<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJNST</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-6795</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wjnst.2016.61002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJNST-62547</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Zero Flux Eigenvalues (ZFE’s) of Tight Aspect Ratio Tokamaks
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>herif</surname><given-names>Mohamed Khalil</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Noura</surname><given-names>Ali Alomayrah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>On Leave from Plasma Physics Department, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, Egypt</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculty of Science, Physics Department, Princess Nora Bint Abdurrahman University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>smkhalil@pnu.edu.sa(HMK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>01</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>15</fpage><lpage>22</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>29</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>3</month>	<year>January</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Compact toroidal magnetized plasmas are an important part of the world’s magnetic fusion and plasma science efforts. These devices can play an integral role in the development of magnetic fusion as a viable commercial energy source, and in our understanding of plasma instabilities, particle and energy transport, and magnetic field transport. In this paper, we are developing a numerical program to study the magnetic dynamo or relaxation of CT’s characterized by arbitrary tight aspect ratio (major to minor radii of tokamak) and arbitrary cross-sections (Multi-pinch and D-Shaped). The lowest ZFE’s has been calculated through the Taylor’s relaxed state (force-free) toroidal plasmas equation. For ZFE’s, we use the toroidal flux vanishing boundary condition along the whole boundary of tokamaks. Several runs of the program for various wave numbers showed that ZFE was very insensitive to the choice of wave numbers. Besides, the CT’s poloidal magnetic field topologies are well represented. It was very interesting to check our methods for the cases when aspect ratio tends to unity (zero tokamak whole). A good fulfillment of the boundary condition is achieved.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Relaxed Plasma State</kwd><kwd> Compact Tokamaks</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Compact toroidal magnetized plasmas became recently an important part of the world’s magnetic fusion and plasma science efforts. These devices can play an integral role in the development of magnetic fusion as a viable commercial energy source, and in our understanding of plasma instabilities, particle and energy transport, and magnetic field transport.</p><p>Compact toroid (CT) configuration is of simpler construction than the conventional tokamak and has important advantages due to the novel physics properties of its low aspect ratio. It could afford smaller, less-expensive fusion power plants, so it is becoming increasingly popular. There are several worldwide types of compact toroids as spheromaks: field reversed configuration (FRC), and other compact toroidal devices which had achieved remarkable successful results via fusion plasma parameters.</p><p>These devices can play an integral role in the development of magnetic fusion as a viable commercial energy source, and in our understanding of plasma instabilities, particle and energy transport, and magnetic field transport, but still there is a need to develop an experimental programs to study some of these phenomena with emphasis on transport, the relaxation state, non-classical ion acceleration and magnetic reconnection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>For reversed field pinch and spheromak configuration, magnetic helicity has been believed to play an important role as a global invariant in the process of self-organization and relaxation for magnetized plasma in CT. Accordingly, we have to go back to J. B. Taylor model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref4">4</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62547-formula112"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>to study and investigate the relaxed state (force-free) for compact to kamaks. The theory has been successfully applied to many fusion related plasmas, especially CT’s.</p><p>The steady state equilibrium of CT is characterized by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which represents the general form of Grad-Shafranov equation. Simply, an expression of the static pressure balances between gradient in kinetic pressure and magnetic forces.</p><p>Compact tori are typically characterized by low<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and accordingly simplest equilibrium model is given at vanishing the plasma gradient (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>), i.e., the current density J is completely parallel to the magnetic field b, and also vanishing of magnetic stress (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>). Accordingly the equilibrium equation reduces to Taylor’s relaxed state equation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62547-formula113"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (1) describes the relaxed toroidal plasmas to a force-free configuration of minimum energy. It was a representation of the convential Beltrami equilibrium, which also restricted to only force-free equilibrium.