 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 2.4 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 3.5 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >z = 0.000313701 z = 0.00111262 z = 0.00234065 z = 0.00397411 z = 0.00599858</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4872 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 6.65526 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 9.74972 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 1.28095 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> 1.58509 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000181441 0.000689483 0.00151013 0.0026383 0.00407143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup> 2.9 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> 6.1 &#215; 10<sup>−4 </sup> 1.0 &#215; 10<sup>−3 </sup> 1.0 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >z = 0.000181438 z = 0.000689476 z = 0.00151012 z = 0.00263828 z = 0.00407141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11285 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 4.31917 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 6.58633 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 8.90272 &#215; 10<sup>−9</sup> 1.12616 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000104516 0.000425537 0.000970365 0.00174444 0.00275232</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5 &#215; 10<sup>−6</sup> 2.6 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup> 7.0 &#215; 10<sup>−5 </sup> 1.4 &#215; 10<sup>−4 </sup> 2.5 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >z = 0.000104514 z = 0.000425532 z = 0.000970359 z = 0.00174443 z = 0.00275231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>shown in the fifth column. To test the stability, the difference between the two approximate solutions is computed as shown in the six column</p><p>From the obtained results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> respectively, we can see that the proposed method gives acceptable accuracy and the method is shown to be stable. Moreover, the algorithm of the proposed method has recursive nature which makes it easy and simple to be programmed.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>We adapt the spline functions with some additional assumptions and definitions for approximating the solution of system of ordinary delay differential equation with fractional order which studied in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64941-ref8">8</xref>] . The error analysis and stability are theoretically investigated. A numerical example is given to illustrate the applicability, accuracy and stability of the proposed method. The obtained numerical results reveal that the methods are stable and give high accuracy.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mahmoud N. Sherif,1 1, (2016) Numerical Solution of System of Fractional Delay Differential Equations Using Polynomial Spline Functions. Applied Mathematics,07,518-526. doi: 10.4236/am.2016.76048</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.64941-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Loscalzo, F.R. (1969) An Introduction to the Application of Spline Function to Initial Value Problems. In: Greville, T.N.E., Ed., Theory and Applications of Spline Functions, Academic Press, New York, 37-64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Loscalzo, F.R. and Tabot, T.D. (1967) Spline Function Approximations for Solutions of Ordinary Differential Equations. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 73, 708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9904-1967-11778-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meir, A. and Sharma, A. (1973) Spline Functions and Approximation Theory. BirkhauserVerlag, Basel-Stuttgart. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5979-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saad, B. (1966) Error of Arbitrary Order Method for Solving n-th Order Differential Equations by Spline Functions. PhD Thesis, Tanta University, Egypt.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sherif, M.N., Abouelfarag, I. and Amer, T.S. (2014) Numerical Solution of Fractional Delay Differential Equations Using Spline Functions. IJPAM, 90, 73-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v90i1.10</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joakim, M. (2004) Riemann-Liouville Fractional Derivatives and the Taylor-Riemann Series. Department of Math. Uppsala University UUDM. Project Report 7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ramadan</surname><given-names> M.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>Spline Solution of First Order Delay Differential Equation</article-title><source> Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society</source><volume> 1</volume>,<fpage> 7</fpage>-<lpage>18</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ramadan</surname><given-names> M.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Numerical Treatment of the Second Ordinary Delay Differential Equations by Spline Functions</article-title><source> Proceeding of the Mathematical and Physical Society of Egypt</source><volume> 85</volume>,<fpage> 49</fpage>-<lpage>60</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramadan, M.A., Mokhtar, A., Abdel-Naby, M. and Taher, S. (2005) Spline Approximation for Second Order System of Delay Differential Equations. Journal of the Egyptian Mathematical Society, 13, 177-188.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramadan, M.A., El-sherbeiny, A. and Sherif, M.N. (2009) The Use of Polynomial Spline Functions for the Solution of System of Second Order Delay Differential Equations. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 86, 1167-1181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207160701769617</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramadan, M.A., Danaf, T.E. and Sherif, M.N. (2012) Error Analysis, Stability, and Numerical Solutions of Fractional—Order Differential Equations. IJPAM, 647-659, 76,5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eyaad, A. and Elgazzar, A.S. (2007) On Fractional Order Differential Equations Model for Nonlocal Epidemics. Physica A, 379, 607-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.01.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eyaad, A., El-Sayed, A.M.A. and Elsaka, H.A.A. (2007) Equilibrium Point, Stability, and Numerical Solutions of Fractional-Order Predator-Prey and Rabies Models. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 325, 542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.01.087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dithelm, K. and Neville, J.F. (2003) Analysis of Fractional Differential Equation. The University of Manchester, Numerical Analysis Report 377.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Dithelm, K. and Freed, A.D. (1999) The FracPECE Subroutine for the Numerical Solution of Differential Equations of Fractions Order. In: Heinzel, S. and Plesser, T., Eds., Forschung und Wiessenschaftliches Rechnen 1998, GWDG-Bericht, Gesellschaftfur Wiessenschaftliches Datenverabeitung, Gottingen, 57-71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Dithelm, K. and Freed, A.D. (1999) On the of Solution of Nonlinear Differential Equations Used in the Modeling of Viscoplasticity. In: Keil, F., Mackens, W., Vob, H. and Werther, J., Eds., Scientific Computing in Chemical Engineering II-Computational Fluid Dynamics Reaction Engineering, and Molecular Properties, Springer, Heidelberg, 217-224.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dithelm</surname><given-names> K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1997</year>)<article-title>An Algorithm for the Numerical Solution of Differential Equations of Fractions Order</article-title><source> Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>6</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dithelm, K., Judith, M.F., Neville, J.F. and Weilbeer, M. (2006) Pitfalls in Fast Numerical Solvers for Fractions Differential Equations. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 186, 482-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2005.03.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sweilam, N.M., Khader, M.M. and Al-Bar, R.F. (2007) Numerical Studies for a Multi-Order Fractional Differential Equation. Physics Letters A, 371, 26-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2007.06.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Micula, G., Fawzy, T. and Ramadan, Z. (1987) A Polynomial Spline Approximation. Method for Solving System of Ordinary Differential Equations. Babes-Bolyai Cluj-Napoca Mathematica, 4, 55-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64941-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rmadan</surname><given-names> Z. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>On the Numerical Solution of a System of Third Order Ordinary Differential Equations by Spline Functions. Ann Univ Sect</article-title><source> Comput</source><volume> 19</volume>,<fpage> 155</fpage>-<lpage>167</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>