<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1945-3094</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2016.83027</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP-64888</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Influence of Fertilizers on Groundwater Quality in Gaza Strip&lt;br/&gt;—Free Settlements on Khan Younis—Case Study
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>unes</surname><given-names>Mogheir</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Salahaldin</surname><given-names>Abu Abdou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samir</surname><given-names>Matar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Environmental Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza, Palestine</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Municipal Development and Lending Fund (MDLF), Gaza, Palestine</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Faculty, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza, Palestine</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>yunesmogheir@yahoo.com(UM)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>03</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>330</fpage><lpage>336</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>20</month>	<year>March</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The Palestinian Ministry of Agriculture started the agricultural investment in some free settlements in Gaza strip since 2008. The proposed areas to be planted and the proposed crops were chosen randomly without any researches to study the expected adverse impacts of these agricultural projects on the environmental components. This research aimed at the groundwater aquifer in the proposed region physically and chemically by taking five water samples from water wells in the place. Represented groundwater samples taken from observation wells in the study area were tested in term of total dissolved solids (TDS), electric conductivity (EC), and (N-P-K) concentrations to be compared with the regulated groundwater standards. As a result of testing two fertilizers, it is found that the announced concentrations of (N-P-K) don’t match the real results. The real results are less than the announced concentrations, especially for the phosphorus concentration which had a real result about half of the announced concentration for both fertilizers. Although the real concentrations of (N-P-K) in the used fertilizers are less the announced concentrations, slightly pollution is found in the groundwater aquifer. The groundwater testing results in five observation wells showed that the groundwater tends to be basic, high salinity ranged between 550 and 3500 μS/cm, and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) results ranged between 330 and 2300. Nitrate results ranged between 65 and 160 ppm, whereas phosphorus and potassium results showed that all groundwater samples met the standards and didn’t exceed them.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Free Settlements</kwd><kwd> Khan Younis</kwd><kwd> Groundwater Aquifer Quality</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Groundwater is the most important water resource on earth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64888-ref1">1</xref>] . The quality of groundwater is generally under a considerable potential of pollution especially in agriculture dominated areas with intense activities that involve the use of fertilizers and pesticides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64888-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64888-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Groundwater is the main and sole water resource in the Gaza Strip. The aquifer is intensively exploited through more than four thousand illegal pumping wells, so that the aquifer has been affected by seawater intrusion in many locations in the Gaza Strip. It was estimated that approximately 150 Mm<sup>3</sup>/yr water was pumped from about 4100 wells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64888-ref4">4</xref>] , of which about 90 Mm<sup>3</sup>/yr water was used for irrigation and 60 Mm<sup>3</sup>/yr was pumped for domestic and industrial uses from 100 municipal wells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64888-ref5">5</xref>] . Salinity of the groundwater increases over time due to seawater intrusion and mobilization of incident deep brackish water caused by over abstraction of the groundwater. In most parts of the Gaza Strip, the chloride and nitrate content of domestic water exceeds the WHO guidelines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64888-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Palestinian occupied lands in Gaza strip, which became free since 2005 after the Israeli withdraw, were partially used for agricultural purposes. The estimated areas of the free lands are 26,000 dunums (about 7% of the Gaza strip area), whereas the surrounding areas of the free settlements which also were occupied estimated about 52,000 dunums (about 14% of the Gaza Strip area). Totally, about 78,000 dunums are owned to the Palestinian government in the free settlements, and another 7.4% of the Gaza strip area are owned to Palestinian farmers since 2005 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64888-ref7">7</xref>] . MOA started a group of agricultural projects in various areas in free settlements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64888-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>The two main used fertilizers are called (13-13-13) to indicate the percentages of the three main nutrients N = 13%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> = 13%, and K<sub>2</sub>O = 13%, and (11-8-22) to indicate the percentage of the same nutrients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64888-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Twenty six of water wells were created in free settlements; they discharge about 6 million m<sup>3</sup>/year, and about 2.5 million m<sup>3</sup>/year water is used for plantation projects. This water has characteristics of high quality. The chloride concentration is not more than 350 ppm in all free settlements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64888-ref10">10</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. The Study Area</title><p>The Gaza Strip is one of the most densely populated areas in the world (2638 people per km<sup>2</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64888-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>The study area is the general administration lands in free settlements which located west of Khan younes governor. Its area is about 240 dunum, and the coordinates of the study area center are (x = 81011.061209, y = 2367011.684823) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The study area contains small five wells into and surrounding its boundary, as well as five municipal wells are located around the study area. The irrigation process in study area depends on the fifth municipal wells, whereas the five groundwater wells can be used for small purposes such as drinking or washing. The five small wells can be used for groundwater observations.</p><p>The study area is planted by many types of plants and fruits, in this study, four types of plants and four types of trees are studied to observe the potential effects of their fertilizers on the groundwater aquifer.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Proposed Water Samples</title><p>Six water samples were collected to be tested chemically. Five of water samples were collected from observation wells located inside the study area or just beside it, whereas the sixth water sample was collected from the water irrigation reservoir which used to irrigate the agricultural lands inside the study case. The collected water samples were stored in appropriate bottles and transferred to Coastal Municipal Water Utility (CMWU) labs to be tested in the same day.