<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2016.76044</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-64929</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Multiyear Discrete Stochastic Programming with a Fuzzy Semi-Markov Process
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>.</surname><given-names>S. Kim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Richard</surname><given-names>M. Adams</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dannele</surname><given-names>E. Peck</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Applied Economics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>ckim@ers.usda.gov(.SK)</email>;<email>Richard.adams@oregonstate.edu(RMA)</email>;<email>dpeck@uwyo.edu(DEP)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>03</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>482</fpage><lpage>495</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>20</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>21</month>	<year>March</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Drought conditions at a given location evolve randomly through time and are typically characterized by severity and duration. Researchers interested in modeling the economic effects of drought on agriculture or other water users often capture the stochastic nature of drought and its conditions via multiyear, stochastic economic models. Three major sources of uncertainty in application of a multiyear discrete stochastic model to evaluate user preparedness and response to drought are: (1) the assumption of independence of yearly weather conditions, (2) linguistic vagueness in the definition of drought itself, and (3) the duration of drought. One means of addressing these uncertainties is to re-cast drought as a stochastic, multiyear process using a “fuzzy” semi-Markov process. In this paper, we review “crisp” versus “fuzzy” representations of drought and show how fuzzy semi-Markov processes can aid researchers in developing more robust multiyear, discrete stochastic models.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Drought</kwd><kwd> Discrete Stochastic Economic Modeling</kwd><kwd> Fuzzy Logic</kwd><kwd> Fuzzy Markov Process</kwd><kwd> Fuzzy Semi-Markov Process</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Severity and duration of drought in California (Source: The National Drought Miti- gation Center―USDA).</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x8.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Linguistic Vagueness and Fuzzy Logic</title><p>To evaluate the impacts of drought conditions and associated preparedness and response plans, a clear definition of drought must be provided. One definition of drought is the case in which irrigation water supplied is less than irrigation water demanded, due to inadequate rainfall, snow pack, or other weather conditions. As the difference between irrigation water demanded and supplied increases, severity of drought intensifies along a continuous gradient. While the characterization of drought varies across studies, the following definition of drought pro- vided by Yevjevich [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref14">14</xref>] has been widely used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref16">16</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64929-formula607"><label>, (2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a constant water allotment threshold (such as 40 acre-inches Peck and Adams [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref3">3</xref>] used for water allotment under normal weather condition) and S<sub>i</sub> is the ith severity state. A Bernoulli variable y<sub>i</sub> plays a significant role in estimation of the holding time (i.e., duration) probability mass function of drought in later section of semi-Markov chains.</p><p>When economic models represent drought in binary terms (i.e., a water allocation either qualifies or does not qualify as drought), this overly-simplified or deceivingly-crisp (as opposed to fuzzy) measurement of drought severity can cause inefficient resource allocation. Unlike this crisp set (in which an element is either a member of the set or not), fuzzy sets allow elements to be included through a degree of membership, as expressed by a membership function, thus relaxing the binary state assumption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref17">17</xref>] . Introduced by Zadeh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref18">18</xref>] , fuzzy logic and fuzzy set theory have since been widely adopted to deal with linguistic vagueness in various mathematical optimization models, including fuzzy dynamic programming [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref20">20</xref>] , and optimal fuzzy control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64929-formula608"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Fuzzy Markov and Semi-Markov Processes</title><p>Definition 2. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a finite state-space of possible water allotments from an irrigation</p><p>water district. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be random variables taking values in W. Now, let a fuzzy subset of W be defined as</p><p>a set of ordered pairs<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the grade of membership of S<sub>i</sub> in W in the mth transition.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64929-formula609"><label>, (3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the fuzzy-state grade of membership, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, can be calculated as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64929-formula610"><label>, (3.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the powers of the fuzzy transition matrix, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, are defined by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64929-formula611"><label>, (3.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an identity matrix at the initial time period.