<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJAC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Analytical Chemistry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8251</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajac.2016.72018</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJAC-63759</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Co&lt;sub&gt;9&lt;/sub&gt;S&lt;sub&gt;8&lt;/sub&gt; Nanotubes as an Efficient Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Electrolyte
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ihuang</surname><given-names>Jin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cuncai</surname><given-names>Lv</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jie</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Xia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yaoxing</surname><given-names>Zhao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhipeng</surname><given-names>Huang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Scientific Research Academy, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>zphuang@ujs.edu.cn(ZH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>01</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>210</fpage><lpage>218</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>22</month>	<year>February</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Cobalt sulfide (Co
  <sub>9</sub>S
  <sub>8</sub>) nanotubes were found to be an electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction under alkaline condition. An electrode comprising of Co
  <sub>9</sub>S
  <sub>8</sub> nanotubes on a glass carbon electrode (GCE) (mass loading: 0.855 mg&#183;cm
  <sup>-2</sup>) produced a cathodic current density of 20 mA&#183;cm
  <sup>-2</sup> at an overpotential of 320 mV. The Co
  <sub>9</sub>S
  <sub>8</sub>/GCE electrode was stable over 20,000 s during potentiostatic electrolysis. Minor degradation of reduction current after 4000 cyclic voltammetric sweeps suggests the long-term viability under operating conditions. The faradaic efficiency of Co
  <sub>9</sub>S
  <sub>8</sub> nanotubes is nearly 100% during the electrolysis of water.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Cobalt Sulfide Nanotubes</kwd><kwd> Electrocatalyst</kwd><kwd> Hydrogen Evolution Reaction</kwd><kwd> Alkaline Electrolyte</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Hydrogen has been considered as a clean and efficient fuel in the transition from the current hydrocarbon economy because of the climate change and the shortage of fossil fuels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref1">1</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref3">3</xref>] . Though the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) can be effectively facilitated by Pt-group metals, the high cost and scarcity of Pt-group metals make the widespread application of these catalysts difficult. The exploitation of efficient HER catalysts among low cost and abundant compound is therefore desirable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref4">4</xref>] . Successful examples include MoS<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref4">4</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref7">7</xref>] , WS<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref9">9</xref>] , WS<sub>3</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref9">9</xref>] , CoS<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref10">10</xref>] , MoSe<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref12">12</xref>] , WSe<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref12">12</xref>] , CoSe<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref13">13</xref>] , MoB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref14">14</xref>] , Mo<sub>2</sub>C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref15">15</xref>] , NiMoN<sub>x</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref16">16</xref>] , Co<sub>0.6</sub>Mo<sub>1.4</sub>N<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref17">17</xref>] , MoP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref18">18</xref>] , Ni<sub>2</sub>P [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref19">19</xref>] , Ni<sub>12</sub>P<sub>5</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref20">20</xref>] , Co<sub>2</sub>P [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref21">21</xref>] , and CoP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>Because most electrode materials suffer from corrosion in acidic condition, alkaline water electrolysis is widely adopted in industry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref3">3</xref>] . Nowadays, the Co-based materials have attracted considerable attention due to their high activity toward HER and low cost, especially in the aspect of alkaline water electrolysis. In this study, we show that Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes can work as an earth-abundant electrocatalyst with efficient catalytic activity and excellent stability during HER in basic solution.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Materials Synthesis</title><p>The method used in the synthesis of Co(CO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>0.35</sub>Cl<sub>0.20</sub>(OH)<sub>1.10</sub> nanorods was adopted from those reported in ref [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref24">24</xref>] . Then, 0.6 mmol of the as-prepared Co(CO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>0.35</sub>Cl<sub>0.20</sub>(OH)<sub>1.10</sub> and 0.629 mL of a supersaturated Na<sub>2</sub>S aqueous solution were loaded into a Teflon liner (40 mL) with 30 ml distilled water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref24">24</xref>] . The liner was sealed in a stainless steel autoclave and maintained at 160˚C for 8 h, then cooled naturally to room temperature. The black precipitates were filtered off, washed with distilled water and ethanol, and then dried at 60˚C.