<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2015.612148</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-62504</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Nitrogen Fertilization as Ammonium or Nitrate-N on &lt;i&gt;Hippeastrum hybridum&lt;/i&gt; Bulb Growth
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>arlos</surname><given-names>Vazquez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Stewart</surname><given-names>T. Reed</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christopher</surname><given-names>Dunn</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>USDA, ARS, Miami, FL, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Science, St. Thomas University, Miami Gardens, FL, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>stewart.reed@ars.usda.gov(STR)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>12</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1547</fpage><lpage>1554</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>26</month>	<year>December</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  <em>Hippeastrum</em> (
  <em>Hippeastrum hybridum</em>), a native of Central and South America, is a bulbous ornamental flowering plant in the Amaryllidaceae family. However, the correct balance of NH
  <sub>4</sub> to NO
  <sub>3</sub>-nitrogen in a fertilizer mix for 
  <em>Hippeastrum</em> plants is largely unknown. Nitrogen was applied 2x weekly following irrigation at either 0.6 g (high), 0.3 g (medium) or 0.15 g (low) total N every four months. Nitrogen was supplied in different combinations of NO
  &lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt; and/or NH
  &lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;. Nitrate:NH
  &lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt;-N ratios were either 100% NO
  <sub>3</sub>:0% NH
  <sub>4</sub> (100NO
  <sub>3</sub>), 70% NO
  <sub>3</sub>:30% NH
  <sub>4</sub> (70NO
  <sub>3</sub>), 50% NO
  <sub>3</sub>:50% NH
  <sub>4</sub> (50NO
  <sub>3</sub>) (second group only), 30%NO
  <sub>3</sub>:70%NH
  &lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; (30NO
  <sub>3</sub>), or 0% NO
  <sub>3</sub>/100% NH
  <sub>4</sub> (100NH
  <sub>4</sub>). Growth in bulb diameter after one year of fertilizer treatments not only increased from 0.15 to 0.6 g N (low to high level), but also differed with the form of N supplied to the plant. The largest diameter bulbs were produced in the 70NO
  <sub>3</sub> and 50NO
  <sub>3</sub> high N treatments. Within any NO
  <sub>3</sub>/NH
  <sub>4</sub>-N ratio grouping, fertilization at the high N rate resulted in larger diameter bulbs. No significant differences existed between treatments in the number of bulbs produced. Bulb growth was greater with a portion of N supplied as NO
  <sub>3</sub> than with NH
  <sub>4</sub>-N alone. These results indicate that application of N as a mixture of NH
  <sub>4</sub> and NO
  <sub>3</sub> at 0.6 g per 4 months produces the largest increase in bulb diameter.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Hippeastrum</kwd><kwd> Amaryllis</kwd><kwd> Nitrogen Fertilization</kwd><kwd> Ammonium</kwd><kwd> Nitrate</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Hippeastrum (Hippeastrum hybridum), a native of Central and South America, is a bulbous ornamental flowering plant in the Amaryllidaceae family [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref1">1</xref>] . It features large and showy flowers that come in a variety of bright colors. Hippeastrum is a popular flower for Christmas and the New Year because of its combination of red petals and dark green leaves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref2">2</xref>] . Bulbs are produced by the Netherlands, South Africa Israel, Japan, Brazil and the United States (Florida). Hippeastrum production in Florida for the 2012 season was valued at seven million dollars; centered mainly in Highlands County [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Ammonium as a sole source of nitrogen can result in a variety of negative effects to most plant species. These include but are not limited to a reduced photosynthetic rate, lower dry weights, reduced root growth, and a reduced rate of water uptake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref4">4</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref7">7</xref>] . These studies were mostly on field crops where nitrification is presumed to be rapid. Nursery crops are often grown in soilless media that maybe pasteurized. The growth of ornamental shrub, “Doublefile viburnums” (Viburnum plicatum var. tomentosum), shoot and root was significantly lower