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Water Tested Parameters</title><p>Group of chemical tests were proceeded to test the quality of water source which feed the study area, and some surrounding groundwater wells. It is worth mentioning that seven municipal water wells are used to irrigate this study area, all of them are collected in one huge reservoir that serves the whole area, thus one sample from the reservoir was enough to be tested in term of pH concentration, electric conductivity, and nitrogen-phosphor- ous-potassium concentrations. In the other hand five small groundwater wells are used for observations, one</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Water wells in the study area</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402684x6.png"/></fig><p>water sample was taken from each of the five observation wells to be tested in term of the same the same last mentioned parameters.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Fertilizers</title><p>The results of two types of fertilizers which contain mainly the nutrients (N-P-K) are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The first fertilizer is called (13-13-13) to indicate the percentages of the three main nutrients N, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, and K<sub>2</sub>O respectively, and the second fertilizer is called (11-8-22) to indicate the percentage of the same nutrients. According to the chemical tests, results explain that the announced percentages are not true, and the real results are less than announced. In this paper, the real results were used for all calculations.</p><p>The quantity of fertilizers used for the four crops are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> for plants and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> for fruits. These quantities are approximately estimated by the in charge engineer in the study area, they indicate the total quantity of both main fertilizers (13-13-13) and (11-8-22) used annually for each crop. Some of crops have one time life cycle per year such as pepper, whereas other crops have two life cycles or more in one year such as tomato (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows the quantities of pure main nutrients (N-P-K) used annually in the plants crops. It worth to mention that these quantities represent the pure nutrients feed by the chemical fertilizers only.</p><p>It is noted that cucumber land has more nutrients than other plants; it refers to the quantities of used fertilizers used annually for cucumber land and it is noted that cucumber land is planted two times annually, so that it has two rounds of fertilizers annually, whereas the pepper land has the lowest quantities of nutrients, it also refers to the annual quantities of used fertilizers for pepper land for one time annually (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>In the other hand, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> shows the quantity of pure nutrients (N-P-K) used annually for tree crops. The quantities indicate the chemical fertilizers only.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Results of chemical tests for used fertilizers</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Item</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Announced 1<sup>st</sup> Fertilizer (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Real 1<sup>st</sup> Fertilizer (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Announced 2<sup>nd</sup> Fertilizer (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Real 2<sup>nd</sup> Fertilizer (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P as P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K as K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Quantity of fertilizers used for the proposed crops</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Crop</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Quantity of fertilizers used (kg/year/du)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13-13-13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11-8-22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potato</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tomato</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cucumber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pepper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Quantity of fertilizers used for the proposed crops</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Crop</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Quantity of fertilizers used (kg/year/du)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13-13-13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11-8-22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mango</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Quantity of pure nutrients used annually for the plant crops</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402684x7.png"/></fig><p>It is noted that Mango, Plum, and Apple lands have the same quantities of nutrients annually, this can be explained that these lands have the same type of fertilizers, and for two rounds annually, whereas the orange land has more nutrients than other fruit lands, it refers to the annual used quantities of fertilizers in the orange land.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Water Irrigation Source</title><p>The water source used for irrigation is taken from seven different groundwater wells located around the study area; the collected water is mixed before irrigation. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> shows the results of chemical potential pollutants in the water source used for irrigation.</p><p>It is found that the water source meet the Palestinian regulatory standards amended by Environmental Quality Authority in 2010.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Quantity of pure nutrients used annually for the plant crops</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >Nutrient</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >K<sub>2</sub>O</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup> stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup> stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup> stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> stage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Percentage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cucumber (kg/du/year)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fertilizer Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nutrient Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5.175</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >23.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Tomato (kg/du/year)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fertilizer Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nutrient Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Pepper (kg/du/year)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fertilizer Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nutrient Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Potato (kg/du/year)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fertilizer Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nutrient Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Quantity of pure nutrients used annually for the plant crops</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402684x8.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Quantity of pure nutrients used annually for the fruit crops</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >Nutrient</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >K<sub>2</sub>O</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup> stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup> stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup> stage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2<sup>nd</sup> stage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Percentage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Orange (kg/du/year)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fertilizer Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nutrient Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >11.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >18.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mango (kg/du/year)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fertilizer Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nutrient Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >6.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Plum (kg/du/year)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fertilizer Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nutrient Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >6.