<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2016.73030</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-63484</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Rotating Squeezed Vacua as Time Machines
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>.</surname><given-names>Al Saleh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>L.</surname><given-names>A. Al Asfar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>Mahroussah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>salwams@ksu.edu.as(.AS)</email>;<email>433107473@student.ksu.edu.sa(LAAA)</email>;<email>amahroussah@ksu.edu.sa(AM)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>02</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>304</fpage><lpage>311</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>14</month>	<year>February</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Squeezed quantum vacua seems to violate the averaged null energy conditions (ANEC’s), because they have a negative energy density. When treated as a perfect fluid, rapidly rotating Casimir plates will create vorticity in the vacuum bounded by them. The geometry resulting from an arbitrarily extended Casimir plates along their axis of rotation is similar to van Stockum spacetime. We observe closed timelike curves (CTC’s) forming in the exterior of the system resulting from frame dragging. The exterior geometry of this system is similar to Kerr geometry, but because of violation of ANEC, the Cauchy horizon lies outside the system unlike Kerr blackholes, giving more emphasis on whether spacetime is multiply connected at the microscopic level. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Squeezed quantum vacua seems to violate the averaged null energy conditions (ANEC’s)</kwd><kwd> because they have a negative energy density. When treated as a perfect fluid</kwd><kwd> rapidly rotating Casimir plates will create vorticity in the vacuum bounded by them. The geometry resulting from an arbitrarily extended Casimir plates along their axis of rotation is similar to van Stockum spacetime. We observe closed timelike curves (CTC’s) forming in the exterior of the system resulting from frame dragging. The exterior geometry of this system is similar to Kerr geometry</kwd><kwd> but because of violation of ANEC</kwd><kwd> the Cauchy horizon lies outside the system unlike Kerr blackholes</kwd><kwd> giving more emphasis on whether spacetime is multiply connected at the microscopic level.</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>If we examined the compatibility of squeezed vacuum energy with the energy conditions imposed by general relativity we notice a clear violation of them by the squeezed vacuum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref1">1</xref>] . Thus squeezed vacuum behaves like an exotic matter. It is tempting to link the violation of ANEC’s by squeezed vacua and their geometric back reaction. We can “stir” the squeezed vacuum by letting the Casimir plates (or general boundary condition) rotate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref2">2</xref>] . This rotation should remove the pressure on the plates and create an effect analogous to vorticity in fluids. We calculated the geometry resulting from this system and the conditions that should be satisfied to create the closed timelike curves (CTC’s) near the system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). This calculation ignores however the quantum vacuum in the exterior, it is conjectured that the exterior vacuum will prevent the formation of CTC’s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref3">3</xref>] . In our calculation we demonstrate other possible effects that might save chronology in this setup. Nevertheless, this system is a good example of how quantum vacuum is needed to stabilise geometry. Finally, we proposed a method for maintenance of traversable wormholes using the rotating Casimir plates.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Vorticity of Squeezed Vacua</title><p>Consider a scalar quantum field,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. With boundary conditions created by Casimir plates separated by a dis- tance L on the x-axis. In an arbitrary curved spacetime, the expectation value of the normally-ordered stress- energy tensor is given by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref4">4</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula485"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This result comes from zeta regularisation of the expression:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula486"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>since the boundary conditions are in x-axis we write<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. However, the expression above is independent of</p><p>which coordinates we take into consideration, or even if we assumed that the plates are arbitrary oriented in the</p><p>x − y plane, i.e.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Moreover, the value will not change even if we let the plates rotate around the</p><p>z-axis with an angular speed<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. What would change however is the polarisation of the squeezed vacuum. The direction in which the refractive index is more than unity and photons propagating between the</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> A cross-section of the rotating Casimir plates, creating vacuum vorticity. The z-axis is the axis of symmetry</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x12.png"/></fig><p>plates will experience Scharnhorst effect. If we let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the vector representing pola-</p><p>risation of the squeezed vacuum. Where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are vector fields in the x and y directions respec-</p><p>tively. If we considered the time derivative of this polarisation vector we get:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula487"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the tangential velocity vector. The expression (3), is the definition of vorticity vector of a fluid<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Light paths between the rotating plates would look like spirals in spacetime as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. Now, we impose yet another condition on the system to get a pressureless vacuum or vacuum dust. In order to do that the angular speed of the plates should be:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula488"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Background Geometry of Rotating Squeezed