with NH<sub>4</sub> (ammonium) supplied alone than that with NO<sub>3</sub> (nitrate) or a combination of NH<sub>4</sub> and NO<sub>3</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref8">8</xref>] . Hydroponically grown date palm seedlings had the greatest leaf area and root weight with NO<sub>3</sub> as the sole nitrogen (N) source but had a lower root:shoot ratio than with NH<sub>4</sub>- or urea-N sources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref9">9</xref>] . Lilium root growth was poor in liquid medium containing a high NH<sub>4</sub>/NO<sub>3</sub> ratio, however, a high NH<sub>4</sub> content increased bulb enlargement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref10">10</xref>] . In contrast, Lilium bulblets supplied with NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> (ammonium nitrate) depleted a hydroponic media of NH<sub>4</sub> very rapidly while NO<sub>3</sub> removal was at a steady state [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref11">11</xref>] . Uniform availability of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> ions was thought to be important for optimum bulblet growth. A NH<sub>4</sub>/NO<sub>3</sub> ratio of approximately 30:70 is thought to produce the best growth in most plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>In Hippeastrum, bulbs grew best when fertilized with 25 mM N (as NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub>) and enriched with CO<sub>2</sub> (carbon dioxide) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref12">12</xref>] . Hippeastrum bulbs are a strong sinks for nutrient accumulation during the initial stages of bulbil development. Once leaves begin to supply assimilates for plant growth, bulbs become a source of nutrients for the developing plant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref13">13</xref>] . Similar results were reported for Odontoglossum hybrids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref14">14</xref>] . When the N concentration was lower than that supplied to the control, the order of N content was leaves &gt; roots &gt; bulbs, but when the N concentration was higher than the control, the order was bulbs &gt; leaves &gt; roots. However, the correct balance of NH<sub>4</sub> to NO<sub>3</sub>-nitrogen in a fertilizer mix for Hippeastrum plants is largely unknown.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The study was conducted at the Subtropical Horticulture Research Station (SHRS) in Coral Gables, FL (Latitude: N 25˚38.577815', Longitude: W 80˚17.545062').</p><p>Hippeastrum bulbs were grown in a greenhouse from seed collected from a self-pollinated tetraploid hybrid clone. Seed were germinated on a mist table in two groups planted approximately 30 d apart. The first (group 1) group of 150 plants was grown in the SHRS greenhouse 3 which has evaporative cooling; the second (group 2) group of 150 plants was grown in SHRS greenhouse 2 which is cooled by fans. Greenhouse 3 is approximately 10˚C cooler (mean daily temperature) than greenhouse 2. In addition, plants in greenhouse 3 received a starter fertilizer treatment resulting in larger bulbs at the onset of the study. Therefore, each group was treated separately. Soil was completely removed from plants in group 1 when bulbs were transplanted. On March 26, 2012, all plants were transplanted into 10 &#215; 10 cm square, 450 mL pots containing a mix of 50% pine bark, 10% sand, 40% coir pith, fortified with 4.4 kg dolomite, and 3.2 kg of a micronutrient mix per cubic meter (6% Ca from calcium carbonate, 3% Mg from magnesium carbonate, 12% S, 0.10% B from sodium borate, 1% Cu from copper sulfate, 17% Fe from ferrous sulfate, 2.5% Mn from manganese sulfate, 0.05% Mo from sodium molybdate, 1.0% Zn from zinc sulfate). Phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) were supplied at a rate of 1 g triple super phosphate and 3 g K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> per pot at planting and again every four months.</p><p>Nitrogen was supplied 2x weekly following irrigation with a syringe containing a solution with 0.241 M N for High concentration enough N to supply 0.6 g (high), 0.121 M N for Medium concentration 0.3 g (medium) or 0.060 M N for Low concentration 0.15 g (low) total N over a four month period. Nitrogen was supplied in different combinations of NO<sub>3</sub> and/or NH<sub>4</sub>. Nitrate:NH<sub>4</sub>-N ratios were 100% NO<sub>3</sub>:0% NH<sub>4</sub> (100NO<sub>3</sub>), 70% NO<sub>3</sub>:30% NH<sub>4</sub> (70NO<sub>3</sub>), 50% NO<sub>3</sub>:50% NH<sub>4</sub> (50NO<sub>3</sub>) (second group only), 30%NO<sub>3</sub>:70%NH<sub>4</sub> (30NO<sub>3</sub>), or 0% NO<sub>3</sub>:100% NH<sub>4</sub> (100NH<sub>4</sub>). Plants were irrigated with in-pot emitters 2x weekly to saturation plus a 10% leaching requirement during the hot months and once weekly when temperature cooled.