<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EPE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Energy and Power Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1949-243X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/epe.2016.81001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">EPE-63269</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Research on the Deformation of Turbine Blades at Machining
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>asu</surname><given-names>Yamada</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Keiji</surname><given-names>Sonoya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Takahito</surname><given-names>Sobayashi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hiroshi</surname><given-names>Satoh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Nichia Tanko Co. Ltd., Tomioka, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mechanical Systems, Yamanashi University, Kofu, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>TBM Corporation, Nagano, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Oridea Inc., Mishima, Japan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>01</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>12</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>26</month>	<year>January</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Along with the recent expansion of demand for electricity, the production of steam turbine blades has increased, and various materials forged of 12Cr ferritic heat-resistant types of steel have become widely used for this purpose. Although this material seems to be an excellent choice as heat-resistant steel, it requires a post-correction process for deformation after machining and thus lowers productivity. Therefore, we started basic experimental research, and through a series of tests, we found that 12Cr steel is a sticky material; the residual stresses after machining concentrate in the vicinity of the surface; and this influences the deformation of blades.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Turbine Blade</kwd><kwd> Machining</kwd><kwd> Deformation</kwd><kwd> 12Cr Steel</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The production of steam turbine blades continues to increase along with the recent expansion of demand for electricity. As electric plants seek larger capacity and increased efficiency, the recent trend is to produce larger turbine blades that demand dimensional control with high accuracy. The materials typically used for turbine blades are chrome alloy steel, nickel alloy steel, and titanium, as well as austenitic stainless steel for special environments and 17-4PH steel with high strength. The contents of the additives vary slightly among turbine manufacturers. One material among them, the forged material 12Cr steel, which is a ferritic heat-resistant steel, began to be used as a turbine blades material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63269-ref1">1</xref>] . Although considerable time has passed since the development of the fundamental technological background, there are a lot of complaints when this material is seen from the standpoints of forging suppliers and machining workers, who report that “care must be taken in the heat-treatment of removing stress after forging”, and “there is unexplained transforming behavior at machining”. Moreover, although there is some research on creep strength, etc., for this material as heat-resistant steel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63269-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63269-ref3">3</xref>] , there is little research on its characteristics upon machining. In terms of the amount of deformation at machining of the turbine blades, foregoing research does not exist at all.</p><p>Considering this current situation, we started research on the engineering issue: how can this machining deformation be brought as close as possible to zero? In a series of experimental research projects, first, we examined the cutting resistance and investigated how it is influenced by the number of teeth and the depth of the cut made by the tool [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63269-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63269-ref5">5</xref>] . Next, we tried to acquire basic data that tend to be lacking, such as the tensile and compression test, and investigated the work-affected layers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63269-ref6">6</xref>] . Consequentially, their thicknesses were obtained by the hardness method, and it was calculated that the values were larger than the ones seen in the reference. Moreover, we have not come to an understanding of the situation of the metallographic structure and residual stress.</p><p>As a result, we found that 12Cr steel is a sticky material; the residual stresses after machining concentrate in the neighborhood of the surface; and this influences the deformation of blades.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experiments and Measurements</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Material Properties and Blades Deformation State</title><p>Although it depends on the product shape after machining, these forged materials are delivered from turbine manufacturers via forging suppliers to us, as the fabricator, in the state of cutting stock of about 4 mm thickness remaining on both sides to be finished with two rounds of machining.</p><p>The machining is done using simultaneous NC milling for such materials, and the deformation correction of a deformed blade, which is discussed in this paper, is done using a press machine as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b), respectively. Here, in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a), when the amount of the deformation during machining increases, it is likely to end only in a rising vibration value or in an abnormal warning in the index table, or both at the same time. In this case, a worker is forced to do corrective work using a press, shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b). There is a loss of productivity because this work must rely on the worker’s intuition and experience.