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Material Characterization</title><p>The morphologies were accessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, 7001F, JEOL) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, 2100, JEOL). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) experiments were carried out on a Physical Electronics PHI 5700 ESCA System. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected with a D8 ADVANCE.</p><p>The electrochemical measurements were carried out in an 1M KOH aqueous solution with an electrochemical workstation (CHI614D, CH Instrument). A three-electrode configuration was adopted in the measurements, with Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> loading on GCE as the working electrode, a graphite rodas the counter electrode and a Mercury/Mercury Oxide electrode (MOE, Hg/HgO) as the reference electrode. The reversible hydrogen evolution potential (RHE) was determined to be −0.879 V vs MOE by the open circuit potential of a clean Pt electrode in the same solution. For the evaluation of HER catalytic activity, Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes (4 mg) were dispersed in 1 mL of water/ethanol (4/1, V/V) containing 80 μL of Nafion solution (5 wt%). The evaluation of the HER catalytic activity of Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> loaded on GCE was carried out by linear sweep voltammetry (5 mV∙s<sup>−1</sup>). The volume of H<sub>2</sub> during potentiostatic electrolysis measurement was monitored by volume displacement in a configuration as shown in ref [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref21">21</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussions</title><p>The morphology of Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> was examined by SEM. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a) shows that nanotubes are arranged in a radial fashion. A SEM image with higher magnification (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)) shows that the surfaces of the nanotubes are very rough, which indicates that they are composed of many tiny nanoparticles.</p><p>The overall structural features of Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> was accessed via XRD experiments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). The patterns of product are well associated with those of cubic phase Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> (JCPDS No. 65-1765). The hollow structure of nanotubes can be confirmed by TEM image (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)). High resolution (HRTEM) image (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c)) shows that the nanotube is composed of tiny nanoparticles with diameters of only several nanometers. The observed interplanar spacing is 0.24 nm and 0.28 nm, which corresponds to the separation between (400) and (222) plane of cubic phase Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub>, respectively. The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of nanotubes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(d)) shows distinct diffraction rings, which can be indexed as (311), (511), (440), (533), (642) and (931) lattice planes of cubic phase Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub>.</p><p>Chemical states of Co and S were obtained from XPS characterization (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) shows the core level spectrum of the Co 2p region, with Co 2p<sub>3/2</sub> binding energies at 778.9, 781.2 and 786.5 eV. The peak at 778.9 eV suggests that there are reduced Co species in Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref25">25</xref>] . These reduced Co species are partially charged (Co<sup>δ</sup><sup>+</sup>, 0 &lt; δ &lt; 2), and δ must have a small value, because the corresponding Co 2p<sub>3/2</sub> binding energy (778.9 eV) is very close to that of metallic Co (777.9 eV) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref26">26</xref>] . In the S 2p spectrum (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)), the peak centered at 161.9 eV agrees with the binding energies of Co?S [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref28">28</xref>] .</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a) shows the representative polarization data of Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub>/GCE electrodes with different mass loadings, along with the polarization data of a bare GCE and commercial Pt/C catalyst (Johnson Matthey, Hispec 3000, 20 wt%) loaded on GCE. Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub>/GCE electrodes with different loading amounts of Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes all show apparent current density in the potential range of 0 to −0.4 V vs RHE. The electrocatalytic activity of the Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub></p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Low and (b) high magnification SEM images of the Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2201367x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> (a) XRD patterns (b) TEM image (c) HRTEM image, and (d) SAED pattern of the Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2201367x8.