<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">APM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Pure Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-0368</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/apm.2016.63013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">APM-63987</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Modified Double Zeta Function and Its Properties
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>rif</surname><given-names>M. Khan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Jodhpur Institute of Engineering &amp;amp; Technology, Jodhpur, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>khanarif76@gmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>02</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>159</fpage><lpage>167</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>24</month>	<year>February</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The present paper aims at introducing and investigating a new class of generalized double zeta function 
  i.e. modified double zeta function which involves the Riemann, Hurwitz, Hurwitz-Lerch, Barnes double zeta function and Bin-Saad generalized double zeta function as particular cases. The results are obtained by suitably applying Riemann-Liouville type and Tremblay fractional integral and differential operators. We derive the expansion formula for the proposed function with some of its properties via fractional operators and discuss the link with known results.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Modified Zeta Function</kwd><kwd> Riemann-Liouville Operator</kwd><kwd> Tremblay Fractional Operators</kwd><kwd> Hypergeometric Function</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction and Preliminaries</title><p>The Hurwitz-Lerch zeta function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref1">1</xref>] is defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1111"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is an analytic function in both variables y and z in suitable region.</p><p>The further generalization of Hurwitz-Lerch zeta function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref2">2</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1112"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denotes the Pochhammer’s symbol, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref4">4</xref>] Bin-Saad and Al-Gonah introduced two hypergeometric type generating functions of generalized zeta function as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1113"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1114"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The generalized double zeta function of Bin-Saad [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref5">5</xref>] is defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1115"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>The alternate representation is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1116"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the generalized zeta function defined by (2).</p><p>The generalized hypergeometric function in classical form has been defined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref6">6</xref>] as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1117"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; denominator parameters are neither zero nor negative integers.</p><p>Bin-Saad [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref5">5</xref>] discussed following relationships.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1118"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1119"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1120"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1121"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where F<sub>1</sub> is the Appell’s function of two variables [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref7">7</xref>] defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1122"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We further recall the following well known expansion formula of Hurwitz-Lerch zeta function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref1">1</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1123"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1124"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is Hurwitz zeta function which is generalization of the Riemann zeta function given as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1125"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Due to great potential and significant role of special functions especially hypergeometric functions in various problems occurring in mathematical physics, engineering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref9">9</xref>] , the author has motivated to further investigate the topic. Several generalizations of hypergeometric functions have been made by many authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref11">11</xref>] . Recently Rao [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref12">12</xref>] defined Wright type generalized hypergeometric function via fractional calculus. Many authors investigated the fractional calculus approach in study of generalized hypergeometric type function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref14">14</xref>] . The subject fractional calculus has gained much attention amongst researchers due to its vast potential of demonstrated mathematical models in various fields of science and engineering such as diffusion, oscillation, dynamical process in porous structures, propagation of waves, diffusive transport, fluid flow, etc. The present paper aims at introducing and investigating a new kind of hypergeometric type function that is modified double zeta function via fractional calculus. The layout of the paper is as follows</p><p>In section 2 we introduce and discuss some properties of the modified double zeta function. Section 3 devoted to discuss the Trembley [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref15">15</xref>] well poised fractional calculus operator together with its properties. In section 4, we establish some interesting results of modified double zeta function through fractional operators and also derive its summation formula. In section 5, we develop some properties of fractional operators. Many Lemmas and particular cases have been discussed to relate known results.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Modified Double Zeta Function</title><p>In a sequel of result (5) here we introduce a modified double zeta function as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1126"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>We can readily obtain following relationship</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1127"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x38.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1128"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1129"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1130"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x41.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Integration and differentiation of fractional order are traditionally defined by the left side Riemann fractional integral operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and right hand operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the corresponding R-L fractional derivative operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref8">8</xref>] , which are given as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1131"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1132"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Further for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the left sided and right sided Riemann fractional differential operators are defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1133"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1134"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x50.