<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJIBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Industrial and Business Management</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-5167</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajibm.2016.62013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJIBM-63718</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Business&amp;Economics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Literature Review of Representation Models of E-Business Models from the Perspective of Value Creation
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>hicheng</surname><given-names>Guo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Management School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>zcguofuture@163.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>02</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>129</fpage><lpage>135</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>21</month>	<year>February</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Business model is abstract rational cognition about how corporation created, delivered and obtained value and is the enterprise’s core competitive advantages from the perspective of value creation. This article found that research perspective of representation models of e-commerce business model mostly concentrated on value creation perspective and there are two categories: EBMO and e&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;-value Model. We respectively discuss the two categories in order to make better understanding of the current development in e-commerce business model research.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Value Creation</kwd><kwd> E-Commerce</kwd><kwd> E-Business Model</kwd><kwd> Representation Model</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Since 1990s, with the rapid development of the Internet, e-commerce has begun to emerge at that historic moment. The impact of e-commerce, which not only affects the business as well as people’s work, but also affects people’s behavior, has become an important part of the national economy growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref1">1</xref>] . Due to the rapid development of e-commerce, the concept of business model has been the focus of substantial attention from both academics and practitioners [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref2">2</xref>] . E-commerce business model is significantly different from the business model of traditional corporate, and has played an important role in the development and expansion. How did e-commerce company win other competitors in the fierce market competition? It not only depends on its own strength, but also depends on business model. Competition in modern corporations is the competition of business rather than the competition of products.</p><p>This paper includes four parts: 1) the introduction describes the writing background of this paper; 2) the concept of business model and e-business model allows readers to deepen the understanding of this topic; 3) Section 3 is the main part of this paper, and discusses in detail the research status, classification and the tendency of the e-business models research from the perspective of value creation; 4) the conclusion briefly reviews the previous parts of this study.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Business Model and E-Business Model</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Business Model Definitions</title><p>The character of business model firstly appeared in 1957 in the paper text [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref3">3</xref>] , business model has been prevalent with the rapid development and popularization of Internet as well as rapid development of e-commerce, and it has gradually formed an independent field of study with an explosion in the number of articles published. So far, however, despite the overall surge in the literature on business models, the concept of business model has not been consensus in academic; there are different explanations from different scholars due to their different research perspective. At a general level, the business model has been referred to as a statement, a description, are presentation, an architecture, a conceptual tool or model, a structural template, a method, a framework, a pattern, and a set [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>A business model describes the logic of a “business system” for creating value, which lies behind the actual processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref4">4</xref>] . Another, a business model is a description of the value a company offers to one or several segments of customers and the architecture of the firm and its network of partners for creating, marketing and delivering this value and relationship capital, in order to generate profitable and sustainable revenue streams [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref5">5</xref>] . Amit &amp; Zott (2001) defined that the business model depicts the content, structure, and governance of transactions designed so as to create value through the exploitation of business opportunities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref6">6</xref>] . Based on the fact that transactions connect activities, the authors further evolved this definition to conceptualize a firm’s business model as a system of interdependent activities that transcends the focal firm and spans its boundaries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref7">7</xref>] . Similarly, business models consist of four interlocking elements that taken together, create and deliver value. These are customer value proposition, profit formula, key resources, and key processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref8">8</xref>] . And Teece (2010) defined that a business model articulates the logic, the data and other evidence that support a value proposition for the customer, and a viable structure of revenues and costs for the enterprise delivering that value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref9">9</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. E-Business Model Definitions</title><p>The research stream that, to date, has devoted the greatest attention to business models concerns e-business. The term e-business means “doing business electronically” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref2">2</xref>] . Shafer et al. (2005) reviewed 12 definitions in established publications during the period 1998-2000, finding that 8 were related to e-business [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref10">10</xref>] . Similarly, Zott and Amit’s (2011) literature review confirmed this trend, in a total of 49 conceptual studies in which the business model is clearly defined, almost one fourth of the studies are related to e-business [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>The term e-business model (e-commerce business model or electronic business model) was first defined by IBM in the 1990s as the transformation of key business processes through the use of internet technologies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref11">11</xref>] . An electronic business model is an important baseline for the development of e-commerce system applications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref12">12</xref>] . Rappa (2007) defines the e-business model in its most basic sense, as a method of doing business by which a company can sustain itself by generating revenue. He identifies how a firm makes money by specifying where it is positioned in the value chain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref13">13</xref>] . Timmers (1999) defines an e-business model as an architecture for product, service and information flows, including a description of the various business actors and their roles; the potential benefits for the various actors; and the various sources and revenues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref14">14</xref>] . Weill et al. (2001) describe eight so-called “atomic” e-business models, each of which describes a different way of conducting business electronically; e-business initiatives can be represented by pure atomic business models or by combining them [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref15">15</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Study of Representation Models of E-Business Models from the Perspective of Value Creation</title><p>Research on e-business models can be organized around two complementary streams: The first aims to describe generic e-business models and provide typologies; the second focuses on the components of e-business models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref2">2</xref>] . And many authors have attempted to represent e-commerce business models through a representation models (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref16">16</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref27">27</xref>] ). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> presents a summary of these efforts.</p><p>Through analysis these literatures, we surprisingly found that about 80% of these research of e-commerce business models was based on the perspective of value creation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), and Yuan Lei (2007) have took a similar conclusion that business model is fundamentally logic of value creation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref3">3</xref>] . The perspective of value creation in the research of e-commerce business model is a widespread and greatest influent field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref27">27</xref>] . The perspective of value creation can help to understanding the dynamic and systematic of business models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref7">7</xref>] . Similarly, Yuan Lei (2007) propose a framework, which could be called “3-4-8” constitutes system, for understand and dialysis business model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref3">3</xref>] . Therefore, this framework can help to examining the components of these representation models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref28">28</xref>] .</p><p>Among the articles of the research perspective of value creation, there are 50% of those which were employed the model of EBMO, as well as some of other articles were employed the e<sup>3</sup>-value model. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> presents a summary of these efforts.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Components of representation models of e-business models</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Author(s), Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Components</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Numbers</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gordijn et al. (2001) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref12">12</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Actor, Value object, Value offering, Value activity, Value port, Value interface, Value exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dubosson-Torbay et al. (2001) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref19">19</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Product innovation, Customer relationship, Infrastructure management, Financial aspect</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Afuah et al. (2001) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref20">20</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scope, Price, Connected activities, Implementation, Capabilities, Sustainability</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alt Zimmermann (2000) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref21">21</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mission, Structure, Processes, Revenues, Legal issues, Technology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wendy L. Currie (2004) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref22">22</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strategic positioning, Product/Services Portfolio, Value proposition, Value capture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Linder &amp; Cantrell S (2001) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref23">23</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pricing model, Revenue model, Commerce process model, Internet-enabled commerce relationship, Organizational form, Value proposition</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mahadevan (2000) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref24">24</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Value stream, Revenue stream, Logistical stream</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Van Der Vost et al. (2002) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref25">25</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Value proposition, Roles of participants, Processes, Functionalities, Applications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Osterwalder (2005) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref16">16</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Relationship, Value configuration, Capability, Cost structure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bhavini Desai &amp; Wendy Currie (2008) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref26">26</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Market positioning, Customer expectation, Value proposition, Products and services, Revenue, Delivery model</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdelkafi N &amp; Makhotin S et al. (2013) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref17">17</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Value