<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2016.64028</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-64781</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Epidemiology of Sexual Behaviour with Risk of Sexually Transmissible Infection (STI) among Students in Africa: The Case of the University of Ouagadougou
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>.</surname><given-names>M. R. Ouedraogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>F.</surname><given-names>D. Millogo Traore</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Ouattara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Ouedraogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>X.</surname><given-names>Kaboré</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>D.</surname><given-names>P. Kain</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>B.</surname><given-names>Yaméogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>E.</surname><given-names>Komboigo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M.</surname><given-names>Guinko</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>J.</surname><given-names>Lankoandé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The University Teaching Hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>ocharlemagne@yahoo.fr(.MRO)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>03</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>219</fpage><lpage>231</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>15</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>16</month>	<year>March</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: To study the sexual risk behaviors and their determining role in sexually transmissible infection (STI) and HIV among students of the University of Ouagadougou. Methodology: It was a descriptive and analytical single pass cross-sectional study from June 22 to July 21 2010 at the University of Ouagadougou. A cluster sampling in two stages was adopted to form a population of 762. Data were collected using a standardized written questionnaire completed by individual interview after informed consent. Results: The average age of students was 24.2 &#177; 2 years old for men and 23.7 &#177; 2 years old women. Singles represented 95.1% of students. The students were not scholarship grantees in 90.6% of the sample. Knowledge about STIs was average in 60.2% of cases. In total 33.65% of the students admitted to having had multiple sexual partners, 19.57% had sex with prostitutes, 34.62% had unprotected sex, 4% practiced sodomy without condoms and 3.1% of students had sex in group with one partner. In multivariate analysis, male gender was the determining factor associated with multiple sexual partner (OR = 3.30 95% CI = 2.19 to 4.95) and relations with prostitutes with an odds ratio of 16.13 (95 = 6.87% to 37.8%). The female gender was the determining factor associated with not using a condom with odds ratio of 1.5 (95% CI = 1.01 to 2.16). Conclusion: There are many risk behaviors for HIV transmission among students of the University of Ouagadougou. The urgent implementation of specific prevention programs to benefit this population is essential.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Risks Sexual Behavior</kwd><kwd> Student</kwd><kwd> Ouagadougou</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>HIV infection is a disease that poses to humanity an unprecedented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref2">2</xref>] challenge. In Burkina Faso, the average prevalence of the pandemic in 2008 in the adult population was 1.6% and the number of HIV positive was estimated at 130,000, with a fatality rate of 19.7%. According to UNAIDS, sexual behavior plays a key role in the spread and persistence of the pandemic which mainly concerns young sexually active population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref3">3</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref6">6</xref>] . Promotion of safer sexual practices among youth and especially among students who are the future of the nation is more important than ever. In student environment, the situation of HIV infection is poorly understood due to insufficient given statistics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref7">7</xref>] . Also to provide relevant and local information for the implementation of health education programs, we conducted a survey on sexual risk behaviors among students at the University of Ouagadougou.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><p>It was a descriptive and analytical single pass cross-sectional study which lasted from June 22, 2010 to July 21, 2010. It involved seven (07) units of training and research (UTR) and the Burkinabe arts and crafts Institute (IBAM) of the University of Ouagadougou. All the students of the 1st and 2nd cycle enrolled for the academic year 2009-2010 constituted our study population. The 3rd cycle students who performed practical training outside the University were not included in our sample. We conducted a two stages cluster sampling. The first level was made from a list of all classes by simple random sampling. The second level was made by a systematic sampling where the number of students selected was proportional to the size of the class. The sample size of 762 students was calculated from the prevalence in the general population and an accuracy of 95%. We used a standardized written questionnaire completed by individual interview after informed consent. We recorded 9 nonrespondents, the response rate was of 98.82%. Ten investigators were trained on technical approach, maintenance as well as the interest of the investigation. The administration of the questionnaire was made outside of school hours. Data were entered using EPI Data software version 3.1 and analyzed in SPSS 17.0. We used a chi 2 test to compare variables with a significance level of 5%.