</p><p>When restraint of the work materials on the milling bed during machining is relieved, and after supporting the root part of the blades that are the working reference of the machined blades and other parts are freed, the run-outs of the blade center have no fixed form, as well as magnitudes and directions. One sample in which all blades are distorted in the direction of the back is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. This figure was obtained through data on blades for a 700 MW electric generating plant, 400 mm in length for 45 blades after finishing, and it is known that large deformations close to 1.5 mm developed for the tolerance of 0.2 mm. In the age of NC versatile</p><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Cutting by simultaneous NC milling (a) and the stage of correcting deformation with a press (b).</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x6.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x7.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>machines, although the introduction of improved cutting methods have been anticipated some time, the fact is that, without this solution, most concerns have been concentrated on the corrective method.</p><p>As a sample of the chemical composition of 12Cr steel that contains 10% - 12% Cr, shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, besides Cr, a small amount of Mo, W or V, and Nb, based on Fe, are added. These chemical compositions differ among turbine makers, and the hardness is also different, from an upper value of H<sub>V</sub> 380 to a lower value of H<sub>V</sub> 210. This creates the difficulty of maintaining accuracy in machining.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Cutting Test Using a Strip-Shaped Test Piece</title><p>First, we decided to investigate the amount of deformation in machining using a small, rectangular, strip-shaped test piece (TP) in this experiment. Then, after trying out various dimensions of rectangular plates, plates of 200 mm in length, 50 mm in width, and 10 mm thick were made of the same material as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, and their direction was matched, rolling to the long sides. We selected this size using the following considerations: ease of treatment, and the dimensions are near the dimensional ratio of actual blade parts. In the cutting experiment, we tried to align the long side (X-axis, 200 mm) of the TP with the feed direction of milling, and eliminate the effect of the short side (Y-axis, 50 mm) as much as possible. Therefore, after cutting to a prescribed length from a long piece of material with a section 120 mm square, we divided this into four segments longitudinally, and</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Example of blade transformation in milling</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x8.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical composition of tested 12% Cr steel</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="14"  >Chemical composition</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Si</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ti</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>divided one of them into four, and eventually obtained 16 strip-shaped TPs that can be secured as 10 mm thick, by using a hacksaw. These TPs were finished on both sides by machining and grinding on the test surface, and the surface roughness was finished to R<sub>a</sub> = 1.2 &#181;m.</p><p>In the experiment, after some trials, we executed the annealing to all TPs at 675˚C for one hour, the same conditions as with forged materials, and supplied it to the cutting tests. All tests were performed under the same conditions using a numerically controlled machining-center with a cutter diameter of 63 mm, with the cutting conditions of the cutting speed at 120 m/min., and feed rate 0.1 mm/edge. We assumed the depth of the cut and the number of cutting edges to be parameters to be machined, and the cutting fluid was dispersed during the machining process in the same way. The cutting resistance during machining was measured over the three directional elements of the X, Y, and Z axes at the same time with a fixed dynamometer from HK &amp; Co., type 9257B.</p><p>When we measured the dimensions before and after machining of the TPs, we used a three-dimensional measuring instrument. In this case, as the measuring points, the inside span of 160 mm from both ends by 20 mm along the X-axis were the measurement section. Nine points were assumed by equally dividing at the pitch of 20 mm, and five points were taken at the pitch of 10 mm along the Y-axis, leaving 5 mm at both ends. Thus 45 points were measured in total. Furthermore, one of the 20 mm edges, regarded as the root part of the actual blades, was made the reference plane for the measurement.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Measurement of Deformation Stress</title><p>We felt there was insufficient data regarding tensile stresses and compression stresses for basic material data concerning 12Cr steel, and no information was found on the residual stresses in the work-affected layer, which is thought to contribute greatly to machining deformation. We thus decided to include these matters in our investigation.