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> XPS spectra of (a) the Co 2p<sub>3/2</sub> and (b) the S 2p windows of Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> sample</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2201367x9.png"/></fig><p>sample is more efficient when the loading amount increased in some degree. The sample with optimal performance (loading amount: 0.855 mg∙cm<sup>−2</sup>) has a current density of 20 mA∙cm<sup>−2</sup> at an overpotential of 320 mV. However, when the loading amount is further increased, the Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> doesn’t result a better electronic property for the electrode because it may result in large interface resistance. In contrast, negligible current can be found from the bare GCE electrode, showing that the large current in Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub>/GCE can be definitely correlated with Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes. The performance of representative HER catalysts is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S1 (Electronic Supplementary Information), which shows that the performance of Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes is superior to that of Ni<sub>3</sub>S<sub>2</sub> loaded on carbon nanotubes and Fe<sub>2</sub>P/NGr nanocomposite loaded on GCE.</p><p>In a potentiostatic electrolysis experiment, the time-dependent current density recorded from a potentiostatic electrolysis shows only a little degradation in 20,000 s (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)). In an accelerated degradation experiment, cyclic voltammetry (CV) sweeps were carried out in the 1 M KOH aqueous solution between −0.380 and 0.100 V versus RHE (inset of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)). It shows that after continuous cyclic voltammetric (CV) scan for 4000 cycles, the overpotential required for the current density of 20 mA∙cm<sup>−2</sup> (η<sub>20</sub>) increases from 330 mV to 350 mV. These results suggest Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotube can afford long-term hydrogen generation in basic condition.</p><p>The faradaic efficiency of Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotube in electrolysis of water was evaluated by water-displacement method. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c) shows the comparison of the theoretical volume of hydrogen and the experimentally measured volume of hydrogen. It is shown that the faradaic yield of H<sub>2</sub> production in a potentiostatic electrolysis of water using Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotube as a HER catalyst is nearly 100%.</p><p>The Nyquist plots of the Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes at overpotentials from −200 to −370 mV (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)) exhibit classic two time-constant behavior. The semicircles at high frequencies can be related to the contact between the catalyst (Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub>) and the GCE, while those at low frequencies are correlated to the kinetics of the HER process on the surface of the catalyst. The kinetics of electrochemical reaction at an electrode’s surface is usually assessed by charge transfer resistance (R<sub>ct</sub>), with a smaller R<sub>ct</sub> value corresponding to faster kinetics. R<sub>ct</sub> was be deduced from EIS spectra by data fitting, in the present case using the equivalent circuit shown in the inset of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d). In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(e), the applied potential is plotted versus the inverse R<sub>ct</sub> on a logarithmic scale, and a Tafel slope was determined to be 135 mV∙dec<sup>−1</sup> according to the slope of linear portion in the plot. The Tafel slope of 135 mV∙dec<sup>−1</sup> suggests that a Volmer-Tafel mechanism is responsible for the HER process on the surface of Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes.</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Polarization curves of Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes and commercial Pt/C catalyst loading on GCE. (b) The time-dependent current density of Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> under overpotential of 280 mV for 20,000 s. The inset shows Polarization curves of Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotube corresponding to the initial and 4000<sup>th</sup> CV scans. (c) Current efficiency for H<sub>2</sub> production using Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub>/GCE. (d) Nyquist plots of the Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes recorded at different overpotentials in 1M KOH. The inset shows the equivalent circuit used for data fitting. (e) Semi-logarithmic plot of applied potential vs log(R<sub>ct</sub><sup>−1</sup>). Only potentials in (a) were corrected with iR drop</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2201367x10.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In summary, Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes are found to be an effective HER electrocatalyst. The optimal η<sub>20</sub> is as small as 320 mV in basic solution. Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes can work stably in alkaline solutions, and the faradic yield during electrolysis is nearly 100%. The HER process follows a Volmer-Heyrovsky mechanism. The results presented here further demonstrate the promising application potential of metal sulfide in the field of hydrogen generation from electrolysis of water.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61006049, 50925207), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2011DFG52970), the Ministry of Education of China (IRT1064), 111 Project (B13025), Jiangsu Innovation Research Team, Jiangsu Province (2011-XCL-019 and 2013-479), and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu (BK20131252).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>LihuangJin,CuncaiLv,JieWang,HanXia,YaoxingZhao,ZhipengHuang, (2016) Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> Nanotubes as an Efficient Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Electrolyte. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry,07,210-218. doi: 10.4236/ajac.2016.72018</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Supplement: Electronic Supporting Information</title>S1. ExperimentalS1.1. Materials Synthesis<p>The method used in the synthesis of Co(CO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>0.35</sub>Cl<sub>0.20</sub>(OH)<sub>1.10</sub> nanorods was adopted from those reported in ref [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref2">2</xref>] . Then, 0.6 mmol of the as-prepared Co(CO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>0.35</sub>Cl<sub>0.20</sub>(OH)<sub>1.10</sub> and 0.629 mL of a supersaturated Na<sub>2</sub>S aqueous solution were loaded into a Teflon liner (40 mL) with 30 ml distilled water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref2">2</xref>] . The liner was sealed in a stainless steel autoclave and maintained at 160˚C for 8 h, then cooled naturally to room temperature. The black precipitates were filtered off, washed with distilled water and ethanol, and then dried at 60˚C.</p>S1.2. Material Characterization<p>The morphologies were accessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, 7001F, JEOL) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, 2100, JEOL). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) experiments were carried out on a Physical Electronics PHI 5700 ESCA System. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected with a D8 ADVANCE.</p><p>The electrochemical measurements were carried out in an aqueous 1M KOH solution with an electrochemical workstation (CHI614D, CH Instrument). A three-electrode configuration was adopted in the measurements, with Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> loading on GCE as the working electrode, a graphite rodas the counter electrode and a Mercury/Mercury Oxide electrode (MOE, Hg/HgO) as the reference electrode. The reversible hydrogen evolution potential (RHE) was determined to be −0.879 V vs MOE by the open circuit potential of a clean Pt electrode in the same solution. For the evaluation of HER catalytic activity, Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> nanotubes (4 mg) were dispersed in 1 mL of water/ethanol (4/1, V/V) containing 80 μL of Nafion solution (5 wt%). The evaluation of the HER catalytic activity of Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> loaded on GCE was carried out by linear sweep voltammetry (5 mV∙s<sup>−1</sup>). The volume of H<sub>2</sub> during potentiostatic electrolysis measurement was monitored by volume displacement in a configuration as shown in ref [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>S1</label><caption><title> Summary of the HER performance of representative catalysts</title></caption><table-wrap id="1_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Catalyst</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Substrate</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mass density (mg/cm<sup>2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >η<sub>onset</sub> (mV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >η<sub>10</sub> (mV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >η<sub>20 </sub> (mV)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tafel slope (mV/dec)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Electrolyt</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni-Mo nanopowder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref4">4</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ti foil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1M NaOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co<sub>2</sub>P [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref3">3</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ti foil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni<sub>2</sub>P [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref5">5</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ti foil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >205</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CoP/CC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref6">6</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon cloth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >203</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni/MWCNT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref7">7</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni<sub>3</sub>S<sub>2</sub>/MWCNT-NC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref8">8</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >490</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >510</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >167</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni<sub>3</sub>S<sub>2</sub>/MWCNT-NC (333K) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref8">8</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KOH-treated Ni<sub>3</sub>S<sub>2</sub>/MWCNT-NC (298K) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref8">8</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >340</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KOH-treated Ni<sub>3</sub>S<sub>2</sub>/MWCNT-NC (323K) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref8">8</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >210</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni<sub>3</sub>S<sub>2</sub> (298K) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref8">8</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni<sub>3</sub>S<sub>2</sub> (333K) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref8">8</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >203</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MoB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref9">9</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >carbon-paste electrode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo<sub>2</sub>C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref9">9</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >carbon-paste electrode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >210</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>P/NGr [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref10">10</xref>] <sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >210</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >355</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >376</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MoS2/RGO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref11">11</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MoS<sub>2</sub> Nanosheets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref12">12</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Graphite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >187</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="1_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >WS<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref13">13</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.285</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >500</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >750</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >800</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >-</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WS<sub>3</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref13">13</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.285</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >670</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >710</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CoS<sub>2</sub> nanowire [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref14">14</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >rotating disk electrode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CoS<sub>2</sub> microwire [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref14">14</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >rotating disk electrode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MoSe<sub>2 </sub>film [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref15">15</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >WSe<sub>2 </sub>film [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref16">16</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon fiber paper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CoSe<sub>2</sub> nanoparticles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref17">17</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon fiber paper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MoB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref18">18</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >disk electrode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo<sub>2</sub>C/CNT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref19">19</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 M HClO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo<sub>2</sub>C/XC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref19">19</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 M HClO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NiMoN<sub>x</sub>/C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref20">20</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 M HClO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co<sub>0.6</sub>Mo<sub>1.4</sub>N<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref21">21</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >rotating disk electrode</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 M HClO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MoP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref22">22</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CoP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63759-ref23">23</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To foil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co<sub>9</sub>S<sub>8</sub> (this work)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GCE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.855</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >320</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 M KOH</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.63759-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Z.H., Chen, X.Y., Zhang, M. and Qian, Y.T. (2005) Synthesis of Co3O4 Nanorod Bunches from a Single Precursor Co(CO3)(0.35)Cl0.20(OH)(1.10). Solid State Sciences, 7, 13-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2004.10.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Z.H., Pan, L., Hu, H.B. and Zhao, S.P. (2010) Co9S8 Nanotubes Synthesized on the Basis of Nanoscale Kirkendall Effect and Their Magnetic and Electrochemical Properties. CrystEngComm, 12, 1899-1904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b923206k</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, Z., Chen, Z., Chen, Z., Lv, C., Humphrey, M.G. and Zhang, C. (2014) Cobalt Phosphide Nanorods as an Efficient Electrocatalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Nano Energy, 9, 373-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.08.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McKone, J.R., Sadtler, B.F., Werlang, C.A., Lewis, N.S. and Gray, H.B. (2013) Ni-Mo Nanopowders for Efficient Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. ACS Catalysis, 3, 166-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cs300691m</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Popczun, E.J., McKone, J.R., Read, C.G., Biacchi, A.J., Wiltrout, A.M., Lewis, N.S. and Schaak, R.E. (2013) Nanostructured Nickel Phosphide as an Electrocatalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 135, 9267-9270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja403440e</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tian, J., Liu, Q., Asiri, A.M. and Sun, X. (2014) Self-Supported Nanoporous Cobalt Phosphide Nanowire Arrays: An Efficient 3D Hydrogen-Evolving Cathode over the Wide Range of pH 0-14. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 136, 7587-7590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja503372r</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McArthur, M.A., Jorge, L., Coulombe, S. and Omanovic, S. (2014) Synthesis and Characterization of 3D Ni Nanoparticle/Carbon Nanotbe Cathodes for Hydrogen Evolution in Alkaline Electrolyte. Journal of Power Sources, 266, 365-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, T.W., Liu, C.J. and Dai, C.S. (2014) Ni3S2/Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposite as Electrode Material for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Electrolyte and Enzyme-Free Glucose Detection. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 154, 213-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.02.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vrubel, H. and Hu, X.L. (2012) Molybdenum Boride and Carbide Catalyze Hydrogen Evolution in both Acidic and Basic Solutions. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 51, 12703-12706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201207111</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, Z., Lv, C., Chen, Z., Chen, Z., Tian, F. and Zhang, C. (2015) One-Pot Synthesis of Diiron Phosphide/Nitrgen-Doped Graphene Nanocomposite for Effective Hydrogen Generation. Nano Energy, 12, 666-674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.01.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Y.G., Wang, H.L., Xie, L.M., Liang, Y.Y., Hong, G.S. and Dai, H.J. (2011) MoS2 Nanoparticles Grown on Graphene: An Advanced Catalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 133, 7296-7299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja201269b</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lukowski, M.A., Daniel, A.S., Meng, F., Forticaux, A., Li, L.S. and Jin, S. (2013) Enhanced Hydrogen Evolution Catalysis from Chemically Exfoliated Metallic MoS2 Nanosheets. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 135, 10274-10277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja404523s</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, Z., Wang, C., Chen, Z., Meng, H., Lv, C., Chen, Z., Han, R. and Zhang, C. (2014) Tungsten Sulfide Enhancing Solar-Driven Hydrogen Production from Silicon Nanowires. ACS Applied Materials &amp; Interfaces, 6, 10408-10414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/am501940x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faber, M.S., Dziedzic, R., Lukowski, M.A., Kaiser, N.S., Ding, Q. and Jin, S. (2014) High-Performance Electrocatalysis Using Metallic Cobalt Pyrite (CoS2) Micro- and Nanostructures. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 136, 10053-10061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/am501940x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kong, D.S., Wang, H.T., Cha, J.J., Pasta, M., Koski, K.J., Yao, J. and Cui, Y. (2013) Synthesis of MoS2 and MoSe2 Films with Vertically Aligned Layers. Nano Letters, 13, 1341-1347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl400258t</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, H.T., Kong, D.S., Johanes, P., Cha, J.J., Zheng, G.Y., Yan, K., Liu, N.A. and Cui, Y. (2013) MoSe2 and WSe2 Nanofilms with Vertically Aligned Molecular Layers on Curved and Rough Surfaces. Nano Letters, 13, 3426-3433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl401944f</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kong, D.S., Wang, H.T., Lu, Z.Y. and Cui, Y. (2014) CoSe2 Nanoparticles Grown on Carbon Fiber Paper: An Efficient and Stable Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 136, 4897-4900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja501497n</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vrubel, H. and Hu, X.L. (2012) Molybdenum Boride and Carbide Catalyze Hydrogen Evolution in both Acidic and Basic Solutions. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 51, 12703-12706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201207111</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, W.F., Wang, C.H., Sasaki, K., Marinkovic, N., Xu, W., Muckerman, J.T., Zhu, Y. and Adzic, R.R. (2013) Highly Active and Durable Nanostructured Molybdenum Carbide Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Production. Energy &amp; Environmental Science, 6, 943-951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2ee23891h</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, W.F., Sasaki, K., Ma, C., Frenkel, A.I., Marinkovic, N., Muckerman, J.T., Zhu, Y.M. and Adzic, R.R. (2012) Hydrogen-Evolution Catalysts Based on Non-Noble Metal Nickel-Molybdenum Nitride Nanosheets. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 51, 6131-6135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201200699</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cao, B.F., Veith, G.M., Neuefeind, J.C., Adzic, R.R. and Khalifah, P.G. (2013) Mixed Close-Packed Cobalt Molybdenum Nitrides as Non-Noble Metal Electrocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 135, 19186-19192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja4081056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xiao, P., Sk, M.A., Thia, L., Ge, X., Lim, R.J., Wang, J.Y., Lim, K.H. and Wang, X. (2014) Molybdenum Phosphide as an Efficient Electrocatalyst for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Energy &amp; Environmental Science, 7, 2624-2629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4EE00957F</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63759-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Popczun, E.J., Read, C.G., Roske, C.W., Lewis, N.S. and Schaak, R.E. (2014) Highly Active Electrocatalysis of the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction by Cobalt Phosphide Nanoparticles. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 53, 5427-5430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201402646</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>