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Demographics</title><p>・ Sex</p><p>Considering a total of 753 students, 454 were males and 299 were females. The sex ratio was 1.52 in favor of males.</p><p>・ Age</p><p>The average age of students was 23.8 &#177; 3 years old. Median was 24 years old. For males the average age was 24.2 &#177; 2 years old and 23.7 &#177; 2 years old for females. Extreme ages in our sample were 18 and 54 years old.</p><p>・ Marital status</p><p>Students were single in 95.1% of cases (n = 716), cohabiting in 2.2% of cases (n = 17) and 2.7% in couple (n = 20).</p><p>・ Housing mode</p><p>Students living in their parental family were 42.9% of cases (n = 323), 19% of cases lived with a guardian (n = 143). In 19.8% of cases (n = 149) with their friends, alone in 12.2% of cases (n = 91) and campus dormitory in 6.1% cases (n = 47).</p><p>・ Student status</p><p>The students were not scholarship grantees in 90.6% of cases (n = 682), scholarship grantees in 6.4% of cases (n = 48), civil servants in 1.7% (n = 13) and foreign scholarship grantees in 1.3% of cases (n = 10).</p><p>・ Level of knowledge of STIs</p><p>In our series, 27.8% of students had low knowledge about HIV/STI, 60.20% had average knowledge and 12% of students had deep knowledge.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Sexual Behavior</title><p>・ Sexual Experience</p><p>In total 618 students, or 82.10% had sex, 60.20% were males and 39.80% females. It was noted that 81.93% of men and 82.27% of women had ever had a sexual experience (p &gt; 0.05).</p><p>・ Age at first sex</p><p>The average age at first intercourse was 19 &#177; 2 years old. It was 19.14 &#177; 2 years old for females and 18 9 &#177; 2 years old for males. Extreme age at first intercourse was 11 years old and 32 years old.</p><p>・ Frequency of sex</p><p>The students had sex on average 2.61 times per week. Weekly frequency of sexual intercourse by gender is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>・ Details of last sexual intercourse</p><p>The last sex that students had was consenting in 88.1% and in 11.9% of cases was imposed by the partner. The condom was used in 45% of cases.</p><p>・ Number of sexual partners</p><p>The number of sexual partners by gender was presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>・ Having sex with sex workers</p><p>In our study, 121 students, or 19.57% (121/618) of sexually active students had sexual contact with prostitutes. In this group, 95% were male and 5% were women (p &lt; 0.001]. During the last twelve months prior to the survey, 54.78% of those who frequented prostitutes had only one sexual contact, and 45.22% had more than one sexual contact.</p><p>・ Sexual intercourse with a partner using drugs intravenously</p><p>According to the survey, 10 students, or 1.61% (10/618) had had sex with a partner using drugs intravenously.</p><p>・ Drunk sexual intercourse</p><p>In our study, 50 students or 8.1% (50/618) of sexually active students had already had sex while drunk. We noted 76% men and 24% women (p &lt; 0.01).</p><p>・ Fellation practice</p><p>At the time of the survey, forty-eight women, or 19.51% (48/246) of sexually active women practiced fellation. This practice was recurrent among women who maintained sex with multiple sexual partners (78%).</p><p>・ Cunnilingus practice</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of weekly frequency of intercourse by sex</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Weekly</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Men (n = 247)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Women (n = 209)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >one</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >two</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >for</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Five and more</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>P = 0.07.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of the number of sexual partners by gender</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of partners</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Males</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Females</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >192</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >372</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >372</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >246</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >618</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>At the time of the survey, 27 men, 7.25% (27/372) of sexually active men practiced cunnilingus. Also, it was found that 84% of men who practiced cunnilingus were in the age group of 15 - 24 years old. But no statistically significant difference had been found.</p><p>・ Practice of sodomy</p><p>Sodomy was practiced by 22 students, 6% (22/372) of sexually active men. In this population, 60% practiced without condoms and 40% with condom. Anal sex without a condom was mainly practiced by men (70%) who had multiple sexual partners.</p><p>・ Practice of homosexuality</p><p>In our study, 4 statements about homosexuality were noted, 1.07% (4/372) of sexually active men. Students who had homosexual behavior were all male and in 50% of cases they had not used condoms.</p><p>・ Concept of sexual assault</p><p>In our series, 04 students, or 1.62% of sexually active women reported having been sexually assaulted and 4 males students, representing 1.07% of sexually active men reported having committed a sexual assault.