</p><p>First, tensile stress was tested using a JIS14 test piece made of the same material as the strip-shaped test piece using the Shimadzu AG-300kNXplus as the testing equipment. Next, for the compression test, we assumed 80 kN, which was 80% of the maximum capacity, as the target, because the limitation of the test equipment (Shimadzu AG-IS 100kN) is 100 kN. We decided the dimensions (diameter: d, height: h) of the test piece to be h = 1.5 d, referring to the document [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63269-ref7">7</xref>] . After the above preparation, we obtained a test piece 3 mm in diameter and 4.5 mm in height. In the test to see the diameter change in the columnar test piece, before adding the load, both edges’ surface roughness was finished to R<sub>a</sub> = 0.4 - 1.6 &#181;m, and a lubricant was spread between the TP and the vertical compression jig to avoid lateral side bulging of the TP. To transform it as if it were columnar, PTFE sheets of 0.1 mm thickness were inserted. In addition, we implemented a residual stress measurement on the surface of the strip-shaped TP after cutting had been done, using Rapid X-Ray Stress Analyzer PSPC-MSF by Rigaku Corp.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Investigation of Work-Affected Layer</title><p>We investigated the work-affected layer, which is one of the essential items in this paper, through both sides of thickness and metallographic structure by using the hardness method to measurement of the former, and electron beam backscatter diffraction (EBSD) for observation of the latter.</p><p>In the hardness method, in the example shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, the hardness of each 10 &#181;m was measured from the machined surface of the TP sequentially with the Vickers hardness meter, and the thickness of the work- affected layer after machining was examined by changing the depth of the cut from 0.25 to 1.0 mm in four stages. The point at which the fluctuation of hardness, which seemed to be a feature of 12Cr steel, disappeared and turned uniform was made at the boundary of the work-affected layer and the substratum of the material.</p><p>After having ground the fragment edge, which had been made by a wire cut about 10 mm square and 2 mm thick, we observed its crystalline texture whiles canning using electron microscopy (Carl Zeiss, ULTRA Plus) and got the EBSD pattern.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Test Outcomes and Reviews</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Cutting Resistance and Deformation State</title><p>In the investigation of cutting using strip-shaped TPs by changing the depth of the cut from 0.25 mm to 1.0 mm in four stages, we observed the cutting resistance, and obtained the data in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. The fact that the values of</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Change in Vicker’s hardness between the work affected layer and the substratum</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Relations between depth of the cut and component forces in each direction</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x10.png"/></fig><p>the Y-axis are small, about half compared to those of the X- and Z-axis, seems to be explained by the fact that the diameter of the cutter, 63 mm, is larger than the width of the TP, 50 mm, and there is little cutting participation in the direction of width.</p><p>The amount of deformation of the strip-shaped TP for the cutting conditions (cutting speed 120 m/min., feed rate 0.1 mm/edge) is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. When material that was annealed after machining was assumed to be ⓐ and the deformed shape after milling to be ⓑ, the net deformation was obtained by deriving ⓑ from ⓐ. Though this is a sample, almost all TPs showed the same tendency, and it has understood the deformation of machined side curve into concave in the direction of long side (in this experiment, five TPs of 200 mm length showed 40.6 &#181;m of maximum deflection near to the center) and convex in the direction of short side (similarly, 10.6 &#181;m for 50 mm width) as if a saddle. It is suggested, from above facts, to present a complex deformation, because the real turbine blades are the overall finished goods and also having three-dimensional torsion.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Measurement of Deforming Stress</title><p>1) Tensile stress: A stress-strain diagram obtained in the test is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. It is known from this</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Deformation measurement with 3-D measuring instruments for one of the test pieces</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Diagram of tensile stress-strain</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x12.png"/></fig><p>diagram that 12Cr steel does not show a plain yield point as a soft iron-like material, and looks like nonferrous metals, presenting a large load capacity. In maximum tensile stress, the differences in the values among three TPs are small, at 1006 MPa. From the inclination from the point that designates 0.2% of plastic strain to the maximum load point, it is proved that there is a relation between the true stress, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and the strain,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63269-formula38"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>2) Compression stress: The result of the compression stress test is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>. It may be said that on examination, the columnar TP did not bulge, and the influence of friction is hardly seen between the TP and the compression jig. As the maximum compression stress obtained, 1290 MPa, we arrived at an empirical relation between the stress, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and the strain,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63269-formula39"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>3) Residual stress: Measurements were obtained of the residual stress of the strip-shaped TP machined while changing the depth of the cut under the conditions (cutting speed 120 m/min., feed rate 0.1 mm/edge) in the work- affected layer. The depth for measurement, calculated from the profile measurement using the surface-roughness measuring instrument after shaving by adjusting the electrolytic grinding time, is based on values roughly converted numerically.