<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4077</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmmce.2016.41003</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE-62815</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Suitability of Some Selected Clay Deposit from Edo, Ogun, Ondo and Ekiti State of Nigeria for Ceramic Water Filters Production
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>mart</surname><given-names>Adeleye Olubayode</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Olufiropo</surname><given-names>Samson Awokola</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Enoch</surname><given-names>Olugbenga Dare</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Olubayo</surname><given-names>Timothy Olateju</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Civil Engineering, University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Chemistry, University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>s.olubayode@yahoo.com(MAO)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>01</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>26</fpage><lpage>32</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>15</month>	<year>January</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This study is designed to investigate the suitability of selected Nigeria clay deposit for clay based ceramic water filters (CWFs). Clay samples were taken from five randomly selected locations in Nigeria Namely: Okpella (Edo
  <sup>1</sup>) and Ojirami (Edo
  <sup>2</sup>) in Edo; Ikere in Ekiti state; FUTA in Ondo state and Onibode in Ogun to determine their suitability for clay based ceramic water filters (CWFs). Experimental analysis for linear shrinkage, water absorption, bulk density, compressive strength X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) was carried out on each of the clay samples. Test results reveal that all the clays contain high contents of alumina (Al
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>) and silica (SiO
  <sub>2</sub>) with minor contents of P
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>5</sub>, Fe
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>, MgO, K
  <sub>2</sub>O, MnO and TiO
  <sub>2</sub>. The average crystal sizes of the clay were between 15 and 27 nm. Lattice structure indicates that the sample is Monoclinic and Anorthic. Ceramic water filters (CWFs) were made from a mixture of clay and sawdust at different volume ratios, and processed into test samples. Water absorption, linear shrinkage and compressive strength of the clay based ceramic filters (CWFs), reveal that as the volume ratio of sawdust increases these properties decrease. Flow rate analysis indicates that Edo and Ekiti ceramic water filters (CWFs) have higher flow rates. The research indicates that Edo and Ekiti Clay with specification of some industrial clays shows that the samples can be recommended for use in clay based ceramic water filters production.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Ceramic Water Filters</kwd><kwd> X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)</kwd><kwd> X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF)</kwd><kwd> Clay</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The complex nature of clay makes its study and findings an ever fresh area of interest especially to the world of science. Clay and its minerals have played major roles in anthropogenic activities. The low cost of clay and its relative abundance in nature, high sorptive/electric charge properties, plus ion exchange ability and compatibility with several materials, give it a wide range of application [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62815-ref1">1</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62815-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>The basic rocks from which clays are formed are complex alumina silicates that exist in various proportions and contain varied amounts of impurities of iron, organic matters and residual minerals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62815-ref3">3</xref>] , during the weathering these become hydrolysed and the alkali and alkaline earth ions form soluble salts and are leached out. The remainder consists of hydrated alumina silicates of varying composition and structure, and free silica. It is the orientation of this predominantly silica structure that gives clay its unique plastic property.</p><p>Clay based ceramic water filters (CWFs) are usually produced by mixing of clay, sawdust (woodchips) and water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62815-ref4">4</xref>] . Although porous CWFs have been used successfully in the field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62815-ref4">4</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62815-ref7">7</xref>] for over a decade, the suitability and utilization of the vast Nigeria clay deposit cannot be over emphasized. Thus, the present study is designed to investigate the suitability of selected Nigeria clay deposit from Edo, Ogun and Ekiti States for clay based ceramic water filters (CWFs).</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sample Preparation</title><p>The samples were taken from five randomly selected locations in Nigeria Namely: Okpella (Edo<sup>1</sup>) and Ojirami (Edo<sup>2</sup>) in Edo; Ikere in Ekiti state; FUTA in Ondo state and Onibode in Ogun.</p><p>The collected samples were dried in open air, after which, the samples were manually crushed into thin particles using a mortar and pestle, and then levitated using the water extraction method. The clay samples were mixed with distilled water and thoroughly stirred and allowed to hydrate for several hours and latter decanted this process is repeated until purer clay is obtained. The samples were sun dried and subsequently dried in a laboratory oven at 110˚C for 24 hours. The resulting dried clay samples were pulverized and sieve with a digital octagon sieve shaker BS/ISO 3310 to an average particle size of 150 &#181;m, and label as processed clay (PC), and sent for analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Clay Based Ceramic Filters Formation</title><p>The clay samples were mixed with sawdust in five (5) different ratios into homogenous paste using an electronic mill, with water as the binding agent. The resulting mixture (clay, sawdust and water) was form into 3 geo- metrical shapes; cylindrical, flat and cubes slabs; it was there after dried in an oven (temperature of 105˚C, humidity of 40%) for 24 hours. After drying, the samples were sintered in a muffle furnace. The firing involved pre-heating of the sample to 450˚C - 500˚C (to burn off the sawdust), followed by heating to the sintering temperature of 850˚C for six hours in the same muffle furnace.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Materials Characterization</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Determination of Linear Shrinkage</title><p>Clay sample were made into flat bars of 12 cm &#215; 3 cm &#215; 1 cm was dried at room temperature for 14 days, after which the final length was measured. Total percentage shrinkage was determined using the formula;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62815-formula309"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2710389x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Water Absorption</title><p>Flat bar of clay samples were first weighed using an electronic weighing balance, soaked in a bowl of water for 24 hours. Each was then removed from water, allowed to drip and the remaining was gently wiped to ensure that no water was attached to the surface and was re-weighed again. The difference in weight was then used in computing the percentage water absorption applying the formula below:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62815-formula310"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2710389x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_3_3"><title>2.3.3. Compressive Strength</title><p>The compressive strength was determined using the Instron Universal Tester Model No: 3069, with a compressive load rate of 70 N/min.