</p><p>・ Unprotected sex</p><p>In our study, 203 students, or 32.84% of sexually active students had not used a condom during their last sexual intercourse. Among them, 48.06% were male and 51.94% were women (p &lt; 0.01). Also, 31.94% of men who had multiple sexual partners have had unprotected sex during their last sexual intercourse.</p><p>・ Sexual intercourse by simultaneous multiple partners</p><p>In our series, 20 students, or 3.23% (20/618) of sexually active students had sexual relations with several partners at once. It was noted that 75% were men and 15% women.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Study of Determinants of Sexual Risk Behavior</title><p>・ Not using a condom</p><p>The determinants of no condom use after multivariate analysis by logistic regression were shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>・ Determinants of multiple sexual partnerships</p><p>Determinants of multi sexual partnership after multivariate analysis by logistic regression were shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>・ Determinants of sex with prostitutes</p><p>The study of factors associated with having sex with prostitutes is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Analysis of factors associated with not using a condom</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >OR [95%CI]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.041</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >229</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.48 [1.01 - 2.16]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Marital Status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.167</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >485</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 [0.14 - 1.14]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Cohabitation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62 [0.21 - 1.77]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Housing mode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.358</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Family</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Guardian</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15 [0.70 - 1.89]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ University dormitory</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59 [0.27 - 1.31]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Rent alone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50 [0.80 - 2.5]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Rental with friends</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18 [0.7 - 2.01]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Studies of factors associated with multiple sexual partnerships</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >OR [95% CI]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >343</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.29 [2.19 - 4.95]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Religion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.347</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Catholic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >274</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Muslim</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >246</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22 [0.83 - 1.79]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Protestant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68 [0.34-1.38]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Traditional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45 [0.44 - 4.7]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Housing mode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.213</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Family</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >262</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Guardian</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01 [0.61 - 1.69]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ University dormitory</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56 [0.74 - 3.26]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Rent alone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42 [0.78 - 2.5]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Studies of factors associated with the maintaining of sex with prostitutes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >OR [95% CI]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sexe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >16.13 [6.87 - 37.8]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Religion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.213</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Catholic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >293</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Muslim</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >257</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.42 [0.90 - 2.25]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Protestant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.83 [0.37 - 1.84]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Traditional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.49 [0.10 - 2.39]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Housing mode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Family</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >281</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Guardian</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.06 [0.57 - 1.98]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >University dormitory universitaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.8 [0.32 - 2.04]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Rent alone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.62 [0.83 - 3.18]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Rent with friends</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.20 [0.73 - 2.26]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The data collected were they sincere? The problem arises in all investigations, manipulating politics, sports practices or sexuality. Despite these limitations, the results we have achieved have allowed to make comments and lead a discussion.