</p><p>The results for residual stress obtained by changing the depth of the cut from 0.5 to 1.0 mm are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>. In both figures, it was understood that considerably large stresses remain concentrated within a shallow range in the vicinity of the machined surface.</p><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Diagram of compressive stress-strain</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x19.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Residual stress measured from the surface in direction of depth</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x20.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Thickness of the Affected Layer and Metallography</title><p>The thickness of the work-affected layer obtained by the hardness method, along with the predicted values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63269-ref8">8</xref>] , is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>. When the depth of the cut approaches 1.0 mm, the thickness of 12Cr steel has been known to exceed 400 &#181;m, and the predicted value approaches 300 &#181;m. The calculation method is described below.</p><p>Thinking about internal stress when the force of the cutting edge acts concentrically on the surface of a semi- infinite solid, and when there is an indexed relation of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> between a stress, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and a strain, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, a radial stress component, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63269-ref8">8</xref>] is related to cutting by turning; this stress component corresponds to, for our case with milling, a vertical component), is expressed by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63269-formula40"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the concentrated force, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the thickness of the work-affected layer, and according to the foregoing Section 3.2, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(=0.08) &lt; 1/2. In this case, we can assume the direction of the acting force angle for cutting<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is defined as follows:</p><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Thickness of the affected layer measured by hardness change and empirical relation</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x31.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.63269-formula41"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, from an equilibrium conditional expression, a vertical component, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, is a constant to be fixed, satisfying:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63269-formula42"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a constant decided by the angle between the force of the cutting edge and the work surface. By using all the equations above from (3) to (5), consequentially an equation that satisfies <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a yield stress), can be derived as (6).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63269-formula43"><label>. (6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When we calculate predictive values using Equation (6), the normal force that acts on the surface to be machined is already obtained from the load in the vertical (Z-axis) direction in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, and the yield stress <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> = 850 MPa, obtained from the 0.2% proof stress in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>, which seems to have high reliability compared to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, is to be substituted. The calculation result is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>, denoted as “Calculation”. A photograph taken after milling with a 3 mm depth of cut, obtained by EBSD, is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0. From this figure, the following can be read: the work-affected layer in this figure is made of a refined crystal of 1.5 &#181;m-level thickness right under the machined surface, and some plastic flow follows this.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Investigation of Chips</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Features of Chips</title><p>The chips obtained from a 12Cr stainless steel rod under cutting conditions (cutting speed 120 m/min., feed rate 0.1 mm, edge rake angle 16˚) was observed with a microscope to present a chip called flow type. The chips observed by changing the depth of the cut in four stages, from 0.25 to 1.0 mm, are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1. Consequentially, these chips are known to have flaked off after plastic deformations of the parent material, and remarkable shearing deformation is recognized regardless of the dimension of the depth of cut. From this fact, the hardness is expected to rise (the hardness of the chips is described in Section 4.3).</p><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Metallographic structure obtained by the electron backscatter diffraction method</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x42.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Conditions Obtained by Sudden Cut-Stop Method</title><p>A conspicuous symptom at the front of the edge is obtained by a sudden cut-stop method for the column of 12Cr steel under the same cutting conditions as in the previous section. An example of observations using a microscope, shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2, was taken from a wire-cut fragment. The boundary of the shearing deformation of chips and the plastic strain area of the substratum become like a circular arc; it is known that this material has strong stickiness. The pitch of the measuring point was too large, and thus it was not possible to look for the expected work-affected (hardened) layer.