All amino acids, L-valine (L-Val), L-leucine (L-Leu), L-isoleucine (L-Ile) used in this study were pharmaceutical grade and were purchased from Ajinomoto Co. Ltd. As Cu(II) cation source, copper acetate, Cu(OAc)₂∙H₂O (CuOAc, Wako Chemical Co.) was used. These materials were used without purification.

One of BCAAs (L-Val, L-Leu, L-Ile, 0.5 mmol) was dissolved in distilled water (20 ml). To the solution was added 0.25 mmol of CuOAC as solid followed by dissolution of CuOAC to form homogeneous solution. Complex formation was occurred in the homogeneous system and changes in the solution state was observed by naked eye. In this experimental, pH of the solution was not controlled and the solution was allowed for stand at 298 K. If the precipitation was occurred by only the mixing, resultant crystals were filtered and its structure was analyzed. In case of no precipitation, the solvent water was evaporated and crystallization was forced to occur. Structure of the formed crystals were determined by measuring powder XRD using RigakuRINT 2200 (CuKα: λ = 1.5406 Å). Structure of the obtained crystals were estimated by comparing the calculated patters simulated using published crystallographic data [3] -[5] .

Addition and dissolution of solid CuOAc in L-Val aqueous solution caused only solution color change from colorless to blue transparent. No precipitation was confirmed at the given condition as shown in Figure 2(a). In this liquid, Cu(II)(L-Val)₂ complex must be formed in the liquid phase, however, the concentration of the product complex must be lower than saturated concentration, leading to no assembly of the complex molecules. Interestingly, whenthe copper was mixed with L-Leu aqueous solution, immediate precipitation of blueish powders was occurred (Figure 2(b)) and the remained solution color was changed to colorless. In case of L-Ile (Figure 2(c)), almost the same results with the case of Cu(II)-L-Val system were observed. As mentioned above, no precipitants were obtained for Cu(II)-L-Val and Cu(II)-L-Ile at a given experimental conditions just by mixing, thus the solvent water were evaporated to obtain reactant products in solid state for confirmation of structures of the reactant products by powder XRD measurements and the results are discussed later in Section 3.3.

Before examine the structures of the product crystals described in Section 3.1, let’s see Cu(II)(BCAA)₂ crystal structures using reference data [3] -[5] . Cu(II)(L-Val)₂ complexes form two crystal structures depending on the

crystallization conditions. One is hydrated form of cis-aquabis(L-valinato)copper(II), Cu(II)(L-Val)₂∙H₂O, and the other is trans-bis(L-valinato)copper(II), Cu(II)(L-Val)₂. As shown in Figure 3(a), the Cu(II) ion is pentacoordinated with two carbonyl oxygen, two amino nitrogen atoms and a hydrated water oxygen atom in cis- Cu(II)(L-Val)₂∙H₂O molecule. In contrast, trans-Cu(II)(L-Val)₂ (Figure 3(b)), forms hexacoodinated complex, in which the Cu(II) cation is coordinated with two carbonyl oxygen atoms, two amino nitrogen atoms and two carbonyl oxygen atoms of neighboring trans-Cu(II)(L-Val)₂ molecules.

For Cu(II) complex with L-Leu, only trans-isomer, trans-bis(L-leucinato)copper(II) (Cu(II)(L-Leu)₂) as shown in Figure 3(c) is reported [4] . For L-Ile, both cis- and trans-isomers, cis-aquabis(L-isoleucinato)copper(II), (Cu(II)(L-Ile)₂∙H₂O) and trans-aquabis(L-isoleucinato)copper(II) (Cu(II)(L-Ile)₂∙H₂O) are known to exist, however, crystal structure of only cis-isomer (Figure 3(d)) was reported [5] . From Figure 3 it can be understand, cis-isomers are hydrated and form pentacoordination structures, while trans-isomers are water-free and form hexacoodination structures.

Packing motif of these molecules in crystals are shown in Figure 4. In cis-Cu(II)(L-Val)₂∙H₂O and trans- Cu(II)(L-Val)₂ complexes, Figure 4(a) and Figure 4(b), both of the two crystal structures have hydrophobic and hydrophilic double layers. Difference between them can be seen in intermolecular interactions. In cis-Cu(II)(L- Val)₂∙H₂O, only intermolecular hydrogen bond are formed between molecules as shown by dotted lines in Figure 4(a), while Cu-O coordination interaction are dominant intermolecular interaction in trans-isomer (Figure 4(b)). The same molecular interaction patterns are true for trans-Cu(II)(L-Leu)₂ (Figure 4(c)) and cis-Cu(II)(L- Ile)₂∙H₂O (Figure 4(d)) crystals. In either cases, cis-isomer forms hydrogen bonding, while trans-isomer forms coordination interaction. From these results, trans-isomer must be more stable than cis-isomer.

In Figure 5, measured and calculated patterns of powder XRD were shown for Cu(II)(L-Val)₂ (Figure 3(a)), Cu(II)(L-Leu)₂ (Figure 3(b)), Cu(II)(L-Ile)₂ (Figure 3(c)), respectively. In either cases, observed XRD patterns are shown in blue lines, while red and green lines show calculated patterns using reported crystallographic data.

For Cu(II)(L-Val)₂ complex crystals, two crystal structures with cis- and trans-isomers respectively were reported. By comparing the measure XRD of the precipitant (blue line in Figure 5(a)) with the calculated value of cis- and trans-isomers (red and green lines, respectively), the measured blue line is almost agreed with cis-iso- mer. This means cis-isomer was mainly precipitated. Small peaks at around 7 is appeared which has the same peak of green (trans) line. This means small amount of trans-isomer was included in the cis-complex. This is not surprising results when looking at Figure 6. Figure 6 shows crystal structure of hydrated cis-Cu(II)(L- Val)₂∙H₂O crystal viewing along <011> direction. For clarity, hydrated water oxygen atoms are shown by big red ball. Hydrophilic channels are formed in the crystal and water molecules are sandwiched among them. Since the water molecules are fixed with the L-Valine hydrophilic wall just by weak hydrogen bond. It can be expected the sandwiched water molecules are able to be released through the channel with the elevation of temperature even lower than water boiling temperature. In our crystallization experiment, hydrated cis-complex crystals were obtained, however, the water molecule must be released when the sampled crystals were allowed to in contact with open air. In case of L-Leuas ligand (Figure 5(b)), the measure XRD pattern is agreed with trans isomer (red line), while L-Ile was precipitated as cis-form.

Now, it may be concluded that only Cu(II)(L-Leu)₂ was precipitated as stable trans-form, while the others were formed metastable cis-forms. Why only L-Leu favor the trans-isomer. This is very interesting results because the three BCAAs used as ligands have similar molecular structures. Our guess for these results are as follows: Metastable cis-forms are kinetic products, while the stable trans-forms are thermodynamic products. In Cu(II)(BCAA)₂ crystals formation, the metastable forms must appear first, then the metastable forms transform into stable forms. In this transformation process, side chain effect of the BCAAs must appear.