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Risk Sexual Behaviors</title><p>・ Multiple sexual partners</p><p>In our series, among sexually active students, 33.65% reported having multiple sexual partners. This frequency is lower than those of other African authors. Sepou Bangui [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref8">8</xref>] Yao in Abidjan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref9">9</xref>] and Ditri in Togo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref10">10</xref>] reported 41%, 63% and 58% respectively. Multiple partners is a major risk factor for the transmission of STIs and should be prohibited in youth. Awareness campaigns should help correct this behavior by assuming that prostitution is an significant risk factor for HIV infection spread [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>・ Sexual intercourse with sex workers</p><p>In our series, 19.57% of students had sex with prostitutes in the past twelve months. Ditri in Togo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref10">10</xref>] and Tiembr&#233; in C&#244;te d’Ivoire [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref4">4</xref>] reported respectively 30.9% and 31.8% of students having sex with sex workers respectively. Since the adoption of the structural adjustment program by African leaders living conditions of African student became difficult. But this should not justify this behavior that exposes youth tremendously.</p><p>・ No use of condoms</p><p>In our study, 34.95% of students had not used a condom during their last sexual intercourse. Yao in Abidjan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref9">9</xref>] and Ditri in Togo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref10">10</xref>] reported 31% and 26% of non-use of condom during last sexual intercourse respectively. Some bad beliefs among students according to which direct contact is essential during intercourse could be a barrier to condom use. One cannot imagine that condoms price subsidizing will constitute a barrier to its use.</p><p>・ Homosexuality</p><p>Four students, representing 1.07% of sexually active men had sex with men. Ditri had reported a rate of 1.3% in Togo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref10">10</xref>] Harding Nigeria 2% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref13">13</xref>] Yao C&#244;te d'Ivoire 2.95% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref9">9</xref>] . Our figures and those of the other series suggest that homosexuality is a reality in our societies and deserves to be taken into account in all programs of STI prevention [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>・ Oral sex</p><p>Oral sex was practiced by 19.27% of sexually active students. Similar results are reported by other African studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref10">10</xref>] . This practice is a potential source of contamination to STI and HIV and should be proscribed sexual practices of our students. It could also be practiced using the appropriate protective measures.</p><p>・ Drunk sex</p><p>In our series, 8.1% of students had sex while drunk. According to Tiembre in C&#244;te d'Ivoire, 20.4% of students reported having had sexual intercourse in the same conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref4">4</xref>] . Sex while drunk is a risk factor for infection with STIs and HIV. Alcohol abuse leads to a loss of control mechanisms of his own personality and allows involuntarily risk behaviors for STI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref15">15</xref>] . Burkina Faso is a crossroads where cheap adulterated liquor is easily accessible by students. Students who are mostly without scholarships should stay away from drinking that might in danger their future and impoverish them more.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Determinants of Risk Behavior</title><p>・ No use of condoms</p><p>Non-use of condom during sex is a risky behavior that persists among students. In multivariate analysis, only the female appeared to be the demographic factor significantly associated with not using a condom for sexual intercourse among students [OR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.16]. In fact, the females are 1.5 times more likely than men of not using condom during sex. Our results are comparable to those reported by Mondieli in Niger [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref16">16</xref>] . In fact, in his study on the determinants of risky sexual behavior of STI/HIV/AIDS among adolescents in Niger, female gender was significantly associated with not using a condom at their last sexual intercourse. These results show the vulnerability of the girl who should know how to negotiate condom use from her partner.