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>A generalization of Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref9">9</xref>] is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1135"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(throughout this paper we apply all operators with respect to x variable).</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the space of Lebesgue measurable real or complex valued functions such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1136"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 2.1. (Mathai and Haubold [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref16">16</xref>] ) If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1137"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 2.2. (Srivastava and Tomovski [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref14">14</xref>] ) If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1138"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 2.3. If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, w &gt; 0 then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1139"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. On using definition (16), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1140"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Simplify and using definition (16) again, yields the proof of (29).</p><p>Now we define the integral operator as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1141"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x69.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p><img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x71.png" />,<img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x72.png" /> (31)</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Well Poised Fractional Calculus Operator</title><p>The fractional calculus operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> that was introduced by Tremblay [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref15">15</xref>] is given as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1142"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x74.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and due to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref17">17</xref>] we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1143"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x76.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We can easily obtain the following result of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1144"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1145"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1146"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1147"><label>(37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is Gauss hypergeometric function.</p><p>The operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has lot more interesting properties and applications. Tremblay introduced this operator to deal with special function more efficiently.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. The Main Results</title><p>Theorem 4.1 If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>then for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> following results holds true</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1148"><label>(38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1149"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x90.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1150"><label>(40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. L.H.S of (38) after using (21) gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1151"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x93.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using definition (16) suitably changing the order of summation and integration, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1152"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By virtue of (27)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1153"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x95.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Finally by using definition (16), yields result (38).</p><p>Further to prove (39), we use (16) and (23)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1154"><label>(43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x96.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using (38) we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1155"><label>(44)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Finally using lemma 2.3 yields R.H.S of (39).</p><p>To prove (40), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1156"><label>(45)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x98.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equation (28), yields proof of (40).</p><p>Theorem 4.2 If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1157"><label>(46)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x103.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. We have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1158"><label>(47)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>On using (35) we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1159"><label>(48)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x105.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>After little simplification and using definition (16), yields the results (46).</p><p>Remark 4.1. For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, z = 1 Equation (46) yields.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1160"><label>(49)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Remark 4.2. On putting y = 0 in Equation (49), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1161"><label>(50)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x108.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Remark 4.3. Further if we set b = c in Equation (46), it reduces to known identity due to Trembley [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref15">15</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1162"><label>(51)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x109.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Theorem 4.3. If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1163"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x113.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1164"><label>(52)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x114.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. Expressing modified zeta function in L.H.S as series and changing the order of integration and summation, gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1165"><label>(53)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x115.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>employing (37), yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1166"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x116.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which completes the proof.</p><p>Corollary 4.1. On putting <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Equation (52) reduces to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1167"><label>(54)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Theorem 4.4. If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and all conditions mentioned in theorem 4.1 holds, then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1168"><label>(55)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x121.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. From (16) we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1169"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x124.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now employing series representation of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at R.H.S in above equation by using (13)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1170"><label>(56)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x126.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1171"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x127.