<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">APM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Pure Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-0368</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/apm.2016.61005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">APM-62902</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Inverse Spectral Theory for a Singular Sturm Liouville Operator with Coulomb Potential
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>tibar</surname><given-names>S. Panakhov</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ismail</surname><given-names>Ulusoy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Adiyaman University, Adiyaman, Turkey</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>epenahov@firat.edu.tr(TSP)</email>;<email>iulusoy@adiyaman.edu.tr(IU)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>01</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>41</fpage><lpage>49</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>21</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>18</month>	<year>January</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  We consider the inverse spectral problem for a singular Sturm-Liouville operator with Coulomb potential. In this paper, we give an asymptotic formula and some properties for this problem by using methods of Trubowitz and Poschel.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Coulomb Potential</kwd><kwd> Asymptotic Formula</kwd><kwd> Normalizing Eigenfunction</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The Sturm-Liouville equation is a second order linear ordinary differential equation of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula677"><label>(1.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for some <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It was first introduced in an 1837 publication [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref1">1</xref>] by the eminent French mathematicians Joseph Liouville and Jacques Charles Fran&#231;ois Sturm. The Sturm-Liouville Equation (1.1) can easily be reduced to form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula678"><label>(1.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If we assume that p(x) has a continuous first derivative, and p(x), r(x) have a continuous second derivative, then by means of the substitutions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula679"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where c is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula680"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (1.1) assumes the form (1.2) replaced by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula681"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The transformation of the general second order equation to canonical form and the asymptotic formulas for the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions was given by Liouville. A deep study of the distribution of the zeros of eigenfunctions was done by Sturm. Firstly, the formula for the distribution of the eigenvalues of the single dimensional Sturm operator defined in the whole of the straight-line axis with increasing potential in the infinity was given by Titchmarsh in 1946 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref3">3</xref>] . Titchmarsh also showed the distribution formula for the Schr&#246;dinger Operator. In later years, Levitan improved the Titchmarsh’s method and found important asymptotic formula for the eigenvalues of different differential operators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref5">5</xref>] . Sturm-Liouville problems with a singularity at zero have various versions. The best known case is the one studied by Amirov [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref7">7</xref>] , in which the potential has a Coulomb-type singularity</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula682"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>at the origin. In these works, properties of spectral characteristic were studied for Sturm-Liouville operators with Coulomb potential, which have discontinuity conditions inside a finite interval. Panakhov and Sat estimated nodal points and nodal lengths for the Sturm-Liouville operators with Coulomb potential [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref8">8</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref10">10</xref>] . Basand Metin defined a fractional singular Sturm-Liouville operator having Coulomb potential of type A/x [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Let’s give some fundamental physical properties of the Sturm-Liouville operator with Coulomb potential. Learning about the motion of electrons moving under the Coulomb potential is of significance in quantum theory. Solving these types of problems provides us with finding energy levels of not only hydrogen atom but</p><p>also single valance electron atoms such as sodium. For the Coulomb potential is given by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where r</p><p>is the radius of the nucleus, e is electronic charge. According to this, we use time-dependent Schr&#246;dinger equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula683"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the wave function, h is Planck’s constant and m is the mass of electron.</p><p>In this equation, if the Fourier transform is applied</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula684"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>it will convert to energy equation dependent on the situation as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula685"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, energy equation in the field with Coulomb potential becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula686"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If this hydrogen atom is substituted to other potential area, then energy equation becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula687"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If we make the necessary transformation, then we can get a Sturm-Liouville equation with Coulomb potential</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula688"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a parameter which corresponds to the energy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Our aim here is to find asymptotic formulas for singular Sturm-Liouville operat&#246;r with Coulomb potential with domain</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>~</p><p>Also, we give the normalizing eigenfunctions and spectral functions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Basic Properties</title><p>We consider the singular Sturm-Liouville problem</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula689"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let us denote by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the solution of (2.1) satisfying the initial condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula690"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the solution of same equation, satisfying the initial condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula691"><label>(2.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 1. The solution of problem (2.1) and (2.2) has the following form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula692"><label>(2.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies Equation (2.1), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula693"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Integrating the first integral on the right side by parts twice and taking the conditions (2.2) into account, we find that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula694"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is (2.4).</p><p>Lemma 2. The solution of problem (2.1) and (2.3) has the following form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula695"><label>(2.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. The proof is the same as that of Lemma 1.</p><p>Now we give some estimates of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which will be used later. For each fixed x in [0, 1] the map <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an entire function on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which is real-valued on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref13">13</xref>] . Using the estimate</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula696"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula697"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula698"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula699"><label>(2.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (2.6) the inequality is easily checked</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula700"><label>(2.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where c is uniform with respect to q on bounded sets in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Lemma 3 (Counting Lemma). [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref13">13</xref>] Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be an integer. Then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has exactly N roots, counted with multiplicities, in the open half plane</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula701"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and for each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, exactly one simple root in the egg shaped region</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula702"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>There are no other roots.</p><p>From this Lemma there exists an integer N such that for every <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> there is only one <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> eigenvalue in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Thus for every <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula703"><label>(2.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>can be chosen independent of q on bounded sets of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Following theorem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref13">13</xref>] shows that the eigenvalues <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the zeroes of the map <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and these zeroes are simple.</p><p>Theorem 1. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is Dirichlet eigenvalue of q in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula704"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In particular,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Thus, all roots of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are simple.</p><p>Proof. The proof is similar as that of ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref13">13</xref>] , P&#246;schel and Trubowitz).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Asymptotic Formula</title><p>We need the following lemma for proving the main result.</p><p>Lemma 4. For every f in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula705"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula706"><label>. (3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. Firstly, we shall prove the relation (3.1)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula707"><label>(3.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we get</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Since f is in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the last two integrals are equal to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula708"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x75.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So (3.3) is equivalent to</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Finally, we shall prove the relation (3.2)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula709"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This proves the lemma.</p><p>The main result of this article is the following theorem:</p><p>Theorem 2. For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof of the Main Theorem. Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> it must be<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Because <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a nontrivial solution of Equation (2.1) satisfying Dirichlet boundary conditions, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula710"><label>(3.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (2.7) someone gets the inequality</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula711"><label>(3.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (3.5) integral in the equation of (3.4) takes the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula712"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By using difference formulas for sine we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula713"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x86.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From Lemma 4 we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula714"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x87.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, by using this inequality (3.4) can be written in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula715"><label>(3.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (2.8) we conclude that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula716"><label>(3.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, (3.7) is equivalent to</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>So we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula717"><label>. (3.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x93.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (2.8) we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula718"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In this case, the theorem is proved.</p><p>From this theorem, the map</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula719"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x95.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>from q to its sequences of Dirichlet eigenvalues sends <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> into S. Later, we need this map to characterize spectra which is equivalent to determining the image of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Inverse Spectral Theory</title><p>To each eigenvalue we associate a unique eigenfunction <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> normalized by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula720"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let’s define the normalizing eigenfunction<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula721"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 5. For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula722"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x103.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This estimate holds uniformly on bounded subsets of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. By the basic estimate for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula723"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x108.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By using this estimate we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula724"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x109.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula725"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x110.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus we conclude that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula726"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x111.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Dividing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we get</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Also, we need to have asymptotic estimates of the squares of the eigenfunctions and products</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula727"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x115.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 6. For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula728"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x117.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This estimate holds uniformly on bounded subsets of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. We know that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula729"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x119.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By the basic estimate for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula730"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x121.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hence,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula731"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x122.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The map <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is real analytic on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Now we give asymptotic behavior for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Theorem 3. Each <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a compact, real analytic function on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula732"><label>(4.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x129.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Its gradient is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula733"><label>(4.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x130.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The error terms are uniform on bounded subsets of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. From [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref14">14</xref>] we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula734"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x132.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So we calculate the integral</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula735"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x133.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Finally, since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula736"><label>(4.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x135.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we prove the theorem.</p><p>Let</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula737"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x136.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Formula (4.3) shows that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> belongs to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. By Theorem 3, the map</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula738"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x139.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>from q to its sequences of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-values maps <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> into the<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. So we obtain a map</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62902-formula739"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x143.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> into the<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Theorem 4. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref13">13</xref>] <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is one-to-one on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the Frechet derivative of the map <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x149.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at q.</p><p>Theorem 5. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62902-ref14">14</xref>] <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is an isomorphism from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> onto<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-5300984x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Etibar S.Panakhov,IsmailUlusoy, (2016) Inverse Spectral Theory for a Singular Sturm Liouville Operator with Coulomb Potential. Advances in Pure Mathematics,06,41-49. doi: 10.4236/apm.2016.61005</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.62902-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sturm, C. and Liouville, J. (1837) Extrait d.un m emoire sur le d eveloppement des fonctions en series dont les di erents terms sont assujettis a satisfaire a une m eme equation di er entielle lin eaire, contenant un param etre variable. Journal de Math ematiques Pures et Appliqu ees. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 2, 220-233.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62902-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Birkhoff, G.D. (1908) Boundary Value and Expansion Problems of Ordinary Linear Differential Equations. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 9, 219-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1908-1500810-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62902-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Titchmarsh, E.C. (1946) Eigenfunction Expansions Associated with Second-Order Differential Equations. Vol. 1, Clarendon Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62902-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Titchmarsh, E.C. (1958) Eigenfunction Expansions Associated with Second-Order Differential Equations. Vol. 2, Clarendon Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62902-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Levitan, B.M. (1978) On the Determination of the Sturm-Liouville Operator from One and Two Spectra. Mathematics of the USSR Izvestija, 12, 179-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1070/IM1978v012n01ABEH001844</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62902-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amirov, R.Kh. (1985) Inverse Problem for the Sturm-Liouville Equation with Coulomb Singularity Its Spectra. Kand. Dissertasiya, Baku.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62902-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Topsakal, N. and Amirov, R. (2010) Inverse Problem for Sturm-Liouville Operators with Coulomb Potential Which Have Discontinuity Conditions inside an Interval. Mathematical Physics, Analysis and Geometry, 13, 29-46.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11040-009-9066-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62902-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sat, M. and Panakhov, E.S. (2012) Inverse Nodal Problem for Sturm-Liouville Operators with Coulomb Potential. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 80, 173-180.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62902-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sat, M. and Panakhov, E.S. (2013) Reconstruction of Potential Function for Sturm-Liouville Operator with Coulomb Potential. Boundary Value Problems, 2013, Article 49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62902-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sat, M. (2014) Half Inverse Problem for the Sturm-Liouville Operator with Coulomb Potential. Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences, 8, 501-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/amis/080207</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62902-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bas, E. and Metin, F. (2013) Fractional Singular Sturm-Liouville Operator for Coulomb Potential. Advances in Difference Equations, Article ID: 300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-300</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62902-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blohincev, D.I. (1949) Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. GITTL, Moscow.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62902-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poeschel, J. and Trubowitz, E. (1987) Inverse Spectral Theory. Academic Press, San Diego.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62902-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guillot, J.-C. and Ralston, J.V. (1988) Inverse Spectral Theory for a Singular Sturm-Liouville Operat&amp;#246;r on [0,1]. Journal of Differential Equations, 76, 353-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(88)90080-0</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>