</p><p>・ Multi sexual partnership</p><p>In multivariate analysis, only male gender was associated with this practice and the men were 3.3 times more likely to have multiple sexual partners than women. Talman in C&#244;te d’Ivoire [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref17">17</xref>] showed in his study of social inequality and risky sexual behaviors among young people in Ivorian urban area, male sex was a determinant of risk sexual behaviors associated with the acquisition of multiple partners among Ivorian youth from 15 to 24 years in urban areas. The fact that African societies are more permissive sexuality of males over females could explain these findings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>・ Sex with prostitutes</p><p>In multivariate analysis, only gender was statistically associated with having sex with prostitutes and males were 16.3 times more likely to have sex with prostitutes than females. According to some African beliefs, the man would value its sexual experiences and attendance of sex professionals, there could find it as a way of self- exploration of unsuspected pleasures areas, to raise strong emotions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64781-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>There are many risk behaviors for HIV transmission among students of the University of Ouagadougou. The fight for the development of our society must go with the urgent implementation of specific prevention programs in this population. Further studies will explain more this subject which is a national interest.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>C. M. R.Ouedraogo,F. D. MillogoTraore,A.Ouattara,A.Ouedraogo,X.Kabor&#233;,D. P.Kain,B.Yam&#233;ogo,E.Komboigo,M.Guinko,J.Lankoand&#233;, (2016) Epidemiology of Sexual Behaviour with Risk of Sexually Transmissible Infection (STI) among Students in Africa: The Case of the University of Ouagadougou. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,06,219-231. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2016.64028</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Questionnaire</title><p>-Num&#233;ro du questionnaire / / / / /</p><p>-Nom et pr&#233;nom de l’enqu&#234;teur: ……………………………………………</p><p>-Date et heure de l’interview: ……………………………………………</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.64781-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Council for the Fight against AIDS and STIs (2009) General Assessment of the Implementation of Multisectoral National Plan against HIV/AIDS and STIs. CNLS Report, 89 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Family Health Project and AIDS Prevention (2001) AIDS, Let’s Talk. Message Development Guide on STI/HIV/ AIDS.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">The Family Health Directorate (2004) Strategic Plan 2004-2008 Youth Health.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tiembré, I., et al. (2007) Sexually Transmitted Infections and Condom Use in Student Circles. Med. Afr Noire, 54, 193-198.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNAIDS/WHO (2010) Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. UNAIDS, 364 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yacouba, Y. VIH/AIDS and Education in Burkina Faso: What Do We Know? Plural-Horizon Look.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soulimane, A. and Attaoui, N. (1998) AIDS Knowledge Level in a Student Population. Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health, 548-556.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sepou, A., Nguembi, E., Yanza, M.C., Ngbale, R. and Nali, M.N. (2004) Sexual Behavior of Students at the University of Bangui (Central African Republic). Médecine tropicale, 64, 163-167.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, K. (2001) Knowledge Assessment, Sexual Attitudes and Practices of Students to STI/HIV/AIDS. Medical Thesis, Abidjan, No. 2998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ditri, S., Bekele, M.G., et al. (1999) Sexual Behaviors, Knowledge and Attitudes of Students at the University of Togo Face to AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Health Papers, 9, 101-109.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ladner, J. and Ouangré, A. (2002) Types and Practices of Prostitution in Burkina Faso, the Need to Adapt Prevention Interventions for HIV and STDs. Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health, 50, 134 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Normand, P. and Market, G. (1997) Sexually Transmitted Diseases in the Tropics. Edition Pradel, Paris, 2-128.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harding, A.K., Anadu, E.C., Gray, L.A. and Champeau, D.A. (2000) Nigerian University Students’ Knowledge, Perceptions and Behaviours about HIV/AIDS: Are These Students at Risk? Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 119, 23-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marquet</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1997</year>)<article-title>Adolescents, First Sex and STDs: Lessons from the Belgian Survey on Sexual Behavior and Reactions to the Risk of AIDS</article-title><source> Health Book</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 165</fpage>-<lpage>168</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tchuani, C. and Ndonko, F. (2008) Determinants of Sexual Behavior among Young People in Urban Areas of Cameroon. Sidanet, 1, 712-716.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mondielli Amadou, D. (2006) Determinants of Sexual Behavior at Risk of Infection with STIs/HIV/AIDS among Adolescents in Niger. Master’s Thesis in Demography, University of Yaounde II, Soa, 129 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Talnan, E., Anoh, A. and Zanou, B. Social Inequality and Sexual Risk Behaviors among Young Adolescents in Urban Ivorian. Study of the African Population, 9, 54-72.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bardem, I. (1994) Study of the Practices and Representations of Young Adults in Precarious Situations. Doctoral Thesis in Sociology, University of Paris I, Paris, 415 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64781-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bozon, M. and Léridon, H. (1999) Sexuality and Social Sciences: Contributions of an Investigation. 1549 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>