</p><p>If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is spatially uniform, then the curl of Equation (1) gives a vector Helmholtz equation, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref5">5</xref>] . The divergence of Equation (1) gives <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which means that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is constant on a field line. In relaxed states <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> cannot exceed the smallest eigenvalue <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and for a toroidal discharge, there is a maximum toroidal current <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which is connected to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>satisfies a zero flux boundary condition equation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62547-formula114"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which defines current limitation in tooidal systems.</p><p>Solutions of (1) are perceived to describe the gross features of FRC, spheromak configurations, current limitation in toroidal plasmas and others. Two parameters are determining the relaxed state for toroidal system with</p><p>a perfectly conducting boundary. Firstly, is the magnetic helicity <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and secondly is the</p><p>toroidal flux<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is an very important inverse length parameter. Eigenvalue <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the normalized field profile are determined by the dimensionless ratio <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>To select the correct minimum energy solution of Equations (1) and (2), one can consider the eigenvalues of this system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref7">7</xref>] . Solutions of Equations (1) and (2) seem to be difficult in toroidal coordinates. Therefore, the force-free magnetic field boundary value problem has been solved in the toroidal coordinates using approximate analytical methods, considering a large, but finite, aspect ratio [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref9">9</xref>] . Toroidal force-free equilibrium has also been considered precisely for tori of rectangular cross section and finite aspect ratio, and for more general boundaries in the infinite aspect ratio limit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>The aim of present work is to reply to the questions which may be arise about the applicability of collocation methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref10">10</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref14">14</xref>] to investigate and study the relaxed plasma state for tight aspect ratio tokamaks with multi- pinch and D-shaped boundaries.</p><p>We calculated the lowest eigenvalues<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which associated with relaxed force-free of the system. Furthermore, we proved the fulfillment of the boundary condition (2) along the whole boundary for different sharp edged cross-section. Dependence of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the aspect ratio is also studied. Besides, the magnetic field topologies inside the CT are represented.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Relaxed states analytical solutions for Axisymmetric CT</title><p>In order to determine the minimum eigenvalues, we apply to equations (1) and (2) a method of solving equations of this type―collocation method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref16">16</xref>] ―for a torus of arbitrary cross-sections and tight aspect ratios. In toroidal container and for finite aspect ratio the periodicity condition is expressed as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let us assume also, a variables separation as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>According to Taylor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref6">6</xref>] , <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>will satisfy different sorts of boundary conditions.</p><p>(i) The boundary condition (which is applied to all cases):<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it follows that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is constant if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (axi-symmetric tokamak).</p><p>(ii) The zero field condition: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>(iii) The zero flux condition: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref17">17</xref>] , which defines current limitation in tokamaks, and vanishing of azimuthal magnetic field.</p><p>For a non-axisymmetric mode the boundary condition (i) alone determine a zero-flux eigenvalue, the condition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is automatically ensure that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>For axisymmetric mode, the boundary condition (i) alone is not sufficient to determine an eigenvalue. The zero flux condition (iii) must be explicitly imposed to determine axisymmetric eigen-modes. The vanishing field condition (ii) is really an independent problem. It determines its own set of eigenvalues (the zero-field eigenvalues). The connection with the zero-flux problem arises because some (but not all) zero0field eigenvalues, defined by (ii), exactly coincide with some (but not all) zero-flux eigenvalues defined by (iii).</p><p>The meridional cross-section in the r, z plane of the toroidal metallic vessel wall shall be described by an arbitrary curve <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> along which the boundary condition (2) has to be satisfied. Later, the curve <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> will be represented by a set of points (collocation points) r, z which lay on the cross-section boundary.</p><p>From (1), the following expressions linking the magnetic field components are obtained:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62547-formula115"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As the toroidally non-axisymmetric states are not so evident in the experiments, we concentrate mainly on axisymmetric or <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> independent states.