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Clearly <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>After little simplification</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1172"><label>(57)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x129.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This completes the proof of (55).</p><p>Remark 4.4. For b = c equation (55) yields the result [Bin-Saad [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref5">5</xref>] : p. 273, Equation (2.18), theorem 2.1].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Some Properties of the Operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title><p>Theorem 5.1. With all conditions on parameters as stated in Equations (27) and (30), the following properties holds true</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1173"><label>(58)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x131.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. From (21) and (30), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1174"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x132.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1175"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x133.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Interchanging the order of integration and using Dirichlet formula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref17">17</xref>] , we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1176"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x134.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and substituting<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1177"><label>(59)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x136.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Making use of (21) leads</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1178"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x137.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>this leads the proof of L.H.S of (58).</p><p>again</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1179"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x138.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the Dirichlet formula [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref17">17</xref>] and interchanging the order of integration we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1180"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x139.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63987-formula1181"><label>(60)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x141.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>making use of (59) readily leads to the proof of R.H.S of (58).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>Recently fractional operator’s theory was recognized to be a good tool for modeling complex problems, kinetic equations, fractional reaction, diffusion equations, etc. In this work we introduce and study the new class of generalized zeta function through Riemann Liouville type and Tremblay fractional integral and differential operators. In section 4, interesting images of modified double zeta function have been obtained and useful link between generalized and modified zeta function has been established through Trembley fractional operator. Series expansion of the new class of generalized zeta function is a significant contribution in the direction along that developed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63987-ref5">5</xref>] . In section 5, interesting properties of operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-5301009x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> have been derived. Many lemmas, corollaries and remarks are obtained to link results with earlier known work. Composition results of Trembley fractional operators and modified zeta function are very useful due to general nature proposed function which may lead several functions and open vast scope of further research in the operator’s field.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Arif M.Khan, (2016) Modified Double Zeta Function and Its Properties. Advances in Pure Mathematics,06,159-167. doi: 10.4236/apm.2016.63013</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.63987-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Erdelyi, A., Magnus, W., Oberhettinger, F. and Tricomi, F.G. (1953) Higher Transcendental Functions, Vol. I. Mc-Graw-Hill, New York, Toronto and London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goyal, S. and Laddha, R.K. (1997) On the Generalized Riemann Zeta Function and the Generalized Lambert Transform. Ganita Sandesh, 11, 99-108.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bin-Saad, M.G. and Al Gonah, A.A. (2006) On Hypergeometric Type Generating Functions Associated with Generalized Zeta Function. Acta Mathematica Universitatis Comenianae, 75, 253-266.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bin-Saad</surname><given-names> M.G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Sums and Partial Sums of Double Power Series Associated with the Generalized Zeta Function and Their N Fractional Calculus</article-title><source> Mathematical Journal of Okayama University</source><volume> 49</volume>,<fpage> 37</fpage>-<lpage>52</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bin-Saad</surname><given-names> M.G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Hypergeometric Series Associated with the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta Function</article-title><source> Acta Mathematica Universitatis Comenianae</source><volume> 78</volume>,<fpage> 269</fpage>-<lpage>286</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Renvillle, E.D. (1960) Special Functions. Macmillan Company, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Srivastava, H.M. and Karlsson, P.K. (1985) Multiple Gaussian Hypergeometric Series. Halsted Press Bristone, London and New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kilbas, A.A.A., Srivastava, H.M. and Trujillo, J.J. (2006) Theory and Application of Fractional Differential Equations. North Holland Mathematical Studied, Vol. 204, Elsevier, Amsterdam.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Hilfer, R., Ed. (2000) Application of Fractional Calculus in Physics. World (Sc.), Singapore.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prajapati, J.C., Saxena, R.K., Jana, R.K. and Shukla, A.K. (2013) Some Results on Mittag Leffler Function Operator. Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2013, 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-33</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rao, S.B., Salehbhai, I.A. and Shukla, A.K. (2013) On Sequence of Functions Containing Generalized Hypergeometric Function. Mathematical Sciences Research Journal, 17, 98-110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rao, S.B., Prajapati, J.C., Patel, A.D. and Shukla A.K. (2014) Some Properties of Wright Type Hypergeometric Functionvia Fractional Calculus. Advances in Difference Equation, 2014, 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2014-119</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shukla, A.K. and Prajapati, J.C. (2008) On Mittag Leffler Type Function and Generalized Integral Operator. Mathematical Sciences Research Journal, 12, 283-290.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Srivastva, H.M. and Tomovski, Z. (2009) Fractional Calculus with an integral Operator Containing a Generalized Mittag Leffler in the Kernel. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 211, 198-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2009.01.055</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tremblay, R. (1974) Une contribution a la theorie de la deriveefractionnaire. Laval University, Québec City.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mathai, A.M. and Haubold, H.J. (2010) Special Function for Applied Scientist. Springer, Berlin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63987-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miller, K.S. and Ross, B. (1993) An Introduction of the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations. John Wiley and Sons, New York.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>