<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJCM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Computational Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-1203</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajcm.2016.61002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJCM-64205</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Self Similarity Analysis of Web Users Arrival Pattern at Selected Web Centers
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ushpalatha</surname><given-names>Sarla</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mallikarjuna</surname><given-names>Reddy Doodipala</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Manohar</surname><given-names>Dingari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Engineering Mathematics, GITAM University Hyderabad Campus, Hyderabad, India</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>02</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>17</fpage><lpage>22</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>5</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>1</month>	<year>March</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The paper focuses on measuring self-similarity using few techniques by an index called Hurst index which is a self-similarity parameter. It has been evident that Internet traffic exhibits self-similarity. Motivated by this fact, real time web users at various centers considered here as traffic and it has been examined by various methods to test the self-similarity. The results from the experiments carried out verify that the traffic examined in the present study is self similar using a new method based on some descriptive measures; for example percentiles have been applied to compute Hurst parameter which gives intensity of the self-similarity. Numerical results and analysis we discussed and presented here play a significant role to improve the services at web centers in the view of quality of service (QOS).
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Long-Range Dependence</kwd><kwd> Self-Similarity</kwd><kwd> Poisson Process</kwd><kwd> Percentiles</kwd><kwd> Hurst Parameter</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>At present one of the major issues to know various traffic flows is in self similar nature to study and design some performance metric as that of Ethernet traffic etc. Until recently Poison approach has been used to model the road traffic irrespective of traffic intensity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64205-ref1">1</xref>] . This was similar to the practice in the cases of Ethernet, LAN, WAN, and WWW traffic. But seminal studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64205-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64205-ref3">3</xref>] reveal that IP packet traffic in supposed networks tends to be bursty in nature on many time scales. This burstiness of traffic can be characterized mathematically as self- similar or long-range dependence (LRD). It is clear from the work agreed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64205-ref4">4</xref>] that Poisson process could not emulate the self-similar network traffic. Markovian arrival process (MAP) emulating self-similar traffic is fitted over desired time scales by equating second-order statistics of the counts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64205-ref5">5</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64205-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>The idea of this paper is, we examine whether web users traffic data has the self similar property. This is to enhancement earlier results using a real time data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64205-ref10">10</xref>] . This kind of research is useful for future studies to know the performance metrics and continuous improvement of web centers at various private and in public sector organizations. The rest of the paper has been organized as follows: Definition of self-similarity or long range dependence is given in Section II. Materials and methods are placed in Section III. In Section IV, Hurst parameter is computed using various methods. Finally, conclusions are given in Section V.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Long-Range Dependence and Self-Similarity</title><p>In this section we give a short description of the mathematical basis for second order self-similar processes (long-range dependence).</p>Exact Second-Order Self-Similar Process<p>The exact second-order self-similar process is defined as follows. Arrival instants are modeled as point process. Divide the time axis into disjoint intervals of unit length and let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the number of points (arrival) in the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> interval. Let X be a second order stationary process with variance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the autocorrelation function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64205-formula566"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For each <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> let a new time series <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is obtained averaging the original time series X over non-overlapping blocks of size m. That is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64205-formula567"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This new series<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, for each m, is also a second order stationary process with autocorrelation function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Definition 1: The process “X” is said to be exactly second order self-similar with Hurst parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>and variance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64205-formula568"><label>(2.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Definition 2: The process “X” is said to be asymptotically second order self-similar with Hurst parameter</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and variance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64205-formula569"><label>(2.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In terms of variance, self-similar process is defined as follows:</p><p>Definition 3: The process “X” is said to be exactly second order self-similar with Hurst parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>and variance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64205-formula570"><label>(2.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now we shall differentiate long range dependence (LRD) and short range dependence (SRD) processes. For <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> from the Equation (2.3), we can see that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64205-formula571"><label>(2.