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_4"><title>2.3.4. Elemental Characterization.</title><p>The quantitative analysis of chemical components of both processed and unprocessed clay was done using EDX 3600B Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) spectrometer.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_5"><title>2.3.5. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis</title><p>The X-ray diffraction (XRD) was monitored using X-ray diffractometer GBC EMMA, CuKα radiation using an acceleration voltage of 25 kV and current of 400 &#181;A. The diffraction angle was scanned from 10˚ to 65˚ 2θ, at a rate of 4.00˚/min.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_6"><title>2.3.6. Flow Rate Analysis</title><p>Prior to the water flow experiments, the CWFs were saturated by complete submersion in a vat containing distilled water. The ceramic pot was first placed into a plastic receptacle that was fitted with a large plastic funnel. The filter and receptacle-funnel were suspended above an empty collection bucket. A known volume of distilled water was poured into the CWF, and the volume of the water that flowed into the collection bucket was measured. The flow rates were obtained by measuring the volume of water discharged from the CWFs as a function of time.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result and Discussions</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis</title><p>X-Ray Diffraction Analysis the clay samples are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, while the average crystal size and lattice structure parameter are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>Mineralogical compositions as determined by X-ray diffraction in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, shows that kaolinite Al<sub>2</sub>Si<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>(OH)<sub>4</sub>, as the predominant mineral content in all samples Other mineral constituents detected include</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> X-Ray diffraction of selected clays (a) Edo<sup>1</sup>, (b) Edo<sup>2</sup>, (c) Ondo, (d) Ogun, (e) Ekiti</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2710389x9.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Average crystal size and lattice structure parameter of clay XRD</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Property</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Edo<sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ekiti</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Edo<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ondo</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ogun</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average Crystal Size (nm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lattice Structure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monoclinic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monoclinic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monoclinic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anorthic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anorthic</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>free silica or quartz (SiO<sub>2</sub>), illite {KAl<sub>2</sub> (Si<sub>3</sub>,Al)O<sub>10</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>}, The major non-clay mineral constituent in these samples were quartz. The percentage composition of quartz ranges from 9% to 21%. Feldspar’s {(K,Na)AlSi<sub>3</sub>O<sub>8</sub>}, composition in sample d, was however lower than that of other clays used in the research. According to Brown et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62815-ref6">6</xref>] feldspars are the most abundant mineral group found in Earth’s crust. Albite (NaAlSi<sub>3</sub>O<sub>8</sub>) anchors the two main feldspar compositional series: the alkali feldspars (Na,K) AlSi<sub>3</sub>O<sub>8</sub> and the plagioclase series (Na,Ca)Al(Si,Al)Si<sub>2</sub>O<sub>8</sub>.</p><p>Generally, the XRD result revealed a high degree of crystalinity in all the samples. Careful investigation has reveals that all samples were composed essentially of SiO<sub>2</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, and to very limited extent of K<sub>2</sub>O and Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. Some other oxides were also present but in very negligible proportions. All the samples showed Kaolinite Al<sub>2</sub>Si<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>(OH)<sub>4</sub> as the predominant mineral content with main reflections of silicon oxide and kaolinite.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Chemical Analysis</title><p>The X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) results showed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> indicated that all the clays except Ekiti were siliceous in nature, having the highest number of silica present. Also the presence of Aluminum oxide of the order of between 34% - 45% makes them to fall under the class of Alumino-Silicate refractories [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62815-ref8">8</xref>] . These values are comparable to those obtained for residual and secondary clays from other parts of Nigeria. The presence of iron in the clay samples is clearly observed although in various amounts; this has been supported by various researchers as a rule rather than exception [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62815-ref9">9</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62815-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Physical Parameters of Raw and Blended Clay</title><p>The ratio of clay-sawdust are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, while <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows test result of Bulk density, linear shrinkage, water absorption and compressive strength of both raw and blended clay.</p><p>Water absorption and Liner shrinkage results shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>; indicate that as the volume ratio of sawdust increases the water absorption of blended clay increases, this might be due to the porosity of the ceramic filter with the addition of sawdust which is hydrophilic in nature. Ondo clay has the highest water absorption followed by Ogun, while Edo<sup>2</sup> recorded the lowest water absorption rate.</p><p>Linear shrinkage shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> indicates that clay from Ogun has the lowest shrinkage, while Ekiti clay recorded has the highest shrinkage value.</p><p>Compressive strength result are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, were it was seen to decrease linearly (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.8869) with increasing porosity caused by the addition of different volume ratio of sawdust. Clay samples from Edo<sup>2</sup> shows superior strength compare to other clay sample used for this research.