</p><p>Initially measurements of bulb diameter were recorded on 17 Dec. 2012. Bulb number, diameter and weight were determined after 400 days of growth and again after 730 days. Growth is defined as the change in bulb diameter between measurements from the initial measurement to the diameter after 400 days.</p><p>A completely randomized design was utilized with five levels of ammonium-N to nitrate-N ratios, three different application rates, with eight plants per treatment for the first group. The second group had a completely randomized design with four nitrate-N to ammonium-N ratios with 12 plants per treatment. Each group was analyzed separately. Analysis of variance was performed on the data using the Mixed Procedure of Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and Least Squares Means values were separated by Tukey’s test. Statistical tests were run of the model y = nitrogen source x application rate x source by application interaction x replication, where nitrogen source and application rate were fixed effects.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows the weight, diameter and number of bulbs produced for Group 1. Treatment 100NO<sub>3</sub>M, followed by treatments 100NO<sub>3</sub>H, 70NO<sub>3</sub>M, 30NO<sub>3</sub>H and 70NO<sub>3</sub>H, produced the greatest bulb weights. Within a given NO<sub>3</sub> to NH<sub>4</sub> nitrogen source ratio, no significant differences between high and medium application rates occurred for bulb weight. The low application rate produced bulbs that were similar to (30NO<sub>3</sub>L) or less than the medium rate. At both the high and medium application rate all treatments including NO<sub>3</sub> as a nitrogen source outperformed treatments using NH<sub>4</sub> as the sole source of nitrogen. Bulb diameter followed the same general trend as bulb weight. No differences existed between the high and medium application rates. Treatments receiving a portion of their nitrogen as NO<sub>3</sub> yielded larger bulb diameters than those receiving NH<sub>4</sub> as the sole nitrogen source at the high and medium application rate. Treatments receiving nitrogen only in the form of NH<sub>4</sub> produced the least number of bulbs.</p><p>In Group 2 the largest diameter bulbs were produced in the 70NO<sub>3</sub> and 50NO<sub>3</sub> high N treatments; however, for plants receiving a portion of their N as NO<sub>3</sub>, no significant differences occurred between treatments at the high N rate (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Plants treated with 100% NH<sub>4</sub>-N at the high rate produced bulbs similar in diameter to plants treated with a mix of NO<sub>3</sub> and NH<sub>4</sub>-N supplied at the medium rate. Within any NO<sub>3</sub>/NH<sub>4</sub>-N ratio grouping, fertilization at the high N rate resulted in larger diameter bulbs than the medium or low application rate. At the medium (or low) application rate 100NO<sub>3</sub> produced larger bulbs than any other N treatment at that application level.</p><p>Bulb weight followed the same general trend as bulb diameter; at the high N rate a mixture of NO<sub>3</sub> and NH<sub>4</sub>-N produced the greatest bulb weights, within any N application level, 100NH<sub>4</sub>-N treatments produced the</p>
<table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Diameter and weight of Hippeastrum hybridum bulbs fertilized with either 0.15 (L), 0.3 (M) or 0.6 (H) g nitrogen every four months as 100% NO<sub>3</sub>-N, 70% NO<sub>3</sub>/30% NH<sub>4</sub>-N, 30% NO<sub>3</sub>/70% NH<sub>4</sub>-N, or 100% NH<sub>4</sub>-N in group 1</title></caption>
</table-wrap><p><sup>z</sup>Numbers in an individual column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05; <sup>y</sup>not significant</p>