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The series <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is divergent if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> otherwise they are convergent, being a posi-</p><p>tive term series. Accordingly the left hand series <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is divergent if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, otherwise</p><p>they are convergent. That is, for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the autocorrelation functions decays slowly, that is hyperbolically. In this case, the process x is called Long Range Dependent (LRD). The process x is Short Range Dependent (SRD) if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the autocorrelation function is summable (finite).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Materials and Methods</title><p>As discussed in the introduction, we are primarily interested collecting data from various sources. Real time web users data has been considered. The sample number of users logged on to an Internet server each minute over 100-minutes (see Appendix). In the study web users data can be treated as traffic and verify it is self-similar or not.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Methods for Estimating Hurst Parameter of Self-Similar Process</title><p>The intensity of self-similarity is given by Hurst parameter, H. The parameter H was named after the hydrologist H.E. Hurst who spent many years to investigate the problem of water storage and also to determine the level patterns of the Nile river. The parameter H has range<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Estimation of H is a difficult task. Several methods are available to estimate degree of self-similarity in a time-series. We also present the three basic methods to calculate the Hurst parameter: Periodogram analysis, Correlogram method, R/S analysis, Variance-time analysis etc. Here is a method based on percentiles is applied and validated with the said methods.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Periodogram Analysis</title><p>In the frequency domain, analysis of time series is merely the analysis of a stationary process by means of its spectral representation. The periodogram [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64205-ref11">11</xref>] is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64205-formula572"><label>(2.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the Fourier frequency, n is the number of terms in the time series and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the data of the given series. To estimate h, first, one has to calculate this periodogram. Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an good sample estimator of the spectral density, a series with long-range dependence should have a periodogram, which is proportional to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> close to the origin. Then a regression of the logarithm of the periodogram on the logarithm of the frequency λ should give a coefficient of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The slope of the fitted straight line is the estimate of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Using this method the H value is computed for the data given in section III. The obtained value of H in this case is 0.763.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Correlogram Method</title><p>In time series analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64205-ref12">12</xref>] , plot of ACF (autocorrelation function) is known as correlogram where the estimated correlation can be given in terms of auto-covariance function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.64205-formula573"><label>(2.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It has already been observed that slow decay of correlation, which is proportional to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>indicates the long-memory process. Therefore, the plot of the sample autocorrelation should exhibit this property. A much better plot for the handling of long-range dependence is the plot of ACF in logarithmic scale. If the asymptotic decay of the correlation is hyperbolic, then the points in the plot should be approximately scattered around a straight line with a negative slope of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for the long memory processes but for short memory, the points should tend to diverse to minus infinity at an exponential rate. If the time series is long enough or if the series has strong long-range dependence, then this log-log correlogram is useful. Correlogram is useful as a preliminary heuristic approach to the data. Some pitfalls of sample correlation which are less known can be found in Mandelbrot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64205-ref13">13</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64205-ref15">15</xref>] . Even though it is neither widely used nor attractive method for estimation, still H, the self-similarity parameter, can be estimated by this method deriving an equation of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64205-formula574"><label>(2.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using this method, the obtained value of H in this case is 0.79.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Percentile Method</title><p>In statistical methodologies, a percentile (or centile) is the value of a variable below which a certain percent of observations fall, like partition values of a process such as quartiles and deciles. There is no exact definition of percentile [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64205-ref16">16</xref>] , however all definitions yield similar results when the number of observations is very large. One definition of percentile, often given in texts, is that the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> percentile <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of N ordered values is obtained by first calculating the rank.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64205-formula575"><label>(2.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Given data set or time series<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. First we can find the percentiles <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for a given time series using</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64205-formula576"><label>(2.