</p><p>Solution of Equations (3) gives the magnetic field components for axisymmetric toroidal plasmas as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62547-formula116"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.62547-formula117"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.62547-formula118"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are Bessel functions; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are Neumann functions; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are constant coefficients, and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>It should be mentioned here that, for the case of a straight cylinder (or for infinite aspect ratio of toroidal plasma), the coefficient <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> goes to zero, since the Neumann functions are singular for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. On the other hand, for finite aspect ratio or CT, as in our case, one has to keep these functions.</p><p>Inserting (5) into (2), the zero flux boundary condition for an axisymmetric container of finite aspect ratio and arbitrary cross-section reads [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref17">17</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62547-formula119"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x53.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Numerical Solution</title><p>Plasma is an inhomogeneous anisotropic nonlinear medium and modeling of plasma devices and the solutions of the associated mathematical problems are not a simple task. Many plasma machines are of toroidal geometry, hence their associated physical processes are described by partial differential equations with space dependent coefficients. Often these equations can not be separated in ordinary differential equations and one has to take refuge with numerical methods. The large computer CODES have been developed and worked quite well. However these codes showed disadvantages via small and compact tokamaks (characterized by great curvature or small aspect ratio). Should we arrive that a partial differential equations is not separable in a special coordinate system, then they will be solved in a coordinate system in which it is separable. This offers the great advantages that the boundary curves can be described by another coordinate systems or by a set of collocation points and that this description is absolutely independent of the coordinate system in which the partial differential equations is separable.</p><p>The collocation method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref11">11</xref>] may be applied to compact tori of Cassini (multi-pinch) and D-Shaped meridional cross-sections and arbitrary tight aspect ratio to calculate the lowest eigenvalue <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and to investigate the CT’s poloidal magnetic field topologies are well represented.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Cassini Cross-Section (Multi-Pinch Compact Device)</title><p>For tokamak with multi-pinch cross section, the meridional curve is given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.62547-formula120"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>in (7) may be expressed by (8). Numerically, for mode N = 4, and arbitrary aspect ratio<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the obtained results for zero flux eigenvalues μ against the aspect ratio α are given by <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>This shows that, by increasing aspect ratio α, the zero flux eigenvalue is slightly increases.</p><p>All our results have been calculated for a multi-pinch cross section given by the curve (8). This curve, along which the boundary condition is fulfilled, must also be described by the zero flux boundary condition (7). For C = 0, this gives the poloidal magnetic field lines along the container. Besides, for C has different values, this gives the poloidal magnetic flux lines inside the container. The toroidal shift (Shafranov’s shift) is clearly seen and depends on the aspect ratio, as per <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>The collocation points <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are marked by small black circles, and symmetrically distributed over the whole upper half of the cross-section.</p><p>Besides, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, shows the magnetic field components<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for CT with large and small elongation multi-pinch cross section.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. D-Shape Cross-Section</title><p>Let us consider now a tokamak with D-Shaped cross section with dimensions: R = 1.2, a = 0.6, α = R/a = 2, and collocation points given in table 2.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> zero flux eigenvalues μ against the aspect ratio α (μ vs α)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >20</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >α = R/a</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05064</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.04733</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.04409</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03967</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0338</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >μ</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> D-Shaped cross section with dimensions</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >1.80</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1.76</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1.48</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >r<sub>i</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >z<sub>i</sub></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Poloidal magnetic flux in multi-pinch cross-sections for arbitrary aspect ratio</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x62.png"/></fig><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The magnetic field components B<sub>r</sub> (r, z), B<sub>z</sub> (r, z) and B<sub>φ</sub> (r, z) for CT with large and small elongation multi-pinch cross section.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x65.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x64.