<table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Diameter and weight of Hippeastrum hybridum bulbs fertilized with either 0.15 (L), 0.3 (M) or 0.6 (H) g nitrogen every four months as 100% NO<sub>3</sub>-N, 70% NO<sub>3</sub>/30% NH<sub>4</sub>-N, 50% NO<sub>3</sub>/50% NH<sub>4</sub>-N, 30% NO<sub>3</sub>/70% NH<sub>4</sub>-N, or 100% NH<sub>4</sub>-N in group 2</title></caption></table-wrap><p><sup>z</sup>Numbers in an individual column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05; <sup>y</sup>not significant.</p><p>smallest bulbs, and bulb size increased with increasing N fertilization rates. Secondary bulbs were generally small and added very little to the total bulb weight; total bulb weight followed the same trend as main bulb weight. No significant differences occurred between treatments in the number of bulbs produced. However, the 100NO<sub>3</sub> treatments tended to produce the greatest number of bulbs and 100NH<sub>4</sub> the lowest within N application levels.</p><p>The number of bulb scales determines flowering in Hippeastrum. A flower bud is produced with every eight scales. Ephrath et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref15">15</xref>] and Silberbush et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref12">12</xref>] reported that bulb diameter was the best predictor of flowering capability and timing. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows a box plot of growth in bulb diameter after one year of fertilizer treatments. An unfertilized treatment (zero N) is included for comparison. Zero N treatment only provided enough fertility to maintain initial bulb size with very little additional increase in bulb diameter. Since initial size of a bulb should not affect its increase in relative growth from one date to another, Groups 1 and 2 data are combined in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Bulb growth responded not only to increase from 0.15 to 0.6 g N (low to high level) but also to the form of N supplied to the plant. The median increase in bulb growth was greater with a portion of N supplied as NO<sub>3</sub> than with NH<sub>4</sub>-N alone. Treatments producing the five largest median bulb sizes all received a portion of their N as NO<sub>3</sub> applied at the high rate or with 100NO<sub>3</sub> treatment high and medium application rates. Bulbs from Group 1 are arranged in order of high N level treatment diameter mean (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Root density was rated on visual appearance as low, medium or high. Plants receiving 50% or more of their N as NO<sub>3</sub> produced a denser root mass than plant receiving a majority of their N in the form of NH<sub>4</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). Below 50% NO<sub>3</sub>-N root density began to thin out. Root density was thinner at the low N fertility than at the high level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)).</p><p>During the second year greenhouse temperatures were excessive and as a result bulb growth was inhibited. Although nitrogen source affected bulb diameter (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) the 50NO<sub>3</sub>L treatment was the only treatment with a significantly larger increase in diameter. All other treatments resulted in a similar change in bulb diameter from the previous year (data not shown). In all treatments except for 50NO<sub>3</sub>L less than one cm of growth was recorded. Nitrogen source and application rate had a significant effect on changes in bulb weight.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Box plot of Hippeastum bulb diameter growth from plants fertilized with 0%N, 100%NH4-N, 100% NO<sub>3</sub>-N, or 70:30, 50:50 or 30:70 NO<sub>3</sub>:NH<sub>4</sub> nitrogen ratios at 0.6 (H) or 0.3 (M) g per pot per 4-month period. Box incompases 25<sup>th</sup> through 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles, whiskers at the 5<sup>th</sup> and 95<sup>th</sup> percentiles, dash line is the mean, solid line the median, and circles represent outliers. Boxes above dotted line are from treatments producing the five largest increases in plant diameter</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x8.png"/></fig><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Hippeastrum bulbs after one year of nitrogen fertilization totaling 1.8 g (a) and 0.6 g (b) applied in different ratios of nitrate to ammonium-nitrogen.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x9.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x10.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x11.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_4"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x12.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_5"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x13.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_6"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x14.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_7"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x15.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_8"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x16.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_9"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x17.