</p><p>A few empirical studies have been conducted to compare efficiencies between the use of classic Markov chains based on conventional crisp set theory and fuzzy Markov chains in the context of stochastic programming models. Mousavi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref20">20</xref>] compared a conventional stochastic dynamic programming model (which employed classic Markov chains) and a fuzzy-state stochastic dynamic programming model (which employed fuzzy Markov chains) in the operation of a multipurpose reservoir in Iran. Results from their study show that fuzzy- state stochastic dynamic programming outperforms conventional stochastic dynamic programming in achieving the flood control objective and in overall performance of the reservoir. Chandramouli and Nanduri [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref27">27</xref>] also compared a conventional stochastic dynamic model and a fuzzy-state stochastic dynamic model in the operation of a multipurpose reservoir in India. They found that the fuzzy-state stochastic dynamic programming model out performed the conventional stochastic dynamic programming model.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Fuzzy Semi-Markov Process</title><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Homogeneous Fuzzy Semi-Markov Process<sub> </sub></title><p>where S<sup>n</sup> represents the state at the nth transition, T<sub>n</sub> is the time of the nth transition and “t” is arrival time. Equation (3.5) expresses the probability of transitioning to state j at arrival time t, given the system has been in state i after n transitions. Unfortunately no solution has been reported for Equation (3.5) in the literature; therefore, an alternative approach for solving Equation (3.5) has been employed by Cancelliere and Salas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref15">15</xref>] and Mirakbari and Ganji [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64929-formula612"><label>(3.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> represents the probability of the duration d<sub>ij</sub> in the ith drought severity, before moving to the jth</p><p>drought severity. This is estimated by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the mean holding-time (i.e., duration) in the ith</p><p>drought before moving to the jth drought, which can be easily observed from historical data.</p><p>Mirakbari and Ganji [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref6">6</xref>] compared performances between the classic semi-Markov chains and the fuzzy semi- Markov chains by using profust reliability theory to a rangeland system in India.6 Their results indicate that the reliability of rangeland system decisions increased by 22 percent when the fuzzy semi-Markov process is used over the classic semi-Markov process.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. Non-Homogeneous Fuzzy Semi-Markov Process</title><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the transition probability of the embedded fuzzy Markov chain in the process.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64929-formula613"><label>(3.17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Numerical Example</title><p>We now present a numerical example of multiyear water supply forecasts under the assumption that a pair of two random variables {S<sub>n</sub>, T<sub>n</sub>} follows a homogeneous fuzzy semi-Markov process (i.e., Equation (3.5) through (3.12)).7 The multiyear forecast associated with the severity and duration of droughts can be incorporated into a multiyear discrete stochastic programming model as shown in Equation (3.12).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64929-formula614"><label>(4.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x96.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula>Comparison<p>Due to the lagging and long-term effects of drought on vegetation and soil moisture, or on cropping choices due to agronomic constraints (e.g., rotations), the resilience of drought is equal to or longer than drought duration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref38">38</xref>] .9 Therefore, economic impacts of individual years of drought may not necessarily be independent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64929-ref3">3</xref>] . To compare multiyear drought probabilities between a conventional multiyear discrete stochastic program (which typically assumes the previous year’s state of nature does not influence the probability of future states of nature) and a multiyear homogeneous fuzzy semi-Markov process, the steady-state probabilities of the fuzzy transition matrix in Equation (4.2) are estimated as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64929-formula615"><label>(4.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x102.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where π is a stationary distribution.1<sup>0</sup> The probabilities in Equation (4.4) represent P<sub>k</sub> (k = 1, 2, 3) in Equation (1.3). In a conventional discrete stochastic programming model, the probability of severe drought (SEE) in the</p><p>first year, as well as in the second year, or any other year, is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, such that the probability of two consecutive years of severe drought is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, while the probability of three consecutive years of severe drought is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-7402944x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The possibility mass function of the holding-time spent in each weather condition in a fuzzy semi-Markov</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Results of a numerical example</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Duration</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weather</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Model</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >d = 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >d = 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >d = 3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FsM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>1</sub>(d = 1) = 