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Apple (kg/du/year)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fertilizer Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nutrient Quantity</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >6.76</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical and physical characteristics of water irrigation source</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Item</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Result</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Regulatory Standard</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5 - 9.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EC (&#181;S/Cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >955</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TDS (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PO<sub>4</sub> (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO<sub>3</sub>-N (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical and physical characteristics of groundwater aquifer in the study area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Well</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EC (&#181;S/Cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TDS (mg/L)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al-Rahma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3550</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2270</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kwaiti</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1430</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Edart Al-Muhararat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2670</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1700</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al-Hashash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >745</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >450</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al-Qassam</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >565</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard Value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Well</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO<sub>3</sub>-N (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PO<sub>4</sub> (mg/L)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K (mg/L)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al-Rahma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kwaiti</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Edart Al-Muhararat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al-Hashash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >164</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al-Qassam</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard Value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Groundwater at Study Area</title><p>The groundwater at the study area is tested to evaluate if the chemical fertilizers pollute the near groundwater aquifer, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> shows the results of chemical and physical characteristics of five various wells are located in and around the study area, and compared with the regulatory standard value.</p><p>It is found the most chemical and physical characteristics such as pH, PO<sub>4</sub>, and K meet the regulatory standard values, but the salinity of water in some cases does not meet the natural salinity standard as in Al-Rahma, Kwaiti, and Edart Al Muhararat wells, but it meets the standards in Al-Hashash and Al-Qassam wells. The nitrate concentrations also are higher than the natural range in all wells except Edart Al Muhararat. The groundwater potential pollution could be caused due to the random use of chemical fertilizers; this potential pollution could be expanded in the future.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The main goal of this study was to evaluate the groundwater aquifer in part of the free settlements areas using contaminants indicators. Five samples of groundwater were tested chemically in term of total dissolved solids (TDS), electric conductivity (EC), and (N-P-K) concentrations to be compared with the regulated groundwater standards and to check the effect of fertilizers on the groundwater aquifer, whereas another water sample collected from the water irrigation reservoir was tested to check the quality of water used for irrigation.</p><p>The groundwater testing results in five observation wells showed that the groundwater tends to be basic, and has high salinity values, and registers high TDS results. Nitrate results also exceeded the standard and thus referred to the usage of fertilizers over the study area. Phosphorus and potassium results showed that all groundwater samples met the standards and didn’t exceed them.</p><p>To be concluded, six groundwater samples in the study area were tested, and by analyzing the chemical results, it is found that groundwater is polluted in term of nitrates and has a high salinity value which indicates that the random use of fertilizers in the study area is the main reason for this pollution.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>YunesMogheir,Salahaldin AbuAbdou,SamirMatar, (2016) The Influence of Fertilizers on Groundwater Quality in Gaza Strip—Free Settlements on Khan Younis—Case Study. Journal of Water Resource and Protection,08,330-336. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2016.83027</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.64888-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Villeneuve, J.P., Banton, O. and Lafrance, P. (1990) A Probabilistic Approach for the Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination by Pesticides: The VULPEST Model. Ecological Modelling, 51, 47-58.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(90)90057-N</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64888-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thapinta, A. and Hudak, P. (2003) Use of Geographic Information Systems for Assessing Groundwater Pollution Potential by Pesticides in Central Thailand. Environmental International, 29, 87-93.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00149-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64888-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chae, G., Kim, K., Yun, S., Kim, K., Kim, S., Choi, B., Kim, H. and Rhee, C.W. (2004) Hydrogeochemistry of Alluvial Groundwaters in an Agricultural Area: An Implication for Groundwater Contamination Susceptibility. Chemosphere, 55, 369-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64888-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Metcalf and Eddy Inc. (2000) Integrated Aquifer Management Plan, Final Report, Gaza Coastal Aquifer Management Program. USAID Contract No. 294-C-00-99-00038.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64888-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palestinian Water Authority (2006) Integrated Water Resources Management. Unpublished Report.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64888-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (WHO) (1996) Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. 2nd Edition, World Health Organization, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64888-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palestinian Ministry of Agriculture (2010) Evaluation of Agricultural Situation in Free Settlements. Official Report.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64888-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministry of Planning and International Planning (MOPIC) (1998) Regional Plan for Gaza Governorates 1998-2015. Palestinian National Authority.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64888-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al Abadla, H. (2014) Agricultural Engineer. Gaza Strip, Khan Younes Governorate.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64888-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palestinian Water Authority (PWA) (2007) Water Resources Status in Gaza Strip. PWA Publications, Palestine.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64888-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">PCBS (2000) Population, Housing and Establishment Census 1997. Palestinian National Authority, Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, Ramallah, Palestine.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>