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_10"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x18.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>All five high nitrogen application rates and the 50NO<sub>3</sub>M and 50NO<sub>3</sub>L treatments were the only treatments that resulted in increased bulb weight after the second year (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The reduction in bulb weight for the remaining treatments was attributed to extended periods of elevated summer greenhouse temperatures. Fertilization at the medium to low rates did not supply enough nutrients to support plant maintenance and additional growth with greater respiratory demand at high summer greenhouse temperatures. Bulb diameter and weight gain in year two were similar to that of the first year; 50NO<sub>3</sub>H and 70NO<sub>3</sub>H outperformed all other treatments.</p>
<table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Mixed Model ANOVA for nitrogen treatment effects on bulb weight and bulb diameter</title></caption></table-wrap><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Box plot of Hippeastum second year bulb weight increase from plants fertilized with 0%N, 100%NH<sub>4</sub>-N, 100% NO<sub>3</sub>-N, or 70:30, 50:50 or 30:70 NO<sub>3</sub>: NH<sub>4</sub> nitrogen ratios at 0.6 (H) or 0.3 (M) or 0.15 (L) g per pot per 4-month period. Box incompases 25<sup>th</sup> through 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles, whiskers at the 5<sup>th</sup> and 95<sup>th</sup> percentiles, dash line is the mean, solid line the median, and circles represent outliers. Boxes above dotted line are from treatments producing the five largest increases in plant diameter</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x19.png"/></fig><p>Nitrogen is a nutrient element that plants require in amounts larger than that of any other soil supplied element. Most plants can utilize both <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, however, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>at high concentration can be toxic to plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref4">4</xref>] . Plants differ in their sensitivity to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> toxicity. Onion, a member of the Amaryllidaceae Family, is known to be fairly tolerant to high concentrations of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-3001224x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref16">16</xref>] . In our study Hippeastrum, a member of the Amaryllidaceae, suffered reduced bulb size when fertilized with ammonium as the sole source of N. The ammonium applied was not considered excessive, however, temperatures in the greenhouse were high compared to conditions that Amaryllidaceae were normally grown under in South Florida. High concentrations of ammonium reduce plant growth in a number of ways, including but not limited to: reduced stomatal conductance, increased utilization of reserve carbohydrates and the ability to neutralize reactive oxygen species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref17">17</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62504-ref19">19</xref>] . Each of these mechanisms can be enhanced at high temperatures. A long-term exposure to ammonium combined with elevated temperatures could easily account for the reduction in growth from ammonium as the sole source of N compared to other N sources with different nitrate concentrations. Based on these results, application of N as NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> at 0.6 g per 4 months produced the largest increase in bulb diameter.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>CarlosVazquez,StewartT. Reed,ChristopherDunn, (2015) Nitrogen Fertilization as Ammonium or Nitrate-N on Hippeastrum hybridum Bulb Growth. Agricultural Sciences,06,1547-1554. doi: 10.4236/as.2015.612148</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.62504-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sultana, J., Sultana, N., Siddique, M.N.A., Islam, A.K.M.A., Hossain, M.M. and Hossain, T. (2010) In Vitro Bulb Production in Hippeastrum (Hippeastrum hybridum). Journal of Central European Agriculture, 11, 469-474. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/11.4.867</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meerow, A.W., Van Scheepen, J. and Dutilh, J.H.A. (1997) Transfers from Amaryllis to Hippeastrum (Amaryllidaceae). Taxon, 46, 15-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1224287</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service (2012) Census of Agriculture—County Data Florida 489.  