proposition, Value creation, Value delivery, Value capture, Value communication</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The research perspective of representation models of e-commerce business models</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Research perspective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Article numbers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Proportion</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Representative model</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The perspective of value creation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E-business model ontology for modeling e-business (EBMO, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref16">16</xref>] ) e<sup>3</sup>-value Model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref12">12</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other perspective</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other e-business Models</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The representation models of e-commerce business model from perspective of value creation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Author(s), Year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Components of Model</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Numbers</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Osterwalder et al. (2001, 2005) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref16">16</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Product (Value Proposition); Customer Interface (Target Customer, Distribution Channel, Relationship); Infrastructure Management (Value Configuration, Core Competency, Partner Network); Financial Aspects (Cost Structure, Revenue Model)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gordijn (2001) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref12">12</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Actor, Value Object, Value Offering, Value Activity, Value Port, Value Interface, Value Exchange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Other authors (the numbers that were cited are less than 2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. E-Business Model Ontology (EBMO)</title><p>Osterwalder and Pigneur (2005) proposed a new e-Business Model Ontology. The e-business model ontology describes the logic of a “business system” for creating value in the Internet era and composed of four main pillars, which are product innovation, infrastructure management, customer relationship and financial aspects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref16">16</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). This model exhaustively describes components of e-business model from the perspective of value creation by using the networking modeling approach [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref3">3</xref>] , as well as has been widely applied by many scholars (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref17">17</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref29">29</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref33">33</xref>] ) and managers in both academics and practices.</p><p>Susan Lambert (2008) proposed a conceptual framework for business model research that provides a basis for theory development and debate. This business model conceptual framework will guide future research and that it will be reviewed and refined, just as the financial reporting conceptual framework has been reviewed and refined over decades [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref29">29</xref>] . Delvin Grant (2013) use EBMO to analyze e-business models in online real estate. The author investigate the similarities and differences among e-business models and how e-business model differentiation affects company success to discovering which business model components are important as well as which model are more successful. They discover that differences include the use of revenue streams for generating revenue, the extent of partnerships and the role play in a company’s success [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref18">18</xref>] . Based on EBMO, Abdelkafi et al. (2013) introduces a new framework, in which a business model denotes a value-focused concept with five dimensions: value proposition, value communication, value creation, value delivery and value capture in the field of electric mobility. The combination of patterns from different dimensions can lead to the systematic generation of business model innovations and evaluates the extent to which business model patterns can be useful for the field of electronic mobility and how they can be adapted to fit into the new context [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref17">17</xref>] . Konstantinos N. G et al. (2011) emphasizes the need for ITS to take advantage of the developments in Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and the internet, and proposes some e-business model framework for ITS, as well as addresses sustainability issues and aspects of the network economy for ITS companies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref30">30</xref>] . Dubosson-Torbay et al. (2001) proposed a theoretical e-business model framework for doing business in the Internet era. This framework’s objective is to define critical success factors, based on a field study in order to find out and compare the performance indicators used by e-business firms which are competing with similar business models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref19">19</xref>] . Xiaobo Wu et al. (2010) explore the new latecomer advantage implied in the phenomena of overshooting and non-consuming. Based on inductive theory building with a comparative case study, the authors find that latecomer firms, though disadvantaged in technological capabilities and market resources, can successfully introduce disruptive technologies from advanced economies into emerging economies through secondary business-model innovations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref31">31</xref>] . Basing on EBMO, Novaes Zilber et al. (2012) described the business model of small companies that have adopted e-business in an emerging Latin American country and found that the owners/sharehold- ers play a central role in making decisions about the adoption of e-business as well as the main value delivered from using the internet was improved brand and/or product awareness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref32">32</xref>] . Using EBMO, Kiani et al. (2009) proposed causal loop diagram (CLD) and use it as a useful tool to capture the structure of e-business systems in order to achieve a better understanding of an e-business model. And, the proposed CLD provides managers with significant insight into the e-business models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref33">33</xref>] .