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x63.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_4"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x68.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_5"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x67.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_6"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x66.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>For different arbitrary aspect ratio α, mode N = 4, and k-values (k = 4.3999, 3.42212, 2.44434, 1.46657), we obtained the zero flux eigenvalues as per table 3.</p><p>Applying the zero flux condition (7), for C = 0, and different values of C, we get the following poloidal magnetic field picture inside the D-shaped cross-sections for arbitrary aspect ratio (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>Besides, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, shows the magnetic field components<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for CT’s with aspect ratios (α = 3; α = 1.1).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussions and Conclusions</title><p>The paper presents a method for determining the ZFE’s of relaxed plasma states in compact tori of Multi-pinch and D-Shaped cross-sections.</p><p>If plasma is approximately force-free and approximately in equilibrium, then its magnetic field is determined by the simple force-free equation<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The behaviour of the solutions to this equation is determined by boundary conditions and by the internal <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> profile. CT’s like Spheromak is distinguished by its differing boundary conditions: spheromaks have azimuthally symmetry whereas prominences have mirror symmetry about a plane.</p><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, for both Multi-Pinch and D-shaped tokamaks, the aspect ratio α is found to play a crucial role in finding the ZFE’s, hence it strongly affects the physical picture of toroidal plasmas, specially when speaking about the current limitation in tokamaks. The lowest ZFE’s is obtained for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>It is also shown that the numerical method used here, works quite well for (CT) with tight aspect ratio (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). It gives, with high accuracy, the ZFE’s of the relaxed force-free equation. A good fulfilment of the boundary condition (7), which described the relaxed state along the whole boundary for different aspect ratios, is achieved even for aspect ratio approaches unity (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>).</p><p>The toroidal shift (Shafranov’s shift) is clearly seen and depends on the aspect ratio, as per <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>Recently, the problem studied in this paper, Taylor/Beltrami relaxation, is still finding a great interest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref16">16</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> the zero flux eigenvalues (μ vs α)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >20</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >10</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >α = R/a</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.58023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.57964</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.57714</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.55571</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.43098</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.40478</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >μ</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> the D-shaped cross-sections for arbitrary aspect ratio</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x76.png"/></fig><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> The magnetic field components B<sub>r</sub> (r, z), B<sub>z</sub> (r, z) and B<sub>φ</sub> (r, z) for CT’s with aspect ratios (α = 3; α =1.1).</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x77.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x78.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x79.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_4"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x80.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_5"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x81.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_6"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x82.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>Low aspect ratio plasmas in devices such as the mega ampere spherical tokamak (MAST) are characterized by strong toroidicity, strong shaping and self fields, low magnetic field, high beta, large plasma flow and high intrinsic E &#215; B flow shear. These characteristics have important effects on plasma behaviour, provide a stringent test of theories and scaling laws and offer new insight into underlying physical processes, often through the amplification of effects present in conventional tokamaks (e.g. impact of fuelling source and magnetic geometry on H-mode access) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62547-ref22">22</xref>] . Compared to higher aspect ratio α, low α leads to modest toroidal field and high plasma current in a small size which reduces weight and capital cost for the fusion power core.</p><p>Strong plasma shaping can lead to high steady state confinement and stable beta which ensure ignited burn capability in this plasma. Normal conducting toroidal field coils that dissipate power become acceptable under these conditions. High self-driven current reduces external current drive and recirculating power.