Vacuum</title><p>An Ansatz corresponding to the Solution to the Einstein field equations for a pressuresless fluid (dust) with vorticity is made by considering the van Stockum geometry expressed by the frame fields [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref5">5</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula489"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The Killing vector fields are<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We can also write the line element―in cylindrical coor- dinates:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula490"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with coordinate condition:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula491"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>But from (1) and (4), we first have<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We equate both expressions for the density and get the value angular speed in terms of L. Solution for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is given by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref6">6</xref>] :</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The null geodesics within the rotating system. Light propagating between the rotating plates will make helical paths in spacetime. Moving in the polarised squeezed vacua with the lower refractive index</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x28.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula492"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where w is the Lambert W function. The product <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which corresponds to the tangential velocity of the plates, should be less than 1 or the solution is meaningless, otherwise we’ll allow the plates to rotate at a tangential velocity greater than the speed of light. This leads to a conclusion that the solution proposed in (6) could be valid when the separation between the plates is comparable to the Compton wavelengths of relativistic elementary particles―like the electron―, at first glimpse. Now we use (4) to get an exact number for the acceptable separation between the plates <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> &#197;. The result predicts separation within the quantum mechanical realm, not very extreme, where quantum gravity effects are assumed to be.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Closed Timelike Curves near the Solution</title><p>We focus now on the exterior of the system viz<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We examine the spacetime at<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The frames are dragged severely such that light cones become tangent to the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> plane. As we move outward we see that the fames <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the light cone become more tilted forming closed timelike curves (CTC’s) around the system. We observe that the circular paths described above are not timelike geodesics. Thus, to enter them an observer must accelerate first. This is similar to the van Stockum solution. Thereby we can classify curves around this system in the following way as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p> Closed Spacelike Curves<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>: Observers will just circle around the rotating system, no particle accelerating from the exterior can ever enter this region.</p><p> Closed Null Curve (Cauchy Horizon)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>: Only null rays can orbit around the system, it forms a horizon from particle accelerating from the outside.</p><p> Closed Timelike Curves<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>: particles from the interior can never escape to them, and particles from the outside need to accelerate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to maintain in these curves. However if a particle stopped accelerating while in these curves, a very strange thing happens, it might have multiple biographies! Note that the CTC’s lie before the Cauchy horizon with respect to an accelerating observer coming from infinity.</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> An illustration showing the closed null curves (Cauchy Horizon) and CTC’s outside the rotating system</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x40.png"/></fig><p>For the calculated separation between the plates the condition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is indeed satisfied. Now turn to the quantum effects associated with those CTC’s, they cannot be ignored here as the whole system is rather microscopic. Hawking and Ellis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref7">7</xref>] had argued that for a CTC to form, weak energy conditions (or more generally averaged null energy conditions ANEC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref8">8</xref>] ) must be violated. If we took our stress-energy tensor (1) and integrated along a loop surrounding the rotating system <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with respect to an affine parameter a, we get:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula493"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> a one form reduced by our affine parameter. Equation (7) clearly meets the conjecture of Hawking and Ellis regarding energy conditions. This makes the solution physical, the value of vacuum density decreases you let the separation between the plates increase; unlike Tipler’s Cylinder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref9">9</xref>] . The second conjecture made by Hawking is that such stress energy tensor cannot create CTC’s on a finite region of spacetime. That implies that the rotating plates mush be infinite in length, this does not appear in the requirement of this solution but for practical purposes, the separation between the plates is extremely small compared to their length―if we picked any length in the classical domain. However, we paid a large price for making CTC’s that seems to defy the Chronology Protection. That is the CTC’s are very small regions that only quantum particles can enter them, the gravitational effects of the rotating system is very small implying the CTC’s has only microscopic effects.