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Hardness of the Chips</title><p>Concerning the part of the chip shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2, although this is not separate from the parent metal, the color aspect is different from the parent metal, and a change in the metallographic structure is expected. The hardness, H<sub>V</sub>, of the chip part is high: impressions of the indenter of a Vickers hardness meter of 100 &#181;m are seen on the photo. Hardness rises roughly to H<sub>V</sub> = 415 - 440 by 40 to 50 percent, compared to that of the parent metal, which is H<sub>V</sub> = 290 - 300. On the other hand, the hardness of the chips cut off by milling never rises this high. Their median of hardness, H<sub>V</sub> = 330, is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, and is not more than 10 percent higher at most. This fact is thought to be due to the following. The stress generated by continuous lathe turning is larger than the stress of intermittent cutting of a multi-edge tool regarding the degree of work hardening.</p><fig id="fig11"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Microphotograph of chips obtained by changing the depth of cut</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x43.png"/></fig><fig id="fig12"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Aspect of the work piece near the blade edge made by the sudden cut-stop method</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x44.png"/></fig><fig id="fig13"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3</label><caption><title> Hardness of chips made by milling with a 1 mm depth of cut</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x45.png"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>We examined the machining characteristics of 12Cr steel from various viewpoints, and obtained the following findings:</p><p>1) In one-side machining by milling in which feed direction coincides with the long side, the machined surface deforms into concave shape on the long side and convex shape on the short side, and comes to resemble a saddle.</p><p>2) From tensile and compression tests using a rod-type test piece, the allowable tensile stress and the allowable compressive stress are 1000 MPa and 1200 MPa, and the relations<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, between the stress, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and the strain, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6201904x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, exist for the tensile and compressive terms, respectively.</p><p>3) The thickness of the work-affected layer obtained after milling on the strip-shaped TP increases with the depth of the cut, and the predicted value estimated from the literature approaches 300 &#181;m; that obtained from experiment using the hardness method exceeds 400 &#181;m.</p><p>4) Comparatively large stress remains in the surface neighborhood (100 &#181;m or less of the affected layer), and it is understood that these values increase as the depth of the cut decreases.</p><p>5) It is understood that the work-affected layer is made of a refined crystal of 1.5 &#181;m-level thickness right under the machined surface, and some plastic flow follows this.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to thank all those who contributed to our paper. They are S. Yonekubo, K. Kamijo, and Y. Nagasu of the Industrial Technology Center of Nagano Prefecture, for acquiring the test data; Y. Watanabe and I. Masuda, graduates of Yamanashi University, for executing the tests; and K. Hosoi of TBM Corp., for arranging the figures. Their assistance is much appreciated.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>MasuYamada,KeijiSonoya,TakahitoSobayashi,HiroshiSatoh, (2016) Research on the Deformation of Turbine Blades at Machining. Energy and Power Engineering,08,1-12. doi: 10.4236/epe.2016.81001</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.63269-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ohta, S. (1998) Ferritic Heat-Resisting Steels. Chijin, Shokan. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63269-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamada, M., Watanabe, O., Yoshioka, Y. and Miyazaki, M. (1990) Development of Advanced 12Cr Steel Rotor Forgings. ISIJ, 76, 1084-1091. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63269-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Uchida, H., Shinya, T. and Tsuchiya, T. (1996) Relationship between Creep Deformation Behavior and Structural Change in High Strength 12Cr Steel. ISIJ, 82, 249-254. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63269-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamada, M., Watanabe, Y., Fujinuma, R., Sonoya, K. and Satoh, H. (2014) Study on Optimal Machining of Turbine Blades. 2014 IEEE 8th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO), 24-25 March 2014, Langkawi Island, 641-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/peoco.2014.6814506</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63269-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamada, M., Watanabe, Y. and Sonoya, K. (2014) Experimental Research on the Deformation at Turbine Blades Cutting. The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, 31-32. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63269-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamada, M., Sonoya, K. and Sobayashi, T. (2015) Research on the Deformation at Turbine Blades Cutting. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Kanto Branch, No. 10504, 2 p. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63269-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">JSTP (2006) Handbook of Plastic Working. JSTP, Corona, 237. (In Japanese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63269-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okushima, K. and Itano, Y. (1968) Study on the Generating Process of Machined Surface. Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, 34, 971-978. (In Japanese) http://dx.doi.org/10.1299/kikai1938.34.971</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>