0.3333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>1</sub>(d = 2) = 0.2222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>1</sub>(d = 3) = 0.1481</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DSPM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0370</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FsM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>(d = 1) = 0.3000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>(d = 2) = 0.2222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>(d = 3) = 0.1481</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DSPM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0370</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >FsM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>3</sub>(d = 1) = 0.2500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>3</sub>(d = 2) = 0.1875</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>3</sub>(d = 3) = 0.1406</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DSPM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0370</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>N = Normal; MM = Mild/Moderate drought; SEE = Severe/Extreme/Exceptional drought. FsM = Fuzzy semi-Markov; DSPM = Discrete Stochastic Programming Model.</p><p>process is estimated with Equation (3.11) and results are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. In contrast to a conventional discrete stochastic programming model, the possibility of two consecutive years of SEE drought condition is 0.1875, which is 69 percent higher than the probability assumed in a conventional multiyear discrete stochastic programming approach. As the duration of consecutive years of severe drought increases to three years, the possibility of holding time in a fuzzy semi-Markov process is 0.1406, which is 280 percent higher than the probability assumed in a conventional multiyear discrete stochastic programming approach, 0.0370.</p><p>Implementation of adequate measures to control or mitigate drought consequences is a major challenge for irrigators and other water users. Our numerical example, while stylized, demonstrates how economists can use fuzzy semi-Markov processes to incorporate uncertainty about both severity of drought (which necessitates fuzzy sets) and duration of a multiyear drought (which necessitates semi-Markov processes) in stochastic modeling by using a fuzzy semi-Markov process. Such model specification may improve representation of the economic effects of drought severity and duration on water users and the efficacy of alternative mitigation actions.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Summary</title></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to USDA or Economic Research Service.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>C. S.Kim,Richard M.Adams,Dannele E.Peck, (2016) Multiyear Discrete Stochastic Programming with a Fuzzy Semi-Markov Process. Applied Mathematics,07,482-495. doi: 10.4236/am.2016.76044</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.64929-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Engelhardt, T. (1983) Water Supply Optimization with Discrete Stochastic Linear Programming. Proceedings of International Crops Research Institute Workshop on the State of the Art and Management Alternatives for Optimizing the Productivity of SAT Alfisols and Related Soils, ICRISAT Center, 1-3 December 1983, Patancheru, India, 79-87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McCarl, B. and Parandvash, G. (1988) Irrigation Development versus Hydroelectric Generation: Can Interruptible Irrigation Play a Role? Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 13, 267-276.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peck, D.E. and Adams, R.M. (2010) Farm-Level Impacts of Prolonged Drought: Is a Multiyear Event More than the Sum of Its Parts? The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54, 43-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2009.00478.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cocks, K.D. (1968) Discrete Stochastic Programming. Management Science, 15, 72-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.15.1.72</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Watanabe, Y. (1987) Errors in Availability Estimation by 2-State Models of 3-State Systems. Reliability Engineering, 18, 223-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0143-8174(87)90100-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mirakbari, M. and Ganji, A. (2010) Reliability Analysis of a Rangeland System: The Application of Profust Theory. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 24, 399-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00477-009-0329-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahinidis, N. (2004) Optimization under Uncertainty: State-of-the-Art and Opportunities. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 28, 971-983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2003.09.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fullér, R. (1998) Fuzzy Reasoning and Fuzzy Optimization. Department of Operations, E&amp;#246;tv&amp;#246;s Loránd University, Budapest.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Inuiguchi, M. and Ramit, J. (2000) Possibilistic Linear Programming: A Brief Review of Fuzzy Mathematical Programming and a Comparison with Stochastic Programming in Portfolio Selection Problem. Fuzzy Sets and System, 111, 3-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00449-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tanaka, H., Okuda, T. and Asai, K. (1974) Decision Making and Information in Fuzzy Events. Bulletin Series A, 23, 193-202.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Li, H. and Gong, Z. (2010) Fuzzy Linear Programming with Possibility and Necessity Relation. In: Cao, et al., Eds., Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 305-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14880-4_32</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, Y.F., Baetz, B.W., Huang, G.H. and Liu, L. (2002) Violation Analysis for Solid Waste Management Systems: An Interval Fuzzy Programming Approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 65, 431-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(02)90566-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arkov, V., Kulikov, G.G. and Breikin, T.V. (1999) Fuzzy Markov Modeling in Automatic Control of Complex Dynamic Systems. International Conference on Accelerator and Large Experimental Physics Control Systems, 4-8 October 1999, Trieste, 287-289.