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Quantum Effects in the CTC’s</title><p>Despite the apparent possibility for this system to defy causality, this solution is highly unstable. To illustrate this, we need to study quantum effects resulting in the CTC’s. Let a scalar field and a detector be coupled to that field. We shall calculate the transition amplitude for the detector’s excitation by observing particles created from the field<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We start by assuming the field is massless and coupled to the detector via a weak monopole coupling. We care about the coupling term in their Lagrangian <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where g is small coupling constant and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the time-dependent monopole operator. The detector has an energy states described by the associated Hilbert space<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The field has an associated Fock space. We are interested in the transition amplitude from the initial state <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to the final state <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the Hilbert space for the detector and the field<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The transition amplitude shall refer to excitation of the detector energy state above initial ground state due to particle creation by the scalar field. Hence it is rather natural to assume the final state in the Fock space would be<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We write the first order perturbation term for the transition amplitude<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula494"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the proper time of the detector. We may use Heisenberg equation to rewrite the operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula495"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (11) into (10) to get:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula496"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>To calculate the probability, we square the term and sum over the energies:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula497"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the response function which is given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula498"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It could be interpreted as the Fourier transform of the two-point Wightman function for positive modes:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The task now is to calculate the latter function, which depends on the path the detector follows as it is a function of the proper time. The Wightman function depends on the path the detector follows, since it is a CTC that implies that the proper time is described by a periodic function. That means that the Wightman function for positive frequency <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> could tern to negative frequency one <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> when the detector completes the cycle in the CTC meaning loss of Unitarity. If we considered the detector a fermion coupled with a charge to a field (like the electrodynamic interaction), the detector could be scattered by its past self. Hence the Feynman diagram with two vertices can be written as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula499"><label>(15a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula500"><label>(15b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>With identifying the points A with C and B with D. We get a “loop” diagram instead of tree. A question arises here about the Unitarity of such processes, and how can they affect the stability of the system. More detailed argument about QFT in CTCs are made in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref6">6</xref>] showing Unitarity loss in further detail. As <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> demonstrates how tree diagram turns into a loop diagram in CTC’s, since loop diagram appear a lot in self- energy terms of a particle. It is possible that they could be explained by multiple-connectedness of spacetime near their energy scale. The results from this paper seems to support that quantum mechanics implies a multiply- connected spacetime background.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Traversable Wormholes Maintenance by Rotating Squeezed Vacuum</title><p>Einstein-Rosen bridges does not allow matter/information to be transferred from one mouth to the other. The</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Second order fyenman diagram of a particle interacting with it’s past self. By identifying the points A with C and B with D</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x67.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> The tree diagrame becomes a loop diagram for a particle in a CTC. This Loop is a result of previous identification. And questions unitarity od the S matrix in CTC’s</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x68.png"/></fig><p>ANEC permits them from doing so, as the bridges are not stable and pinch off at the speed of light. When using exotic matter, or stress-energy tensor that violates ANEC like in (9), singularities and horizons are prevented in this case. Such that when passing through one of the wormholes’ mouth, there must be null geodesics with tangent vectors <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfying (9), this can be achieved by the stress-energy of the squeezed vacuum. An example of a static, spherically-symmetric wormhole is given by the line element [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref8">8</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula501"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where l is the proper radial distance from the wormhole’s mouth, i.e. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>at the mouth. Moreover, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a function of l, that is everywhere finite (no isolated horizon condition), and approximated at a distance far away</p><p>from the mouth by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The violation of the ANEC is by the condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref10">10</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63484-formula502"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x74.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the tension and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the “exotic” matter density. The rotating Casimir plates provide such energy conditions with the rotation (centrifugal force) canceling out the pressure and balancing the plates. From (1) we have <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as above, and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Thus, rotating Casimir vacuum can be used to support this wormhole. In order to this, we place the rotating plates<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, such that the mouth is at the axis of symmetry of the rotating plates. Outside the plates, as we discussed earlier, Kerr geometry is produced satisfying the conditions for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> that produces CTC’s at the exterior, in order for the system to satisfy Einstein field equations.