</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> E-business model ontology (EBMO)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-2120698x6.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. E<sup>3</sup>-Value E-Business Model</title><p>Gordijn and Akkermans et al (2001) presented a ontology of e-business model which called e<sup>3</sup>-value to developing e-business model ontology which centers around the core concept of value, and expresses how value is created, interpreted and exchanged within a multi-party stakeholder network [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref12">12</xref>] . This ontology which composes the components of actor, value object, value offering, value activity, value port, value interface, value exchange has been widely applied by many scholars (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref34">34</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref38">38</xref>] ) by abstracting a simplified model of value creation.</p><p>E<sup>3</sup>-value ontology focus on the notion of value and the way objects of value are created, exchanged and consumed in a stakeholder network [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref12">12</xref>] . C. Huemer et al (2008) focus on inter-organizational systems to describing e-business model for corporate network of actor and present a discussion of different approaches to present the e<sup>3</sup>-value concepts by means of UML. This approach can align specifying inter-organizational business processes for future work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref34">34</xref>] . Glova J et al. (2014) apply e<sup>3</sup>-value to model value creation and value exchange within an e-business network of multiple business actors. And author use this approach to reduced to its core elements which includes value proposition, distribution channels, the customer of the company, and to explaining how a multi-actor network creates, distributes and consumes value by production of a good or providing a service [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref35">35</xref>] . OuYangfeng (2007) developed structure analysis based on e<sup>3</sup>-value ontology method, and study the e-business model of data service provider. This study revealed the internal dynamics mechanism of e-business models by constructing a value model to modeling the process how value created, added and exchanged between the participants in models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref36">36</xref>] . And then, based on e<sup>3</sup>-value ontology method, OuYangfeng et al. (2008) constructed the value model for electronic books business model and carried out the profitability for all the actors involved and viability analysis of the business model through simulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref37">37</xref>] . Using e<sup>3</sup>-valuee-business model, Weiwei Li and Yue Dai (2011) designs one prototypical example of an online database provider company and discusses various business model value under different scenarios [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref38">38</xref>] . The e<sup>3</sup>-value ontology which analysis the corporate business models can link the corporates and consumers through the value chain and dialysis components in system of e-business models by modeling and simulating the models, as well as estimate the profitability and rationality of value model of e-business models.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Due to the rapid development of e-commerce, the concept of business model has been the focus of substantial attention from both academics and practitioners [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63718-ref2">2</xref>] . Business model is abstract rational cognition about how corporation created, delivered and obtained value and is the enterprise’s core competitive advantages. Although, the business model is often studied without an explicit definition of the concept, our review found that research perspective of representation models of e-commerce business model mostly concentrated on value creation perspective (approximately 80% of all articles) and there are two categories: EBMO (approximately 50% of the articles from the perspective of value creation) and e<sup>3</sup>-value model (15% of those articles). The e-business models exhaustively describe components of e-business model from the perspective of value creation by using the networking modeling approach, and have been widely applied by many scholars. The e<sup>3</sup>-value ontology which analyzes the corporate business models can link the corporations and consumers through the value chain and dialysis components in system of e-business models by modeling and simulating the models, and estimate the profitability and rationality of value model of e-business models.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>ZhichengGuo, (2016) A Literature Review of Representation Models of E-Business Models from the Perspective of Value Creation. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management,06,129-135. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2016.62013</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.63718-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turban, E., King, D., Lee, J., Liang, T.-P. and Turban, D. (2012) Electronic Commerce 2012: A Managerial and Social Networks Perspective. 7th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zott, C., Amit, R. and Massa, L. (2011) The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. Journal of Management, 1-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names> L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Reconstruction of Business Model Theory System</article-title><source> China Industrial Economy</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 70</fpage>-<lpage>79</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peterovic. O., Kittl, C., et al. (2001) Developing Business Models for E-Business. International Conference on Electronic Commerce 2001, Vienna, 31 October-4 November 2001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Osterwalder, A. (2004) The Business Model Ontology—A Proposition in a Design Science Approach. PhD Thesis, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amit, R. and Zott, C. (2001) Value Creation in E-Business. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 493-520. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.187</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zott, C. and Amit, R. (2010) Designing Your Future Business Model: An Activity System Perspective. Long Range Planning, 43, 216-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johnson, M.W. and Christensen, C.M. (2008) Reinventing Your Business Model. Harvard Business Review, 11, 50-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Teece, D.J. (2010) Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 43, 172-194. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shafer, S.M., et al. (2005) The Power of Business Model. Business Horizons, 48, 199-207. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2004.10.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, F. (2007) What Is E-Business? How the Internet Transforms Organizations. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gordijn, J. and Akkermans, H. (2001) Ontology-Based Operators for E-Business Model De- and Re-Construction. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Capture, Victoria, Canada, 21-23 October 2001, 60-67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rappa, M. (2009) Business Models on the Web: Managing the Digital Enterprise. 