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>percentile, this a special type of average such as partition values in descriptive statistics like quartiles<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Draw a scattered Plot percentile number against percentiles on log scales. A linear equation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (say) is obtained with the slope<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The Hurst parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is then computed by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.64205-formula577"><label>. (2.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using this method, the H value is computed for the data. The pertaining scattered data and trend line with the slope <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The obtained value of H in this case is 0.762. One relevant paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.64205-ref17">17</xref>] , which explained how the 95-percentile depends on the aggregation window size, and how this phenomenon justifies the mathematical definition of self similarity. The advantages of this method are: This method is matter of a simple empirical formula, unlike other two methods. Data however large it may be is divided into 100 parts (partition values) and the plotting involves only 100 points (percentile versus percentile number).</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Percentile versus percentile number</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x65.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Math Lab Implementation Code is Linked with the Percentile Method</title><disp-formula id="scirp.64205-formula578"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1100494x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Some Conclusions</title><p>In this paper, real time web user’s data has been considered as traffic from various web centers and it has been proved to be self-similar. Various methods to test the self-similarity have been used. The obtained values of Hurst parameter h are reasonably close to each other. This kind of research is useful for future studies to know the performance metrics at web centers.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>PushpalathaSarla,Mallikarjuna ReddyDoodipala,ManoharDingari, (2016) Self Similarity Analysis of Web Users Arrival Pattern at Selected Web Centers. American Journal of Computational Mathematics,06,17-22. doi: 10.4236/ajcm.2016.61002</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Appendix</title><p>The number of users logged on to an Internet server each minute over 100-minutes.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.64205-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perati, M.R., Raghavendra, K., Koppula, H.K.R., Doodipala, M.R. and Dasari, R. (2012) Self-Similar Behavior of Highway Road Traffic and Performance Analysis at Toll Plazas. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138, 1233-1238.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leland, W.E., Taqqu, M.S., Willinger, W. and Wilson, D.V. (1994) On the Self-Similar Nature of Ethernet Traffic (Extended Version). IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2, 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/90.282603</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crovella, M. and Bestavros, A. (1997) Self-Similarity in World Wide Web Traffic: Evidence and Possible Causes. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 5, 835-846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/90.650143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paxson, V. and Floyd, S. (1995) Wide Area Traffic: The Failure of Poisson Modeling. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 3, 226-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/90.392383</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anderson, A.T. and Nielsen, B.F. (1998) A Markovian Approach for Modeling Packet Traffic with Long Range Dependence. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16, 719-732. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/49.700908</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yoshihara, T., Kasahara, S. and Takahashi, Y. (2001) Practical Time-Scale Fitting of Self-Similar Traffic with Markov-Modulated Poisson Process. Telecommunication Systems, 17, 185-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1016616406118</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shao, S.K., Perati, M.R., Tsai, M.G., Tsao, H.W. and Wu, J. (2005) Generalized Variance-Based Markovian Fitting for Self-Similar Traffic Modeling. IEICE Transactions on Communications, E88-B, 4659-4663.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doodipala, M.R. (2013) Second Order Statistics of Time Series of Various Real Time Problems in Conjunction with Periodogram Technique. International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology (IJLTET), 3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nagatani, T. (2005) Self-Similar Behavior of a Single Vehicle through Periodic Traffic Lights. Physica A, 347, 673-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.08.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Markidakis, S., Wheelwright, S.C. and Hydman, R.J. (1998) Forcating Methods and Applications. 3rd Edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons. Inc., Hoboken.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meng, Q. and Khoo, H.L. (2009) Self-Similar Characteristics of Vehicle Arrival Pattern on Highways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 135, 864-872.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brockwell, P.J. and Davis, R.A. (1996) An Introduction to Time Series and Fore-Casting. Springer-Verlag, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2526-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sarker, M.M.A. (2007) Estimation of the Self-Similarity Parameter in Long Memory Processes. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, ME38, 32-37. Transaction of the Mech. Eng. Div., The Institution of Engineers, Bangladesh.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beran, J., Taqqu, M.S. and Willinger, W. (2002) Long-Range Dependence in Variable Bit Rate Traffic. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 43, 1566-1579.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beran, J. (1994) Statistics for Long-Memory Processes. Chapman and Hall.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lane, D. Percentiles. http://cnx.org/content/m10805/latest</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.64205-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Web Hosting Talk Forum: 95th Percentile Billing Polling Interval. http://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=579003(2008)</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>