http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_State_Level/Florida/st12_1_041_041.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Britto, D.T. and Kronzucker, H.J. (2002) NH4+ Toxicity in Higher Plants: A Critical Review. Journal of Plant Physiology, 159, 567-584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-0774</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cramer, M. D. and Lewis, O.A.M. (1993) The Influence of Nitrate and Ammonium Nutrition on the Growth of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Maize (Zea mays) Plants. Annals of Botany, 72, 359-365. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1993.1119</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gerendas, J., Zhu, Z.J., Bendixen, R., Ratcliffe, R.G. and Sattelmacher, B. (1997) Physiological and Biochemical Processes Related to Ammonium Toxicity in Higher Plants. Zeitschriftfür Pflanzenern&amp;aumlhrung und Bodenkunde, 160, 239-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jpln.19971600218</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, S.W., Kaldenhoff, R., Uehlein, N., Sattelmacher, B. and Brueck, H. (2007) Relationship between Water and Nitrogen Uptake in Nitrate- and Ammonium-Supplied Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 170, 73-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200625073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dirr</surname><given-names> M. A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1975</year>)<article-title>, Effect of Nitrogen form and pH on Growth, NO3-N, NH4-N and Total N Content of Container-Grown Doublefile viburnum</article-title><source> Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science</source><volume> 100</volume>,<fpage> 216</fpage>-<lpage>218</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Ghamidi, A.A., Helal, A.A. and Al-Whaibi, M.H. (1999) Nitrogen Source and the Growth of Date Palm Seedlings. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2, 1207-1210. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.1999.1207.1210</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haruki, K., Yamada, K., Hosoki, T. and Ohta, K. (1996) Effects of Nitrogen Source, Phosphate and Sulfate in Liquid-Shaking Culture on the Growth of Miniature Bulbs of Lilium japonicum Thunb. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science, 65, 387-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.2503/jjshs.65.387</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lian, M., Chakrabarty, D. and Paek, K.Y. (2002) Growth and Uptake of Sucrose and Mineral Ions by Bulblets of Lilium Oriental Hybrid “Casablanca” during Bioreactor Culture. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 77, 253-257.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silberbush, M., Ephrath, J.E., Alekperov, C. and Ben-Asher, J. (2003) Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilization Interactions with Carbon Dioxide Enrichment in Hippeastrum Bulb Growth. Scientia Horticulturae, 98, 85-90. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00205-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stancatoa, G.C., Mazzafera, P. and Magalh&amp;atildees, A.C. (1995) Dry Matter Partitioning during the Propagation of Hippeastrum hybridum as Affected by Light. Scientia Horticulturae, 62, 81-87. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(94)00761-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yoneda, K., Suzuki, N. and Hasegawa, I. (1999) Effects of Macroelement Concentrations on Growth, Flowering, and Nutrient Absorption in an Odontoglossum Hybrid. Scientia Horticulturae, 80, 259-265. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(98)00251-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ephrath, J.E., Ben-Asher, J., Alekperov, C., Silberbush, M. and Dayan, E. (2001) The Growth and Development of Hippeastrum in Response to Temperature and CO2. Biotronics, 30, 63-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abbes, C., Parent, L.E., Karam, A. and Isfan, D. (1995) Onion Response to Ammoniated Peat and Ammonium Sulfate in Relation to Ammonium Toxicity. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 75, 261-272.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjss95-038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Givak</surname><given-names> C.V. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1997</year>)<article-title>Metabolic Detoxification of Ammonia in Tissues of Higher Plants</article-title><source> Phytochemistry</source><volume> 18</volume>,<fpage> 375</fpage>-<lpage>382</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hawkins, H.-J. and Lewis, O.A.M. (1993) Combination Effect of NaCl Salinity, Nitrogen Form and Calcium Concentration on the Growth, Ionic Content and Gaseous Exchange Properties of Triticum aestivum L. cv. Gamtoos. New Phytologist, 124, 161-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03806.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62504-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xing, S., Wang, J., Zhou, Y., Bloszies, S.A., Tu, C. and Hu, S. (2015) Effects of NH4+-N/NO3–-N Ratios on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Dry Matter Yield and Nitrate Concentration of Spinach. Experimental Agriculture, 51, 151-160. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479714000192</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>