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yevjevich, V. (1967) An Objective Approach to Definitions and Investigations to Continental Hydrologic Droughts. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cancelliere, A. and Salas, J.D. (2004) Drought Length Properties for Periodic-Stochastic Hydrologic Data. Water Resources Research, 40, W02503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002wr001750</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Llamas, J. and Siddiqui, M. (1969) Runs of Precipitation Series. Hydrology Paper 33, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cai, K.Y., Wen, C.U. and Zhang, M.L. (1993) Fuzzy States as a Basis for a Theory of Fuzzy Reliability. Journal of Microelectronics Reliability, 33, 2253-2263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0026-2714(93)90065-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zadeh, L.A. (1965) Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bellman, R.E. and Zadeh, L.A. (1970) Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment. Management Science, 17, 141-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mousavi, S., Karamouz, K. and Menhadj, M.B. (2004) Fuzzy-State Stochastic Dynamic Programming for Reservoir Operation. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 130, 460-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:6(460)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baten, M.A. and Kamil, A.A. (2012) Optimal Fuzzy Control with Application to Discounted Cost Production Inventory Planning Problem. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol. III, London, 30 June-2 July 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khedun, C.P. and Singh, V. (2014) Drought Risk Management in Agriculture: Current Trends in Research. Texas A&amp;M University, College Station.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alves, A., Mota, G., Costa, G. and Feitosa, R. (2012) Estimation of Transition Possibilities for Fuzzy Markov Chains Applied to the Analysis of Multitemporal Image Sequences. Proceedings of the 4th GEOBIA, Rio de Janeiro, 7-9 May 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Praba, B., Sujatha, R. and Srikrishna, S. (2009) A Study on Homogeneous Fuzzy Semi-Markov Model. Applied Mathematical Science, 3, 2453-2467.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Avranchenkov, K. and Sanche, E. (2002) Fuzzy Markov Chains and Decision-Making. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 1, 143-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015729400380</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schweizer, P.J. (1968) Pertubation Theory and Finite Markov Chains. Journal of Applied Probability, 5, 401-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3212261</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chandramouli, S. and Nanduri, U. (2011) Comparison of Stochastic and Fuzzy Dynamic Programming Models for the Operation of a Multipurpose Reservoir. Water and Environment Journal, 25, 547-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2011.00255.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bardossy, A. and Plate, E.J. (1991) Modeling Daily Rainfall Using a Semi-Markov Representation of Circulation Pattern Occurrence. Journal of Hydrology, 122, 33-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(91)90170-M</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Masruroh, N. (2012) Introduction to Discrete Time Semi Markov Process.http://slideplayer.com/slide/4757341/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Praba, B., Sujatha, R. and Srikrishna, S. (2009) Fuzzy Reliability Measures of Fuzzy Probabilistic Semi-Markov Model. International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, 2, 25-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vassiliou, P.C. (2013) Fuzzy Semi-Markov Migration Process in Credit Risk. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 223, 39-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2013.02.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Medici, J.J. and Manca, R. (2012) The Aggregate Claim Amount Discrete Time Semi-Markov Model. Working Paper, Department of Mathematics of Economic Decisions on Finance and Insurance, University of Rome, La Sapienza.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Janssen, J., Manca, R. and di Prignano, E.V. (2012) Non Homogeneous Interest Rate Structure in a Semi-Markov Framework. Working Paper. http://www.actuaries.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gildeh, B.S. and Dadgar, A. (2007) Reducible Fuzzy Markov Chain and Fuzzy Absorption Probability. 1st Joint Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Systems, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran, 29-31August 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, J. and He, P. (2010) The Application of Fuzzy Markov Chains in the Analysis of Internet Glance Behavior. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology (ICCSIT), Vol. 7, Chengdu, 9-11 July 2010, 608-611.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanchez, E. (1976) Resolution of Composite Fuzzy Relation Equation. Information and Control, 30, 38-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(76)90446-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meenakshi, A.R. and Kaliraja, M. (2010) Regular Interval Valued Fuzzy Matrices. Advances in Fuzzy Mathematics, 5, 7-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64929-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rossi, G., Benedini, M., Tsakiris, G. and Giakoumakis, S. (1992) On Regional Drought Estimation and Analysis. Water Resources Management, 6, 249-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00872280</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>