</p><p>An interesting point is arised to consider in future the coupling magnetic and fluid aspects of plasma (i.e., for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1090263x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Sherif MohamedKhalil,Noura AliAlomayrah, (2016) Zero Flux Eigenvalues (ZFE’s) of Tight Aspect Ratio Tokamaks. World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology,06,15-22. doi: 10.4236/wjnst.2016.61002</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.62547-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joint Meeting of the 3rd IAEA Technical Meeting on Spherical Tori and the 11th International Workshop on Spherical Torus, 3-6 October 2005. http://www.apmath.spbu.ru/iaea/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NI Lecture: Fusion Energy: Can Smaller Be Better? Colin Windsor, Tokamak Energy, 2015. https://goo.gl/ZHZT6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taylor, J.B. (1974) Relaxation of Toroidal Plasma and Generation of Reverse Magnetic Fields. Physical Review Letters, 33, 1139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1139</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taylor, J.B. (1986) Relaxation and Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas. Reviews of Modern Physics, 58, 741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.58.741</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bellan, P.M., Yee, J. and Hansen, J.F. (2001) Spheromaks, Solar Prominences, and Alfven Instability of Current Sheets. Earth Planets Space, 53, 495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/BF03353261</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taylor, J.B. and Turner, M.F. (1989) Plasma Current Drive by Helicity Injection in Relaxed States. Nuclear Fusion, 29, 1166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/29/7/009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gimblett, C.G., Hall, P.J., Taylor, J.B. and Turner, M.F. (1987) Eigenvalues Associated with Relaxed States of Toroidal Plasmas. Physics of Fluids, 30, 3186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.866494</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buck, G.J. (1965) Force-Free Magnetic-Field Solution in Toroidal Coordinates. Journal of Applied Physics, 36, 2231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1714456</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turner, M.F. (1984) Analytic Solutions of &amp;nabla; × B = λB Having Separatrices for Geometries with One Ignorable Coordinate. Physics of Fluids, 27, 1677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.864822</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cap, F. and Khalil, Sh.M. (1989) Eigenvalues of Toroidal Plasmas of Arbitrary Aspect Ratio and Arbitrary Cross Section. Nuclear Fusion, 29, 1166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/29/7/009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cap, F. (1986) Electromagnetic Eigenfrequency of Anisotropic Inhomogeneous Axisymmetric Toroidal Plasmas of Arbitrary Meridional Cross Section. Computer Physics Communications, 40, 99-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(86)90151-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cap, F. (1986) Boundary Value Problems of Unseparable Linear Partial Differential Equations. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (ZAMM), 66, 248-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19860660612</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cap, F. (2003) Mathematical Methods in Physics and Engineering with Mathematica. CRC Press, Boca Raton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780203502600</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khalil, S.M. (1996) Eigenvalues of Relaxed Toroidal Plasmas of Arbitrary Sharp Edged Cross Section. 6th Conference of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, Cairo, 15-20 March 1996, 252.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cap, F. (1996) Collocation Methods in Plasma Physics. 4th Workshop on Plasma and Laser Physics, Cairo, 26-29 February 1996.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khalil, S.M. and Altuijri, R.A. (2009) Relaxed Plasma State in Compact Tori. Journal of Fusion Energy, 28, 275-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10894-008-9187-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khalil, S.M., Alomayrah, N.A. and Altuijri, R.A. (2012) Zero Flux Eigenvalues of Relaxed Axisymmetric Compact Tokamaks (CT’s). Journal of Fusion Energy, 31, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10894-011-9434-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hole, M.J., Hudson, S.R. and Dewar, R.L. (2006) Stepped Pressure Profile Equilibria in Cylindrical Plasmas via Partial Taylor Relaxation. Journal of Plasma Physics, 72, 1167-1171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022377806005861</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hudson, S.R., Hole, M.J. and Dewar, R.L. (2007) Eigenvalue Problems for Beltrami Fields Arising in a Three-Dimensional Toroidal Magnetohydrodynamic Equilibrium Problem. Physics of Plasmas, 14, Article ID: 052505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2722721</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gray, T., Brown, M.R. and Dandurand, D. (2013) Observation of a Relaxed Plasma State in a Quasi-Infinite Cylinder. Physical Review Letters, 110, Article ID: 085002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.085002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Browning, P.K., Stanier, A., Ashworth, G., McClements, K.G. and Lukin, V.S. (2014) Self-Organization during Spherical Torus Formation by Flux Rope Merging in the Mega Ampere Spherical Tokamak. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 56, Article ID: 064009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/56/6/064009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62547-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lloyd, B., Ahn, J.-W., Akers, R.J., Appel, L.C., Applegate, D., Axon, K.B., et al. (2014) MAST and the Impact of Low Aspect Ratio on Tokamak Physics. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 46, B477-B494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/46/12B/040</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>