http://digitalenterprise.org/models/models.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Timmers, P. (1998) Business Models for Electronic Markets. Journal of Electronic Markets, 8, 3-8. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10196789800000016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weill, P. and Vitale, M.R. (2001) Place to Space: Migrating to E-Business Models. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2005) Clarifying Business Model: Origins Present and Future of the Concept. Business, 15, 1-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdelkafi, N., Makhotin, S., et al. (2013) Business Model Innovations for Electronic Mobility—What Can Be Learned from Existing Business Model Patterns? International Journal of Innovation Management, 17, 1-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grant, D. (2014) Analysis of E-Business Models in Real Estate. Electronic Commerce Research, 14, 25-50. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10660-013-9126-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dubosson-Torbay, M., Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. (2001) E-Business Model Design, Classification and Measurements. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44, 5-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Afuah, A. (2005) Business Models: A Strategic Management Approach. McGraw-Hill, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alt, R. and Zimmerman, H.D. (2001) Introduction to Special Section on Business Models. Electronic Markets, 11, 3-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Currie, W.L. (2004) Value Creation from E-Business Models. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 370-408.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Linder, J. and Cantrell, S. (2001) Changing Business Models: Surveying the Landscape. PhD Thesis, Accenture Institute for Strategic Change, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mahadevan, B. (2000) Business Models for Internet-Based E-Commerce: An Anatomy. California Management Review, 42, 55-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166053</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Der Vorst, J.G.A.J., Van Dongen, S., Nouguier, S. and Hilhorst, R. (2002) E-Business Initiatives in Food Supply Chains: Definition and Typology of Electronic Business Models. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 5, 119-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13675560210148641</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Desai, B. and Currie, W. (2005) Towards the ASP E-Business Model: A Conceptual Framework for Mapping ASP Specific Value Propositions. Journal of Internet Commerce, 4, 79-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J179v04n01_04</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xiang, G.P., Yang, Z., et al. (2014) A Literature Review of Business Models and the Construction of Theoretical Framework from the Perspective of Value Creation: Coding and Refinement Based on Grounded Theory. Foreign Economics &amp; Management, 36, 32-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, J.W. and Wang, Y.J. (2010) The Research of Conceptual Models of Business Models Base on the Value of the Triangular Logic. Foreign Economics &amp; Management, 6, 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lambert, S. (2008) A Conceptual Framework for Business Model Research. Proceedings of the 21st Bled E-Conference E-Collaboration: Overcoming Boundaries through Multi-Channel Interaction, Bled, Slovenia, 15-18 June 2008, 277-289.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Konstantinos, N.G. and Feng, L. (2011) Developing Sustainable E-Business Models for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 353, 200-211.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, X.B., Ma, R.F., et al. (2010) How Do Latecomer Firms Capture Value from Disruptive Technologies? A Secondary Business-Model Innovation Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57, 51-62. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2009.2033045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zilber, N. and de Araújo, B. (2012) Small Companies Innovations in Emerging Countries: E-Business Adoption and Its Business Model. Journal of Technology Management &amp; Innovation, 7, 102-116. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000200009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kiani, B., Gholamian, M., Hamzehei, A. and Hosseini, S. (2009) Using Causal Loop Diagram to Achieve a Better Understanding of E-Business Models. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 7, 159-167.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huemer, C., Schmidt, A., et al. (2008) A UML Profile for the E3-Value E-Business Model Ontology. 3rd International Workshop on Business/IT Alignment and Interoperability, Springer LNCS, 7-9 June, 1-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Glova, J., Sabol, T., et al. (2014) Business Models for the Internet of Things Environment. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 1122-1129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00566-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>OuYang</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>The Structured Analysis of E-Business Models Based on E3-Value: Taking DSP as an Example</article-title><source> Scientific Management Research</source><volume> 25</volume>,<fpage> 73</fpage>-<lpage>76</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">OuYang, F., Zhao, H.D., et al. (2008) The Simulation Analysis of the Online Publishing Business Model Based on E3-Value. China Soft Science, 3, 134-139.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63718-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, W.W. and Dai, Y. (2011) Value Simulation of Business Model Based on E3-Value Model. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Information, Services and Management Engineering, Beijing, 26-28 December 2011, 484-486.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>