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Elemental characteristics of clay sample</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Locations</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SO<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Others</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Edo<sup>1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.392</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.683</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.403</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.246</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.271</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.056</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.939</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.819</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ekiti</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.661</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.321</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.053</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.501</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Edo<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.436</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.338</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.184</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.451</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.284</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.472</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.649</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ondo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.303</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.074</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.578</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.582</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.586</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.650</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ogun</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.604</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.341</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.184</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.067</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.466</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.061</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.610</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Volume ratio of clay-sawdust from different location</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Locations</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Clay: Sawdust (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Edo<sup>1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ekiti</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Edo<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ogun</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ondo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100:0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>1</sup>(a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ek (a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>2</sup> (a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Og (a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Od (a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70:30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>1</sup>(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ek (b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>2</sup> (b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Og (b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Od (b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65:35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>1</sup>(c)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ek (c)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>2</sup> (c)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Og (c)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Od (c)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55:45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>1</sup>(d)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ek (d)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>2</sup> (d)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Og (d)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Od (d)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50:50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>1</sup>(e)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ek (e)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>2</sup> (e)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Og (e)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Od (e)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40:60</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of water absorption with sawdust volume ratio</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2710389x10.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of liner shrinkage with sawdust volume ratio</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2710389x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of compressive strength with sawdust volume ratio</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2710389x12.png"/></fig><p>From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, it was observed that, the flow rate of the clays samples increase as sawdust volume fraction increase, with clay from Lagos having the highest flow rate. However clay from Ogun has the lowest flow rate of 0.087 liters per hour.</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of flow rate with sawdust volume ratio</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2710389x13.png"/></fig><table-wrap-group id="4"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Physical parameters of blended clay</title></caption><table-wrap id="4_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Locations</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Edo<sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>1</sup>(a)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>1</sup>(b)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>1</sup>(c)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>1</sup>(d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>1</sup>(e)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water Absorption (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liner Shrinkage (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flow rate (L/hr)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.045</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.076</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Compressive strength (Mpa)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.32</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Locations</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Edo<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>2</sup>(a)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>2</sup>(b)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>2</sup>(c)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>2</sup>(d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ed<sup>2</sup>(e)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water Absorption (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liner Shrinkage (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flow rate (L/hr)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.071</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.084</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.091</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.098</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Compressive strength (Mpa)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.11</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_3"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Locations</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ondo</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Od(a)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Od(b)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Od(c)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Od(d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Od(e)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water