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Discussion</title><p>This paper aims to shine the light on the possibility of violating NAEC by quantum field theory and create exotic geometries from them. The setup above showed that we could be able to make quantum time machines by squeezed vacuum. This created problems with the quantum field theory itself regarding Unitarity. Calculations by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63484-ref6">6</xref>] showed that Unitarity is lost in periodic proper time functions in the correlation function in CTC’s. We could explore this problem further by entangling two particles one in the CTC and the other is away from it. After a while the entanglement would be destroyed as the first particle goes back to the time before it was entangled with the latter. In our rotating plates, we propose that this problem could be resolved by conjecturing that</p><p>the system pays for the lost energy/information, as it required energy give approximately by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7502613x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. If</p><p>we considered rotating charged Casimir plates we notice that the condition (4) would be modified, and we have less rotating velocity to maintain dust solution, as a result will have a larger Cauchy horizon. The exterior geometry would be similar to the Kerr-Neuman geometry. We notice a pattern or an analogy between blackholes geometry and the one of squeezed vacua. Because of the violation of energy conditions by the squeezed vacua, the Cauchy horizon (CH) lies outside the system unlike blackholes who have the CH inside of them. Since CTC’s could be made from boundary conditions on quantum vacuum, this raises a question about whether CTC’s could form by quantum fluctuations, and the quantum foam is filled with them? In other words, quantum spacetime is multiply-connected.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Conclusion</title><p>Squeezed vacuum violating ANEC could be used to create quantum time machines by creating microscopic CTC’s and also maintaining traversable wormholes when forcing the boundary conditions (Casimir plates) to rotate at sufficient angular velocity to remove the pressure made by the squeezed vacuum and create vorticity defined by the polarisation of the refractive index between the plates. Vorticity of the squeezed vacuum could be understood by plotting the light trajectory inside the rotating plates that are found to be making spirals in spacetime. The squeezed vacuum has characteristics similar to van-Stockum dust and an advantage above it by violating ANEC that allow CTC’s to form outside the system and a disadvantage of only making CTC’s at the microscale. This solution resulting from semi-classical general relativity, but also appears to violate Unitarity; in the future we aim to investigate in detail the quantum effects appearing in such CTC’s and whether they could allow this solution to be stable or not. From fundamental point of view, this solution could demonstrate that the quantum spacetime is multiply connected, and unitarity is saved if we give up the notion of locality (in space- time).</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research project was supported by a grant from the “Research Center of the Female Scientific and Medical Colleges”, Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University.</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>S. AlSaleh,L. A. AlAsfar,A.Mahroussah, (2016) Rotating Squeezed Vacua as Time Machines. Journal of Modern Physics,07,304-311. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2016.73030</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.63484-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kuo, C.-I and Ford, L.H. (1993) Physical Review D, 47, 4510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.47.4510</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63484-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Impens, F., Contreras-Reyes, A.M., Maia Neto, P.A., Dalvit, D.A.R., Guérout, R., Lambrecht, A. and Reynaud, S. (2010) Europhysics Letters, 92, Article ID: 40010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/92/40010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63484-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hawking, S.W. (1992) Physical Review D, 46, 603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.46.603</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63484-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liberati, S., Sonego, S. and Visser, M. (2001) Physical Review D, 63, Article ID: 085003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.63.085003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63484-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Stockum, W. (1938) The Gravitational Field of a Distribution of Particles Rotating about an Axis of Symmetry. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 57, 135-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0370164600013699</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63484-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boulware, D.G. (1992) Physical Review D, 46, 4421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.46.4421</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63484-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hawking, S.W. and Ellis, G.F.R. (1973) The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511524646</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63484-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thome, K.S. (1993) Closed Timelike Curves. General Relativity and Gravitation 1992, Proceedings of the Thirteenth INT Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation, Cordoba, 28 June-July 4 1992, 295.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63484-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tipler, F.J. (1974) Physical Review D, 9, 2203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.9.2203</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63484-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morris, M.S. and Thorne, K.S. (1988) American Journal of Physics, 56, 395-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.15620</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>