Absorption (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liner Shrinkage (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flow rate (L/hr)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.078</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.089</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.098</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Compressive strength (Mpa)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_4"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Locations</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ekiti</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ek(a)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ek(b)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ek(c)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ek(d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ek(e)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water Absorption (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liner Shrinkage (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flow rate (L/hr)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Compressive strength (Mpa)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_5"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Locations</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ogun</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Og(a)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Og(b)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Og(c)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Og(d)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Og(e)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water Absorption (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liner Shrinkage (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flow rate (L/hr)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.062</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.076</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Compressive strength (Mpa)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.76</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Selected Nigeria clay deposit from Edo, Ogun and Ekiti states for clay based ceramic water filters (CWFs) has been characterized. Results obtained suggest that the sample contains high contents of alumina (Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) and silica (SiO<sub>2</sub>) with minor contents of P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, MgO, K<sub>2</sub>O, MnO and TiO<sub>2</sub>. Water absorption, linear shrinkage and compressive strength of the clay based ceramic filters reveal that as the volume ratio of sawdust increases these properties decrease. Flow rate indicates that Ondo and Ekiti blended clays have higher flow rates, while Ogun clay has poor flow rate. A comparison of all clay used in the research indicates that Ondo and Ekiti clay with specification of some industrial clays shows that the samples can be recommended for use in ceramic filter production</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The contributions and assistance of the Managing Director EMDI, Engr (Dr.) Olusunle, and staff of EMDI especially, Mr. Patrick Ehi Imoisili, Miss Theresa Ezenwafor, Mr. Monday Eshiett and Mr. Femi Osho are greatly appreciated.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Smart AdeleyeOlubayode,Olufiropo SamsonAwokola,Enoch OlugbengaDare,Olubayo TimothyOlateju,11, (2016) Suitability of Some Selected Clay Deposit from Edo, Ogun, Ondo and Ekiti State of Nigeria for Ceramic Water Filters Production. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering,04,26-32. doi: 10.4236/jmmce.2016.41003</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.62815-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barbel, S. and Kurniawan, T.A. (2003) Low-Cost Adsorbents for Heavy Metals Uptake from Contaminated Water: A Review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 97, 219-243. &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00263-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62815-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Costanzo, P.M. (2001) Baseline Studies of The Clay Minerals Society Source Clays: Introduction. Clays and Clay Mineral, 49, 372-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2001.0490502</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62815-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akinfolarin, J.F. and Awopetu, O.O. (2014) The Effect of Sawdust on the Insulating Effect of Ikere Clay as Refractory Lining. AU Journal of .Technology, 17, 143-147.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62815-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oyanedel-Craver, V.A. and Smith, J.A. (2008) Sustainable Colloidal-Silver-Impregnated Ceramic Filter for Point-of-Use Water Treatment. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 42, 927-933. &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es071268u</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62815-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Albert, J., Luoto, J. and Levine, D. (2010) End-User Preferences for and Performance of Competing POU Water Treatment Technologies among the Rural Poor of Kenya. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 44, 4426-4432.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es1000566</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62815-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, J., Proum, S. and Sobsey, M.D. (2009) Sustained Use of a Household-Scale Water Filtration Device in Rural Cambodia. Journal of Water and Health, 7, 404-412. &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wh.2009.085</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62815-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lantagne, D., Klarman, M., Mayer, A., Preston, K., Napotnik, J. and Jellison, K. (2010) Effect of Production Variables on Microbiological Removal in Locally-Produced Ceramic Filters for Household Water Treatment. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 20, 171-187. &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09603120903440665</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62815-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Folorunso D.O., Olubambi, P. and Borode, J.O. (2014) Characterization and Qualitative Analysis of Some Nigerian Clay Deposits for Rafractory Applications. IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry, 7, 40-47.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.9790/5736-7914047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62815-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Badraoui, M. and Bloom, P.R.(1990) Iron-Rich High-Charge Beidellite in Vertisols and Mollisols of the High Chaouia Region of Morocco. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 54, 267-274.  
&lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400010043x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62815-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boiabid, R., Badraoui, M. and Bloom, P.R. (1991) Potassium Fixation and Charge Characteristics of Soil Clays. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 55, 1493-1498. &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500050049x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62815-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Badaut, D., Decarreau, A. and Besson, G. (1992) Ferripyrophyllite and Related Fe3+-Rich 2:1 Clays in Recent Deposits of Atlantis II Deep, Red Sea. Clay Minerals, 27, 227-244. &lt;br /&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1180/claymin.1992.027.2.07</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>